Sort by
Simulations of a Financial System Featuring Zipf-Mandelbrot Power Laws, Leverage Effects, Fat Tails, Covariance Structure and Long Memory: The Merton Model, Benchmark Asset Pricing Model or Hybrid Stochastic Pricing Model - Which Is Better?
David E. Allen
,Leonard Mushunje
,Shelton Peiris
Posted: 07 January 2026
Selected Digital Services in Building a Resilient and Sustainable Economy Ukraine's Experience Implications for European Union Countries
Magdalena Majchrzak
,Oleksandr Maslak
,Tetyana Maslak
,Jarosław Kozuba
,Marcin Podlewski
,Piotr Niedzielski
Posted: 06 January 2026
Technological Asymmetries and Financial Performance of Industrial Joint‑Stock Companies: AI‑Driven Risk Factors and Efficiency in Capital Management
Aneta Ejsmont
This article examines how technological asymmetries—understood as differences in access to advanced digital tools, AI capabilities and IT infrastructure—shape the financial stability and market performance of enterprises of various sizes. The study integrates comparative analyses of 100 industrial joint-stock companies from multiple countries, including technologically advanced large corporations and innovative SMEs, to assess how disparities in digitization and AI implementation influence financial resilience. Using multivariate regression models and index-based financial metrics such as MC, EV, P/E, PEG, P/S, P/B, EV/R and EV/EBITDA, the research identifies relationships between technological advancement, operational efficiency and risk exposure. The findings indicate that companies with higher levels of digitization and AI adoption demonstrate stronger resistance to market disruptions, more effective risk management and more favorable capital structures than SMEs with limited technological resources. However, restricted access to detailed operational data for smaller firms may affect the precision of comparative assessments. The study concludes that investments in digital competences and international cooperation enhance financial stability and support strategic decision-making, while SMEs play an important complementary role by providing outsourcing services that facilitate AI implementation in larger corporations.
This article examines how technological asymmetries—understood as differences in access to advanced digital tools, AI capabilities and IT infrastructure—shape the financial stability and market performance of enterprises of various sizes. The study integrates comparative analyses of 100 industrial joint-stock companies from multiple countries, including technologically advanced large corporations and innovative SMEs, to assess how disparities in digitization and AI implementation influence financial resilience. Using multivariate regression models and index-based financial metrics such as MC, EV, P/E, PEG, P/S, P/B, EV/R and EV/EBITDA, the research identifies relationships between technological advancement, operational efficiency and risk exposure. The findings indicate that companies with higher levels of digitization and AI adoption demonstrate stronger resistance to market disruptions, more effective risk management and more favorable capital structures than SMEs with limited technological resources. However, restricted access to detailed operational data for smaller firms may affect the precision of comparative assessments. The study concludes that investments in digital competences and international cooperation enhance financial stability and support strategic decision-making, while SMEs play an important complementary role by providing outsourcing services that facilitate AI implementation in larger corporations.
Posted: 06 January 2026
The Role of the Private Sector and MSMEs in Advancing the Circular Economy in Arid Metropolitan Regions
Abdulkarim K. Alhowaish
Posted: 06 January 2026
De-Dollarization of Central Bank Reserves in the World Economy: 2015–2025
Michael Connolly
,Juan Chen
,Zhaohong Yao
Posted: 06 January 2026
Managing Borderless Project Teams: PM Playbooks for Iterative Delivery
Abhi Gaikwad
Posted: 06 January 2026
Breaking the Urban Carbon Lock-in: The Effects of Heterogeneous Science and Technology Innovation Policies on Urban Carbon Unlocking Efficiency
Jingxiu Liu
,Min Yao
Posted: 06 January 2026
Impact of Corporate Governance Performance and Firm Financial Performance: Mediating Role of Leverage in Carbon-Intensive Firms in South Africa
Mziwendoda Cyprian Madwe
Posted: 06 January 2026
Risks on Sustainable Supply Chain and Logistics
Batoul Modarress-Fathi
,Alexander Ansari
,Al Ansari
Posted: 06 January 2026
Understanding ESG Ratings: A Systematic Literature Review of Methodologies, Divergences, Impact, Standardization, Disclosure Quality, Technology, and Global Financial Implications (2020–2025)
Hannan Vilchis Zubizarreta
,Delfor Tito Aquino
Purpose: This paper aims to systematically synthesize academic research published between 2020 and 2025 that investigates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and scores, with a focus on their methodologies, comparative performance, and impact on firm outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using the Lens.org scholarly database. A structured title search retrieved 334 open access journal articles published between 2020 and May 2025 containing the terms "ESG Score", "ESG Rating", or "ESG Rater". The PRISMA 2020 protocol guided the selection and screening process. Findings: The literature exhibits growing concern about the divergence among ESG ratings, the methodological opacity of rating providers, and the variable financial implications of ESG scores. Common themes include score disagreements, rating agency biases, and emerging models for standardizing ESG assessments. Originality: This review provides the most up-to-date synthesis of ESG rating literature, focusing exclusively on articles explicitly addressing ESG ratings or scores in their titles. It contributes clarity to the fragmented ESG measurement space by organizing findings around key methodological and evaluative debates.
Purpose: This paper aims to systematically synthesize academic research published between 2020 and 2025 that investigates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and scores, with a focus on their methodologies, comparative performance, and impact on firm outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using the Lens.org scholarly database. A structured title search retrieved 334 open access journal articles published between 2020 and May 2025 containing the terms "ESG Score", "ESG Rating", or "ESG Rater". The PRISMA 2020 protocol guided the selection and screening process. Findings: The literature exhibits growing concern about the divergence among ESG ratings, the methodological opacity of rating providers, and the variable financial implications of ESG scores. Common themes include score disagreements, rating agency biases, and emerging models for standardizing ESG assessments. Originality: This review provides the most up-to-date synthesis of ESG rating literature, focusing exclusively on articles explicitly addressing ESG ratings or scores in their titles. It contributes clarity to the fragmented ESG measurement space by organizing findings around key methodological and evaluative debates.
Posted: 05 January 2026
From Crisis to Recovery: Mental Health Service Demand in Alberta, Canada — A Policy Analysis with Illustrative Supply–Demand Modeling (2023–2024)
Kola Adegoke
,Abimbola Adegoke
,Deborah Dawodu
,Ayoola Bayowa
,Akorede Adekoya
,Temitope KAyode
,Mallika Singh
,Olajide Alfred Durojaye
,Abiodun Isola Aluko
,Adeyinka Adegoke
Posted: 05 January 2026
When Privacy Concerns Don’t Deter: How Brand Trust Enables Data Sharing in AI-Driven Green Marketing.
Yasir Fallatah
,Abdulaziz Fatani
,Talal Ameen Ali
Posted: 05 January 2026
Research on Dynamic Contagion of Banking Risks and Identification of Systemically Important Institutions—Based on the HD-TVP-VAR-DY Model
Cuicui Liu
,Huizi Ma
,Xiangrong Wang
,Shengnan Zhao
,Zhenyan Qin
Posted: 05 January 2026
The Digital Economy and Carbon Emissions in China: A Moderated EKC Analysis Incorporating Green Finance, Local Fiscal Pressure, and Climate Policy Uncertainty
Yixin Wang
,Shu-Kam Lee
,Kai-Yin Woo
Posted: 05 January 2026
Market Power and Multidimensional Efficiency in Banking: Diversification, Stability, and Digital–Governance Dynamics
Ari Warokka
,Jong Kyun Woo
,Dewi Sartika
,Aina Zatil Aqmar
Posted: 05 January 2026
Triangulated Analytical Framework for Sustainable FinTech Model: The Case of Latvia
Zakia Siddiqui
,Claudio Andres Rivera
Posted: 05 January 2026
A Methodological Framework for Rigorous Meta Ads Experimentation
Umer Hajam
Posted: 05 January 2026
Visibility Graph Analysis of Financial Time Series: A Comparative Study of Gas and Power Price Dynamics in the Italian Energy Market
Carlo Mari
,Emiliano Mari
Posted: 04 January 2026
Solver-Agnostic Convergence Certificates for DSGE Computation in Economics
Camilla Josephson
Posted: 02 January 2026
Determinants of Digital Banking Utilization in Addis Ababa: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach
Abebe Tilahun Kassaye
Posted: 02 January 2026
of 218