preprints.org > computer science and mathematics > artificial intelligence and machine learning > doi: 10.20944/preprints202410.1491.v1 (registering DOI)

Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Version 1 : Received: 18 October 2024 / Approved: 18 October 2024 / Online: 19 October 2024 (08:50:43 CEST)

This paper provides an in-depth comparative analysis of three prominent machine learning techniques: decision trees, neural networks, and Bayesian networks. Each method is explored in terms of its theoretical foundations, algorithmic structure, strengths, limitations, and real-world applications. Decision trees are celebrated for their simplicity and interpretability, making them ideal for decision-making systems, but they often struggle with overfitting and poor performance on high-dimensional data. Neural networks, while capable of achieving high accuracy and effectively handling complex, non-linear patterns, are criticized for their "black-box" nature and computational intensity. Bayesian networks distinguish themselves through their ability to model uncertainty and incorporate prior knowledge, making them highly applicable in scenarios requiring probabilistic reasoning, yet they are challenging to scale for complex, high-dimensional data sets. This comparative analysis highlights the distinctive advantages of each method, their performance across various domains such as healthcare, finance, and risk assessment, and the growing potential of hybrid models that combine the strengths of these techniques. The paper concludes by discussing future research opportunities, particularly in enhancing model interpretability and scalability while addressing domain-specific challenges.

Decision Trees; Neural Networks; Bayesian Networks; Machine Learning; Classification; Regression; Interpretability; Probabilistic Models; Hybrid Models; Artificial Intelligence

Computer Science and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

* All users must log in before leaving a comment