1. Introduction
To slow down the oxidation process of cooking oil for long-term preservation, manufacturers will add appropriate amounts of oil-soluble antioxidants, such as tert-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), butylhydroxyanisole, dibutylhydroxytoluene, and other food additives to the oil at a later stage of processing [
1,
2]. TBHQ has become one of the widely used food additives in oil due to its strong antioxidant ability, odorless nature, good stability, and low cost [
3,
4]. However, the use of TBHQ in high doses can negatively affect food quality and public health, so many countries have established safety restrictions on the use of TBHQ [
5]. The use of TBHQ in food has been banned in countries and regions such as the European Union, Japan, Canada, Hong Kong, etc [
6]. Chinese national standard (GB2760-2011) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA, USA) stipulate that the use of TBHQ in food must be controlled within 200 μg/g [
7]. Therefore, it is very important to quantify TBHQ in edible oils efficiently. Various methods have been developed for TBHQ detection, including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [
8], gas chromatography [
9], and fluorescence sensing [
10]. These methods usually suffer from the drawbacks of time-consuming sample pre-treatment, complicated operation, use of toxic solvents, and expensive instruments. In contrast, electrochemical sensor with high sensitivity and stability provides researchers with a faster and simpler alternatives [
11,
12].
Li et al. electrodeposited Au nanoparticles on molybdenum disulfide-graphene to prepare a sensor which could detect both TBHQ and butylated hydroxyanisole in food products, due to the catalytic properties of Au nano and the heterogeneous structure of molybdenum disulfide-graphene [
13]. Monteiro et al. developed a photoelectrochemical sensor using CdSe/ZnS core-shell quantum dots and lithium tetracyanoethylate [
14]. The incorporation of the quantum dots and lithium tetracyanoethylate resulted in a significant reduction in the charge transfer resistance of the composite material, with large response currents in the detection of TBHQ in foods [
14]. Jenisha et al. synthesized hierarchically structured antimony tungstate nanoflowers in combination with acidified carbon nanotubes. The composites showed good electrocatalytic ability and were successfully used for the detection of TBHQ in milk [
6]. Yue et al. constructed a molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor using PdAuNPs/ERGO nanomaterials [
15]. Highly catalytically active Pd-Au bimetallic nanoparticles and reduced graphene oxide synergistically amplified the electrochemical signals, and molecular imprinting efficiently and selectively recognized TBHQ [
15]. Many materials were successfully employed to detect TBHQ, but most of the raw materials they used were expensive, which increased the cost of making the sensors. Therefore, the development of low-cost, efficient, and sensitive TBHQ is necessary.
Layered double hydroxides (LDH) can be prepared and synthesized from low-cost precursors by various synthetic routes and are widely used by researchers [
16,
17]. Recent developments in LDH nanomaterials are of great significance in advancing sensor technology for food detection [
18,
19]. Fu et al. used nickel-cobalt layered double hydroxides (Ni-Co LDH) fabricated by electrostatic spinning and chemical deposition techniques and developed a sensor with excellent performance for glucose [
20]. Zhu et al. prepared ultrathin CoAl layered double hydroxide nanosheets by co-precipitation method to construct a QCM humidity sensor [
21], which can monitor the humidity in vegetable packages. Cui et al. used a calcined Cu-LDH with gold nanoparticles composite sensor which detects nitrate in ham [
22]. It can be found that LDHs can be used as catalysts with good hydrolytic and chemical stability [
23,
24]. The use of LDHs improves the selectivity and sensitivity of electrochemical sensors [
25]. The advantages of low cost and excellent catalytic properties of hydrotalcite hold great promise for applications in food analysis [
25,
26]. However, hydrotalcite material alone has the disadvantage of poor electrical conductivity, and the addition of a carbon source to the material is a good solution. Recent advances in the design and synthesis of carbon materials, especially nanomaterials, have demonstrated powerful electrochemical sensing detection capabilities [
27,
28]. Yang et al. designed a porous carbon (Co-N-C@PC) composite electrochemical sensor for detection of acetaminophen, in which the porous carbon was derived from sodium citrate [
29]. Pu et al. pyrolytically synthesized oak biomass charcoal (BC) and BC-Au composites for the simultaneous detection of Cd
2+, Pb
2+, and Hg
2+ [
30]. Tran et al. developed a biosensor to detect breast cancer cells in serum, and the carbon source of the material was derived from passion fruit juice [
31]. Carbon materials provide a large surface area and active sites for adsorption, thus increasing the sensitivity of analyte detection [
32,
33]. In addition, they can be used as supports for other modified materials such as metals [
34], metal oxides [
35], metal hydroxides [
36,
37] and conducting polymers [
30,
37]. The sources of carbon in materials are varied and the right source of carbon can improve the performance of the sensor.
Based on the above studies, NiAl layered double hydroxide with low-cost raw materials and common glucose became our materials for designing an efficient TBHQ electrochemical sensor. In our work, NiAl layered double hydroxides were synthesized on glucose carbon spheres (GC) and then pyrolyzed in a nitrogen atmosphere to prepare a porous carbon nanomaterial (named NiAl-LDH@GC-800) to construct an electrochemical sensor for TBHQ. The incorporation of GC reduces the buildup of NiAl-LDH growth, while the presence of NiAl-LDH during pyrolysis leads to the formation of a porous structure in the carbon spheres. The porous carbon obtained after pyrolysis of GC at 800 °C gives the composites a larger specific surface area, more active sites, and improves the electrical conductivity of the composites. We applied the synthesized porous carbon nanomaterials to the electrochemical sensing detection of TBHQ, and the sensor was responsive and showed a very good linear range compared to existing methods. In addition, the sensor was successfully used to identify and detect TBHQ in three daily cooking oils, demonstrating the practical application capability of the material.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Material
Nickel chloride (NiCl2 ·6H2O) and aluminum chloride (AlCl3·6H2O), tert-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), urea, ammonium fluoride, glucose (Glu), Nafion reagent, Na2SO4, Mg (NO3)2, CaCl2, ascorbic acid (AA), salicylic acid (SA), citric acid (CA), resorcinol (RDP), o-nitrophenol (2-NP), and p-nitrophenol (4-NP) were obtained from Aladdin. Phosphate buffer solution (PBS) was prepared with NaCl、Na2HPO4 and NaHPO4, and the volume of PBS used for each test was 20 mL. All drugs and reagents were of analytical grade standard and could be used without further purification. Ultrapure water (18.25 MΩ cm) was used throughout the experiments.
2.2. Experimental Instruments
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, H7700, Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation) and transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEM-2100, Nippon Electronics Corporation) were used to characterize the morphology of NiAl-LDH@GC-800 and other materials. X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 Discover, Germany) was used to characterize the crystal structure of the materials. The elemental composition of the material surface and its chemical state were analyzed using an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The materials were synthesized using an electric blast chamber (DHG9030A, Shanghai Jinghong Co., Ltd.) and a tube muffle furnace (GMF-12-250, Shanghai Muffle Furnace Co., Ltd.). A vacuum drying oven (VOS-30A, Shanghai Kishan Instruments Co.) was used to remove moisture from the materials. UV-Vis spectroscopy (UV-2450, China Shimadzu Co.) was used for quantitative analysis of the actual samples. Electrochemical tests were performed using the electrochemical workstation (MULTI AUTOLAB M204, Metrohm, Switzerland). The type of glassy carbon electrode (GCE): diameter = 3 mm, surface area = 7.068 mm2, manufacturer is Wuhan GaossUnion. Platinum wire was used as an auxiliary electrode and Ag/AgCl electrode was used as a reference electrode.
2.3. Parameters of Electrochemical Experiments
Electrochemical tests were performed in 0.1 M PBS using cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). CV parameter setting: Start E(V)=-0.3, Stop E(V)=0.3, Scan rate (V⋅s-1) =0.1(in PBS); Start E(V)=-0.2, Stop E(V)=0.6, in a 5.0 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− electrolyte containing 0.1 M KCl (PFS). DPV parameter setting: Start E(V)=-0.3, Stop E(V)=0.3, Step potential(V)=0.005, Modulation amplitude=0.025V, Modulation time=0.05s, Scan rate (V⋅s-1) =0.1 (in PBS). EIS parameter setting: Amplitude=10 mV; pulse width=5 mV; frequency range:100khz-0.1 Hz; open-circuit potential: 0.241V. All electrolyte solutions (0.1 M PBS) were purged with nitrogen for 10 min in advance and the nitrogen atmosphere was maintained throughout the experiment.
2.4. Synthesis Process
Synthesis of GC [
38]: 2 g of glucose was dissolved in 60 mL of ultrapure water and stirred for 20 min, then the solution was transferred to a 100 mL Teflon hot press vessel, heated at 180°C for 4 h, cooled naturally, washed three times with ultrapure water, and dried under vacuum at 60°C for 10 h. The black powder product is recorded as GC.
Synthesis of NiAl-LDH@GC: 50 mg of GC,0.3 mmol of NiCl
2·6H
2O, and 0.1 mmol of AlCl
3·6H
2O were added into a mixture of 30 mL of ultrapure water and 30 ml of ethanol and stirred at room temperature for 1 h. Then 2 mmol of urea and 2 mmol of NH
4F were added and stirred for 20 min, and then the mixture was transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave vessel and heated the reaction at 160℃ for 6 h. After natural cooling, the precipitate was washed three times with ultrapure water and anhydrous ethanol until the pH was neutral to obtain a brown precipitate. The brown product was dried at 60°C for 10 h under vacuum. The product obtained was noted as NiAl-LDH@GC. NiAl-LDH was synthesized without the addition of GC [
39].
Synthesis of NiAl-LDH@GC-800: 30 mg of NiAl-LDH@GC was heated in a muffle furnace at T = 800℃ for 2 h at a ramp rate of 5℃ /min under 0.2 L/min of N2. After natural cooling, the black powder material was noted as NiAl-LDH@GC-800. NiAl-LDH@GC-700 and NiAl-LDH@GC-900 were prepared by the same method at temperatures of 700℃ and 900℃, respectively. In addition, GC-800 and NiAl-LDH-800 were calcined.
2.5. Preparation of NiAl-LDH@GC-800/GCE
Firstly, an appropriate amount of 0.05 µm Al
2O
3 powder dissolved in ultrapure water was placed on a polishing cloth to polish the glassy carbon electrode (GCE) and sequentially sonicated with anhydrous ethanol and water for 5 min. Afterward, the glassy carbon electrodes were dried under an infrared lamp for about 3 minutes to be used for drop-coating the material. 2 mg of NiAl-LDH@GC-800 was prepared as a suspension of 2 mg/mL in deionized water and uniformly sonicated for 2 h. Six μL of NiAl-LDH@GC-800 was pipetted onto the pre-treated glassy carbon electrode, and the electrode was dried by exposing it to the infrared light. After film formation, 3 μL of Nafion was taken by pipette gun and dropped onto the treated GCE, which was then exposed to IR light for drying. In addition, we prepared other contrasting material electrodes using the same method. The synthesis process of NiAl-LDH@GC-800 and the fabrication of NiAl-LDH@GC-800/GCE are shown in
Scheme 1.
2.6. Preparation of Test Samples
Edible chili oil, peanut oil, and rapeseed oil were purchased from local supermarkets. To determine the TBHQ content in various real samples, the real samples were treated as follows [
40]: 0.5 mL of chili oil, peanut oil, and rapeseed oil were taken into centrifuge tubes and 5 ml of ethanol was added. A vortex shaker (JOANLAB, VM-300) was used to shake the samples in the three centrifuge tubes for 20 min to mix the samples thoroughly. 2 mL of the supernatant was taken as the test sample.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Yixi Xie and Jin Zhang; methodology, Yixi Xie; validation, Jinrong Chen; formal analysis, Yixi Xie; investigation, Jinrong Chen; resources, Jin Zhang; data curation, Jin Zhang; writing—original draft preparation, Jin Zhang; writing—review and editing, Yixi Xie; visualization, Jiejun Li; supervision, Yixi Xie; project administration, Yixi Xie; funding acquisition, Jin Zhang and Yixi Xie. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Scheme 1.
Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of NiAl-LDH@GC-800 and the fabrication of NiAl-LDH@GC-800/GCE.
Scheme 1.
Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of NiAl-LDH@GC-800 and the fabrication of NiAl-LDH@GC-800/GCE.
Figure 1.
(A) SEM images of NiAl-LDH, (B) SEM images of GC, (C–D) SEM images of NiAl-LDH@GC, (E) SEM image of NiAl-LDH800, (F–H) SEM images of NiAl-LDH@GC800, (I) TEM images of NiAl-LDH@GC800, and (J-P) EDS element mapping of NiAl-LDH@GC800.
Figure 1.
(A) SEM images of NiAl-LDH, (B) SEM images of GC, (C–D) SEM images of NiAl-LDH@GC, (E) SEM image of NiAl-LDH800, (F–H) SEM images of NiAl-LDH@GC800, (I) TEM images of NiAl-LDH@GC800, and (J-P) EDS element mapping of NiAl-LDH@GC800.
Figure 2.
(A) XRD patterns of NiAl-LDH, NiAl-LDH@GC, and NiAl-LDH@GC800. (B) Overall spectrum for the NiAl-LDH, NiAl-LDH@GC, and NiAl-LDH@GC800. (C–D) XPS spectra of the Ni 2p, Al 2p.
Figure 2.
(A) XRD patterns of NiAl-LDH, NiAl-LDH@GC, and NiAl-LDH@GC800. (B) Overall spectrum for the NiAl-LDH, NiAl-LDH@GC, and NiAl-LDH@GC800. (C–D) XPS spectra of the Ni 2p, Al 2p.
Figure 3.
(A) The Nyquist plots of four modified electrodes. (B) CV of four modified electrodes in 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3-/4-. (C) DPVs of NiAl-LDH, NiAl-LDH@GC, NiAl-LDH800, GC800, NiAl-LDH@GC700, NiAl-LDH@GC800, and NiAl-LDH@GC900 in 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7) containing 5 × 10−6 M TBHQ. (D) Ipa of NiAl-LDH800 and six contrasting material-modified electrodes.
Figure 3.
(A) The Nyquist plots of four modified electrodes. (B) CV of four modified electrodes in 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3-/4-. (C) DPVs of NiAl-LDH, NiAl-LDH@GC, NiAl-LDH800, GC800, NiAl-LDH@GC700, NiAl-LDH@GC800, and NiAl-LDH@GC900 in 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7) containing 5 × 10−6 M TBHQ. (D) Ipa of NiAl-LDH800 and six contrasting material-modified electrodes.
Figure 4.
(A) CVs of TBHQ on NiAl-LDH @ GC-800/GCE at different pH in 0.1 M PBS containing 5× 10-6 M TBHQ. (B) The dependence of Epa and Epc on pH. (C) CV overlay of different scan rates of NiAl-LDH@GC-800/GCE. (D) Dependence of the oxidation and reduction peak current on scan rate. (E) Log relationship between ipa and scan rate. (F) Plot of log of scan rate versus potential.
Figure 4.
(A) CVs of TBHQ on NiAl-LDH @ GC-800/GCE at different pH in 0.1 M PBS containing 5× 10-6 M TBHQ. (B) The dependence of Epa and Epc on pH. (C) CV overlay of different scan rates of NiAl-LDH@GC-800/GCE. (D) Dependence of the oxidation and reduction peak current on scan rate. (E) Log relationship between ipa and scan rate. (F) Plot of log of scan rate versus potential.
Figure 5.
(A) DPV responses with different TBHQ concentrations. (B) Plot of oxidation peak current value versus TBHQ concentration. (C) The DPV curves of TBHQ (5 μM) in PBS (0.1 M) solution containing different interfering substances. (D) Demonstration of anti-interference capability (0.5 μM TBHQ). (E) Demonstration of the stability of the same modified electrode (10 tests). (F) Demonstration of the reproducibility of differently modified electrodes (10 electrodes).
Figure 5.
(A) DPV responses with different TBHQ concentrations. (B) Plot of oxidation peak current value versus TBHQ concentration. (C) The DPV curves of TBHQ (5 μM) in PBS (0.1 M) solution containing different interfering substances. (D) Demonstration of anti-interference capability (0.5 μM TBHQ). (E) Demonstration of the stability of the same modified electrode (10 tests). (F) Demonstration of the reproducibility of differently modified electrodes (10 electrodes).
Figure 6.
(A) UV–vis spectra of TBHQ standard solution (10 - 80 μM). (B) The linearity of absorbance versus TBHQ concentration. UV–vis spectra of (C) Chili oil, (D) Peanut oil, (E) Rapeseed oil. (F) Comparison of TBHQ content in real samples measured by UV and sensor methods.
Figure 6.
(A) UV–vis spectra of TBHQ standard solution (10 - 80 μM). (B) The linearity of absorbance versus TBHQ concentration. UV–vis spectra of (C) Chili oil, (D) Peanut oil, (E) Rapeseed oil. (F) Comparison of TBHQ content in real samples measured by UV and sensor methods.