Asbestos Evidence in Roman Buildings from Micia Archaeological Site (Romania)

1. Introduction

Historical-archaeological studies of different Roman edifices have been completed in recent years with new structural, compositional, and morphological investigations of stone, mortars, and different pigments, trying to identify the execution techniques, recipes, and resource location [1,2,3,4]. The huge interest in the characterization of the Roman building materials has raised the necessity for establishing the sampling criteria and defining effective archaeometric techniques for this. This approach not only enhances our understanding of the materials and methods used in Roman construction but also aids in the preservation and restoration efforts of archaeological sites, offering the ancient engineering practices and the cultural significance of these structure [5,6,7,8,9].

The Roman Empire remains in history one of the greatest military and economic power of Antiquity. The period of the empire coincides with a considerable expansion of the borders (the Mediterranean Sea becomes an inland sea for the Romans) and with an unmeasurable accumulation of wealth from the province-territories. The Roman constructions are of enormous dimensions, producing an imposing impression [10] .

Knowledge of building materials was partly facilitated by the expansion of the Roman Empire. For economic reasons, the ancient Romans tended to use locally available building materials (and cheap labor) whenever possible. The import and transport of building materials was limited to the bare necessities or high-value luxury items such as marble. The most used building materials by the Romans were wood, unburned brick, stone, and concrete, called concretum. Roman concrete was made from a mixture of sand, water, and pozzolanic ash. Walls with a core filled with a general mixture of mortar and rubble which include pieces of broken pottery were also used [11] .

When the Romans started to build farms on the Mureș Valley, around the year 120, they were very convinced that they would remain masters in Dacia forever. Although the military presence was massive in the area, to ensure that their wealth was safe, in case of a barbarian invasion, the Romans of Dacia surrounded their properties with strong defense walls [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] .

As the Roman dominions grew, so did their access to new local materials. The advancement of building material technologies was determined by events such as the great fire of Rome in July 64 AD. This is how fireproof stone for public buildings appeared. "Lapis Gabinus" was a particularly popular type of quarry volcanic rock, used as fire protection in many public structures. It came from quarries around the town of Gabii, which was near a nearby volcano area. This type of volcanic rock was full of intrusions, including basalt, which made it particularly resistant to fire. This is the point when asbestos has been accepted by the Romans [21,22] .

Micia, adorned with numerous monuments made of andesite stone mined in nearby quarries (Deva city area and Măgura Uroiului), was a flourishing settlement, defended by a strong fort, spread over seven hectares. The civil settlement (pagus) was inhabited by about 5,000 people, and over 1500 soldiers from several troops, were stationed in the Roman camp.

A series of inscriptions discovered especially on the bricks made by the soldiers give us clues that detachments of several troops would have been stationed in the castrum of Micia, including the vexilla of the XIII^th Gemina Legion, but the basic troops of this important fortification were: Cohors II Flavia Commagenorum, Ala I Hispanorum Campagonum and Numerus Maurorum Miciensium. [23] .

In its first phase, the castrum was fortified with a ditch and a wave of beaten earth, coming from the excavation of the ditch, was trapped in a reinforcement of beams that ended in the front with a palisade (Holzerdmauer). Behind the ground wave was the usual road, via sagularis, and inside the troops' barracks, stables, and command buildings (principia). The troops' barracks and stables were built with 0.30-0.40 m thick walls of wooden beams deepened in the ground up to 0.70-0.80 m. The walls of these buildings were covered with adobe, in which the traces of the twigs can still be seen [24] .

After the middle of the second century, this part of the Roman Empire went through a long and difficult war that led to the destruction and burning of many civilian settlements and military camps, including those at Micia.

After the restoration of the military situation in the years 170-175, the destroyed fortifications were rebuilt, including Micia. In this H-th phase of existence, the castrum was fortified with a 12 m wide and 5 m deep ditch and a 1.80 m thick and 6 m high, which plastered the wall technically called agger to the outside. The enclosure wall had the elevation built of large quadrilateral blocks of Uroiu augustite-andesite (opus quadratum), and the foundation, up to 0.80 m deep, of quarry stone (micasist) bound with mortar (opus incertum). The 10.50 m wide agger, including the ascent slope, was paved with a layer of gravel fastened with mortar. From place to place, the enclosure was provided with interior curtain towers, arranged in agger. The rounded cultes, with thickened masonry, also presenting a 0.50 m wide projection, had trapezoidal towers inside. The entrance was made through 4 gates, of which the one on the south side was dug [19].

Inside the Micia castrum there are some constructive interventions, made during the long period of use of the buildings, which do not seem to modify the general plan [20] .

Also towards the end of the 2^nd century AD, the civil settlement that accedes to the status of pagus is also rebuilt, having a well-organized building structure in residential areas, industrial areas, port, public baths (civilian and military), amphitheater, religious areas (temples) and enjoying the facilities of a city. In the extremities of Micia lay two necropolises with graves marked with spectacular funerary monuments made mostly of andesite.

Considering that only studies of geographical location for this monument are reported so far in the literature [25], without sufficient details related to the complete composition, structure and weathering status, such a study is required. In this regard, the present work will first address the composition of the samples taken from the Roman monuments identified in Micia fort and civil settlement area and will highlight for the first time for this Roman site the presence of a form of tremolite-asbestos.

The Romans extensively mined and utilized asbestos throughout Europe and the Mediterranean for its remarkable properties, including strength, insulation, and resistance to fire and corrosion. Asbestos found its way into various products, with the ancient Greeks weaving it into cloth, while Romans incorporated it into their building materials. Despite awareness of its detrimental health effects, as noted by historical figures like Strabo and Pliny, who documented the asbestos exposure, its applications persisted, highlighting a historical conflict between utility and safety that resonates even in contemporary discussions about the material [26,27,28].

Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral that was used for everything from building tiles to gloves. The Romans loved asbestos, using it in several different ways. The mineral fibers, whilst providing a material to weave into non-flammable cloth, are so small that they can easily become inhaled and trapped in the body. These trapped fibers can cause scarring, inflammation, and cancer. At the beginning, the Romans knew absolutely nothing about this. Asbestos, to the Romans, was simply a wonder material that could do wonderful things. The only downside was the price [28].

At that time, asbestos was brought from Orșova area, Ponicova (Cazanelor reservation) where on Ciucaru Mare hill, there is a recognized deposit of asbestos. In fact, the Mining Entreprise Orșova is famous for Feldspar, Mica, Asbestos, Talc, Dolomite and Quarts. Considering the composition detected by analytical techniques, asbestos and mica could be sourced from Orșova.

2. Description of the Archaeological Site

2.1. The Fort and the Ancient Settlement of Micia

Micia, the western most Roman settlement on the Mureş Valley, was an important center of the province of Dacia. The strategic location of the castrum here, about 2.5 km east of the Mureş Gorge, in the area where the river meadow widens generously, allowed the development of a large civil settlement in the vicinity of the fortification. The numerous road and industrial development works carried out in the last two centuries have affected the archaeological site to a great extent [29,30] .

Micia, one of the largest castra of the auxiliary troops of Roman Dacia, along with those of Porolissum and Tibiscum, was built on the south bank of the Mureş River, about 3 km east of the Brănisca gorge, the narrowest place in the valley of this river. Being at an obligatory crossing point of the communication route that connects the Transylvanian Plateau to the Tisa Plain, it played a first-hand strategic role in Dacia defense system. But it is also because of its position that it has suffered a series of destructions in modern times. Thus, its center is intersected by the Arad-Deva double railway and by the national road between the same localities, and one of the short sides of the enclosure, the SE one, was destroyed by the construction of a railway of the Mintia thermal power plant (Figure 1). However, the remaining parts: the northern half, a strip of the central area and a part of the southern half, still allow large-scale research of this archaeological objective [31] .

Micia is an archaeological site recently designated as a UNESCO Heritage site, located near Deva along the left side of the Mureș River. This site encompasses one of the largest Roman fors in Dacia, which played a crucial role in controlling access to the Mureș Valley (Figure 2). Established as a quasi-urban settlement, Micia features significant structures, including the fort, an amphitheater, a thermal complex, craftsmanship areas, sacred zones, and two known necropolises, all spanning approximately 25 hectares. The site is geographically framed by the Mureș River to the north and the foothills of the Poiana Ruscă Mountains to the south, extending into the administrative territories of the nearby villages of Vețel, Mintia, Herepeia, and Vulcez [32] .

The commune was connected to one of the main Roman roads that crossed the territory of Transylvania, but its most important role was that of defending the western borders of Roman Dacia, whose capital, the ancient city of Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa, was approximately at 50 kilometers, and the city of Apulum, at 80 kilometers away. Another strategic mission of Micia was to protect the gold and silver mines in the Apuseni Mountains.

Micia was inhabited between the 2^nd and 3^th centuries, the settlement being mostly destroyed since Antiquity, following the wars. Micia was not completely abandoned after the Aurelian retreat. Even if the Roman army and administration were taken from the area, the population remained in Micia, at least until the invasions of the Huns (5^th century), when all the Roman settlements were abandoned [33,34] .

The destruction of the Micia ruins continued in the 19^th century, when stone blocks from its walls were extracted by the locals to repair the Brănişca road, devastated by the waters of Mureș. In 1869, due to the construction of the Deva - Arad railway, the ancient town continued to degrade. In the same manner, the Mintia thermal power plant, built in the 1960s, negatively contributed to this deterioration process, while the Mureş River, whose course was diverted in 1967, submerged part of the ruins of Micia. The andesitic tuffs of Padurea Bejanului, Almaşul Sec and those south of the town of Deva (on the way to Almaşul Sec) have been identified in this area [35,36] . Also, over time, many pieces of andesite, the red colored rock, were extracted and used as construction materials.

The proximity of the Mureş River also played a crucial role in the settlement's development, providing resources and a means for trade and communication. Today, efforts continue to preserve these historical sites while balancing modern developments around them, ensuring that the rich history of this area is not forgotten in the face of industrialization and urban expansion.

This paper analyzes for the first time the presence of traces of tremolite-asbestos in the stone samples collected from Roman monument buildings extracted from quarries near the city of Deva and used in civil, military and funerary structures from Micia. Highly performant and sensitive analytical techniques have been used to put into evidence the tremolite-asbestos species, to identify the structure, composition and morphology of these minerals.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

For this study, 11 samples have been collected from the buildings belonging to the Micia archaeological site in Romania (Table 1).

3.2. Analytical Techniques

Wavelength dispersion X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (WDXRF) have been recorded by using the Rigaku ZSX Primus II spectrometer (Rigaku, The Woodlands, TX, USA), which includes a Rh anode X-ray tube and a 4.0 kW power source, including a 30 µm front Be window, to conduct detailed analyses. The utilization of an EZ scan method with Rigaku's SQX software helped for data processing, contributing to accurate and thorough spectroscopic results.

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis has been achieved by using a Rigaku Ultima IV diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), which used the following parameters: Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å), 40 kV and 200 mA. For the diffractograms, a 2θ range from 5° to 80°, and a scanning rate of 4°/min, have been followed.

Optical microscopy (OM) has been achieved with a Novex Microscope BBS trinocular microscope (Euromex Microscopen B.V., Arnhem, The Netherlands) at various magnifications, a digital video camera (Axiocam 105, Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany), ZenPro software for a real-time data acquisition, and with analysis conducted using ImageJ 1.50.

Also, for concise and detailed images, a Video-microscope Edmund Optics C-Mount, has been used, equipped with AmScope 3.2MP MT9T001 CMOS C-Mount camera, an extension videotub, ZOOM ring, focus ring, a Zabber T-NA08A25 XYZ Micro linear actuators with a Medium Intensity Spot/Coaxial Light, an Edmund Optics 2X EO M Plan Apo Long Working Distance Infinity Corrected objective and Edmund Optics XYZ Stage.

Additionally, stereomicroscopy was carried out with a Stereo trinocular stereomicroscope from EUROMEX Microscopen B.V., model 1903 EUROMEX Microscopen B.V., BD Arnhem, Netherlands), offering magnification capabilities from 5× to 40×.

Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM-FEI Quanta 200, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) was utilized to evaluate sample morphology, employing a high vacuum setup with a magnification ranging from 50× to 100,000×. For sample preparation, each specimen was coated with a 5 nm layer of gold using a Q150R-ES sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd., West Sussex, UK), to reduce charging effects and enhance conductivity during SEM imaging.

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) with attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was achieved with a resolution of 4 cm⁻¹ and accumulating 32 spectra, with measurements spanning the range of 4000–400 cm⁻¹ for a comprehensive analysis. The FTIR analysis was conducted in transmission mode using KBr pellets, which were prepared by thoroughly mixing the sample with potassium bromide (KBr) powder and then compressing the mixture into transparent discs.

Raman spectra were obtained with a Rigaku portable analyzer (Xantus-2, Rigaku, The Woodlands, TX, USA) with 785 and 1064 nm stabilized laser, a resolution of 4 cm⁻¹ using a laser power of 252 mW, and an Opus 7.0 software from Bruker Optics GmbH has been used for data processing.

The textural properties of the samples were investigated using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method, which involved analyzing nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms at a temperature of 77 K across a relative pressure range of 0.005 to 1.0. A NOVA2200e gas absorption analyzer from Quantachrome Instruments in Boynton Beach, FL, USA, was used. The samples were degassed for 4 hours at 180 °C under vacuum. Also, a NovaWin version 11.03 software was utilized for data processing.

Thermogravimetric analyses were performed using a Pyris 1 TGA/DTG analyzer from Perkin Elmer (TGA-7) in Waltham, MA, USA, on a temperature range of 50–800 °C heating rate of 10 °C/min and nitrogen flow at 50 mL/min.

The color of the mortars was analyzed Konica Minolta CR-410 spectrophotometer following the CieLab system (L*, a*, b*) [37] and the EN 15886 (2011) standard [38]. Measurements were performed under a standard D65 illuminant and a 2° observer angle. The data were processed using the Color Data Spectramagic NX CM-S100W software.

4. Results

4.1. Microscopic, Mineralogical and Compositional Analysis

All samples taken from the archaeological site are white to black in color, with a red area due to iron oxide samples. The black color may be due to andesite, as it is known that this area is a large deposit of andesite. The samples exhibit a sub rounded morphology and are predominantly siliceous, comprising monocrystalline quartz grains alongside fragments of volcanic rocks characterized by trachytic and vacuolar textures. Additionally, they contain trace amounts of heavy minerals of volcanic origin, such as augite and other pyroxenes, as well as black particles likely derived from andesite. The grain selection in these mortars is adequate, falling within the fine to medium sand size range of 0.125 to 0.5 mm. Their irregular, vacuolar appearance is attributed to fluids trapped during formation, with notable occurrences of tremolite-actinolite present. [39,40].

By analyzing the optical microscopy images, for the samples collected from the exterior layers, some asbestos species have been identified. Asbestos refers to a group of six naturally occurring mineral fibers, which are categorized into two main groups: the serpentine group, primarily represented by chrysotile, and the amphibole super-group, which includes asbestiform varieties of riebeckite, grunerite, anthophyllite, tremolite, and actinolite. These fibers are known for their heat resistance and fibrous nature, making them useful in various industrial applications, although their health risks are well-documented due to their potential to cause serious respiratory diseases when inhaled. [41]. Actinolite is an intermediate member of a series between magnesium-rich tremolite, Ca₂(Mg_5.0-4.5Fe²⁺_0.0-0.5)Si₈O₂₂(OH)₂, and iron-rich ferro-actinolite, Ca₂(Mg_2.5-0.0Fe²⁺_2.5-5.0)Si₈O₂₂(OH)₂. Mg and Fe ions can be freely exchanged in the crystal structure.

Tremolite and actinolite are closely related minerals that form a continuous series characterized by their chemical compositions, where the tremolite is richer in magnesium and actinolite in iron. Both minerals exhibit similar physical properties, including various recognized varieties that can be fibrous and leathery, featuring a silky luster and interlocking fibers that are dense and often indistinguishable. While both minerals contain asbestos forms with movable and elastic fibers, tremolite asbestos is far more prevalent than the less common actinolite asbestos.

Asbestos was widely utilized by ancient civilizations, particularly the Romans and Greeks, for its remarkable properties, such as strength, insulation, and resistance to fire and corrosion. The Romans mined asbestos throughout Europe and the Mediterranean, incorporating it into various products, including building materials. Meanwhile, the Greeks notably used asbestos fibers in textiles, showcasing its versatility and widespread appeal during that period.

One of the first mention about the asbestos dated from the 1^st century AD historian Pliny the Elder, when he noted "it is quite indestructible by fire" and "affords protection against all spells, especially those of the Magi." In our experiments has not identified only linear crystals, but also, flexible one, are represented, too. Some asbestoid structures have been identified in Diana and Venus altars, most probably due to the reconstruction after the fire of these religious settlements. The religious cult is another supposition.

Also, for these samples, three material layers have been identified: inferior(white-black), middle (red, black), exterior layers (whitish), as could be visualize by optical microscopy, Figure 3.

The separation of the three layers can be much more clearly highlighted by using and processing the optical microscopy image (Figure 3(b), by the Image J soft (Figure 3(c)).

In our opinion, and based on the literature data, the middle layer could be a mixture of andesite with asbestos, while the exterior layer could be assigned to tremolite-asbestos presence in the reconstruction mortars. All the subsequent investigation results will convince on the existence of this layer of asbestos applied by the Romanian population for the fire protection of the respective constructions.

Andesite is a type of dark color volcanic with a fine-grained texture, primarily composed of zoned sodic plagioclase along with additional minerals such as biotite, hornblende, and pyroxene in minor proportions. Its ground mass typically contains a mix of sodic plagioclase and small amounts of quartz, and it is mainly formed from the lava that cools relatively quickly upon eruption, resulting in its distinct characteristics.

In order to be sure about the identity of these asbestos forms in Roman Monuments, a comparison between the roman monuments building materials with those from the Carriers’ fronts samples, as could be seen in optical microscopy images, Figure 4.

If in the samples from the Carriers’ fronts an andesite and various minerals based on iron oxides together with quartz predominates, in the samples from the Roman monuments, all these minerals are found in much smaller quantities, the tremolite-type asbestoid forms being present on large scale. Some zones contain some aggregates (up to 2 mm), and ferruginous and fine sand-sized quartz grains (0.125–0.25 mm) (Figure. 4). Also, some volcanic rock fragments with vacuolar texture and some Na-Ca and K-Na plagioclase, with black particles, are identified (Figure. 4) [42].

4.2. Microscopy Evidence of Tremolite-Asbestos Fibers

Visual and optical microscopic examination of the investigated samples, can easily put into evidence the presence of long fibers, translucide and flexible, as could be observed in Figure 5b-e. Also, the identification of these fibers is more feasible from the SEM images (Figure 5f,g), which confirm the heterogeneity of these samples, as previously with OM (Figure 5b-e). The asbestos fibers are randomly oriented both as individual threads and as fiber bundles, which denotes the heterogeneous mixing of these fibers in the prepared mortar. Asbestos fibers are extremely fine, typically ranging in diameter from 100 nanometers to 1 micrometer, with lengths that can extend to several centimeters.

These samples predominantly consist of tremolite, characterized by elongated prismatic and fibrous crystal, as revealed through electron and optical microscopy. The tremolite asbestos could displays a table structure, which indicates subsequent kinking and folding that occurred after its initial crystallization, highlighting a complex history of polyphasic deformation. Similar images have been reported in Rianudo paper [43,44] .

XRD/WDXRF

In the same manner, tremolite mineral has been identified by XRD techniques, Figure 6. In this figure, the collected samples have been analyzed, and tremolite, anorthite, cristobalite, quartz and berlinite were put into evidence.

XRD analysis indicates that the mineral paragenesis in the matrix of these samples consists primarily of tremolite, albite, and anorthite, suggesting a complex interplay of these minerals within the geological context.

In the case of the fragments with volcanic source, the chemical composition of the matrix identified by EDXRF (Figure 7) reveals variable amounts of CaO (7-9 %), SiO₂ (56-62 %), Al₂O₃ (20–23 %), FeO (4–7 %), K₂O (1–4 %), MgO (1–2 %), TiO₂ (1–1.5 %) and Na₂O (4–7 %). These results could be observed to be quite similar for the all the analyzed samples. Major element analyses allowed classifying the amphibole from sample as tremolite according to Hawthorne et al [41]. Tremolite as a member of the amphibole group, is characterized by its specific chemical composition and structure, primarily consisting of calcium, magnesium, and iron in a silicate framework.

FTIR

In order to certify the presence of asbestos in this area, the carriers’front samples have beenanalysed by XRD, and no specific bands for asbestos have been found (Figure 8a). However, the samples collected from Roman buildings (20,23,28) show the specific bands of asbestos (Figure 8b). As literature indicated, asbestos forms as asbestos-tremolite has a specific band around 1400 cm-¹, Figure 8c.

Figure 8 show representative FTIR ATR spectra collected on powdered fragments of the investigated samples. For some samples (ex. P20, P23 or P28) was possible to observe three layers: exterior, middle and interior distinctly layers. The specific bands, as Si-O stretching and bending modes at ~960, 1015, 1080 and 1400 cm^-1) and 620 cm^-1 (Figure 8), are characteristic of asbestos and similar amphiboles and pyroxenes compounds [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52] .

Tremolite is a mineral that primarily consists of calcium, magnesium, and silicon, closely aligning with its ideal end-member composition. However, it can incorporate varying amounts of magnesium through substitutions for calcium, and it typically contains trace elements such as sodium, potassium, iron, aluminum, and fluorine. This variability in composition reflects its natural occurrence and the ability of minerals to accommodate different ions in their crystal structures [51]. This variability in composition arises from the inherent flexibility of the structural framework formed by silica ribbons in the fibers, which can incorporate various ions from the surrounding environment, including those contributed by the diverse characteristics of the host rocks. This ability to accommodate different ions leads to diverse compositional outcomes, reflecting the interplay between the structural capacity of the material and the geochemical context in which it forms [52,53,54].

Raman spectra

Raman spectroscopy effectively identifies and differentiates minerals within the amphibole group, but the peak assignment can be challenging due to the complex structural variations among them, leading to inconsistencies in peak/vibration assignments across different studies.

By using 782 nm laser for Raman equipment, it was possible to put into evidence the main bands of asbestos (1000-2000 cm^-1). The band from 1400 cm^-1 is predominant in all the investigated selected samples (20,23,28), especially for middle and exterior layers. The most distinct Raman peak, Figure 9, is between 1200 - 1400 cm^-1, which is assigned to the symmetric stretching vibrations of the Si-O-Si bridges [55,56].

The obtained Raman spectrum of tremolite - actinolite (Figure 9) is characterized by the typical features of the spectra of amphibole minerals [57,58]: between 300 and 600 cm⁻¹ (Mg–OH and Fe–OH vibrations, Si–O–Si bending motions and OH– vibrations); between 650 and 750 cm⁻¹ (Si–O–Si symmetric stretching); over 750 cm⁻¹ (O–Si–O symmetric stretching and the O–Si–O and Si–O–Si asymmetric stretching bands). The main feature of the Raman spectra in the low-wavenumber region, at nearly 675 cm⁻¹, is the Si–O–Si symmetrical stretching with A_g symmetry. This mode, when substituting Mg²⁺ with the heavier Fe²⁺, downshifts from 675 cm⁻¹ in pure tremolite to 667 cm⁻¹ in Fe-rich actinolite [59].

In the investigated representative samples (P20, P23 and P28), the bands from 1290, 1350 and 1400 cm^-1 are specific for middle layer of each of them. Well deconvoluted, the band from 1400 cm^-1, specific for asbestos, could be clearly identified, this band belonging to tremolite. The other bands (1290 and 1350 cm^-1) could be assigned to the other minerals, amphiboles and pyroxenes compounds, confirming the FTIR results.

4.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis

Temperature ranges (Table 2) were selected as a function of the major thermal reactions suffered by mortars during the heating: loss of adsorbed water (<120°C), dehydration of salts as well as loss of zeolitic water and/or other hygroscopic compounds (120-200°C), loss of structural water from hydraulic compounds like phyllosilicates, C-S-H and/or C-A-H (200-600°C), release of CO₂ by decomposition of calcium carbonate (600-850°C), and other phenomena (>850°C) as decomposition of sulphates and/or loss of residual water and carbon dioxide [60]. These thermal reactions were clearly recorded in TGA/DTA curves and confirmed by FTIR. However, in these mortars, the dehydratation and decomposition of hydrated sulphates also occurred, as showed in figure 10. A double peak of CO2 emission likely due to the presence of Mg-bearing carbonates is also reported [61,62,63]. Results of the thermogravimetric and thermodifferential analyses (TGA-DTA) of the investigated samples showed six main thermal process: the first, at less than 100 °C, is due to the loss of weakly adsorbed water [64]. The bands around 550, 700 and 770 °C denote the release of bound water and are related to the dehydroxylation of minerals from serpentine subgroup species [65,66].

All the studied samples from this site are a sort of mortars and have hydraulic properties, with a CO₂/H₂O ratio quite low [67], indicating an slightly hydraulicity in majority. A possible cause could be the low concentration of lime, responsible for CO₂ releases.

The most important thermal effects for a correct hydraulic classification are the weight loss of Structural Bound Water (200–600 ^OC), and decomposition of calcite and other carbonates (600–850 ^OC) with a consequent release of CO₂.

In the DTA curves (Figure 10), these samples exhibits peaks attributed to decomposition of the carbonates, also, due to the presence of organic substances, indicating pozzolanic activity [68]. All the analyzed amphiboles could be assigned to calcic or sodic-calcic amphiboles with a tremolitic composition, reflecting medium-low pressure and low to medium temperature metamorphic conditions [69].

4.4. Chemical Analysis

The chemical composition of the the samples analyzed by X-ray fluorescence techniques also shows the details of the types of mortars (middle layers) and their uses at the other materials present in this archaeological site [70]. The samples have a low CaO content, which shows a close relationship between the CaO content and SiO₂ + Fe₂O₃ + Al₂O_3, content, usually due both to their aggregates (volcanic aggregates). These samples also contain a higher percentage of K₂O (4.78 ± 0.66 %), this content being slightly lower in the coating mortar – external layer (1.83 ± 0.05 %).

The carbonation process influences the microstructure of mortar by leading to alterations in its pore structure and density, which in turn affects the setting and hardening of the render. As carbon dioxide from the environment reacts with calcium hydroxide in the mortar, it forms calcium carbonate, impacting the overall strength and durability of the render through changes in moisture permeability and bond strength. [71].

Also, K₂O and Na₂O have an important role in Roman mortars. Alvarez et al. [72] reported that the addition of alkali as Na₂O and K₂O, led to a higher durability and turning them into suitable repair materials for the built heritage. The highest K₂O concentration, the lowest Surface area value and the highest Na₂O concentration, the highest Surface area value.

The reduced concentrations of K2O and Na2O in ancient Roman mortars lead to lower water absorption through capillarity, which enhances their durability against freezing and thawing cycles. These materials used in the middle layer could be considered as mortars and they exhibit textural properties characterized by the presence of small-diameter mesopores (2–5 nm), significantly smaller than those found in modern hydraulic mortars, which may contribute to their unique water adsorption characteristics and overall mechanical properties, resulting in higher durability and resistance.[73].

5. Conclusions

Recognized as an important archaeological civil settlement, the Dacian Roman Micia site, is very reach in residential areas, industrial areas, port, public baths (civilian and military), amphitheater, religious areas (temples) and enjoying the facilities of a city. Even inside the Micia location, there were some constructive interventions, made during the long period of use of the buildings, it is important to identify for the first time in this part of Roman Dacia the presence of asbestos species, and the presence of a form of tremolite-asbestos, especially. Highly performant and sensitive analytical techniques have been used to put into evidence the tremolite-asbestos species, to identify the structure, composition and morphology of these minerals inside of the building materials from Roman monuments, as follows: optical, stereo and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence with wavelength dispersion (EDXRF), FTIR and Raman spectroscopy, thermal analysis (TGA/DTA). It is presumed that asbestos species has been used after the fire from Micia settlement in order to protect these monuments.

Visual, optical, stereo and scanning electron microscopic examination of the investigated samples put into evidence the presence of long fibers, translucid and flexible, elongated prismatic and fibrous crystal, a wavy structure, belonging to tremolite-asbestos. This species has been identified by XRD, XRF, FTIR (by the bands from 1400 cm^-1), Raman (1000-2000 cm^-1).

Asbestoid formations of the tremolite type were identified during the reconstruction period, it was necessary to use a fireproof layer for the projection of the walls and especially of the religious constructions. With a significant concentration of K₂O and Na₂O, the slightly hydraulic mortars identified with an increased durability. The highest K₂O concentration, the lowest Surface area value and the highest Na₂O concentration, the highest Surface area value.

The materials (repairing mortars) analyzed at Micia exhibit characteristics consistent with those observed at various Roman sites throughout the Mediterranean, indicating a sustained adherence to the mortar production methods outlined by Vitruvius. This continuity in technique underscores the influence of classical architectural principles on Roman construction practices across the region.