Submitted:
23 February 2025
Posted:
24 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
Introduction
Literature review
Process of Framework modification and development
Framework for Digital Pedagogical Skills of Teachers
Details of the components of framework with their implications
Internet surfing and communication tools
Internet surfing
Video conferencing tools
Chat and discussion board
Collaboration Platform
Learning and sharing tools
Web Blogs
Resource sharing tools
Online course platforms
Classroom interaction tools
Data/result analysis tools
Qualitative data analysis tools
Quantitative data analysis tools
Subject Related Application
Digital games and puzzles
Course management and evaluation tools
Learning Management System (LMS) tool
Survey/evaluation tool
Reference and digital library tool
Audio and visual document development tools
Video and audio editing tools
Screen recording
Writing and presentation tools
Digital notebook
Presentation tools
Calendar-Timetable
Writing tools
Digital boards
Artificial intelligence tool
Content Management
Proof Readers
Document Surfing
Ethical awareness
Policy awareness
Discussion
Conclusion
References
- AlAfnan, M. A., Dishari, S., Jovic, M., & Lomidze, K. (2023). ChatGpt as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60-68.
- Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murphy, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack, M., Pomerantz, J., Seilhamer, R., & Weber, N. (2019). EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition. EDUCAUSE.
- Ausawasowan, A., Adipat, S., Laksana, K., Busayanon, K., Pakapol, P., & Mahamarn, Y. (2021). Responsible digital citizenship: Safe and respectful Online community life. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 6(7), 2564.
- Barajas, M., & Frossard, F. (2019). DoCENT-digital creativity enhanced in teacher education: Framework of digital creative teaching competences. https://tinyurl.com/34ptskzm.
- Bostrom, N. (2017). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press, Cop.
- Bourgeois, A., Birch, P., & Davydovskaia, O. (2019). Eurydice Brief: Digital Education at School in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. [CrossRef]
- Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens With eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. [CrossRef]
- Catalunya, G. de. (2015). Core competencies in the digital field: Identification and implementation in compulsory secondary education. https://tinyurl.com/5bcky5t8.
- Dockendorff, M., & Zaccarelli, F. G. (2024). Successfully preparing future mathematics teachers for digital technology integration: a literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–32. [CrossRef]
- DoEL. (2015). Green Paper: Digital Literacy.
- Dore, L., Geragthy, A., & Riordan, G. O. (2015). Towards a National Digital Skills Framework for Irish Higher Education.
- DQ Institute. (2017). Digital Intelligence (DQ): A conceptual framework and methodology for teaching and Measuring digital Citizenship. https://tinyurl.com/42mty4j5.
- Entz, S. (2006). Why Pedagogy Matters: The Importance of Teaching in a Standards-Based Environment. Forum on Public Policy Online, 1–25.
- ETF. (2018). Digital Teaching Professional Framework: Full reference guide. https://tinyurl.com/57db43ut.
- European Commission. (2018). Developing digital youth work: Policy recommendations, training needs and good practice examples. European Union.
- European Union. (2019). Report on analysis of EU Digital competence framework for citizens and for educators; UNDC report. https://dcomfra.vdu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Report_WP-1_3_EN.pdf.
- GoQ. (2019). Digital competency framework. Minister of Education and Higher Education, Gouvernement du Quebec. https://tinyurl.com/5y9nw53u.
- Hamiti, M., Reka, B., & Baloghova, A. (2014). Ethical use of information technology in high education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4411–4415. [CrossRef]
- Hirschman, K., & Wood, B. E. (2018). 21st Century Learners: Changing Conceptions of Knowledge, Learning and the Child. The New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 23, 20–35. [CrossRef]
- Hoq, K. M. G. (2012). Information ethics and its implications for library and information professionals: A contemporary analysis. Philosophy and Progress, 38–48. [CrossRef]
- ITU. (2018). Digital Skills Toolkit. International Telecommunication Union. https://tinyurl.com/27w6jh53.
- ITU. (2021). Digital Skills Insights 2021. International Telecommunication Union. https://tinyurl.com/y58j5kj8.
- Joshi, D. R., Neupane, U., & Joshi, P. R. (2021). Synthesis review of digital frameworks and DEPSWALIC digital competency framework for teachers from basic to university level. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 13(2), 108-136. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1383146.pdf.
- Joshi, D. R., Khanal, J., Chapai, K. P. S., & Adhikari, K. P. (2025). The impact of digital resource utilization on student learning outcomes and self-efficacy across different economic contexts: A comparative analysis of PISA, 2022. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 8(September 2024), 100443. [CrossRef]
- Joshi, D. R., Khanal, J., & Dhakal, R. H. (2023). Resistance to resilience: Teachers’ adaptation process to mediating digital devices in pre-COVID-19, during COVID-19, and post-COVID-19 classrooms in Nepal. Education Sciences, 13(5), 1–18. [CrossRef]
- Joynes, C., Rossignoli, S., & Amonoo-Kuofi, E. F. (2019). 21st Century Skills: Evidence of Issues in Definition, Demand and Delivery for Development Contexts.
- Kelentric, M., Helland, K., & Arstorp, A.-T. (2017). Professional digital competence framework for teachers. The Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education. https://tinyurl.com/yc6djree.
- Khanal, B., Belbase, S., & Joshi, D. R. (2021). Effect of digital awareness on mathematics achievements at school to university levels in Nepal. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 12(4), 47–68. https://tinyurl.com/2pv5kywk.
- Kiryakova, G., & Kozhuharova, D. (2024). The Digital competences necessary for the successful pedagogical practice of teachers in the digital age. Education Sciences, 14(5), 507. [CrossRef]
- Kovshikova, E. V., Shindryaeva, I. V., Gulyaeva, E. V., & Ogarkov, A. A. (2019). Pedagogical components of professional activity of university professors: Complex analysis. V International Forum on Teacher Education, 1, 363–371. [CrossRef]
- Loan, F. A. (2012). Impact of the Internet surfing on reading practices and choices. Webology, 9(1), 1-10.
- LLLP. (2019). 21st Century Learning Environments. [CrossRef]
- Mancini, F., & O'Reilly, M. (2013). New technology and the prevention of violence and conflict. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, 2(3), 1–9. [CrossRef]
- Martin, B. (2010). Technology, violence, and peace. Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, and Conflict, 3, 2044–2055. [CrossRef]
- Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249–267. [CrossRef]
- McGarr, O., & McDonagh, A. (2019). Digital Competence in Teacher Education.
- Microsoft. (2017). Road to 21st Century Competences: Evaluation framework for transversal competences in the Finnis curriculum. Microsoft Claned.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
- Mitra, A. (2010). Digital security: cyber terror and cyber security. Infobase Publishing. [CrossRef]
- Nárosy, T., Schmölz, A., Proinger, J., & Domany-Funtan, U. (2022). Digital competence framework for Austria: DigComp 2.3 AT (2022). https://www.fit4internet.at/view/verstehen-das-modell/&lang=EN.
- NIoET. (2017). Common digital competence framework for teachers. https://tinyurl.com/3wx37n7r.
- Ontario. (2016). 21 Century Competencies: Foundation Document for Discussion.
- Poortman, C. L., Brown, C., & Schildkamp, K. (2021). Professional learning networks: a conceptual model and research opportunities. Educational Research, 64(1), 95–112. [CrossRef]
- Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, Technology and Education.
- Rahman, M. H. A., Yahaya, N., & Halim, N. D. A. (2014). Virtual world for collaborative learning: A review. Proceedings - 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering, LATICE 2014, October, 52–57. [CrossRef]
- Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators. [CrossRef]
- Reinhart, J., & Robinson, R. (2014). Digital Thinking and Mobile Teaching: Communicating, Collaborating, and Constructing in an Access Age (1st ed.). Bookboon.
- Romrell, D., Kidder, L. C., & Wood, E. (2014). The SAMR model as a framework for evaluating mLearning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 18(2). [CrossRef]
- Sinay, E., & Graikinis, D. (2018). Global Competencies in Deeper Learning Environments Enabled by Pervasive Digital Technologies: Evolving Framework for Theoretical Foundation and Developmental Evaluation.
- UNESCO. (2008). ICT Competency Standards for Teachers: Competency Standards Modules.
- UNESCO. (2013). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
- UNESCO. (2016). Developing and Implementing ICT Training for Teachers :A case study. https://tinyurl.com/ymbv44r9.
- UNESCO. (2023). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teacher https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721.
- UNESCO. (2022). Artificial intelligence and digital transformation: competencies for civil servants, UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. France. https://shorturl.at/162By.
- Westbrook, J., Durrani, N., Brown, R., Orr, D., Pryor, J., Boddy, J., & Salvi, F. (2013). Pedagogy, curriculum, teaching practices and teacher education in developing countries. https://tinyurl.com/mv79ahd8.

| Author(s) | Name of framework | Key features/massage |
| Martin and Grudziecki (2006) | DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development | Three digital competency levels as Level I- Digital competence (skills, concepts, approaches, attitudes), Level II- Digital use (professional/descipline application), and Level III- Digital transformation (Innovation/creativity) |
| Mishra and Koehler (2006) | Technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPCK) model | 21st century teachers must have all three types of knowledge as technology, pedagogy, and content. |
| Puentedura (2006) | SAMR (substitution, argumentation, modification and redefinition) model | Manage different levels as substitution, argumentation, modification and redefinition of digital tools based on their functions. The application of the model is to evaluate digital resources using status and patterns of teacher in their instructional activities (Romrell et al., 2014). |
| (UNESCO, 2008, 2013, 2018, 2023) | ICT Competency Framework for teachers | Framework has three levels competency as technology literacy, knowledge depending, and knowledge creation by taking six indicators as understanding ICT in education, curriculum, and assessment, pedagogy, applications of digital skills, organization and administration, and teacher professional learning. |
| Catalunya (2015) | Core digital competencies | Eleven competencies under four competency domains as (1) devices and applications, (2) information processing and organizing work and learning environments (3) interpersonal communication and collaboration, and (4) Citizenship, habits, civic-mindedness and digital identity. This framework is applicable for all students, teachers, and general public. |
| DQ Institute (2017) | Digital Intelligence (DQ) framework | The framework contains eight key skills: digital safety, security, emotional intelligence, communication, literacy, right, identity, and use along with 24 sub-skills which are important for teachers and students however not limited to the teachers. |
| Redecker (2017) | Digital Competency Framework for educators | The competencies are divided into educators' professional and pedagogical skills and learners' competencies, comprising 22 indicators across six areas. These areas include professional engagement, digital resources, teaching and learning, assessment, empowering learners, and digital competencies. The model encompasses research, collaboration, professional development, content modification, teaching, evaluation, feedback, and learner support in digital skills, alongside ethical and policy awareness, data analysis, and audio-visual document development skills. |
| Kelentric et al. (2017) | Professional Digital Competence Framework for teachers | The framework comprises seven indicators: subject, basic skills, school and society, ethics, pedagogy and subject didactics, leadership in learning processes, and interaction, communication, change, and development. Each indicator is clearly outlined through three techniques: necessary knowledge, skills, and teacher competencies. The model emphasizes the effective use of subject-related digital resources and materials, considering intellectual property, privacy, security, and ethical values. It also highlights the digital awareness of teachers, guardians, and learners, evaluating and utilizing digital resources, self-learning, creating a digital environment, providing learner feedback, peer communication, curriculum development, and creating learning resources. |
| NIoET (2017) | Digital Competence Framework for teachers | The competency framework encompasses five key areas of competencies for teachers as information and data literacy, communication and collaboration, digital content creation, safety, and problem-solving. It prioritizes skills in internet use, data evaluation, interaction, collaboration, communication, digital content creation, problem-solving, and digital safety. |
| ITU (2018) | Digital skills | The 21st-Century Skills framework emphasizes three key areas for lifelong learning as (1) Foundational Literacies: These core skills include literacy, numeracy, scientific literacy, ICT literacy, financial literacy, and cultural/civic literacy. Students apply these skills to everyday tasks, (2) Competencies: These skills help students tackle complex challenges. They encompass critical thinking/problem-solving, creativity, communication, and collaboration, and (3) Character Qualities: Students develop curiosity, initiative, adaptability, and social/cultural awareness to navigate their changing environment. This integrated approach encourages lifelong learning by combining foundational knowledge with competencies and character attributes |
| ETF (2018) | Digital Teaching Professional Framework for teachers | The Digital Teaching Professional Framework outlines eight indicators across three stages: exploring, adapting, and leading. It emphasizes teachers' competencies in utilizing digital resources for instructional planning, understanding new implications, fostering learners' digital skills, extracting teaching content, employing resources for assessment and feedback, ensuring accessibility, and promoting self-development. |
| Nárosy et al. (2022) | The Digital Competence Framework for Austria – Dig Comp 3.2 (2022) project was developed in 2013 and has been updated in 2017, 2019, and 2022. The framework comprehensively outlines citizens' digital competencies across six domains: digital safety, problem-solving and continuous learning, content creation, communication and collaboration, information and data literacy, and foundational access, encompassing twenty-four distinct sub-domains | |
| Barajas and Frossard (2019) | Barajas and Frossard (2019) classify digital pedagogies into three segments: (1) professional environment linked to educators' professional competencies, (2) digital resources, pedagogies, assessments, and learner empowerment tied to educators' pedagogical competencies, and (3) learners' digital creativity related to learners' competencies. | |
| GoQ (2019) | Digital Competency Framework for students and teachers | This digital competency framework presents a comprehensive approach to digital education, highlighting 12 key indicators necessary for students and teachers. It includes technological skills, digital resources for learning, and information literacy, emphasizing the importance of innovation and creativity. Collaboration, communication, and content production are integral, fostering teamwork and effective information sharing. Critical thinking and problem-solving skills are essential for navigating digital environments. The framework also addresses ethical citizenship, promoting responsible digital behavior. Personal and professional empowerment, along with inclusion and diverse needs, ensure that all individuals can benefit from and contribute to the digital learning landscape. |
| European Union (2019) | Digital Competency Framework for teachers | European Union (2019) digital competency framework outlines the professional, pedagogic, and learner competencies required for effective digital engagement. Educators' professional competencies include organizational communication, professional collaboration, reflective practice, and digital CPD. Pedagogic competencies encompass teaching and learning, digital resources, and assessment, focusing on collaborative learning, resource selection, and feedback strategies. Learner competencies cover transversal competences like information and media literacy, communication, creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving. The framework emphasizes the need for teachers to facilitate learners' digital competences and empower them through differentiated, personalized instruction, and active engagement. It integrates ethical, inclusive practices to foster a comprehensive digital learning environment. |
| Joshi et al. (2021) | DEPSWALIC digital competency framework for teachers | The framework has twenty-seven sub-skills under six keys skills (1) writing and presentation tools, (2) internet surfing and communication tools, (3) course management and evaluation tools, (4) learning and sharing tools, (5) related applications and (6) audio and visual documents development tools. Additionally, the framework included policy and ethical awareness related six awareness for teacher. |
| UNESCO et al. (2022) | Artificial intelligence and digital transformation competencies for civil servants | The UNESCO AI and Digital Transformation Competency Framework highlights digital competencies under three domains as: digital planning and design, data use and governance, and digital management and execution. Trust and creativity related attitudes are under the digital planning and design. Similarly, adaptability and curiosity related attitudes are under the data use and governance, whereas, experimentation comes under digital management and execution. The framework further highlighted four level of digital competency as: basic, intermediate, advanced, and AI-specific under the three domains of mentioned competencies. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
