Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Brief Report

Longitudinal IgA and IgG Response, and ACE2 Binding Blockade, to Full-length SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Variants in a Population of Black PLWH Vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19

Altmetrics

Downloads

208

Views

63

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

supplementary.PDF (336.59KB )

Submitted:

25 December 2022

Posted:

09 January 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been pivotal in overcoming the Covid-19 pandemic yet understanding the subsequent outcomes and immunological effects remain crucial, especially for at-risk groups e.g. people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH). In this study we report the longitudinal IgA and IgG antibody titers, as well as antibody-mediated angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) binding blockade, against the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) proteins after 1 and 2 doses of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in a population of Black PLWH. Here, we report that PLWH (N = 103) did not produce an anti-S IgA response after infection or vaccination, however, anti-S IgG was detected in response to vaccination and infection, with the highest level detected for infected vaccinated participants. The anti-IgG and ACE2 blockade assays revealed that both vaccination and infection resulted in IgG production, however, only vaccination resulted in a moderate increase in ACE2 binding blockade to the ancestral S protein. Vaccination with a previous infection results in the greatest anti-S IgG and ACE2 blockade for the ancestral S protein. In conclusion, PLWH produce an anti-S IgG response to the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and/or infection, and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination with a previous infection produced more neutralizing antibodies than vaccination alone.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Immunology and Microbiology

1. Introduction

In response to the ongoing global 2019 coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, numerous vaccines have been developed with varying successes. The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine [1,2,3,4] contains a replication-deficient chimpanzee adenoviral vector that contains the sequence information of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) structural surface glycoprotein. South Africa has a high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) burden and recent findings suggests that Covid-19 increased the disease severity [5] for people living with HIV (PLWH). While Novavax NVX-CoV2327 vaccine efficacy was lower in PLWH (49%) compared to HIV-negative controls (60%) [6], safety and immunogenicity studies reveal that the ChAdOx1-nCoV19 vaccine was well tolerated in HIV-negative people and PLWH, and high responders retained neutralization to the B.1.351 (Beta; N501Y.v2) variant [4].
Since its emergence, the SARS-CoV-2 spike gene has accumulated numerous mutations that are major targets of the antibody response elicited by the vaccine. Variants containing the N501Y mutation are associated with increased affinity to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor, whereas variants containing the E484K and K417N mutations are associated with neutralizing antibody escape [7]. The B.1.1.7 (Alpha; N501Y.V1) variant was first identified in the United Kingdom and now also includes the E484K mutation. The B.1.351 variant was first identified in South Africa and contains 3 RBD mutations and 5 N-terminal mutations [8]. Pseudovirus neutralization assays indicate that 46% of convalescent serum samples were unable to neutralize the B.1.351 [9], which was corroborated in a live-virus neutralization assay neutralization assay [8].
In this study we employ a dual color microarray assay to assess the longitudinal Immunoglobulin A (IgA) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG) sero-response to the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine in a population of Black PLWH. We also employ microarray-based ACE2 blocking assay to determine how effective the vaccine is in producing antibodies that block ACE-binding to the ancestral, B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 S protein variants in Black PLWH.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study cohorts

This analysis forms part of randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 1B/2A trial (COV005), which assesses the safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in South Africa [4]. Briefly, between 17th August 2020 and 12th November 2020, PLWH were enrolled for safety and immunogenicity monitoring, which was at the end of the first South African pandemic wave and the beginning of the second wave when the B.1.351 variant was detected in individuals (Figure S1). Blood samples were collected for serological analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection from the longitudinal ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine trial of PLWH (N = 103), from seven South African research centers, hospitals and clinical trial centers in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines (Voysey et al., 2021), and stored at -80°C until serological analysis. The time course includes the collection of bloods from day 0 (D0) i.e. before vaccination (N = 171); day 28 (D28) i.e. 28 days after the first dose of the vaccine or placebo (N = 170); and day 42 (D42) i.e. 14 days after the second dose of the vaccine or placebo (N = 166). The participants were further classified based on a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, where a previous infection is defined as participants who were seropositive to the N protein at Day 0 according to the PPD study or had a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive result prior to Day 0. Any participants who had a positive or negative RT-PCR result between D0 and D42 were excluded. The demographic data for the PLWH are in Table S1. The participants were originally tested for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR, using upper respiratory tract samples.
The COV005 study was approved by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (ref: 20200407) and the ethics committees of the University of Oxford (ref: OxTREC 35-20), University of the Witwatersrand (ref 200501), Stellenbosch University (ref M20/06/009_COVID-19), and University of Cape Town (ref: 350/2020). The COV005 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04444674, and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, ACTR202006922165132. The trial protocol (version 6.0) is available online [4]. All patients provided written, informed consent.
For the serological assay set up, the pre-pandemic serum from patients who had active tuberculosis (TB) or active TB and HIV were utilized. The IgA and IgG serological assays included 46 pre-pandemic samples, and the ACE2 binding blockade assays included 27 pre-pandemic samples. The pre-pandemic bloods were collected in Cape Town, South Africa from 2011 to 2012, from a study approved by the HREC of the University of Cape Town (158/2010).

2.2. Printing the SARS-COV-2 spike variant protein microarrays

Printing details are available in the Supplementary material. Briefly, the SARS-CoV-2 S variant (ancestral, B.1.1.7, and B.1.351) protein microarrays were printed in a 24-plex format on streptavidin-coated glass slides (Nexterion, Schott) in a 3×3 microarray pattern. The slides were subsequently blocked and stored at -20°C until it was used in assays

2.3. Microarray assays: Detecting IgA and IgG in serum samples

IMMUsafe slides (Sengenics Corporation, Singapore) were removed from -20°C storage and blocked in blocking buffer (25 mM HEPES (MERCK), 50 mM KCl (MERCK), 20% glycerol (MERCK), 0.1% Triton X-100 (MERCK), 1 mM DTT (MERCK) and 50 µM biotin (Glentham Life Sciences)) for 1 hour. The slides were washed 2x 5 minutes in wash buffer (PBS and 0.2% Tween-20) and 2x 5 minutes wash in PBS (Gibco) only, then dried by centrifugation (Megafuge 40R, Thermo Scientific) at 1200 ×g for 2 minutes, and assembled in cleaned 24-plex gaskets (GraceBio). The serum samples were thawed on ice and diluted 1:50 in incubation buffer (PBS, 0.2% Tween-20, 1% BSA and 1% milk powder (MERCK), and then incubated on the microarray for 1 hour at room temperature shaking at 100 rotations per minute (RPM) (Orbital Shaker SO3, Stuart Scientific). The slides were subsequently washed 3x 5 minutes in wash buffer, and incubated with 1.25 µg/ml Alexa fluor 555-labelled anti-human IgA and 1.25 µg/ml Alexa fluor 647-labelled anti-human IgG (ThermoFisher) (in incubation buffer) for 30 minutes. Microarrays were rinsed thrice, and then 2x 5 minutes in Wash buffer and 2x 5 minutes wash in PBS only, then dried by centrifugation at 1200 ×g for 2 minutes.

2.4. Data extraction and analysis: Detecting IgA and IgG responses

The slides were scanned with InnoScan 710 scanner (Innopsys, Carbonne, France) at 10 µm resolution, 5% gain and 5 mW power for the 635 nm laser and 10% gain and 10 mW power for the 532 nm laser to generate 16-bit TIFF images, and the raw data (.gpr file format) extracted with the MAPIX software Version (Innopsys, Carbonne, France).
Data pre-processing was done using an in-house developed R script. For each spot, the neighborhood background relative fluorescent units (RFU) was subtracted from the foreground RFU to obtain a net RFU. A background threshold was applied whereby any foreground signals ≤ neighborhood background plus 2 standard deviations were zeroed. The mean-value, standard deviation and co-efficient of variation (CV) was obtained for triplicate spots of each protein. If the CV ≥20%, the CV of the two spots with the lowest CV is obtained. If the CV remains ≥20% for any probes, the sample is re-assayed. The reciprocal titer was calculated as described before and the cumulative titer calculated for the N protein by summing the RFU values for epitope 1, epitope 2, epitope 3, NTD and CTD; N protein epitopes and construct sequences has been published [10]. Cohort threshold values for the N protein constructs were obtained using the OptimalCutpoints package with an emphasis on maximizing specificity [11], whereas the threshold-values for the S protein was obtained using the average plus 2x standard deviation of the pre-pandemic samples. Samples with RFU-values greater than these N and S protein thresholds were considered IgA- and/or IgG-positive for the respective protein.
The longitudinal anti-S IgA and IgG response in participants were assessed based on whether they had a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection or not, and whether they received the placebo or the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine.

2.5. Gene synthesis and cloning of the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral, B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 Spike protein variants

The cDNA of SARS-CoV-2 S genes, positions 1-1273, of MN908947.3 (Wuhan-hu-1), B.1.1.7 (England/204820464/2020) (Alpha) and B.1.351 (South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020) (Beta) were chemically synthesized (GeneArt, ThermoFisher Scientific). For the recombinant expression of correctly assembled intact S protein in vivo, R682S mutation was included with the synthesized cDNA sequences to prevent the furin mediated S1/S2 cleavage within the S protein.
The cDNA was cloned into a proprietary Escherichia coli/Spodoptera frugiperda transfer vector, pPRO8, such that the construct encoded the full-length N protein as an in-frame fusion to a C-terminal Biotin Carboxyl Carrier Protein (BCCP) fused to a c-Myc. pPRO8 is a derivative of pTriEx1.1 (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) and encodes the E. coli BCCP domain (amino acids 74–156 of the E. coli accB gene) downstream of a viral polyhedrin promoter and cloning sites; flanking this polh-BCCP expression cassette are the baculoviral 603 gene and the 1629 genes to enable subsequent homologous recombination of the construct into a replication-deficient baculoviral genome [12].

2.6. Derivatisation of ACE2 with Alexa fluor 647 NHS ester

The vial of 179 µl recombinant ACE2 (Raybiotech) was buffer exchanged thrice with 500 µl 0.1M sodium bicarbonate (Glentham Life Sciences) using the 0.5 ml 30K Amicon Ultra centrifugal columns (MERCK) at 15000 ꓫg for 10 minutes, with the final volume at 20 µl remaining in the spin column. Immediately before use, the Alexa fluor 647 NHS ester (ThermoFisher Scientific) was diluted to 10 mg/ml in DMSO (Glentham Life Sciences) and 2 µl was added to the recombinant ACE2 in the spin column. The spin columns were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with gentle shaking and protected from light. Thereafter, the protein was buffer-exchanged thrice with 500 µl phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Gibco) using the 0.5 ml 30K Amicon Ultra centrifugal columns (MERCK) at 15000 ꓫg for 10 minutes, with the final volume at 20 µl remaining in the spin column. The protein concentration and protein-to-dye ratio was determined by nanodrop (NanoDrop One, Thermo Scientific), and the protein was diluted to 2 µM in PBS and stored in 15 µg aliquots at -20°C.

2.7. Microarray assays: Neutralization assay of serum samples, and detecting recombinant protein spots with anti-his antibody

The S protein variant microarray slides were removed from -20°C storage and washed 2x 5 minutes in wash buffer and 2x 5 minutes wash in PBS only, then dried by centrifugation at 1200 ×g for 2 minutes, and assembled in cleaned 24-plex gaskets. The serum samples were removed from -80°C, thawed on ice then diluted 1:50 in ACE2 buffer (6 nM AF647-ACE2 in PBS, 0.2% Tween-20, 1% BSA and 1% milk powder) and incubated on the microarray for 1 hour at room temperature shaking at 100 RPM. The slides were subsequently washed 3x 5 minutes in wash buffer, and incubated with 5 µg/ml Cy3-anti-human IgG (in incubation buffer) for 30 minutes. Microarrays were rinsed thrice, and then 2x 5 minutes in wash buffer and 2x 5 minutes wash in PBS only, then dried by centrifugation at 1200 ×g for 2 minutes. Each recombinant protein probe on the microarray, which contains a his-tag, was detected by incubating a single microarray with 20 µg/ml Alexa fluor 647-anti-6xhis antibody (ThermoFisher) in incubation buffer for 30 minutes at room temperature, shaking at 100 RPM. Microarrays were rinsed thrice, and then washed 2x 5 minutes in Wash buffer and 2x 5 minutes in PBS only, then dried by centrifugation at 1200 ×g for 2 minutes.

2.8. Data extraction and analysis: Neutralization assay for serum samples

The slides were scanned with InnoScan 710 scanner (Innopsys, Carbonne, France) at 10 µm resolution, 50% gain and 10 mW power for the 635 nm laser and 5% gain and 10 mW power for the 532 nm laser to generate 16-bit TIFF images. The microarray incubated with the Alexa fluor 647-anti-6xhis antibody was scanned at 10 µm resolution, 50% gain and 10 mW power with the 635 nm laser to generate 16-bit TIFF images. All raw data (.gpr file format) were extracted with the MAPIX software Version (Innopsys, Carbonne, France). Data pre-processing was done as described above. Thereafter, the amount of recombinant S protein of the ancestral, B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 protein loaded on the microarray chip was normalized using the relative intensities for each protein obtained from the anti-his assay.
The longitudinal change in the anti-S IgG levels was determined by the change in IgG for the RFU, whereas the ID50-values were assessed for ACE2 binding; the ID50-values were obtained by dividing 50% of ACE2 RFU binding in a buffer only control (i.e. no serum) by the ACE2 RFU binding for the serum sample multiplied by the serum dilution factor. The ID50-value is therefore inversely proportional to the amount of ACE2 bound to the S protein. The threshold for participants with an IgG response and ACE2 blockade was the same as determine for IgA and IgG responses (described above). The percentage of patients that have antibodies that block ACE2 binding was assessed for the S protein of the ancestral, B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 SARS-CoV-2 strains to assess vaccine efficacy against multiple variants.

3. Results

3.1. ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine produces anti-S IgG, but not anti-S IgA, in vaccinated PLWH

Baseline anti-S IgA levels were detected throughout the time course for uninfected placebo receiving (D0 = 1448.0 RFU; D28 = 1585.7 RFU; D42 = 1396.1 RFU), uninfected vaccinated (D0 = 1415.6 RFU; D28 = 1420.6 RFU; D42 = 1401.0 RFU), infected placebo receiving (D0 = 1686.2 RFU; D28 = 1614.4 RFU; D42 = 1882.6 RFU), and infected vaccinated (D0 = 1545.0 RFU; D28 = 1675.0 RFU; D42 = 1554.0 RFU) PLWH (Figure 1). In contrast, a group of HIV-negative uninfected placebo-receiving (D0 = 1531.1 RFU; D28 = 1636.7 RFU; D42 = 1551.4 RFU) and vaccinated (D0 = 1446.3 RFU; D28 = 1477.6 RFU; D42 = 1330.8 RFU) participants produced baseline IgA, but infected placebo-receiving (D0 = 1928.8 RFU; D28 = 1795.2 RFU; D42 = 2237.7 RFU) and vaccinated (D0 = 1256.9 RFU; D28 = 2040.4 RFU; D42 = 1256.9 RFU) participants have increased IgA levels over the time course (Figure S2). Together these results indicate that PLWH might produce a short-lived or no anti-S IgA in response to infection, vaccination or a combination of the two.
The uninfected placebo-receiving group produced baseline anti-S IgG levels throughout time course (D0 = 3772.7 RFU; D28 = 3698.8 RFU; D42 = 3408.2 RFU), whereas the uninfected vaccinated group had increased IgG from D28 (4116.8RFU), which increased further at D42 (4543.4 RFU), indicating that the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine successfully induces IgG production after 1 dose, which further increases after 2 doses in PLWH. The infected placebo-receiving group had increased IgG levels at D28 (5159.9 RFU) which plateaued; interestingly, these IgG levels were higher than the IgG levels after 2 doses in uninfected vaccinated individuals. The infected vaccinated individuals produced the highest IgG levels after 1 vaccine dose at D28 (10667.2 RFU), which plateaued, suggesting that vaccination with a prior infection results in better protection than a previous infection or vaccination alone (Figure 1).
The uninfected participants did not produce an anti-N IgA or IgG response; however, all infected groups had decreasing antibody levels to the N protein (Figure S3). The percentage of participants with an anti-S IgA or IgG response was also assessed and revealed, much like the RFU values, that uninfected participants produce an IgG response post-vaccination, and that a prior infection results in more participants with an IgG response, and that a prior infection with vaccination results in 100% of patients producing IgG against the S protein (Figure S4).

3.2. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination with a previous infection results in more antibodies that blocks ACE2 binding than vaccination alone for the ancestral, B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 S protein variants

Figure 2a represents the anti-S IgG response of participants towards the ancestral, B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants. Uninfected placebo-receiving participants did not produce an increased IgG response to the S proteins for the ancestral, B.1.1.7 or B.1.351 strains; however, uninfected vaccinated participants produced increased IgG to the S protein for the ancestral strain over the time course, and to a lesser extent towards the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 strains. Infected placebo-receiving patients increased IgG towards the ancestral strain, and a lower response to the B.1.351 strain. Infected vaccinated participants produced high IgG levels in response to the ancestral S protein from D28, which plateaued. Interestingly, IgG was also produced against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants, but to a higher extent against the B.1.351 variant S protein, suggesting that the ChAdOx1-nCoV19 might result in better protection against the B.1.351 than the B.1.1.7 variant in PLWH. Figure 2b represents the ACE2 blockade of antibodies of participants towards the S protein of the ancestral, B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 SARS-CoV-2 variants. Uninfected placebo-receiving participants did not produce antibodies that block ACE2 binding, however, uninfected vaccinated participants produced a marginal increase in the levels antibodies that block ACE2 binding. Similarly, infected placebo-receiving participants did not produce antibodies that block ACE2 binding; however, infected vaccinated participants produced antibodies that block ACE2 binding to the S protein for all strains, but highest binding to the ancestral strain, then the B.1.351 and then the B.1.1.7. These results indicate that while infection results in greater anti-S IgG production than vaccination, the vaccination induces the production of more neutralizing antibodies.
The percentage of participants that both produced IgG and blocked ACE2 binding was assessed to determine the percentage of participants that produce neutralizing antibodies (Figure 3). The percentage of uninfected placebo-receiving patients remained low and largely unchanged. The percentage of uninfected vaccinated participants with IgG that block ACE2 binding increased over the time course with the greatest increase for the ancestral S protein, suggesting that the vaccine may offer greatest protection against the ancestral strain, but blockade against the B.1.1.7 was seen from D28 and B.1.351 from D42, suggesting that ChAdOx1-nCoV19 vaccine may offer protection against these, and perhaps other strains as well. The percentage of infected placebo-receiving patients that had anti-S IgG and ACE2 blockade was relatively high for all strains. The percentage of participants with anti-S IgG and ACE2 blockade at D0 are similar for infected placebo-receiving and vaccinated participants; however, the percentage increase markedly for vaccinated participants at D28 (ancestral = 93.3%; B.1.1.7 = 93.3%; B.1.351 = 80%) compared to placebo-receiving patients (ancestral = 47.1%; B.1.1.7 = 47.1%; B.1.351 = 17.6%) and reaches 100% for ancestral, but decreases to 86.7% for B.1.1.7 and 80% for B.1.351, after the second dose. These results support the hypothesis that a 1 dose of the ChAdOx1 nCov-2 vaccine with a previous infection, results in greater protection than infection or ChAdOx1 nCov-2 vaccination alone.

4. Discussion

Reports on the effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in PLWH are increasing [13], but still scarce. In this study we present the quantitative IgA and IgG responses, as well as ACE2 binding blockade, against S protein variants in Black PLWH in response to the ChAdOx1-nCov19 vaccine. Our results indicate that, in contrast to their HIV-negative counterparts, PLWH did not produce a detectable anti-S IgA response with an infection or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. Previous reports indicate that while IgG production and neutralization becomes dominant later, the IgA response reportedly persists 28 days post-symptom onset [14], and ChAdOx1 nCov19 vaccination reportedly induces anti-S IgA production in study volunteers, which peaks at 28 days post vaccination [15]. The anti-S IgA response for HIV-negative participants indicate that an anti-S IgA response is detectable by our assays, but were not detected for both infected and vaccinated PLWH. A previous study reported that serum anti-RBD IgA response precedes the IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and is reportedly more potent in their neutralization compared to IgG in early stage SARS-CoV-2, i.e. the first week after symptom onset [14]. This means that PLWH might not have the early stage IgA-induced neutralization - and therefore likely protection afforded thereby - of their HIV-negative counterparts.
In contrast, an anti-S IgG response was detected for both infection and vaccination PLWH; however a previous infection results in greater IgG production than vaccination alone, and that a vaccination with a previous infection results in greater IgG levels, indicating that ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccinated PLWH still have serum IgG protection.
A previous study revealed that the concentration of neutralizing antibodies predicts protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection [16]. Thus, assessing the presence and change in neutralizing antibodies in vaccinated individuals may predict protective outcomes, which is especially important for at-risk groups, including PLWH. Our results indicate that ChAdOx1-nCoV2 vaccination results in anti-S IgG production against the ancestral, but to a much lower extent against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 strains. Interestingly, the vaccine results in greater anti-S IgG production for the B.1.351 than the B.1.1.7 strain, suggesting that the B.1.1.7, and perhaps other strains with similar mutations may escape ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine-induced protection more efficiently in PLWH. The results further reveal that while infection and vaccination results in anti-S (ancestral) IgG, only vaccinated participants produce increasing antibody levels that block ACE binding. These findings indicate that the ChAdOx1 nCoV_19 vaccine results in the production of neutralizing antibodies, but that ACE blockade was marginal in vaccinated PLWH. Importantly, the results indicate that vaccination with a previous infection results in the highest IgG levels which is also reflected in the extent of ACE2 ID50-values for the same patients. Together, these results indicate that one dose of the ChAdOx1-nCoV2 vaccine with a previous infection offers greatest protection in PLWH.
Whether the absence of measurable anti-S IgA response in blood following vaccination or natural infection in PLWH observed here reflects a fundamental difference in B-cell responses in PLWH due to perturbation of CD4+ T-cell responses, or whether the anti-S IgA response is simply shorter-lived in PLWH than in HIV-negative participants remains to be determined. Follow-on studies will also be needed to explore whether an anti-S IgA response is detectable at the site of disease, i.e. the lungs, following natural infection, as well as whether absence of an anti-S IgA response in blood or mucosal samples correlates with increased susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in PLWH.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org., Figure S1: Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 lineages in South Africa; Figure S2: Longitudinal IgA towards SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in HIV-negative participants; Figure S3: Longitudinal IgA and IgG towards SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein; Figure S4: Longitudinal IgA and IgG response, and ACE2 binding blockade to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; Table S1: Demographics for people living with HIV (PLWH).

Author Contributions

J.M.B and S.M. conceptualized the study; M.S., G.K., A.I., S.A.M., J.B. designed the study; C.C., K.A., V.B., S.B., Q.B., C.B., E.L., K.D., L.F., and A.K. are trial site principal investigators and enrolled participants and collected clinical data; A.N. cloned and expressed the proteins; M.S. ran the microarray assays; M.S and A.I. performed bioinformatic analysis; J.M.B, S.M., M.S. G.K and A.I. interpreted the data; M.S., J.M.B., G.K., A.I., A.N. and S.M. wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript

Funding

This research was funded by J.M.Bs NRF SARCHI grant (grant no. 64760) and SAMRC grant (grant number 96838).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The COV005 study was approved by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (ref: 20200407) and the ethics committees of the University of Oxford (ref: OxTREC 35-20), University of the Witwatersrand (ref 200501), Stellenbosch University (ref M20/06/009_COVID-19), and University of Cape Town (ref: 350/2020). The COV005 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04444674, and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, ACTR202006922165132. The pre-pandemic bloods were collected in Cape Town, South Africa from 2011 to 2012, from a study approved by the HREC of the University of Cape Town (158/2010). All patients provided written, informed consent.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the participant(s).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all participants in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

J.M.B. is an employee of Sengenics Corporation, who market a Protein Array product developed in part based on results generated in this study. That product was however not used in this study.

References

  1. Cagigi, A.; Nilsson, A.; Pensieroso, S.; Chiodi, F. Dysfunctional B-Cell Responses during HIV-1 Infection: Implication for Influenza Vaccination and Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tegally, H.; Wilkinson, E.; Giovanetti, M.; Iranzadeh, A.; Fonseca, V.; Giandhari, J.; Doolabh, D.; Pillay, S.; San, E.J.; Msomi, N.; et al. Emergence and Rapid Spread of a New Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Lineage with Multiple Spike Mutations in South Africa. Epidemiology 2020, preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Waters, L.J.; Pozniak, A.L. COVID-19 Death in People with HIV: Interpret Cautiously. Lancet HIV 2021, 8, e2–e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Madhi, S.A.; Koen, A.L.; Izu, A.; Fairlie, L.; Cutland, C.L.; Baillie, V.; Padayachee, S.D.; Dheda, K.; Barnabas, S.L.; Bhorat, Q.E.; et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 NCoV-19 (AZD1222) Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in People Living with and without HIV in South Africa: An Interim Analysis of a Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1B/2A Trial. Lancet HIV 2021, 8, e568–e580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Karim, F.; Gazy, I.; Cele, S.; Zungu, Y.; Krause, R.; Bernstein, M.; Khan, K.; Ganga, Y.; Rodel, H.E.; Mthabela, N.; et al. HIV Status Alters Disease Severity and Immune Cell Responses in Beta Variant SARS-CoV-2 Infection Wave. eLife 2021, 10, e67397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shinde, V.; Bhikha, S.; Hoosain, Z.; Archary, M.; Bhorat, Q.; Fairlie, L.; Lalloo, U.; Masilela, M.S.L.; Moodley, D.; Hanley, S.; et al. Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1899–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wibmer, C.K.; Ayres, F.; Hermanus, T.; Madzivhandila, M.; Kgagudi, P.; Oosthuysen, B.; Lambson, B.E.; de Oliveira, T.; Vermeulen, M.; van der Berg, K.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 Escapes Neutralization by South African COVID-19 Donor Plasma. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 622–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Voysey, M.; Clemens, S.A.C.; Madhi, S.A.; Weckx, L.Y.; Folegatti, P.M.; Aley, P.K.; Angus, B.; Baillie, V.L.; Barnabas, S.L.; Bhorat, Q.E.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 NCoV-19 Vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An Interim Analysis of Four Randomised Controlled Trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. The Lancet 2021, 397, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Krammer, F.; Srivastava, K.; Alshammary, H.; Amoako, A.A.; Awawda, M.H.; Beach, K.F.; Bermúdez-González, M.C.; Bielak, D.A.; Carreño, J.M.; Chernet, R.L.; et al. Antibody Responses in Seropositive Persons after a Single Dose of SARS-CoV-2 MRNA Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1372–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Smith, M.; Abdesselem, H.B.; Mullins, M.; Tan, T.-M.; Nel, A.J.M.; Al-Nesf, M.A.Y.; Bensmail, I.; Majbour, N.K.; Vaikath, N.N.; Naik, A.; et al. Age, Disease Severity and Ethnicity Influence Humoral Responses in a Multi-Ethnic COVID-19 Cohort. Viruses 2021, 13, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. López-Ratón, M.; Rodríguez-Álvarez, M.X.; Suárez, C.C.; Sampedro, F.G. OptimalCutpoints:An R Package for Selecting Optimal Cutpoints in Diagnostic Tests. J. Stat. Softw. 2014, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Blackburn, J.M.; Shoko, A.; Beeton-Kempen, N. Miniaturized, Microarray-Based Assays for Chemical Proteomic Studies of Protein Function. In Chemical Genomics and Proteomics: Reviews and Protocols; Methods in Molecular Bi-ology; Zanders, E.D., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khan, K.; Lustig, G.; Bernstein, M.; Archary, D.; Cele, S.; Karim, F.; Smith, M.; Ganga, Y.; Jule, Z.; Reedoy, K.; et al. Immunogenicity of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection and Ad26.CoV2.S Vaccination in People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 75, e857–e864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sterlin, D.; Mathian, A.; Miyara, M.; Mohr, A.; Anna, F.; Claër, L.; Quentric, P.; Fadlallah, J.; Devilliers, H.; Ghillani, P.; et al. IgA Dominates the Early Neutralizing Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barrett, J.R.; Belij-Rammerstorfer, S.; Dold, C.; Ewer, K.J.; Folegatti, P.M.; Gilbride, C.; Halkerston, R.; Hill, J.; Jenkin, D.; Stockdale, L.; et al. Phase 1/2 Trial of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine ChAdOx1 NCoV-19 with a Booster Dose Induces Mul-tifunctional Antibody Responses. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Khoury, D.S.; Cromer, D.; Reynaldi, A.; Schlub, T.E.; Wheatley, A.K.; Juno, J.A.; Subbarao, K.; Kent, S.J.; Triccas, J.A.; Davenport, M.P. Neutralizing Antibody Levels Are Highly Predictive of Immune Protection from Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1205–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Preprints 66600 g001
Figure 1. Longitudinal change in IgA and IgG against the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral spike (S) protein in response to the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinated in people living with HIV (PLWH). The average RFU is represented and the error bars indicate the minimum and maximum values.
Figure 1. Longitudinal change in IgA and IgG against the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral spike (S) protein in response to the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinated in people living with HIV (PLWH). The average RFU is represented and the error bars indicate the minimum and maximum values.
Preprints 66600 g001
Preprints 66600 g002
Figure 2. The longitudinal (Day 0, Day 28 and Day 42) IgG production (a) and ACE2 blockade (b) against S protein of people living with HIV (PLWH) was assessed for vaccinated and placebo-receiving patients, with or without a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The IgG was detected Cy3-labelled anti-human IgG and detected at 532 nm, whereas the ACE2 binding was detected AF647-labelled ACE2 and detected at 635 nm. The average relative fluorescence units (RFU) or ID50 is represented and the error bars indicate the minimum and maximum RFU values.
Figure 2. The longitudinal (Day 0, Day 28 and Day 42) IgG production (a) and ACE2 blockade (b) against S protein of people living with HIV (PLWH) was assessed for vaccinated and placebo-receiving patients, with or without a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The IgG was detected Cy3-labelled anti-human IgG and detected at 532 nm, whereas the ACE2 binding was detected AF647-labelled ACE2 and detected at 635 nm. The average relative fluorescence units (RFU) or ID50 is represented and the error bars indicate the minimum and maximum RFU values.
Preprints 66600 g002
Preprints 66600 g003
Figure 3. The graph depicts the longitudinal (Day 0, Day 28 and Day 42) change in the percentage of participants with both an IgG response and who have antibodies that blocked ACE2 binding to the ancestral, B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variants. Participants were assessed by subdividing into those with or without a previous infection, and whether they received the vaccine or placebo.
Figure 3. The graph depicts the longitudinal (Day 0, Day 28 and Day 42) change in the percentage of participants with both an IgG response and who have antibodies that blocked ACE2 binding to the ancestral, B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variants. Participants were assessed by subdividing into those with or without a previous infection, and whether they received the vaccine or placebo.
Preprints 66600 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated