Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Tissue Engineering Construct for Articular Cartilage Restoration with Stromal Cells from Synovium vs Dental Pulp - A Pre-Clinical Study

Version 1 : Received: 30 September 2024 / Approved: 1 October 2024 / Online: 1 October 2024 (04:57:43 CEST)

How to cite: Fernandes, T. L.; Santanna, J. P. C.; de Faria, R. R.; Pastore, E. R.; Bueno, D. F.; Hernandez, A. J. Tissue Engineering Construct for Articular Cartilage Restoration with Stromal Cells from Synovium vs Dental Pulp - A Pre-Clinical Study. Preprints 2024, 2024100013. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.0013.v1 Fernandes, T. L.; Santanna, J. P. C.; de Faria, R. R.; Pastore, E. R.; Bueno, D. F.; Hernandez, A. J. Tissue Engineering Construct for Articular Cartilage Restoration with Stromal Cells from Synovium vs Dental Pulp - A Pre-Clinical Study. Preprints 2024, 2024100013. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.0013.v1

Abstract

Introduction: Cartilage injuries and osteoarthritis are very prevalent and considered a public health problem, as they are highly disabling and represent an economic burden. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) can be isolated from different tissues and have the immunomodulatory capacity to regulate local articular joint environment. This translational study aims to compare the cartilage restoration from MSCs from the synovial membrane (SM) and dental pulp (DP), by tissue engineered treatment in a Good Manufacturing Practices. Materials and Methods: A controlled experimental study in fourteen miniature pigs was performed, using scaffold-free Tissue Engineering Construct (TEC) from DP and SM MSCs, with 6 months follow-up. Total thickness cartilage defects were performed in both posterior knees. The defect was left empty on one side, and the other received TEC from DP (n=7) or from SM (n=7). MRI assessed morphology with the MOCART scoring system. T2 mapping assessed water and collagen fiber composition. Histology evaluated cartilage repair using the ICRS-2 score. Results: The mean MOCART value in the untreated group was 46.2 ± 13.4, while the group treated with TEC from SM was 65.7 ± 15.5 (p

Keywords

tissue engineering; mesenchymal stromal cells; dental pulp; synovium; cartilage injuries; cartilage restoration

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.