Submitted:
20 December 2024
Posted:
23 December 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
Design and Method
Sources of information and search methodology
Examine the requirements for eligibility and selection
| No | Title and Author | Method | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Health literacy, self-efficacy, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in Thai communities (Ong-Artborirak et al., 2023) | D : Cross-sectional. S : The study consisted of 414 older adults aged 60 years and above who had been diagnosed with T2DM. Participants were selected through simple random sampling from the list of patients registered in the Java Health Center Information System (JHCIS) program in Phayao Province. V : Depended variables: glycemia control (fasting blood glucose and HbA1c), BMI, SBP & DBP, and eGFR. Independent Variables: Health Literacy, Self-Efficacy, Self-Care Behaviors I : The questionnaire consisted of: General characteristics of participants; Health literacy, which included six health-related skill areas; Self-efficacy for diabetes prevention; Self-care behaviors related to diabetes prevention, which included questions on food consumption, exercise, stress management, and medication behaviors. A : Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and Simple Linear Regression. |
The results of this study provide important insights into factors affecting diabetes control and emphasize the need for a more holistic approach in diabetes management, including improved health literacy and support for self-care behaviors. Patients with better health literacy tend to have lower HbA1c levels, indicating better glycemic control. |
| 2 | The effect of training to diabetes patients according to planned behavior theory on self-efficacy and patient empowerment: A randomized study (Göger, Şener and Ci̇ngi̇l, 2024) | D : experimental design with active control, pre-test-post-test, and single-blind. Participants were randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group. S : consisted of 92 participants, of which 45 people were in the intervention group and 47 people in the control group. Participants involved were individuals with type 2 diabetes who were aged 40 years and above, had been diagnosed at least one year previously, and met the inclusion criteria. V : Independent variable: Training based on Theory Planned Behavior (TBP). Independent Variables: self-efficacy, patient empowerment, and HbA1c levels I : The questionnaires consisted of: Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSS); Patient Empowerment Scale (PES); HbA1c. A : Chi-square test and t/Wilcoxon test for within-group comparisons, and t/Mann Whitney test for between-group comparisons. |
The training provided based on the theory of planned behavior contributed positively to diabetes disease management, improving self-efficacy and patient empowerment, although it did not have a significant impact on HbA1c levels within the specified observation period. |
| 3 | Effects of an educational program on self-efficacy towards type 1 diabetes mellitus disease among parents and adolescents in Jordan (Al-Shorman et al., 2023) | D : Quasi-experimental with a one-group pre-test-post-test approach. S : consisted of 44 participants, comprising 29 parents of young children and 15 adolescents with type 1 diabetes. V : The main variable measured in this study was parents' and adolescents' self-efficacy in managing type 1 diabetes. This variable was measured before and after the education program to assess the effectiveness of the intervention. I : DMT1 Parents' and Adolescents' Self-Efficacy Scale, which consists of 21 items with a five-point Likert scale (1 = “not at all capable” to 5 = “very capable”). The instrument was developed by the researcher with the collaboration of a diabetes health educator and has undergone a validation process. A : T-test for paired samples |
Overall, the results of this study support the importance of diabetes education in improving the self-efficacy and knowledge of parents and adolescents living with type 1 diabetes. These results suggest that a structured diabetes education program effectively improves participants' ability to manage type 1 diabetes, including in terms of understanding blood glucose targets, insulin types, and other diabetes management practices. |
| 4 | Diabetes Self-Efficacy on Glycemic Control and Well-Being of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study (Aseela et al., 2024) | D : Cross-sectional analytic. S : The study consisted of 400 adult patients with T2DM who had been diagnosed for more than one year. The sampling technique used was consecutive sampling, and participants with a history of depression were excluded from the study. V : Self-Efficacy, Glycemic Control dan Well-Being of Patients I : Stanford Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES), and the WHO-5 Well-Being Index Scale. A : Chi-Square Test and Pearson Correlation |
The results of this study show that high self-efficacy is associated with better glycemic control and higher well-being, and identify factors that can improve self-efficacy in patients with T2DM. |
| 5 | The mediating role of diabetes stigma and self-efficacy in relieving diabetes distress among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter cross-sectional study (Xing et al., 2023) | D : Multicenter cross-sectional study. S : The study involved collecting data from 431 patients with type 2 diabetes drawn from several medical centers. V : Social Support, Diabates Stigma, Self Efficacy, and Diabetes Distress I : Perceived Social Support Scale to measure social support; Type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale to assess diabetes stigma; Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale to measure self-efficacy in diabetes management; Diabetes Distress Scale to assess the level of diabetes-related stress. A : Pearson Correlation and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) |
The model tested using structural equation modeling showed a good fit, with indicators meeting the established criteria (e.g., chi-square, NFI, GFI, and RMSEA), indicating that the proposed hypothesized model can explain the relationship between the variables well. The results of this study provide important insights for the development of interventions that can increase social support and reduce diabetes stigma, as well as improve patients' self-efficacy, which may ultimately reduce diabetes-related stress. |
| 6 |
The Effect of Web-based Diabetes Education on the Metabolic Control, Self-efficacy and Quality of Life of Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Turkey (Ayar et al., 2021) |
D : pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental approach. S : Teenagers between the ages of 11 and 18 who were registered at the paediatric endocrinology polyclinic of a university hospital in western Turkey and had a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes were included in the study. Thirty of the 62 teenagers that took part were in the intervention group, while thirty-two were in the control group. V : Independent variable: type of education (web-based education and standard care). Dependent variable: self efficacy, quality of life, and A1C levels I : Self-Efficacy Scale, Quality of Life (QOL) Inventory, and A1C Measurement A : To compare the mean A1C, quality of life, and self-efficacy levels over time between the intervention and control groups, the study used analysis of variance (ANOVA). This analysis assisted in assessing the web-based education program's efficacy. |
Although it had no discernible effect on A1C levels, the study found that web-based diabetes education is a useful tool for improving quality of life and self-efficacy in teenagers with type 1 diabetes. The results confirm the need for more easily available online learning materials for teenagers with diabetes. When compared to teenagers in the control group, who received standard care, the self-efficacy levels of the intervention group, who received web-based teaching, increased dramatically. This implies that teenagers with type 1 diabetes benefit greatly from web-based education in terms of improving their self-management practices. |
Results And Discussion
- Diabetes Health Literacy
- 2.
- Training According to Planned Behavior Theory
- 3.
- Web-Based Diabetes Education
Conclusion
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alam, S.; Hasan, M.K.; Neaz, S.; Hussain, N.; Hossain, M.F.; Rahman, T. Diabetes Mellitus: insights from epidemiology, biochemistry, risk factors, diagnosis, complications and comprehensive management. Diabetology 2021, 2, 36–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Shorman NA, D.; Atiyeh, H.; Kassab, M.; Al-Rjoub, S.F. Effects of an educational program on self-efficacy towards type 1 diabetes mellitus disease among parents and adolescents in Jordan. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 2023, 71, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ayar, D. , Öztürk, C., & Grey, M. (2021). The effect of web-based diabetes education on the metabolic control, self-efficacy and quality of life of adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Turkey.
- Aseela, S.; Santhi, S.; Anish, T.S.; Mahadevan, S. Diabetes Self-Efficacy on Glycemic Control and Well-Being of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus 2024, 16, e64005. [Google Scholar]
- Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1997, 50, 248–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budreviciute, A.; Damiati, S.; Sabir, D.K.; Onder, K.; Schuller-Goetzburg, P.; Plakys, G.; Kodzius, R. Management and prevention strategies for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their risk factors. Frontiers in public health 2020, 8, 574111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farmer, H. , Xu, H., & Dupre, M. E. (2022). Self-efficacy. In Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging (pp. 4410–4413). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Göger, S.; Şener, Ş.; Ci̇ngi̇l, D. The effect of training to diabetes patients according to planned behavior theory on self-efficacy and patient empowerment: A randomized study. Primary Care Diabetes 2024, 18, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hattie, J.; Hodis, F.A.; Kang, S.H. Theories of motivation: Integration and ways forward. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2020, 61, 101865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 10th ed. Boyko EJ, Magliano DJ, Karuranga S, Piemonte L, Saeedi PRP, Sun H, editors. 2021. Available from: www.diabetesatlas.org.
- Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. DITJEN P2P (Direktorat Jendral Pencegahan dan Pengendalian Penyakit) Laporan Kinerja Semester 1 Tahun 2023. 2023.
- Ong-Artborirak, P.; Seangpraw, K.; Boonyathee, S.; Auttama, N.; Winaiprasert, P. Health literacy, self-efficacy, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in Thai communities. BMC geriatrics 2023, 23, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- PERKENI (2021) Konsensus Pengelolaan dan Pencegahan Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 di Indonesia 2015. PB. Perkeni.
- Rosli, N.A.; Mazapuspavina, M.Y.; Ismail, Z.; Elkudssiah Ismail, N. Relationship of Self Efficacy in Medication understanding with Quality of Life among Elderly with type 2 diabetes Mellitus on Polypharmacy in Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, 19, 3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Subandi, M.A.; Praptomojati, A.; Marchira, C.R.; DelVecchio Good, M.J.; Good, B.J. Cultural explanations of psychotic illness and care-seeking of family caregivers in Java, Indonesia. Transcultural Psychiatry 2021, 58, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xing, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, B.; Jiang, X. The mediating role of diabetes stigma and self-efficacy in relieving diabetes distress among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Psychology 2023, 14, 1147101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
