Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Low Energy Desalination Techniques, Development of CDI Systems, and Utilization of Activated Carbon

Altmetrics

Downloads

73

Views

31

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

01 October 2024

Posted:

01 October 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Water desalination technology has emerged as a critical area of research, particularly with the advent of more cost-effective alternatives to conventional methods such as reverse osmosis and thermal evaporation. Given the vital importance of water for life and the scarcity of potable water for agriculture and livestock—especially in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia—the capacitative deionization (CDI) method for removing salt from water is highlighted as the most economical choice compared to other techniques. CDI applies a voltage difference across two porous electrodes to extract salt ions from saline water. This study will investigate water desalination using CDI, utilizing a compact D.C. power source under 5 volts and a standard current of 2 amperes. We will convert waste materials like sunflower seeds, peanut shells, and rice husks into activated carbon through carbonization and chemical activation to improve its pore structure. Critical parameters for desalination, including voltage, flow rate, and total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration, have been established. The initial TDS levels are set at 2000, 1500, 1000, and 500 ppm, with flow rates of 38.2, 16.8, and 9.5 mL/min across various voltage settings of 1.5, 2, and 2.5 volts, applicable to both direct and inverse desalination methods. Results indicate that desalination processes function effectively at a flow rate of 9.5 mL/min, achieving a performance efficiency of 65%, while a voltage of 2.5 volts yields a performance level of 44%.
Keywords: 
Subject: Engineering  -   Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. Introduction

To achieve the objective of supplying everyone with safe and affordable drinking water, water treatment technology must advance through innovation. Over 97% of the water resources on Earth are salt water, mainly seawater, making desalination an appealing alternative. Water is everywhere, along with salty lakes, estuaries, mangroves, and marshes. Total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration is a criterion that can be used to classify salt water. Freshwater is defined as having a TDS concentration of 500 ppm or less, salty water as having a TDS concentration of 500 ppm to 15,000 ppm, and seawater as having a TDS concentration of more than 15,000 ppm [1,2].
A typical CDI cell comprises two porous electrodes connected by a spacer, which allows water to flow between them. CDI gathers Ionized species on porous electrodes to operate [1]. An applied voltage during operation causes the adsorption of ions on the electrodes, which results in the production of freshwater. A few operational parameters that impact conventional CDI procedures are flow rate, flow delivery, applied voltage, and ion concentration. Various newly investigated materials, including carbon fiber cloth (ACC), graphene aerogels, carbon nanotubes, and graphene powders, including surface-modified variants, are used to manufacture CDI electrodes. Researchers have also developed several models to anticipate and enhance CDI processes. In other cases, high-resolution modeling has even been employed to investigate the relationships between absorption, laminar flow, and diffusion in flow-between or flow-through CDI cells. Capacitive deionization (CDI) has grown in acceptance as a dependable, affordable, and energy-efficient method for desalinating water with a low to moderate salt content [3,4,5,6].
The capacitive deionization (CDI) water treatment system removes ions from water through an electrochemical process [7]. CDI is a type of desalination technology that is gaining popularity since it uses less energy and is more affordable than other methods. In CDI, an electrical potential is applied using two porous electrodes that are separated from one another by a spacer. The electrical double layer at the electrode surface attracts and stores ions from the water that flows through the electrodes. Deionized water is created when the number of ions in the water decreases as it goes by the electrodes. Concerning other desalination methods, CDI provides several benefits, such as low energy consumption, low operating costs, and the ability to filter a range of ions from water [8]. The scalability of CDI makes it suitable for both small- and large-scale water treatment applications. Since CDI can remove cations and anions from water, it is an efficient way to remove contaminants such as salts, heavy metals, and organic materials. Additionally, eliminating specific ions from water via CDI, including nitrates, fluoride, and arsenic, is possible [9,10].
Since salt ions are the most minor component in water, CDI is an efficient method for purifying water with a salt concentration below 10 g/L. Instead, various techniques are used to remove the water component of the salt solution. Energy can be recovered by charging a nearby cell participating in the ion electrosorption process with the energy released during electrode regeneration (also called electrode discharge or ion release). The CDI cycle begins with a charging stage (ion electrosorption) that purifies the water. At a later time, we'll go more deeply into this juncture. This procedure trapped ions between two porous carbon electrodes [8,9]. Desorbed ions are released from the electrodes in the next step, resulting in electrode regeneration (Figure 1). Capacitive deionization's fundamental mechanism is depicted schematically. Progress in water treatment technology is essential to providing clean, dependable drinking water. With over 97% of the planet's water sourced from the ocean, desalination has emerged as an attractive solution. Ocean water, freshwater lakes, estuarine water, mangrove ecosystems, and wetland water [11,12,13,14].
In the CDI process, a cation-exchange membrane is placed in front of the cathode, while an anion-exchange membrane is placed in front of the anode. Historically, capacitive deionization has received less attention than investigations on carbon porous electrodes for capacitive energy storage systems. However, the use of carbon porous electrodes for water desalination has been known since the 1960s, referred to as "electrochemical demineralization" or "electrosorb process for desalting water." Only recently has academic interest and commercialization of CDI technologies increased [4,15,16].
When an electrical voltage difference is applied, pairs of porous carbon electrodes, positioned opposite each other, store ions. These electrodes can be stacked together in multiple pairs. The ions are extracted from the water, passing through a "spacer channel" between the two electrodes, and trapped in the carbon material's pores. This process involves forming electrical double-layered structures (EDLs) within the intraparticle pores.[17,18]
Compared to other desalination techniques, CDI offers several advantages, including low energy consumption, cost-effective operation, and the ability to remove various ions from water. CDI is also scalable, making it suitable for both small- and large-scale water treatment applications [19]. CDI shows excellent promise for desalination and water treatment, with potential applications in treating brackish water, seawater, and industrial effluent while effectively removing salt [20].
Membrane Capacitive Deionization (MCDI) is a water desalination method that uses two opposing porous electrodes to create an electric current. As water passes through a channel between the electrodes, ions are extracted and stored within the electrodes. Ion-exchange membranes are positioned in front of the electrodes to help flow counterions from the channel into the electrode while keeping coions inside the electrode structure [21,22].
MCDI has developed an enhanced theory to consider the electrostatic forces and double layers (EDLs) formed within the porous carbon particles of the electrodes. Additionally, our theory considers the role of the inter-particle pore space as a pathway for ion transport. By preventing the coions from leaving the electrode region in MCDI, the inter-particle porosity becomes a reservoir for salt storage [23]. This improvement in total salt capacity enhances the effectiveness of the porous electrode in MCDI. One of the advantages of MCDI is its ability to reverse the voltage during ion desorption, also known as ion release. This feature allows for increased capacity and faster salt uptake in the subsequent cycle by depleting the inter-particle porosity of counter ions. In this study, we assess the adsorption and desorption cycles of MCDI, both theoretically and experimentally, for desorption at zero voltage and with reversed voltage [24,25,26].

2. Materials and Methods

Capacitive Deionization (CDI) is a promising water treatment technology based on an electrochemical process for eliminating ions from water. This method is classified as a subtype of desalination technology. It has been gaining traction recently due to its reduced energy consumption and cost-effectiveness compared to other desalination techniques. The CDI approach applies an electrical potential across two porous electrodes separated by a spacer. Upon water flow through the electrodes, the ions in the water are drawn to the electrodes and deposited in the electrical double layer formed at the electrode surface. The concentration of ions in the water is reduced as they pass through the electrodes, resulting in deionized water [27].
This work focuses on designing, developing, producing CDI units and synthesizing activated carbon sheets. Evaluating its efficiency in different scenarios is crucial to exploring the potential of Capacitive deionization (CDI) for water desalination. Brackish or salty water contains salt ions that can be removed through a spacer channel with porous electrodes on either side. When a potential difference between the two electrodes is applied, cations (Na+) concentrate in the cathode while the anode absorbs anions (Cl). This process results in partially desalinated water. A concentrated salt product stream is discharged when the electrodes release ions over time, and the voltage is reduced or even reversed. Remember that ion-exchange membranes must be placed between the electrodes and the spacer to reverse the voltage in the membrane-C variation of CDI [28,29].
This study explores structural design guidelines for CDI setups that are simple to assemble, use, and maintain. The anode and cathode, two electrodes connected to a direct current power source, exhibit opposing positive and negative charges, respectively. The brackish or salty water from the tank was pumped into the CDI cell. The voltage was reversed to regenerate the electrodes after water deionization polluted both.
They were fabricated and assembled to design and manufacture the capacitive deionization (CDI) unit, illustrated in Figure 2.

2.2. The Apparatuses Used in This Study Are as Follows

2.2.1. D.C. Power Supply

A DC power source (XLN6024, made in Taiwan) is an electronic component that offers electrical power to an electronic device. The device acquires electrical energy from a power source. It converts the A.C. into D.C., which is crucial for the CDI cell to enable the electrolytic separation of salts from water. Furthermore, it regulates the voltage across different levels to explore the influence of electric potential on cellular functionality.

2.2.2. Peristaltic Pump

Peristaltic pumps (77800-60, made in Italy) are a type of positive displacement pump that employ the action of rotating rollers in contact with specialized flexible tubing to generate a flow under pressure. The tubing effectively segregates the fluid from the surrounding pump and its environment, thereby preventing contamination. This feature renders the tubing highly suitable for manipulating aggressive, corrosive, or abrasive substances. The roller mechanism also facilitates the low-shear pumping of fluids, particularly those sensitive to shear forces.

2.2.3. Tubular Furnace

An electric heating apparatus (TUBE-1400, made in China) is employed to conduct synthesis and purify inorganic compounds and, occasionally, inorganic synthesis. A potential design configuration entails the utilization of a cylindrical cavity encompassed by heating coils integrated within a thermally insulating matrix. Temperature regulation can be achieved by using feedback obtained from a thermocouple. Tube furnaces with multiple heating zones are commonly employed in transport experiments. Specific digital temperature controllers offer an RS232 interface, enabling users to program segments for various purposes such as ramping, soaking, sintering, and other applications.

2.2.4. Digital Balance

The digital mass balances utilized in general chemistry laboratories (DAM, made in the U.K.) are exact instruments employed to measure the weight of substances up to the milligram (0.001 g) level. It is imperative to handle them with caution and attentiveness. Employing appropriate containers to weigh chemicals and ensure that objects are weighed under ambient room temperature conditions is advisable. It is advisable to maintain the draft shields in a closed position. It is imperative to avoid any disruption or alteration to the instruments or their respective levels. It is essential to consistently maintain cleanliness near the pan by employing a sable brush for cleaning after use. Additionally, it is necessary to promptly notify the stockroom personnel of any spillage of liquids or solids onto the balance.

2.2.5. PH/EC/TDS Meter

A TDS meter (MW 802, made in Romania) can measure the total soluble solids in a solution. Precisely, it measures the concentration of solid particles that are dissolved within it, focusing on the existence of ionized particles such as minerals and salts. The solution's electrical conductivity (E.C.) is increased due to these dissolved particles. In a solution, dissolved particles increase the electrical conductivity (E.C.). This specific solution feature can calculate total dissolved solids (TDS). The E.C. is a helpful tool because it can measure ionized solids.

2.2.6. Vacuum Oven

The vacuum furnace (281A, made in the USA). It is a specialized furnace utilized to subject materials, particularly metals, to elevated temperatures, thereby facilitating various processes, including but not limited to brazing, sintering, and heat treatment. This furnace ensures high uniformity and minimal contamination during these operations.

2.2.7. Box Snow Industry

The ice generator (CIM24A60HZ, made in the U.K.) is the ice machine component responsible for the ice production. This encompasses the evaporator and any related drives, controls, and subframe components that play a direct role in the production and discharge of ice into storage. "ice generator" typically refers to the ice-making subsystem in isolation, excluding refrigeration components. An exceptionally' packaged ice machine' generally refers to a fully integrated apparatus encompassing refrigeration and control systems, necessitating solely connection to utility services.

2.2.8. Stirrer

A magnetic stirrer (Stuart SB162, made in the U.K.), also known as a magnetic mixer, is a laboratory instrument that utilizes the rotation of a magnetic field to induce rapid spinning of a stir bar, commonly referred to as a "flea," which is submerged in a liquid. This spinning motion effectively stirs the liquid. A rotating magnet or a collection of stationary electromagnets positioned beneath the liquid-filled vessel can generate a rotating field.

2.2.9. Grinder

Grinders (IP15AP, made in the U.K.) are deemed appropriate for achieving consistent sample preparation, essential for subsequent analysis within the context of quality assurance and Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). Additionally, grinders are also utilized in the process of preparing prescriptions and formulations. Challenging-to-comminute samples can be effectively processed in grinders through thermal manipulation, either by heating or cooling or by incorporating grinding aids.

2.3. Carbonization Process

The capacitive deionization electrode was constructed using natural materials in the study. "high pours" refers to pouring a substantial amount of liquid, typically a beverage. Water desalination was conducted utilizing carbon-activated nanomaterial or graphene oxide. In the present Investigation, various natural materials such as rice, peen, and sunflower husk were employed to create carbon-activated substances. Subsequently, these substances were utilized to construct CDI electrodes, which were integrated into the configuration of CDI desalination systems, as shown in the experimental procedure outlined in Figure 3.
The shells of sunflower seeds, peanuts, and grains were all finely ground. The product was dried at 200 degrees Celsius for 19 hours. The final step involved grounding the material and loading it into quartz boats. Carbonization finally occurred after heating the furnace to 700 degrees Celsius and keeping it there for an hour with a constant flow of 18 dm3/min of argon. After undergoing pyrolysis, the samples were again milled down to ground level. The resulting pH was neutral when the powder was washed with distilled water. After soaking in 1 mol/dm3 concentrated hydrochloric acid for 19 hours, the following procedures were carried out to neutralize the filtrate:

2.4. Chemical Activation

Five grams of carbon powder were combined with 140 milliliters of concentrated H2SO4, 15 grams of sodium nitrate, and 3 grams of potassium permanganate, which were added gradually while stirring for 90 minutes. Slowly, 230 milliliters of distilled water were incorporated, as illustrated in Figure 4.
The obtained A.C. or graphene oxide was filtered, washed to remove all traces of acid and then dried (under vacuum. During the activation process with potassium hydroxide, activated carbon with potassium hydroxide is oxidized in an alkaline medium with a lot of oxygen [26,30]. Carbon atoms are removed from the internal structure of carbon during vigorous activation with a lot of potassium hydroxide, increasing the surface area [31].

2.5. Electrode Sheet Fabrication

Activated carbon, a binder, and a conductive additive are added to the current collector before the electrode is produced by slip casting. Attaching the ACP to the current collector and giving it structural rigidity is the job of the polymeric (PVDF) binder. Binders, such as polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), are widely employed [32]. At 150 degrees Celsius, activated carbon powder, ethyl acetate, and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were mixed and agitated. Since excessive binder could diminish surface area by blocking access to pores, using the tiniest quantity necessary to give the electrode appropriate mechanical strength is standard practice. About 10% by weight (wt%) and describe PVDF [33]. Conductive binders and ACP have been slurried together in the suitable solvent to form a slurry. The Figure shows that the casting or coating procedure in the mold dimension can affect the CDI electrode's characteristics and properties. After casting, the electrode is dried at a high temperature, often in a vacuum, until the solvent completely evaporates [34]. Carbon sheet drying at 120 degrees Celsius for 2 hours. Vacuum oven drying at 80 degrees Celsius for 2 hours. For 24 hours, we treated it with a 1M KOH solution. Drying at 70 degrees Celsius in a vacuum for 6 hours after being washed with deionized water until the pH is neutral.[35] as shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6.

2.6. Description of Assembly Electrodes of CDI Cell

Figure 7 shows the CDI unit cell. Carbon electrodes are produced with dimensions 10x10 cm2 and are used as the anodes and cathodes. The capacitive deionization method has been modified by introducing membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI), whereby ion-exchange membranes are strategically placed in front of every carbon electrode. MCDI is reported to improve significantly desalination efficiency [36] because ions are selectively adsorbed onto the electrode surface by an ion-exchange membrane. The anode was formed by combining the anion-exchange membrane (AMX) with the carbon electrode. At the same time, the cathode was created by combining the carbon electrode with the cation-exchange membrane (CMX). [37] . A 20 µm thick spacer (a nylon net) was inserted between the ion-exchange membranes to form a flow channel for the influent. A 1cm hole was drilled in the center of the carbon electrode, which served as the outlet. The device was formed so that influent flows in from the edges of the carbon electrode, passes through the spacer, and then flows out through the drill hole in the center of the electrode.

2.7. Desalination Processes Using CDI Unit

A series of desalination processes were conducted using a CDI unit cell to evaluate the efficiency of CDI design performance, as illustrated in Figure 8. Various parameters were applied to measure the effectiveness of the CDI design.
For the desalination of brackish water with TDS concentrations between 200 and 5,000 ppm, capacitive deionization (CDI), a developing method, has shown potential to be cost-effective [38].To a cell made up of a pair of electrodes in CDI, a direct current (D.C.) voltage is supplied, giving the technology its name. Ions are adsorbed onto the charged electrode surfaces while saline water is circulated through the cell through an insulating spacer to prevent short circuits. This procedure is known as electrosorption since the applied voltage acts as the driving force for adsorption.
The applied voltage can be reduced or changed in polarity to cause the ions to be resorbed once the electrode surfaces are saturated with ions. Then, purified water and concentrated brine can be produced by switching between the adsorption (charge) and desorption (discharge) stages [39].

3. Desalination Experimental Procedures

Traditional CDI systems consist of two steps: a charge step in which a voltage is supplied, ions are adsorbed in the cell, and a discharge step in which the voltage changes in polarity or is shorted to eliminate the charged particles from the saturation electrodes. The circulation of saltwater through the CDI cell causes this to occur. Various parameters, such as flow velocity, temperature, applied voltage, and salt concentrations, influence the operation of conventional CDI systems.
According to the water treatment application, these operating parameters that impact the CDI system can occasionally be adjusted to obtain the required desalination performance or reduce the cost of water production. New operating modes, such as constant current rather than constant voltage, have also been developed to make CDI a more varied desalination technique.
The desalination process depends on many variables; we select the concentration of TDS, flow rate of feed and volt of electrodes in CDI.
The parameters were studied:-
  • The saline concentration of seawater TDS is measured at 500,1000,1500 and 2000 TDS.
  • Flow rate of feed 9.5, 16.8 and 38.2 ml/min.
  • The potential difference of the electrode is from a 1.5,2 and 2.5-volt interval of 1 min.

4. Results and Discussions

Traditional CDI systems consist of two steps: a charge step in which a voltage is supplied, ions are adsorbed in the cell, and a discharge step in which the voltage changes in polarity or is shorted to eliminate the charged particles from the saturation electrodes. Various parameters, such as flow velocity, temperature, applied voltage, and salt concentrations, influence the operation of conventional CDI systems.
According to the water treatment application, these operating parameters that impact the CDI system can occasionally be adjusted to obtain the required desalination performance or reduce the cost of water production. New operating modes, Techniques such as employing constant current instead of constant voltage, have been developed to enhance the versatility of CDI as a desalination method [40,41].

4.1. Effect of Concentration of TDS on Desalination

CDI technology is frequently tested in brackish water salinities below 2,000 ppm TDS. At these salinities, CDI technology is effective. According to adsorption isotherm models, salt adsorption capacity and the influent salt concentration should increase [42]. The charge efficacy decreases as the NaCl content increases, proving that low-saline water is best for CDI technologies. However, research has shown that the effect of NaCl content on charge efficacy is minimal, if not insignificant. The EDLC hypothesis predicts that higher salt concentrations will cause more ions to pass through the electrodes and a higher capacitance. A higher influent NaCl concentration significantly enhances the energy consumption and electrosorption kinetics of the desalination process because the water is more conductive [43] The ion species is particularly significant since salts other than NaCl are frequently present in source water matrices.
The TDS concentration affects the desalination process via CDI [44]. The different TDS concentrations in Figure 11 illustrate how the TDS ion concentration changes over time. The result shows that TDS increases at a flow rate of 25 ml/min, has a potential difference of 1.5 volts, and decreases from 2000 ppm to 1610 ppm after the anode and cathode have stabilized. The same rules apply for 1000 p.p.m. and 1500 p.p.m. with constant flow rates and different potentials. The relationship between the removal percentage and time for ions is shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10.

4.2. Effect of Flow Rate Feed on Desalination

In the experimental settings, the flow rate is crucial because it regulates how long the salt stays in contact with the electrodes. The effluent concentration is filtered more due to the saline water's lengthier contact with the electrodes and increased salt removal effectiveness at low flow rates [45]. The relationship between flow rate and energy consumption is inverse, although flow rate also has positive relationships with charge efficiency and salt adsorption capacity, as well as with both [46]. For the most efficient use of energy and salt removal, it was recommended that a pass CDI system with two sheets of activated carbon electrodes and electrode dimensions of 10 x 10 x 1 mm employ flow rates of 9.5, 16.8, and 38.2 ml/min. However, this optimal flow rate is 9.5 ml/min because of flow rate changes. Retention time, or the time the saline water is in contact with the electrode, has thus been advocated as a potential operating factor in place of flow rate. The flow rate input through CDI has an impact on the desalination process. The relationship between feed flow rate velocity and feed TDS decrease is shown in Figure 11 at 9.5 ml/min, corresponding to a sharp TDS decrease. This demonstrates the direct correlation when 38.2 ml/min exhibits a tiny reduction, which informs us that a low flow rate enables time for ions to be drawn to the anode and cathode. The relationship between the removal percentage and time for ions is shown in Figure 11 and Figure 12.
Preprints 119899 g011
Figure 11. Effect of different flow rates on desalination.
Figure 11. Effect of different flow rates on desalination.
Preprints 119899 g011
Preprints 119899 g012
Figure 12. indicates the relation between the removal % and time for ions and flow rate.
Figure 12. indicates the relation between the removal % and time for ions and flow rate.
Preprints 119899 g012

4.3. Effect of Potential Differences on Desalination

The desalination process is affected by potential electrode differences in CDI [47,48], as shown in Figure 13. It shows a sharp decrease in TDS at 2.5 and 2 volts, which appears to be the increase in volts that reduces TDS so fast [49]. Figure 15 indicates the relation between the removal % and time for ions. According to EDL theory, increasing the voltage applied to the CDI cell boosts the charge at the electrode-solution interface, promoting salt adsorption capacity. The capacity for absorbing salt rises exponentially from 0.6 V to 1.2 V rather than linearly with applied voltage. The salt adsorption capacity, however, does not appreciably increase above 1.2 V, most likely because of parasitic electrochemical processes [50]. The standard reduction potential (SRP) for water electrolysis at 1.23 V and data demonstrating that charge efficiency declines and specific energy consumption rises with increasing applied voltage support this. Different applied voltages have been reported to improve the various desalination parameters, including salt adsorption capacity, charge efficiency, specific energy consumption, and electrosorption rate. Based on their findings, [51] asserted that 1.2 V, which is only marginally lower than the SRP for water electrolysis, is the ideal point.
On the other hand, they used the response surface approach in their study and discovered that 1.57 V had the highest salt adsorption capacity [44]. More experiments revealed that 2.0 V produced the lowest specific energy usage, and 1.8 V produced the fastest electrosorption rate. For most CDI systems, an applied voltage of 1.0 to 2.0 V is suitable [52]. The performance of applied volt 2.5 is more efficient.
Preprints 119899 g013
Figure 13. Effect of different potential differences on desalination.
Figure 13. Effect of different potential differences on desalination.
Preprints 119899 g013
Preprints 119899 g014
Figure 14. indicates the relation between the removal and time for ions.
Figure 14. indicates the relation between the removal and time for ions.
Preprints 119899 g014

4.4. Regeneration of CDI Electrode

When we observe an increase in TDS, we change the electrode by changing the anode to the cathode and vice, which leads to the repulsion of ions deposited on the electrode, as Figure 15 shows a sharp and sudden increase in TDS for a while after that we notice decreased slow graded this shows the readiness of the electrode into a new desalination process we also note there is a relationship between low voltage [53] and TDS low voltage gives us a good regeneration.
Preprints 119899 g015
Figure 15. Regeneration of CDI Electrode.
Figure 15. Regeneration of CDI Electrode.
Preprints 119899 g015

5. Conclusions

There are various sources of carbon black from natural agricultural materials, such as rice husks, peanut shells, and sunflower husks. CDI desalination technology is relatively inexpensive compared to other methods. Several factors influence water desalination, including electrode material, total dissolved solids (TDS), flow rate, and voltage. The average efficiency at a constant TDS of 750 ppm, voltage of 1.5 V, and varying flow rates of 9.5, 16.8, and 38.2 ml/min is 36%, 24%, and 8%, respectively. At a constant flow rate of 9.5 ml/min and TDS of 500 ppm, the efficiencies at voltages of 2 V and 2.5 V are 34% and 44%.

Author Contributions

Methodology; Validation.; Formal analysis; Investigation; Resources, analysis I greed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries may be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding of the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia, through Project Number GSSRD-24.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. M.H.A. Aldossary, S. Ahmad, A.A. Bahraq, Effect of total dissolved solids-contaminated water on the properties of concrete, Journal of Building Engineering 32 (2020) 101496.
  2. M.Y.A. Khan, M. El Kashouty, W. Gusti, A. Kumar, A.M. Subyani, A. Alshehri, Geo-temporal signatures of physicochemical and heavy metals pollution in Groundwater of Khulais region—Makkah Province, Saudi Arabia, Frontiers in Environmental Science 9 (2022) 800517.
  3. Y. Zhao, X.-m. Hu, B.-h. Jiang, L. Li, Optimization of the operational parameters for desalination with response surface methodology during a capacitive deionization process, Desalination 336 (2014) 64-71.
  4. M.A. Ahmed, S. Tewari, Capacitive deionization: Processes, materials and state of the technology, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 813 (2018) 178-192.
  5. J. Wang, J. Dai, Z. Jiang, B. Chu, F. Chen, Recent Progress and prospect of flow-electrode electrochemical desalination system, Desalination 504 (2021) 114964.
  6. W. Xing, J. Liang, W. Tang, D. He, M. Yan, X. Wang, Y. Luo, N. Tang, M. Huang, Versatile applications of capacitive deionization (CDI)-based technologies, Desalination 482 (2020) 114390.
  7. S.-J. Seo, H. Jeon, J.K. Lee, G.-Y. Kim, D. Park, H. Nojima, J. Lee, S.-H. Moon, Investigation on removal of hardness ions by capacitive deionization (CDI) for water softening applications, Water research 44(7) (2010) 2267-2275.
  8. M.A. Anderson, A.L. Cudero, J. Palma, Capacitive deionization as an electrochemical means of saving energy and delivering clean water. Comparison to present desalination practices: Will it compete?, Electrochimica Acta 55(12) (2010) 3845-3856.
  9. J. Choi, P. Dorji, H.K. Shon, S. Hong, Applications of capacitive deionization: Desalination, softening, selective removal, and energy efficiency, Desalination 449 (2019) 118-130.
  10. M.A.A. Shahmirzadi, S.S. Hosseini, J. Luo, I. Ortiz, Significance, evolution and recent advances in adsorption technology, materials and processes for desalination, water softening and salt removal, Journal of environmental management 215 (2018) 324-344.
  11. K. Laxman, M.T.Z. Myint, M. Al Abri, P. Sathe, S. Dobretsov, J. Dutta, Desalination and disinfection of inland brackish ground water in a capacitive deionization cell using nanoporous activated carbon cloth electrodes, Desalination 362 (2015) 126-132.
  12. K. Jeong, N. Yoon, S. Park, M. Son, J. Lee, J. Park, K.H. Cho, Optimization of a nanofiltration and membrane capacitive deionization (NF-MCDI) hybrid system: Experimental and modeling studies, Desalination 493 (2020) 114658.
  13. S.S. Gupta, M.R. Islam, T. Pradeep, Capacitive Deionization (CDI): An alternative cost-efficient desalination technique, Advances in water purification techniques, Elsevier2019, pp. 165-202.
  14. K.S. Lee, Y. Cho, K.Y. Choo, S. Yang, M.H. Han, D.K. Kim, Membrane-spacer assembly for flow-electrode capacitive deionization, Applied Surface Science 433 (2018) 437-442.
  15. A. Rommerskirchen, Y. Gendel, M. Wessling, Single module flow-electrode capacitive deionization for continuous water desalination, Electrochemistry Communications 60 (2015) 34-37.
  16. S.K. Patel, M. Qin, W.S. Walker, M. Elimelech, Energy efficiency of electro-driven brackish water desalination: Electrodialysis significantly outperforms membrane capacitive deionization, Environmental science & technology 54(6) (2020) 3663-3677.
  17. J. Jang, Y. Kang, J.-H. Han, K. Jang, C.-M. Kim, I.S. Kim, Developments and future prospects of reverse electrodialysis for salinity gradient power generation: Influence of ion exchange membranes and electrodes, Desalination 491 (2020) 114540.
  18. M. Liu, M. He, J. Han, Y. Sun, H. Jiang, Z. Li, Y. Li, H. Zhang, Recent Advances in Capacitive Deionization: Research Progress and Application Prospects, Sustainability, 2022.
  19. F. Yu, Y. Yang, X. Zhang, J. Ma, Application of capacitive deionization in drinking water purification, Separation and Purification Technology 354 (2025) 129285.
  20. S. Ntakirutimana, W. Tan, M.A. Anderson, Y. Wang, Editors' Choice—Review—Activated carbon electrode design: Engineering tradeoff with respect to capacitive deionization performance, Journal of The Electrochemical Society 167(14) (2020) 143501.
  21. P.M. Biesheuvel, R. Zhao, S. Porada, A. Van der Wal, Theory of membrane capacitive deionization including the effect of the electrode pore space, Journal of colloid and interface science 360(1) (2011) 239-248.
  22. R. Zhao, P.M. Biesheuvel, A. Van der Wal, Energy consumption and constant current operation in membrane capacitive deionization, Energy & Environmental Science 5(11) (2012) 9520-9527.
  23. Q. Xiao, J. Ma, L. Xu, K. Zuo, H. Guo, C.Y. Tang, Membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) for selective ion separation and recovery: Fundamentals, challenges, and opportunities, Journal of Membrane Science 699 (2024) 122650.
  24. J.G. Gamaethiralalage, K. Singh, S. Sahin, J. Yoon, M. Elimelech, M.E. Suss, P. Liang, P.M. Biesheuvel, R.L. Zornitta, L. De Smet, Recent advances in ion selectivity with capacitive deionization, Energy & Environmental Science 14(3) (2021) 1095-1120.
  25. T. Kim, J.E. Dykstra, S. Porada, A. Van Der Wal, J. Yoon, P.M. Biesheuvel, Enhanced charge efficiency and reduced energy use in capacitive deionization by increasing the discharge voltage, Journal of colloid and interface science 446 (2015) 317-326.
  26. Z. He, Y. Li, Y. Wang, C.J. Miller, J. Fletcher, B. Lian, T.D. Waite, Insufficient desorption of ions in constant-current membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI): Problems and solutions, Water Research 242 (2023) 120273.
  27. Z. Liu, X. Shang, H. Li, Y. Liu, A Brief Review on High-Performance Capacitive Deionization Enabled by Intercalation Electrodes, Global Challenges 5(1) (2021) 2000054.
  28. Z. Hao, X. Sun, J. Chen, X. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Recent Progress and Challenges in Faradic Capacitive Desalination: From Mechanism to Performance, Small (2023) 2300253.
  29. G. Ling, History of the membrane (Pump) theory of the living cell from its beginning in mid-19th century to its disproof 45 years ago--though still taught worldwide today as established truth, Physiological chemistry and physics and medical NMR 39(1) (2007) 1-68.
  30. Z. Song, Z. Wei, B. Wang, Z. Luo, S. Xu, W. Zhang, H. Yu, M. Li, Z. Huang, J. Zang, Sensitive room-temperature H2S gas sensors employing SnO2 quantum wire/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites, Chemistry of Materials 28(4) (2016) 1205-1212.
  31. A. Ahmadpour, D.D. Do, The preparation of active carbons from coal by chemical and physical activation, Carbon 34(4) (1996) 471-479.
  32. J. Xie, Y. Xue, M. He, W. Luo, H. Wang, R. Wang, Y.-M. Yan, Organic-inorganic hybrid binder enhances capacitive deionization performance of activated-carbon electrode, Carbon 123 (2017) 574-582.
  33. G. Ruano Torres, Conducting polymers and hybrid materials for technological applications, (2021).
  34. L. Wu, M. Liu, S. Huo, X. Zang, M. Xu, W. Ni, Z. Yang, Y.-M. Yan, Mold-casting prepared free-standing activated carbon electrodes for capacitive deionization, Carbon 149 (2019) 627-636.
  35. J.-H. Choi, Fabrication of a carbon electrode using activated carbon powder and application to the capacitive deionization process, Separation and Purification Technology 70(3) (2010) 362-366.
  36. Demirer, Two different perspectives on capacitive deionization process: performance optimization and flow visualization, (2013).
  37. A. Omosebi, X. Gao, N. Holubowitch, Z. Li, J. Landon, K. Liu, Anion exchange membrane capacitive deionization cells, Journal of The Electrochemical Society 164(9) (2017) E242.
  38. L. Liu, X. Guo, R. Tallon, X. Huang, J. Chen, Highly porous N-doped graphene nanosheets for rapid removal of heavy metals from water by capacitive deionization, Chemical Communications 53(5) (2017) 881-884.
  39. M. Liu, Z. Xue, H. Zhang, Y. Li, Dual-channel membrane capacitive deionization based on asymmetric ion adsorption for continuous water desalination, Electrochemistry Communications 125 (2021) 106974.
  40. S. Dahiya, B.K. Mishra, Enhancing understandability and performance of flow electrode capacitive deionisation by optimizing configurational and operational parameters: A review on recent Progress, Separation and Purification Technology 240 (2020) 116660.
  41. F. Yu, Z. Yang, Y. Cheng, S. Xing, Y. Wang, J. Ma, A comprehensive review on flow-electrode capacitive deionization: Design, active material and environmental application, Separation and Purification Technology 281 (2022) 119870.
  42. J. Park, J. Kim, S. Lee, J.H. Kim, M.-H. Yoon, D. Lee, S.J. Yoo, Unraveling concentration-dependent solvation structures and molecular interactions in water-in-salt electrolytes for enhanced performance of electric double-layer capacitors, Energy Storage Materials 65 (2024) 103137.
  43. T.-C. Chung, Evaluating the desalination performance and efficiency of capacitive deionization with activated carbon electrodes, (2018).
  44. S. Porada, R. Zhao, A. van der Wal, V. Presser, P.M. Biesheuvel, Review on the science and technology of water desalination by capacitive deionization, Progress in materials science 58(8) (2013) 1388-1442.
  45. . Zhang, D. He, J. Ma, W. Tang, T.D. Waite, Comparison of faradaic reactions in flow-through and flow-by capacitive deionization (CDI) systems, Electrochimica Acta 299 (2019) 727-735.
  46. A. Rommerskirchen, B. Ohs, K.A. Hepp, R. Femmer, M. Wessling, Modeling continuous flow-electrode capacitive deionization processes with ion-exchange membranes, Journal of membrane science 546 (2018) 188-196.
  47. E. Avraham, M. Noked, I. Cohen, A. Soffer, D. Aurbach, The dependence of the desalination performance in capacitive deionization processes on the electrodes PZC, Journal of The Electrochemical Society 158(12) (2011) P168.
  48. Avraham, Y. Bouhadana, A. Soffer, D. Aurbach, Long term stability of capacitive deionization processes for water desalination: The challenge of positive electrodes corrosion, Electrochimica Acta 106 (2013) 91-100.
  49. Y. Bouhadana, M. Ben-Tzion, A. Soffer, D. Aurbach, A control system for operating and investigating reactors: the demonstration of parasitic reactions in the water desalination by capacitive deionization, Desalination 268(1-3) (2011) 253-261.
  50. X. Zeng, Z. Wang, A. Rehman, Electrode–Electrolyte Interfacial Processes in Ionic Liquids and Sensor Applications, Electrochemistry in Ionic Liquids: Volume 1: Fundamentals (2015) 7-74.
  51. R.L. Zornitta, J.J. Lado, M.A. Anderson, L.A.M. Ruotolo, Effect of electrode properties and operational parameters on capacitive deionization using low-cost commercial carbons, Separation and Purification Technology 158 (2016) 39-52.
  52. H.-H. Jung, S.-W. Hwang, S.-H. Hyun, K.-H. Lee, G.-T. Kim, Capacitive deionization characteristics of nanostructured carbon aerogel electrodes synthesized via ambient drying, Desalination 216(1-3) (2007) 377-385.
  53. S. Bakly, Treatment of agricultural run-off using innovative CDI filtration techniques, (2019).
Preprints 119899 g001Preprints 119899 g002
Figure 2. (a) Assembly of CDI parts (b) Inside view section for CDI.
Figure 2. (a) Assembly of CDI parts (b) Inside view section for CDI.
Preprints 119899 g001Preprints 119899 g002
Preprints 119899 g003
Figure 3. Nature materials before carbonization and after carbonization (a) Peanut peels (b) Rice peels (c) Sunflower peel.
Figure 3. Nature materials before carbonization and after carbonization (a) Peanut peels (b) Rice peels (c) Sunflower peel.
Preprints 119899 g003
Preprints 119899 g004
Figure 4. The procedures and steps of activating chemical carbon.
Figure 4. The procedures and steps of activating chemical carbon.
Preprints 119899 g004
Preprints 119899 g005
Figure 5. Preparation of electrode sheets by slip casting onto mold 10cmx10cm.
Figure 5. Preparation of electrode sheets by slip casting onto mold 10cmx10cm.
Preprints 119899 g005
Preprints 119899 g006
Figure 6. Steps of syntheses of electrode sheet from raw materials.
Figure 6. Steps of syntheses of electrode sheet from raw materials.
Preprints 119899 g006
Preprints 119899 g007
Figure 7. Assembly of two electrode sheets and membrane inside the CDI cell.
Figure 7. Assembly of two electrode sheets and membrane inside the CDI cell.
Preprints 119899 g007
Preprints 119899 g008
Figure 8. Schematic diagram of Desalination process by CDI (a) general processes (b) charge and recharge.
Figure 8. Schematic diagram of Desalination process by CDI (a) general processes (b) charge and recharge.
Preprints 119899 g008
Preprints 119899 g009
Figure 9. Effect of different concentrations on desalination.
Figure 9. Effect of different concentrations on desalination.
Preprints 119899 g009
Preprints 119899 g010
Figure 10. indicates the relation between the removal % and time for ions.
Figure 10. indicates the relation between the removal % and time for ions.
Preprints 119899 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated