Preprint Article Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

The Drain Debate: A Prospective Controlled Trial on Criteria-Based Prophylactic Drain Use in Total Gastrectomy for Esophagogastric Junctional or Gastric Cancer (The DRAG Study)

Version 1 : Received: 5 November 2024 / Approved: 5 November 2024 / Online: 6 November 2024 (12:33:47 CET)

How to cite: Eleftheriou, M. M.; Doulberis, M.; Pouliakis, A.; Kareklas, D.; Toutouzas, K.; Zografos, G.; Theodorou, D.; Triantafyllou, T. The Drain Debate: A Prospective Controlled Trial on Criteria-Based Prophylactic Drain Use in Total Gastrectomy for Esophagogastric Junctional or Gastric Cancer (The DRAG Study). Preprints 2024, 2024110343. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202411.0343.v1 Eleftheriou, M. M.; Doulberis, M.; Pouliakis, A.; Kareklas, D.; Toutouzas, K.; Zografos, G.; Theodorou, D.; Triantafyllou, T. The Drain Debate: A Prospective Controlled Trial on Criteria-Based Prophylactic Drain Use in Total Gastrectomy for Esophagogastric Junctional or Gastric Cancer (The DRAG Study). Preprints 2024, 2024110343. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202411.0343.v1

Abstract

Background: Total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection is standard for resectable esophagogastric junctional and gastric cancer, but high morbidity challenges perioperative care. ERAS guidelines advise against routine drains, yet conflicting evidence leads to inconsistent practice. Methods: The DRAG (DRains After Gastrectomy) Trial is a prospective, non-randomized study conducted from February 2020 to March 2023 at the 1st Propaedeutic Surgery Department, Hippocration General Hospital, Athens. Patients undergoing open D2 total gastrectomy had perianastomotic drains placed based on newly established criteria, offering a more tailored approach. Immediate and short-term postoperative outcomes, including recovery milestones and complications, were assessed. Results: Sixty patients were included, with 40 receiving a drain. The non-drain group had significantly lower pain scores, earlier mobilization, less postoperative nausea and vomiting, and a shorter hospital stay. Among those with complications, significant differences in surgical site infections, delayed mobilization, extra-abdominal issues, length of stay, readmissions, and reoperations suggest that drain use may increase complications and hinder recovery. Conclusion: Our study suggests that routine prophylactic drain use can be avoided in gastrectomy for esophagogastric junctional and gastric cancer when experienced surgeons in high-volume centers follow clearly defined criteria. Implementing these criteria may improve patient outcomes and reduce complications

Keywords

prophylactic drain; total gastrectomy; gastric cancer; esophagogastric anastomosis leak; drain criteria

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Surgery

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.