Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

Comparative Analysis of LSTM and Traditional Time Series Models on Oil Price Data

Version 1 : Received: 28 October 2024 / Approved: 29 October 2024 / Online: 30 October 2024 (10:38:57 CET)

How to cite: Brown, M.; Chen, E.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J.; Kim, A.; Johnson, R. Comparative Analysis of LSTM and Traditional Time Series Models on Oil Price Data. Preprints 2024, 2024102355. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.2355.v1 Brown, M.; Chen, E.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J.; Kim, A.; Johnson, R. Comparative Analysis of LSTM and Traditional Time Series Models on Oil Price Data. Preprints 2024, 2024102355. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.2355.v1

Abstract

Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks have gained attention for their forecasting capabilities, especially in volatile markets like oil. This study compares LSTM networks with traditional time series models such as ARIMA and Exponential Smoothing in predicting oil prices. We analyze a comprehensive dataset of historical oil price movements and apply preprocessing techniques to ensure the reliability of our model training and evaluation processes. The models are evaluated using metrics like Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) to measure their forecasting performance. The results demonstrate that LSTM networks significantly outperform traditional time series models, effectively capturing price trends and fluctuations. Additionally, LSTM shows enhanced adaptability to sudden changes in the market, while traditional models tend to struggle in such scenarios. This comparative analysis underscores the significance of model selection in time series forecasting, especially for industries characterized by high volatility, and suggests a shift towards utilizing LSTM for enhanced financial forecasting accuracy. Future research may further investigate hybrid models that combine the strengths of both LSTM and traditional methodologies.

Keywords

ARIMA; LSTM; Oil Prices Prediction

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Other

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.