Recently, the move from cost-tied to open-access data has led to the mushrooming of research in pursuit of algorithms for estimating aboveground grass biomass (AGGB). Nevertheless, a comprehensive synthesis or direction on the milestones archived or an overview of how these models perform is lacking. This study synthesises the research work from decades of experiments in order to point researchers in the direction of what was done, the challenges faced, as well as how the models perform. A pool of findings from 108 remote sensing-based AGGB studies published from 1972 to 2020 show that about 62% of the remote sensing-based algorithms were tested in the Steppe grasslands, mostly in the temperate climate zone. An uneven annual publication yield was observed with approximately 36% of the research output from Asia whereas countries in the global south yielded few publications (<10%). Optical sensors, particularly MODIS, remain a major source of satellite data for AGGB studies, whilst studies in the global south rarely use active sensors such as Sentinel-1. Optical data tend to produce poor regression accuracies that are highly inconsistent across the studies compared to Radar. Vegetation indices, particularly the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), remain a major predictor variable. Predictor variables such as Sward height, Red edge position and Backscatter coefficients produced slightly consistent accuracies. Deciding on the optimal algorithm for estimating AGGB is daunting due to the lack of overlap in the grassland type, location, sensor types, and predictor variables, signalling the need for further studies around the transferability of remote sensing-based AGGB models.