Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Resolving an Open Problem on the Exponential Arithmetic-Geometric Index of Unicyclic Graphs

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

17 March 2025

Posted:

18 March 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Recently the exponential arithmetic-geometric index ($EAG$) was introduced. The exponential arithmetic-geometric index ($EAG$) of a graph $G$ is defined as $$EAG(G)=\sum_{v_iv_j \in E(G)}\,e^\frac{d_i + d_j}{2 \sqrt{d_i d_j}},$$ where $d_i$ represents the degree of the vertex $v_i$ in $G$. The characterization of extreme structures in relation to graph invariants from the class of unicyclic graphs is an important problem in discrete mathematics. Cruz, Rada and Sanchez [Extremal unicyclic graphs with respect to vertex-degree-based topological indices, {\it MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem.\/} {\bf 88} (2022) 481--503] proposed a unified method for finding extremal unicyclic graphs for exponential degree-based graph invariants. However, in the case of $EAG$, this method is insufficient to generate the maximal unicyclic graph. Consequently, the same article presented an open problem for the investigation of the maximal unicyclic graph with respect to this invariant. This article completely characterizes the maximal unicyclic graph in relation to $EAG$.
Keywords: 
;  ;  

1. Introduction

In recent years, graph theory has become a crucial tool in the field of chemistry, particularly in the study of molecular structures. A topological index is a numerical quantity that is associated with a molecular graph, used to describe specific physicochemical properties. Since Wiener introduced the first such index [43], many other indices have been developed depending on various graph parameters, including degree, distance, and eccentricity [2,3,15,26,27,28,30]. Among these, degree-based indices have received significant attention since the 1970s due to their strong correlation with molecular properties. One important example is the arithmetic-geometric index, introduced in [37]. Let G be a simple connected graph, whose vertex set V ( G ) = { v 1 , v 2 , , v n } and the edge set E ( G ) . The degree of the j-th vertex v j is denoted by d j . The arithmetic-geometric index ( A G ) is defined as
A G ( G ) = v i v J E ( G ) d i + d j 2 d i d j .
Numerous publications have extensively studied the mathematical properties of A G , specifically the extremal problems and bounds. Shegehalli et al. [38,39] calculated A G for different classes of graphs. Milovanović et al. [31] determined some upper bounds on A G for simple connected graphs. Li and Zhang [25] provided sharp bounds on A G of line graphs. Hertz et al. [23] identified the extremal chemical graphs for A G . Maximal chemical trees with respect to A G were characterized in [41]. More studies on A G can be found in references [22,36,45]. To improve the discriminative ability of topological indices, researchers introduced exponential versions of these indices in 2019 [35]. In [8,10], researchers provided a characterization of the extremal trees for the exponential Randić index. Das et al. [14] explored the extremal graphs for the exponential atom-bond connectivity index. Jahanbani et al. [24] determined the lowest value of the exponential forgotten index for trees. Das and Mondal [16] examined sharp bounds on the exponential geometric-arithmetic index of bipartite graphs. More studies on this concept can be found in references [4,5,6,9,11,17]. In this paper, we focus on the exponential arithmetic-geometric index ( E A G ), which is defined as
E A G ( G ) = v i v J E ( G ) e d i + d j 2 d i d j .
The investigation of extremal structures within different classes of graphs is a critical area of research in discrete mathematics. In particular, the identification of extremal unicyclic graphs is a major challenge. Moon and Park [32] explored the extremal values of the geometric-arithmetic index for unicyclic graphs and identified those that attained these extreme values. Extremal unicyclic graphs for A G were characterized in [42]. Liu et al. [29] provided a complete classification of extremal unicyclic graphs for the Lanzhou index. In [18,20], researchers described the maximal unicyclic graph for exponential second Zagreb and augmented Zagreb indices. For more insights into extremal unicyclic graphs, readers can refer to [1,7,12,13,19,21,33,34]. Cruz et al.[12] introduced a unified method for the identification of extremal unicyclic graphs for exponential degree-based indices, which was successfully applied to many well-known indices. However, they discovered that this method is insufficient to generate the maximal unicyclic graph in the case of E A G . Because of this, the following open problem was posed in [12]:
Problem 1. [12] Characterize the maximal unicyclic graph with respect to E A G in terms of graph order.
This paper aims to fully solve this problem by applying advanced combinatorial methods. Our goal is to develop new methods that will help us to identify the maximal unicyclic graph with respect to E A G .

2. Main Result

In this section, we address and resolve the open problem concerning the exponential arithmetic-geometric index of unicyclic graphs. To achieve this, we first establish the following essential result.
Lemma 1. 
Let
f ( x ) = x 2 x 1 x 1 2 3 ( x 4 ) , x 5 .
Then f ( x ) is a strictly increasing function on x 5 .
Proof. 
Since
f ( x ) = x 2 x 1 x 1 2 3 ( x 4 ) ,
we have
f ( x ) = 1 4 x 1 x 2 x 1 1 4 3 x 4 x 7 x 4 .
For x = 5 , we have f ( x ) > 0 . Otherwise, x 6 . One can easily see that
1 x 1 > 1 3 x 4 and x 2 x 1 > x 7 x 4 ,
and hence f ( x ) > 0 . This proves the result. □
Lemma 2. 
Let
g ( x ) = x 2 x 1 x + 3 2 2 ( x + 1 ) , x 5 .
Then g ( x ) is a strictly increasing function on x 4 .
Proof. 
Since x 4 , one can easily see that
g ( x ) = 1 4 x 1 x 2 x 1 1 4 2 ( x + 1 ) x 1 x + 1 > 0 .
Therefore g ( x ) is a strictly increasing function on x 4 . □
Lemma 3. 
Let
q ( x ) = x + 3 2 2 ( x + 1 ) x + 5 4 x + 1 .
Then q ( x ) is a strictly increasing function on x.
Proof. 
One can easily see that
q ( x ) = 1 4 2 ( x 1 ) ( x + 1 ) 3 / 2 1 8 ( x 3 ) ( x + 1 ) 3 / 2 > 0 .
Therefore q ( x ) is a strictly increasing function. □
Lemma 4. 
For b d j d i a ,
d i + d j d i d j a + b a b
with equality if and only if d i = a , d j = b .
Proof. 
For b d j d i a , we obtain
d i d j a b , d j d i b a , and   hence d i d j 1 / 4 d j d i 1 / 4 a b 1 / 4 b a 1 / 4 .
Using the above result, we obtain
d i d j 1 / 4 + d j d i 1 / 4 2 = d i d j 1 / 4 d j d i 1 / 4 2 + 4 a b 1 / 4 b a 1 / 4 2 + 4 ,
that   is , d i d j + d j d i a b + b a , that   is d i + d j d i d j a + b a b .
Moreover, the equality holds if and only if d i = a , d j = b . □
Let S n be a unicyclic graph of order n obtained by adding an edge to the star graph S n ( S n is a star graph of order n).
Theorem 1. 
Let G be a unicyclic graph of order n. Then
E A G ( G ) ( n 3 ) e n 2 n 1 + 2 e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) + e
with equality if and only if G S n .
Proof. 
Let Δ be the maximum degree in the unicyclic graph G. If Δ = n 1 , then G S n with
E A G ( G ) = ( n 3 ) e n 2 n 1 + 2 e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) + e
and hence the equality holds. For n 9 , by Sage [40], one can easily check that the result (1) holds with equality if and only if G S n . Otherwise, Δ n 2 and n 10 . For any pendant edge v i v j E ( G ) ( 1 = d j d i n 2 < n 1 ) , by Lemma 4, we obtain
d i + d j 2 d i d j < n 2 n 1 .
For any non-pendant edge v i v j E ( G ) ( 2 d j d i n 2 < n 1 ) , by Lemma 4, we obtain
d i + d j 2 d i d j < n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) .
For any edge v i v j E ( G ) , from (2) and (3), we obtain
d i + d j 2 d i d j < n 2 n 1
as
n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) < n 2 n 1 .
Let k be the length of the cycle in the unicyclic graph G. Then k 3 . We consider the following two cases:
Case 1. k = 3 . Let v 1 , v 2 , v 3 be the three vertices on the cycle in G. We assume that d 1 d 2 d 3 2 . We consider the following cases:
Case 1.1. d 2 = 2 . In this case d 2 = d 3 = 2 and hence
d 2 + d 3 2 d 2 d 3 = 1 .
Let E 1 = { v 1 v 2 , v 2 v 3 , v 3 v 1 } . Using the above result with (3) and (4), we obtain
E A G ( G ) = v i v j E ( G ) e d i + d j 2 d i d j = e d 1 + d 2 2 d 1 d 2 + e d 2 + d 3 2 d 2 d 3 + e d 3 + d 1 2 d 3 d 1 + v i v j E ( G ) E 1 e d i + d j 2 d i d j < 2 e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) + e + ( n 3 ) e n 2 n 1 .
The result (1) strictly holds.
Case 1.2. d 2 = 3 . If d 3 = 3 , then similarly, by Case 1 . 1 , we obtain
E A G ( G ) = e d 1 + d 2 2 d 1 d 2 + e d 2 + d 3 2 d 2 d 3 + e d 3 + d 1 2 d 3 d 1 + v i v j E ( G ) E 1 e d i + d j 2 d i d j < 2 e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) + e + ( n 3 ) e n 2 n 1 .
The result (1) strictly holds. Otherwise, d 3 = 2 . Let v 4 be the vertex adjacent to the vertex v 2 other than v 1 and v 3 . Since d 2 = 3 and d 3 = 2 , we have
d 2 + d 3 2 d 2 d 3 = 25 24 .
Again since d 2 = 3 and d 4 n 4 , by Lemma 4, we obtain
d 2 + d 4 2 d 2 d 4 n 1 2 3 ( n 4 ) .
Since n 10 , by Lemma 1, we obtain
f ( n ) = n 2 n 1 n 1 2 3 ( n 4 ) f ( 10 ) = 5 3 9 8 > 0.606 .
From the above results, we obtain
e n 2 n 1 + e > e n 1 2 3 ( n 4 ) + 0.606 + e > 1.83 e n 1 2 3 ( n 4 ) + e > e n 1 2 3 ( n 4 ) + 0.83 e n + 2 2 3 + e e n 1 2 3 ( n 4 ) + 1.83 e > e n 1 2 3 ( n 4 ) + e 25 24 e d 2 + d 3 2 d 2 d 3 + e d 2 + d 4 2 d 2 d 4 .
Let E 2 = E 1 { v 2 v 4 } . By (3) and (4), we obtain
e d 1 + d 2 2 d 1 d 2 < e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) , e d 3 + d 1 2 d 3 d 1 < e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) , a n d e d i + d j 2 d i d j < e n 2 n 1 f o r a n y v i v j E ( G ) E 2 .
Using the above results with | E ( G ) E 2 | = n 4 , we obtain
E A G ( G ) = e d 1 + d 2 2 d 1 d 2 + e d 2 + d 3 2 d 2 d 3 + e d 3 + d 1 2 d 3 d 1 + e d 2 + d 4 2 d 2 d 4 + v i v j E ( G ) E 2 e d i + d j 2 d i d j < 2 e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) + e + ( n 3 ) e n 2 n 1 .
The result (1) strictly holds.
Case 1.3. d 2 4 . Let S 1 = { v 2 v j E ( G ) | f o r a l l v j N G ( v 2 ) } , S = S 1 { v 1 v 3 } and E 3 = E ( G ) S . In this case d 1 n 3 , 4 d 2 n + 1 2 , and d 3 2 . Since d 1 d 2 d 3 , by Lemma 4, we obtain
d 1 + d 2 2 d 1 d 2 n + 1 4 n 3 , d 2 + d 3 2 d 2 d 3 n + 5 4 n + 1 , d 1 + d 3 2 d 1 d 3 n 1 2 2 ( n 3 ) < n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) .
Since | E 3 | = | E ( G ) S | = n d 2 1 , by (4), we obtain
v i v j E 3 e d i + d j 2 d i d j < ( n d 2 1 ) e n 2 n 1 .
Claim 1.
2 e n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) + e n + 1 4 n 3 + e n + 5 4 n + 1 < 2 e n 2 n 1 + e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) .
Proof of Claim 1. For 10 n 11 , by Mathematica [44], one can easily check that the result holds. Otherwise, n 12 . By Lemma 2, the function g ( x ) = x 2 x 1 x + 3 2 2 ( x + 1 ) is increasing on x 12 , and hence
g ( x ) g ( 12 ) = 6 11 15 2 26 > 0.338 .
Since n 12 , from the above, we have
n 2 n 1 n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) > 0.338 > ln 1.4 ,
that   is , e n 2 n 1 n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) > 1.4 , that   is , e n 2 n 1 > 1.4 e n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) .
By Lemma 3, the function q ( x ) = x + 3 2 2 ( x + 1 ) x + 5 4 x + 1 is increasing on x 12 , and hence
q ( x ) q ( 12 ) = 15 2 26 17 4 13 > 0.29 .
Since n 12 , from the above, we have
n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) n + 5 4 n + 1 > 0.29 > ln 5 4 ,
that   is , e n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) n + 5 4 n + 1 > 5 4 , that   is , 0.8 e n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) > e n + 5 4 n + 1 .
Since n > 5 , one can easily see that
n + 1 4 n 3 < n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) , that   is , e n + 1 4 n 3 < e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) .
Using the above result with (7) and (8), we obtain
2 e n 2 n 1 + e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) > 2.8 e n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) + e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) > 2 e n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) + e n + 5 4 n + 1 + e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) > 2 e n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) + e n + 5 4 n + 1 + e n + 1 4 n 3 .
This completes the proof of Claim 1.
For v j N G ( v 2 ) { v 1 , v 3 } , we have 4 d 2 n + 1 2 , 1 d j n 3 2 , and by Lemma 4, we obtain
d 2 + d j 2 d 2 d j n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) .
Using the above result with (5), we obtain
v j : v j N G ( v 2 ) e d 2 + d j 2 d 2 d j = e d 1 + d 2 2 d 1 d 2 + e d 2 + d 3 2 d 2 d 3 + v j : v j N G ( v 2 ) { v 1 , v 3 } e d 2 + d j 2 d 2 d j e n + 1 4 n 3 + e n + 5 4 n + 1 + ( d 2 2 ) e n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) e n + 1 4 n 3 + e n + 5 4 n + 1 + 2 e n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) + ( d 2 4 ) e n 2 n 1
as
n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) < n 2 n 1 .
Using (5), (6), (9) and Claim 1, we obtain
E A G ( G ) = v i v j E ( G ) e d i + d j 2 d i d j = e d 1 + d 3 2 d 1 d 3 + v j : v j N G ( v 2 ) e d 2 + d j 2 d 2 d j + v i v j E 3 e d i + d j 2 d i d j < e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) + e n + 1 4 n 3 + e n + 5 4 n + 1 + 2 e n + 3 2 2 ( n + 1 ) + ( d 2 4 ) e n 2 n 1 + ( n d 2 1 ) e n 2 n 1 < ( n 3 ) e n 2 n 1 + 2 e n + 1 2 2 ( n 2 ) < ( n 3 ) e n 2 n 1 + 2 e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) + e .
The result (1) strictly holds.
Case 2. k 4 . Let v 1 , v 2 , , v k be the vertices on the cycle C k ( k 4 ) . We can assume that d 1 = max { d i : v i V ( C k ) } . Then d 1 n k + 2 n 2 and d i 2 ( 2 i k ) . Then by Lemma 4, for v 1 v 2 E ( C k ) and v 1 v k E ( C k ) , we obtain
d 1 + d 2 2 d 1 d 2 n 2 2 ( n 2 ) and d 1 + d k 2 d 1 d k n 2 2 ( n 2 ) .
Since v 2 v 3 E ( C k ) and v 3 v 4 E ( C k ) with 2 d 2 , d 3 , d 4 n k + 4 2 n 2 , by Lemma 4, we obtain
d 2 + d 3 2 d 2 d 3 n + 4 4 n and d 3 + d 4 2 d 3 d 4 n + 4 4 n .
Claim 2.
2 e n + 4 4 n < e n 2 n 1 + e .
Proof of Claim 2. For 10 n 12 , by Mathematica [44], one can easily check that the result holds. Otherwise, n 13 . Let us consider a function
h ( x ) = x x 1 x + 4 2 x , x 13 .
Then we have
h ( x ) = 1 4 x 3 / 2 ( x 1 ) 3 / 2 2 x 3 / 2 ( x 2 ) ( x 4 ) ( x 1 ) 3 / 2 > 0 .
Thus h ( x ) is an increasing function on x 13 and hence
h ( x ) h ( 13 ) = 13 12 17 2 13 > 1.395 > 2 ln 2 .
From the above, we obtain
n n 1 n + 4 2 n > 2 ln 2 ,
that is,
e n 2 n 1 n + 4 4 n > 2 ,
that is,
2 e n + 4 4 n < e n 2 n 1 < e n 2 n 1 + e .
This completes the proof of Claim 2.
Let p be the number of pendant vertices in G. Since G has cycle length at least 4, we have p n 4 . Since n + 1 2 ( n 1 ) < n n 1 , using (3), we obtain
v i v j E ( G ) { v 2 v 3 , v 3 v 4 } , d i d j 2 e d i + d j 2 d i d j < ( n p 2 ) e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) 2 e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) + ( n p 4 ) e n 2 n 1 .
Using the above result with (2), (11) and Claim 2, we obtain
E A G ( G ) = v i v j E ( G ) , d i d j = 1 e d i + d j 2 d i d j + v i v j E ( G ) , d i d j 2 e d i + d j 2 d i d j < p e n 2 n 1 + e d 2 + d 3 2 d 2 d 3 + e d 3 + d 4 2 d 3 d 4 + v i v j E ( G ) { v 2 v 3 , v 3 v 4 } , d i d j 2 e d i + d j 2 d i d j < p e n 2 n 1 + 2 e n + 4 4 n + ( n p 4 ) e n 2 n 1 + 2 e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) < ( n 3 ) e n 2 n 1 + 2 e n + 1 2 2 ( n 1 ) + e .
The result (1) strictly holds. This completes the proof of the theorem. □

3. Concluding Remarks

An open problem that was stated in [12] has been resolved in this paper. It has been determined that the maximal unicyclic graph with respect to E A G can be described in terms of graph order n.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.C.D. and J.B.; investigation, K.C.D. and J.B.; writing—original draft preparation, K.C.D. and J.B.; writing—review and editing, K.C.D. and J.B.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. A. Ali, A.M. Alanazi, T.S. Hassan, Y. Shang, On unicyclic graphs with a given number of pendent vertices or matching number and their graphical edge-weight-function indices, Mathematics 12 (2024) 3658. [CrossRef]
  2. A. Ali, B. Furtula, I. Gutman, D. Vukičević, Augmented Zagreb index: extremal results and bounds, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 85 (2021) 211–244.
  3. K. Aarthi, S. Elumalai, S. Balachandran, S. Mondal, Extremal values of the atom-bond sum-connectivity index in bicyclic graphs, J. Appl. Math. Comput. 69 (2023) 4269–4285. [CrossRef]
  4. S. Balachandran, T. Vetrík, Exponential second Zagreb index of chemical trees, Trans. Combin. 10 (2021) 97–106.
  5. J. Bera, K.C. Das, The minimal molecular tree for the exponential Randić index, Mathematics 12 (2024) 3601. [CrossRef]
  6. W. Carballosa, Y. Quintana, J.M. Rodríguez, J.M. Sigarreta, Exponential topological indices: optimal inequalities and applications, J. Math. Chem. 61 (2023) 933–949. [CrossRef]
  7. M. Chen, Y. Zhu, Extremal unicyclic graphs of Sombor index, Appl. Math. Comput. 463 (2024) 128374. [CrossRef]
  8. R. Cruz, J. Monsalve, J. Rada, Trees with maximum exponential Randić index, Discrete Appl. Math. 283 (2020) 634–643. [CrossRef]
  9. R. Cruz, J. Monsalve, J. Rada, The balanced double star has maximum exponential second Zagreb index, J. Combin. Optim. 41 (2021) 544–552. [CrossRef]
  10. R. Cruz, J. Rada, The path and the star as extremal values of vertex-degree-based topological indices among trees, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 82 (2019) 715–732.
  11. R. Cruz, J. Rada, Extremal graphs for exponential VDB indices, Kragujev. J. Math. 46 (2022) 105–113. [CrossRef]
  12. R. Cruz, J. Rada, W. Sanchez, Extremal unicyclic graphs with respect to vertex-degree-based topological indices, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 88 (2022) 481–503. [CrossRef]
  13. K.C. Das, On the exponential atom-bond connectivity index of graphs, Mathematics 13 (2025) 269. [CrossRef]
  14. K.C. Das, S. Elumalai, S. Balachandran, Open problems on the exponential vertex-degree-based topological indices of graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 293 (2021) 38–49. [CrossRef]
  15. K.C. Das, I. Gutman, I. Milovanović, E. Milovanović, B. Furtula, Degree-based energies of graphs, Linear Algebra Appl. 554 (2018) 185–204. [CrossRef]
  16. K.C. Das, S. Mondal, On exponential geometric-arithmetic index of graphs, J. Math. Chem. 60 (2024) 205–217. [CrossRef]
  17. K.C. Das, S. Mondal, D. Y. Huh, On the exponential augmented Zagreb index of graphs, J. Appl. Math. Comput. 70 (2024) 839–865. [CrossRef]
  18. K.C. Das, S. Mondal, D. Huh, Open problem on the maximum exponential augmented Zagreb index of unicyclic graphs, Comput. Appl. Math. 43 (2024) 317. [CrossRef]
  19. H. Deng, T. Vetrík, S. Balachandran, On the harmonic index and diameter of unicyclic graphs, Math. Rep. (Bucur.) 22 (2020) 11–18.
  20. M. Eliasi, Unicyclic and bicyclic graphs with maximum exponential second Zagreb index, Discrete Appl. Math. 307 (2022) 172–179. [CrossRef]
  21. S.M. Ergotić, On unicyclic graphs with minimum Graovac-Ghorbani index, Mathematics 12 (2024) 384. [CrossRef]
  22. X. Guo, Y. Gao, Arithmetic-geometric spectral radius and energy of graphs, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 83 (2020) 651–660.
  23. A. Hertz, S. Bonte, G. Devillez, V. Dusollier, H. Mélot, D. Schindl, Extremal chemical graphs for the arithmetic-geometric index, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 93 (2025) 791–818.
  24. A. Jahanbani, M. Cancan, R. Motamedi, Extremal Trees for the Exponential of Forgotten Topological Index, J. Math. 2022 (2022) 7455701. [CrossRef]
  25. G. Li, M. Zhang, Sharp bounds on the arithmetic-geometric index of graphs and line graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 318 (2022) 47–60. [CrossRef]
  26. H. Liu, Comparison between Merrifield-Simmons index and some vertex-degree-based topological indices, Comput. Appl. Math. 42 (2023) 89. [CrossRef]
  27. H. Liu, Extremal problems on Sombor indices of unicyclic graphs with a given diameter, Comput. Appl. Math. 41 (2022) 138. [CrossRef]
  28. H. Liu, Y. Huang, Sharp bounds on the symmetric division deg index of graphs and line graphs, Comp. Appl. Math. 42 (2023) 285. [CrossRef]
  29. Q. Liu, Q. Li, H. Zhang, Unicyclic graphs with extremal Lanzhou index, Appl. Math. - J. Chinese Univ. 37 (2022) 350–365. [CrossRef]
  30. V. Maitreyi, S. Elumalai, S. Balachandran, H. Liu, The minimum Sombor index of trees with given number of pendant vertices, Comp. Appl. Math. 42 (2023) 331. [CrossRef]
  31. I.Ž. Milovanović, M.M. Matejić, E.I. Milovanović, Upper bounds for arithmetic-geometric index of graphs, Sci. Publ. State Univ. Novi Pazar Ser. A: Appl. Math. Inform. Mech. 10 (2018) 49–54. [CrossRef]
  32. S. Moon, S. Park, Bounds for the geometric-arithmetic index of unicyclic graphs, J. Appl. Math. Comput. 69 (2023) 2955–2971. [CrossRef]
  33. W. Ning, K. Wang, On the Estrada indices of unicyclic graphs with fixed diameters, Mathematics 9 (2021) 2395. [CrossRef]
  34. P. Nithyaa, S. Elumalai, S. Balachandran, M. Masrec, Ordering unicyclic graphs with a fixed girth by Sombor indices, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 92 (2024) 205–224.
  35. J. Rada, Exponential vertex-degree-based topological indices and discrimination, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 82 (2019) 29–41.
  36. J.M. Rodríguez, J.L. Sánchez, J.M. Sigarreta, E. Tours, Bounds on the arithmetic-geometric index, Symmetry 13 (2021) 689. [CrossRef]
  37. V.S. Shegehalli, R. Kanabur, Arithmetic-geometric indices of path graph, J. Comput. Math. Sci. 6 (2015) 19–24.
  38. V.S. Shegehalli, R. Kanabur, Arithmetic-geometric indices of some class of graph, J. Comput. Math. Sci. 6 (2015) 194–199.
  39. V.S. Shegehalli, R. Kanabur, Computation of new degree-based topological indices of graphene, J. Math. 2016 (2016) 1–6. [CrossRef]
  40. W.A. Stein, Sage Mathematics Software (Version 6.8), The Sage Development Team, http://www.sagemath.org, 2015.
  41. S. Vujošević, G. Popivoda, Ž.K. Vukićević, B. Furtula, R. Škrekovski, Arithmetic-geometric index and its relations with geometric-arithmetic index, Appl. Math. Comput. 391 (2021) 125706. [CrossRef]
  42. Ž.K. Vukićević, S. Vujošević, G. Popivoda, Unicyclic graphs with extremal values of arithmetic-geometric index, Discrete Appl. Math. 302 (2021) 67–75. [CrossRef]
  43. H. Wiener, Structural determination of paraffin boiling points, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 69 (1947) 17–20. [CrossRef]
  44. Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 7.0, Champaign, IL, 2008.
  45. L. Zheng, G. X. Tian, S. Y. Cui, On spectral radius and energy of arithmetic-geometric matrix of graphs, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 83 (2020) 635–650.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated