Preprint Review Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Relationship Between Perceived and Received Social Support in Family Caregivers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Version 1 : Received: 25 September 2024 / Approved: 26 September 2024 / Online: 26 September 2024 (09:56:24 CEST)

How to cite: Gutiérrez-Sánchez., B.; López-Martínez., C.; Da-Silva-Domingues, H.; Del-Pino-Casado., R. Relationship Between Perceived and Received Social Support in Family Caregivers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Preprints 2024, 2024092065. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.2065.v1 Gutiérrez-Sánchez., B.; López-Martínez., C.; Da-Silva-Domingues, H.; Del-Pino-Casado., R. Relationship Between Perceived and Received Social Support in Family Caregivers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Preprints 2024, 2024092065. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.2065.v1

Abstract

Introduction: The care of dependent people is eminently family-oriented, and often, there is a high level of dedication to this family care. Constant and continuous care leads to a series of negative psychological consequences. Social support has been related to improved mental health in family caregivers. We found heterogeneous results regarding the relationship between the types of social support received and the perceived level of support. In addition, to our knowledge, no reviews analyze this relationship among family caregivers. Therefore, we aimed to systematically syn-thesize the relationships between perceived and received social support in informal caregivers. Methodology: We have carried out a quantitative systematic review with meta-analysis, regis-tered in PROSPERO (id: CRD42023470047); the systematic search was carried out in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus, until November 2023. After the selection and review of the results, 12 studies were obtained, two of which were eliminated due to a high risk of classification bias. Regarding the results, a medium size positive statistical association was found (r = 0.43). The results were consistent, accurate, and robust. The Trim and Fill test showed a vari-ation of 7%. Subgroup analysis indicated no differences in the age group of the people cared for (adults or children), selection bias, and confounding bias. In conclusion, perceived social support is related to more social support received by family caregivers.

Keywords

Perceived social support; received social support; informal caregivers; meta-analysis

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Nursing

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.