Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Chronic Use of the Synthetic Cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 55 Modifies the Isoflurane-Sparing Effect of Morphine and Dexmedetomidine

Altmetrics

Downloads

172

Views

93

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

23 January 2023

Posted:

27 January 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The effects of morphine (MOR) and dexmedetomidine (DEX) on the MAC of isoflurane were measured in rats chronically treated with the synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 (WIN55). Methods: The MAC of isoflurane was determined in 32 male rats from expiratory samples at the time of tail clamping. The effects of morphine (MAC(ISO+MOR)) and dexmedetomidine (MAC(ISO+DEX)) on the MAC of isoflurane in untreated rats and rats treated for 21 days with WIN 55,212-2 (MAC(ISO+WIN55+MOR)) and (MAC(ISO+WIN55+DEX)) were measured. Prior to the administration of morphine and dexmedetomidine, the MAC of the isoflurane was measured in both untreated rats (MAC(ISO)) and those treated with WIN 55,212-2 (MAC(ISO+WIN55)). Results: The minimum alveolar concentration was measured as 1.32 ± 0.06 in the MAC(ISO) group and 1.69 ± 0.09 in the MAC(ISO+WIN55) group. The MAC of the MAC(ISO+MOR) group was 0.97 ± 0.02 (26% less than the control group, MAC(ISO)). MAC was measured as 1.55 ± 0.08 in the MAC(ISO+WIN55+MOR) group (8% less than the MAC(ISO+WIN55) group), 0.68 ± 0.10 in the MAC(ISO+DEX) group (48% less than the control group, MAC(ISO)), and 0.67 ± 0.08 in the MAC(ISO+WIN55+DEX) group (60% less than the MAC(ISO+WIN55) group). Conclusions: The administration of WIN 55,212-2 for 21 days increases the MAC of isoflurane in rats. The sparing effect on isoflurane of morphine decreases in rats chronically treated with the synthetic cannabinoid, WIN 55,212-2. Dexmedetomidine increases its sparing effect on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in rats chronically treated with WIN 55,212-2.
Keywords: 
Subject: Medicine and Pharmacology  -   Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

1. Introduction

In the year 2020, 209 million people had used cannabis. Cannabis sativa is the most popular illicit drug in the 21st century, and countries are increasingly legalizing its medicinal and recreational use. According to the World Drug Report 2022, published by the United Nations [1], cannabis remains the most widely used drug in the world. There is a great expectation that cannabis and its derivatives will be used for medicinal purposes in the treatment of chronic pain (particularly cancer) and pediatric seizure disorders, as an appetite stimulant, as treatment for spasticity in multiple sclerosis, for controlling nausea and vomiting in patients with HIV/AIDS, in the treatment neurodegenerative diseases, and, potentially, in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder and addictions to different substances. Multiple investigations are underway on the use of cannabis in the treatment of various human diseases [2,3,4]. It is currently considered that the increased use of cannabinoids, as an alternative, may help in lowering the excessive use of opioids. There is evidence that cannabinoids can help to reduce the opioid dosage necessary for generating analgesia [5], with one related study reporting a 64% decrease in opioid use [6]. Similarly, when cannabinoids and opioids were administered in conjunction, a decrease in pain of 27% was recorded with no changes in the opioid plasma concentration pharmacokinetics [7].
On the other hand, the administration of dexmedetomidine during general-anesthesia procedures decreases the opioid and hypnotic requirements (sparing effect), offers analgesic properties, decreases postoperative nausea, vomiting, and shivering [8], and exerts therapeutic effects with respect to perioperative stress, postoperative delirium, and neuroprotection. However, the reasons for this are still not entirely clear, and elucidation of these thus remains a focus of studies [9,10,11].
Therefore, given the high possibility that a chronic consumer of Cannabis sativa, or its derivatives, requires general anesthesia and dexmedetomidine or an opioid, we consider it important to study whether the isoflurane-sparing effects of morphine and dexmedetomidine, previously reported in the literature, are the same in cannabis users, given the lack of studies on this topic.

2. Materials and Methods

This study and its procedures (protocol number 3492/2013CHT) have been approved by the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the University of the State of Mexico.
Thirty-two rats weighing 310 ± 20 g were used and were housed in Plexiglas cages at an ambient temperature of 23 ± 2 °C. The animals had free access to water and food (Prolab1 RMH 2500, St. Louis, MO, USA).
Animals were handled according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [12].

2.1. Anesthetic Procedure

Anesthesia was induced by placing each rat in the induction chamber and delivering 5% isoflurane (Forane; Baxter Laboratories, Irvine, CA, USA) with an oxygen flow rate of 5 L/min. Once the animal was anesthetized, it was removed from the chamber and dorsally intubated. The oral cavity was opened, and the larynx was located using a laryngoscope. At this point, a flexible wire guide was inserted to direct the endotracheal catheter (16G Teflon catheter: Introcan; B-Braun, Sao Goncalo, Brazil) and was fixed to the maxilla.
The analysis of CO2 corroborated correct placement of the catheter (BeneView T5, Mindray, Multi-Gas Offers, Shenzhen, China), which was connected to a T-piece breathing system with fresh gas flow of oxygen at 1 L/min. The anesthetic concentration was adjusted in light of the hemodynamic changes and palpebral reflexes during instrumentation. During the experiment, rats breathed spontaneously.
The dissection was carried out on the carotid artery for placement of the 24-gauge catheter (Introcan; B-Braun, São Gonçalo, Brazil), which was connected to a pressure transducer for continuous measurement of systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures (SAP, DAP, and MAP, respectively) and heart rate (HR) (BeneView T5, Mindray, Shenzhen, China) as well as for the collection of arterial blood for analysis of blood gases (GEM Premier 3000; Instrumentation Laboratory, Seattle, WA, USA). A total of 0.3 mL of blood was obtained after determining the MAC to guarantee that each rat presented normal physiological parameters at that time. A caudal vein was catheterized for the administration of the drugs of each group. Inspired isoflurane (FiIso), end-tidal (FeIso) concentrations, end-tidal carbon-dioxide tension (PEtCO2), and respiratory rate (RR) were continuously measured through endotracheal gas sampling (60 mL/min) via a catheter placed in the endotracheal tube at the level of the carina connected to an infrared gas analyzer (BeneView T5, Mindray, multi-gas offers, Shenzhen, China)
Through use of a warming system (Equator1, SurgiVet1, Smiths Medical PM Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA), we sought to maintain the rectal temperature between 37 and 38 °C.

2.2. MAC Determination

Prior to initiating MAC isoflurane determination, FeIso was adjusted to 1.3%, which is a value of isoflurane MAC that was previously reported [13]. This was maintained for 15 min to allow equilibrium to be established between alveolar gas, arterial blood, and the spinal cord [14]. Isoflurane MAC was obtained using the tail clamp method [15]. A painful noxious stimulus was applied with a hemostat clamped (8-inch Rochester Dean) on the tail at a specific end-tidal concentration. The tail was clamped to the first ratchet lock for 60 s or until a positive response was observed. The tail was always stimulated proximally to the previous test site. A positive motor response was considered if jerking or twisting motions of the head or body or movement of the extremities were observed. A lack of movement, muscle rigidity, swallowing, and chewing were considered negative responses; movement of the tail was not considered.
If the observed response was positive, the anesthetic concentration was increased by 10%, and if the response was negative, the concentration of the anesthetic was decreased by 10%. After an equilibration period of 15 min, the stimulus was applied again. The evaluation of the MAC was carried out twice on each rat by a person who was unaware of the treatment being administered.
Since the experiment was carried out at a height of 2680 m above sea level with an average pressure of 556 mmHg, the values of MAC of isoflurane were corrected to sea level using the formula (barometric pressure of location/760 mmHg) × obtained MAC value.
At the end of each experiment, animals were euthanized with intravenously delivered pentobarbital (Anestesal, Pfizer, Toluca, Mexico).

2.3. Experimental Design

The animals were randomly distributed into six groups (n = 8) using Excel 2007, Microsoft Office.
For the MAC(ISO+MOR) group, the measurement was performed 45 min after the administration of 3 mg/kg morphine i.v. (Graten, PiSA, Mexico). This is the optimal dose, which had been determined in a previous publication [16]. Prior to the administration of morphine, the MAC of isoflurane was measured (MAC(ISO)).
For the MAC(ISO+DEX)) group, the measurement was performed 30 min after the administration of a continuous intravenous infusion of 0.25 μg/kg/min dexmedetomidine i.v. (Dexdomitor, Zoetis, Mexico). This is the dose determined to be optimal in a previous publication [17]. Prior to the administration of dexmedetomidine, the MAC of isoflurane was measured (MAC(ISO)).
The MAC(ISO+WIN55+MOR) group was intraperitoneally (i.p.) administered 1 mg/kg of WIN 55,212-2 (mesylate salt, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) every 24 h (at 09:00 h) for 21 days, in accordance with Lawston et al. [18]. The measurement was performed 24 h after the last treatment (day 22); 45 min prior to MAC measurement, 3 mg/kg morphine was administered i.v. Prior to the administration of morphine, the MAC of isoflurane was measured (MAC(ISO+WIN55)).
The MAC(ISO+WIN55+DEX) group was intraperitoneally (i.p.) administered 1 mg/kg of WIN 55,212-2 every 24 h (at 09:00 h) for 21 days. The measurement was performed 24 h after the last treatment (day 22), 30 min after continuous intravenous infusion of 0.25 μg/kg/min dexmedetomidine i.v. Prior to the administration of dexmedetomidine, the MAC of isoflurane was measured (MAC(ISO+WIN55)).
WIN 55,212-2 was suspended in a vehicle of 0.3% Tween 80 in saline (0.9%), as described by Tanda et al. [19]. Isoflurane MAC measurements were performed 24 h after the last treatment with WIN 55,212-2 (day 22).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test was used for the assessment of data normality. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Analysis of variance was performed, and post hoc comparison of the groups was performed using the Holm–Sidak test. Values were considered statistically different when p < 0.05.

3. Results

The minimum alveolar concentration was measured as 1.32 ± 0.06 in the MAC(ISO) group and 1.69 ± 0.09 in the MAC(ISO+WIN55) group. These values coincide with those previously reported in [20]. MAC was measured as 0.97 ± 0.02 in the MAC(ISO+MOR) group (26% less than the control group MAC(ISO)), 1.55 ± 0.08 in the MAC(ISO+WIN55+MOR) group (8% less than the MAC(ISO+WIN55) group), 0.68 ± 0.10 in the MAC(ISO+DEX) group (48% less than the control group MAC(ISO)), and 0.67 ± 0.08 in the MAC(ISO+WIN55+DEX) group (60% less than the MAC(ISO+WIN55) group) (See Table 1 and Table 2).

4. Discussion

In this study, we observed that the repeated administration of the synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 55 for 21 days increases the MAC of isoflurane. This result coincides with those previously reported in [20]. According to the obtained results, morphine decreases the MAC of isoflurane by 26%, which coincides with results previously reported in the literature [16]. We also observed that the isoflurane-sparing effect of morphine is weaker in rats chronically treated with the cannabinoid. This can be a consequence of increased noradrenergic activity in the central nervous system due to the chronic administration of cannabinoids [21,22]. It is also interesting to note that there are reports of a cross-tolerance effect between opioid and cannabinoid compounds. The administration of Δ9-THC has been observed to induce tolerance of the analgesic and cardiovascular effects of morphine [23], and it was also reported that the chronic administration of morphine induces tolerance of the analgesic effects of Δ9-THC [24]. The mechanism by which this effect is generated is complex and remains unclear [25]. The decrease in the effect of morphine, observed as the lowering of the MAC of isoflurane in rats chronically treated with WIN 55,212-2, could suggest (in MAC terms) a cross-tolerance effect between cannabinoids and morphine.
Finally, we observed that the decreasing effects of the dexmedetomidine on the isoflurane MAC were maintained even in rats chronically treated with WIN 55,212-2. Dexmedetomidine, a subtype of nonselective α2-adrenoceptor agonist, is sympatholytic; it decreases central sympathetic activity and, significantly, reduces the circulating levels of catecholamines [26], and it decreases the halothane MAC by up to 90% [27]. Therefore, the mechanism by which dexmedetomidine decreases the requirements of inhalational anesthetics implies mechanisms other than the inhibition of noradrenaline in the central nervous system, since it has been demonstrated that the locus coeruleus is not the only site where α2-adrenoceptor agonists have anesthetic effects [28]. It is important to determine how the constant administration of a synthetic cannabinoid favors the effect of dexmedetomidine on the requirements of inhalational anesthetics. Unfortunately, our study did not allow us to determine this mechanism. Therefore, it is important to consider the possibility of modifying the anesthetic requirements of individuals who consume or are treated with cannabinoids. These patients may present different responses to the usual doses of morphine and dexmedetomidine during inhalation anesthesia.

References

  1. UNODC. World Drug Report 2022, United Nations Publication, 2022.
  2. Kumar, P.; Mahato, D.K.; Kamle, M.; Borah, R.; Sharma, B.; Pandhi, S.; Tripathi, V.; Yadav, H.S.; Devi, S.; Patil, U.; et al. Pharmacological properties, therapeutic potential, and legal status of Cannabis sativa L: An overview. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Whiting, P.F.; Wolff, R.F.; Deshpande, S.; Di Nisio, M.; Duffy, S.; Hernandez, A.V.; Keurentjes, J.C.; Lang, S.; Misso, K.; Ryder, S.; et al. Cannabinoids for medical use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2015, 313, 2456–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jugl, S.; Okpeku, A.; Costales, B.; Morris, E.J.; Alipour-Haris, G.; Hincapie-Castillo, J.M.; Stetten, N.E.; Sajdeya, R.; Keshwani, S.; Joseph, V.; et al. A mapping literature review of medical cannabis clinical outcomes and quality of evidence in approved conditions in the USA from 2016 to 2019. Med. Cannabis Cannabinoids 2021, 4, 21–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kinghorn, A.; Falk, H.; Gibbons, S.; Kobayashi, J. Phytocannabinoids; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. Boehnke, K.F.; Litinas, E.; Clauw, D.J. Medical cannabis use is associated with decreased opiate medication use in a retrospective cross-sectional survey of patients with chronic pain. J. Pain 2016, 17, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abrams, D.I.; Couey, P.; Shade, S.B.; Kelly, M.E.; Benowitz, N.L. Cannabinoid-opioid interaction in chronic pain. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 90, 844–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Davy, A.; Fessler, J.; Fischler, M.; Le Guen, M. Dexmedetomidine and general anesthesia: A narrative literature review of its major indications for use in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017, 83, 1294–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tasbihgou, S.R.; Barends, C.R.M.; Absalom, A.R. The role of dexmedetomidine in neurosurgery. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2021, 35, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kun, W.; Mengge, W.; Jian, X.; Changshuai, W.; Baohui, Z.; Guonian, W.; Daqing, M. Effects of dexmedetomidine on perioperative stress, inflammation, and immune function: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Anaesth. 2019, 123, 777–794. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sun, Y.; Jiang, M.; Ji, Y.; Sun, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shen, W. Impact of postoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on incidence of delirium in elderly patients undergoing major elective noncardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2019, 13, 2911–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th ed.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chavez, J.R.; Ibancovichi, J.A.; Sanchez-Aparicio, P.; Acevedo-Arcique, C.M.; Moran-Muñoz, R.; Recillas-Morales, S. Effect of acetaminophen alone and in combination with morphine and tramadol on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in rats. PLoS ONE 2015, 25, e0143710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Antognini, J.F.; Schwartz, K. Exaggerated anesthetic requirements in the preferentially anesthetized brain. Anesthesiology 1993, 79, 1244–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Quasha, A.L.; Eger, E.I.; Tinker, J.H. Determination and applications of MAC. Anesthesiology 1980, 53, 314–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gómez de Segura, I.A.; Criado, A.B.; Santos, M.; Tendillo, F.J. Aspirin synergistically potentiates isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration reduction produced by morphine in the rat. Anesthesiology 1998, 89, 1489–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rioja, E.; Santos, M.; Martinez Taboada, F.; Ibancovichi, J.A.; Tendillo, F.J. Cardiorespiratory and minimum alveolar concentration sparing effects of a continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine in halothane or isoflurane anaesthetized rats. Lab. Anim. 2006, 40, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lawston, J.; Borella, A.; Robinson, J.K.; Whitaker-Azmitia, P.M. Changes in hippocampal morphology following chronic treatment whith the synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2. Brain Res. 2000, 877, 407–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tanda, G.; Pontieri, F.E.; Chiara, G.D. Cannabinoid and heroin activation of mesolimbic dopamine transmission by a common µ1 opioid receptor mechanism. Science 1997, 276, 2048–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chavez-Monteagudo, J.R.; Ibancovichi, J.A.; Sanchez-Aparicio, P.; Recillas-Morales, S.; Osorio-Avalos, J.; De Paz-Campos, M.A. Minimum Alveolar Concentration of Isoflurane in Rats Chronically Treated with the Synthetic Cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2. Animals 2022, 12, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Girardot, M.N.; Holloway, F.A. Intermittent cold water stress analgesia in rats: Cross tolerance to morphine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1984, 20, 631–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ide, S.; Satoyoshi, H.; Minami, M.; Satoh, M. Amelioration of the reduced antinociceptive effect of morphine in the unpredictable chronic mild stress model mice by noradrenalin but not serotonin reuptake 423 inhibitors. Mol. Pain 2015, 11, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hine, B. Morphine and delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol: Two way cross tolerance for antinociceptive and heart rate responses in the rat. Psychopharmacology 1985, 87, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bloom, A.S.; Dewey, W.L. A comparison of some pharmacological actions of morphine and delta9- tetrahydrocannabinol in the mouse. Psychopharmacology 1978, 57, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Corchero, J.; Manzanares, J.; Fuentes, J.A. Cannabinoid/opioid crosstalk in the central nervous system. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 2004, 16, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Janke, E.L.; Samra, S. Dexmedetomidine and neuroprotection. Semin. Anesth. Perioper. Med. Pain 2006, 25, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Segal, I.S.; Vickery, R.G.; Walton, J.K.; Doze, V.A.; Maze, M. Dexmedetomidine diminishes halothane anesthetic requirements in rats through a postsynaptic alpha2—Adrenergic receptor. Anesthesiology 1988, 69, 818–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eger, E.I., II.; Xing, Y.; Laster, M.J.; Sonner, J.M. α-2 Adrenoreceptors probably do not mediate the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics. Anesth. Analg. 2003, 96, 1661–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Chronic use of the synthetic cannabinoid, WIN 55,212-2 55, modifies the isoflurane-sparing effect of morphine and dexmedetomidine.
Table 1. Chronic use of the synthetic cannabinoid, WIN 55,212-2 55, modifies the isoflurane-sparing effect of morphine and dexmedetomidine.
Group MAC% SD % MAC Increase (↑) or Decrease (↓) p-Value 95% CI
MAC(ISO) 1.32 0.06 - 1.27–1.37
MAC(ISO+WIN55) 1.69 * 0.09 ↑ 28% <0.0001 1.61–1.76
MAC(ISO+MOR) 0.97 * 0.02 ↓ 26% <0.0001 0.95–0.99
MAC(ISO+WIN55+MOR) 1.55 + 0.08 ↓ 8% 0.0094 1.47–1.62
MAC(ISO+DEX) 0.68 * 0.10 ↓ 48% <0.0001 0.59–0.77
MAC(ISO+WIN55+DEX) 0.67 + 0.08 ↓ 60% <0.0001 0.60–0.74
* Statistically significant compared with the control group, MAC(ISO) (p < 0.05). + Statistically significant compared with the control group, MAC(ISO+WIN55) (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Cardiorespiratory and temperature values of the different study groups.
Table 2. Cardiorespiratory and temperature values of the different study groups.
Value MAC(ISO) MAC(ISO+WIN55) MAC(ISO+MOR) MAC(ISO+WIN55+MOR) MAC(ISO+DEX) MAC(ISO+WIN55+DEX)
Heart rate (bpm) 401 ± 8 403 ± 7 399 ± 8 401 ± 11 303 ± 16 * 297 ± 21 +
Mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) 93 ± 8 90 ± 9 91 ± 7 92 ± 8 86 ± 7 84 ± 11
Temperature °C 37.7 ± 0.07 37.6 ± 0.12 37.2 ± 0.11 37.4 ± 0.09 37.4 ± 0.10 37.5 ± 0.08
pH 7.3 ± 03 7.3 ± 0.04 7.4 ± 0.02 7.3 ± 0.02 7.3 ± 0.06 7.3 ± 0.09
PaO2 (mmHg) 301 ± 34 295 ± 8 299 ± 12 289 ± 10 291 ± 16 289 ± 13
PaCo2 (mmHg) 37 ± 4 37 ± 1 38 ± 2 38 ± 4 32 ± 2 37 ± 7
* Statistically significant (p < 0.0001) compared with MACISO group. + Statistically significant (p < 0.0001) compared with MACISO+WIN55 group.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated