Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Multi-Dimensional Factors of Psychosomatic Health Disparities under the COVID-19 in Japan: Towards Communitarian Interventions

Version 1 : Received: 17 October 2024 / Approved: 17 October 2024 / Online: 18 October 2024 (08:26:36 CEST)

How to cite: Kobayashi, M.; Ishido, H.; Mizushima, J.; Ishikawa, H. Multi-Dimensional Factors of Psychosomatic Health Disparities under the COVID-19 in Japan: Towards Communitarian Interventions. Preprints 2024, 2024101409. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1409.v1 Kobayashi, M.; Ishido, H.; Mizushima, J.; Ishikawa, H. Multi-Dimensional Factors of Psychosomatic Health Disparities under the COVID-19 in Japan: Towards Communitarian Interventions. Preprints 2024, 2024101409. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1409.v1

Abstract

Which measure is the most effective for solving health disparities, biological or economic? It is indispensable to delve into the factors of health disparities to answer this question. Our last paper in this journal analyzed the multi-dimensional factors of psychological health disparity under COVID-19 in Japan. This paper extends the analysis to physical health to explore the issue and proposes the concept of psychosomatic health, bridging the physical and psychological dimensions. It was found that the factors of physical health disparities were close to those of psychological health. According to this new analysis concerning psychosomatic health disparity, not only biological factors but also socio-economic-political factors are essential for the psychosomatic health disparities in the static analysis. In addition, the ethico-political factor of justice/fairness plays a critical role in the dynamic analysis concerning the suppression of the damage to well-being by COVID-19. The result suggests the importance of multi-dimensional communitarian interventions, utilizing the term in political philosophy: it evaluates societal-community intervention as well as biological, political, and economic measures. Therefore, this study implies that, on this empirical basis, public deliberation with the ethical dimension and counting the relative weight of these factors with the temporal dimension in allocating resources is proposed as a theoretically desirable method of the new comprehensive intervention.

Keywords

well-being; psychological health; socio-economic factors; positive psychology; fairness; justice; psychosomatic

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Public, Environmental and Occupational Health

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.