1. Introduction
In recent years, patients have become increasingly aware of their physical appearance and the critical role that maintaining optimal oral health plays in their overall well-being. This heightened awareness is largely due to the pervasive influence of mass media, evolving standards of beauty and changing social norms that emphasize the importance of aesthetics. As a result, there has been a significant increase in the demand for dental care services, not only to restore and improve the functional aspects of the stomatognathic system, but also to enhance facial harmony and smile aesthetics. The psychological and social implications of dental aesthetics are profound, as factors related to dental appearance influence social acceptance, self-image, self-esteem, and overall psychological well-being [
1,
2].
Therefore, accurate diagnosis is essential for successful aesthetic outcomes in prosthodontics, orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. One of the most effective methods of achieving this predictability is diagnostic waxing, which serves as a fundamental tool for visualizing and simulating potential prosthetic procedures. This technique allows the clinician to provide a comprehensive demonstration of expected treatment results, thereby facilitating informed patient decision making. It also plays a key role in improving communication and collaboration between the clinician and the dental technician to ensure a more accurate and predictable final prosthetic outcome [
1].
With the continued advancement and refinement of digital technologies in dentistry, digital waxing has emerged as a highly effective and practical alternative to traditional manual waxing techniques. This innovative approach significantly reduces the reliance on traditional material handling processes, thereby minimizing the risk of contamination, human error and inconsistencies in prosthetic design. In addition, digital waxing eliminates certain laboratory production steps that are often prone to inaccuracies due to material distortion, manual dexterity limitations and environmental factors. By streamlining the workflow, this technology also optimizes time efficiency by reducing the time required for both the waxing procedure itself and the transportation of physical models between the dental clinic and the laboratory, ultimately accelerating the overall treatment timeline and enhancing productivity in the clinical practice. [
1,
3].
In this context, the implementation of a fully digital workflow has the potential to revolutionize the field of fixed prosthodontics by introducing a more precise, standardized, and time-efficient approach to restorative treatment. The adoption of digital methods not only enhances workflow efficiency but also plays a crucial role in minimizing patient discomfort by reducing the number of required clinical visits and improving the accuracy of treatment planning. Furthermore, the incorporation of digital tools provides a more technologically advanced alternative to traditional techniques, aligning with modern demands for high-precision and patient-centered care [
3,
4,
5].
Beyond improving efficiency and accuracy, digital workflows provide significant advantages in diagnostic imaging, treatment predictability, and interdisciplinary coordination. Digital simulations enable precise preoperative planning, minimizing procedural errors and optimizing clinical decision-making. Moreover, digital dentistry enhances data-driven communication between patients, clinicians, and dental technicians. The integration of digital platforms facilitates seamless collaboration, ensuring prosthetic designs meet both biomechanical and aesthetic criteria, ultimately improving treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction [
1,
2].
2. Digital Technologies in Dental Medicine
Traditional articulating methods may introduce inaccuracy at each stage of the process, including impression taking, stone modelling, wax modelling and casting. In contrast, digital dental systems simplify the process and eliminates the inaccuracy from expansion/distortion of gypsum and occlusal records. In addition, digital impressions are more time-efficient than conventional techniques, easier for less experienced clinicians to use and generally more comfortable for patients. Intraoral scanning (IOS) has proven to be the preferred method over conventional impressions when used for appropriate indications [
6,
7,
8].
New digital techniques have been introduced in prosthetics (
Figure 1). These include facial scanning (FS), and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The development of a virtual three-dimensional (3D) model of a patient requires the seamless integration of data from FS, CBCT and IOS into a unified and consistent model. FS allows the integration of a virtual dental setup with a 3D model of the patient's face, enabling the assessment of how the position, color and shape of the teeth will affect the facial appearance, with these effects visible on the patient's face in real time. The potential of digital technologies such as FS and CBCT in aesthetic treatments is very promising. However, these technologies are still in the early stages of implementation in everyday clinical practice [
2,
9,
10,
11,
12].
The occlusal surfaces and overall occlusion of dental restorations play a crucial role in both static and dynamic occlusion. They should be carefully designed to facilitate proper disocclusion during protrusive and lateral excursive movements, ensuring optimal function and comfort for the patient. Using a fully digitized workflow through computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology, IOS capture highly accurate 3D data of the prepared tooth, adjacent structures and antagonistic occlusion, facilitating the virtual design of the restoration. Furthermore, crowns fabricated within a digital workflow demonstrate superior marginal adaptation, proximal contacts, occlusal precision and morphological accuracy [
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18].
Virtual facebow transfer and articulator mounting have become possible with the advent of digital technology. These advances are supported by digital data acquisition technologies, including digital photography, facial scanning, CBCT and jaw tracking systems, which facilitate the precise transfer of the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator for accurate occlusal analysis and simulation [
19,
20].
In many fields of dentistry, mainly in prosthodontics, orthodontics, and surgery, the assessment of facial soft tissues is critical. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of facial aesthetics and function are vital for thorough diagnosis and effective treatment planning. [
21,
22].
3. Artificial Intelligence in Dental Medicine
3.1. Overview of Artificial Intelligence in Dental Medicine
Artificial intelligence (AI) research originated with John McCarthy, who introduced the term at the Dartmouth Conference in 1956, symbolizing the origin of the AI scientific field. Subsequent advancements were significant, with researchers focusing on the development of automated reasoning systems, applying AI methodologies to validate mathematical theorems and solve complex algebraic computations [
23].
AI enclose computational methodologies designed to mimic human cognitive functions, including learning, reasoning, and problem-solving [
23,
24,
25]. It encompasses the development of systems capable of executing tasks that would typically require human intelligence [
26].
3.2. Machine Learning and Neural Networks in Prosthodontics
Key subdomains of AI, such as machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and artificial neural networks (ANNs), form the foundation of its advanced capabilities [
24,
27,
28].
ML utilizes algorithms to identify statistical patterns and structures within data, enabling predictive analysis on previously unseen datasets. More advanced ML techniques, particularly for data types such as images, incorporate ANNs, which consist of artificial neurons—nonlinear mathematical models designed to process complex information. These neurons are organized into multiple layers, with each layer performing mathematical operations to create a network capable of learning complex features and making sophisticated inferences [
24,
26,
27]. DL refers to neural networks with multiple layers, known as deep neural networks (DNNs). These networks can identify and represent hierarchical features in complex data. For example, in image analysis, they are often used to detect edges, corners, shapes, and larger patterns [
26].
3.3. Digital Twin Technology: AI-Driven Patient Simulations
Digital Twins in Dental Medicine refer to virtual replicas of physical systems, created using three-dimensional (3D) data such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, intraoral scans, and digital models. In dentistry, digital twins enable the simulation and analysis of dental and functional structures in a virtual environment, supporting diagnosis, personalized treatment planning, patient education, and even virtual surgical procedures [
29,
30].
This technology replaces traditional plaster models, which are prone to degradation, loss, and storage challenges. Digital models provide more accurate, accessible, and transferable representations, enhancing clinical workflows. Digital twins also facilitate real-time monitoring, outcome prediction, and dynamic adjustments through the integration of evolving datasets and predictive algorithms. This convergence of physical and digital worlds allows for a deeper understanding of complex dental systems and improved decision-making [
28,
30].
Although the application of digital twins in dentistry remains in its early stages, it holds significant potential for transforming dental care through personalized, data-driven approaches. Future developments are expected to address current challenges such as standardization of protocols, high implementation costs, and the management of large data volumes, establishing digital twins as a cornerstone of advanced dental practice [
28,
31].
3.3. Future Directions in AI for Dental Medicine
In the field of dentistry, AI-driven software systems have been developed for a wide range of clinical and diagnostic applications, including caries and oral lesion detection, dental plaque identification, periodontal disease diagnosis, automated design of dental prostheses and restorations, and cephalometric analysis [
24,
27]
The primary goal of AI-based systems is to provide accurate and reliable results for specific tasks, such as detecting pathological conditions or identifying anatomical structures. These advancements have the potential to significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy, treatment efficiency, and workflow optimization in dentistry. However, the ultimate responsibility for diagnosis and treatment remains with dental practitioners, who must rely on their clinical acumen and expertise, whether AI assistance is utilized. The adoption of AI technologies necessitates the establishment of robust regulatory frameworks and guidelines by scientific and professional organizations to ensure their safe, ethical, and effective integration into dental practice [
24,
26].
Advanced digital data acquisition technologies, including facial scans, intraoral scans, photogrammetry, CBCT, and jaw tracking systems, enable precise and comprehensive capture of patient-specific anatomical structures. The integration of these multimodal datasets facilitates the generation of a 3D virtual patient or a fully detailed digital patient replica. This virtual model serves as a critical resource in advanced clinical workflows, supporting applications such as facial diagnostic waxing, precise implant treatment planning, and the design and fabrication of implant-supported prosthetic restorations [
10,
22,
24].
4. Virtual Articulators: Principles and Functions
4.1. Comparison Between Virtual and Analogue Articulators
The dental articulator is defined as a mechanical device that mimics the temporomandibular joints and jaws, to which upper and lower dental casts can be attached to replicate some or all the movements of the mandible. In the patient's absence, the articulator can be programmed with patient-specific data, enabling the clinician to design a restoration that precisely fits the individual’s chewing function. [
32,
33].
Articulators, both analogue and virtual, remain indispensable instruments in the diagnosis and management of occlusal dysfunction, capable of simulate the jaw movements [
34,
35].
Articulators have come a long way since their early beginnings in the 18th century, when Phillip Pfaff is credited with introducing the first basic model. Today, they have evolved into highly sophisticated tools with adjustable features. With the rise of digital technology and the move toward fully digital workflows in dentistry, mechanical articulators have been gradually replaced or complemented by virtual articulators, reflecting this shift in the dental profession [
35].
Nevertheless, they exhibit inherent limitations, including the approximation of the hinge axis position and the oversimplification of mandibular movements to a unidimensional rotational arc of closure and linear excursive pathways. Despite these limitations, articulators are integral to clinical workflows, providing reliable insights and facilitating efficient treatment protocols [
34].
4.2. Functionality and Mechanisms of Virtual Articulators
Virtual articulators have been introduced to design restorations with dynamic adjustments and should be considered as an additional diagnostic and treatment plan [
20,
36,
36,
37,
38].
Virtual reality, rooted in advanced electronic and computational technologies, has become an integral component of modern dental practice. The virtual articulator (VA) exemplifies the application of this technology in restorative and prosthetic dentistry, significantly mitigating the limitations of conventional physical articulators [
32]. The main indications for virtual articulators are personalized diagnostics and the avoidance of typical problems associated with conventional articulators, such as the formation of new occlusal contacts, deformation of materials, errors in the alignment and positioning of dental casts, and challenges in accurately reproducing patient data in 3D [
36,
37].
The fundamental components common to all VAs involve the acquisition and transfer of the dental arches into the virtual environment, followed by the articulation of the digital models. This process includes capturing a digital impression of the dental arches, recording the static occlusal relationship and dynamic mandibular movements during excursive paths, transferring the maxillary position in relation to the craniofacial structure, and finally mounting the digital models onto the virtual articulator for articulation [
37]
The first software to integrate VA was DentCam (Kavo; Hamburg, Germany). It included a device designed to capture mandibular movements and reproduce them as an animation. The incorporation of patient-specific data into the DentCam software allowed clinicians to visualize and assess both static and dynamic occlusal contacts during mandibular kinematics, enabling detailed analysis of occlusal behavior throughout functional movements.[
37]
By employing sophisticated data acquisition and modeling techniques, virtual articulators enable precise analysis of static and dynamic occlusal relationships, as well as detailed evaluation of the patient's maxillomandibular relationship. These software systems utilize virtual reality technology to optimize diagnostic precision and improve therapeutic outcomes in contemporary dental workflows [
32].
4.3. Technological Software and Platforms
These virtual articulators are present in most dental CAD software, such as Exocad, 3Shape, CEREC, Zirkonzahn, which operate on the same principles as traditional mechanical articulators [
38].
4.3.1. Programming a Virtual Articulator
It is common practice to position digital models on virtual articulators that are pre-configured with normative data and standardized articulator parameters, which can lead to design errors [
13].
There are two possibilities for using the virtual articulator: to set up the models with the program's default and average values (mathematically simulated) or in a completely adjustable way for each individual [
32,
37,
39,
40].
Once programmed for each individual, virtual articulators can accurately reproduce mandibular trajectories [
37,
39,
40]. Therefore, the main disadvantage of using the virtual articulator with the average is that it does not simulate individualized mandibular movements accurate enough. However, it may be more user-friendly and less expensive [
37].
Several techniques have been proposed for programming a virtual articulator [
38,
41,
42,
43]. It is possible to use a virtual facebow to align the 3D FS with the IOS in a CAD/CAM system and position the digital maxillary model in a virtual articulator to match the facial landmarks [
38,
43,
44]. CBCT can also be used to determine the condylar guidance angles and assist in a virtual articulator in a CAD/CAD system [
45,
46,
47]. Condylar guidance refers to the movement of the mandible guided by the condyle and articular disc as they move along the articular eminence [
48], and sagittal condylar inclination is a crucial parameter in oral rehabilitation, defined as the angle formed between the protrusive condylar path and the Frankfort plane [
38,
49,
50,
51,
52,
53]. Thus, the combination digital data on condylar movements with individual reference planes can help optimize the functional adaptation of prosthetic components [
49].
In this regard, software capable of recording protrusive and laterotrusive movements guided by teeth could provide data to design the morphology of occlusal surfaces in restorations, thereby eliminating occlusal interference and ensuring occlusal surfaces that are in harmony with the masticatory muscles [
13,
54]. There are programs and devices (optical jaw tracking systems) that can record mandibular movements, such as TRIOS, 3Shape and Modjaw® [
49,
55]. The TRIOS 3 and TRIOS 4 (3Shape A/S) IOS have the patient-specific motion (PSM) feature, which captures dynamic occlusion in addition to 3D bite data [
55,
56]. The Modjaw® captures the movements of the patient's hinge axis during functional mandibular actions and transfers this data, along with the patient-specific reference plane, to the CAD/CAM software [
19,
24,
49].
5. Challenges and Limitations
Recent studies indicate that research on the accuracy and reproducibility of maxillary cast transfers using FS and CBCT remains insufficiently explored. While these digital acquisition techniques provide high-resolution 3D data of craniofacial structures, their ability to precisely replicate maxillary spatial positioning within a virtual articulator environment has not yet been fully validated. Challenges such as data resolution variability, segmentation errors, and inconsistencies in landmark identification can lead to registration inaccuracies, which may compromise occlusal analysis and treatment predictability. The accuracy of virtual maxillary cast transfers is crucial for maintaining correct occlusal vertical dimension, intermaxillary relationships, and functional articulation, necessitating further controlled clinical to assess and optimize these methodologies [
19,
57].
In addition, the alignment of a patient's digital files using CAD software can introduce distortions into the digital process. A critical challenge in digital prosthodontics and occlusion analysis is the integration and superimposition of multiple digital datasets from IOS, FS systems, and CBCT imaging within CAD software. The alignment of these datasets depends on the precision of surface-matching algorithms, which must accurately synchronize anatomical landmarks while minimizing distortions due to interpolation, or image segmentation errors [
24,
57,
58,
59,
60]. Even minor deviations in landmark registration can result in discrepancies in occlusal positioning, condylar guidance simulation errors, and inaccuracies in the articulation of prosthetic components. These limitations highlight the need for advanced computational models, machine learning-based error correction, and enhanced AI-driven data fusion techniques to refine the accuracy and stability of digital maxillary cast positioning. It is therefore essential that future research prioritize the development of standardized calibration protocols, improved algorithmic precision for automated data superimposition, and enhanced deep learning frameworks. The ultimate goal is to integrate different patient data seamlessly, allowing virtual articulators to accurately replicate mandibular movements and occlusal function. Overcoming these challenges will help digital prosthodontics and occlusion diagnostics become more precise, efficient, and clinically reliable, improving treatment accuracy and long-term prosthetic success [
24,
57,
58,
59].
6. Future Directions in Virtual Articulator Technology
6.1. Virtual Articulators for Multidisciplinary Integration
The digital implementation of virtual articulators has great potential and should be further developed to enhance its use in multidisciplinary cases. These cases often require the collection of large amounts of information from multiple sources, such as dental arches, occlusion, and soft and hard tissues, and the integration of all this data into a unified planning model [
33]. The ability to simulate mandibular movements with high precision is crucial for ensuring accurate diagnoses and treatment planning, particularly in complex cases involving prosthodontics, orthodontics, and maxillofacial surgery [
32].
Advancements in computational modeling and artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to further refine the accuracy and predictive capabilities of virtual articulators. By incorporating machine learning algorithms, these systems could analyze patient-specific data to provide real-time adaptive simulations, improving diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes. Additionally, cloud-based storage and interoperability with other digital tools, such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanning, would enable seamless data integration across disciplines [
37,
61].
Virtual articulators have the potential to become a regular part of everyday clinical practice in the future. However, additional clinical studies are required to confirm their precision and their clinical application. Continued validation of these technologies through evidence-based research is essential to establish standardized protocols and regulatory approval for widespread clinical adoption [
37,
51].
6.2. Digital Dentistry in Sustainable Clinical Practices
Sustainability in dental medicine has gained increasing attention due to the environmental impact of traditional clinical and laboratory practices, which often involve high levels of material waste, energy consumption, and transportation-related carbon emissions [
56]. The shift toward digital workflows in modern dental practice has emerged as a transformative approach to addressing these sustainability challenges. By integrating advanced digital technologies, such as computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM), intraoral scanning, and 3D printing, dental professionals can significantly reduce reliance on disposable materials, optimize resource utilization, and decrease the ecological footprint associated with manufacturing and transport processes. These innovations not only enhance clinical efficiency but also contribute to more environmentally responsible practices within the field of dentistry [
3,
62].
One of the most notable environmental concerns in traditional dentistry is the excessive waste generated by conventional impression-taking techniques. Traditional methods rely on disposable materials such as alginates, silicones, and gypsum-based stone models, which require frequent replacement and disposal after single use. These materials contribute to clinical waste accumulation, as they are non-biodegradable and cannot be easily recycled. Furthermore, the processing of stone models requires large amounts of water and generates dust and debris, further exacerbating environmental concerns [
3,
63,
64]
Intraoral scanning has emerged as a sustainable alternative, as it eliminates the need for physical impressions by creating a precise, digital representation of the patient's dentition [
64]. This transition not only reduces material consumption but also enhances accuracy and patient comfort while minimizing procedural errors that may lead to retakes and additional waste production [
3,
62,
64].
Additionally, CAD/CAM technology and 3D printing have introduced highly efficient and sustainable manufacturing processes for prosthetic and restorative dentistry. Traditional fabrication methods involve multiple manual steps, including casting, waxing, and layering, which can result in substantial material wastage due to trimming, remakes, and adjustments. Digital manufacturing, on the other hand, optimizes material usage by producing highly precise restorations with minimal excess, ensuring that only the necessary amount of material is utilized. Additive manufacturing techniques, such as 3D printing, further contribute to sustainability, as they create structures layer by layer, reducing the amount of discarded material compared to subtractive milling methods [
3,
62,
65].
The environmental benefits of digital workflows extend beyond material conservation to include energy efficiency and reduction of carbon emissions. Traditional dental workflows require frequent transportation of physical impressions, models, and prosthetic components between clinics and laboratories, contributing to fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions [
66]. By replacing these physical transfers with digital transmission of intraoral scans and CAD files, clinics can significantly lower their carbon footprint while streamlining communication with laboratories. This not only enhances the speed and efficiency of the fabrication process but also reduces logistical costs and delays associated with transportation [
62,
66,
67].
As the dental industry continues to embrace technological advancements, the role of sustainability in digital dentistry will become increasingly significant. The adoption of eco-friendly materials, energy-efficient machinery, and improved recycling programs for electronic waste will be essential for maximizing the environmental benefits of digital workflows. By integrating these solutions into daily clinical practice, digital dentistry represents a promising pathway toward a more sustainable, efficient, and environmentally responsible approach to patient care [
62,
66].
7. Conclusions
The integration of virtual articulators into digital workflows has significant clinical implications in prosthodontics, orthodontics and orthognathic treatments. By enabling more accurate transfer of maxillary casts and occlusal relationships, VAs increase diagnostic accuracy and treatment predictability, improving both functional and aesthetic outcomes.
From a clinical perspective, the use of digital techniques such as intraoral scanning, facial scanning and cone beam computed tomography minimizes the errors associated with conventional methods and reduces the risk of discrepancies in prosthetic fabrication and occlusal adjustments. In addition, VAs facilitate better communication between clinicians, technicians and patients by providing a comprehensive virtual representation of the treatment plan.
However, challenges remain regarding the accuracy of digital maxillary cast transfers, standardization of data integration methods, and validation of condylar motion simulations. Further research is needed to refine these processes and ensure that VA can be reliably incorporated into daily clinical practice. As digital dentistry continues to advance, VAs have the potential to become a standard tool to optimize treatment workflows and improve patient care. Continued clinical validation is essential to fully establish their accuracy, reproducibility and practical benefits in everyday practice.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.L.; J.B. and J.R.; validation, J.B.; J.R., I.A., V.M. and J.L.; formal analysis J.B.; J.R., I.A. and J.L.; resources, J.J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L.; writing—review and editing, J.B.; J.R., V.M. and I.A.; supervision, J.B and J.L.; project administration, J.B. and J.J.M.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript: 3D - Three Dimensional; AI - Artificial Intelligence; ANNs - Artificial Neural Networks; CAD-CAM - Computer-aided Design and Computer-aided Manufacturing; CBCT - Cone Beam Computed Tomography; DL - Deep Learning; DNNs - Deep Neural Networks; FS - Facial Scan; IOS - Intraoral Scan; ML - Machine Learning; VA - Virtual Articulator.
References
- Abduo, J.; Bennamoun, M.; Tennant, M.; McGeachie, J. Impact of Digital Prosthodontic Planning on Dental Esthetics: Biometric Analysis of Esthetic Parameters. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2016, 115, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perroti, G.; Goker, F.; Rossi, O.; Nowakowska, J.; Russillo, A.; Beltramini, G.; Tartaglia, G.M.; Testiru, T.; Del Fabbro, M.; Mortellaro, C. 3D Computed Tomography vs. 2D Radiography: Comparison of 3D Direct Anthropometry with 2D Norm Calculations and Analysis of Differences in Soft Tissue Measurements. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2023, 27, 46–60.
- Chochlidakis, K.M.; Papaspyridakos, P.; Geminiani, A.; Chen, C.-J.; Feng, I.J.; Ercoli, C. Digital versus Conventional Impressions for Fixed Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2016, 116, 184–190e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Joda, T.; Bragger, U.; Gallucci, G. Systematic Literature Review of Digital Three-Dimensional Superimposition Techniques to Create Virtual Dental Patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015, 30, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joda, T.; Zarone, F.; Ferrari, M. The Complete Digital Workflow in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review. BMC Oral Health 2017, 17, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schlenz, M.A.; Klaus, K.; Schmidt, A.; Wöstmann, B.; Mersmann, M.; Ruf, S.; Bock, N.C. The Transfer Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions Influenced by Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Reference Aid–Based in Vitro Study. Clin Oral Invest 2022, 27, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahlholm, P.; Sipilä, K.; Vallittu, P.; Jakonen, M.; Kotiranta, U. Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review. Journal of Prosthodontics 2018, 27, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burzynski, J.A.; Firestone, A.R.; Beck, F.M.; Fields, H.W.; Deguchi, T. Comparison of Digital Intraoral Scanners and Alginate Impressions: Time and Patient Satisfaction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2018, 153, 534–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mai, H.Y.; Choi, Y.-D.; Lee, D.-H. Digital Approach Integrating 3D Facial Scan and a Virtual Mockup for Esthetic Restorative Treatment: A Case Report. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2019, 57, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mangano, C.; Luongo, F.; Migliario, M.; Mortellaro, C.; Mangano, F.G. Combining Intraoral Scans, Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Face Scans: The Virtual Patient. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2018, 29, 2241–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saad, S.A.; Shalaby, Y.A.; Azer, A.S. Reliability of the Digital Functionally Generated Path Technique for Assessing Occlusal Interferences and Adjusting CAD-CAM Zirconia Crowns: An in Vivo Study. BMC Oral Health 2024, 24, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inoue, N.; Scialabba, R.; Lee, J.D.; Lee, S.J. A Comparison of Virtually Mounted Dental Casts from Traditional Facebow Records, Average Values, and 3D Facial Scans. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2024, 131, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, L.; Chen, H.; Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Y. Design of Wear Facets of Mandibular First Molar Crowns by Using Patient-Specific Motion with an Intraoral Scanner: A Clinical Study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2023, 129, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berrendero, S.; Salido, M.P.; Ferreiroa, A.; Valverde, A.; Pradíes, G. Comparative Study of All-Ceramic Crowns Obtained from Conventional and Digital Impressions: Clinical Findings. Clin Oral Invest 2019, 23, 1745–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carrilho Baltazar Vaz, I.M.; Pimentel Coelho Lino Carracho, J.F. Marginal Fit of Zirconia Copings Fabricated after Conventional Impression Making and Digital Scanning: An in Vitro Study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2020, 124, 223.e1–223e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabesh, M.; Nejatidanesh, F.; Savabi, G.; Davoudi, A.; Savabi, O.; Mirmohammadi, H. Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Complete-Coverage Fixed Dental Restorations Made from Digital Scans or Conventional Impressions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2021, 125, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, S.; Wu, L.; Alabkaa, B.; Lepidi, L.; Yue, L.; Li, J. Intraoral Scanner-based Virtual Facebow Transferring: A Chairside Dental Technique. Journal of Prosthodontics 2024, jopr.13897. [CrossRef]
- Úry, E.; Fornai, C.; Weber, G.W. Accuracy of Transferring Analog Dental Casts to a Virtual Articulator. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2020, 123, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Revilla-León, M.; Zeitler, J.M.; Kois, J.C. An Overview of the Different Digital Facebow Methods for Transferring the Maxillary Cast into the Virtual Articulator. J Esthet Restor Dent 2024, jerd.13264. [CrossRef]
- Park, J.H.; Lee, G.-H.; Moon, D.-N.; Kim, J.-C.; Park, M.; Lee, K.-M. A Digital Approach to the Evaluation of Mandibular Position by Using a Virtual Articulator. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2021, 125, 849–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cascos, R.; Ortiz Del Amo, L.; Álvarez-Guzmán, F.; Antonaya-Martín, J.L.; Celemín-Viñuela, A.; Gómez-Costa, D.; Zafra-Vallejo, M.; Agustín-Panadero, R.; Gómez-Polo, M. Accuracy between 2D Photography and Dual-Structured Light 3D Facial Scanner for Facial Anthropometry: A Clinical Study. JCM 2023, 12, 3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piedra-Cascón, W.; Meyer, M.J.; Methani, M.M.; Revilla-León, M. Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of a Dual-Structured Light Facial Scanner and Interexaminer Reliability. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2020, 124, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Liu, X.; Cao, X.; Huang, C.; Liu, E.; Qian, S.; Liu, X.; Wu, Y.; Dong, F.; Qiu, C.-W.; et al. Artificial Intelligence: A Powerful Paradigm for Scientific Research. The Innovation 2021, 2, 100179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revilla-León, M.; Gómez-Polo, M.; Sailer, I.; Kois, J.C.; Rokhshad, R. An Overview of Artificial Intelligence Based Applications for Assisting Digital Data Acquisition and Implant Planning Procedures. J Esthet Restor Dent 2024, 36, 1666–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Revilla-León, M.; Gómez-Polo, M.; Vyas, S.; Barmak, A.B.; Özcan, M.; Att, W.; Krishnamurthy, V.R. Artificial Intelligence Applications in Restorative Dentistry: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2022, 128, 867–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hung, K.F.; Yeung, A.W.K.; Bornstein, M.M.; Schwendicke, F. Personalized Dental Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, and Their Relevance for Dentomaxillofacial Imaging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2023, 52, 20220335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kois, J.C.; Zeitler, J.M.; Barmak, A.B.; Yilmaz, B.; Gómez-Polo, M.; Revilla-León, M. Discrepancies in the Occlusal Devices Designed by an Experienced Dental Laboratory Technician and by 2 Artificial Intelligence-Based Automatic Programs. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2023, S0022391323005516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saghiri, M.A.; Vakhnovetsky, J.; Samadi, E.; Amanabi, M.; Morgano, S.M. C.E. Credit. Innovating Dental Education with Artificial Intelligence. Journal of the California Dental Association 2023, 51, 2217692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, R.-Y.; Byun, S.-H.; Yi, S.-M.; Ahn, H.-J.; Nam, Y.-S.; Park, I.-Y.; On, S.-W.; Kim, J.-C.; Yang, B.-E. Comparative Analysis of Three Facial Scanners for Creating Digital Twins by Focusing on the Difference in Scanning Method. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.-H.; Lee, H.-L.; Park, I.-Y.; On, S.-W.; Byun, S.-H.; Yang, B.-E. Effectiveness of Creating Digital Twins with Different Digital Dentition Models and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Sci Rep 2023, 13, 10603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saghiri, M.A.; Vakhnovetsky, J.; Saghiri, A.M. The Future of Digital Twins in Precision Dentistry. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research 2023, 13, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doshi, K.; Sathe, S.; Dubey, S.; Bhoyar, A.; Dhamande, M.; Jaiswal, T. A Comprehensive Review on Virtual Articulators. Cureus 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain R, Ashish. ; Md.Acu, V. Articulators through the Years Revisited: From 1971-1990. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2016, 7. [CrossRef]
- Anes, L.; Cardoso, J.A.; Azevedo, L.; Oliveira, K.; Maligno, F. Mounting Digital Casts on a Virtual Articulator by Using Two-Dimensional Facial Photographs with a Facebow: A Technique. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2024, S0022391324000659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maheshwari, K.; Gupta, A.K.; Tiwari, B. A Newly Proposed Classification for Articulators-Integrating Virtual with Conventional. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 2024, 24, 212–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.; Pan, Y.; Wei, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, H.; Cheng, H. Comparison of the Performance of Various Virtual Articulator Mounting Procedures: A Self-Controlled Clinical Study. Clin Oral Invest 2023, 27, 4017–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lepidi, L.; Galli, M.; Mastrangelo, F.; Venezia, P.; Joda, T.; Wang, H.; Li, J. Virtual Articulators and Virtual Mounting Procedures: Where Do We Stand? Journal of Prosthodontics 2021, 30, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lepidi, L.; Chen, Z.; Ravida, A.; Lan, T.; Wang, H.; Li, J. A Full-Digital Technique to Mount a Maxillary Arch Scan on a Virtual Articulator. Journal of Prosthodontics 2019, 28, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Shao, L.; Sun, J.; Wang, S.; Ding, Q.; Zhang, L. A Fully Digital Workflow to Design Anterior Guidance for an Implant-Supported Single Crown Using a Modified Patient-Specific Motion Technique. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2024, S0022391324001343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.-E.; Park, J.-H.; Moon, H.-S.; Shim, J.-S. Complete Assessment of Occlusal Dynamics and Establishment of a Digital Workflow by Using Target Tracking with a Three-Dimensional Facial Scanner. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2019, 63, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, W.Y.H.; Hsung, R.T.C.; Choi, W.W.S.; Luk, H.W.K.; Cheng, L.Y.Y.; Pow, E.H.N. A Clinical Technique for Virtual Articulator Mounting with Natural Head Position by Using Calibrated Stereophotogrammetry. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2018, 119, 902–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lam, W.Y.H.; Hsung, R.T.C.; Choi, W.W.S.; Luk, H.W.K.; Pow, E.H.N. A 2-Part Facebow for CAD-CAM Dentistry. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2016, 116, 843–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solaberrieta, E.; Mínguez, R.; Barrenetxea, L.; Etxaniz, O. Direct Transfer of the Position of Digitized Casts to a Virtual Articulator. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2013, 109, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, S.-J.; Noh, K. Setting the Sagittal Condylar Inclination on a Virtual Articulator by Using a Facial and Intraoral Scan of the Protrusive Interocclusal Position: A Dental Technique. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2021, 125, 392–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lassmann, Ł.; Nowak, Z.; Żółtowska, A. Sagittal Condylar Guidance Angle Measurement Methods: A Systematic Review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2024, 132, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Palaskar, J.N.; Joshi, N.P.; Hindocha, A.D.; Gunjal, A.P.; Balsaraf, K.D. Evaluation of Sagittal Inclination of Occlusal Plane and Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Various Anterior Reference Points on Arcon and Nonarcon Articulators. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2022, 13, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, A.; Muddugangadhar, B.C.; Mawani, D.P.; Mukhopadhyay, A. Comparative Evaluation of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Obtained from a Clinical Method and with Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Dentate Individuals. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2021, 125, 753–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mawani, D.; Muddugangadhar, B.; Das, A.; Mukhopadhyay, A. Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Inclination in Dentulous Subjects as Determined by Two Radiographic Methods: Orthopantomograph and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography – An in Vivo Study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2019, 19, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bapelle, M.; Dubromez, J.; Savoldelli, C.; Tillier, Y.; Ehrmann, E. Modjaw® Device: Analysis of Mandibular Kinematics Recorded for a Group of Asymptomatic Subjects. CRANIO® 2024, 42, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hong, S.; Choi, Y.; Park, M.; Paek, J.; Pae, A.; Kim, H.; Kwon, K.; Noh, K. Setting the Sagittal Condylar Inclination on a Virtual Articulator Using Intraoral Scan of Protrusive Interocclusal Position and Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Journal of Prosthodontics 2020, 29, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Liu, F.; Mei, J.; Chao, J.; Wang, Z.; Shen, J. A Comparative Study to Measure the Sagittal Condylar Inclination Using Mechanical Articulator, Virtual Articulator and Jaw Tracking Device. J Adv Prosthodont 2023, 15, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reicheneder, C.; Gedrange, T.; Baumert, U.; Faltermeier, A.; Proff, P. Variations in the Inclination of the Condylar Path in Children and Adults. The Angle Orthodontist 2009, 79, 958–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cimić, S.; Simunković, S.K. ; Suncana Simonić Kocijan, null; Matijević, J. ; Dulcić, N.; Catić, A. ARTICULATOR-RELATED REGISTRATION AND ANALYSIS OF SAGITTAL CONDYLAR INCLINATION. Acta Clin Croat 2015, 54, 432–437. [Google Scholar]
- Lauren, M.; McIntyre, F. 4D Clinical Imaging for Dynamic CAD. International Journal of Dentistry 2013, 2013, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.-C.; Lee, C.; Shim, J.-S.; Park, J.-M.; Shin, Y.; Kim, J.-E.; Lee, K.-W. Comparison between Occlusal Errors of Single Posterior Crowns Adjusted Using Patient Specific Motion or Conventional Methods. Applied Sciences 2020, 10, 9140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valenti, M.; Schmitz, J.H. A Reverse Digital Workflow by Using an Interim Restoration Scan and Patient-Specific Motion with an Intraoral Scanner. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2021, 126, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revilla-León, M.; Agustín-Panadero, R.; Zeitler, J.M.; Barmak, A.B.; Yilmaz, B.; Kois, J.C.; Pérez-Barquero, J.A. Differences in Maxillomandibular Relationship Recorded at Centric Relation When Using a Conventional Method, Four Intraoral Scanners, and a Jaw Tracking System: A Clinical Study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2023, 132, 964–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revilla-León, M.; Pérez-Barquero, J.A.; Barmak, B.A.; Agustín-Panadero, R.; Fernández-Estevan, L.; Att, W. Facial Scanning Accuracy Depending on the Alignment Algorithm and Digitized Surface Area Location: An in Vitro Study. Journal of Dentistry 2021, 110, 103680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tomar, S.S.; Rathee, M.; Diwan, K.; Senthilvelpalani, B. Unconventional Digital Dentures: Overcoming Software Challenges and Integrating Digital Workflows into Conventional Techniques. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2024, 132, 1103.e1–1103e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watanabe, H.; Fellows, C.; An, H. Digital Technologies for Restorative Dentistry. Dental Clinics of North America 2022, 66, 567–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koralakunte, P.R. The Role of Virtual Articulator in Prosthetic and Restorative Dentistry. JCDR 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hegedus, T.; Kreuter, P.; Kismarczi-Antalffy, A.A.; Demeter, T.; Banyai, D.; Vegh, A.; Geczi, Z.; Hermann, P.; Payer, M.; Zsembery, A.; et al. User Experience and Sustainability of 3D Printing in Dentistry. IJERPH 2022, 19, 1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khanna, R.; Konyukhov, Y.; Maslennikov, N.; Kolesnikov, E.; Burmistrov, I. An Overview of Dental Solid Waste Management and Associated Environmental Impacts: A Materials Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naderi, R.K.; Patel, T.J.; Thompson, M.A. A Comparison Study: The Use of Digital and Conventional Impression Techniques in Dental Hygiene Education. Journal of Dental Education 2024, 88, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahmood, M.; Ijaz, M. Advances in CADCAM Technology for Chairside Restorative Dentistry- A Workflow Analysis. Journal of dental care 2024, 1, 86–99. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Y.; Juang, J.; Durham, E.; Fayyad, R.; Hackley, D. Assessing the Travel Carbon Footprint of Faculty, Students, and Staff at a U. S. Dental School. Journal of the California Dental Association 2024, 52, 2424349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, L.-P.; Huang, Y.-K.; Chang, Y.-C. The Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry Could Enhance Environmental Sustainability. Journal of Dental Sciences 2022, 17, 1081–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).