Article
Version 1
Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Entrance Fees and a Bayesian Approach to the St. Petersburg Paradox
Version 1
: Received: 16 February 2017 / Approved: 17 February 2017 / Online: 17 February 2017 (07:18:58 CET)
A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.
Marcondes, D.; Peixoto, C.; Souza, K.; Wechsler, S. Entrance Fees and a Bayesian Approach to the St. Petersburg Paradox. Philosophies 2017, 2, 11. Marcondes, D.; Peixoto, C.; Souza, K.; Wechsler, S. Entrance Fees and a Bayesian Approach to the St. Petersburg Paradox. Philosophies 2017, 2, 11.
Abstract
In his best-selling book An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, W. Feller established a way of ending the St. Petersburg Paradox by the introduction of an entrance fee, and provided it for the case in which the game is played with a fair coin. A natural generalization of his method is to establish the entrance fee for the case in which the probability of head is θ (0 < θ < 1/2). The deduction of those fees is the main result of Section 2. We then propose a Bayesian approach to the problem. When the probability of head is θ (1/2 < θ < 1) the expected gain of the St. Petersburg Game is finite, therefore there is no paradox. However, if one takes θ as a random variable assuming values in (1/2,1) the paradox may hold, what is counter-intuitive. On Section 3 we determine a necessary and sufficient condition for the absence of paradox on the Bayesian approach and on Section 4 we establish the entrance fee for the case in which θ is uniformly distributed in (1/2,1), for in this case there is paradox.
Keywords
St. Petersburg Paradox; entrance fees; Bayesian analysis
Subject
Business, Economics and Management, Econometrics and Statistics
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Comments (0)
We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.
Leave a public commentSend a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment