Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

An Integrated Review of Transitional Care for Families of Pre-Term Infants

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

03 November 2024

Posted:

04 November 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This study was conducted to identify the key elements of transitional care for families with pre-term infants in South Korea. We used an integrative review methodology proposed by Whittemore and Knafle in 2005. During the problem identification step, the review question was constructed via the population, intervention, outcome, and timeframe (PIOT) format. During the literature search step, integrative reviews of published literature from nine electronic databases were undertaken and a total of 14 studies were reviewed that met our inclusion criteria. During the data evaluation step, the quality of the literature was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) developed by Hong et al. in 2019. We identified three domains and 10 key attributes of transitional care for families of pre-term infants. The parenting empowerment domain included growth and development, developmental promotion, nutrition, safe environment, general parenting, and parent-infant interaction. The emotional support domain included counseling, advocacy, and community network. The social support domain included professional collaboration. Efforts should continue to further develop programs and policies to enhance transitional care for families of pre-term infants that reflect South Korean nursing practices.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Pre-term infants are defined as live-birth babies that are born before 37 weeks of gestation. In 2020, 13.4 million babies, or 10% of newborn births, were born prematurity [1], and Korea’s premature birth rate in 2022 is 9.8%, an increase of 1.6 times in 10 years[a]. Between 28 and 40 weeks of gestation, the fetus is preparing for life after birth by accumulating subcutaneous fat, as well as further developing its central nervous, respiratory, and gastrointestinal systems [3]. Pre-term infants are often born with life-threatening health conditions and various growth and developmental conditions because they do not have enough time to properly develop in utero. Fortunately, owing to rapid medical advances and improved neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) care, survival rates have increased and the prognoses of pre-term infants have improved significantly in terms of severe health-related complications.
Although pre-term infants who are discharged from hospital have shown many improvements in health, they are often much weaker than full-term infants and require constant attention to address their various medical complications, as well as growth and developmental issues. Due to this, parents are often pleased to return home with their babies—but may also be confused by the burden of caring for a fragile infant, feeling unprepared and experiencing vague fears [4,5]. Parents caring for pre-term infants at home may therefore seek out more specialized support throughout the process of raising a pre-term infant. Specifically, they often want to learn about proper feeding practices, any available expert support from the community or local healthcare providers, and creating a safe environment in which to raise a vulnerable child [6,7].
Transitional care focuses on helping pre-term infants prepare for the transition from the NICU to home, as well as initiating supportive developmental care at home. It includes general infant care, as well as specialized care for pre-term infants. The main goals of transitional care are to improve parenting and nurturing skills and to build parent-child attachments [8]. The main challenges faced in this practice are pre-discharge planning, education, home equipment, and home visits by healthcare providers. The latter are typically conducted through home visits that involve skilled healthcare personnel, including neonatal nurse practitioners [9,10].
In South Korea, research on nursing care for pre-term infants has been considered important and has been conducted continuously. Most related research topics have focused on NICU inpatient care and discharge education; therefore, there is a lack of research on transitional care [11]. In addition, there are not enough systems and policies for transitional care and few in-home support systems for families of pre-term infants [12,13]. As a result, parents of preterm infants spend a great deal of personal energy managing their own care environment and acquiring the parenting skills necessary to raise a pre-term infant, which increases the stress and burden of parenting. Therefore, various studies and efforts are warranted to identify and establish transitional care for families with preterm infants.
We aimed to identify the important elements of transitional care for families with pre-term infants in South Korea, to collect basic data for the development of related programmes, and to suggest beneficial future directions of transitional care for families with preterm infants suitable for domestic implementation.

2. Theoretical Framework

This study used the neonatal transitional care (NTC) model as a conceptual framework. This model is based on the philosophies of family-centered care (FCC) and transitional theory [14].
FCC is a philosophy and method of healthcare delivery that recognizes parents as experts in terms of their children’s needs, promotes partnerships between parents and healthcare providers, and supports the family’s role in decision-making for their children [15]. Transition theory recognizes that transition is a psychological process of adapting to change that is most often associated with developmental stages, changes in health, and changes in the social environment [16]. Therapeutic interventions by nurses also play important roles in transitional theory [14,16].
NTC is a program model that supports parents in caring for their children following discharge from the NICU, because most premature infants are discharged from the NICU with health conditions that are more difficult to care for than those of full-term infants [14]. The main goals of NTC are whole-family involvement, facility and financial support, emotional support for the family, linkage to community health services, and information sharing [14]. NTC begins with several meetings prior to discharge, aimed at identifying the family’s needs and building a therapeutic relationship. This process continues after discharge through home visits or phone consultations. Highlights include infant assessment, development, feeding routines, medication administration, family health and wellness, and discussion of maternal depression [17]. The development of a specialized multidisciplinary team that includes midwives, neonatal nurses, medical staff, and ancillary personnel is essential for successful NTC implementation—as is the development of family contact protocols, including family visits and telephone counseling [14].
The benefits of NTC include improved maternal mental health, increased breastfeeding rates, enhanced confidence and ability to bond with the baby in parents, minimized length of NICU stay and reduced readmission rates, facilitated effective discharge planning for infants with complex conditions, and improved multidisciplinary collaboration [18].
In Republic of Korea, FCC has been emphasized in clinical practice, including NICUs, and has been utilized as a basic theory for nursing interventions to improve mother-infant attachment during hospitalization and to emphasize the role of parents in discharge education [11,13]. However, transitional care at home after discharge is still inadequate [12]. Therefore, it is necessary to identify precedents of well-established home visiting nursing systems and parenting care programs using internet-based smart devices in other countries and consider them in detail [31,32]. In addition, institutional support for families of premature infants returning home after NICU discharge is needed to adapt the results to Korean conditions. This will be preceded by efforts to gradually develop programs based on transitional care, along with education to improve clinical practice understanding of transitional care.

3. Materials and Methods

1). Research Design

This study was designed following the integrative review format proposed by Whittmore and Knafl in 2005 [19]. It followed the format’s five stages to thoroughly explore developmental supportive care within the homes of families with pre-term infants, toddlers, and newborns. These five stages included: problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation.

2). Research Procedure

Step 1: Problem identification
It is important to clearly identify the purpose of any literature review or study [19]. Such central questions can be formulated using the population, intervention, outcome, and timeframe (PIOT) format [20]. For this study, the population (P) refers to families with a pre-term infants in their home. The interventions (I) comprised the essential components of a transitional program needed for families with pre-term infants living at home. The outcome (O) measured health and well-being indicators in both parents and pre-term infants. The timeframe (T) was the time spent at home following discharge from the NICU.
The review question adopted was “What are the key components of transitional care for families with pre-term infants after NICU discharge?” (Table 1).
Step 2: Literature search
The literature search is the process of identifying all appropriate sources for a topic. It should include precise search terms, the databases used, additional search strategies, and inclusion and exclusion criteria to increase the rigor of the review [19].
The literature search period for this study was from June to November of 2023, and the eligible publication period was between 2012 and 2022. The databases searched included KISS, RISS, NDSL, and DBpia in South Korea, as well as Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Science Direct abroad. We searched using the following search terms: pre-term infant, parents, developmental(ly), support care, in(at)-home, transitional care, home based, and discharge NICU. The phrase approach utilized a strategy of combining search terms and keywords with “AND”, “OR”, and the wildcard symbol (*) to include more relevant results.
*Inclusion criteria
In this review, we included 1) studies of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods spanning articles, interventions, reports, components or strategies, reviews, and theses. 2) The included studies were those concerning infants and their parents at home after discharge from the NICU. 3) Papers written in both English and Korean were included, to address more of the available information.
*Exclusion criteria
To ensure that our search was accurate, we excluded studies based on the following criteria: 1) those that included interventions for patients hospitalized in the NICU, 2) studies for which the full text was inaccessible. 3) Studies such as other reviews, case studies, and case reports.
A total of 620 records were identified in our primary search. During the electronic database search, manual searches were performed in parallel to search for additional documents or studies that could be included. After excluding 491 papers that did not meet our inclusion criteria, 90 papers duplicates, 21 papers with unclear content (not enough transitional care contents), and 4 papers that were deemed low-quality, a total of 14 papers were selected for inclusion (Figure 1).
Step 3: Dataevaluation
The data evaluation step of an integrative review is the process of assessing the quality of the selected literature. Because there are no set standards for assessing and interpreting quality, methods for assessing quality vary depending on the study design [19].
In this study, the quality of the literature was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) developed by Hong et al. in 2019 [21]. The MMAT is an assessment tool designed to evaluate the quality of various research designs in the literature, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies. To assess methodological quality, the MMAT (ver. 2018) consisted of two screening questions and 20 items: qualitative (5 questions), randomized controlled trial (5 questions), non-randomized (5 questions), quantitative descriptive (5 questions), and mixed methods (5 questions). Each question could be answered with “yes”, “no”, or “can’t tell” (in terms of reporting of unclear information related to the criterion), with “no” and “can’t tell” being considered low-quality papers.
During the quality appraisal process, two of the authors rigorously reviewed and analyzed the content of the 20 selected articles using MMAT. We conducted several online and offline meetings to discuss and reach a consensus. In any cases of disagreement, a doctor of nursing with experience in integrative reviews was consulted to make a final assessment. As a result, we eliminated 6 articles that did not meet our criteria for topic clarity and methodological appropriateness, including one article whose scope was limited to rehabilitation (1), three studies whose population was limited to children with disabilities and chronic illnesses (3), and two studies whose scope was limited to the time of NICU admission (2). The remaining 14 articles had clear research topics, research methods, and procedures, met the study objectives, and were free of statistical errors (Table 2).
Step 4: Data analysis and presentation
The data analysis step is important for the innovative synthesis of data and unbiased interpretation of primary literature. It should present tables or figures to demonstrate the logic of the data analysis [19]. The final 14 selected articles were reviewed iteratively to derive systematic categories through reduction, redefinition, comparison, and synthesis, which were then tabulated (Table 4). We then organized the key attributes of transitional care for families with pre-term infants, and presented them in another table (Table 5).

4. Results

1). Characteristics of the 14 Included Articles

The publication years of the articles on transitional care for pre-term infants selected for this study were: 2012-2015 (5; 35.7%), 2016-2019 (6; 42.9%), and 2020-2022 (3; 21.4%). In terms of study design, a total of 11 (78.6%) quantitative studies were published, of which seven (50.2%) were RCTs and two (2.2%) were quasi-experimental studies or cohort studies. Three (21.4%) qualitative studies explored parents’ feelings regarding raising their children at home after discharge from the NICU. Two of the qualitative studies [34,35] explored satisfaction and parental experiences with transitional care programs. One of the qualitative studies [33] focused on the experiences and care needs of parents caring for their pre-term infants at home after discharge from the NICU and did not include a transitional care program. Two of the studies [26,34] applied theoretical concepts, including ET and FCC (Table 3).

2). Methods of Transitional Care

The subjects of the studies included mothers, parents (both mothers and fathers), infants, and families (mother-infant). Of these, five [22,25,26,32,35] involved only mothers. The remaining nine included parents and families. We found that 11 (78.6%) of the reports focused on mothers, indicating that mothers represent a crucial component of the transition period. However, it is also noteworthy that the focus of parenting is not limited to just mothers, as we also saw an increasing number of parenting articles since 2020 that included fathers (Table 4).
The methods used for transitional care included home visits, telephone consultations, video consultations, and smartphone-based approaches. Four of the included studies used only home visits (two published in 2015 [28,29] and two published in 2017 [23,25]). Four studies combined home visits and telephone counseling (one published in each of 2012 [26], 2015 [22], 2016 [24], and 2022 [34]). One study, published in 2021, used video consultation [33], but had a qualitative design that explored experiences with transition interventions. Two studies implemented internet-based education and interventions (one published in 2013 [27] and one in 2016 [30]). Two studies used smartphone app-based interventions—conducted in 2016 [31] and 2022 [32]. Both were RCTs designed to prove the effectiveness of a smartphone-based transitional care program. Since 2012, the main medium of transitional care provision has been home visits and telephone consultations. It could thus be seen that the changes in the medium of care delivery paralleled the development of ICT technology.
The duration of transitional care ranged from 3 weeks to 12 months. The number of articles with a 1month period was the highest (four articles [22,26,31,33]), followed by 3 months (three articles [25,27,28]), 6 months (two articles [29,34]), and 12 months (three articles [23,24,32]). The shortest intervention period was 3 weeks [30] using web applications and video interviews (Table 4).

3). Measurement of Transitional Care

The outcome variables used to test the effectiveness of each transitional care program varied significantly. In this study, the variables that showed significant results on effectiveness were summarized, and the variables were measured separately for parents (specifically mothers) and infants. The variables measured for parents included maternal anxiety [22,28], confidence in one’s parenting role [22], parenting knowledge [33], parenting satisfaction [27,30], parents’ quality of life [28], and parenting competence [31]. Most of these were measured using psycho-emotional indicators. For infants, whose levels of emotional development are incomplete, physical growth and developmental indicators were used. These indicators included physical health [28], development [24,29], mortality rate & immunization [23], rate of visive to clinics [23,25,30], and rate of illness [26] (Table 4).

4). Contents of Transitional Care

We identified 3 domains and 10 key attributes of transitional care programs for families with pre-term infants. The three domains were parenting empowerment, emotional support, and social support (Table 5). The goal of successful transitional care for families of pre-term infants is to ensure successful growth and development at home. parenting skills that reflect the characteristics of their own child, are a critical success factor in transitional care, and can be achieved through systematic parent education that begins before discharge from the hospital. Emotional support from medical staffs through visiting and telephone counseling, as well as social support from public health centers and community healthcare professionals, played a nourishing role in strengthening parenting empowerments. we visualized as shown Figure 2 to help you understand the key areas and interactions of the transition.

Parental Empowerment

The largest component of the transitional care program was the educational intervention. These interventions aimed to improve the parenting skills of parents experiencing transitional care at home following discharge from the hospital. Of the 14 studies analyzed, 13 included educational interventions. All of these included information concerning child growth, development, and monitoring during transitional care. Two of the articles [30,31] included information related to understanding the characteristics and activities of pre-term infants. Skin-to-skin care [30], touching [22,23,24], sensory stimulation [28], and rehabilitation [34] were analyzed as interventions used to promote growth and development.
Nutrition was also discussed in most of the literature. Regarding nutrition, the most common topics were breastfeeding maintenance and management [22,25,27,29,30], as well as preparing nutrition [32,34]. Pre-term infants are less likely to be able to properly breastfeed in the beginning, owing to their NICU stays and physical characteristics. However, breast milk is the best source of nutrition for infants, and nursing practitioners strongly encourage parents to breastfeed. Therefore, it was expected that breastfeeding would be included in transitional care programs.
These programs also included a section concerning safe environments for preterm infants. Safe environments are one of the primary concerns of most parents, as it is necessary for vulnerable infants to be raised in normal family environments rather than clinical settings. The difference between maintaining a safe environment in a typical infant care home is the inclusion of specialized medical equipment. Specifically, injury prevention [23], emergency care [26], medication, and nutritional support [23,29] may all make use of medical devices. Infant monitoring, O2 supply [22], follow-up scheduling [23], and environmental care [24,26,32] were also included in many transitional care programs. General infant care included bathing [22,29,32], safe sleep [32,34], addressing crying [23], and parent-infant interactions [24,28].

Emotional Support

Transitional care can also include emotional support for parents. During discharge from the hospital and transition to home, the object of care remains the same, but its focus shifts from the healthcare professional to the parent. During this time, parents can experience emotional difficulties as they may feel unprepared to meet their child’s diverse needs. Therefore, support for parents in transition care is essential. Six of our included articles (44.4%) included emotional support for parents. Transition program content in the experimental design literature included counseling & support [29,31], coping with care [27,29], comfort support & understanding care plans [25], and communication and sharing of concerns [25,27]. The qualitative studies exploring the experiences of parents providing care at home [33,34,35] found that parents wanted to be supported and counseled to help them feel confident in their parenting.

Social Support

The area of social support cannot be overlooked during transitional care. Parents who are raising premature babies at home may experience social isolation. It can become difficult for parents to leave the house, owing to the child’s immunological fragility. Their time may become limited by their caregiving duties, and they may feel socially isolated because they lack the skills to solve the various problems that arise during the process [5]. The needs of parents experiencing transition at home include “dealing with social networks” [33], professional support for families, governmental economic support [35], and professional collaboration [34,35]. A multidisciplinary team care setting consisting of neonatal specialists, social workers, rehabilitation therapists, pediatricians, and other professionals is crucial for successful transitional care. In addition, economic support and social networks for efficient team functioning represent important aspects of transitional care in the long term.

5. Discussion

This study was an integrative review of current literature regarding the topic of transitional care for parents caring for pre-term infants at home following discharge from the NICU. It was conducted to identify the main contents of transitional care for families of pre-term infants to form a basis for the development of future transitional care programs. The future directions of transitional care in South Korea are also discussed, focusing on the main attributes identified in this study.
In recent years (i.e., since 2020), the target population for pre-term infants nursing care has been expanded from just mothers to include both parents and other family members as well. Because pregnancy and childbirth are performed by women, the responsibility of childcare has also often fallen on women alone in the past. However, since the 21st century, as FCC models have been commercialized [36], the role of child care has been expanded to include other family members as well. Since 2010, the number of studies focusing on fathers in pre-term infants research has been increasing [37,38,39], and the research subjects in such studies have been expanding to include all parents. Hemle Jerntorp et al. (2020) provided an FCC-based parent support program. This is a transitional care program that uses therapeutic communication to provide information about infant health and care. They found that fathers who experienced the transitional care program wanted to be good partners and collaborators with their spouses and health care professionals and felt a very strong sense of responsibility for their children [40]. Mӧrelius et al. (2021) analyzed the experiences of fathers who were involved in the breastfeeding process during FCC care. They found that fathers who participated in breastfeeding courses felt responsible for breastfeeding and wanted to provide as much support as possible [41]. This means that both the mother’s role in supporting breastfeeding and the father’s role in increasing breastfeeding rates must be considered. Therefore, when developing educational content and planning policies for transitional care, it is important to expand the scope of the audience to parents and family members and organize content that reflects their characteristics.
In most of the articles we analyzed, transitional care interventions were carried out by nurses. The main content of transitional care includes general baby care, such as feeding and bathing, as well as monitoring the health statuses of unstable patients. The expertise of trained nurses is often highly emphasized for these aspects [8,11]. However, pre-term infants have broader nursing needs than just general medical care management, rehabilitation, and development. Therefore, multidisciplinary teams—encompassing medical, rehabilitation, and social work specialists—are necessary for successful transition care [5,36]. The expertise of midwives and nurses is also crucial. In South Korea, the transition period begins at the NICU discharge planning stage, but the system is still lacking. After discharge, parents need a lot of help in raising their children at home, but home visits are rarely available unless the medical condition is very serious. It is a system of periodic visits to the hospital to monitor the child’s health, which depends on the parents’ capacity. This situation causes a great deal of stress for parents and reduces their confidence as caregivers. Parents who have experienced transitional care in Korea feel that they do not receive enough medical and social support [12,13,22]. Rukeya’s (2013) systematic analysis of transitional care found that overseas, transitional care involving doctors, nurses, rehabilitation therapists, and dietitians had positive effects on attachment and increased breastfeeding rates [8]. Therefore, when developing educational content and planning policies for transitional care, it is recommended that the target audience be expanded to include fathers and other family members, and that the content be structured to reflect their characteristics.
The review found that the most important domain of intervention was parenting empowerments. It is comprised of the following key attributes: Growth & development, Developmental promotion, Nutrition, Safe environment, General parenting and Parent-infant interaction. Transitional care is developmentally supportive care, such as baby-friendly neonatal intensive care initiatives and kangaroo care, that is provided from the NICU to the home [22,28,30]. As the focus of transitional care shifts from healthcare providers to parents, it is important that parents’ parenting skills are enhanced. Parenting knowledge and skills (such as parenting knowledge, nutrition and environmental care to promote growth and development) are less culturally specific than emotional and social support. Therefore, there is an advantage in utilising international examples to provide evidence-based practice without trial and error. As it is characterised by the voluntary participation of parents, it is necessary to develop effective educational contents by referring to various overseas cases when developing a transitional care programme in Korea. (Comment 3---4번)
The emotional and social support domains strengthen the parental empowerment domain. Just as strong roots enable a healthy tree to thrive, adequate emotional and social support can strengthen parental empowerment (Figure 2). A key attribute of emotional support in transition care is counselling and advocacy, which refers to support from healthcare providers to help parents manage negative emotions such as anxiety, embarrassment, and lack of confidence. The practice of emotional support in transitional care identified in this review is consistently provided through ongoing visits and phone calls for 3-12 months after discharge [23,29,31,34]. In contrast, in Republic of Korea, emotional support provided by healthcare professionals is provided during intermittent hospital visits, and furthermore, parents have very limited opportunities to receive support by calling the hospital. Fortunately, the rapid development of the internet is alleviating these limitations. Therefore, the internet should be utilised to increase the opportunities for interaction between healthcare providers and parents to build an emotional support system.
Social support refers to community resources that can support parents in transitional care. The main attributes are community network and professional collaboration. As this is a highly culturally and socially influenced area, it is important to understand the context of healthcare networks in Republic of Korea. Although community healthcare support networks are well established in domestic, transitional care support systems comprised of multidisciplinary professionals are still lacking. Vohr et al. (2017) used a multidisciplinary team consisting of physicians, nurse practitioners, clinical social workers, and trained family resource specialists (FRS) to provide transitional care. In particular, FRSs are not medical professionals but are trained in transitional care and provide transitional care under the supervision and guidance of a social worker. This multidisciplinary team-based transitional care resulted in a significant reduction in the rehospitalization rate of infants [25]. Based on this, specific implementation policies should be developed in Korea, such as establishing multidisciplinary transitional care delivery teams and training FRS personnel. This cannot be done by small medical institutions or individuals, so public healthcare organizations should be involved.
Finally, this study has shown that the use of smartphones in transitional care interventions is increasing. The development of the internet and the global commercialisation of smartphones have had a significant impact on nursing interventions. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence programmes and smartphones, it is now possible to provide sufficient care to patients without the need for face-to-face human contact. This can play a very positive role in the formation of social networks for families with premature babies. For families who are often isolated from the outside society due to their child’s medical condition, a smartphone-based transitional care programme can help them overcome their social isolation. Therefore, various research activities should continue to be carried out to appropriately utilise the rapidly developing artificial intelligence and smartphone technologies to improve the quality of transitional care for families with premature babies.

6. Conclusions and Limitation

We conducted an integrative review to summarize the current literature on transitional care for parents caring for pre-term infants at home after discharge from the NICU. Three main domains of transitional care for parents of pre-term infants at home were identified. The first was parenting empowerment, which included attributes, such as growth and development, developmental promotion, nutrition, safe environment, general parenting, and parent-infant interaction. The secondary was emotional support, where counseling, advocacy, and community networks were identified as key attributes. The last domain was social support, which include the attributes of professional collaboration. These results were based on South Korean nursing practice. In light of these findings, policymakers and clinical practitioners involved in the development of transitional care policies for families of preterm infants should strive to build integrated transitional care programs that are appropriate for national contexts.
The strengths of this study include the extensive review of the literature to identify the key attributes of accurate transitional care, and the integration of the findings of high-quality literature through a systematic quality assessment process, which contributes to the reader’s understanding of transitional care. It also provides a direction for the establishment of transitional care in Republic of Korea and forms a basis for the development of programmes.
However, the selection of Korean and English-language literature limits the ability to identify the attributes of transitional care that reflect more diverse cultures. Therefore, future efforts should be made to gain insights into transitional care in Asian countries with similar cultural characteristics to Republic of Korea.

Author Contributions

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used “Conceptualization, J.S.K.; methodology, H.R.K., J.S.K; software, J.S.K; validation, S.H.L.,H.R.K. and J.S.K.; formal analysis, H.R.K.; investigation, J.S.K; resources & data curation, H.R.K., J.S.K; writing—original draft preparation, J.S.K.; writing—review and editing, H.R.K., J.S.K.; visualization, J.S.K.; supervision, H.R.K.; project administration, J.S.K.; funding acquisition, J.S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.” Please turn to the CRediT taxonomy for the term explanation. Authorship must be limited to those who have contributed substantially to the work reported.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (NRF-2022R1G1A1003915).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. These data are not publicly available owing to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Acknowledgments

We thanks to Seunghee Lee and Hyunjung Lee who participated in data selection, analysis, and validation of the study in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. preterm birth rate on 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth (accessed on 7 April 2024).
  2. Statistics Korea. Population Trend Survey: 2022 Birth Statistics. Available online: https://www.kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10301010000&bid=204&act=view&list_no=426806 (accessed on 30 October 2024).
  3. Kenner, C. Fetal Development: Environmental Influences and Critical Periods. Comprehensive Noenatal Nursing care, 6th ed.; Kenner, C., Altimier, L.B., Boykova, M.V., Eds.; Springer Publishing: New York, USA, 2019; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  4. Park, J.H.; Lee, H.; Cho, H. Analysis of the supportive care needs of the parents of preterm children in South Korea using big data text-mining: Topic modeling. Child Health Nurs Res 2021, 27, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Garti, I.; Donkor, E.; Musah, N.; Appiah, E.O.; Gyekye, S.; Menlah, A.; Akuoko, C.P. Mothers’ experiences of caring for preterm babies at home: qualitative insights from an urban setting in a middle-income country. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2021, 21, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Omweri, A.; Kimeto, P. Caregivers’ Experiences in Providing Home Care for Preterm Infants during the Initial Six Months Post-Discharge from the Neonatal Care Unit. Journal of clinical care and Medical advancement 2023, 1, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hua, W.; Zhou, J.; Wang, L.; Li, C. ; Zheng,Q.; Yuwen, W.; Jiang, L. It turned my life upside down’: Parents’ emotional experience of the transition with their preterm infant from birth to discharge Home—A qualitative study. Australian Critical Care 2023, 36, 679–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rukeya, M. Does transitional care improve neonatal and maternal health outcomes? A systematic review. British Journal of Midwifery 2013, 21, 634–646. [Google Scholar]
  9. Natalie, M.; Oluwaseun, I.; Candiss, A.; James, H.; Oliver, H. Effectiveness of Neonatal Early Supported Transfer To Home Interventions: Implications For Practice. The Practising Midwife 2023, 25, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oliver, H.; James, H.; Jennifer, K.; Richa, G.; Victoria, A.; George, G.; Gill, T.; Andrew, C. The effectiveness of neonatal early supported transfer to home interventions for parents and preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neonatal Nursing 2023, 29, 429–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Im, M.; Oh, J. Integrative Review on Caring Education Papers for Parents with a Premature. Infant Child Health Nurs Res, 2013, 19, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, J.S.; Kim, H.R. Perception and Educational needs of developmentally supportive care at-home for parents of preterm newborns. healthcare 2023, 11, 1700. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/12/1700.
  13. Lee, Y.R. A comparative study on the support policy for pre-maturity in some OECD countries. Health Soc Welf Rev 2016, 36, 63-96. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/landing/article.kci?arti_id=ART002187699.
  14. British association of perinatal Medicine. Neonatal Transitional care-a frame work for Practice. Available online: https://hubble-live-assets.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/bapm/file_asset/file/2472/TC_Framework-20.10.17x.pdf (accessed on 5 July 2024).
  15. Children with disabilities in Ontario: a profile of children’s services: factors affecting family-centered service delivery for children with disabilities. McMaster University, Hamilton. Available online: https://www.canchild.ca/system/tenon /assets/attachments/000/000/665/original/FCSPart3summaryforweb.pdf(accessed on 5 July 2024).
  16. Meleis, A.I. Transitions Theory: Middle-Range and Situation-Specific Theories in Nursing Research and Practice; Springer, New York, USA, 2010.
  17. Lasby, K.; Newton, S.; Von-Platen, A. Neonatal transitional care. Canadian Nurse 2004, 100, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. McKeon-Carter, R. Neonatal transitional care – a concept not a place. Infant 2018, 14, 98–102. [Google Scholar]
  19. Whittemore, R.; Knafl, K. The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2005, 52, 546–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Smith, V.; Devane, D.; Begley, C.M.; Clarke, M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Method 2011, 11, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hong, Q.N.; Pluye, P.; Fàbregues, S.; Bartlett, G.; Boardman, F.; Cargo, M.; Dagenais, P.; Gagnon, M.-P.; Griffiths, F.; Nicolau, B.; O’Cathain, A.; Rousseau, M.-C.; Vedel, I. Improving the content validity of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT): A modified e-Delphi study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2019, 111, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kim, Y.; Kim, H.; Lee, E.; Lee, J.; Lee, M. Effects of the Home Health Care Program on Maternal Anxiety and Confidence, Premature Infants Growth and Hospital Utilization, J Korean Soc Matern Child Health 2015, 19, 189-200.
  23. Casey, P.H.; Irby, C.; Withers, S.; Dorsey, S.; Li, J.; Rettiganti, M. Home Visiting and the Health of Preterm Infants. Clinical Pediatrics 2017, 56, 828–837. https://doi-org.libproxy.dankook.ac.kr/10.1177/0009922817715949.
  24. Poggioli, M.; Minichilli, F.; Bononi, T.; Meghi, P.; Andre, P.; Crecchi, A.; Rossi, B.; Carboncini, M.C.; Ottolini, A.; Bonfiglio, L. Effects of a Home-Based Family-Centred Early Habilitation Program on Neurobehavioural Outcomes of Very Preterm Born Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Neural Plast 2016, 4323792. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10. 1155. [Google Scholar]
  25. Vohr, B.; McGowan, E.; Keszler, L.; Alksninis, B.; O’Donnell, M.; Hawes, K.; Tucker, R..; O’Donnell, M. Impact of a transition home program on rehospitalization rates of preterm infants. Journal of Pediatrics, 2017, 181, 86–92. https://doi-org.libproxy.dankook.ac.kr/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.10.025.
  26. Wangruangsatid, R.; Srisuphan, W.; Picheansathian, W.; Yenbut, J. Effects of a transitional care program on premature infants and their mothers. Pacific Rim international journal of nursing research 2012, 16, 294–312. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gund, A.; Sjöqvist, B.A.; Wigert, H.; Hentz, E.; Lindecrantz, K.; Bry, K. A randomized controlled study about the use of eHealth in the home health care of premature infants. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013, 9, 13-22. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3583709/.
  28. Landsem, I.P.; Handegård, B.H.; Ulvund, S.E.; Kaaresen, P.I.; Rønning, J.A. Early intervention influences positively quality of life as reported by prematurely born children at age nine and their parents; a randomized clinical trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015, 22, 13-25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4343051/pdf/12955_2015_Article_221.pdf.
  29. Edraki, M.; Moravej, H.; Rambod, M. Effect of Home Visit Training Program on Growth and Development of Preterm Infants: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery 2015, 3, 12–22. [Google Scholar]
  30. Robinson, C.; Gund, A.; Sjöqvist, B.A.; Bry, K. Using telemedicine in the care of newborn infants after discharge from a neonatal intensive care unit reduced the need of hospital visits. Acta Paediatr 2016, 105, 902–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Garfield, C.F.; Lee, Y.S.; Kim, H.N.; Rutsohn, J.; Kahn, J.Y.; Mustanski, B.; Mohr, D.C. Supporting Parents of Premature Infants Transitioning from the NICU to Home: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of a Smartphone Application. Internet Interv 2016, 4, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Phagdol, T.; Nayak, B.S.; Lewis, L.E.; Bhat, Y.; Guddattu, V. Effectiveness of mHealth application in improving knowledge of mothers on preterm home care. Journal of Neonatal Nursing 2023, 29, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hägi-Pedersen, M.B.; Kronborg, H.; Norlyk, A. Knowledge of mothers and fathers’ experiences of the early in-home care of premature infants supported by video consultations with a neonatal nurse. BMC Nurs 2021, 20, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Haemmerli, N.S.; Stoffel, L.; Schmitt, K.U.; Khan, J.; Humpl, T.; Nelle, M.; Cignacco, E. Enhancing Parents’ Well-Being after Preterm Birth-A Qualitative Evaluation of the “Transition to Home” Model of Care. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022, 19, 4309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Breivold, K.; Hjaelmhult, E.; Sjöström-Strand, A.; Hallström, I.K. Mothers’ experiences after coming home from the hospital with a moderately to late preterm infant: a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci 2019, 33, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Committee on Hospital Care. Family-Centered Care and the Pediatrician’s Role. Pediatrics 2003, 112, 691–696. [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, E.S.; Cho, Y.A. The Effect of Fathers’ Kangaroo Care Experience of Preterm Babies on Paternal Attachment. Journal of Korean critical care nursing 2017, 10, 45–55. [Google Scholar]
  38. Park, J.E.; Lee, B.S. Experience of Becoming a Father of a high-risk Premature Infant. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2017, 47, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chung, S.H.; Yoon, S.A.; Chung, S.E. The Role of Fathers with First Child Born to a Premature Infant. Korean Academy of Basic Medicine & Health Science 2021, 14, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hemle Jerntorp, S.; Sivberg, B.; Lundqvist, P. Fathers’ lived experiences of caring for their preterm infant at the neonatal unit and in neonatal home care after the introduction of a parental support programme: a phenomenological study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2020, 35, 1143–1151, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.co. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mӧrelius, E.; Brogren, S.; Andersson, S.; Alehagen, S. Fathers’ experiences of feeding their extremely preterm infants in family-centred neonatal intensive care: a qualitative study. Int Breastfeed J 2021, 16, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the search and study selection process.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the search and study selection process.
Preprints 138406 g001
Figure 2. Main domain of transitional care.
Figure 2. Main domain of transitional care.
Preprints 138406 g002
Table 1. The population, intervention, outcome, and timeframe (PIOT) format adopted in this study.
Table 1. The population, intervention, outcome, and timeframe (PIOT) format adopted in this study.
P I O T
Families with a pre-term in their home Key components of a transitional program needed for families at home Health and well-being of both parents and pre-term infants Within 3 years poast-discharge from the NICU
Table 2. Quality appraisal of the included articles.
Table 2. Quality appraisal of the included articles.
Non-Randomized Studies Participants Measurement
Outcome
Outcome
Data
Design/Analysis
Accuracy
Intervention
as Intended
Kim et al. (2015) [22] Y Y Y Y Y
Casey et al. (2017) [23] Y Y Y Y Y
Poggioli et al. (2016) [24] Y Y Y Y Y
Vohr et al. (2017) [25] Y Y Y Y Y
Randomized Controlled Trials Randomization Comparable Group Outcome
Data
Blinding Adherence
Wangruangsatid et al. (2012) [26] Y Y Y C Y
Gund et al. (2013) [27] Y Y Y Y Y
Landsem et al. (2015) [28] Y Y Y Y Y
Edraki et al. (2015) [29] Y Y Y Y Y
Robinson et al. (2016) [30] Y Y Y Y Y
Garfield et al. (2016) [31] Y Y Y Y Y
Phagdol et al. (2022) [32] Y Y Y Y Y
Qualitative Studies Qualitative
Approach
Data
Collection
Adequacy of Results Interpretation of Results Coherence
of Methods
Breivold et al. (2019) [33] Y Y Y Y Y
Hägi-Pedersen et al. (2021) [34] Y Y Y Y Y
Haemmerli et al. (2022) [35] Y Y Y Y Y
Y: yes; N: no; C: can’t tell
Table 3. Analysis of the included articles (n=14).
Table 3. Analysis of the included articles (n=14).
Characteristics Categories n (%)
Publication year 2012–2015 5 (35.7)
2016–2019 6 (42.9)
2020–2022 3 (21.4)
Research design Quantitative Study
Quasi-experimental study 2 (14.2)
Randomized controlled trial 7 (50.2)
Cohort study 2 (14.2)
Qualitative study semi-structured interview
content analysis
Thematic analysis
3 (21.4)
2 (14.2)
1 (7.2)
Theoretical
frameworks
Applied 2 (14.2)
Not applied 12 (85.8)
Research subjects

Parents (mother, father) 5 (35.7)
Mother 5 (35.7)
Family (mother-infant, families) 4 (28.6)
Intervention provider
Nurse (e.g., neonatal, home healthcare, APN) 8 (57.2)
Multidisciplinary team 3 (21.4)
Other or unknown 3 (21.4)
Table 4. Analyses of the selected studies.
Table 4. Analyses of the selected studies.
Author
(year)
Research design Subjects
(N)
Program Key findings
Duration/
Methods
Provider Contents & Theory frame
Kim et al.
(2015)
Quasi-
Experimental
Mother
(exper. 21/
control 22)
1month/
home-visits,
telephonecounseling
Home healthcare nurse Preparing discharge
infant care (feeding, bathing, touching, infant assessment, use of medical device)
Effect on maternal anxiety and confidence in
role
Casey et al.
(2017)
Quasi-
experimental
Families
(exper. 234/
control 234)
12months/
home-visits
Nurse
social worker
Infant care (safe sleep, crying, medication administration, formula preparation, G&D, injury prevention)
social support (community services, follow-up schedule)
Effect on
infant mortality rate, rates of immunization and visits to clinic
Poggioli et al.
(2016)
Retrospectivecohort study parents
(exper. 61/
control 62
12months/
home-visits,
telephonecounseling
Physiotherapist,
Nursing staff,
Neurologist,
Neonatologist
In NICU: NIDCAP
After NICU: motor, relational, environmental, and transactional
interventions
Effect on
infant’s psychomotor, behavioral development
Vohr et al.
(2017)
Prospective cohort study Mother
(exper. 448/
control 356)
3months/
home-visits
Neonatal nurse practitioner,
Multidisciplinary team
Infant care (growth, feeding, and respiratory status)
Mother’s comfort, concerns, and understanding of the care plan
Effect on
rate of visits to clinic
Wangruangs-atid et al.
(2012)
Randomized controlled
trial
Mother
(exper. 40/
control 41)
1month/
home-visits,
telephone counseling
Unknown In NICU: NIDCAP
After NICU: assessing G&D, environmental care
Emergency care
*Theory frame: Experience transition theory
Effect on
parent’s perception and
knowledge of infant
Infant illness rate
Gund at al
(2013)
Randomized controlled
trial
Families
(exper. 12/
control 32/
compare 8)
3months/
web app.,
video call
Nurse Assessing G&D, nutrition,
parental coping with care in terms of communication and sharing
Effect on
parental satisfaction, use of ICTs
Landsem et al.
(2015)
Randomized controlled
trial
Mother-infant
(exper. 65/
control 62/
compare 59)
3months/
home-visits
Nurse Infant care (understanding of their child’s expressions, promoting sensitive, positive
practical transactions between parents and infants
Effect on
parents’ quality of life and anxiety, as well as infant physical health
Edraki et al.
(2015)
Randomized controlled
trial
parents
(exper. 30/
control 30)
6months
home-visits
Nurse Infant care (breastfeeding, nutrition, bathing, supplementary drugs)
parental counseling and support
Effect on
Infant’s development
Robinson et al.
(2016)
Randomized controlled
trial
mother-infant
(exper. 47/
control 42)
3weeks
web app,
video call
Neonatal nurses Infant care (sleep, nutrition, spitting-up, skin-to-skin care)
Infant assessment (general health, activity)
Effect on
parental satisfaction, rate of visits to clinics
Garfield et al.
(2016)
Randomized controlled
trial
Parents
(exper. 46/
control 44)
1month
smartphone app
Nurse Infant care (tracking activities of daily living)
Parental psychological support
Effect on
parenting competence in parents
Phagdol et al.
(2022)
Randomized controlled
trial
Mother
(exper. 75/
control 65)
12months
smartphone
app, YouTube
Healthcare provider Use of smartphone apps
Infant care (growth monitoring,
nutrition, hygiene practice),
Environmental management
Effect on
knowledge of care in parents (smartphone application is an efficient alternative to community-based care)
Hägi-Pedersen et al.
(2021)
Qualitative
study
Parents
(mother 6/
father 5)
1month
video counseling
Neonatal nurses Parental training and education Comfortable early in-home care, increased confidence concerning caring for family and managing social networks
Haemmerli et al.
(2022)
Qualitative
study
parents
(mother 20/
father 19)
6month
home-visiting,
call counseling
APN infant care (nutrition, physiotherapy), social support, counseling, partnership
*Theory frame: FCC
parent’s needs:
importance of continuity of care
professional collaboration
Breivold et al.
(2019)
Qualitative
study
mother
(10)
- - mother needs in home: creating a Safe Home Environment, professional support for family, economic support from the country
Table 5. Key attributes of transitional care for families with pre-term infants.
Table 5. Key attributes of transitional care for families with pre-term infants.
Categories Domain Key Attribute
Education Parenting empowerment Growth & development
Developmental promotion
Nutrition
Safe environment
General parenting
Parent-infant interaction
Partnership Emotional support
Counseling
Advocacy
Social support
Community network
Professional collaboration
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated