Sort by
3D Concrete Printing in Kuwait: Stakeholder Insights for Sustainable Waste Management Solutions
Hanan Al-Raqeb,
Seyed Hamidreza Ghaffar
Posted: 03 December 2024
Advances in Composite Materials for Space Applications: A Comprehensive Literature Review
Konstantinos Tserpes
Posted: 03 December 2024
Study of Magnetron-Deposited Ta-Cu and Nb-Cu Coatings: Their Structure, Mechanical Properties, and Antimicrobial Behavior
Alexander Pogrebnjak,
Alexander Borisov,
Zhanar Tekebayeva,
Bauyrzhan Maratuly,
Alexey Jes,
Bagdat Azamatov,
Oleksandr Bondar,
Amina Mukhamedova
Posted: 03 December 2024
Three-Dimensional Dynamic Positioning Using a Novel Lyapunov-Based Model Predictive Control for Small Autonomous Surface/Underwater Vehicles
Daxiong Ji,
Somadina Godwin Ogbonnaya,
Sheharyar Hussain,
Ahmad Faraz Hussain,
Zhanying Ye,
Huiping Li,
Yuangui Tang,
Shuo Li
Posted: 03 December 2024
Real Estate Owners’ Early Thoughts on Lean Ipd Implementation in Spain
José Javier Gil Sebastián,
Manuel José Soler Severino
Posted: 03 December 2024
Effect of Deposition Temperature and Thermal Annealing on the Properties of Sputtered NiOx/Si Heterojunction Photodiodes
Roumen Nedev,
David Mateos-Anzaldo,
Eddue Osuna-Escalante,
Oscar Perez-Landeros,
Mario A. Curiel-Álvarez,
Esteban Osorio-Urquizo,
Jhonathan Castillo-Saenz,
Javier Lopez-Medina,
Benjamin Valdez-Salas,
Nicola Nedev
Posted: 03 December 2024
The Dissolution Behavior of Pyrite and Chalcopyrite in Their Mixture During Low-Temperature Pressure Oxidation: Kinetic Analysis
Kirill Karimov,
Maksim Tretiak,
Denis Rogozhnikov
Posted: 03 December 2024
Impact of Membrane Thickness on Characteristics of Biogas Dry Reforming Membrane Reactor Using Pd/Cu Membrane and Ni/Cr/Ru Catalyst
Akira Nishimura,
Mizuki Ichikawa,
Taisei Hayakawa,
Souta Yamada,
Ryoma Ichii,
Mohan Lal Kolhe
Posted: 03 December 2024
Do Preservation Values Conflict with Energy Optimization in Historic Buildings? Status and Potentials from a Danish Perspective
Jesper Ole Jensen,
Ole Michael Jensen,
Jesper Kragh
Posted: 03 December 2024
Design and Structural Analysis of Double-Helical Gear with Varying Helix Angle in ANSYS
Nusrat Lipi,
Zabin Tasnim,
Fahmida Tanjim,
Md. Insiat Islam Rabby
Double-helical gear is combined with the left and right-handed helical gears with the same twist angle, which smoothly transmits power between two parallel shafts on heavy loads for reduced noise and vibration operation. The helix angles influence the stress and deformation of double-helical gears before structural failures or breakdowns. Thus, variations in helix angles can result in wear, fatigue, increased stress, misalignment, and uneven load distributions. In this study, we modelled double-helical gear using SolidWorks software. By applying ANSYS 23.0, the effcets of helix angles on the stress distribution and overall performance were investigated. The evaluated data from both the ANSYS and AGMA (American Gears Manufacturing Association) approaches were compared, and this comparison achieved the result of a decrease in stress and strain with an increase in helix angle along the wider face width. At a helix angle of 30° and a constant value of face width, the stresses were found to be 1.4491 MPa and 1.5346 MPa for pressure angles of 20° and 14.5°, respectively, in ANSYS. After the comparison, discrepancies of 0.287% and 6.204% were identified between the evaluated stresses from the ANSYS and AGMA standards.
Double-helical gear is combined with the left and right-handed helical gears with the same twist angle, which smoothly transmits power between two parallel shafts on heavy loads for reduced noise and vibration operation. The helix angles influence the stress and deformation of double-helical gears before structural failures or breakdowns. Thus, variations in helix angles can result in wear, fatigue, increased stress, misalignment, and uneven load distributions. In this study, we modelled double-helical gear using SolidWorks software. By applying ANSYS 23.0, the effcets of helix angles on the stress distribution and overall performance were investigated. The evaluated data from both the ANSYS and AGMA (American Gears Manufacturing Association) approaches were compared, and this comparison achieved the result of a decrease in stress and strain with an increase in helix angle along the wider face width. At a helix angle of 30° and a constant value of face width, the stresses were found to be 1.4491 MPa and 1.5346 MPa for pressure angles of 20° and 14.5°, respectively, in ANSYS. After the comparison, discrepancies of 0.287% and 6.204% were identified between the evaluated stresses from the ANSYS and AGMA standards.
Posted: 03 December 2024
of 1,137