Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Differential Expression of miR-223-3p and miR-26-5p According to Different Stages of Mastitis in Dairy Cow

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Submitted:

13 January 2025

Posted:

14 January 2025

You are already at the latest version

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Abstract

Mastitis is the disease that causes the greatest economic losses in dairy farming, significantly im-pairing animal welfare and the quality and quantity of milk produced. MicroRNAs are increasingly gaining attention, both in human and veterinary medicine, as biomarkers for various diseases. This study evaluated the diagnostic potential of four circulating microRNAs (miR-26-5p, miR-142-5p, miR-146a, and miR-223-3p) by examining changes in their expression in milk samples from dairy cows at different immune cells subpopulations correlated to different stage of mastitis in validated method. Additionally, the project has analysed the possible source of these circulating microRNA by the measurement of their secretion from activated immune cells (lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils). miR-223-3p has been significantly expressed in acute stage of mastitis (p<0.01) but not in chronic or susceptible stages. mir-26-5p has been significantly reduced in acute, chronic and susceptible groups of animals. In immune cell cultures miR-26 has been shown to downregulate in LPS-stimulated neutrophils while miR-223 has been shown to be upregulated in PHA-stimulated lymphocytes. The differential expression of miR-223-3p and miR-26-5p together with differential and classic somatic cell count could be utilized for identifying the evolutionary stage of masti-tis-related inflammatory pathology.

Keywords: 
mastitis
;  
dairy cows
;  
biomarkers
;  
differential somatic cell count
;  
miR-223
;  
miR-26
Subject: 
Biology and Life Sciences  -   Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Zoology

1. Introduction

Mastitis is a disease that causes significant decrease of cows welfare and economic losses to dairy herds, both in terms of milk losses and treatment costs [1,2]. Indeed, mastitis leads to a reduction in milk production and quality, and it is one of the primary reasons for the antimicrobial treatments use in the dairy industry [2,3]. Therefore, both due to issues related to antibiotic resistance and to reduce the treatment costs impact, early diagnosis of mastitis in dairy cows, both in clinical and subclinical forms, is becoming increasingly relevant.
Mastitis is classified as clinical or subclinical and the diagnosis is mainly based on direct or indirect somatic cell count (SCC), despite it has a lower accuracy than microbiological analysis. Currently, the recognized SCC threshold for a clinical mastitis diagnosis is 4x105 cells/mL of milk, while the reference threshold for subclinical mastitis is 2x105 cells/mL [4,5]. SCC has always been an excellent indicator of the bovine udder health status, but its accuracy is declining; indeed, it has been observed that mammary gland inflammation can be even with an SCC lower than 1x105 cells/mL [6]. An alternative widely used in the field is the California Mastitis Test (CMT), which, however, has inherent limitations due to the subjectivity of the operator performing the test.
Somatic cells consist of epithelial and immune cells present in varying proportions depending on different physiological factors, such as the cow lactation stage, or pathological factors, such as inflammatory states. Recently, a new factor has been identified that allows for better characterization of the potential inflammatory state of the udder: the differential somatic cell count (DSCC). This method is not only quantitative but also qualitative, as it allows for the determination of the percentage of immune cells, specifically lymphocytes and neutrophils, and the recognized threshold that allows discrimination between a healthy cow and one affected by mastitis is 68.5% [3,6,7,8]. Lymphocytes regulate the initiation and suppression of the immune response in case of infection, circulating monocytes play a crucial role in innate immunity and become resident macrophages upon migration into tissues, type 1 macrophages (M1) perform a pro-inflammatory action by releasing inflammatory mediators (such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α), and type 2 macrophages (M2) possess phagocytic activity to eliminate pathogens and cellular debris [9,10,11]. Additionally, macrophages recognize pathogens and rapidly recruit neutrophils to the site of infection [10]. Neutrophils also have high phagocytic activity and release enzymes capable of killing pathogens [12].
In the healthy cows milk, somatic cells are primarily represented by lymphocytes (75%), with lower quantities of monocytes/macrophages (18%), neutrophils (5%), and epithelial cells (2%). However, this composition changes significantly in cases of clinical or subclinical mastitis. The clinical mastitis cows milk shows a significant increase in neutrophils (55%) and monocytes/macrophages (36%) and a drastic reduction in lymphocytes (6%). The milk of subclinical mastitis cows confirms this trend, with a further increase in neutrophils (65%) and a reduction in lymphocytes (3%), but in this case, the monocytes/macrophages increase is lower (28%) [3,10,13]. DSCC is a valid factor that, when associated with SCC, improves its accuracy. However, detecting the described changes in the composition of somatic cells in milk shows a certain delay compared to the onset of infection [3]. Therefore, it is necessary to identify new methods that allow for early diagnosis of mastitis, both in its clinical and subclinical forms.
MicroRNA (miRNA) are non-coding RNA molecules approximately 20-22 nucleotides long that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level [14]. miRNAs can be released from cells in response to both physiological and pathological stimuli into body fluids, including milk, and in this context, they are referred to as circulating miRNAs (c-miRNAs). Interestingly, these c-miRNAs in milk show high resistance to multiple freeze-thaw cycles and the action of RNases [15]. This high stability makes them excellent molecules to work with. Additionally, several miRNAs have been associated with inflammatory processes, and some have shown alterations in their expression related to mastitis in dairy cows, making them interesting candidates as diagnostic biomarkers [16,17,18,19].
This study wants to evaluate the alterations in the expression of a set of four c-miRNAs, previously associated with bovine mastitis (miR-26a-5p, miR-142-5p, miR-146a, and miR-223-3p) [20], in milk samples in relation to the inflammatory state of the mammary gland of dairy cows, in order to assess their potential as biomarkers for early diagnosis of mastitis and aims to investigate the relationship between their secretion and the release of specific immune cells release in milk.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Statement

All the dairy cows involved in this study were reared in commercial private farms and were not subjected to any invasive procedures. Milk samples used for the analyses were collected during routine milking. All milk samples were collected and analysed according to the guidelines for dairy cattle milk recording and analysis [21].

2.2. Milk Samples

Milk samples utilized for this study belong to 72 Italian Brown Swiss dairy cows (5.1 ± 1.6 years old) screened for SCC and DSCC composition. Briefly, milk samples were divided for neutrophils and lymphocytes composition and clinical status of mammary gland according to the status of mammary inflammation. Two litres of milk per cow were sampled from the evening milking sessions between February 2021 and April 2022 and stored at 4°C immediately after collection. The samples were analysed within 24 hours and subsequently aliquoted into 2 mL Eppendorf tubes and stored at -20°C for subsequent microRNA analyses. Each sample was analysed for fat, protein, lactose, and casein content using a MilkoScan FT3 (Foss Electric A/S, Hillerød, Denmark; calibrated according to ISO 9622/IDF 141:2013), while SCC and DSCC (neutrophils + lymphocytes, %) were determined using a Fossomatic 7DC (Foss Electric A/S, Hillerød, Denmark; according to ISO 13366-2/IDF 148-2:2006 standards). 72 milk samples were divided into 4 groups of 18 samples each referring to a validated procedure based on the interaction between SCC and DSCC, as described by Stocco et al. [7,8]. Based on the thresholds of 2 x 10⁵ somatic cells/mL for SCC and 68.5% for DSCC as reference points the obtained data allowed for the subdivision into four experimental groups. Cows with mean SCC and DSCC values below both thresholds were classified as the control group (CTRL), while those with SCC and DSCC values above both thresholds were classified as the acute mastitis group (AM). Cows with SCC > 2 × 10⁵ somatic cells/mL and DSCC < 68.5% were classified as the chronic mastitis group (CM), while those with SCC < 2 × 10⁵ somatic cells/mL and DSCC > 68.5% were identified as the susceptible group (SU) (Table 1).

2.3. Circulating microRNAs Extraction and Reverse Transcription

A total of 72 animals were included in this study according to the four differential immune cells composition in milk previously described. C-miRNAs were extracted from milk samples using the Maxwell® RSC miRNA from Plasma and Serum Kit (Promega, USA), an automated system for obtaining high-quality total RNA with enhanced miRNA enrichment on a Maxwell® RSC Instrument (Promega, USA).
c-miRNAs from the immune cells culture medium were extracted using a protocol with TRIzol® Reagent (Life Technologies, USA) as described by Ioannidis et al. [22]. RNA samples were immediately reverse transcribed to complementary DNA (cDNA) using the miRCURY® LNA® RT Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Extractions yield 4 ng of total RNA. RT was performed using a StepOne™ thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, StepOne™ software v.2.3) according to the manufacturer instructions under the following thermal conditions: 1 h at 42°C, followed by 5 min at 94°C. For quality control of extraction and reverse transcription, synthetic RNA spike-ins UniSp-2,4,5 template mix from the RNA Spike-In Kit, For RT (Qiagen, Germany) and UniSp-6 from the miRCURY® LNA® RT Kit (Qiagen, Germany) were used, respectively. The cDNA samples were stored at -20 °C until used.

2.4. Gene Expression Analysis

For the analysis of c-miRNAs expression, cDNA templates were subjected to real time quantitative PCR (qPCR), carried out in a StepOne™ thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, StepOne™ software v.2.3). The diluted cDNA (1:30) was amplified in a volume of 10 μL in duplicates using the miRCURY LNA SYBR® Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and specific primers for bovine sequences of miR-26a-5p, miR-142-5p, miR-146a, miR-148a-3p, or miR-223-3p (Qiagen, Germany) and for synthetic sequences UniSp-2,4,5 and -6 (Qiagen, Germany). Samples were kept at 95°C for 2 min and then subjected to 40 cycles consisting of a denaturation step at 95°C for 10 s, followed by an annealing step at 56°C for 60 s. A melting curve analysis was performed (60–95°C) at the end of the amplification cycles. The expression levels of each gene were normalized to the reference gene miR-148a-3p, a highly abundant c-miRNA constitutively expressed in dairy milk [20,23,24] as the endogenous control and to the synthetic RNA spike-in UniSp-2,4,5 as the exogenous control.

2.5. Isolation of Bovine Lymphocytes, Monocytes and Neutrophils

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and neutrophils were isolated from bovine blood provided by a slaughterhouse certified by the Italian Ministry of Health in accordance with European Regulation (EC) 853/2004 (Macello di Parma s.r.l., Parma, Italy; approval nr. CE-IT-218-M). The isolation was performed using a density gradient protocol with Histopaque-1.077® (Merck; Darmstadt, Germany) as described in Ferrari et al. [25] for PBMCs and modifying the protocol described by Kouoh et al. [26] for neutrophils. After isolation, PBMCs were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 24 hours to allow complete adhesion of monocytes to the flask in cRPMI-1640 + 10% of foetal bovine serum (FBS). The monocytes were washed twice with PBS to remove all non-adherent cells that might have remained in the flask. After removing PBS, the monocytes were incubated with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco, USA) for 5-10 minutes at 37°C, 5% CO2. After incubation, cRPMI-1640 + 10% FBS was added to stop the action of trypsin, and the monocytes were centrifuged and washed twice with the same culture medium.
For neutrophils isolation, 5 mL of EDTA-anticoagulated blood were layered onto Histopaque-1.077®, and after centrifugation, only the erythrocyte layer containing neutrophils was retained. Following erythrocyte lysis, neutrophils with a purity > 95% were obtained. Cells purity was assessed after Diff Quick staining by performing a differential blood cell count of isolated cells smear. Neutrophils were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 1 hour in cRPMI-1640 + 10% FBS to allow them to adjust to new conditions, given their extreme sensitivity even to minor mechanical stimuli.
After being washed twice with cRPMI-1640 + 10% FBS (lymphocytes and monocytes) or with Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) without calcium, magnesium, and phenol red (neutrophils), immune cells were seeded at a density of 2 x 105 cells/well in 24-well plates, and viability was checked with Trypan Blue (never less than 95%).

2.6. Inflammatory Stimulation of Bovine Immune Cells Cultures

Lymphocytes were stimulated for 4 h or 24 h with 5 μg/mL of phytohemagglutinin (PHA, from Phaseolus vulgaris; Sigma-Aldrich) or were maintained in a control condition in cRPMI-1640 + 10% FBS. Neutrophils and monocytes were stimulated for 4 h or 24 h with 1 μg/mL of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, from pathogenic E. coli serotype 0111:B4; Merck) or were maintained in a control condition in cRPMI-1640 + 10% FBS.
After the incubation with PHA or LPS, the culture medium from immune cell cultures was collected and frozen at -20°C from each well of the 24-well plates for subsequent microRNA analyses.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The sample size calculation for 4 groups of milk samples has been carried out through “pwr” package (version 1.3-0) as implemented in R (version 4.3.3) and Rstudio (release 2023.06.1) environment. The prediction was based by requiring a significance level of 0.05, a statistical power of 80% and relying on a prediction of a large effect size, set with a value of 0.4.
c-miRNAs expression profiles have been compared among groups through Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and subsequent pairwise comparisons using Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction and p Value adjustment by Benjamini-Hochberg method. Correlations between miRNAs and between qPCR technique normalization methods have been based on Spearman's rank correlation coefficient rho.

3. Results

3.1. SCC and DSCC in Milk Samples

Following analysis with the Fossomatic 7DC (Foss Electric A/S, Hillerød, Denmark; according to ISO 13366-2/IDF 148-2:2006 standards), data on SCC and DSCC were obtained from milk samples. These data enabled the definition of the four experimental groups for the in vivo study, as previously reported. The mean values of collected data for each experimental cow regarding parity, daily milk yield, and days in milk (DIM) are shown in Table 2. There were not differences in these parameters between groups. Additionally, the scatter plot illustrating the distribution of each dairy cow is shown in Figure 1. The mean values obtained from milk composition analysis and the mean SCC and DSCC values divided by group are reported in Table 3.

3.2. c-miRNAs Expression in Milk

miR-26a-5p (miR-26) showed down-regulation in samples from cows with acute mastitis (0.8 fold, p < 0.01), susceptible (0.7 fold, p < 0.05), and with chronic mastitis (0.8 fold, p < 0.01) compared to the control group, as shown in Figure 2. miR-223-3p (miR-223) was up-regulated in samples from animals with acute mastitis compared to control (26.5 fold, p < 0.01), susceptible (24.4 fold, p < 0.01), or with chronic mastitis cows (25.7 fold, p < 0.01), as shown in Figure 3.
A positive correlation between the two c-miRNAs, miR-223 and miR-26, was also observed for data normalized to both the endogenous and exogenous controls (r = 0.4, p < 0.01), as shown in Figure 4.
miR-142-5p (miR-142) and miR-146a (miR-146) were excluded from the study after an initial analysis of milk samples, as they did not show any differences between groups.

3.3. c-miRNAs Expression in Immune Cells

Regarding miR-26, lymphocytes and monocytes showed no differences between the control and PHA- or LPS-stimulated groups, respectively (Figure 5A,B). However, down-regulation of miR-26 was observed in neutrophils after the 4 h LPS stimulation compared to the control group (p < 0.01), as shown in Figure 5C.
miR-223 showed a down-regulation in lymphocytes stimulated with PHA for 4h (p < 0.05) compared to the control group (Figure 6A). In monocytes and neutrophils, no differences were observed between the control group and the group stimulated with LPS for 4 h (Figure 6B,C). It can be observed only a tendency to up-regulation in the monocytes culture after 4 h of LPS-stimuli.

4. Discussion

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the expression alterations of four c-miRNAs (miR-26-5p, miR-142-5p, miR-146a, and miR-223-3p) in milk samples in relation to different stages of the inflammatory process caused by mastitis in dairy cows. Subsequently, their expression was assessed in the culture medium of activated immune cells. Recently, it has been reported that milk fat miRNome changes in response to LPS challenge in Holstein cows [27]. A previous study demonstrated that miR-26 expressed in mammary gland tissue of donkeys and goats appears to target mRNAs involved in immunity, as well as genes associated with fatty acid biosynthesis and members of the PI3K-Akt and MAPK pathways, resulting, among other effects, in increased resistance to apoptosis [28]. An increase in miR-26 expression can inhibit the hyperglycaemia-induced overexpression of PFKFB3 [29]. Moreover, miR-26 has been observed to induce increased expression of cytokines and chemokines, highlighting its involvement in the inflammatory process regulation [30]. To date, no studies have yet clarified the role of miR-26 in bovine mammary gland tissue and milk. Recent studies have observed a modest increase in miR-26 levels in the blood of dairy cows during early pregnancy [31]. Additionally, its expression in bovine milk has been correlated with the CMT score and lactation stage, showing higher expression during the transition from CMT score 0 to 1 and in cows during their first lactation [20]. Finally, it has been reported that the molecules secreted by S. aureus can modulate the immune response of bovine leukocytes in vitro, highlighting how secretomes from S. aureus strains with different epidemiological behaviors could elicit dramatically different responses in bovine PBMCs [32].
In the present study, miR-26 exhibited in milk a significant down-regulation during inflammation (Figure 2), showing markedly reduced levels in groups with acute or chronic mastitis, as well as in the group of susceptible cows, which were in the very early stages of an inflammatory process at the time of sampling. Considering that miR-26 is ubiquitously expressed in the body and is among the most abundant c-miRNAs in milk and mammary tissues [20], its expression in the culture medium of immune cells is also noteworthy. miR-26 showed a significant down-regulation in neutrophils activated with LPS as early as 4 h after stimulation, and a trend toward reduction was also observed in the activated lymphocytes and monocytes (Figure 5). The reduced expression of miR-26 in both matrices aligns with previous findings, which have already demonstrated a significant decrease in miR-26 expression during inflammatory processes [29,30].
miR-142 has been more extensively studied in bovine mastitis, and its overexpression has been observed in milk, blood, and mammary gland epithelial cells [20,33,34]. Previous studies have shown that through the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, miR-142 induces the release of cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8, suggesting its pro-inflammatory role in the mastitis process [33,34,35]. miR-146 has also been studied in bovine mastitis, and it has been shown to play a negative feedback role in the inflammatory process by down-regulating the Toll-Like Receptor 4/TNF Receptor Associated Factor 6/NF-κB (TLR4/TRAF6/NF-κB) pathway [36]. A significant increase of miR-146 has been observed in the mammary gland tissues of dairy cows with mastitis, but no variation was observed in blood samples [37]. In the present study, both miR-142 and miR-146, after initial analysis, did not show any differences between groups in milk samples.
miR-223 regulates the production and activation of granulocytes by exerting a negative control on the proliferation of progenitors as well as their differentiation and activation [38,39]. It also regulates differentiation and proliferation of dendritic cells and macrophages, regulating their inflammatory or anti-inflammatory polarization. Specifically, overexpression of this c-miRNA promotes M2 macrophages polarization, while reduced expression leads to M1 macrophages polarization [40]. Moreover, miR-223 has been shown to regulate the inflammatory process by promoting the proliferation of T helper cells, inhibiting the release of inflammatory mediators, and blocking inflammatory signaling pathways, such as the NLRP3 inflammasome and NF-κB signaling pathways [40,41,42].
The role of miR-223 in mastitis remains to be fully elucidated, but recent studies have investigated this c-miRNA in bovine mastitis. miR-223 appears to participate in the TLR signaling pathway, leading to reduced transcription and secretion of IL-1, IL-6, and IL-8, while activating innate immunity during mastitis pathogenesis, thereby mitigating inflammation [40,43]. Zhou et al. [44] demonstrated that miR-223 downregulates the NLRP3 inflammasome and the Keap1/Nrf2 signaling pathway, thereby reducing inflammation and oxidative damage associated with the mastitis process. This anti-inflammatory regulatory feature makes miR-223 a potential candidate for the development of novel treatments for bovine mastitis and other inflammatory diseases [44]. In mice with LPS-induced inflammation of mammary epithelial cells, an increase in miR-223 expression has been observed [40]. This upregulation has also been reported in the mammary tissue of cows with mastitis, as well as in bovine mammary epithelial cells (bMECs), granulocytes, dendritic cells, T cells, endothelial cells, and epithelial cells during inflammation [43,45,46,47]. Consistent with previous findings, the present study observed a significant upregulation (p < 0.01) of miR-223 (Figure 3) in milk samples from dairy cows with acute mastitis compared to the control group, as well as to the chronic mastitis and susceptible groups. However, in the lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils cultures (Figure 6) stimulated under inflammatory conditions for just 4 h, no increase in miR-223 levels was detected. This is also evident from results in milk samples, which show a significant and marked increase in cows with acute mastitis, whereas in the susceptible group, no upregulation is observed compared to controls. This highlights that during the very early stages of the inflammatory process, a significant increase in miR-223 release into body fluids, including milk, has not yet occurred. Srikok et al. [17] also reported a significant increase in miR-223 levels in both serum and whole milk from cows with mastitis, noting that the concentration of this c-miRNA was higher in milk than in serum. Additionally, Tzelos et al. [20] compared the levels of c-miRNAs (miR-26, miR-142, miR-146, miR-223) in whole and skimmed milk, demonstrating that concentrations were higher in whole milk. These findings suggest that whole milk is the optimal matrix for evaluating the presence of miR-223, as well as miR-26.
Considering the marked up-regulation of miR-223 in the milk of cows in acute phase of inflammation, miR-223 could be hypothesized as a potential biomarker for evaluation of mastitis stage in dairy cows, when combined with SCC or DSCC, it could enhance the accuracy of these widely used diagnostic methods. Furthermore, the observed correlation between miR-223 and miR-26 suggests that differential evaluation of these two c-miRNAs may provide insights into the progression of inflammation associated with mastitis. miR-26 appears to be responsive in the very early stages of inflammation as seen in the susceptible group, while miR-223 shows a clear response in animals with acute, clinical, and notably subclinical mastitis, according with Srikok et al. [17] findings.

5. Conclusions

miR-223 and miR-26 are proposed as potential new milk biomarkers that could allow for differential evaluation to identify the developmental stage of the inflammation caused by mastitis. The gold standard method for diagnosing this disease is microbiological analysis, which requires excessive time to complete. The two most used alternatives are SCC and CMT, which, as previously mentioned, face issues related to result reliability and operator subjectivity. For these reasons, there is an increasing need for improved diagnostic tools that may enrich the classification of mastitis in cattle, particularly in the detection of early stages of the illness.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.D.O., E.M., S.M. and M.B.; methodology, E.D.O., M.A. and V.C.; software, U.A.; formal analysis, E.D.O., U.A. and M.B.; investigation, E.D.O., M.A. and V.C.; resources, C.C.-G., M.B. and R.S.; data curation, E.D.O., U.A. and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, E.D.O. and M.B.; writing—review and editing, E.M., S.M., C.C.-G., F.D.R., M.B. and R.S.; supervision, F.D.R., M.B. and R.S.; project administration, M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work has benefited from the equipment and framework of the COMP-HUB and COMP-R Initiatives, funded by the ‘Departments of Excellence’ program of the Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR, 2018-2022 and MUR, 2023-2027).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Huszenicza, G.; Jánosi, S.; Kulcsár, M.; Kóródi, P.; Reiczigel, J.; Kátai, L.; Peters, A.; De Rensis, F. Effects of Clinical Mastitis on Ovarian Function in Post-partum Dairy Cows. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2005, 40, 199–204. [CrossRef]
  2. Sharun, K.; Dhama, K.; Tiwari, R.; Gugjoo, M.B.; Yatoo, M.I.; Patel, S.K.; Pathak, M.; Karthik, K.; Khurana, S.K.; Singh, R.; et al. Advances in therapeutic and managemental approaches of bovine mastitis: a comprehensive review. Veter- Q. 2021, 41, 107–136. [CrossRef]
  3. Zecconi, A.; Zaghen, F.; Meroni, G.; Sora, V.; Martino, P.A.; Laterza, G.; Zanini, L. Early Milk Total and Differential Cell Counts as a Diagnostic Tool to Improve Antimicrobial Therapy Protocols. Animals 2023, 13, 1143. [CrossRef]
  4. Piccinini, R.; Binda, E.; Belotti, M.; Casirani, G.; Zecconi, A. Comparison of blood and milk non-specific immune parameters in heifers after calving in relation to udder health. Veter- Res. 2005, 36, 747–757. [CrossRef]
  5. Damm, M.; Holm, C.; Blaabjerg, M.; Bro, M.N.; Schwarz, D. Differential somatic cell count—A novel method for routine mastitis screening in the frame of Dairy Herd Improvement testing programs. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 4926–4940. [CrossRef]
  6. Zecconi, A.; Vairani, D.; Cipolla, M.; Rizzi, N.; Zanini, L. Assessment of subclinical mastitis diagnostic accuracy by differential cell count in individual cow milk. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 18, 460–465. [CrossRef]
  7. Stocco, G.; Summer, A.; Cipolat-Gotet, C.; Zanini, L.; Vairani, D.; Dadousis, C.; Zecconi, A. Differential Somatic Cell Count as a Novel Indicator of Milk Quality in Dairy Cows. Animals 2020, 10, 753. [CrossRef]
  8. Stocco, G.; Cipolat-Gotet, C.; Stefanon, B.; Zecconi, A.; Francescutti, M.; Mountricha, M.; Summer, A. Herd and animal factors affect the variability of total and differential somatic cell count in bovine milk. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 101. [CrossRef]
  9. Arora, S.; Dev, K.; Agarwal, B.; Das, P.; Syed, M.A. Macrophages: Their role, activation and polarization in pulmonary diseases. 2017, 223, 383–396. [CrossRef]
  10. Halasa, T.; Kirkeby, C. Differential Somatic Cell Count: Value for Udder Health Management. Front. Veter- Sci. 2020, 7. [CrossRef]
  11. Ceciliani, F.; Morales, G.Á.; De Matteis, G.; Grandoni, F.; Ferreira, R.F.; Roccabianca, P.; Lecchi, C. Methods in isolation and characterization of bovine monocytes and macrophages. Methods 2020, 186, 22–41. [CrossRef]
  12. Rosales, C. Neutrophil: A Cell with Many Roles in Inflammation or Several Cell Types?. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 113. [CrossRef]
  13. Sarikaya, H.; Schlamberger, G.; Meyer, H.; Bruckmaier, R. Leukocyte Populations and mRNA Expression of Inflammatory Factors in Quarter Milk Fractions at Different Somatic Cell Score Levels in Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 2479–2486. [CrossRef]
  14. Miretti, S.; Lecchi, C.; Ceciliani, F.; Baratta, M. MicroRNAs as Biomarkers for Animal Health and Welfare in Livestock. Front. Veter- Sci. 2020, 7. [CrossRef]
  15. Lai, Y.-C.; Fujikawa, T.; Maemura, T.; Ando, T.; Kitahara, G.; Endo, Y.; Yamato, O.; Koiwa, M.; Kubota, C.; Miura, N. Inflammation-related microRNA expression level in the bovine milk is affected by mastitis. PLOS ONE 2017, 12, e0177182. [CrossRef]
  16. Luoreng, Z.-M.; Wang, X.-P.; Mei, C.-G.; Zan, L.-S. Comparison of microRNA Profiles between Bovine Mammary Glands Infected with Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 87–99. [CrossRef]
  17. Srikok, S.; Patchanee, P.; Boonyayatra, S.; Chuammitri, P. Potential role of MicroRNA as a diagnostic tool in the detection of bovine mastitis. Prev. Veter- Med. 2020, 182, 105101. [CrossRef]
  18. Luoreng, Z.-M.; Yang, J.; Wang, X.-P.; Wei, D.-W.; Zan, L.-S. Expression Profiling of microRNA From Peripheral Blood of Dairy Cows in Response to Staphylococcus aureus-Infected Mastitis. Front. Veter- Sci. 2021, 8. [CrossRef]
  19. Cuccato, M.; Divari, S.; Giannuzzi, D.; Grange, C.; Moretti, R.; Rinaldi, A.; Leroux, C.; Sacchi, P.; Cannizzo, F.T. Extracellular vesicle miRNome during subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. Veter- Res. 2024, 55, 1–13. [CrossRef]
  20. Tzelos, T.; Ho, W.; Charmana, V.I.; Lee, S.; Donadeu, F.X. MiRNAs in milk can be used towards early prediction of mammary gland inflammation in cattle. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1–8. [CrossRef]
  21. ICAR (International Committee for Animal Recording). 2023 Section 2 – Guidelines for Dairy Cows Milk Recording.
  22. Ioannidis, J.; Risse, J.; Donadeu, F.X. Profiling of MicroRNAs in the Biofluids of Livestock Species. In MicroRNA Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology; Ying, SY. (eds); Humana Press, New York, NY 2018; vol 1733.
  23. Schanzenbach, C.I.; Kirchner, B.; Ulbrich, S.E.; Pfaffl, M.W. Can milk cell or skim milk miRNAs be used as biomarkers for early pregnancy detection in cattle?. PloS one 2017, 12(2), e0172220.
  24. Del Pozo-Acebo, L.; Hazas, M.L.L.; Tomé-Carneiro, J.; Gil-Cabrerizo, P.; San-Cristobal, R.; Busto, R.; García-Ruiz, A.; Dávalos, A. Bovine Milk-Derived Exosomes as a Drug Delivery Vehicle for miRNA-Based Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(3), 1105.
  25. Ferrari, L.; Martelli, P.; Saleri, R.; De Angelis, E.; Cavalli, V.; Bresaola, M.; Benetti, M.; Borghetti, P. Lymphocyte activation as cytokine gene expression and secretion is related to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) isolate after in vitro homologous and heterologous recall of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from pigs vaccinated and exposed to natural infection. Veter- Immunol. Immunopathol. 2013, 151, 193–206. [CrossRef]
  26. Kouoh, F.; Gressier, B.; Luyckx, M.; Brunet, C.; Dine, T.; Ballester, L.; Cazin, M.; Cazin, J.C. A Simple Method for Isolating Human and Rabbit Polymorphonuclear Neutrophils(PMNs).. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 23, 1382–1383. [CrossRef]
  27. Leroux, C.; Cuccato, M.; Pawłowski, K.; Cannizzo, F.T.; Sacchi, P.; Pires, J.A.A.; Faulconnier, Y. Milk fat miRNome changes in response to LPS challenge in Holstein cows. Veter- Res. 2023, 54, 1–10. [CrossRef]
  28. Fei, Y.; Gai, Y.; Liao, Q.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Li, B.; Bai, M.; Li, N.; Deng, L. An Integrated Analysis of Lactation-Related miRNA and mRNA Expression Profiles in Donkey Mammary Glands. Genes 2022, 13, 1637. [CrossRef]
  29. He, X.; Cheng, X.; Ding, J.; Xiong, M.; Chen, B.; Cao, G. Hyperglycemia induces miR-26-5p down-regulation to overexpress PFKFB3 and accelerate epithelial–mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 2902–2917. [CrossRef]
  30. Uttamani, J.R.; Naqvi, A.R.; Estepa, A.M.V.; Kulkarni, V.; Brambila, M.F.; Martínez, G.; Chapa, G.; Wu, C.D.; Li, W.; Rivas-Tumanyan, S.; et al. Downregulation of miRNA-26 in chronic periodontitis interferes with innate immune responses and cell migration by targeting phospholipase C beta 1. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2022, 50, 102–113. [CrossRef]
  31. Tzelos, T.; Lee, S.; Pegg, A.; Donadeu, F.X. Association between blood miR-26a levels following artificial insemination, and pregnancy outcome in dairy cattle. PLOS ONE 2023, 18, e0289342. [CrossRef]
  32. Di Mauro, S.; Filipe, J.; Facchin, A.; Roveri, L.; Addis, M.F.; Monistero, V.; Piccinini, R.; Sala, G.; Pravettoni, D.; Zamboni, C.; et al. The secretome of Staphylococcus aureus strains with opposite within-herd epidemiological behavior affects bovine mononuclear cell response. Veter- Res. 2023, 54, 1–9. [CrossRef]
  33. Lu, J.; Gu, B.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.; Lu, J. miR-142-5p regulates lipopolysaccharide-induced bovine epithelial cell proliferation and apoptosis via targeting BAG5. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 1–11. [CrossRef]
  34. Hue, D.T.; Petrovski, K.; Chen, T.; Williams, J.L.; Bottema, C.D. Analysis of immune-related microRNAs in cows and newborn calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 106, 2866–2878. [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, J.; Aswath, K.; Schroeder, S.G.; Lippolis, J.D.; Reinhardt, T.A.; Sonstegard, T.S. MicroRNA expression profiles of bovine milk exosomes in response to Staphylococcus aureus infection. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 1–10. [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, X.-P.; Luoreng, Z.-M.; Zan, L.-S.; Li, F.; Li, N. Bovine miR-146a regulates inflammatory cytokines of bovine mammary epithelial cells via targeting the TRAF6 gene. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 7648–7658. [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, X.P.; Luoreng, Z.M.; Zan, L.S.; Raza, S.H.A.; Li, F.; Li, N.; Liu, S. Expression patterns of miR-146a and miR-146b in mastitis infected dairy cattle. Mol. Cell. Probes 2016, 30, 342–344. [CrossRef]
  38. Johnnidis, J.B.; Harris, M.H.; Wheeler, R.T.; Stehling-Sun, S.; Lam, M.H.; Kirak, O.; Brummelkamp, T.R.; Fleming, M.D.; Camargo, F.D. Regulation of progenitor cell proliferation and granulocyte function by microRNA-223. Nature 2008, 451, 1125–1129. [CrossRef]
  39. Li, L.; Huang, J.; Zhang, X.; Ju, Z.; Qi, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Miao, W.; Zhong, J.; Hou, M.; Hang, S. One SNP in the 3'-UTR of HMGB1 gene affects the binding of target bta-miR-223 and is involved in mastitis in dairy cattle. Immunogenetics 2012, 64(11), 817–824.
  40. Jiao, P.; Wang, X.-P.; Luoreng, Z.-M.; Yang, J.; Jia, L.; Ma, Y.; Wei, D.-W. miR-223: An Effective Regulator of Immune Cell Differentiation and Inflammation. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 17, 2308–2322. [CrossRef]
  41. Yan, Y.; Lu, K.; Ye, T.; Zhang, Z. MicroRNA 223 attenuates LPS induced inflammation in an acute lung injury model via the NLRP3 inflammasome and TLR4/NF κB signaling pathway via RHOB. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2019, 43(3), 1467–1477.
  42. Valmiki, S.; Ahuja, V.; Puri, N.; Paul, J. miR-125b and miR-223 Contribute to Inflammation by Targeting the Key Molecules of NFκB Pathway. Front. Med. 2020, 6, 313. [CrossRef]
  43. Jiao, P.; Wang, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, X.; Luoreng, Z. Bta-miR-223 Targeting the RHOB Gene in Dairy Cows Attenuates LPS-Induced Inflammatory Responses in Mammary Epithelial Cells. Cells 2022, 11(19), 3144.
  44. Zhou, M.; Barkema, H.W.; Gao, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, Y.; Kastelic, J.P.; Khan, S.; Liu, G.; Han, B. MicroRNA miR-223 modulates NLRP3 and Keap1, mitigating lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation and oxidative stress in bovine mammary epithelial cells and murine mammary glands. Veter- Res. 2023, 54, 1–14. [CrossRef]
  45. Ifergan, I.; Chen, S.; Zhang, B.; Miller, S.D. Cutting Edge: MicroRNA-223 Regulates Myeloid Dendritic Cell–Driven Th17 Responses in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 1455–1459. [CrossRef]
  46. Mohajeri, M.; Banach, M.; Atkin, S.L.; Butler, A.E.; Ruscica, M.; Watts, G.F.; Sahebkar, A. MicroRNAs: Novel Molecular Targets and Response Modulators of Statin Therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 39, 967–981. [CrossRef]
  47. Sun, Y.; Liu, M.-W.; Zhao, Y.-H.; Lu, Y.-X.; Wang, Y.-A.; Tong, C.-W. BAICALIN ATTENUATES LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE-INDUCED RENAL TUBULAR EPITHELIAL CELL INJURY BY INHIBITING THE TXNIP/NLRP3 SIGNALLING PATHWAY VIA INCREASING miR-223-3p EXPRESSION. JBRHA 2020, 34, 69–82.
Preprints 146014 g001
Figure 1. Scatter plot showing the distribution of each dairy cow based on the two thresholds for somatic cell count (2 x 105 somatic cells/mL) and differential somatic cell count (68.5%).
Figure 1. Scatter plot showing the distribution of each dairy cow based on the two thresholds for somatic cell count (2 x 105 somatic cells/mL) and differential somatic cell count (68.5%).
Preprints 146014 g001
Preprints 146014 g002
Figure 2. Relative expression levels reported as mean ± SD of bta-miR-26a-5p in milk samples from each group. Data were analysed using the 2-ΔΔCq method, in which the expression levels of the gene have been normalized to the expression of the reference genes bta-miR-148a-3p and UniSp2. * indicates a significant difference with a p-value < 0.05; ** indicates a significant difference with a p-value < 0.01. CTRL= control, AM= with acute mastitis, SU= susceptible, CM= with chronic mastitis.
Figure 2. Relative expression levels reported as mean ± SD of bta-miR-26a-5p in milk samples from each group. Data were analysed using the 2-ΔΔCq method, in which the expression levels of the gene have been normalized to the expression of the reference genes bta-miR-148a-3p and UniSp2. * indicates a significant difference with a p-value < 0.05; ** indicates a significant difference with a p-value < 0.01. CTRL= control, AM= with acute mastitis, SU= susceptible, CM= with chronic mastitis.
Preprints 146014 g002
Preprints 146014 g003
Figure 3. Relative expression levels reported as mean ± SD of bta-miR-223-3p in milk samples from each group. Data were analysed using the 2-ΔΔCq method, in which the expression levels of the gene have been normalized to the expression of the reference genes bta-miR-148a-3p and UniSp2. ** indicates a significant difference with a p-value < 0.01. CTRL= control, AM= with acute mastitis, SU= susceptible, CM= with chronic mastitis.
Figure 3. Relative expression levels reported as mean ± SD of bta-miR-223-3p in milk samples from each group. Data were analysed using the 2-ΔΔCq method, in which the expression levels of the gene have been normalized to the expression of the reference genes bta-miR-148a-3p and UniSp2. ** indicates a significant difference with a p-value < 0.01. CTRL= control, AM= with acute mastitis, SU= susceptible, CM= with chronic mastitis.
Preprints 146014 g003
Preprints 146014 g004
Figure 4. Positive correlation between bta-miR-223 and bta-miR-26. Data have been normalized to the expression of the reference genes bta-miR-148a-3p and UniSp2. R and p-value are displayed on the graphs.
Figure 4. Positive correlation between bta-miR-223 and bta-miR-26. Data have been normalized to the expression of the reference genes bta-miR-148a-3p and UniSp2. R and p-value are displayed on the graphs.
Preprints 146014 g004
Preprints 146014 g005
Figure 5. Relative expression levels reported as mean ± SD of bta-miR-26a-5p in A. lymphocytes, B. monocytes and C. neutrophils culture medium, unstimulated or stimulated for 4h with PHA or LPS. Each group includes samples of 3 replicates from 3 separate experiments. Data were analysed using the 2-ΔΔCq method, in which the expression levels of the gene have been normalized to the expression of the reference genes bta-miR-148a-3p and UniSp2. ** indicates a significant difference with a p-value < 0.01.
Figure 5. Relative expression levels reported as mean ± SD of bta-miR-26a-5p in A. lymphocytes, B. monocytes and C. neutrophils culture medium, unstimulated or stimulated for 4h with PHA or LPS. Each group includes samples of 3 replicates from 3 separate experiments. Data were analysed using the 2-ΔΔCq method, in which the expression levels of the gene have been normalized to the expression of the reference genes bta-miR-148a-3p and UniSp2. ** indicates a significant difference with a p-value < 0.01.
Preprints 146014 g005
Preprints 146014 g006
Figure 6. Relative expression levels reported as mean ± SD of bta-miR-223-3p in A. lymphocytes, B. monocytes and C. neutrophils culture medium, unstimulated or stimulated for 4h with PHA or LPS. Each group includes samples of 3 replicates from 3 separate experiments. Data were analysed using the 2-ΔΔCq method, in which the expression levels of the gene have been normalized to the expression of the reference genes bta-miR-148a-3p and UniSp2. * indicates a significant difference with a p-value < 0.05.
Figure 6. Relative expression levels reported as mean ± SD of bta-miR-223-3p in A. lymphocytes, B. monocytes and C. neutrophils culture medium, unstimulated or stimulated for 4h with PHA or LPS. Each group includes samples of 3 replicates from 3 separate experiments. Data were analysed using the 2-ΔΔCq method, in which the expression levels of the gene have been normalized to the expression of the reference genes bta-miR-148a-3p and UniSp2. * indicates a significant difference with a p-value < 0.05.
Preprints 146014 g006
Table 1. Division into groups of dairy cows into four categories according to the threshold parameters of SCC and DSCC and their description by group. CTRL= control, SU= susceptible, AM= with acute mastitis, CM= with chronic mastitis.
Table 1. Division into groups of dairy cows into four categories according to the threshold parameters of SCC and DSCC and their description by group. CTRL= control, SU= susceptible, AM= with acute mastitis, CM= with chronic mastitis.
Group SCC value (cells/mL) DSCC value (%) Description
CTRL < 2 x 105 < 68.5 Indicative values of absence of inflammation
SU < 2 x 105 > 68.5 Indicative values of initial inflammation resulting in
increased susceptibility to
mastitis
AM > 2 x 105 > 68.5 Indicative values of acute
inflammatory state
CM > 2 x 105 < 68.5 Indicative values of a
chronic decease
Table 2. Mean values ± SD of parity, days in milk and daily milk yield of experimental cows divided by group. CTRL= control, SU= susceptible, AM= with acute mastitis, CM= with chronic mastitis.
Table 2. Mean values ± SD of parity, days in milk and daily milk yield of experimental cows divided by group. CTRL= control, SU= susceptible, AM= with acute mastitis, CM= with chronic mastitis.
Group Parity Days in milk (d) Milk yield (kg/d)
CTRL 2,83 ± 1.34 184 ± 108 13,75 ± 4.81
SU 2,56 ± 1.34 205 ± 118 12,44 ± 3.79
AM 3,00 ± 2.14 181 ± 117 11,36 ± 4.38
CM 2,72 ± 1.93 217 ± 107 10,53 ± 3.84
Table 3. Mean values ± SD of composition and somatic cell traits of milk samples divided by group. CTRL= control, SU= susceptible, AM= with acute mastitis, CM= with chronic mastitis.
Table 3. Mean values ± SD of composition and somatic cell traits of milk samples divided by group. CTRL= control, SU= susceptible, AM= with acute mastitis, CM= with chronic mastitis.
Group Fat (%) Protein (%) Casein (%) Lactose (%) SCC (cells/mL) DSCC (%)
CTRL 4.06 3.70 2.95 4.85 0.38 x 105 ± 0.01 52.52
SU 4.08 3.72 2.96 4.84 0.73 x 105 ± 0.02 76.73
AM 4.08 3.78 2.98 4.65 5.45 x 105 ± 0.30 79.37
CM 4.39 3.98 3.15 4.62 2.91 x 105 ± 0.62 60.80
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

Downloads

47

Views

35

Comments

0

Subscription

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

Email

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated