Sort by
A Deterministic Global Optimization Framework via Monte Carlo Region Integration: Rigorous Convergence, KKT Equivalence, and Multi-Objective Extension
Shin-Ichi Inage
,Kouei Ajito
Posted: 02 April 2026
Gauge Couplings of the Standard Model from First Principles in the Octonionic Framework
Tejinder P. Singh
Posted: 02 April 2026
On the Cross-Scale Prospects of the Logarithmically Corrected Gravitational Potential: From Black Hole Singularities to Galactic Rotation
Huang Hai
Posted: 02 April 2026
A Measure-Theoretic Formulation of Monte Carlo Stochastic Optimization: Unifying Continuous and Discrete Domains
Shin-Ichi Inage
Posted: 02 April 2026
Born's Rule from Record-Formation Constraints: A Conditional Uniqueness Theorem
Moses Rahnama
Posted: 01 April 2026
A Geometric Model of Human Life Trajectories
Michael I. Ojovan
Posted: 01 April 2026
Optimized Choice of Light Incidence Angles for the Determination of Optical Constants from Strongly Absorbing Thin Solid Films in a Narrow Spectral Range
Steffen Wilbrandt
,Olaf Stenzel
Posted: 01 April 2026
Scale Corrections to the ΛCDM Model to Explain a Time‐Dependent Dark Energy Density, and the Hubble and S8 Tensions
John Henderson
Posted: 01 April 2026
The Time Interval Only Set, Part 2
Harmen H. Hollestelle
Posted: 01 April 2026
Recovering Absolute Time in the Lorentz Transformation -The Apparent Nature of Relative Simultaneity
Andrew Wutke
Posted: 01 April 2026
Calorimetric Signature of Quantum Measurement: A Record-Formation Heat Bound and Differential Microcalorimetry Test
Moses Rahnama
Posted: 01 April 2026
Modular Entropy Retrieval in Black-Hole Information Recovery: A Proper-Time Saturation Model
Evlondo Cooper
Posted: 01 April 2026
Lesagian Gravity Redux?
Pier Franco Nali
Posted: 01 April 2026
Spontaneous BRST Symmetry Breaking in Infrared QCD
Angelo Raffaele Fazio
,Adam Smetana
Posted: 31 March 2026
Gibbs Energy Redistribution Theory (GERT): A Thermodynamic Cosmology for the Hubble Tension and Beyond
V. P. Dutra
Posted: 31 March 2026
Quantum Control of Metrological Quantities in Two-Component Bose–Einstein Condensates
Henan Wang
,Qimeng Zhang
,Hengyan Wang
,Hai-Jun Xing
,Yixiao Huang
Posted: 31 March 2026
Geometric Origin of the CMB Peaks in a 4-Simplex 3.998D Fractional Manifold Reality
Charles Opoku
We extend the 3.998D unified geometric framework into the territory of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation acoustic peaks. presenting a plausible alternative explanation that avoids reliance on ΛCDM’s the Big Bang, Bounce, or Inflation hypotheses. Having already demonstrated that a near-4D spectral geometry effectively reproduces all three generations of particle masses, while simultaneously accounting for galactic rotation curves and the Hubble tension. Demonstrating the framework’s universality is therefore seen as a logical next step. Here, we apply the same framework rules to reproduce both the positions (l) and power amplitudes (Dl) of the CMB peaks without invoking plasma acoustic mechanics. These values are derived from the spatial resonance within the manifold’s 4-simplex unit cell, where the primary peak (l1≈221.7) with a theoretical power amplitude of 5907 μK2 are determined aligning with the Planck 2018 observations (≈5750-5950). Subsequent power amplitudes for peak positions l2≈543.5, l3≈809.5 and l4 ~≈1109.5, are determined to be 1969 μK2, 2363 μK2, and 1082 μK2 respectively. Given that these values are practically indistinguishable from observations, the model offers a coherent causal origin for cosmological data and provides a more fundamental explanation than current 3D or 4D hypotheses.
We extend the 3.998D unified geometric framework into the territory of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation acoustic peaks. presenting a plausible alternative explanation that avoids reliance on ΛCDM’s the Big Bang, Bounce, or Inflation hypotheses. Having already demonstrated that a near-4D spectral geometry effectively reproduces all three generations of particle masses, while simultaneously accounting for galactic rotation curves and the Hubble tension. Demonstrating the framework’s universality is therefore seen as a logical next step. Here, we apply the same framework rules to reproduce both the positions (l) and power amplitudes (Dl) of the CMB peaks without invoking plasma acoustic mechanics. These values are derived from the spatial resonance within the manifold’s 4-simplex unit cell, where the primary peak (l1≈221.7) with a theoretical power amplitude of 5907 μK2 are determined aligning with the Planck 2018 observations (≈5750-5950). Subsequent power amplitudes for peak positions l2≈543.5, l3≈809.5 and l4 ~≈1109.5, are determined to be 1969 μK2, 2363 μK2, and 1082 μK2 respectively. Given that these values are practically indistinguishable from observations, the model offers a coherent causal origin for cosmological data and provides a more fundamental explanation than current 3D or 4D hypotheses.
Posted: 31 March 2026
Morphology-Driven SERS Activation in TMDCs: A Dual-Mode Platform for Sensorics and Theranostics
Nadezhda M. Belozerova
,Andrei A. Ushkov
,Dmitriy Dyubo
,Alexander V. Syuy
,Alexander I. Chernov
,Andrey A. Vyshnevyy
,Sergey M. Novikov
,Gleb I. Tselikov
,Aleksey V. Arsenin
,Vladimir G. Leiman
+1 authors
Posted: 31 March 2026
Deployment-Oriented Lithium-Ion Battery Remaining Useful Life Prediction with adaptive History Selection and Parameter-Efficient Updating
Dongxiao Ren
,Xinyu Zhong
,Zixiang Ye
,Xing-Liang Xu
Posted: 31 March 2026
Operational Certification Horizons in Quantum Transport: Copy Time, Conservation Laws, and a Rigorous Diffusive Benchmark
Sacha Mohamed
We introduce an operational transport latency, quantum information copy time: the earliesttime at which a receiver confined to a region B can certify, with prescribed advantage, whichof two global hypotheses was prepared by local operations in a distant sender region A. The benchmark quantity is information-theoretic—the Helstrom advantage on B, namely the tracedistance between the reduced states—and it also admits receiver-restricted refinements that makemeasurement constraints explicit, including few-body and moment-channel receivers. We derivethe corresponding kinematic locality constraints for Hamiltonian and Lindbladian dynamicswith Lieb–Robinson tails, as well as for circuits and quantum cellular automata with strictlight cones. We then establish the theorem-level anchor of the manuscript in the quantumsymmetric simple exclusion process (Q-SSEP): for locally prepared charge-biased hypotheses,the Helstrom copy time obeys an unconditional diffusion-limited lower bound expressed in termsof the diffusion constant D and the static susceptibility χ. For closed Hamiltonian systems,we formulate a projection-based reduction in which the operational scaling statement is made conditional on explicit, diagnostically checkable hypotheses, thereby separating what is provedmicroscopically from what is inferred in a controlled hydrodynamic window. We complement the analytical framework with exact-diagonalization diagnostics in the XXZ chain and with abundled TEBD/MPS reference protocol plus validation suite (Supplementary S2 and Code SC1),explicitly cross-validated against exact evolution at small sizes. In the strengthened submissionwe add three robustness layers beyond the original ED figures: an eight-size common-windowtransport sweep for the nonintegrable XXZ structure-factor diagnostic, an extractor-robustness check comparing first-crossing and sustained-crossing copy-time rules on the same Helstrom dataset, and a receiver-side validation dataset showing when a simple block-charge measurement saturates the Helstrom advantage in a controlled conserving reference model. Finally, we comparecopy time with scrambling diagnostics based on out-of-time-ordered correlators and show how conservation laws can delay certifiability well beyond the ballistic operator-growth front without any contradiction with locality.
We introduce an operational transport latency, quantum information copy time: the earliesttime at which a receiver confined to a region B can certify, with prescribed advantage, whichof two global hypotheses was prepared by local operations in a distant sender region A. The benchmark quantity is information-theoretic—the Helstrom advantage on B, namely the tracedistance between the reduced states—and it also admits receiver-restricted refinements that makemeasurement constraints explicit, including few-body and moment-channel receivers. We derivethe corresponding kinematic locality constraints for Hamiltonian and Lindbladian dynamicswith Lieb–Robinson tails, as well as for circuits and quantum cellular automata with strictlight cones. We then establish the theorem-level anchor of the manuscript in the quantumsymmetric simple exclusion process (Q-SSEP): for locally prepared charge-biased hypotheses,the Helstrom copy time obeys an unconditional diffusion-limited lower bound expressed in termsof the diffusion constant D and the static susceptibility χ. For closed Hamiltonian systems,we formulate a projection-based reduction in which the operational scaling statement is made conditional on explicit, diagnostically checkable hypotheses, thereby separating what is provedmicroscopically from what is inferred in a controlled hydrodynamic window. We complement the analytical framework with exact-diagonalization diagnostics in the XXZ chain and with abundled TEBD/MPS reference protocol plus validation suite (Supplementary S2 and Code SC1),explicitly cross-validated against exact evolution at small sizes. In the strengthened submissionwe add three robustness layers beyond the original ED figures: an eight-size common-windowtransport sweep for the nonintegrable XXZ structure-factor diagnostic, an extractor-robustness check comparing first-crossing and sustained-crossing copy-time rules on the same Helstrom dataset, and a receiver-side validation dataset showing when a simple block-charge measurement saturates the Helstrom advantage in a controlled conserving reference model. Finally, we comparecopy time with scrambling diagnostics based on out-of-time-ordered correlators and show how conservation laws can delay certifiability well beyond the ballistic operator-growth front without any contradiction with locality.
Posted: 31 March 2026
of 330