Sort by
From Cadaver to Console: Integrating Sonographic Anatomy Into the Core Medical Curriculum
Daniel John Doyle
Posted: 30 March 2026
Cytoskeletal Dynamics and Molecular Motor Dysfunction in Psychiatric Disorders: Insights from Schizophrenia and Autism Spectrum Disorder
Kenyu Nakamura
,Asumi Kubo
,Sae Sanaka
,Sara Kamiya
,Kentaro Itagaki
,Tetsuya Sasaki
Posted: 23 March 2026
Machine Learning Models for Identifying Muscle Oxygenation Abnormalities Across Activity States in People with Post-COVID Syndrome
Dimitrios Megaritis
,Emily Hume
,Enya Daynes
,Rachael Evans
,Yifeng Zeng
,Sally J. Singh
,Carlos Echevarria
,Peter D. Wagner
,Ioannis Vogiatzis
Posted: 23 March 2026
Optimizing Powerlifting Bench Press Technique Using Contextual Interference via Antagonist Task Selection
Simone Montenegro
,Pascal Izzicupo
,Iris Prestanti
,Sofia Serafini
,Andrea Fusco
,Francesco Sartor
Posted: 23 March 2026
Tempo and Mode in Exercise Execution
Douglas J. Roy
,Jody E. Roy
Posted: 11 March 2026
Integrative Multi-Omics Reveal Silymarin Alleviates Heat-Stress-Driven Hepatic Lipid Disruption in Laying Hens
Jiang Gao
,Hongrui Ren
,Xuanfu Wu
,Cunzhi Zou
,Bin He
,Wenqiang Ma
Posted: 27 February 2026
Models of the Human Heart for Biomedical Research: Opportunities and Challenges
Katrin Streckfuss-Bömeke
,Laura C Zelarayán
,Renate B Schnabel
,Nicolle Kränkel
,Christoph Maack
,Thomas Eschenhagen
,Hannah E Kappler
,Ursula Klingmüller
,Rafael Kramann
,Axel Loewe
+12 authors
Posted: 27 February 2026
Dance-Specific Patterns of Relative Oxygen Uptake in Elite Slovak Standard and Latin DanceSport Dancers
Matej Chren
,Milan Špánik
,Viktor Plačko
,Adéla Chlapcová
,Peter Olej
,Szymon Kuliś
Posted: 26 February 2026
How Do Faster and Slower Bench Press Eccentric Tempos Affect the Concentric Performance of Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes During High and Maximal Intensity Loads?
Renato Méndez-Delcanto
,Felipe J. Aidar
,Alfonso López Díaz-de-Durana
,Esteban Aedo-Muñoz
,Ciro José Brito
,Nuno Domingos Garrido
,Victor Machado Reis
,Pantelis T. Nikolaidis
Posted: 13 February 2026
Exercise Variation and Adaptive Resistance: The Motor Clutch Model
Douglas J. Roy
Posted: 12 February 2026
Age-Related Decline in Testicular Metabolism Beyond Organ Size Using FDG PET/CT
Mutlay Keskin
Posted: 11 February 2026
Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Bioinductive Collagen Implant Augmentation in Sugaya Type III Rotator Cuff Retears
Dau-Hee Lee
,Jae-Wook Park
,Jae-Sung Yoo
Posted: 11 February 2026
MRI and Ultrasound of the Thoracolumbar Fascia in the Settings of Degenerative Spinal Diseases
Noa Martonovich
,Clara De Luca
,Caterina Fede
,Andrea Angelini
,Pietro Ruggieri
,Carla Stecco
,Carmelo Pirri
Background and Objectives: The thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) has been implicated in low back pain, but imaging-based characterization in specific degenerative lumbar pathologies—particularly in surgical cohorts—remains limited. To evaluate TLF thickness on Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Ultrasound (US) across common lumbar pathologies, examine associations with age, body mass index, disability, and assess MRI–US agreement for TLF thickness. Materials and Methods: In this prospective single-centre cohort, adults scheduled for elective lumbar surgery underwent preoperative US (short- and long-axis at L3) and review of routine lumbar MRI (axial and sagittal T1-weighted measurements at L3) using standardized protocols. Disability was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Group comparisons, correlation analyses, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate between-diagnosis differences, patient-factor associations, and MRI–US agreement. Results: Thirty-seven patients were eligible (15 lumbar spinal stenosis, 5 discs herniations, 4 spondylolisthesis, 2 scoliosis, 9 revision surgeries, 2 trauma comparators). Median TLF thickness was 0.86 mm (0.16–1.40) on axial MRI, 1.12 mm (0.47–2.33) on sagittal MRI, 2.38 mm (1.01–5.91) on US short-axis, and 2.87 mm (1.12–5.74) on US long-axis. Axial MRI thickness differed across groups (p=0.010), driven by thinner measurements in trauma versus disc herniation (p=0.031); no significant group effects were observed on sagittal MRI or US. Age correlated positively with axial MRI thickness (p=0.021). No significant correlations were detected between ODI and TLF thickness on MRI or US. MRI–US agreement was poor, indicating the modalities are not interchangeable for TLF thickness measurement. Conclusions: TLF thickness measured on MRI and US did not consistently differentiate diagnostic groups and was not associated with disability. Thickness estimates differed substantially by modality, with poor MRI–US agreement. Larger studies with standardized acquisition and reliability testing are needed to clarify the clinical and mechanistic relevance of TLF imaging in degenerative lumbar disease and to determine whether it can support phenotype-based stratification within degenerative spine disease.
Background and Objectives: The thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) has been implicated in low back pain, but imaging-based characterization in specific degenerative lumbar pathologies—particularly in surgical cohorts—remains limited. To evaluate TLF thickness on Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Ultrasound (US) across common lumbar pathologies, examine associations with age, body mass index, disability, and assess MRI–US agreement for TLF thickness. Materials and Methods: In this prospective single-centre cohort, adults scheduled for elective lumbar surgery underwent preoperative US (short- and long-axis at L3) and review of routine lumbar MRI (axial and sagittal T1-weighted measurements at L3) using standardized protocols. Disability was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Group comparisons, correlation analyses, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate between-diagnosis differences, patient-factor associations, and MRI–US agreement. Results: Thirty-seven patients were eligible (15 lumbar spinal stenosis, 5 discs herniations, 4 spondylolisthesis, 2 scoliosis, 9 revision surgeries, 2 trauma comparators). Median TLF thickness was 0.86 mm (0.16–1.40) on axial MRI, 1.12 mm (0.47–2.33) on sagittal MRI, 2.38 mm (1.01–5.91) on US short-axis, and 2.87 mm (1.12–5.74) on US long-axis. Axial MRI thickness differed across groups (p=0.010), driven by thinner measurements in trauma versus disc herniation (p=0.031); no significant group effects were observed on sagittal MRI or US. Age correlated positively with axial MRI thickness (p=0.021). No significant correlations were detected between ODI and TLF thickness on MRI or US. MRI–US agreement was poor, indicating the modalities are not interchangeable for TLF thickness measurement. Conclusions: TLF thickness measured on MRI and US did not consistently differentiate diagnostic groups and was not associated with disability. Thickness estimates differed substantially by modality, with poor MRI–US agreement. Larger studies with standardized acquisition and reliability testing are needed to clarify the clinical and mechanistic relevance of TLF imaging in degenerative lumbar disease and to determine whether it can support phenotype-based stratification within degenerative spine disease.
Posted: 11 February 2026
The Protein Partitioning Model of Body Composition
Douglas Roy
,Jody Roy
Posted: 06 February 2026
An Axillary Arch Muscle Variant with Potential Neurovascular Implications
Alfonzo E Munoz
,Mathew Mendoza
,Madhan Kumar Soutallu Janakiram
,Chakravarthy M Sadacharan
,S M Niazur Rahman
Posted: 28 January 2026
3D Displacement of Upper Cervical Vertebrae in Severe Mandibular Deviation Caused by Condylar Hyperplasia: A Tomographic Segmentation Study
Claudia Milena Ramírez
,Rodrigo Cárdenas-Perilla
,Luis Eduardo Almeida
,Diego Fernando López
Posted: 19 January 2026
Protecting the Cerebellum from Ketamine-Induced Injury: Neuroprotective Effects of N-Acetylcysteine in Rats
Samson Oluwamuyiwa Alade
,Olakunle James Onaolapo
,Adejoke Yetunde Onaolapo
Posted: 07 January 2026
The Effects of Different Performance Enhancing Methods on Muscle Metabolism Post Exercise
Haywood Albert
Posted: 05 January 2026
Fascia: Organ, System, or Tissue? A Phenomenological Embryological Approach. A Critical Philosophical Paper on Fascia as a Domain not Fitting into the Usual Anatomical Mapping
Jaap C. Van Der Wal
,Graham Scarr
The term fascia encompasses more than just connective tissue: it creates cohesion, space, and freedom of movement. This, however, contrasts with classical anatomical and histological classifications that reduce the fascia to a set of separate connective tissue structures and describe it in the narrowest possible sense. A phenomenological analysis of embryonic development now suggests that fascia is better understood as the inner-tissue that forms a continuous multi-dimensional matrix and thereby lays the foundation for physical cohesion of the body. The fascia is then no longer just another discrete anatomical system but is characterized by its continuities and the prerequisite for the formation of all the body’s ‘parts’. This study posits that the so-called mesodermal germ layer is NOT one of three equivalent elements, but rather the mesenchymal inner-tissue dimension of the body: an organizing substrate within which the organs and tissues differentiate. The hypothesis that fascia forms the neurophysiological basis of ‘interoception’ is then questioned with the latter also appearing as a non-anatomical dimension analogous to the fascia. Understanding fascia from this broader perspective thus requires a consideration of embryonic development as a whole-body process: one in which the ‘inner-self’ differentiates into the recognizable organs and tissues of anatomy.
The term fascia encompasses more than just connective tissue: it creates cohesion, space, and freedom of movement. This, however, contrasts with classical anatomical and histological classifications that reduce the fascia to a set of separate connective tissue structures and describe it in the narrowest possible sense. A phenomenological analysis of embryonic development now suggests that fascia is better understood as the inner-tissue that forms a continuous multi-dimensional matrix and thereby lays the foundation for physical cohesion of the body. The fascia is then no longer just another discrete anatomical system but is characterized by its continuities and the prerequisite for the formation of all the body’s ‘parts’. This study posits that the so-called mesodermal germ layer is NOT one of three equivalent elements, but rather the mesenchymal inner-tissue dimension of the body: an organizing substrate within which the organs and tissues differentiate. The hypothesis that fascia forms the neurophysiological basis of ‘interoception’ is then questioned with the latter also appearing as a non-anatomical dimension analogous to the fascia. Understanding fascia from this broader perspective thus requires a consideration of embryonic development as a whole-body process: one in which the ‘inner-self’ differentiates into the recognizable organs and tissues of anatomy.
Posted: 05 January 2026
Monitoring Retinal Degeneration in a Porcine Model of Retinitis Pigmentosa with Spectral Domain Optical Oherence Tomography and Electroretinography
Wankun Xie
,Min Zhao
,Shu-Huai Tsai
,Maxwell G. Su
,Luke B. Potts
,Natalia J. Rosa
,Travis W. Hein
,Lih Kuo
,Robert H. Rosa
Posted: 01 January 2026
of 48