Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Pathways to Progress: Market Regulation Transformation and Social Security Enhancement in China

Version 1 : Received: 29 September 2024 / Approved: 11 October 2024 / Online: 11 October 2024 (16:55:50 CEST)

How to cite: Bin, R.; Yi, L.; Xing-ping, L. Pathways to Progress: Market Regulation Transformation and Social Security Enhancement in China. Preprints 2024, 2024100918. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.0918.v1 Bin, R.; Yi, L.; Xing-ping, L. Pathways to Progress: Market Regulation Transformation and Social Security Enhancement in China. Preprints 2024, 2024100918. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.0918.v1

Abstract

The sustainability of social security is increasingly important to countries worldwide, yet the impact of regulation on social security remains controversial. Most scholars and policymakers focus primarily on the influence of social regulation on social security, while to varying degrees neglecting the effects of market regulation. This study employs data on the relaxation of market regulation (RMR) from the Marketization Index of China’s Report (MICR) and balanced panel data for 31 provinces in China from 2008 to 2019. Using instrumental variable methods to address endogeneity issues in the model, we empirically evaluate the impact of China's RMR on the level of social security (SSL) and its underlying mechanisms. The conclusion indicates that for every standard deviation increase in the intensity of RMR by local governments, there is a 2.25% increase in SSL. The study also found that social security expenditure and efficiency serve as mediating variables for the impact of RMR on SSL, but it did not support the mediating role of social security fairness. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing regulation and social security reform in China, as well as useful references for other emerging market economies in identifying priorities for their coordinated regulatory and social security reform.

Keywords

Social security; Market regulation; Medical security; Marketization transformation

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Public, Environmental and Occupational Health

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.