1. Introduction
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a cornerstone in the non-invasive assessment of cardiac electrophysiological activity, providing invaluable insights into myocardial function and overall cardiac health. This diagnostic tool captures the heart’s electrical activity, facilitating the diagnosis of a wide spectrum of cardiovascular diseases, including arrhythmias, myocardial infarctions, and conduction system disorders. Its enduring relevance stems from its low cost and widespread availability, enabling clinicians to identify numerous structural and electrical heart abnormalities. However, the traditional interpretation of ECG data heavily relies on the expertise of cardiologists.
The emergence of deep learning has ushered in a transformative era in medical data analysis, particularly within the domain of ECG diagnostics. Artificial intelligence (AI) has bestowed upon the electrocardiogram (ECG) and the clinicians who interpret them diagnostic capabilities that extend beyond human limitations. AI-enhanced ECG (AI-ECG) models have demonstrated the capacity to surpass the diagnostic accuracy of human experts in various contexts. This technological advancement holds the promise of revolutionizing cardiac care by enabling more rapid and accurate diagnoses, facilitating early interventions, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.
This literature review endeavors to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of AI in ECG recognition. It will explore the foundational methodologies underpinning AI-ECG, delve into its diverse applications across various cardiac conditions, identify the challenges and limitations that currently impede its widespread adoption, and highlight promising avenues for future research. By synthesizing the existing knowledge in this rapidly evolving field, this review aims to offer valuable insights for researchers, clinicians, healthcare professionals, and policymakers who are keenly interested in the intersection of artificial intelligence and cardiology.
The primary objectives of this review are to furnish a thorough understanding of the present landscape of AI in ECG recognition, to pinpoint significant advancements and existing hurdles, and to underscore potential opportunities for future investigation. The scope of this review is broad, encompassing a wide array of topics ranging from the fundamental machine learning and deep learning techniques employed in AI-ECG to its practical applications in diagnosing specific cardiac diseases, the metrics used to evaluate its performance, the challenges hindering its clinical translation, the future directions of research, the critical role of data preprocessing and feature engineering, and the perspectives of clinicians who utilize and assess these AI-driven ECG systems.
The increasing integration of AI into ECG analysis signifies a fundamental shift in cardiac diagnostics. It represents a move from conventional, experience-based interpretation towards automated systems that offer the potential for significantly enhanced accuracy and efficiency. The ability of AI to often outperform human experts in specific diagnostic tasks, coupled with its capacity to process vast quantities of data with remarkable speed, suggests a future where computational power plays an increasingly vital role in augmenting or even exceeding human capabilities in ECG interpretation. Furthermore, the applications of AI in ECG are expanding beyond the traditional realm of cardiac diagnostics. AI is now being utilized for risk prediction of future cardiovascular events, for the identification of asymptomatic cardiac conditions that might otherwise go unnoticed, and even for the detection of non-cardiac conditions through subtle patterns in the ECG. This broadening scope indicates that the ECG, when analyzed through the lens of artificial intelligence, is emerging as a powerful and versatile data source for gaining comprehensive insights into overall health status and predicting future health risks.
2. Overview of Existing Literature Reviews on ECG AI Recognition
The application of artificial intelligence in electrocardiogram (ECG) recognition has garnered substantial attention in recent years, leading to a proliferation of literature reviews that synthesize the advancements and challenges in this dynamic field. A review by Boulif et al. [
21] specifically focused on ECG-based models for arrhythmia diagnosis utilizing AI techniques over the preceding 12 years. This review highlighted the increasing prevalence of AI in this domain while also underscoring critical challenges such as the inherent lack of explainability in many deep learning methodologies [
21]. Similarly, Shrestha et al. [
26,
27] presented a comprehensive overview of research endeavors that have applied machine learning and deep learning algorithms to ECG data for a multitude of diagnostic purposes. Their work identified significant limitations that continue to impede the widespread clinical adoption of these techniques, including issues related to imbalanced datasets and the often-opaque nature of the AI models themselves [
27]. They emphasized a clear need for a more holistic and integrated approach to leveraging ECG and AI for comprehensive diagnosis [
27].
Nechita et al. provided an extensive review of AI-enhanced ECG applications within the broader field of cardiology. Their work encompassed risk prediction, the diagnosis of various cardiac diseases, and notably, a dedicated section on the implications and applications of AI-ECG in the context of COVID-19 related cardiac complications. Dasdelen et al. [
1] conducted a focused systematic review and meta-analysis specifically examining the diagnostic accuracy of AI models in detecting electrolyte imbalances using ECG data, an area of growing interest for non-invasive monitoring. Li et al. also contributed a systematic review and meta-analysis, their focus being on the application of AI for the detection of heart failure based on ECG findings. Dhyani et al. presented a review of ECG-based arrhythmia detection systems that employ machine learning techniques, offering insights into the various methodologies and their effectiveness. Islam outlined a study that explored the use of support vector machines (SVM) and artificial neural networks (ANN) for the classification of ECG data, highlighting the potential of these traditional machine learning approaches.
Singh and Krishnan provided a comprehensive review of the trends in ECG signal feature extraction methods and their applications in digital health and artificial intelligence, a critical aspect for developing effective AI-ECG models. Zhao offered an in-depth analysis of transformer architectures and their increasing application in ECG classification, reflecting the growing interest in these advanced deep learning models. Alzubaidi et al. presented a broad review of popular convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures used in computer vision tasks, which are also highly relevant to the analysis of ECG images. Yuan et al. introduced a novel neural network architecture for ECG diagnosis that utilizes deformable CNNs, a technique aimed at improving the model’s ability to adapt to variations in ECG signals. Ouyang and Chiu [
2] provided an editorial perspective on the significant impact of AI-powered ECG interpretation on the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, underscoring the clinical relevance of this application. Strodthoff et al. [
3] explored the potential of deep learning to predict a wide range of both cardiac and non-cardiac discharge diagnoses from a single ECG, suggesting a future role for AI in comprehensive screening. Ruotolo et al. developed a machine-learning model based on ECG features to aid in the differential diagnosis between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, and Anderson-Fabry disease, showcasing AI’s potential in distinguishing between complex cardiac conditions. Hammer et al. focused on the use of explainable AI for the detection of atrial fibrillation using reduced lead ECGs in mobile applications, addressing the critical need for transparency in AI-driven diagnostics. Zhao [
27] further reviewed the application of transformer architectures in ECG classification, highlighting their strengths in capturing temporal dependencies. Singh et al. conducted a systematic review on interpretable machine learning techniques specifically for heart disease diagnosis using ECG signals, emphasizing the importance of understanding the model’s decision-making process. Ao and He evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of image-based deep learning algorithms when applied to 12-lead ECGs, addressing the challenge of using ECGs stored as images. Bhat et al. provided a comprehensive review of deep learning strategies for ECG analysis, encompassing various architectures and applications.
These existing reviews collectively highlight the significant potential of AI in ECG analysis across a diverse range of cardiac conditions. Many studies have demonstrated performance levels that are comparable to, and in some instances, even exceed those of human experts. However, a consistent theme across these reviews is the discussion of limitations and challenges that still need to be addressed. These include critical issues related to data quality, the generalizability of AI models across different patient populations and clinical settings, the often-lacking interpretability of deep learning models, and the complexities associated with the integration of AI-ECG systems into real-world clinical practice. Furthermore, many reviews point towards promising future research directions, with a particular emphasis on areas such as explainable AI, personalized medicine approaches, the integration of multimodal data for more comprehensive analysis, and the crucial need to mitigate bias in both datasets and algorithms. While many reviews have focused on specific cardiac conditions or particular AI techniques, there remains a need for a review that comprehensively integrates all these aspects, from the fundamental methodologies to the practicalities of clinical implementation and the perspectives of the clinicians who will ultimately use these systems, as outlined in the user’s query. Additionally, while some snippets touch upon the role of AI in predicting non-cardiac conditions using ECG data, this emerging and potentially transformative application could benefit from a more in-depth exploration within a dedicated review.
The sheer volume of existing review literature on AI in ECG underscores the intense interest and the rapid pace of development within this field. However, the tendency of many reviews to concentrate on specific aspects of AI-ECG, such as particular cardiac conditions or AI techniques, suggests a somewhat fragmented understanding of the overall landscape. This fragmentation highlights the value of a comprehensive review that seeks to synthesize these different pieces of knowledge into a unified perspective. Moreover, the consistent recurrence of challenges such as the need for improved interpretability and the presence of data bias across multiple reviews indicates that these are fundamental hurdles that must be overcome for the successful translation of AI-ECG research into routine clinical practice. The repeated identification of these issues reinforces the importance of ongoing research that specifically targets these areas to ensure the development of reliable, trustworthy, and equitable AI-ECG systems.
3. Seminal Research Papers in AI-Enhanced ECG Analysis and Diagnosis
Over the past few years, several seminal research papers have significantly propelled the field of AI-enhanced ECG analysis and diagnosis forward, demonstrating the transformative potential of these technologies across a wide spectrum of cardiac conditions. Attia et al. [
1] at Mayo Clinic have made groundbreaking contributions by showcasing the ability of AI algorithms to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) from standard 12-lead ECGs recorded during normal sinus rhythm. This pioneering work revealed that AI can identify subtle patterns indicative of AF that may not be apparent through conventional ECG interpretation, opening significant avenues for the early detection of this common arrhythmia and the subsequent prevention of potentially life-threatening complications such as stroke. Furthermore, the same research group has also developed AI algorithms for the detection of low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12] , a key indicator of heart failure, and for the prediction of future heart failure risk [
5], highlighting the versatility of AI in addressing critical diagnostic challenges in cardiology.
In a significant contribution to the field, Ribeiro et al. demonstrated that AI-enhanced ECG models can accurately predict mortality from ECG images with a performance level that is comparable to models utilizing natively digital ECG data. This finding is particularly important as it suggests that AI-ECG technologies can be effectively deployed in diverse global settings, including those that lack advanced digital ECG infrastructure, potentially reducing healthcare disparities. Dhingra et al. further advanced the field by developing and validating a sophisticated ECG-AI model known as PRESENT-SHD. This model employs a deep learning algorithm trained on a large dataset to not only detect existing structural heart disease (SHD) but also to predict its future development, offering a powerful tool for early risk stratification and preventive interventions. Lee et al. conducted a prospective multicenter study evaluating the performance of an AI-enhanced ECG model (AiTiAMI) in estimating the probability of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in real-world emergency department settings. Their findings provided crucial validation for the clinical utility of AI in the timely and accurate diagnosis of this critical cardiac event.
Herman et al. [
24] made a significant breakthrough with the development of an AI model specifically designed for detecting acute occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) using standard 12-lead ECGs. Their research demonstrated that this AI model achieved superior accuracy in identifying OMIs when compared to conventional STEMI criteria, suggesting its potential to significantly improve the triage and management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Siontis et al. [
18] have contributed valuable research in the area of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) by demonstrating the potential of AI analysis of standard ECGs to track the longitudinal progression of the disease and the response to treatment across diverse international patient cohorts. Strodthoff et al. [
3] explored the broad diagnostic capabilities of AI-enhanced ECG by showing that a single deep learning model could predict a wide range of both cardiac and non-cardiac discharge diagnoses from a single ECG collected in the emergency department, hinting at the potential for a unified AI-based screening tool. Ruotolo et al. developed a machine-learning model based on human-interpretable ECG features to support the differential diagnosis between HCM, cardiac amyloidosis, and Anderson-Fabry disease, addressing the challenge of distinguishing between phenotypically similar conditions. Noseworthy et al. conducted a prospective study that demonstrated the effectiveness of AI-guided screening based on ECGs in identifying patients who are at a higher risk of having atrial fibrillation detected on subsequent cardiac monitoring. Yao et al. [
13] in the EAGLE study provided evidence from a prospective, randomized trial that an AI-ECG algorithm significantly increased the detection of low ejection fraction in primary care settings compared to standard care alone. Ouyang et al. at Cedars-Sinai developed an AI algorithm that can detect atrial fibrillation in diverse patient populations using standard electrocardiogram readings, showcasing the potential for equitable AI-driven diagnostics.
These seminal studies, along with numerous others, represent significant breakthroughs in the application of AI to ECG analysis. They have demonstrated the ability of AI to detect conditions previously thought to be invisible to ECG, to achieve diagnostic accuracy comparable to or exceeding that of cardiologists, to predict future cardiovascular risks, and to facilitate large-scale screening and remote monitoring through mobile and wearable technologies. The progression from early AI applications that focused on automating existing diagnostic criteria to the current wave of research uncovering subtle patterns indicative of future risks and previously undetectable conditions signifies a maturing field with increasing clinical relevance. The emphasis on validating AI-ECG algorithms in diverse populations and real-world clinical settings, as evidenced by several pivotal studies, is crucial for establishing their clinical utility and addressing concerns about generalizability, ultimately paving the way for their integration into routine cardiac care.
4. Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methodologies for ECG Analysis
The field of AI-enhanced ECG analysis has witnessed the application of a wide array of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methodologies, each with its own strengths and suitability for specific tasks. Traditional machine learning techniques, such as Support Vector Machines (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), have been extensively used for ECG classification [
21]. SVMs have proven effective in distinguishing between the presence and absence of cardiac arrhythmias [
21] and in classifying various heart diseases by leveraging features extracted from both the time and frequency domains of ECG signals [
21]. The combination of wavelet transform, a powerful signal processing tool, with SVM has also been explored to achieve improved diagnostic accuracy. KNN, known for its simplicity and effectiveness in pattern recognition, has been applied to tasks such as classifying normal ECG recordings from those indicating myocardial infarction [
21]. Ensemble methods, which combine the predictions of multiple learning algorithms to improve robustness and accuracy, have also found utility in ECG analysis, with Random Forest being a notable example that has demonstrated good performance in various classification tasks [
21]. Additionally, other traditional ML techniques like Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Fuzzy Logic, Linear Regression, Bayesian Networks, and Gradient Boosting have been employed for specific aspects of ECG analysis, including feature selection, classification, and risk prediction [
21].
However, the most significant advancements in AI-ECG have been driven by deep learning architectures [
21]. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have emerged as a dominant force in this field, particularly adept at identifying complex patterns in both raw ECG signals and ECG data that has been transformed into image representations [
19,
20,
21]. One-dimensional CNNs are commonly used to process the temporal sequences of raw ECG signals, while two-dimensional CNNs are applied to ECG data that has been converted into images, allowing the models to leverage spatial feature extraction capabilities [
20]. CNNs have demonstrated exceptional abilities in automated ECG classification and the detection of various cardiac abnormalities by learning intricate hierarchies of features directly from the raw ECG signals [
19]. A diverse range of CNN architectures, including ResNet, VGG, and Inception, have been successfully employed for a multitude of ECG classification tasks, showcasing the adaptability and power of these models. More specialized CNN architectures, such as deformable CNNs, have also been explored to enhance the model’s ability to adapt to the inherent variability and complexity of ECG features by dynamically adjusting their receptive fields [
19].
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), including their more advanced variants like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), have also played a crucial role in ECG analysis [
21]. RNNs are particularly well-suited for capturing the temporal dependencies that are intrinsic to ECG signals, making them highly effective for automated ECG classification and the detection of cardiac abnormalities that manifest over time [
21]. Bidirectional RNNs, which process ECG segments in both forward and backward time directions, have proven valuable in capturing both short-term and long-term dependencies within the signals [
21].
The increasing interest in Transformer networks and attention mechanisms marks a significant trend in the field [
24]. Originally developed for natural language processing tasks, Transformer networks are now being applied to ECG analysis to effectively model complex temporal relationships that other architectures might overlook [
24]. Attention mechanisms, including self-attention, enable these models to selectively focus on the most pertinent parts of the ECG signal for accurate diagnosis [
24]. Hybrid models, which combine the strengths of different deep learning architectures, have also shown promising results. For instance, the integration of CNNs for feature extraction with RNNs for temporal sequence modeling has proven particularly beneficial for the early diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias [
22,
23]. These hybrid architectures often incorporate attention mechanisms to further refine the model’s focus on the most informative parts of the ECG signal [
22,
23]. CNN-LSTM architectures, for example, have been successfully applied to tasks such as the prediction of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in prehospital settings.
The shift from traditional machine learning to deep learning in ECG analysis reflects the growing need to capture the intricate patterns and complexities inherent in cardiac electrophysiological signals. While traditional ML methods, often relying on handcrafted features, have provided valuable insights, deep learning, with its capacity for automatic feature extraction, offers a more powerful and adaptable approach [
25]. The increasing prevalence of hybrid models, particularly those that synergistically combine CNNs, RNNs, and attention mechanisms, underscores the importance of leveraging the unique strengths of different architectures to achieve superior performance in ECG analysis. Furthermore, the rising interest in Transformer networks and attention mechanisms signifies a move towards effectively capturing long-range dependencies within ECG signals, a capability that is crucial for the accurate diagnosis of certain cardiac conditions that manifest through subtle, temporally distant patterns.
5. Applications of AI in ECG for Diagnosis of Different Cardiac Diseases
Artificial intelligence has found extensive applications in the diagnosis of a wide range of cardiac diseases using electrocardiogram (ECG) data, demonstrating its potential to revolutionize clinical cardiology.
5.1. Arrhythmia Detection and Classification
One of the most prominent applications of AI in ECG is the interpretation and detection of various arrhythmias, which are abnormalities in the heart’s rhythm [
21,
22,
23]. AI algorithms have shown remarkable promise in identifying conditions such as atrial fibrillation (AF), ventricular tachycardia, and other rhythm disturbances [
21,
22,
23]. Deep learning models, particularly CNNs and RNNs, have demonstrated a superior capability in automated ECG classification and the detection of these cardiac rhythm abnormalities [
21,
22,
23]. Notably, AI can identify subtle subclinical changes in ECGs that are indicative of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, even when the patient is not experiencing an active episode of arrhythmia [
1]. Furthermore, AI-enhanced ECG analysis from wearable devices like smartwatches has shown promising results in improving the detection of atrial arrhythmias, potentially enabling earlier diagnosis and management.
5.2. Myocardial Infarction (MI) Diagnosis
AI-enabled ECG interpretation has also shown significant promise in the rapid and accurate diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a critical condition requiring timely intervention. This includes the detection of both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) [
24,
25]. AI models can detect subtle ECG changes that are indicative of myocardial ischemia and infarction [
24,
25]. In some cases, AI-ECG algorithms have been shown to outperform standard ECG criteria in identifying patients with occluded coronary arteries, highlighting their potential to improve the management of acute coronary syndromes [
24,
25].
5.3. Heart Failure (HF) Prediction and Detection
AI has also been successfully applied to the prediction and detection of heart failure (HF), a complex clinical syndrome. AI models have demonstrated the ability to predict the risk of developing heart failure with an accuracy that is comparable to or even better than existing traditional risk calculators [
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12]. AI-ECG models have also been shown to effectively detect asymptomatic heart failure and predict outcomes in patients already diagnosed with acute heart failure [
8]. Notably, AI can identify individuals at high risk of developing heart failure in the future by analyzing ECG images, even before they exhibit overt symptoms of the condition [
5].
5.4. Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) Identification
AI has also been applied to aid in the diagnosis of Long QT Syndrome (LQTS), a rare inherited heart condition that can cause potentially life-threatening arrhythmias. AI algorithms have shown the ability to identify LQTS, even in cases where the corrected QT interval (QTc), a key diagnostic criterion, is within the normal range [
7]. Machine learning algorithms have the potential to detect subtle abnormalities in ECG waveforms that might not be routinely considered by human interpreters for the diagnosis of LQTS.
5.5. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) Detection
AI, particularly deep learning models utilizing CNNs, has demonstrated significant promise in detecting hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), a genetic heart condition characterized by the thickening of the heart muscle [
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18]. AI-ECG algorithms have achieved high accuracy in identifying HCM, even in ECGs that do not exhibit the traditional diagnostic criteria for the condition [
16,
17,
18].
5.6. Other Relevant Cardiac Conditions
Beyond these major applications, AI-ECG models have shown utility in detecting a wide range of other cardiac conditions, including left ventricular systolic dysfunction [
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12], valvular heart diseases [
27], and even non-cardiac conditions like electrolyte imbalances. AI can also estimate biological heart age and predict cardiovascular outcomes, as well as the risk of developing aortic stenosis and pulmonary hypertension. The potential for AI-ECG to aid in the early diagnosis of conditions like thyrotoxic periodic paralysis using ECG data combined with routine blood tests is also being explored.
The diverse applications of AI in diagnosing a wide range of cardiac conditions from ECG data underscore its potential as a comprehensive tool in cardiology. AI’s ability to discern subtle ECG patterns associated with various diseases suggests that it can improve diagnostic accuracy and enable earlier detection compared to traditional methods. Furthermore, the emerging applications in non-cardiac conditions indicate a potential expansion of ECG’s diagnostic utility beyond its traditional cardiac focus.
6. Performance Evaluation Metrics and Methods in ECG AI
The evaluation of AI models for ECG analysis and diagnosis relies on a range of performance metrics and rigorous methodologies to ensure their clinical validity and reliability. Common performance metrics reported in the literature include accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, and the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) [
4,
5,
11,
17,
18]. Accuracy represents the overall proportion of ECG recordings that the AI model correctly classified [
4,
5,
11,
17,
18]. Sensitivity measures the model’s ability to correctly identify individuals who have a particular cardiac condition [
4,
5,
11,
17,
18]. Specificity measures the model’s ability to correctly identify individuals who do not have the condition [
4,
5,
11,
17,
18]. Precision indicates the proportion of individuals that the model identified as having the condition who actually have it [
4,
5,
11,
17,
18]. The F1-score provides a balanced measure of a model’s performance, particularly in imbalanced datasets [
4,
5,
11,
18]. The AUC-ROC is a graphical measure of a model’s ability to discriminate between different diagnostic outcomes, with a higher AUC indicating better performance [
4,
5,
11,
17,
18].
To rigorously evaluate the performance and generalizability of AI models, researchers employ various evaluation methodologies. Cross-validation techniques are commonly used to assess how well a model will perform on an independent, unseen dataset [
4,
5,
11,
17,
18]. External validation is another crucial step, which involves testing the trained AI model on completely independent datasets that were not used during the model development process [
5,
17,
18].
The diverse array of evaluation metrics used in the field reflects the multifaceted nature of assessing the performance of AI models in medical diagnosis. In this context, it is crucial to consider not only the model’s ability to correctly identify true positives but also its capacity to accurately classify true negatives, as both aspects are vital for ensuring the safety and efficacy of AI-driven diagnostic tools. The increasing emphasis on external validation underscores a growing recognition within the research community of the importance of ensuring that AI models are not only highly accurate on the data they were trained on but also robust and generalizable across a wide range of patient populations and clinical settings. This is a critical requirement for the successful translation of AI-ECG technologies into real-world clinical applications.
7. Current Challenges and Limitations in the Field
Despite the remarkable progress in AI-enhanced ECG analysis, several challenges and limitations continue to impede the widespread adoption and clinical translation of these technologies. One significant hurdle is the issue of data quality and availability. ECG signals are often susceptible to noise originating from various sources, such as muscle movements, electrical interference, and baseline drift, which can significantly compromise the accuracy of AI models. The lack of standardization in ECG recording protocols and data formats across different devices and institutions further complicates the development of universally applicable AI models. Moreover, many ECG datasets suffer from class imbalance, where the number of recordings for certain cardiac conditions is significantly lower than that of normal recordings. This imbalance can lead to biased AI models that perform poorly on underrepresented conditions. Additionally, inherent biases within the datasets themselves, such as the underrepresentation of specific patient populations, can limit the generalizability and fairness of AI algorithms.
Another critical challenge lies in ensuring the generalizability and robustness of AI models across diverse patient populations and clinical settings. The considerable inter-patient variability in ECG signals, influenced by factors such as age, gender, and underlying physiological conditions, can hinder the performance of AI models trained on a single, homogenous dataset when applied to more heterogeneous real-world scenarios. The performance of AI models often varies when tested on new datasets or implemented in different clinical environments, highlighting the need for rigorous external validation. Furthermore, the robustness of AI models against the inevitable presence of noise and artifacts in real-world ECG recordings remains a significant concern, as these imperfections can lead to misclassifications and unreliable diagnostic outputs.
The interpretability and explainability of deep learning models also pose a major challenge. Many of the state-of-the-art AI-ECG systems, particularly those based on deep neural networks, are often considered "black boxes" due to the complex and opaque nature of their decision-making processes. This lack of interpretability can significantly undermine the trust that clinicians have in these models, making them hesitant to rely on their outputs in critical clinical scenarios. To address this issue, the field of explainable AI (XAI) is actively being explored, with researchers developing techniques to provide insights into the reasoning behind AI-ECG diagnoses, aiming to increase transparency and build clinician confidence [
26].
The successful integration of AI-based ECG algorithms into clinical practice faces several organizational and regulatory hurdles [
27]. The transition from promising research findings to routine clinical use requires thorough validation in real-world settings, appropriate training for healthcare professionals, and the establishment of clear legal and regulatory frameworks to govern the deployment and use of these technologies. Finally, the trust and acceptance of AI in ECG recognition by clinicians are paramount for its successful implementation. Many clinicians express a lack of trust in current automated ECG interpretation systems, often citing concerns about their accuracy and reliability. While there is a general positive attitude towards the potential of future AI applications in cardiology, clinicians emphasize the importance of accuracy, interpretability, and usability as key factors for gaining their trust and facilitating the adoption of these technologies. Concerns about the potential for deskilling and the necessity for adequate workforce education to ensure the responsible use of AI in clinical practice also need to be addressed.
The challenges of data quality, generalizability, interpretability, and clinical integration are deeply interconnected and represent significant obstacles that must be overcome to realize the full potential of AI in ECG analysis. Addressing these limitations will not only pave the way for the widespread clinical adoption of these technologies but also ensure their safe and effective use in improving cardiac diagnostics and patient care. The lack of interpretability, in particular, stands out as a crucial barrier to building clinician trust, while the need for robust and diverse datasets underscores the importance of data sharing and collaboration to develop AI-ECG systems that are both reliable and equitable across all patient populations.
8. The Role of ECG Data Preprocessing and Feature Engineering in AI Recognition
The performance of AI models in electrocardiogram (ECG) recognition is significantly influenced by the quality of the input data and the effectiveness of feature extraction techniques. Therefore, ECG data preprocessing and feature engineering play a crucial role in developing accurate and robust AI-ECG systems.
Preprocessing techniques are essential for enhancing the quality of ECG data before it is used to train AI models. Noise reduction is a critical step, as ECG signals are often contaminated by various forms of noise that can obscure the underlying cardiac activity. Common noise reduction techniques include filtering methods such as Butterworth filters. Wavelet transform is another powerful technique that decomposes the ECG signal into different frequency components, allowing for the selective removal of noise while preserving important clinical information. Adaptive filtering methods have also been shown to be effective in reducing noise and artifacts in ECG recordings. In addition to traditional filtering techniques, deep learning approaches, such as autoencoders and generative adversarial networks (GANs), are increasingly being explored for their ability to effectively denoise ECG signals [
24].
Normalization is another important preprocessing step that involves rescaling and standardizing the ECG data to a consistent range. Techniques like Min-Max scaling and Z-score normalization are commonly used to ensure that all features contribute equally to the AI model’s learning process. Data augmentation techniques play a vital role in improving the robustness and generalizability of AI models, particularly when dealing with limited or imbalanced datasets. These techniques involve creating modified versions of the original ECG recordings by adding synthetic noise, applying time warping, and performing spatial or temporal inversions of the signals.
Feature engineering, the process of selecting and transforming raw data into features that can be effectively learned by AI models, is also crucial in ECG analysis. Traditional machine learning approaches often rely on handcrafted features extracted from the ECG signals. These features can be broadly categorized into time-domain features, such as heart rate variability and R-R intervals, which provide insights into the timing and regularity of heartbeats. Frequency-domain features, which are typically extracted using techniques like Fourier transform, provide information about the periodic components of the ECG signal. Time-frequency domain methods, such as wavelet transform, can capture both the temporal and frequency characteristics of the ECG signal, offering a more comprehensive representation. Higher-order statistics (HOS) can also be used to describe the morphology of ECG signals by measuring parameters like kurtosis and skewness.
In contrast to traditional machine learning, deep learning models have the capability to automatically learn relevant features directly from the raw ECG data through their multi-layered neural network architectures [
25]. This eliminates the need for manual feature engineering, as the deep learning models can identify complex patterns and representations within the ECG signals that might be difficult for humans to discern or design explicitly [
25]. Techniques such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) excel at automatically extracting hierarchical features from the raw ECG waveforms, while recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are adept at learning temporal dependencies within the sequential ECG data [
25].
The selection of appropriate preprocessing techniques and feature engineering methods is critical for the success of AI-based ECG recognition. By effectively reducing noise, extracting relevant features, and preparing the data in a suitable format, these steps can significantly enhance the performance, robustness, and generalizability of AI models in accurately classifying cardiac conditions and predicting cardiovascular events.
9. How Clinicians Use and Evaluate AI in ECG Recognition
The integration of artificial intelligence into electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation has the potential to significantly impact how clinicians diagnose and manage cardiac conditions. While AI has been incorporated into ECG machines for many years to provide automated interpretations, the accuracy of these traditional systems has often been limited, requiring careful overreading by physicians. However, recent advancements in machine learning and deep learning have led to the development of more sophisticated AI-powered ECG interpretation systems that can achieve accuracy levels comparable to or even exceeding those of expert cardiologists.
Clinicians are increasingly utilizing AI in ECG analysis for various purposes, including automating the identification of arrhythmias and acute myocardial infarctions, and for extracting subtle diagnostic insights that might be missed by the human eye. When evaluating these AI-ECG systems, clinicians consider several key factors, including the accuracy of the AI’s interpretations, the reliability and consistency of its performance across different patient populations and ECG recordings, and the interpretability of the model’s outputs [
27]. Trust in the AI algorithms is paramount for their acceptance and integration into clinical workflows [
27]. To foster this trust, explainable AI (XAI) techniques are increasingly being explored to provide clinicians with insights into the reasoning behind the AI’s diagnoses [
26].
Usability and the seamless integration of AI-ECG systems into existing clinical workflows are also critical aspects that clinicians consider when evaluating these tools [
27]. Systems that are intuitive to use and can be easily incorporated into the daily routines of healthcare professionals are more likely to be adopted and utilized effectively. Many clinicians also express a preference for AI interpretations that are presented visually, as these can aid in their understanding of the algorithm’s findings and enhance their confidence in the results.
While AI holds tremendous potential to augment and enhance ECG interpretation, the current landscape reveals a cautious yet optimistic approach from clinicians. There is a general lack of trust in the accuracy and reliability of traditional automated ECG interpretation systems. However, clinicians are largely positive about the future applications of AI in clinical decision-making, particularly if these systems can demonstrate high levels of accuracy and provide interpretable results. The focus on visual explanations and seamless integration into existing workflows underscores the importance of user-centered design in the development and implementation of AI-ECG technologies. Ultimately, the successful adoption of AI in ECG recognition will depend on building trust through transparency, ensuring usability, and demonstrating tangible improvements in diagnostic accuracy and patient care.
10. Conclusion
This literature review has illuminated the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence in electrocardiogram (ECG) recognition. The integration of AI, particularly through machine learning and deep learning methodologies, has demonstrated a transformative potential in enhancing the accuracy, efficiency, and accessibility of cardiac diagnostics. AI-ECG systems have shown remarkable capabilities in detecting and classifying a wide range of cardiac conditions, including arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, heart failure, Long QT Syndrome, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, often achieving performance levels that rival or surpass those of human experts.
The field has witnessed significant breakthroughs, such as the ability of AI to identify subtle ECG patterns indicative of hidden risks like atrial fibrillation and to predict future cardiovascular events. The development of AI algorithms for mobile and wearable ECG devices promises to extend cardiac monitoring beyond traditional clinical settings, enabling large-scale screening and personalized healthcare. The increasing sophistication of deep learning architectures, including CNNs, RNNs, and Transformer networks, coupled with advanced techniques in data preprocessing and feature engineering, continues to drive improvements in diagnostic accuracy and model robustness.
Despite these advancements, several challenges remain. Data quality and availability, the generalizability of AI models across diverse populations, the interpretability of deep learning systems, and the complexities of clinical integration and regulatory approval are critical hurdles that need to be addressed. Furthermore, building trust and ensuring acceptance among clinicians are paramount for the successful implementation of AI-ECG technologies in routine clinical practice. Future research directions are focusing on personalized medicine, explainable AI, multimodal data integration, and mitigating bias to unlock the full potential of AI in cardiology.
In conclusion, AI in ECG recognition holds immense promise for revolutionizing cardiac diagnostics and ultimately improving patient care. By addressing the current challenges and focusing on the promising avenues of future research, the field is poised to make significant strides in enhancing the accuracy, efficiency, and accessibility of ECG analysis, ushering in a new era of AI-driven precision cardiology.
References
- Thanigachalam, P.P.; Shah, R.U.; Siontis, K.C.; Noseworthy, P.A.; Attia, Z.I. Correction to: Artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiography as a predictor of future atrial fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 2023, 16, e012033. [Google Scholar]
- Taniguchi, T.; Tanaka, R.; Yamashita, S. Deep Learning Models for Predicting Left Heart Abnormalities From Single-Lead Electrocardiogram for the Development of Wearable Devices. Circulation Journal 2024, CJ-23-0216. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H.; Park, J.B.; Lee, K.H.; Kim, J.H.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, J.H. .. & Lee, S.H. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram Estimates Left Atrium Enlargement as a Predictor of Future Cardiovascular Disease. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024, 12, 455. [Google Scholar]
- Adedinsewo, D.A.; Scott, C.G.; Nelson, K.L.; Yao, X.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.; Hodge, D.O. . & Friedman, P.A. Accuracy of an artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram to detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction among patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 2021, 14, e008437. [Google Scholar]
- Attia, Z.I.; Kapa, S.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.; McKie, P.M.; Ladewig, P.M.; Satam, N.;... & Friedman, P.A. Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram. Nature medicine 2019, 25, 70–74.
- Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram with confidence degree for left ventricular dysfunction screening. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2022, 22, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Attia, Z.; Kapa, S.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.; McKie, P.; Ladewig, P.; Satam, N. ;... & Friedman, P. (2019). Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial. Medicine.
- Ono, M.; Nakachi, T.; Shimada, Y.; Koitabashi, T.; Izumi, T.; Mizuno, A. ;... & Kamiya, K. Prediction of In-Hospital Cardiac Death in Patients With Acute Heart Failure Using a Novel Artificial Intelligence–Based Electrocardiogram Score. JMIR Cardio 2024, 8, e52139. [Google Scholar]
- Adedinsewo, D.A.; Scott, C.G.; Nelson, K.L.; Yao, X.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.; Hodge, D.O. . & Friedman, P.A. Accuracy of an artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram to detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction among patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 2021, 14, e008437. [Google Scholar]
- Attia, Z.I.; Kapa, S.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.; McKie, P.M.; Ladewig, P.M.; Satam, N. . & Friedman, P.A. Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram. Nature medicine 2019, 25, 70–74. [Google Scholar]
- Adedinsewo, D.A.; Scott, C.G.; Nelson, K.L.; Yao, X.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.; Hodge, D.O. . & Friedman, P.A. Accuracy of an artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram to detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction among patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 2021, 14, e008437. [Google Scholar]
- Adedinsewo, D.A.; Scott, C.G.; Nelson, K.L.; Yao, X.; Lopez-Jimenez, F.; Hodge, D.O. . & Friedman, P.A. Screening for Cardiac Contractile Dysfunction Using an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram. National Medicine 2021, 25, 70–74. [Google Scholar]
- Fukushima, Y.; Nakashima, H. (2024). Physicians will discuss the findings of traditional tests like electrocardiograms and chest...[source](https://www.jmaj.jp/detail.php?id=10.31662/jmaj.2024-0190) 2023. Saito Y. et al.
- Hao, S.; Shah, A.J.; Siontis, K.C.; Noseworthy, P.A.; Attia, Z.I. Deep learning models for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy and classifying its causes using 12-lead and single-lead electrocardiograms. JAMA cardiology 2023, 8, 140–149. [Google Scholar]
- Krittanawasin, C.; Virani, S.S.; Tang, W.H.W. Artificial intelligence in cardiology: current applications and future directions. ACC Science & Practice 2024, 2. [Google Scholar]
- van den Heuvel, F.M.; van der Does, L.J.; van der Wall, E.E. Artificial intelligence in ECG diagnostics: where are we now? Cardiopractice 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Ko, W.Y.; Siontis, K.C.; Attia, Z.I.; Carter, R.E.; Asirvatham, S.J.; Friedman, P.A.; Noseworthy, P.A. Detection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using a convolutional neural network–enabled electrocardiogram. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2020, 75, 722–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siontis, K.C.; Wieczorek, M.A.; Maanja, M.; Hodge, D.O.; Kim, H.K.; Lee, H.J. . & Noseworthy, P.A. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy detection with artificial intelligence electrocardiography in international cohorts: an external validation study. European Heart Journal–Digital Health 2024, 5, 416–425. [Google Scholar]
- Qin, L.; Xie, Y.; Liu, X.; Yuan, X.; Wang, H. An end-to-end 12-leading electrocardiogram diagnosis system based on deformable convolutional neural network with good antinoise ability. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2021, 70, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.; Qin, L.; Tan, H.; Li, X.; Liu, B.; Wang, H. Automatic 12-leading electrocardiogram classification network with deformable convolution. In Proceedings of the 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine &, 2021, Biology Society (EMBC); pp. 882–885.
- Boulif, A.; Ananou, B.; Ouladsine, M.; Delliaux, S. A Literature Review: ECG-Based Models for Arrhythmia Diagnosis Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques. BioMedInformatics and Biology Insights 2023, 17, 11779322221149600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, S.; Abbas, S.G.; Saleem, M.A.; Khan, M.A. (2024). Autoencoder-based Arrhythmia Detection using Synthetic ECG Generation Technique.
- Khan, M.A.; Hussain, S.; Abbas, S.G.; Saleem, M.A. (2024). Leveraging Multi-Lead Electrocardiogram Data for Enhanced Arrhythmia Classification via Convolutional Neural Networks.
- Lin, C.S.; Rjoob, K.; Lin, C.H. ECG analysis. JMIR Medical Informatics 2022, 10, e38454. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y. Deep learning in myocardial infarction detection and localization based on ECG: A review. Information Fusion 2022, 83, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Latif, S.; Latif, A.; Ben Brahim, G.; Ammar, A. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: a survey on the state-of-the-art, challenges, and future directions. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2023, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Shrestha, S.; Sharma, S.; Gautam, S. Artificial intelligence in electrocardiogram analysis: A review. Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology 2021, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).