Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Heparin Resistance on ECMO: A Review

Altmetrics

Downloads

88

Views

59

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

09 October 2024

Posted:

09 October 2024

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Heparin resistance (HR) on ECMO exacerbates bleeding and thrombogenesis. So far, there is no universal definition of HR on ECMO and no unified strategy for the assessment of heparin efficacy in ECMO patients. The most frequent discrepancy in defining HR is the difference in reported doses: units per day (U/d) or per kilogram per hour (U/kg/h). Another disagreement occurs ow-ing to different ways of measuring UFH efficacy, contributing to further disagreement in a com-mon definition of HR. Due to numerous processes that start with ECMO initiation, including protein layer formation on the surface of the circuits, recruitment of immune cells, activation of complement and contact activation systems, and platelets, the assessment of pure antithrombin consumption is complicated. Moreover, there is an alternative anticoagulation performed by a serine protease inhibitor named Heparin Cofactor II, the contribution of which could also be measured on heparin consumption. Considering simultaneously launched processes of inflam-mation and thrombogenesis in response to contact with artificial surfaces on ECMO, we listed possible mechanisms contributing to additional antithrombin consumption. The effect of the flow on the platelets activation and vWF assembly was also described. We examined the literature from Pubmed and Embase to find possible definitions of heparin resistance on ECMO among pediatric and adult cohorts. We extracted 13 records with different HR assessment approaches and sug-gested our vision of delineating HR on ECMO.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Emergency Medicine

1. Introduction

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a continuous non-physiological blood transportation system that consists of artificially coated tubes and an oxygenator that has an extended area of contact with the blood [1,2]. In addition, the pressure generated by a centrifugal pump changes the physiological pattern of the blood flow [3]. When blood comes into contact with foreign surfaces, numerous effects are observed, such as protein adsorption and the activation and precipitation of the complement system, thrombocytes, and leukocytes along the extracorporeal circuits, leading to inflammation and thrombogenesis [4,5,6,7,8]. Bedside anticoagulation, which is usually achieved through the titration of unfractionated heparin (UFH), is essential, as it interferes with thrombogenesis along the circuit, in the oxygenator, and in the pump itself [9]. However, extended ECMO exploitation requires the long-term use of heparin, which may ultimately lead to heparin resistance (HR) due to the depletion of antithrombin as a result of the inflammatory response and coagulopathy [10]. The higher heparin doses required to meet the necessary anticoagulation parameters may cause undesirable bleeding [10]. Hence, to achieve a satisfactory balance between bleeding and thrombosis on ECMO, a deep understanding of the changes in hemostasis is required. In this review, we focused on heparin resistance resulting from continuous UFH exposure during ECMO.

2. Issues Associated with Defining Heparin Resistance

Heparin resistance is a condition in which standard doses of UFH are unable to facilitate satisfactory levels of anticoagulation. However, a more precise definition has yet to be established [11]. The initial ambiguity in defining heparin resistance in patients treated with ECMO arises from the definition of standard UFH doses, as dosages can be measured in units per day (U/d) or in units per kilogram per hour (U/kg/h), with the latter taking the patient’s weight into account. According to a recent survey conducted by Levy et al., the most popular UFH dose considered indicative of HR is >35,000 U/d [12], though other researchers have identified the presence of HR at UFH doses >40–70 U/kg/h [13,14]. These discrepancies introduce significant uncertainty with regard to the definition of a standard dose of UFH. Another ambiguity arises due to the different goals of heparin administration. Cardiac surgery patients on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and intensive care patients require different loading doses; thus, defining a standard UFH dose leading to HR becomes more complex. Patients on CPB demand an activated clotting time (ACT) > 480 s. If this target cannot be achieved at a UFH dose of 500 U/kg, HR is suspected [15]. In comparison, in patients on ECMO, the anticoagulation target is an ACT span within 180–220 s after initial UFH rates at 7.5–20 units/kg/h, followed by further elevation to achieve a therapeutic effect at the rate of 20–50 units/kg/h [16]. For comparison, if an adult weighing sixty kilograms receives a dose of 50 units/kg/h per day, the total daily dose of heparin reaches 72,000 U/d, which is two times higher than the current definition of HR dose being 35,000 U/d.
Further uncertainty emerges from the coagulation measurement methods. ACT cannot be used to measure clot strength but is applied as an instantaneous assessment of fibrin clot formation at a certain moment in time. The concentration of intrinsic pathway components, the availability of platelets’ phospholipids to activate coagulation, temperature, and ACT machinery all influence ACT, leading to deviations when it comes to assessing the efficacy of heparin. However, ACT is appropriate for assessing the response to heparin in dynamics [17]. Despite the quick response offered by the ACT method, traditionally, the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and anti-Xa assay have been the preferred methods of assessing heparin’s efficacy, and a recent survey showed that the APTT and chromogenic anti-Xa assay had almost equal applicability for UFH monitoring [12]. Although the anti-Xa assay is generally preferred, the APTT is still widely applied in critically ill patients on ECMO. The chromogenic anti-Xa assay measures the direct inhibition of Xa by heparin, reflecting its sole anticoagulation effect. During the test, heparin binds to the patient’s antithrombin (AT) and inactivates a fixed amount of an external Xa. The inactivated Xa then couples with the chromogen in the luminescent reaction, allowing for the direct deduction of the amount of Xa that is inactivated by the heparin–AT complex. However, the anti-Xa assay does not assess the formation of the clot itself. In patients receiving ECMO, when UFH is administered, anti-Xa activity should be maintained at 0.3–0.7 IU/mL [18]. If the anti-Xa level is less than 0.3 IU/mL, it is necessary to administer supplementary heparin with a 10%–20% dose elevation [17]. If the anti-Xa level remains subtherapeutic, the patient should be checked for signs of AT replenishment or transitioned to another anticoagulant such as direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) [18]. The APTT, in turn, assesses the time it takes to form a clot after the activation of factor XII until the formation of the clot [17,19]. This test assesses the functionality of the intrinsic and common pathways, as well as the effect of heparin on the coagulation cascades. Factor VIII and fibrinogen are overexpressed during the inflammatory state; thus, the true anticoagulant activity of heparin could be masked in critically ill patients under the condition of pseudo heparin resistance, where, due to elevated factor VIII and fibrinogen, APTT values demonstrate subtherapeutic concentrations [19]. In patients on ECMO, APTT values should be in the range of 60–90 s [17]. If a subtherapeutic APTT level persists, the anti-Xa level should be checked, and appropriate management should be undertaken [18].

3. Incidence of Heparin Resistance

We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for the following medical subject headings (MeSH): “heparin resistance”/exp OR “heparin resistance” AND “extracorporeal oxygenation”/exp OR “extracorporeal oxygenation”. We extracted 13 records, including original studies, case reports, and case series, which described the phenomenon of heparin resistance in patients on ECMO who were initially prescribed UFH, which was then replaced or used in combination with another anticoagulant approach if necessary (Table 1).
The first study mentions the development of HR in a 12-year-old child, which manifested as an inability to reach the therapeutic anti-Xa concentration at a UFH dose of 25 units/kg/h and as formation of the thrombus in the circuit. To ensure proper anticoagulation was achieved, the patient was switched to bivalirudin [32]. More than half of participants taking UFH were subjected to thrombogenesis. The largest study on this topic thus far defined HR in terms of the dose per day and the dose per patient’s weight, e.g., >35,000 IU/d and >20 IU/kg/h, respectively. The incidence of HR reached 23% (47/197). Notably, in this study, HR was not associated with thrombogenesis; rather, increased thrombogenicity was associated with the VA-ECMO type and with COVID-19 [21]. The second largest study analyzed the remaining deficiency in AT after its replenishment. Of 2028 AT measurements from 191 pediatric patients (median age of 65 days), 43.3% showed signs of AT deficiency whilst they were on ECMO [14]. After AT replenishment, 36% of cases remained AT-deficient, which emphasized the importance of establishing an AT replenishment protocol if UFH is selected as the anticoagulant agent. AT replenishment was performed in neonates at AT < 50%, while in the elder cohort, it was administered at AT < 80%. In this study, HR was defined by subtherapeutic anti-Xa activity, or by UFH doses exceeding 40 units/kg/h. Another record later defined HR as a failure to reach the required anti-Xa level when the UFH dose was equal to 26 IU/kg/h [22]. Out of 27 pediatric patients, only 1 developed HR and was subsequently switched to bivalirudin. The study compared UFH and bivalirudin anticoagulants administered during ECMO treatment; the heparin group showed a higher incidence of bleeding (observed in 44% of cases vs. 12.5%) but fewer events of thrombosis (observed in 11% of cases vs. 25%). Neonates have decreased AT levels, and it may take up to six months for the AT structure to fully develop [33]. Thus, some hospitals prefer to use bivalirudin as a safe alternative to UFH in infants. Another study that defined HR described a case in which UFH > 35,000 IU/d was observed in a patient diagnosed with COVID-19 and placed on ECMO due to respiratory failure [23]. Required APTT and ACT goals were reached only after argatroban was prescribed as an additional anticoagulant therapy. In a study by Raghunathan et al., half of the 67-patient cohort experienced HR for at least one day during the course of ECMO therapy. HR was defined by a UFH ≥ 35,000 IU/d. Interestingly, there was no difference in the bleeding, thrombosis and survival between those with and without HR [24]. An increase in the infusion rate of heparin was successfully implemented to manage all cases of HR. Another study that supported a patient-related agreement between APTT and anti-Xa when the fibrinogen level and factor VIII were greatly elevated (7.5 g/L and 606% respectively) defined HR in the adult cohort as UFH > 35,000 IU/d, with an HR incidence of 33%. In the investigation that compared HR in pediatric and adult cohorts simultaneously, HR was defined at a subtherapeutic anti-Xa level where the doses of UFH equal to 23.6 units/kg/h and 15.3 units/kg/h were monitored accordingly. AT replenishment ameliorated anti-Xa concentration, but no significant reduction in UFH infusion was observed [28]. The remaining studies defined HR as UFH > 40 units/kg/h, > 24,000 IU/d, and in one instance, HR was detected with the subtherapeutic APTT with an UFH dose equal to 32 units/kg/h [29,30,31]. Out of the 13 manuscripts in which the condition of HR on ECMO was mentioned, 4 (30.7%) records mentioned HR when the daily UFH was > 35,000 IU/d. Another four (30.7%) records defined HR as when the anti-Xa concentration failed to reach the 0.30–0.7 U/mL therapeutic reference. Two (15%) studies defined HR as a UFH dose of > 40 units/kg/h and one of them used subtherapeutic anti-Xa as an indication of HR. A single record (7.6%) set the dose for HR as UFH > 24,000 IU/d. One study used a subtherapeutic APTT (7.6%) as a reference, while two studies relied on an inability to reach therapeutic ACT values (15%). DTIs were used as alternative anticoagulants. Bivalirudin was used in four cases (30.7%), while argatroban was used once (7.6%) as an additional anticoagulant to ensure that APTT and ACT targets were reached. One study resolved HR by increasing the UFH dose [24].

4. Origins of Heparin Resistance

Although the nature of HR is multifaceted, in most cases, it is defined by the failure to achieve the anticipated effect of UFH in patients as a result of underlying thrombogenesis, inflammation, and the increased depletion of AT [12]. AT participates in many biological processes that may lead to its reduction; for example, it is the main heparin coupling molecule that achieves a widespread anticoagulant effect. Heparin acts by unfolding the structure of AT, a serine protease inhibitor. This conformational change significantly increases the inactivation effect of the heparin–AT complex on factor Xa, thrombin, and several coagulation factors, thereby impeding clot formation [34]. Mainly targeting Xa and thrombin, to a lesser degree, the heparin–AT complex inhibits factor IXa, XIIa, and VIIa in vitro and in ex vivo mouse models [35,36]. When UFH is administered, the physiological expenditure of AT takes place. Only approximately one-third of UFH mixed chains contain the pentasaccharide domain that can bind AT, reinforcing its anticoagulant effect [37,38]. Early hemostasis experiments showed a thirty percent decline in AT concentration in 24 patients undergoing heparin treatment, regardless of the primary level of AT [39]. Initial AT concentrations were restored only several days after the completion of the treatment. In addition to its anti-thrombogenic activity, AT has anti-inflammatory effects and interacts with both heparin sulfate and endogenous glycosaminoglycans [40]. Prostaglandins produced by the endothelium upon contact with AT decrease the extent of leukocyte extravasation and attenuate thrombocyte activation [41,42,43,44]. AT interacts with the heparan sulfate chain of transmembrane syndecan-4 proteoglycan located on the surface of neutrophils and slows down their chemokine-induced migration [45]. Furthermore, AT’s involvement in mitigating NF-кB transcription leads to the reduced expression of inflammatory mediators such as IL-6, TNF-alpha, and tissue factor (tF) [40]. Thus far, we have listed the factors that contribute to AT consumption; however, there are also several mechanisms that are responsible for heparin availability. The physiological neutralization of UFH by plasma proteins was observed in the experiments with low- and high-affinity heparin towards factor Xa [46,47]. UFH molecules with molecular weights higher than 6000 Da can bind plasma proteins. When low-affinity heparin molecules were added, high-affinity heparin molecules were displaced, achieving the required anticoagulation in a dose-dependent manner that stabilized after six hours [46,47]. These observations show that the reversible binding of UFH represents an essential anticoagulation quotient when it comes to stabilizing the response towards continuous heparin infusion in terms of the diverse extent of binding towards plasma proteins. Heparin availability also depends on the state of the thrombocytes’ activation. When a platelet is activated, the released substance platelet-factor 4 counteracts the heparin molecule [48]. Under flow generated by ECMO, platelets are activated; the longer the duration, the higher the extent of platelet activation [4,49]. Thus, more platelet-factor 4 molecules interact with heparin, contributing to UFH consumption. In a series of cases, patients undergoing CPB with a platelet concentration exceeding 600 mcL exhibited HR [48]. Several studies have also proposed a preoperative high platelet level as a potential prognostic parameter for patients developing postoperative HR [50]. In addition to their well-established anticoagulant activity, endogenous heparin possesses anti-inflammatory properties. Endogenously, heparin is produced and released by basophils and mast cells [51]. Experiments conducted with glycosaminoglycans released from rat peritoneal mast cells demonstrated reduced concentrations of leukocytes in the peritoneum, as well as the decreased migration of leukocytes towards inflammatory stimuli [52]. Tang et al. used a mouse model to demonstrate that heparin hindered the HMGB1-mediated entrance of bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) into the cell, preventing the activation of caspase 11, which leads to the lysis of the cell [53]. A similar outcome was proposed in a human model [54]. One of the largest ACUTE II studies assessed the anti-inflammatory property of UFH and demonstrated a decrease in c-reactive protein (CRP) after the initiation of UFH treatment [55]. Hence, heparin expenditure also occurs for anti-inflammatory purposes. Finally, there is an equally important HR concept that depends on false diagnosis. As mentioned earlier in this review, acute phase proteins expressed during the inflammatory response, such as fibrinogen and factor VIII, may reduce aPTT measurement while a therapeutic dose of heparin is attained [48]. A study involving 13 patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy titrated the UFH concentration, relying on postoperative APPT and anti-Xa assay values. One-third of aPTT measurements showed a decline in laboratory values, suggesting HR, in comparison with the anti-Xa assay, although therapeutic dosages of UFH were achieved [56]. Therefore, in the presence of concomitant elevated heparin consumption due to thrombogenesis and inflammation in patients on ECMO, an anti-Xa assay remains the preferable choice for measuring the effect of heparin, since it does not rely on the concentration of acute phase proteins [19]. False laboratory ACT and APTT values may also be influenced by hypothermia, hemodilution, a low platelet count, and aprotinin administration [10,57].

4.1. Heparin, Antithrombin, and Heparin Cofactor II

The heparin molecule is a negatively charged glycosaminoglycan with an average molecular weight of 15 kDa [58]. UFH is a mixture of glycosaminoglycans in which the molecular weight varies from 5 kDa to 30 kDa, i.e., 5–35 units, obtained from animals’ intestinal mucosa, which contains plenty of mast cells [10]. The basic function of heparin is to enhance the anticoagulant effect of AT. Only one-third of UFH mixtures possess a pentasaccharide string to bind AT. The minimal sequence length of the heparin molecule to bind AT, Xa, and IIa is 18 subunits. A sequence with a length < 18 units can bind Xa but not thrombin [10]. UFH interacts with Xa and IIa through AT in a one-to-one ratio [55]. The diversification of heparin molecules in a UFH mixture, regardless of the normalization from the manufacturer, could be a potential cause of varying patient responses [10]. Most of the anticoagulant activity of heparin is antithrombin-dependent. However, antithrombin-independent anticoagulant activity also exists and is achieved through heparin cofactor II (HCII) [10]. HCII is a serine protease inhibitor that binds thrombin in a one-to-one ratio [59]. When the heparin molecule binds HCII, the effect of thrombin inhibition rises substantially from 5 min to 50 ms [60]. Structurally, it has one-third similarity to AT, which is heparin cofactor I [61]. The optimal polysaccharide length of heparin to bind HC II should exceed 24 units. When the heparin level exceeds 2 U/mL, HCII can inhibit even a thrombin bound to fibrin, which usually cannot be targeted by heparin–AT conjugation [62]. A blood concentration of HCII constitutes approximately 1 µM [63], whilst the AT concentration is approximately 2.5 µM [64]. Three-quarters of the whole anticoagulant activity is attributed to AT, while the rest is conducted through an AT-independent pathway, i.e., via HCII facilitation [65]. Although most of the literature considers the condition of heparin resistance from the perspective of antithrombin consumption, further investigation is needed to identify the unique role of HCII when prolonged exposure to heparin is required.

4.2. Material of ECMO Linings

ECMO linings consist of a plastic named polymerized vinyl chloride (PVC), which is a synthetic chemical that is fused with an ester plasticizer such as diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) to ensure the flexibility of circuits [66,67]. In this mixture, DEHP comprises up to 40% by weight [66] and is released into the blood circulation [68]. DEHP may lead to carcinogenic, reproductive, and developmental toxicity, and its use should be carefully considered in terms of the potential exposure to neonates or pregnant and breastfeeding patients [68,69]. The search for safer alternatives is currently underway and requires further scaling [67].
In most ECMO tubes, the inner surface of the tube linings is covered with heparin to reduce inflammation and thrombogenesis [3]. Several studies have described the effect of heparinized ECMO circuits. A recent case report demonstrated the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in a patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). HIT occurred on the twelfth day after ECMO initiation, leading to thrombocytopenia and the formation of HIT antibodies, although UFH was not introduced into circulation [70]. Although the thrombocytes normalized after the ECMO circuit was replaced, the patient did not survive. A heparinized coating for ECMO has proven beneficial for patients predisposed to bleeding. A very recent transplantation case series demonstrated the heparin-free placement of a patient on ECMO as a bridge to lung transplantation [71]. These cases demonstrated the successful management of ECMO performance without UFH infusion, although the circuits of ECMO were heparinized and AT activity was accurately monitored to avoid HR [71].

4.3. Plasma Components and Oxygenator

A membrane oxygenator constitutes the most extensive area of contact with the blood, which may reach 0.8–2.5 m2 [72,73]. Currently, oxygenators are made either from polymethylpentene or polypropylene material, while the prior generations were silicon-based [74]. Polymethylpentene is preferred, since polypropylene fibers result in plasma leakage when a gas exchange takes place in the membrane oxygenator [7,75]. Most of the studies that investigated the interaction between blood and oxygenator considered an oxygenator covered with polymethylpentene material [76]. Early studies showed that a silicon membrane oxygenator precipitates fibrinogen, albumin, IgG, platelets, fibronectin, and von Willebrand factor (vWF) [16,77]. Later studies involving polymethylpentene oxygenators were shown to precipitate fibrin, platelets, erythrocytes, leukocytes, and vWF on the surface of the oxygenator [5,6,7]. Polymethylpentene is a hydrophobic material [78]; although this enhances the gas exchange in membranous oxygenators, the membrane’s hydrophobic material serves as an adsorption platform for nonspecific proteins that undergo further conformations, making the protein layer more prone to thrombosis [79].

5. Coagulation and Inflammation on ECMO

5.1. ECMO and Fibrinogen Adsorption

Early interactions between blood proteins and biosurfaces started with experiments between plasma proteins and glass [80]. When plasma proteins come into contact with glass, immediate fibrinogen adsorption on the surface of the glass favors further precipitation of clotting factor XII, high-density lipoprotein, kininogen, albumin, IgG, and complement system components [80,81]. ECMO tubes are made of PVC mixed with an additive—DEHP. One of the first studies to describe the interactions between blood proteins and PVC states that after twenty minutes, 30% more fibrinogen precipitates on the surface of PVC–DEHP material in comparison with the well made solely from PVC [8]. Notably, the association between the percentage of DEHP and the amount of adsorbed fibrinogen within the PVC–DEHP surface is linear [8]. On the contrary, albumin adsorption was higher for the pure PVC material compared to the PVC–DEHP mixture. Animal experiments were also conducted; a study on an ECMO sheep model demonstrated a decline in fibrinogen level, which was successfully restored over a two-day period [82]. These experiments demonstrate that contact between blood and the ECMO lining may induce a decline in circulating fibrinogen. The next issue is to assess the association between ECMO-induced hypofibrinogenemia and bleeding. CPB tubes consist of the same PVC material mixed with DEHP [83]. In a study including 50 children, the mean fibrinogen concentration in the mediastinal bleeding group after CPB was lower compared to the non-bleeding control [84]. A recent retrospective study analyzed adults and pediatric data from 24 patients on ECMO [85]. Almost half of the patients demonstrated reduced fibrinogen activity of <100 mg/d in some period during ECMO placement [85]. Bleeding events and thrombogenesis occurred in patients who were connected to ECMO for a more extended period, especially for periods lasting longer than 250 h [85]. The studies show evidence of bleeding in patients with decreased fibrinogen levels and function on ECMO that may be related to the adsorption to the circuits. Furthermore, the trend of the higher rates of bleeding and thrombogenesis was also associated with a longer period of time spent on ECMO [85]. With the formation of the protein stratum, the further adhesion and activation of platelets and leukocytes along with the components of the complement system affected the existing protein layer, leading to the release of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-alpha, and furthering the inflammatory state [86]. A hydrophilic high-molecular-weight surface coating also prevents nonspecific protein binding due to its branched structure and hydrophilic nature [87]. The currently preferred heparin coating successfully decreased thrombin expression via direct antithrombin binding, reducing the inflammatory state in the circulatory system [88].

5.2. Coagulation Factors

The plasma contact activation system, which is composed of factor XII, kininogen, and prekallikrein, plays a critical procoagulation role when blood constituents interact with foreign surfaces. The negative charge situated on the surface of the ECMO coating activates factor XII [79], which then transforms prekallikrein into kallikrein [89]. In turn, kallikrein amplifies the formation of activated FXII, reinforcing the intrinsic coagulation cascade. Subsequently, circulating high-molecular-weight kininogen is cleaved by kallikrein, and the bradykinin molecule is released. Bradykinin, in return, contributes to the permeability of vessels and their vasodilation, enhancing inflammation [89]. Simultaneously, factor XIIa activates factor XI, which commences the sequential activation of the intrinsic pathway.
Renné et al. conducted a series of experiments in mice that showed that the absence of factor XII does not lead to bleeding, but rather weakens the density and quantity of thrombi upon stimulation with collagen and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) [90]. Experiments conducted by Cai et al. used extracorporeal shunts and assessed the clot formation in rats subjected to dose-dependent siRNA against factor XII. The results showed that as the siRNA concentration increased, the weight of the clots in the extracorporeal shunt decreased. This signifies the role of factor XII in the initiation of clot formation upon exposure to extracorporeal surfaces [91]. Larsson et al. demonstrated that the application of antibodies against factor XIIa reduced thrombogenesis when rabbits were connected to ECMO [92]. In comparison to heparin, anti-XIIa antibodies provided a similar thromboprotective effect but with less bleeding than was observed after heparin addition [92]. Thus, anti-XIIa antibodies seem to be a potential solution for achieving a thromboprotective effect without bleeding.

5.3. Tissue Factor

Tissue factor (tF) is a key initiator of the extrinsic coagulation cascade. Under artificial circumstances, six hours of exposure to an ECMO flow resulted in a manifold increase in tF expression on the surface of monocytes [93]. Recent findings suggest that a change in flow influences tF expression in leukocytes [4]. In vitro ECMO involving heparinized blood demonstrated statistically significant increases in the amount of tF on the surface of the leukocytes under low (0.3 L/min) and high flow (0.7 L/min) [4]. Fischer et al. demonstrated that the incubation of heparinized human blood with foreign biomaterials induced surface tF expression on leukocytes in a time-dependent manner [94]. Furthermore, the extent of tF expression was also linked to the activation of the complement system and other granulocytes. Interestingly, in a study with VA-ECMO settings, the tF pathway inhibitor activity was two times higher on the first and second cycle after ECMO initiation, unlike in the control group [95]. The tF pathway inhibitor is a physiological anticoagulant that is released by the vascular endothelium, which exhibits anticoagulant activity towards Xa and, in combination with Xa, inhibits tF/VIIa activation [96]. Experiments show that ECMO initiation intensifies tF expression on leukocytes and launches an anticoagulant system to prevent tF-induced extrinsic pathway inhibition. On the contrary, the heparin coating of ECMO linings demonstrated reduced inflammation by decreasing the procoagulant activity of monocytes towards a decline in tF expression by seventy percent compared to the non-heparin coating of ECMO linings [97]. This supports the role of the heparin precoating of ECMO linings in reducing thrombogenesis and inflammation.

5.4. Von Willebrand Factor

On ECMO, another significant component of hemostasis that becomes dysregulated is the vWF. The vWF is assembled in endothelial cells and megakaryocytes [98], and it forms multimers composed of up to 60 molecules [99]. Upon further fusion of vesicles carrying multimeric vWF molecules, vWF molecules organize themselves into longer bundles that bind platelets and collagen [99]. Under increased shear stress that exerts a centrifugal roller pump, vWF multimers are mechanically disassembled and certain vWF domains are exposed to cleavage by ADAMTS-13 metalloprotease [100]. Smaller vWF multimers fail to bind and dock platelets through the exposed collagen to the site of injury, interfering with platelets’ contribution to clot formation and leading to bleeding. Ineffective vWF functioning, which results in bleeding, was defined as acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) [101]. An assessment of high-molecular-weight vWF multimers in 18 patients during ECMO demonstrated a decreased quantity of high-molecular-weight vWF subunits, as well as a reduced ability to bind collagen on the first day of ECMO [102]. Seventeen patients developed bleeding that was reversed after ECMO removal and after appropriate treatment with cryoprecipitate or thrombocytes [102]. A recent study of a COVID-19 patient connected to ECMO showed a similar decrease in the number of high-molecular-weight vWF multimers that were restored after ECMO removal and treatment with cryoprecipitate, while the heparin concentration remained unchanged [103]. In one study, to correct bleeding caused during AVWS without aggravating hypercoagulation after cryoprecipitate was administered, the patient’s bleeding ceased after the addition of recombinant vWF concentrate [104]. According to the findings of a recent systematic review, all ECMO runs are accompanied by AVWS that develops almost immediately after the ECMO launch and discontinues after explantation [105]. These data suggest that the cause of bleeding should be reconsidered, and the management of this symptom could be extended by considering cryoprecipitate or recombinant vWF concentrate, before changing the heparin therapy.

5.5. Complement System

Alternative pathway complement systems are launched when C3b and IgGs come into contact with adsorbed proteins on the surface of extracorporeal linings [79]. Considering that non-endothelialized foreign surfaces do not possess inhibitory stimuli for complement inactivation, this process is exacerbated, triggering innate immunity and overall inflammation [86]. ARDS patients on ECMO demonstrated the activation of the soluble membrane attack complexes with the enhanced production of Bb components one hour after ECMO implantation [106]. This suggests that the alternative pathway components play significant roles in the initiation of inflammatory responses in patients on ECMO. Another study that included six neonate patients showed maximal activation of the complement system within the first two hours after the start of ECMO and consistency in complement activation for three days [107].
CPB circuits are made of the same material as the circuits for ECMO [108]. Complement system activation was also observed among nineteen cardiac surgery patients who underwent CPB within hours after the treatment began due to their blood coming into contact with foreign surfaces [109]. Similarly, the activation of the complement system was observed in seventeen patients undergoing dialysis within the first 30 min, with a subsequent increase in acute inflammation markers by the end of the process [110]. Circuits for dialysis are made of PVC and DEHP additive [111]. It was observed that the degraded complement product iC3b binds to dialysis circuits and favors the adhesion of neutrophils by triggering complement receptor type 3, along with formed anaphylatoxins, thereby amplifying the overall inflammatory response [112]. As seen in these experiments, when plasma comes into contact with artificial surfaces, it activates the complement system via an alternative pathway, increasing the risk of an inflammatory response.

5.6. Neutrophils, Monocytes, and Cytokines on ECMO

Neutrophils are among the key components of the interplay of coagulation and the inflammation axis. Receptors of anaphylatoxins such as C3a and C5a are expressed on the surface of neutrophils [113,114]. The priming of anaphylatoxin C5a with its receptor on the surface of neutrophils was shown to induce neutrophil activation and the expression of tFs on their surfaces [114,115]. Early experiments investigating the influence of ECMO on leukocytes showed that neutrophils and monocytes are activated after incubation with the plasma received from patients on ECMO [116]. The overexpression of CD18 integrin, a molecule that participates in cellular adhesion, on monocytes and neutrophils was already observed two–four hours after the beginning of ECMO activation, and the peak of neutrophil-derived elastase was reached within eight hours [116]. Flow cytometry analysis of the plasma received from nine patients on VA-ECMO revealed an augmented number of immature neutrophils with attenuated production of C5a receptors [117]. Interestingly, there was a rise in the number of myeloid-derived suppressor cells [117]. Examining ELISA data, it was found that there was a concurrent increase in the level of pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and IL-10 [117]. These experiments suggest that, along with the activation of inflammatory response towards artificial surfaces, the increased activity of the innate immune response could also be a concern, and this might lead to immunity exhaustion. The platelet-rich plasma of COVID-19 patients induced a higher mRNA load of tF inside the neutrophils and enhanced the formation of NETs and release of tF inside the NETs’ chromatin structures, further propagating thrombogenesis [118]. Although the study conducted on a sheep animal model revealed formation of NETosis six hours after launching ECMO, the formation of NETs was not observed in patients sixteen hours and two days after ECMO initiation [119,120,121]. Overall, the data suggest that either the inflammatory stimuli was not sufficient to induce NETosis in the human model, or there is an efficient counteracting immunosuppressive process that works in tandem with the anti-inflammatory properties of heparin and antithrombin.

5.7. Platelets

Platelets are an essential part of thrombogenesis. They contain surface glycoproteins, in which the GPIb-IX receptor is of primary importance, facilitating platelets’ attachment to an injury site and subsequent thrombus formation. This GPIb-IX receptor comprises GPIbα, GPIbβ, and GPIX components, with GPIbα being the most superficial and binding to numerous ligands, including VWF, HMWK, FXI, FXII, P-selectin, integrins, and thrombin [122]. When the endothelium is damaged, collagen and vWF are exposed on the surface [123]. Liberated vWF binds to collagen and GPIbα, applying a pulling force that induces conformational changes in glycoproteins, and the subsequent mechanical signal transduction activates platelets [122]. The more pulling force applied by vWF, the more platelet activation occurs via the expression of switch-on markers such as P-selectin and phosphatidylserine on their surface [124]. According to a recent systematic review, almost all ECMO patients experience acquired von Willebrand syndrome. Furthermore, in a study including 107 patients on ECMO, it was shown that the more flow power that is applied, the higher the extent of shedding of GPIbα glycoproteins from platelets by the increased amount of circulating plasma GPIbα [125]. Also, there was a decline in the concentration of thrombocytes after one hour of ECMO initiation. The study also supported the hypothesis that elevated shedding of the receptors and faster removal of platelets from circulation occurred in patients on ECMO, suggesting accelerated clearance of platelets without the GPIbα surface glycoprotein. A greater extent of shedding also indicates a decline in binding to vWF and docking the platelets to injured sites, favoring less effective platelet adhesion and aggregation and, as a result, extended bleeding. Under the constant centrifugal force generated by ECMO pumps, high-molecular-weight vWF multimers disassemble, losing their ability to bind collagen and recruit platelets to the site of bleeding. This phenomenon, as mentioned, is referred to as acquired von Willebrand syndrome [102,105]. The fragmentation of the vWF multimers under shear stress also exposes vWF units to greater degradation by ADAMTS13 metalloprotease, decreasing the effectiveness of platelet recruitment and activation towards the site of clot formation [126]. Some studies demonstrate that under flow conditions, more phosphatidylserine molecules (PSs), the marker of activated platelets, were expressed on the surface of platelets in comparison to the non-dynamic thrombocytes [4]. A study including the blood of ten patients subjected to ECMO supported the dependence of the number of activated platelets on the duration of the flow [49]. Platelets subjected to flow were also more prone to adhere to fibrinogen layers rather than to vWF multimers [49].

5.8. Summary of Coagulation and Inflammation

  • We examined the changes in hemostasis and innate immunity and found that the following changes contribute to coagulopathy and inflammation after ECMO initiation.
  • Upon contact with the negative charge of extracorporeal circuits, the activation system triggers an intrinsic coagulation cascade, contributing to thrombogenesis.
  • Contact of blood with ECMO linings and the oxygenator induces fibrinogen adsorption and further protein layer formation.
  • Activation of the complement system propagates inflammation.
  • Activation of leukocytes results in increased expression of tF on the surface of neutrophils and monocytes, release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and overall inflammation.
  • Platelets become activated, and thus are prone to adhere to the fibrinogen protein layer. Shedding of the glycoprotein receptor on the surface of platelets due to mechanical stress leads to ineffective binding to vWF multimers and enhanced clearance. In addition, the contribution to thrombogenesis leads to thrombocytopenia.
  • Shear stress and fragmentation of vWF multimers by ADAMTS-13 metalloprotease and the inadequate recruitment of platelets to the site of injury lead to the development of acquired von Willebrand disease, which predisposes patients to bleeding.

6. Management of Heparin Resistance

There is no generalized protocol for assessing the efficacy of UFH in patients on ECMO [17]. Thus, there is no universally defined definition for HR. Currently, the assessment of hemostasis on ECMO does not involve measuring the procoagulant activity of the contact activation system, the effect of the adsorbed protein layer, the activation of complement and immune systems, or the effect of the flow after ECMO initiation. Nevertheless, we suggest that UFH efficiency in patients on ECMO is patient-dependent. In particular, the anticoagulation approach should be diversified in patients younger than 3–6 months due to AT immaturity, which is not a concern in older patients. The replenishment of AT is still subject to debate; however, recent studies have shown that AT replenishment allows the necessary therapeutic anti-Xa to be achieved and facilitates a decrease in the UFH requirement [30,127]. A study that compared 20 patients in whom HR was managed by fresh frozen plasma delivery and by an increase in the UFH dose showed that the mean daily requirement of UFH was significantly lower in the group receiving fresh frozen plasma, constituting 10,669.1 IU/d and 19,405.6 IU/d, respectively [30]. Another study evaluated the replenishment of AT when the AT activity was <50% in 14 patients with subtherapeutic anti-Xa concentrations at UFH doses of 15–20 IU/kg/h [127]. Thirteen out of fourteen patients achieved therapeutic anti-Xa levels, although the bleeding rate and platelet transfusion were higher after AT supplementation [127]. Investigations among 191 pediatric patients with a mean age of 65 days revealed that, in 43% of AT measurement cases, the AT level was lower than the defined threshold for neonates by being < 50%, whereas for elder children, by being <80% lower [14]. After AT replenishment (200 doses), 36% of patients (63) remained AT deficient [14]. In patients with suspected HR, 16.6% achieved a decrease in their UFH dose after AT supplementation, while 83.3% required the same UFH dose or higher [14]. This study shows that the pediatric cohort, especially at the median age of 2 months, may need more thorough consideration with regard to AT replacement. One more conclusion that may be drawn from this study is that AT infusion does not necessarily decrease the UFH requirement and thus, does not reflect actual heparin responsiveness. Another very recent investigation evaluated the effect of AT consumption in fifty patients during 7 days on VA-ECMO [128]. Participants developed an acquired AT deficiency (50% < AT < 70%), which, in most cases, resolved within 3 days. Although there was evidence of AT deficiency, the median AT level raised from 48% to 63% by the end of the 7-day study period. Therapeutic anti-Xa levels (0.3–0.5 IU/mL) were reached by escalating the UFH dose, and the study observed no correlation between moderate AT deficiency and heparin responsiveness [128]. Nevertheless, the importance of AT supplementation in the perioperative period is well illustrated in a case series of three patients in whom ECMO placement with only heparinized circuits and no actual anticoagulation therapy was a successful bridge to lung transplantation, with a mean AT activity before and after transplantation of 73.3% (91%, 56%, 73%) and 74.3% (82%, 79%, 62%), respectively [71]. All the abovementioned examples emphasize the importance of a patient-dependent strategy when it comes to AT supplementation in patients on ECMO.
Considering the treatment of HR, Levy et al. created a highly comprehensive protocol for managing HR in ICU that emphasizes the need to switch to anti-Xa activity if there is no change in the APTT on UFH dose elevation [18]. If anti-Xa shows subtherapeutic concentrations even after the UFH dose has increased, and there is evidence of thrombogenesis, the patient’s AT level should be checked and replenished if necessary, or they should immediately be switched to a DTI such as bivalirudin or argatroban [18]. Regarding the UFH dose titration, although the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guidelines describe a therapeutic UFH range of 20–50 units/kg/h, the maximal UFH dose that defined HR in the literature was >40 units/kg/h [29,39]. As documented in most of the studies mentioned in Table 1, the maximal UFH dose that still resulted in subtherapeutic anti-Xa was defined as an HR dose. To further eliminate the ambiguities associated with defining HR in patients on ECMO, we suggest performing calculations of the UFH dose in terms of the patient’s weight rather than in terms of a daily dose. It would also be beneficial to document the concurrent AT activity at the highest UFH dose with anti-Xa < 0.3 IU/mL to draw any potential associations between clinically useful AT–heparin coupling. Notably, 25% of endogenous anticoagulation is performed by HCII [65]. This may explain how therapeutic anti-Xa can be achieved even when the AT level is low. At high UFH concentrations, HCII can bind the clot-bound form of thrombin [62]. On the contrary, AT can bind only free thrombin molecules [62]. The monitoring of HCII during long-lasting UFH exposure would also be beneficial in quantifying the effect of HR in a unified formula. The effects of artificial surfaces inflicted by ECMO that initiate thrombogenesis, inflammation, and platelet activation, which exacerbate HR, are of equal significance. To decipher the true effect of HR, the reflection of immune activation can be assessed by concurrent CRP level, white blood cells WBC count, platelet count, and acute phase protein levels. Thrombogenesis, in turn, can be assessed using a coagulogram, the level of D-dimers, and ROTEM, which measures the clot strength, the functionality of fibrinogen, and the extent of platelet aggregation. Documenting the flow is also important, since several studies report that the higher flow parameters contribute to higher rates of thrombogenesis [21]. Raghunathan et al. reports that HR patients had a higher mean flow in comparison to the cohort of the patients without HR [24]. Furthermore, in the study in which ECMO was applied as a bridge to lung transplantation, physicians did not escalate the parameters of VA-ECMO to prevent HR development [71]. In addition, flow rates influence platelet activation and vWF disintegration, which directly influence platelet activity and clearance [4,49,102,105]. Thus, if the documentation of an HR dose of UFH is delivered in a similar way going forward, taking into consideration the parameters of inflammation, thrombogenesis, and flow, there is a high probability of identifying a unique dose range for defining HR.

7. Summary

HR was shown to be patient- and context-dependent. We illustrated that the dose which defines HR is the maximal UFH dose in the treatment reflecting anti-Xa < 0.3 IU/mL. We also discussed the influence of artificial surfaces on thrombogenesis, immune activation, and platelet consumption, all of which exacerbate HR. We posit that true HR in patients on ECMO can be deciphered if the flow parameters, CRP level, WBC count, platelet count, acute phase protein level, coagulogram, level of D-dimers, ROTEM with functional fibrinogen, and platelet aggregation are documented in a single original study with stratification on pediatric and adult cohorts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, review and editing Tatyana Li and Azhar Zhailauova; project administration Aydyn Kuanyshbek; writing—review and editing—Iwan Wachruschew, Shaimurat Tulegenov, Vitaliy Sazonov; supervision—Timur Kapyshev. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (АР19677596).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gu, K.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, B.; Chang, Y.; Zeng, Y. Hemodynamic Differences Between Central ECMO and Peripheral ECMO: A Primary CFD Study. Med. Sci. Monit. 2016, 22, 717–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, M.; Pauls, J.P.; Bartnikowski, N.; Haymet, A.B.; Chan, C.H.H.; Suen, J.Y.; Schneider, B.; Ki, K.K.; Whittaker, A.K.; Dargusch, M.S.; et al. Anti-thrombogenic Surface Coatings for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Narrative Review. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021, 7, 4402–4419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vuylsteke, A.; Brodie, D.; Combes, A.; Fowles, J.A.; Peek, G. The ECMO circuit. In ECMO in the Adult Patient; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2017; pp. 25–57. [Google Scholar]
  4. Meyer, A.D.; Rishmawi, A.R.; Kamucheka, R.; Lafleur, C.; Batchinsky, A.I.; Mackman, N.; Cap, A.P. Effect of blood flow on platelets, leukocytes, and extracellular vesicles in thrombosis of simulated neonatal extracorporeal circulation. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Steiger, T.; Foltan, M.; Philipp, A.; Mueller, T.; Gruber, M.; Bredthauer, A.; Krenkel, L.; Birkenmaier, C.; Lehle, K. Accumulations of von Willebrand factor within ECMO oxygenators: Potential indicator of coagulation abnormalities in critically ill patients? Artif. Organs 2019, 43, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wilm, J.; Philipp, A.; Müller, T.; Bredthauer, A.; Gleich, O.; Schmid, C.; Lehle, K. Leukocyte Adhesion as an Indicator of Oxygenator Thrombosis During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy? ASAIO J. 2018, 64, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lehle, K.; Philipp, A.; Gleich, O.; Holzamer, A.; Müller, T.; Bein, T.; Schmid, C. Efficiency in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation—Cellular Deposits on Polymethypentene Membranes Increase Resistance to Blood Flow and Reduce Gas Exchange Capacity. ASAIO J. 2008, 54, 612–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhao, X.; Courtney, J.M. Influence on Blood of Plasticized Polyvinyl Chloride: Significance of the Plasticizer. Artif. Organs 1999, 23, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chauhan, S.; Subin, S. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, an anesthesiologist’s perspective: Physiology and principles. Part 1. Ann. Card. Anaesth. 2011, 14, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Finley, A.; Greenberg, C. Heparin Sensitivity and Resistance. Anesth. Analg. 2013, 116, 1210–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Levy, J.H.; Connors, J.M. Heparin Resistance—Clinical Perspectives and Management Strategies. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 826–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Levy, J.H.; Sniecinski, R.M.; Rocca, B.; Ghadimi, K.; Douketis, J.; Frere, C.; Helms, J.; Iba, T.; Koster, A.; Lech, T.K.; et al. Defining heparin resistance: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee of Perioperative and Critical Care Thrombosis and Hemostasis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2023, 21, 3649–3657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nagle, E.L.; Dager, W.E.; Duby, J.J.; Roberts, A.J.; Kenny, L.E.; Murthy, M.S.; Pretzlaff, R.K. Bivalirudin in Pediatric Patients Maintained on Extracorporeal Life Support. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 14, e182–e188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Procaccini, D.E.; Roem, J.; Ng, D.K.; Rappold, T.E.; Jung, D.; Gobburu, J.V.S.; Bembea, M.M. Evaluation of acquired antithrombin deficiency in paediatric patients supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2023, 89, 2396–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Levy, J.H.; Sniecinski, R.M.; Maier, C.L.; Despotis, G.J.; Ghadimi, K.; Helms, J.; Ranucci, M.; Steiner, M.E.; Tanaka, K.A.; Connors, J.M. Finding a common definition of heparin resistance in adult cardiac surgery: Communication from the ISTH SSC subcommittee on perioperative and critical care thrombosis and hemostasis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2024, 22, 1249–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rajsic, S.; Breitkopf, R.; Jadzic, D.; Popovic Krneta, M.; Tauber, H.; Treml, B. Anticoagulation Strategies during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. McMichael, A.B.V.; Ryerson, L.M.; Ratano, D.; Fan, E.; Faraoni, D.; Annich, G.M. 2021 ELSO Adult and Pediatric Anticoagulation Guidelines. ASAIO J. 2022, 68, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Levy, J.H.; Frere, C.; Koster, A. Resistance to unfractionated heparin in the ICU: Evaluation and management options. Intensive Care Med. 2023, 49, 1005–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Downie, I.; Liederman, Z.; Thiyagarajah, K.; Selby, R.; Lin, Y. Pseudo heparin resistance caused by elevated factor VIII in a critically ill patient. Can. J. Anesth. J. Can. D’anesthésie 2019, 66, 995–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Calamaro, J.; Viamonte, H.; Keesari, R.; Davis, J.; Woods, G.; Fundora, M.P. Anticoagulation management for patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Prog. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2024, 72, 101684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nagler, B.; Staudinger, T.; Schellongowski, P.; Knoebl, P.; Brock, R.; Kornfehl, A.; Schwameis, M.; Herkner, H.; Levy, J.H.; Buchtele, N. Incidence of heparin resistance and heparin failure in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An exploratory retrospective analysis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2024, 10, 2773–2783. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaushik, S.; Derespina, K.R.; Chandhoke, S.; Shah, D.D.; Cohen, T.; Shlomovich, M.; Medar, S.S.; Peek, G.J. Use of bivalirudin for anticoagulation in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Perfusion 2023, 38, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xie, Y.; Luo, J.; Li, J.; Ge, T.; Yan, Y.; Cao, W.; Li, X. Critical coronavirus disease 2019 complicated with heparin resistance in 2 patients. Chin. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 34, 509–513. [Google Scholar]
  24. Raghunathan, V.; Liu, P.; Kohs, T.C.L.; Amirsoltani, R.; Oakes, M.; McCarty, O.J.T.; Olson, S.R.; Zonies, D.; Shatzel, J.J. Heparin Resistance Is Common in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation but Is Not Associated with Worse Clinical Outcomes. ASAIO J. 2021, 67, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schneider, J.; Tilford, B.; Safa, R.; Dentel, J.; Veenstra, M.; Ang, J.; Cashen, K. 60: Extracorporeal Membrane Support for Pediatric Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children. Crit. Care Med. 2021, 49, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Streng, A.S.; Delnoij, T.S.R.; Mulder, M.M.G.; Sels, J.W.E.M.; Wetzels, R.J.H.; Verhezen, P.W.M.; Olie, R.H.; Kooman, J.P.; van Kuijk, S.M.J.; Brandts, L.; et al. Monitoring of Unfractionated Heparin in Severe COVID-19: An Observational Study of Patients on CRRT and ECMO. TH Open 2020, 04, e365–e375. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hamzah, M.; Jarden, A.M.; Ezetendu, C.; Stewart, R. Evaluation of Bivalirudin As an Alternative to Heparin for Systemic Anticoagulation in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 21, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sorial, M.N.; Greene, R.A.; Zullo, A.R.; Berard-Collins, C.; Willis, S. Exogenous supplementation of antithrombin III in adult and pediatric patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Int. J. Artif. Organs 2020, 43, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gurnani, P.; Bak, E.; Michalak, L.; Dobrilovic, N.; March, R. 137: Use of bivalirudin in a patient with heparin resistance during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 47, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khazi, F.M.; Elhoufi, A.M.; AbdelAziz, T.A.; Siddiqui, N.R.; Al-Zamkan, B.; Robert, S.B.; Pillai, P.K.; Aljassim, O. Fresh frozen plasma: A solution to heparin resistance during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Egypt. J. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 6, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Niimi, K.S.; Fanning, J.J. Initial Experience with Recombinant Antithrombin to Treat Antithrombin Deficiency in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. J. Extra Corpor. Technol. 2014, 46, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Woods, G.M.; Kim, D.W.; Paden, M.L.; Viamonte, H.K. Thrombolysis in Children: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 9, 814033. [Google Scholar]
  33. Andrew, M.; Paes, B.; Milner, R.; Johnston, M.; Mitchell, L.; Tollefsen, D.; Powers, P. Development of the human coagulation system in the full-term infant. Blood 1987, 70, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ofosu, F.A.; Modi, G.; Cerskus, A.L.; Hirsh, J.; Blajchman, M.A. Heparin with low affinity to antithrombin III inhibits the activation of prothrombin in normal plasma. Thromb. Res. 1982, 28, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vatsyayan, R.; Kothari, H.; Mackman, N.; Pendurthi, U.R.; Rao, L.V.M. Inactivation of Factor VIIa by Antithrombin In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo: Role of Tissue Factor and Endothelial Cell Protein C Receptor. PLoS ONE. 2014, 9, e103505. [Google Scholar]
  36. Joist, J.H.; Cowan, J.F.; Khan, M. Rapid Loss of Factor XII- and XI-Activity in Ellagic Acid Activated Normal Plasma: Role of Plasma Inhibitors and Implications for Automated Aptt-Recording. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1977, 90, 1054–1065. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lam, L.H.; Silbert, J.E.; Rosenberg, R.D. The separation of active and inactive forms of heparin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1976, 69, 570–577. [Google Scholar]
  38. Andersson, L.O.; Barrowcliffe, T.W.; Holmer, E.; Johnson, E.A.; Sims, G.E.C. Anticoagulant properties of heparin fractionated by affinity chromatography on matrix-bound antithrombin III and by gel filtration. Thromb. Res. 1976, 9, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marciniak, E.; Gockerman, J.P. Heparin-induced decrease in circulating antithrombin-III. Lancet 1977, 310, 581–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schlömmer, C.; Brandtner, A.; Bachler, M. Antithrombin and Its Role in Host Defense and Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Horie, S.; Ishii, H.; Kazama, M. Heparin-like glycosaminoglycan is a receptor for Antithrombin III-dependent but not for thrombin-dependent prostacyclin production in human endothelial cells. Thromb. Res. 1990, 59, 895–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hoffmann, J.N.; Vollmar, B.; Inthorn, D.; Schildberg, F.W.; Menger, M.D. Antithrombin reduces leukocyte adhesion during chronic endotoxemia by modulation of the cyclooxygenase pathway. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2000, 279, C98–C107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Morgan, M.R.; Humphries, M.J.; Bass, M.D. Synergistic control of cell adhesion by integrins and syndecans. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 8, 957–969. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Gopal, S. Syndecans in Inflammation at a Glance. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kaneider, N.C.; Egger, P.; Dunzendorfer, S.; Wiedermann, C.J. Syndecan-4 as Antithrombin Receptor of Human Neutrophils. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 287, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cosmi, B.; Fredenburgh, J.C.; Rischke, J.; Hirsh, J.; Young, E.; Weitz, J.I. Effect of Nonspecific Binding to Plasma Proteins on the Antithrombin Activities of Unfractionated Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin, and Dermatan Sulfate. Circulation 1997, 95, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Young, E.; Prins, M.; Levine, M.N.; Hirsh, J. Heparin Binding to Plasma Proteins, an Important Mechanism for Heparin Resistance. Thromb. Haemost. 1992, 67, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Koster, A.; Zittermann, A.; Schirmer, U. Heparin Resistance and Excessive Thrombocytosis. Anesth. Analg. 2013, 117, 1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sun, W.; Wang, S.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, T.; Arias, K.; Griffith, B.P.; Wu, Z.J. Impact of high mechanical shear stress and oxygenator membrane surface on blood damage relevant to thrombosis and bleeding in a pediatric ECMO circuit. Artif. Organs 2020, 44, 717–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Vuylsteke, A.; Mills, R.J.; Crosbie, A.E.; Burns, T.I.; Latimer, R.D. Increased pre-operative platelet counts are a possible predictor for reduced sensitivity to heparin. Br. J. Anaesth. 2000, 85, 896–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lim, G.B. Discovery and purification of heparin. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lever, R.; Smailbegovic, A.; Riffo-Vasquez, Y.; Gray, E.; Hogwood, J.; Francis, S.M.; Richardson, N.V.; Page, C.P.; Mulloy, B. Biochemical and functional characterization of glycosaminoglycans released from degranulating rat peritoneal mast cells: Insights into the physiological role of endogenous heparin. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 41, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tang, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; He, Z.; Yang, X.; Cheng, X.; Peng, Y.; Xue, Q.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, R.; et al. Heparin prevents caspase-11-dependent septic lethality independent of anticoagulant properties. Immunity 2021, 54, 454–467.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, R.; Zhang, X. A potential new pathway for heparin treatment of sepsis-induced lung injury: Inhibition of pulmonary endothelial cell pyroptosis by blocking hMGB1-LPS-induced caspase-11 activation. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 984835. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hoppensteadt, D.; Fareed, J.; Klein, A.L.; Jasper, S.E.; Apperson-Hansen, C.; Lieber, E.A.; Katz, W.E.; Malouf, J.F.; Stoddard, M.F.; Pape, L.A.; et al. Comparison of Anticoagulant and Anti-Inflammatory Responses Using Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin for Transesophageal Echocardiography-Guided Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation††A list of participating clinical sites appears in the Appendix. Am. J. Cardiol. 2008, 102, 842–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nykänen, A.I.; Selby, R.; McRae, K.M.; Zhao, Y.; Asghar, U.M.; Donahoe, L.; Granton, J.; de Perrot, M. Pseudo Heparin Resistance After Pulmonary Endarterectomy: Role of Thrombus Production of Factor VIII. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2022, 34, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Levy, J.H.; Staudinger, T.; Steiner, M.E. How to manage anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med. 2022, 48, 1076–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Olczyk, P.; Mencner, Ł.; Komosinska-Vassev, K. Diverse Roles of Heparan Sulfate and Heparin in Wound Repair. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 549417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Heit, J.A. Thrombophilia. In Consultative Hemostasis and Thrombosis; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 205–239. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tollefsen, D.M.; Pestka, C.A.; Monafo, W.J. Activation of heparin cofactor II by dermatan sulfate. J. Biol. Chem. 1983, 258, 6713–6716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Tollefsen, D.M. Heparin Cofactor II. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1997, 425, 35–44. [Google Scholar]
  62. Weitz, J.I.; Hudoba, M.; Massel, D.; Maraganore, J.; Hirsh, J. Clot-bound thrombin is protected from inhibition by heparin-antithrombin III but is susceptible to inactivation by antithrombin III-independent inhibitors. J. Clin. Investig. 1990, 86, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tollefsen, D.; Pestka, C. Heparin cofactor II activity in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation and hepatic failure. Blood 1985, 66, 769–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Conard, J.; Brosstad, F.; Lie Larsen, M.; Samama, M.; Abildgaard, U. Molar Antithrombin Concentration in Normal Human Plasma. Pathophysiol. Haemost. Thromb. 1983, 13, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Koide, T. Antithrombin and Heparin Cofactor II: Structure and Functions. In Recent Advances in Thrombosis and Hemostasis; Springer: Japan, Tokyo, 2008; pp. 177–189. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kaestner, F.; Seiler, F.; Rapp, D.; Eckert, E.; Müller, J.; Metz, C.; Bals, R.; Drexler, H.; Lepper, P.M.; Göen, T. Exposure of patients to di(2-ethylhexy)phthalate (DEHP) and its metabolite MEHP during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. PLoS ONE. 2020, 15, e0224931. [Google Scholar]
  67. Fernandez-Canal, C.; Pinta, P.G.; Eljezi, T.; Larbre, V.; Kauffmann, S.; Camilleri, L.; Cosserant, B.; Bernard, L.; Pereira, B.; Constantin, J.-M.; et al. Patients’ exposure to PVC plasticizers from ECMO circuits. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2018, 15, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Testai, E.; Hartemann, P.; Rastogi, S.C.; Bernauer, U.; Piersma, A.; De Jong, W.; Gulliksson, H.; Sharpe, R.; Schubert, D.; Epstein, M.; et al. The safety of medical devices containing DEHP plasticized PVC or other plasticizers on neonates and other groups possibly at risk (2015 update). Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 76, 209–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yang, L.; Liu, X.; Peng, Z.; Liu, Z.; Song, P.; Zhou, J.; Ma, K.; Yu, Y.; Dong, Q. Exposure to di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) increases the risk of cancer. BMC Public Health 2024, 24, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Steinlechner, B.; Kargl, G.; Schlömmer, C.; Holaubek, C.; Scheriau, G.; Eichinger, S.; Gratz, J.; Rössler, B. Can Heparin-Coated ECMO Cannulas Induce Thrombocytopenia in COVID-19 Patients? Case Rep. Immunol 2021, 2021, 6624682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Scaravilli, V.; Fumagalli, J.; Rosso, L.; Polli, F.; Panigada, M.; Abbruzzese, C.; Crotti, S.; Lissoni, A.; Nosotti, M.; Pesenti, A.; et al. Heparin-Free Lung Transplantation on Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Bridge. ASAIO J. 2021, 67, e191–e197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rodrigues, A.B.; Rodrigues, A.; Correia, C.J.; Jesus, G.N.; Ribeiro, J.M. Anticoagulation Management in V-V ECMO Patients: A Multidisciplinary Pragmatic Protocol. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Maul, T.M.; Massicotte, M.P.; Wearden, P.D. ECMO Biocompatibility: Surface Coatings, Anticoagulation, and Coagulation Monitoring. In Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Advances in Therapy; InTech: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  74. Fukuda, M. Evolutions of extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO): Perspectives for advanced hollow fiber membrane. J. Artif. Organs 2024, 27, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Shimono, T.; Shomura, Y.; Hioki, I.; Shimamoto, A.; Tenpaku, H.; Maze, Y.; Onoda, K.; Takao, M.; Shimpo, H.; Yada, I. Silicone-Coated Polypropylene Hollow-Fiber Oxygenator: Experimental Evaluation and Preliminary Clinical Use. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1997, 63, 1730–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Callaghan, S.; Cai, T.; McCafferty, C.; Van Den Helm, S.; Horton, S.; MacLaren, G.; Monagle, P.; Ignjatovic, V. Adsorption of Blood Components to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Surfaces in Humans: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Niimi, Y.; Yamane, S.; Yamaji, K.; Tayama, E.; Sueoka, A.; Nosea, Y. Protein Adsorption and Platelet Adhesion on the Surface of an Oxygenator Membrane. ASAIO J. 1997, 43, M710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Slepička, P.; Trostová, S.; Slepičková Kasálková, N.; Kolská, Z.; Malinský, P.; Macková, A.; Bačáková, L.; Švorčík, V. Nanostructuring of polymethylpentene by plasma and heat treatment for improved biocompatibility. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Doyle, A.J.; Hunt, B.J. Current Understanding of How Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenators Activate Haemostasis and Other Blood Components. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Vroman, L.; Adams, A.; Fischer, G.; Munoz, P. Interaction of high molecular weight kininogen, factor XII, and fibrinogen in plasma at interfaces. Blood 1980, 55, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Turbill, P.; Beugeling, T.; Poot, A.A. Proteins involved in the Vroman effect during exposure of human blood plasma to glass and polyethylene. Biomaterials 1996, 17, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Passmore, M.R.; Fung, Y.L.; Simonova, G.; Foley, S.R.; Diab, S.D.; Dunster, K.R.; Spanevello, M.M.; McDonald, C.I.; Tung, J.-P.; Pecheniuk, N.M.; et al. Evidence of altered haemostasis in an ovine model of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Crit. Care 2017, 21, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Bednarski Spiwak, A.J.; Horbal, A.; Leatherbury, R.; Hansford, D.J. Extracorporeal Tubing in the Roller Pump Raceway: Physical Changes and Particulate Generation. J. Extra Corpor. Technol. 2008, 40, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Moganasundram, S.; Hunt, B.J.; Sykes, K.; Holton, F.; Parmar, K.; Durward, A.; Murdoch, I.A.; Austin, C.; Anderson, D.; Tibby, S.M. The Relationship Among Thromboelastography, Hemostatic Variables, and Bleeding After Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery in Children. Anesth. Analg. 2010, 110, 995–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Boggio, L.N.; Simpson, M.L. Fibrinogen Replacement Underutilization in ECMO. Blood 2020, 136 (Suppl. 1), 4–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Millar, J.E.; Fanning, J.P.; McDonald, C.I.; McAuley, D.F.; Fraser, J.F. The inflammatory response to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): A review of the pathophysiology. Crit. Care 2016, 20, 387. [Google Scholar]
  87. De los Santos Pereira, A.; Sheikh, S.; Blaszykowski, C.; Pop-Georgievski, O.; Fedorov, K.; Thompson, M.; Rodriguez-Emmenegger, C. Antifouling Polymer Brushes Displaying Antithrombogenic Surface Properties. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 1179–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Keuren, J.F.W.; Wielders, S.J.H.; Willems, G.M.; Morra, M.; Cahalan, L.; Cahalan, P.; Lindhout, T. Thrombogenicity of polysaccharide-coated surfaces. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 1917–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Naudin, C.; Burillo, E.; Blankenberg, S.; Butler, L.; Renné, T. Factor XII Contact Activation. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2017, 43, 814–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Renné, T.; Pozgajová, M.; Grüner, S.; Schuh, K.; Pauer, H.U.; Burfeind, P.; Gailani, D.; Nieswandt, B. Defective thrombus formation in mice lacking coagulation factor XII. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Cai, T.Q.; Wu, W.; Shin, M.K.; Xu, Y.; Jochnowitz, N.; Zhou, Y.; Hoos, L.; Bentley, R.; Strapps, W.; Thankappan, A.; et al. Factor XII full and partial null in rat confers robust antithrombotic efficacy with no bleeding. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 2015, 26, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Larsson, M.; Rayzman, V.; Nolte, M.W.; Nickel, K.F.; Björkqvist, J.; Jämsä, A.; Hardy, M.P.; Fries, M.; Schmidbauer, S.; Hedenqvist, P.; et al. A Factor XIIa Inhibitory Antibody Provides Thromboprotection in Extracorporeal Circulation Without Increasing Bleeding Risk. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 222ra17. [Google Scholar]
  93. Kappelmayer, J.; Bernabei, A.; Edmunds, L.H.; Edgington, T.S.; Colman, R.W. Tissue factor is expressed on monocytes during simulated extracorporeal circulation. Circ. Res. 1993, 72, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fischer, M.; Sperling, C.; Tengvall, P.; Werner, C. The ability of surface characteristics of materials to trigger leukocyte tissue factor expression. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 2498–2507. [Google Scholar]
  95. Mazzeffi, M.; Judd, M.; Rabin, J.; Tabatabai, A.; Menaker, J.; Menne, A.; Chow, J.; Shah, A.; Henderson, R.; Herr, D.; et al. Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor Levels During Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adults. ASAIO J. 2021, 67, 878–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Broze, G.J., Jr. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor: Structure-function. Front. Biosci. 2012, 17, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Barstad, R.M.; ØVrum, E.; Ringdal, M.A.L.; ØYstese, R.; Hamers, M.J.; Veiby, O.P.; Rolfsen, T.; Stephens, R.W.; Sakariassen, K.S. Induction of monocyte tissue factor procoagulant activity during coronary artery bypass surgery is reduced with heparin-coated extracorporeal circuit. Br. J. Haematol. 1996, 94, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lenting, P.J.; Christophe, O.D.; Denis, C.V. von Willebrand factor biosynthesis, secretion, and clearance: Connecting the far ends. Blood 2015, 125, 2019–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wagner, D.D. Cell Biology of von Willebrand Factor. Annu. Rev. Cell. Biol. 1990, 6, 217–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Schlagenhauf, A.; Kalbhenn, J.; Geisen, U.; Beyersdorf, F.; Zieger, B. Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome and Platelet Function Defects during Extracorporeal Life Support (Mechanical Circulatory Support). Hamostaseologie 2020, 40, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, H.; Li, D.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Meng, X.; Fan, H.; Hou, S. Shear-induced acquired von Willebrand syndrome: An accomplice of bleeding events in adults on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 10, 1159894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kalbhenn, J.; Schmidt, R.; Nakamura, L.; Schelling, J.; Rosenfelder, S.; Zieger, B. Early Diagnosis of Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome (AVWS) is Elementary for Clinical Practice in Patients Treated with ECMO Therapy. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2015, 22, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hayakawa, M.; Takano, K.; Kayashima, M.; Kasahara, K.; Fukushima, H.; Matsumoto, M. Management of a COVID-19 Patient during ECMO: Paying Attention to Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2021, 28, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Heubner, L.; Trautmann-Grill, K.; Tiebel, O.; Mirus, M.; Güldner, A.; Rand, A.; Spieth, P.M. Treatment of Acquired von Willebrand Disease due to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Pediatric COVID-19 Patient with Vonicog Alfa: A Case Report and Literature Review. TH Open 2023, 7, e76–e81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Frere, C.; Mazzeffi, M.; Maier, C.L.; Helms, J.; Steiner, M.E.; Sullenger, B.A.; Tanaka, K.A.; Connors, J.M.; Levy, J.H.; et al. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: A comprehensive review of current evidence: Communication from the ISTH SSC on perioperative and critical care thrombosis and hemostasis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2024, 22, 2608–2628. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  106. Vallhonrat, H.; Swinford, R.D.; Ingelfinger, J.R.; Williams, W.W.; Ryan, D.P.; Tolkoff-Robin, N.; Cosimi, A.B.; Pascual, M. Rapid Activation of the Alternative Pathway of Complement by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. ASAIO J. 1999, 45, 113–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Graulich, J.; Sonntag, J.; Marcinkowski, M.; Bauer, K.; Kössel, H.; Bührer, C.; Obladen, M.; Versmold, H.T. Complement activation by in vivo neonatal and in vitro extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Mediators Inflamm. 2002, 11, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sarkar, M.; Prabhu, V. Basics of cardiopulmonary bypass. Indian J. Anaesth. 2017, 61, 760. [Google Scholar]
  109. Bruins, P.; Velthuis, H.T.; Yazdanbakhsh, A.P.; Jansen, P.G.M.; van Hardevelt, F.W.J.; de Beaumont, E.M.F.H.; Wildevuur, C.R.; Eijsman, L.; Trouwborst, A.; Hack, C.E. Activation of the Complement System During and After Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery. Circulation 1997, 96, 3542–3548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Poppelaars, F.; Gaya da Costa, M.; Faria, B.; Berger, S.P.; Assa, S.; Daha, M.R.; Pestana, J.O.M.; van Son, W.J.; Franssen, C.F.M.; Seelen, M.A. Intradialytic Complement Activation Precedes the Development of Cardiovascular Events in Hemodialysis Patients. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Tereshchenko, L.G.; Posnack, N.G. Does plastic chemical exposure contribute to sudden death of patients on dialysis? Heart Rhythm 2019, 16, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cheung, A.K.; Hohnholt, M.; Gilson, J. Adherence of neutrophils to hemodialysis membranes: Role of complement receptors. Kidney Int. 1991, 40, 1123–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Martin, U.; Bock, D.; Arseniev, L.; Tornetta, M.A.; Ames, R.S.; Bautsch, W.; Köhl, J.; Ganser, A.; Klos, A. The Human C3a Receptor Is Expressed on Neutrophils and Monocytes, but Not on B or T Lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 186, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Schreiber, A.; Xiao, H.; Jennette, J.C.; Schneider, W.; Luft, F.C.; Kettritz, R. C5a Receptor Mediates Neutrophil Activation and ANCA-Induced Glomerulonephritis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kourtzelis, I.; Markiewski, M.M.; Doumas, M.; Rafail, S.; Kambas, K.; Mitroulis, I.; Panagoutsos, S.; Passadakis, P.; Vargemezis, V.; Magotti, P.; et al. Complement anaphylatoxin C5a contributes to hemodialysis-associated thrombosis. Blood 2010, 116, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Graulich, J.; Walzog, B.; Marcinkowski, M.; Bauer, K.; Kössel, H.; Fuhrmann, G.; Bührer, C.; Gaehtgens, P.; Versmold, H.T. Leukocyte and Endothelial Activation in a Laboratory Model of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO). Pediatr. Res. 2000, 48, 679–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Frerou, A.; Lesouhaitier, M.; Gregoire, M.; Uhel, F.; Gacouin, A.; Reizine, F. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation induces early immune alterations. Crit Care 2021, 25, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Skendros, P.; Mitsios, A.; Chrysanthopoulou, A.; Mastellos, D.C.; Metallidis, S.; Rafailidis, P.; Ntinopoulou, M.; Sertaridou, E.; Tsironidou, V.; Tsigalou, C.; et al. Complement and tissue factor–enriched neutrophil extracellular traps are key drivers in COVID-19 immunothrombosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 6151–6157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Odish, M.F.; Masso-Silva, J.A.; Pollema, T.L.; Owens, R.L.; Alexander, L.E.C.; Meier, A. Initiation of ECMO in patients with COVID-19- related ARDS does not increase blood markers of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) or IL-8. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2024, 38, 1288–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Lingel, M.P.; Haus, M.; Paschke, L.; Foltan, M.; Lubnow, M.; Gruber, M.; Krenkel, L.; Lehle, K. Clinical relevance of cell-free DNA during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Artif. Organs 2023, 47, 1720–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Zhang, Y.; Peng, R.; Pei, S.; Gao, S.; Sun, Y.; Cheng, G.; Yu, D.; Wang, X.; Gao, Z.; Ji, B.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps are increased after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support initiation and present in thrombus: A preclinical study using sheep as an animal model. Thromb. Res. 2023, 221, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bendas, G.; Schlesinger, M. The GPIb-IX complex on platelets: Insight into its novel physiological functions affecting immune surveillance, hepatic thrombopoietin generation, platelet clearance and its relevance for cancer development and metastasis. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2022, 11, 19. [Google Scholar]
  123. Lopes da Silva, M.; Cutler, D.F. von Willebrand factor multimerization and the polarity of secretory pathways in endothelial cells. Blood 2016, 128, 277–285. [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhang, X.F.; Zhang, W.; Quach, M.E.; Deng, W.; Li, R. Force-Regulated Refolding of the Mechanosensory Domain in the Platelet Glycoprotein Ib-IX Complex. Biophys. J. 2019, 116, 1960–1969. [Google Scholar]
  125. Rauch, A.; Dupont, A.; Rosa, M.; Desvages, M.; Le Tanno, C.; Abdoul, J.; Didelot, M.; Ung, A.; Ruez, R.; Jeanpierre, E.; et al. Shear Force-Induced Platelet Clearance Is a New Mechanism of Thrombocytopenia. Circ. Res. 2023, 133, 826–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Hiura, H.; Matsui, T.; Matsumoto, M.; Hori, Y.; Isonishi, A.; Kato, S. Proteolytic fragmentation and sugar chains of plasma ADAMTS13 purified by a conformation-dependent monoclonal antibody. J. Biochem. 2010, 148, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Morrisette, M.J.; Zomp-Wiebe, A.; Bidwell, K.L.; Dunn, S.P.; Gelvin, M.G.; Money, D.T.; Palkimas, S. Antithrombin supplementation in adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion 2020, 35, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Mansour, A.; Berahou, M.; Odot, J.; Pontis, A.; Parasido, A.; Reizine, F.; Launey, Y.; Garlantézec, R.; Flecher, E.; Lecompte, T.; et al. Antithrombin Levels and Heparin Responsiveness during Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Prospective Single-center Cohort Study. Anesthesiology 2024, 140, 1153–1164. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Table 1. Studies describing heparin resistance in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). APTT - activated partial thromboplastin time, AT - antithrombin, HR – heparin resistance, UFH – unfractionated heparin.
Table 1. Studies describing heparin resistance in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). APTT - activated partial thromboplastin time, AT - antithrombin, HR – heparin resistance, UFH – unfractionated heparin.
Study Type
Participants (n)
Duration (Mean/Median)
Cohort (Age)
Publication Year		 Type of ECMO,
Goal		 Traits of
Heparin Resistance		 Other
Anticoagulant		 Complications
1. Case series [20]
n = 6
7 days
Pediatric (4–15 у)
2024		 VA-ECMO:
Cardiac,
COVID-19		 HR: n = 1 (16.6%)
(1) anti-Xa < 0.35 IU/mL,
(2) thrombosis of ECMO circuit		 Switch to
bivalirudin
n = 1 (16.6%)		 Thrombosis on VA-ECMO:
n = 4 (57%)
2. Retrospective [21]
n = 197
Adults
2024		 VA-ECMO, VV-ECMO HR: n = 47
(1) UFH > 35,000 IU/d (n = 33, 16.8%)
(2) UFH > 20 IU/kg/h (n = 14, 7.1%)		 HR is not associated with thrombogenesis (IRR 0.93)
Thrombosis is associated with
VA-ECMO (IRR, 2.29) and COVID-19 (IRR, 2.33)
3. Retrospective [14]
n = 191
Pediatrics (65 d)
6 days
2024		 ECMO (201 runs):
VA—86.6%
VV—13.4%
Pulmonary 41.3%
Cardiac 26.9%
ECPR 31.8%		 HR: n = 50 ECMO runs
(1) Anti-Xa ≤ 0.3 
IU/mL
(2) UFH > 40 units/kg/h
(3) UFH ↑ ≥ 2 in 24 h 		Hemorrhage: n = 26 (12.9%)
Intracranial hemorrhage: n = 15 (7.5%)
Cerebral infarction: n = 18 (9.0%)
Circuit clot formation: n = 30 (14.9%)
Mortality: n = 112 (55%)
4. Retrospective [22]
n = 27
Pediatric (4 m.o.)
6 days
2023		 VA-ECMO 88.9%
VV-ECMO 11.1%
Pulmonary 18.5%
Cardiac 66.7%
ECPR 14.8%		 HR: n =1 (3.7%)
(1) Subtherapeutic APTT
(2) UFH = 26 IU/kg/h
(3) AT = N		 Switch to
bivalirudin
n = 1		 Bleeding: n = 12 (44%)
Circuit change: n = 3 (11.1%)
Mortality: n = 7 (25.9%)
5. Case report [23]
n = 1
2022		 ECMO
Pulmonary,
COVID-19		 HR: > 35 000 IU/d
UFH = 43 200 U/d		 UFH + argatroban:
(1) ACT:
180–200 s
(2) APTT:
55–60 s		 Deep venous thrombosis
6. Retrospective [24]
n = 67
Adult
8.38 ± 5.69 days
2021		 VA-ECMO 65%
VV-ECMO 34%		 HR: n = 34 ≥ 1 d
(1) UFH ≥ 35,000 IU/d
(2) anti-Xa < 0.35 IU/mL for VA-ECMO
(3) anti-Xa < 0.30 IU/mL for VV-ECMO		 No difference in thrombosis and/or bleeding with non-HR group
7. Case series [25]
n = 3
Pediatric
2021		 VA-ECMO,
Cardiac,
COVID-19		 HR: n = 1 (33.3%) n = 1 (33.3%)
Switch to
bivalirudin		 Clots in the arterial cannula; circuit change
8. Observational [26]
11.3 days
2020		 VV-ECMO
Respiratory,
COVID-19		 HR: n = 3 (100%)
(1) UFH > 35,000 IU/d
(2) anti-Xa > 0.7 IU/mL		 Thrombosis; bleeding n = 1 (33.3%)
9. Retrospective [27]
n = 16
Pediatric (59 m.o.)
114 h
2020		 VA-ECMO HR: n = 8 (50%)
(1) subtherapeutic APTT, Anti-Xa
(2) AT < 60%		 Thrombosis n = 3 (18.8%)
Bleeding:
5 events/10 d
Mortality:
n = 5 (31%)
10. Retrospective [28]
n = 19 (adult)
n = 9 (pediatric)
13.1 days
2019		 ECMO
Respiratory 13 (72.2%)
Cardiac 5 (27.8%)		 HR
Pediatric:
(1) anti-Xa < 0.15 IU/mL
(2) UFH = 23.6 units/kg/h
Adult
(1) anti-Xa < 0.19 IU/mL
(2) UFH = 15.3 units/kg/h		 Patients with ≥1 major bleed n = 12 (66.7%), > in adult
Thrombosis events: n = 45
> in children
11. Case report [29]
n = 1
Adult (31 y.o.)
10 days
2019		 VA-ECMO
Circulatory failure		 HR:
(1) ACT < 160 s
(2) APTT 28.5 s
(3) anti-Xa 0.38 IU/mL
(4)UFH = 32 units/kg/h
AT = 90%		 Switch to bivalirudin Circuit thrombus
12. Original [30]
n = 20 HR Pts
Adult (50.5 y.o.)
279.2/176.5 h
2018		 VA-ECMO
cardiac		 HR:
(1) ACT < 180
ACT < 150 (if bleeding)
And/OR
(2) UFH >24,000 IU/d		 Bleeding 80%
Survival 41%
13. Case series [31]
n = 5
Pediatric (1 m.o.)
2014		 ECMO HR:
(2) UFH > 40 units/kg/h,
w/no ↑ in ACT		 rAT dose is not enough to reach desired AT in pediatric Pts on ECMO
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated