Introduction
First cases of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019. The disease, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2), spread rapidly worldwide and was announced as a global pandemic by the world health organization (WHO) in March 2020. As of July 2023, the different variants of COVID-19 are responsible for 700 million infections and 7 million deaths. At the end of 2020 two mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were authorized by the FDA. Large, randomized, controlled phase 3 trials proved the two dose BNT 1626b2 Pfizer vaccine to confer 95% protection against COVID-19 infection [
1]. Vaccination in real world conditions reconfirmed the high efficiency in preventing infection and demonstrated secondary benefits of the vaccine in reducing COVID-19 hospital admissions, attenuating disease severity and duration of illness [
2].
Patients living with HIV (PLWH) were assumed to have an increased risk for COVID-19 infection and to have more severe illness. Conflicting reports were published. Initial studies found no increased risk for infection or more severe COVID-19 illness among PLWH. Yet, later studies demonstrated an increased risk for severe COVID-19 among PLWH [
3]. PLWH are often less responsive to vaccines, with lower efficacy. Even successfully treated HIV patients, show specific defects in memory follicular T helper cells that lead to reduced B cell response and antibodies production [
4,
5,
6]. Data regarding COVID-19 vaccination in PLWH and the clinical characteristics of their serologic response was sparse [
7,
8,
9,
10]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the magnitude of immunological response to sequential BNT 162b2 mRNA vaccines in PLWH regarding demographic and clinical factors including CD4 status, viral load, COVID-19 morbidity, and hospitalization.
Methods
Patients
PLWH treated at the "Neve Or" HIV clinic were offered an anti- SARS-CoV-2 antibody test to be added to their routine laboratory workup. Testing for anti- SARS-CoV-2 antibody started on March 1st 2021. Patients with a COVID -19 serology test between 01/03/2021 and 30/10/2021 were included in the current retrospective cohort.
Demographic Clinical and Laboratory Data
Data were collected from patients' electronic files. Demographic characteristics included gender, age and way of HIV acquisition. Clinical characteristic included CD4, nadir of CD4, time since HIV diagnosis (in years), viral suppression, COVID-19 morbidity, hospital admissions for COVID-19 infection and outcomes, number and dates of COVID-19 vaccination and antibodies titers.
The BNT 1626b2 Pfizer vaccine was used for all vaccinated patients and subsequent second and third booster immunizations if taken. Abbott's© SARS-CoV-2 IgG II quant assay was used to determine the qualitative measure of IgG antibodies against spike receptor binding domain (RBD). This test detects a positive antibody responses from both infected and vaccinated individuals. A titer of less than 50 reflects no immunization, titers between 50 and 40,000 are considered immune and results higher than 40,000 are regarded highly immune. RBD IgG levels were recorded in relation to the time (measured in days) from each vaccine taken.
Patients were divided to three groups according to their CD4 cell count; less than 200 cells/µl, CD4 cells count between 200-500 cells/µl and above 500 cells/ µl. viral load was considered undetectable for participants with less than 200 copies/µl.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Continuous variables between the study groups were tested for normality by Shapiro- Wilk test and when abnormal distribution was found, non-parametric tests were performed. The Kruskal-Wallis H groups was performed to compare the three groups. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine any significant differences between variability over time. Initial multivariable logistic regression models were built including variables with statistical significance at univariate analysis. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.
Discussion
In this study, which examined 784 people living with HIV (PLWH) in Israel, we observed a high rate of COVID-19 vaccination, with about 90% of the participants receiving at least two doses of the BNT 162b2 mRNA vaccine. The high vaccination rate against COVID-19 observed in our cohort is particularly noteworthy when compared to other studies in different regions. For instance, a cross-sectional study in South Africa reported that only 57% of PLWH were willing to accept future vaccination [
11], and a study from New York City found that 28% of PLWH had not received any COVID-19 vaccination by March 2022 [
12]. The rate of COVID-19 vaccination among our HIV patients was higher compared to the rate of vaccination among the general population in Israel, which was 84.3% in March 2022 [
13]. The higher vaccination rates in our study may reflect the stronger engagement of PLWH to healthcare compared to the general population.
The demographic characteristics of our patients represents HIV infected patients in a "real world" setting. Our cohort included a unique patient population with relatively high proportion of women and individuals of African descent, mainly Ethiopian, which may differ from other studies that predominantly feature male participants [
12]. Additionally, our study followed large number of HIV patients during a long period of the COVID-19 pandemic, reflecting the surge of different variants waves including the beta, delta, omicron BA1/2 and even for some extent omicron BA4/5. This broad temporal coverage adds robustness to our findings, suggesting that the immune response observed is consistent across different variants of the virus.
In Oct 2021, the cumulative COVID-19 infection rate of our HIV patients was 27.6%, higher than the infection rate of the entire Israeli population at the same time point [
14]. Despite the higher rates of infection, hospitalization rate due to COVID-19 was not higher than the rate of hospitalization in the entire Israeli population [
14]. Only six patients required hospitalization, all of them recovered. A study from the USA from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic reported that people living with diagnosed HIV experienced poorer COVID-related outcomes relative to persons living without diagnosed HIV [
15]. Later study, from the UK found an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.49 for invasive mechanical ventilation/death of hospitalized PLWH compared to HIV negative hospitalized population [
16]. This encouraging finding suggests COVID-19 vaccination provides substantial protection against severe disease in PLWH, even among those with lower CD4 counts. The absence of COVID-19-related mortality in our cohort further supports the effectiveness of vaccination in this population.
In line with other studies, our research confirms that PLWH with higher CD4 cell counts exhibit better immunologic responses to COVID-19 vaccines [
17,
18]. Specifically, patients with CD4 counts below 200 cells/µL had significantly lower antibody titers after vaccination [
19,
20]. Notably, our findings align with those from other studies, such as an Israeli study that reported 136 PLWH having a humoral immune response comparable with that of health care workers (without HIV) to 2 doses of BNT 162b2 mRNA vaccine. PLWH with CD4 cell counts less than 300 cells/µl had lower antibody titers than those with higher CD4 cell count [
10].
Interestingly, while age, sex, and previous COVID-19 infection did not significantly impact the first antibody titer in our cohort, older age was associated with higher antibody titers in subsequent measurements. This finding contrasts with some reports that suggest older individuals might have a diminished response to vaccination [
21]. The reasons for this discrepancy could be multifactorial and warrant further investigation. It is possible that the older participants in our study had more consistent healthcare access or that other unmeasured factors contributed to this outcome.
Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence that suggests PLWH, particularly those with well-managed HIV, exhibit a robust immunologic response to COVID-19 vaccination [
22]. An Israeli prospective study with 143 PLWH found the BNT 162b2 mRNA vaccine to be immunogenic in PLWH that were taking antiretroviral treatment, with unsuppressed CD4 cell counts and suppressed viral load [
7]. A retrospective analysis of 665 PLWH from Germany/Munich found a strong immune response to standard vaccination with a high antibody concentration associated with being female and having high CD4 cell counts [
9]. Our study found that a significant majority (78.8%) of participants had normal or high titers of COVID-19 antibodies after the first serological measurement, and this proportion increased with subsequent measurements.
Despite these positive outcomes, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of our study. As a retrospective analysis, our study is subject to the inherent biases associated with this study design, including selection bias and the potential for missing data. Moreover, our cohort is relatively unique, with a high rate of viral suppression and a specific demographic composition, which may limit the generalizability of our findings to other PLWH populations.
In conclusion, our study provides valuable insights into the immunologic response to COVID-19 vaccination in PLWH, highlighting the importance of vaccination in this population. The findings underscore the need for continued efforts to vaccinate PLWH, particularly those with lower CD4 counts, to ensure broad protection against COVID-19. Further research, particularly prospective studies with control groups, is needed to fully understand the long-term immunologic outcomes and the potential need for additional booster doses in this population.
Table 3.
Multinomial logistic regression of age, sex, previous COVID-19 infection and last CD4 value of first and second titer of COVID-19 antibodies.
Table 3.
Multinomial logistic regression of age, sex, previous COVID-19 infection and last CD4 value of first and second titer of COVID-19 antibodies.
|
First titer of COVID-19 antibodies (784 patients) |
Second titer of COVID-19 antibodies (555 patients) |
|
B |
Std. Error |
Wald (df=1) |
Exp(B) |
95% Confidence Interval |
B |
Std. Error |
Wald |
Exp(B) |
95% Confidence Interval |
Age |
0.016 |
0.009 |
3.471 |
1.016 |
0.999-1.034 |
0.024 |
0.012 |
4.224* |
1.025 |
1.001-1.049 |
Sex |
0.232 |
0.214 |
1.169 |
1.261 |
0.828-1.918 |
0.555 |
0.286 |
3.767 |
1.742 |
0.995-3.05 |
COVID-19 infection |
0.214 |
0.244 |
0.769 |
1.238 |
0.768-1.996 |
-0.220 |
0.318 |
0.479 |
0.803 |
0.431-1.496 |
CD4 |
-1.189 |
0.349 |
11.609* |
0.304 |
0.154-0.603 |
-1.344 |
0.432 |
9.704** |
0.261 |
0.112-0.607 |