Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Teams, Tools, Processes and Resources to Manage Oncologic Clinical Decision Support: Lessons Learned from City of Hope’s Multistate, Academic, and Community Oncology Enterprise

Version 1 : Received: 26 October 2024 / Approved: 26 October 2024 / Online: 28 October 2024 (13:39:31 CET)

How to cite: Bosserman, MD, PhD, L. D. D.; Lin, PharmD, Y.; Shayani, PharmD, S.; Moore, B.; Morse, D.; Enwere, PharmD, E.; Kosel, M.; Lardner, M.; Trisal, MD, V.; Samara, PharmD, W. Teams, Tools, Processes and Resources to Manage Oncologic Clinical Decision Support: Lessons Learned from City of Hope’s Multistate, Academic, and Community Oncology Enterprise. Preprints 2024, 2024102081. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.2081.v1 Bosserman, MD, PhD, L. D. D.; Lin, PharmD, Y.; Shayani, PharmD, S.; Moore, B.; Morse, D.; Enwere, PharmD, E.; Kosel, M.; Lardner, M.; Trisal, MD, V.; Samara, PharmD, W. Teams, Tools, Processes and Resources to Manage Oncologic Clinical Decision Support: Lessons Learned from City of Hope’s Multistate, Academic, and Community Oncology Enterprise. Preprints 2024, 2024102081. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.2081.v1

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) consisting of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and oncology pathways serve as the foundation of high-quality cancer care. However, the resources needed to develop and maintain these systems have not been characterized for oncology enterprises. Methods: Missing CPOEs for oncology treatments were identified by comparing current CPOEs to those in the Elsevier ClinicalPath treatment pathways. New FDA oncology drug approvals were used to estimate ongoing CPOE build needs. The impacts of missing orders on clinicians and pharmacists were surveyed. Benchmarking from two other large oncology enterprises supported new resource needs to build and maintain CPOE in our EPIC Beacon system. A program to manage oncology pathways and CPOE for an enterprise using EPIC was developed and implemented. Results: Resources and impacts of CDSS for oncology enterprises are described. Program management is described. Conclusions: Updating and maintaining CDSS for an oncology enterprise requires program management and resources for which a framework has not been previously reported. We present this work as a framework for others to understand the components and resources for budgeting and management of CDSS. We report on the work of the City of Hope enterprise using the EPIC electronic health record.

Keywords

clinical decision support systems; CDSS; oncology pathways; computerized physician order entry; CPOE; EPIC; Beacon; resources; program framework; high-quality cancer care

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Oncology and Oncogenics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.