Submitted:
24 January 2025
Posted:
27 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Epidemiology of SSIs
- Higher risk of ICU admission
- Greater mortality risks (2 to 11 times greater)
- Increased risk of readmission into the hospital by five-fold
- Extended periods of recovery and even possible disability
3. Classification of SSIs
3.1. Superficial Incisional SSIs
- Purulent discharge from the surgical site
- An organism isolated from a surgical site
- A clinical diagnosis of an SSI by the surgeon
- Intentional incision of the wound by the surgeon with at least one associated symptom such as swelling, erythema, pain, or warmth.
3.2. Deep Incisional SSIs
3.3. Organ/Space SSIs
4. Risk Factors for SSIs
4.1. Patient-Related Factors
- Age: Older adults more than 65 years old have an increased susceptibility to infection with advancing age, largely because of the associated immune dysfunction [10].
- Immunocompromised state: This is characterized by people having a low immune status like HIV/AIDS. People infected with such are highly exposed to SSIs, as their body fails to fight such infections, which is quite complex [11].
- Smoking: Smoking negatively affects the healing process in the body and increases resistance to infections; thus, such people tend to have a risk of experiencing SSIs and other secondary complications [11].
- Obesity: Individuals with a higher body mass index and obesity have an increased chance of SSIs. These may be because of poor blood circulation and elevated tension on surgical wounds [11].
- Diabetes: Inadequately controlled diabetes is a risk factor for infection as it can make the immune system less efficient in fighting infections.
- Malnutrition: Poor nutrition compromises the immune system and prolongs the healing process of wounds, making a person susceptible to infections.
- Hypovolemia: Low blood volume prevents the tissues from getting sufficient oxygen and nutrients that fight infection, hence preventing it.
- Steroids: The use of steroids over a long period leads to suppression of the immune system, and hence makes an individual prone to infections.
- Previous infections: Infections elsewhere may spread to the surgical site leading to SSIs.
- Prolonged preoperative in-hospital stay: Longer stays before surgery increase the chances of exposure to nosocomially acquired infections [12].
- Poor preoperative skin antisepsis: Poor skin hygiene can double the bacterial load on the skin thus increasing the probability of contamination intra-operatively.
4.2. Procedure-Related Factors
- Surgery type: Emergency and internal organ surgeries (clean-contaminated, contaminated and dirty wounds) have a higher SSI risk than clean surgeries, with infection risk increasing with contact with contaminated body sites and fluids [13].
- Duration of surgery: Longer surgical procedures increase the time the wound is exposed, increasing the risk of contamination.
- Open surgery: Open surgeries have larger incisions and greater tissue disruption, with a higher risk of SSIs than laparoscopic procedures.
- Use of drains: Surgical drains may offer a route for bacteria to enter the wound.
- Presence of foreign material: The presence of foreign materials, including implants and prostheses, increases the risk of infection.
- Improper hair removal: Shaving with a razor near the surgical site can cause irritation to the skin and increase the chance of infection; clippers are usually safer than razors [14].
- Hypothermia: Low body temperature during surgery can depress immune function and wound healing.
- Abnormal fluid collection: Hematomas and seromas can create an ideal environment for bacterial growth [15].
4.3. External Factors
- Contamination of surgical site, equipment, or personnel: Poor sterilization or disinfection of instruments, the environment of surgery, or personnel members can introduce bacteria to the wound [16].
- Sharpness of surgical instrument: A dull surgical blade may hold biological materials even after sterilization, which may eventually lead to contamination and SSIs [9].
- Inadequate ventilation in the operating room: The lack of good ventilation in the operating room tends to increase the concentration of airborne bacteria, thus enhancing the possibility of wound contamination [11].
- Increased traffic in the operating room: High people traffic in and out of the operating room increases the possibilities of bringing in contaminants [10].
5. Microbiology of SSIs
5.1. Common Bacterial Pathogens
- Staphylococcus aureus (including MRSA)
- Staphylococcus epidermidis
- Streptococcus species
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa
- Escherichia coli
- Enterococcus faecalis
- Citrobacter freundii
- Bacillus cereus
5.2. Surgical Instrument Contamination
6. Treatment of SSIs
6.1. General Treatment Approaches
- Antibiotics: Most SSIs are treated with an antibiotic as the main form of therapy. The choice and type of antibiotic will depend on the suspected agent or identified agent of the infection, severity of illness and patient's medical history among others. If the wound discharges, the culture of pus can be done and sent for sensitivity test for details of etiologic bacteria and the best antibiotic [1,2]. The duration of treatment is according to the severity and response toward infection; usually, an antibiotic treatment requires at least a week's time. Patients can be started on intravenous antibiotics that can later be transitioned to oral antibiotics once the patient's condition improves. The patient should complete the dose of antibiotics prescribed even if the patient feels better because this will ensure that all the infection is eradicated and prevents the development of antibiotic resistance.
-
Surgical therapy: Other than antibiotics, in the majority of cases presenting with an obvious collection of pus, necrosis of tissues, or the presence of a foreign body, the patient would require surgical therapy as an adjunct. Surgical management may include:
- ∘
- Open the wound: Such improved visualization, cleaning and draining of the infected site.
- ∘
- Debridement: The dead or infected tissues, which would stimulate their proliferation and healing, will have to be removed. Mechanical debridement is preferred but even possible with enzymatic agents, only if mechanical debridement would not be used for medical reasons.
- ∘
- Irrigation Sterile saline solution irrigates the area to remove bacteria and debris from it.
- ∘
- Abscess drainage: If an abscess is present, it must be drained to obtain clearance of an infection.
- ∘
- Dressing: Wound dressing with saline-soaked dressings to keep the wound moist and enhance healing.
- Wound care: The wound needs proper care in healing and prevention of its reoccurrence. This can include cleaning, dressing changes, and NPWT, also known as VAC dressings.
- Supportive care: The support cares basically focus on optimizing a patient's overall health and supporting a patient to recover. It encompasses care like pain relief, fluids and electrolyte maintenance, nutritional support.
6.2. Specific Treatment Considerations
-
Specific treatment strategies may be adapted depending on the type of SSI and the etiologic microorganisms:
- ∘
- Superficial incisional SSIs: These infections can usually be managed with wound care and oral antibiotics.
- ∘
- Deep incisional SSIs: Such infections might require surgical debridement and intravenous antibiotics.
- ∘
- Organ/space SSIs: These infections typically require extensive surgical intervention, prolonged antibiotic therapy, and intensive care management.
-
Management of SSIs caused by specific microorganisms:
- ∘
-
Gram-positive bacteria: Some gram-positive pathogens include Staphylococcus aureus, including MRSA, and Enterococcus species. Therapeutic choices include:
- ■
- β-Lactams: Cefazolin is the drug of choice for most SSIs. Nevertheless, other β-lactams like ceftaroline and ceftobiprole can be utilized for treating MRSA infections [16].
- ■
- Vancomycin: It is an alternative for patients who are allergic to β-lactams or in high MRSA-prevalence settings [14].
- ■
- Daptomycin: This is a lipopeptide antibiotic with a high level of activity against MRSA and other gram-positive bacteria [18].
- ■
- ■
- Linezolid: This is an oxazolidinone antibiotic with a wide spectrum of activity against MRSA and other resistant gram-positive bacteria.
-
Gram-negative bacteria: Such pathogens include Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The choice of therapy includes:
- ∘
- Third-generation cephalosporins: SSIs due to susceptible gram-negative bacteria are commonly treated with third-generation cephalosporins; namely ceftriaxone and cefotaxime [19].
- ∘
- Carbapenems: Other broad-spectrum antibiotics comprise carbapenems like imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem that are active against many gram-negative bacteria. However, use should be limited to critical cases because carbapenems can favor the development of resistance [20].
- ∘
- β-Lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: These include ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam. These are effective against most resistant gram-negative bacteria [21].
- ∘
- Cefiderocol: This is a new siderophore cephalosporin that is active against a wide range of gram-negative bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant strains [20].
- ∘
- Tigecycline: This is a glycylcycline antibiotic that is active against most MDR gram-negative bacteria [20].
- ∘
- Colistin: This is an older antibiotic reserved for infections caused by MDR gram-negative bacteria that are resistant to other antibiotics [19].
- Other considerations:
- Combination therapy: For infections caused by MDR bacteria or to boost the effectiveness of a particular antibiotic, antibiotics can be administered in combination.
- Duration of therapy: The duration of antibiotic therapy varies with the severity and type of SSI. Superficial SSIs may require only a few days of antibiotics, while deep or organ/space SSIs may require weeks or even months of treatment.
7. Prevention of SSIs
7.1. Preoperative Interventions
-
Optimizing Patient Health [23]
- ∘
- Smoking cessation: Patients who smoke are significantly at risk of SSIs. Quitting smoking a few weeks prior to surgery can greatly improve wound healing and reduce infection risk.
- ∘
- Weight management: Patients who are overweight or obese are at higher risk for SSIs. If possible, maintaining a healthy weight before surgery improves outcomes.
- ∘
- Control of diabetes: Good blood glucose control is important to achieve optimal wound healing. Patients with diabetes should collaborate with their provider to optimize their management of blood glucose before surgery.
- ∘
- Pre-existing infections: Treatment of any pre-existing infections, such as urinary tract infections or skin infections, before surgery can reduce the risk of SSI development.
- ∘
- Medication review: Certain medications, like corticosteroids, can suppress the immune system and increase infection risk. Healthcare providers should review the patient's medication list and make adjustments if necessary.
-
Reducing Microbial Burden [24]
- ∘
- Preoperative hygiene: Patients should shower or bathe with an antiseptic solution, such as chlorhexidine, the night before and/or the morning of surgery. This reduces the number of bacteria on the skin.
- ∘
- Hair removal: Hair removal, if required, must be done just before the surgery by clippers rather than shaving to reduce the irritation and micro-abrasions that may enhance infection.
- ∘
- Nasal decolonization: Nasal screening for Staphylococcus aureus (including MRSA) can be done for high-risk procedures such as cardiac and orthopedic surgery. Patients with positive results can be given intranasal mupirocin to decrease the bacterial colonization in the nose.
- ∘
- Oral hygiene: Proper oral hygiene and professional dental cleaning before surgery can reduce the SSIs, especially after abdominal surgery.
-
Provision of a Clean Surgical Environment [25]
- ∘
- Antibiotic prophylaxis: Use of the appropriate antibiotics within 60 minutes before surgical incision is used to prevent SSIs through eliminating common pathogens that may cause infection in surgical wounds. Antibiotic selection depends on the type of surgery and risk factors of the patient involved.
- ∘
- Sterile technique: Maintaining a high standard of sterile technique by the surgical team would include proper hand hygiene, the use of gloves and gowns, proper manipulation of surgical instruments, to name a few.
- ∘
- Environmental control: Optimizing the conditions of the operating room, including appropriate ventilation and air filtration, can help reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria and thus reduce the risk of wound contamination.
7.2. Intraoperative Measures
- Adherence to strict sterile technique: The sterile field must be maintained throughout the procedure. This includes proper hand hygiene, surgical attire, and aseptic handling of instruments and materials.
- Reducing surgical time: The longer the surgical time, the higher the risk of infection. Efficient surgical techniques and careful planning can reduce surgical time.
- Proper tissue handling: Gentle tissue handling minimizes trauma and reduces the risk of infection.
- Hemostasis control: Effective hemostasis prevents the accumulation of blood and serum, which can act as a medium for bacterial growth.
- Wound closure techniques: Proper wound closure techniques, including the right kind of suture material and tension, promotes optimal wound healing and minimizes the risk of infection.
7.3. Postoperative Care
- Care of the wound: Regular cleaning, dressing change, and observation for signs of infection comprise proper wound care.
- Management of pain: Effective pain management fosters patient comfort and ambulation, thus helping with wound healing.
- Early ambulation: As appropriate, early ambulation enhances blood circulation to reduce the occurrence of complications.
- Patient education: Educating patients about proper wound care and signs of infection empowers them to participate in their recovery and seek medical attention if necessary.
8. Global Implications of SSIs
8.1. SSI Rates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- Lack of resources and infrastructure: The lack of adequate healthcare infrastructure, including access to sterile supplies, clean water, and trained healthcare personnel, increases the rate of infection.
- Challenges of implementing the infection control measures: Least resources and minimal training can prevent the implementation of clear infection control protocols.
- Higher prevalence of underlying medical conditions: Malnutrition, HIV/AIDS, and other underlying medical conditions increase susceptibility to infections.
8.2. Antimicrobial Resistance
- Prudent use of antibiotics: Providing antibiotics only when necessary and ensuring a patient takes the full course so that resistance does not take place.
- Antimicrobial stewardship programs: Hospital-based programs focused on antimicrobial use as well as the prevention of the spread of resistance.
- Infection prevention and control: Preventing infections at the outset reduces the use of antibiotics and conserves their efficacy.
8.3. Surgical Instrument Contamination
- Stringent cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization process: Sterility can be ensured only by following all the strict protocols of the reprocessing of instruments.
- Regular maintenance and quality control: Monitoring the effectiveness of sterilization processes and ensuring equipment is properly maintained is very important.
- Training and education: It is important that healthcare personnel be provided with the proper training on sterilization techniques and infection control measures.
9. Research and Future Directions
- New prevention methods: New antiseptic solutions, new wound dressings, and surgical techniques that are effective in preventing infections.
- New treatments: The development of new antibiotics and alternative treatment modalities, such as antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and phage therapy, to combat antibiotic resistance.
- Emerging pathogens and resistance: new pathogens being discovered and the continued spread of antibiotic resistance to guide prevention and treatments efforts better.
- Instrument contamination: Developing instruments with better surface properties, research into new methods of sterilization that do not contaminate the instruments.
- Standardization of guidelines and best practice: Standardize guidelines and best practice in prevention and management of SSI especially in resource-poor settings.
- International cooperation and knowledge sharing: Facilitate collaboration and knowledge sharing among researchers, clinicians, and healthcare organizations worldwide for further progress in the fight against SSI.
10. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Ethics Approval
Consent to Participate
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Giacometti, A.; Cirioni, O.; Schimizzi, A.M.; Del Prete, M.S.; Barchiesi, F.; D'Errico, M.M.; et al. Epidemiology and microbiology of surgical wound infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38, 918–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seidelman, J.L.; Mantyh, C.R.; Anderson, D.J. Surgical Site Infection Prevention: A Review. JAMA. 2023, 329, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bondoc, A.J. 14 - Surgical Infection. In: Stehr W, editor. The Mont Reid Surgical Handbook (Sixth Edition). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2008. p. 143-64.
- Smyth, E.T.M.; Emmerson, A.M. Surgical site infection surveillance. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2000, 45, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinchera, B.; Buonomo, A.R.; Schiano Moriello, N.; Scotto, R.; Villari, R.; Gentile, I. Update on the Management of Surgical Site Infections. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, D.R.; Alverdy, J.C.; Vavilala, M.S. Emerging Paradigms in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection: The Patient Microbiome and Antimicrobial Resistance. Anesthesiology. 2022, 137, 252–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Axler, E.; Lu, A.; Darrell, M.; Vielemeyer, O.; Lipner, S.R. Surgical site infections are uncommon following nail biopsies in a single-center case-control study of 502 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024, 91, 552–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manu, F.M.; Marthya, A.; Salim, S.M.; Elias, V. Unusual Case of Surgical Site Infection with Uncommon Organism – Burkholderia pseudomallei. Journal of Orthopaedic Association of South Indian States. 2022, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, D.E.; Bartley, J.; Whittington, C.; Garcia, L.; Chand, K.; Turangi, C. Pilot study: Post-surgical infections could be related with lack of sharpness in surgical tools. PLOS ONE. 2022, 17, e0261322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owusu, E.; Asane, F.W.; Bediako-Bowan, A.A.; Afutu, E. Bacterial Contamination of Surgical Instruments Used at the Surgery Department of a Major Teaching Hospital in a Resource-Limited Country: An Observational Study. Diseases. 2022, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dancer, S.J.; Stewart, M.; Coulombe, C.; Gregori, A.; Virdi, M. Surgical site infections linked to contaminated surgical instruments. J Hosp Infect. 2012, 81, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baviskar, A.S.; Khatib, K.I.; Rajpal, D.; Dongare, H.C. Nosocomial infections in surgical intensive care unit: A retrospective single-center study. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2019, 9, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lawson, E.H.; Hall, B.L.; Ko, C.Y. Risk factors for superficial vs deep/organ-space surgical site infections: implications for quality improvement initiatives. JAMA Surg. 2013, 148, 849–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, R.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, C.S.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.S.; et al. The consensus guideline of perioperative antiviral therapy for AIDS patients in China based on clinical practice. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023, 10, 1267236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milenković, Z.; Momčilović, S.; Ignjatovic, A.; Tasić-Otašević, S. Is Antihelminthics Necessary in Postoperative Treatment of Intraventricular Neurocysticercosis? A Systematic Review. World Neurosurgery. 2024, 181, e533–e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daskalakis, K.; Juhlin, C.; Påhlman, L. The use of pre- or postoperative antibiotics in surgery for appendicitis: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 2014, 103, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, L.F.; Kakani, P.R.; Selah, C.E. Actinomycosis. Surgical aspects. Am Surg. 1985, 51, 262–264. [Google Scholar]
- Guan, R.-Y.; Sun, B.-Y.; Wang, Z.-T.; Zhou, C.; Yang, Z.-F.; Gan, W.; et al. Antiviral therapy improves postoperative survival of patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. The American Journal of Surgery. 2022, 224, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blumenthal, K.G.; Ryan, E.E.; Li, Y.; Lee, H.; Kuhlen, J.L.; Shenoy, E.S. The Impact of a Reported Penicillin Allergy on Surgical Site Infection Risk. Clin Infect Dis. 2018, 66, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodfield, J.C.; Clifford, K.; Schmidt, B.; Turner, G.A.; Amer, M.A.; McCall, J.L. Strategies for Antibiotic Administration for Bowel Preparation Among Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2022, 157, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willis, M.A.; Toews, I.; Soltau, S.L.; Kalff, J.C.; Meerpohl, J.J.; Vilz, T.O. Preoperative combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023, 2, Cd014909. [Google Scholar]
- Berríos-Torres, S.I.; Umscheid, C.A.; Bratzler, D.W.; Leas, B.; Stone, E.C.; Kelz, R.R.; et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017, 152, 784–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lightner, D.J.; Wymer, K.; Sanchez, J.; Kavoussi, L. Best Practice Statement on Urologic Procedures and Antimicrobial Prophylaxis. J Urol. 2020, 203, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Allegranzi, B.; Bischoff, P.; de Jonge, S.; Kubilay, N.Z.; Zayed, B.; Gomes, S.M.; et al. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016, 16, e276–e87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ekanem, E.; Ngene, N.C.; Moodley, J.; Konje, J. Prevention of surgical site infection and sepsis in pregnant obese women. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023, 91, 102406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forrester, J.D.; Cai, L.Z.; Zeigler, S.; Weiser, T.G. Surgical Site Infection after Sternotomy in Low- and Middle-Human Development Index Countries: A Systematic Review. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017, 18, 774–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Worku, S.; Abebe, T.; Alemu, A.; Seyoum, B.; Swedberg, G.; Abdissa, A.; et al. Bacterial profile of surgical site infection and antimicrobial resistance patterns in Ethiopia: a multicentre prospective cross-sectional study. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2023, 22, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
