Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Enhanced Recovery and Detection of Highly Infectious Animal Disease Viruses by Virus Capture Using Nanotrap® Microbiome a Particles

Version 1 : Received: 25 September 2024 / Approved: 25 September 2024 / Online: 26 September 2024 (09:53:07 CEST)

How to cite: Das, A.; Gutkoska, J.; Tadassa, Y.; Jia, W. Enhanced Recovery and Detection of Highly Infectious Animal Disease Viruses by Virus Capture Using Nanotrap® Microbiome a Particles. Preprints 2024, 2024092047. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.2047.v1 Das, A.; Gutkoska, J.; Tadassa, Y.; Jia, W. Enhanced Recovery and Detection of Highly Infectious Animal Disease Viruses by Virus Capture Using Nanotrap® Microbiome a Particles. Preprints 2024, 2024092047. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.2047.v1

Abstract

This study reports the use of Nanotrap® Microbiome A Particles (NMAPs) to capture and concentrate viruses from diluted samples/specimens to improve their recovery and sensitivity of detection by real-time PCR/RT-PCR (qPCR/RT-qPCR). Five highly infectious animal disease viruses including goat pox virus (GTPV), sheep pox virus (SPPV), lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV), peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV), and African swine fever virus (ASFV) were used in this study. After capture, the viruses remained viable and recoverable by virus isolation (VI) using susceptible cell lines. To assess efficacy of recovery, the viruses were serially diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) or Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) and then subjected to virus capture using NMAPs. The NMAPs and the captured viruses were clarified on a magnetic stand, reconstituted in PBS or EMEM, and analyzed separately by VI and virus-specific qPCR/RT-qPCR. The results of the qPCR/RT-qPCR showed up to 100-fold increase in the sensitivity of detection of the viruses following virus capture compared to the untreated viruses from the same dilutions. NMAPs were used to capture and concentrate viruses from clinical specimens to determine diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) that were comparable (100%) to the untreated specimens. NMAPs were also used to capture spiked viruses from EDTA whole blood (EWB). Virus capture from EWB was partially blocked, most likely by hemoglobin (HMB), which also binds NMAPs and outcompetes the viruses. The effect of HMB could be removed by either dilution (in PBS) or using HemogloBind™ (Biotech Support Group; Monmouth Junction, NJ) that specifically binds and precipitates HMB. Enhanced recovery and detection of viruses using NMAPs can be applicable to other highly pathogenic animal viruses of agricultural importance.

Keywords

Goat pox virus; sheep pox virus; lumpy skin disease virus; peste des petits ruminants virus; African swine fever virus; virus capture; nanotrap; PCR

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Virology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.