Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Status and Prospects of High-Entropy Materials for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Altmetrics

Downloads

348

Views

191

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

28 February 2023

Posted:

28 February 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The emergence of various electronic devices and equipment such as electric vehicles and drones requires higher energy density energy storage devices. Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) are considered as the most promising new generation energy storage system owing to high theoretical specific capacity and energy density. However, the severe shuttle behaviors of soluble lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and the slow redox kinetics lead to low sulfur utilization and poor cycling stability, which seriously hinder the commercial application of LSBs. Therefore, various catalytic materials have been employed to solve these troublesome problems. High entropy materials (HEMs), as advanced materials, can provide unique surface and electronic structures that expose plentiful catalytic active sites, which opens new ideas for the regulation of LiPSs redox kinetics. Notwithstanding many instructive reviews in the land of LSBs, while this review aims to offer a complete and shrewd summary of the current progresses in HEMs-based LSBs, including in-depth interpretation of design principles and mechanistic electrocatalysis functions as well as pragmatic perspectives.
Keywords: 
Subject: Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Chemical Engineering

1. Introduction

The widespread use of traditional fossil fuels and various emerging electronic devices and equipment such as electric vehicles and drones, making it urgent to find higher energy density energy storage devices to replace the traditional energy system [1,2,3,4]. Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) have raised a great attention due to the high specific energy of 2600 Wh kg-1, and theoretical specific capacity of 1675 mAh g-1 [5]. In addition, natural reserves of active material sulfur, are inexpensive and environmentally friendly [6]. The above advantages have also attracted extensive attention and research on LSBs by domestic and foreign researchers [7]. However, the insulating property of sulfur, the sluggish redox kinetics of Li2S2/Li2S, the shuttle effect of soluble lithium polysulfides (LiPSs), as well as huge volume change during lithiation/delithiation, are not conducive to achieving high utilization of active S and long cycle lifespan in LSBs [8,9,10,11].
In order to tackle above critical obstacles, researchers have extensively investigated the performance improvement of LSBs mainly from four aspects: sulfur cathode, electrolyte, separator, and Li anode [12,13,14,15]. Figure 1 depicts the reaction mechanism of the interconversion of S8 and LiPSs during the charging and discharging, explaining the reasons for the slow reaction kinetics and the mechanism of catalytic LiPSs conversion. Physical confinement and chemical adsorption strategies are the common strategies to inhibit the diffusion of LiPSs [16]. However, high sulfur loading cannot be achieved due to the limited adsorption sites. Accelerating redox reaction is another effective method to restraint the migration of LiPSs [17]. Recently, catalysis has been proposed for accelerating the conversion of soluble LiPSs to solid products and reducing their accumulation on the electrolyte [18]. Undoubtedly, once sulfur host materials with strong adsorption and fast catalytic conversion of LiPSs are synthesized, the inhibition of shuttle problem and the improvement of redox kinetics of LiPSs can be achieved simultaneously. Therefore, it is imperative to explore new catalytic hosts for achieving high energy density of LSBs.
In view of LiPSs are negatively charged polar substances, as a Lewis base, they can provide Lewis acids with excess electron pairs to form coordination bonds. Metal atoms with abundant polar sites can be strongly bonded to LiPSs through Lewis acid-base interactions, polar-polar interactions, and sulfur-chain catenation, thus anchoring and trapping them to the host surface and reducing the loss of active substances [19,20]. However, single compound catalysts cannot balance the adsorption and desorption of LiPSs, resulting in poor catalytic activity [21]. Therefore, catalysts with multiple anchoring and catalytical active centers are needed to provide proper adsorption capacity for LiPSs and accelerate its conversion. In addition, the research on conventional catalysts has mainly focused on binary/ternary metal nanoalloys. On the one hand, the modulation of electronic structure and the improvement of catalytic performance are constrained [22]. On the other hand, the composition changes during the catalytic process due to the low atomic diffusion potential [23]. Therefore, the current binary/tertiary alloys can no longer meet the requirements of advanced catalysis [24].
Based on this, High entropy materials (HEMs), consisting of a good mixture of five or more major component atoms/molecules, have also attracted a lot of attention as potential candidates for multicomponent catalysts that achieves strong synergistic effects [25]. In this review, we focus on the major development of HEMs as host materials, explaining its design principles, structure and properties, and electrochemical performances. Finally, some future perspectives and directions are pointed out based on literature, which will further significantly progress in LSBs.

2. High-entropy materials

2.1. The concept of high entropy

“Entropy” is a thermodynamic parameter that indicates the degree of disorder in the system. The higher the degree of disorder in the system, the higher the entropy. The concept of "high entropy" came from High entropy alloys (HEAs) originally. Yeh et al.[26] and Cantor et al. [27] proposed the concept of “HEAs” in 2004. HEAs, unlike conventional alloys, are usually composed of five or more elements in equal or nearly equal atomic ratios, with 5-35% of each element [28]. HEAs have attracted great interest in the development and application of electro/thermal catalytic clean energy conversion due to their unique microstructure, excellent thermal stability, and catalytic activity for various reactions.
The entropy of the configuration increases with the number of elements, which is known as the high entropy effect. and it can greatly enhance the stability of the material [29]. As shown in Figure 2, the high entropy effect is manifested in four main ways [30]: (1) Thermodynamic high entropy effect. N-element alloy systems can form up to N+1 phases. However, HEAs tend to form single-phase solid solutions rather than split phases or various intermetallic compounds. (2) The lattice distortion effect of the structure. For HEA, the individual atoms are randomly distributed in the crystal dot matrix, and the radii and chemical bonds of different atoms differ greatly, and the environment around each atom as well as the occupancies are different, which makes the lattice interior have greater lattice distortion and defects than conventional alloys [31]. (3) Hysteresis diffusion effect of kinetics. Precipitates below the tens of nanometer scale are often observed in the interior of HEA, which is not easily found in conventional alloys, indicating that the diffusion and phase transformation rates are very slow in HEA, and they are not susceptible to structural changes such as grain coarsening or recrystallization at high temperatures. (4) The "cocktail" effect on properties. The basic properties of different components and their interactions make the HEMs present more complex properties.
Following HEAs, inspired by breakthroughs in metal clusters, the concept of HEMs design has been extended to high entropy oxides (HEOs), high entropy ceramics (HECs), high entropy polymers (HEPs) and high entropy composites (HECOMPs) [32]. Similar to HEAs, all HEMs are remotely ordered in structure but disordered in composition. High entropy oxides (HEOs), as a new concept, have been introduced to develop advanced materials with unique properties, which are not possible with conventional materials relying on only one or a few major elements. HEOs are multi-component oxides with a single solid solution structure composed of five or more oxides in equal or nearly equal amounts of matter, including transition metal-based HEOs (TM-HEOs), rare-earth-based HEOs (RE-HEOs), and hybrid-based HEOs (TM-RE-HEOs) [33]. HEOs represent multi-element metal systems that can crystallize in a single phase, and different systems can be in different crystal structures, which can also be classified according to structural classification as rock salt, fluorite, chalcocite, spinel, and other oxides [34].
In the past five years, high-entropy ceramic materials have sprung up gradually. Compared with HEAs, the emergence of high-entropy ceramics (HECs) provides more opportunities for the optimization of material properties and overcomes bottlenecks in material applications. HECs have good high-temperature strength, excellent creep resistance, good thermal/environmental stability, and low thermal conductivity [35]. Compared with traditional ceramic materials, HECs exhibit superior corrosion resistance, oxidation resistance, thermal stability, and high hardness, and have great potential for applications in the fields of defense and military, aerospace, and new energy.
HEAs and other HEMs have potential development abilities and broad application prospects, resulted from the unique design strategies and unique properties. As shown in Figure 3, for example, NH3 decomposition reaction [36], Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) [37], Lithium−sulfur Batteries(LSBs), Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) [38], Methane Oxidation Reaction (MOR) [39], Formic Acid Oxidation Reaction (FAOR) [40], CO Oxidation Reaction [41], Methanol Oxidation Reaction [42], electromagnetic wave shielding materials [43], functional coating and antibacterial materials, hydrogen storage materials, anti-radiation materials, thermoelectric materials, etc. which are expected to be widely used in various new fields.

2.2. Preparation of High Entropy Materials

The method of the synthesis of the material plays an important role in its development. Selecting a suitable synthetic route requires consideration of several aspects, such as, phase stability, element distribution, morphology characteristics, desired properties and applications. Several other parameters should be considered in the selection of the synthetic process, such as time, temperature and complexity of the process [44]. Although large bulk and thin films are important for mechanical and coating applications. There is a general trend to synthesize high entropy nanomaterials, including nanoparticles, nanofibers, nanotubes, nanosheets, etc. These nanomaterials exhibit better physical and chemical properties in some specific applications due to their core effects such as small size effect, surface effect, quantum size effect, quantum tunneling effect, and dielectric confinement effect. Nano-HEAs are promising for a wide range of applications in multiphase catalysis [45,46]. Compared with conventional low-entropy nanomaterials, the strain effect induced by their lattice distortion has a promoting catalytic activity effect, which can lead to more stable crystal structures on thermodynamically (ΔGmix = ΔHmix -TΔSmix) and kinetically (vacancy mechanism for diffusion). Therefore, the design of HEA nanomaterials with specific structures provides a new research direction for the construction of efficient and stable electrocatalytic materials.
The preparation of HEMs with special morphology and controllable structure accounts for an ultimate pursuit for practical implementation. For LSBs, the synthesis of HEMs plays an important impact on their both ability of LiPSs confinement and superior catalytic activity. Therefore, it is worth concluding the current preparation routes for targeted HEMs. The typical methods for HEMs synthesis are discussed in the following:
Preprints 69234 g004
Figure 4. Common synthesis methods for high entropy materials: Wet-chemistry synthesis, Sputtering deposition [47], and Carbothermal shock [48], Ball-milling [49], Microwave-assisted synthesis [50], Electrospinning technology [51], and Pulse discharge method [52], Spray pyrolysis [53].
Figure 4. Common synthesis methods for high entropy materials: Wet-chemistry synthesis, Sputtering deposition [47], and Carbothermal shock [48], Ball-milling [49], Microwave-assisted synthesis [50], Electrospinning technology [51], and Pulse discharge method [52], Spray pyrolysis [53].
Preprints 69234 g004

Wet-chemistry synthesis

Currently, traditional wet chemical synthesis methods including hydrothermal and solvothermal methods are based on the crystallization process of substances [54]. Both methods need to be carried out in a reactor. In the hydrothermal method, the reactants are dissolved in water, while it should be dissolved in an organic solvent in the solvothermal method. The morphology and particle size of the product can be influenced by temperature, pH and reactant concentration. This is an inexpensive way to prepare high-purity, high-quality nanoparticles at low temperatures. For HEMs, the application of this method does not have the problems of complex reaction equipment, complicated preparation process, high reaction temperature and large particle size compared to other methods [55,56].
Jiang et al. [57] synthesized a high-entropy metal hydroxymethoxy-based material FeCoNiMgCr(OH)(OCH3) (denoted as FeCoNiMgCr-HM) using a one-step solvothermal method to investigate the application of HEM for electrochemical water splitting. As shown in Figure 5a, the electrochemically activated FeCoNiMgCr-HM exhibited excellent catalytic properties due to the synergistic effect of the five metal cations and methoxy-induced surface reconstruction. Wu et al. [58] first synthesized six Platinum-Group-Metal HEA nanoparticles (PGM-HEA) using simple wet chemistry. The HEA NPs will be promising catalysts for complex reactions due to their various active sites and high stability. The various elements are uniformly distributed as seen in the corresponding EDS plots (Figure 5b).
Broge and co-workers [59] used the solvothermal method to synthesize PtIrPdRhRu HEAs. Homogeneous materials were obtained within a relatively narrow temperature window of about 200 °C, which is well below the reduction temperature of some metals in the solvothermal reaction of a single precursor (Figure 5c).
Preprints 69234 g005
Figure 5. (a) Synthesis of high-entropy hydroxy-methoxy compounds with layered structures by one-step solvothermal method and TEM images [57]. (b) HAADF-STEM image of the as-prepared PGMHEA and the corresponding EDX maps [58]. (c) Schematic diagram of formation mechanism of PtIrPdRhRu HEA nanoparticles under solvothermal conditions [59].
Figure 5. (a) Synthesis of high-entropy hydroxy-methoxy compounds with layered structures by one-step solvothermal method and TEM images [57]. (b) HAADF-STEM image of the as-prepared PGMHEA and the corresponding EDX maps [58]. (c) Schematic diagram of formation mechanism of PtIrPdRhRu HEA nanoparticles under solvothermal conditions [59].
Preprints 69234 g005

Mechanical Ball-milling

The solid-state reaction method is a traditional method for the preparation of HEM, which is based on controlling the interdiffusion of the initial precursor powders to produce HEM [60,61]. The most commonly used solid-phase reaction method is mechanical alloying, also known as mechanical ball-milling, which is commonly used to prepare metal powders. Metal powders are deformed, cold-welded and broken in a ball mill to finally make elements to achieve atomic-level alloying. This complex and tedious physical process is mechanical alloying. The principle is shown in Figure 6a, where the sample is placed in a bowl together with the grinding balls and then violently rotated or vibrated. The collision of the ball with the bowl and the powder leads to a solid-state reaction [62]. The main advantage of mechanized alloying is that a more uniform nanoscale tissue distribution can be obtained.
M.Y. Rekha et al. reported a synthesis of multi-component NiFeCrCoCu HEA nanoparticle-graphene composites using mechanical ball milling and ultrasound-assisted exfoliation methods [63]. As shown in Figure 6b, the five transition metals are uniformly distributed. Jin et al. [64] prepared a new class of high-entropy metal nitrides (HEMNs) by a two-step mechanochemical synthesis. As shown in Figure 6c, the five transition metal chlorides were mixed with urea in a ball milling process to produce highly dispersed precursors, which were subsequently pyrolyzed under N2 conditions. The use of five metal elements significantly increased the conformational entropy. In addition, Hari Prasad et al. [65] prepared FeNiCoCrAlMn HEA containing dispersed alumina using mechanized synthesis. The results show that the dispersion of alumina had no effect on the organization of the alloy. Both alloys have FCC and BCC biphasic structures and contain a small amount of Mn3Co7 phase.

Sputtering deposition

Sputtering includes reactive radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering, direct current (DC) sputtering and multi-metal co-sputtering, which can be used to prepare hard, corrosion-resistant, high-entropy nitride, carbide and oxide films. Sputtering deposition is a widely used technique for depositing nanoparticles or thin films on substrate materials [66]. As shown in Figure 7a, the principle of the technique is to change the metallic surface state of the target, using the interaction of equal ions in the gas under the action of electric and alternating magnetic fields. The accelerated high-energy particles bombard the target surface, and after energy exchange, the atoms on the target surface escape from the original lattice and transfer to the substrate surface and form a film [67]. Since the high capacity of deposition atomic, the formed film has a uniform and dense organization and a high bond with the substrate. In addition, the composition control is easily ensured in the preparation of alloy films. However, the sputtering deposition speed is not quick, and the presence of radiation and bombardment of the plasma on the substrate, which can not only cause substrate heating but also may form internal defects.
Talluri et al. [68] performed thin film deposition using eutectic HEA (AlCoCrFeNi2.1) as a target material by radio frequency magnetron sputtering technique. The cross-sectional field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images of the generated films are shown in Figure 7b. The results show that the thickness of the film is about 95 nm, which is already in the range of nanocrystals. He et al. [69] used magnetron sputtering method to prepare high hardness TiVZrCrAl HEA coatings and investigated their organization, mechanical and corrosion properties. As shown in Figure 7c, Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) maps at 300 °C show one stronger diffraction ring and three weaker diffraction rings. The wider and weaker diffraction rings indicate that the coating is less crystalline and close to an amorphous structure, which is consistent with the XRD analysis.
Tobias et al. [70] synthesized a CrMnFeCoNi nanoparticles using magnetron sputtering, exhibiting a high entropic effect promoting the formation of a single solid solution. As shown in Figure 7d, they bombarded the elemental target with Ar plasma and sputtered the metal atoms in the target into the ionic liquid instead of the matrix. These metal atoms are subsequently nucleated and grown in the ionic liquid to generate the corresponding HEA NPs. The specific synthesis method based on combined co-sputtering from the elemental target to the ionic liquid achieves a precise tuning of the elemental composition of the multi-components alloy NPs. It was found that the material is comparable to Pt in terms of ORR activity. In addition, the size of NPs can be adjusted by choosing a suitable ionic liquid as a stabilizer and suspension medium [71].

Carbothermal shock method

Carbonthermal shock (CTS) provides a new way to synthesize high-entropy nanoparticles with narrow particle size distribution and uniform dispersion. CTS is a novel ultrafast, high-temperature process (>2000 K) for the production of uniform, monodisperse HEA-NPs on conductive materials [72]. The high temperature causes rapid thermal decomposition of the metal salt precursors to form small droplets of multi-metallic solutions. Subsequently, these droplets rapidly cool and crystallize into homogeneous alloy nanoparticles independent of agglomeration, elemental segregation or phase segregation. However, the size of the substrate conductive material is limited to a large extent, which restricts the mass production [73]. This CTS method opens up a wide scope for the synthesis of alloys and nanocrystals.
The basic principles of the CTS method have been described by Hu et al. [74] and Lu et al [75] (Figure 8a, b). The high temperature, combined with the catalytic activity of the liquid metal, drives the rapid "fission" and "fusion" events of the particles, resulting in a homogeneous mixing of multiple elements [76]. The cooling rate can be adjusted by changing the input parameters, which greatly affects the structure of the formed nanoparticles. Compared with the conventional method, CTS could be a feasible way to form highly dispersed nanoparticles, and can easily obtain nanostructured catalysts with polymetallic compositions. It exhibits higher structural and chemical stability compared to conventionally synthesized nanocatalysts.
Xie et al. [48] synthesized CoMoFeNiCu HEA NPs by rapid heating and cooling of metal precursors on oxygenated carbon carriers by the carbothermal shock method. Moreover, the mixed-phase limitation of the bimetallic CoMo alloy was broken by adjusting the ratio of Co/Mo elements in the HEA NPs. The obtained knowledge was combined with the reaction kinetics and simulated atomic structures of HEA catalysts to further explore the catalytic enhancement mechanism of HEA catalysts for efficient decomposition of ammonia. Recently, Deng [77] used nickel foil as a carrier for fast Joule-heating for the ultrafast synthesis of high entropy oxides. The method exhibits extremely short synthesis time and wide generalizability in the synthesis of HEOs.

Electrospinning technology

Electrospinning is a simple and scalable method for preparing nanofibers with controlled morphology and composition, which has played a vital role in the field of constructing one-dimensional nanostructured materials with the potential to synthesize fiber-like HEM [78]. The schematic diagram of electrospinning is presented in Figure 9a, where a precursor solution containing five metal salts is added to the needle of an electrospinning machine, and the droplets at the tip of the needle change from a sphere to a cone (i.e. a “Taylor cone”) under the action of an electric field, and the fiber filaments are obtained by extending from the tip of the "Taylor cone". On the other side, a rotating roller receives it evenly.
To demonstrate the feasibility of low-temperature synthesis of high-entropy ceramic nanofibers (HECNFs) by electrospinning, Xing [78] synthesized the high-entropy (Y0.2Yb0.2Sm0.2Eu0.2Er)O0.223 nanofibers by a new electrospinning method and low-temperature solid-solution treatment. Li [79] proposed a method for the facile preparation of high entropy ceramic nanofibers (La0.2 Nd0.2Sm0.2Dy0.2Yb)0.22ZrO27(HE-RE2ZrO27) by electrospinning and annealing process, and systematically investigated its microstructure and thermal stability. Figure 9b shows the typical nanofibers and their compositional energy spectra of HE-RE2ZrO27 nanofibers when sintered without insulation at 1000°C. It can be seen that HE-RE2ZrO27 nanofibers are internally composed of fine nanoparticles and various rare-earth elements are uniformly distributed in the fibers, and this structure makes them promising for applications in the field of thermal insulation. Zhu et al. [80] in situ synthesized FeCoNiIrRu HEA nanocrystals in carbon nanofibers (CNFs) using a combination of electrospinning and graphitization, and investigated the chemical composition and electronic states of FeCoNiIrRu/CNFs by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Figure 9c).

Spray pyrolysis

The spray pyrolysis method, in which liquid droplet aerosols produced by solution atomization is carried by a carrier gas into a high-temperature reaction furnace. When the water evaporates, the droplets precipitate out of the solid phase due to supersaturation and are transformed into hybridized spherical particles composed of various metal salt elements. Alternatively, the solution is sprayed into a high-temperature atmosphere and dried, followed by a heat treatment to form a powder. The size of the particles formed is highly dependent on the spraying process parameters. The spray method requires high temperature and vacuum conditions, and has high requirements for equipment and operation, but it is easy to produce powders with small particle size and good dispersion.
Here, Qiao et al. [81] reported the synthesis of high-entropy phosphate(HEPi) catalysts (CoFeNiMnMoPi) in the form of highly homogeneous spherical particles. As shown in Figure 10a. The metal salt precursors were dissolved in ethanol solution and tri-n-octylphosphine oxide (TOPO) was added. Aerosol droplets are formed under spray, and the oxide is converted to phosphate phase in situ during high temperature and rapid heating. Jennifer et al. [82] analyzed the formation mechanism of HEA nanocrystalline-based macro- and mesoporous materials and the role of templating agents by using different templating agents to synthesize HEA by spray pyrolysis. The level of chemical and structural complexity achievable by spray pyrolysis was significantly improved by fabricating HEAs-based particles with controlled porosity.

Microwave-assisted synthesis

Conventional methods for synthesizing HEMs require high temperatures of ~1000°C. The relatively slow ramp-up rate greatly limits the preparation of HEMs on a large scale. Microwave heating is an effective method for inducing thermal energy and has been used for synthesis of organic [84] and high-quality carbon materials [85], as well as carbon-loaded nanomaterials [86,87]. This microwave heating method has several advantages: (1) fast heating and cooling rates, (2) high achievable temperatures, and (3) applicability to carbon materials of various sizes. In view of these advantages, this microwave radiation-induced heating method has a great potential to be applied in a wide range of production applications of nanomaterials.
Hu et al. [88] reported a facile, efficient and scalable microwave heating method for the synthesis of HEA-NPs on carbon based substrates of different sizes (Figure 11a). They synthesized PtPdFeCoNi HEA-NPs with an average particle size of about 12 nm. Otherwise, there has uniform element mixing owing to almost simultaneous decomposition and liquid metal solidification without diffusion and phase segregation. In addition to two-dimensional carbon materials such as graphene oxide, this microwave synthesis method can also be applied to other carbon-based materials, including one-dimensional materials (e.g., CNFs) and three-dimensional materials (e.g., c-wood), which also has a dimensional effect on the particle size of the generated HEA-NPs.
Colombo et al. [89] proposed a novel and simple method for the synthesis of HEO materials through microwave radiation. It is worth noting that the five elements are evenly distributed (Figure 11b). Mehdi [90] synthesized HEO (Mg, Cu, Ni, Co, Zn)O nanoparticles through microwave irradiation. As Figure 11c, the preparation process and principles of the material are clearly demonstrated. This method greatly reduces the time and cost of synthesizing HEMs. Microwave-assisted synthesis is also safer than flame pyrolysis [47] and with higher product reproducibility [90].

Pulse discharge method

Due to the transient high current density, pulsed electrolysis can increase the cathodic overpotential at the same current density (compared to direct current (DC). Lu et al. [91] developed a pulsed current electrodeposition method to grow a FeCoNiMnW HEA(H-FeCoNiMnW) on the surface of carbon paper. As shown in Figure 12a-c, the morphological characterization shows that the material is spherical and has a uniform distribution of various elements, which can be used as an efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalyst for HER and OER in acidic media.

3. Application in Lithium-sulfur batteries

At present, the development of LSBs urgently needs to be driven by advanced catalytic materials. The surface of HEA is highly heterogeneous, due to the mixture of multiple metals, which provides diverse sites for LiPSs to be adsorbed and reacted. Activation of multisite HEA electrocatalysts helps to improve the atomic utilization of each metal in polysulfide adsorption [92]. In addition, HEA nanocrystals exhibit highly exposed active surfaces and excellent dynamic structural stability [93]. Multipoint HEA nanocrystal electrocatalysts have become a rising star in recent years due to their flexible elemental composition and customizable electronic structure, providing opportunities for efficient synergistic catalytic polysulfide conversion. This work compares the electrochemical performance of several HEMs applied to LSBs in terms of both rate performance (Figure 13a).
The reaction process in LSBs involves a series of multi-electron and multi-phase transitions [95]. S8 active cathode involves a 16-electron transfer reaction (S8 + 16 Li++ 16e- ⇋ 8 Li2S), enabling LSBs to achieve a high theoretical capacity of 1675 mAh g-1. In general, LSBs exhibit two discharge voltage plateaus in the capacity-voltage diagram (Figure 13b). During the discharge process, S8 will first be reduced to a series of intermediate products of long-chain LiPSs (Li2Sx, 4 ≤ x ≤ 8), forming the first upper voltage plateau (~2.3 V). In a continuous lithiation process, soluble long-chain LiPSs are converted to solid-phase short-chain LiPSs species Li2S2. Then, Li2S2 is converted to Li2S, providing the second discharge voltage plateau at ~2.1 V. The opposite reactions occur during the charging process. Typically, three types of polarization occur within the cell, activation polarization, concentration polarization, and ohmic polarization. The activation polarization and the concentration polarization can be reduced by changing the composition and structure of the electrode or electrolyte, while ohmic polarization is usually considered as an inherent property. As shown in Figure 13c, to reduce polarization and energy loss, catalysts such as HEA can be used to increase the activity of LiPSs around the anode (reducing the concentration polarization) and to accelerate the subsequent redox reaction (reducing the activation polarization) [28].
Xu et al. [28] investigated a nano-HEA composed of five elements, Fe, Co, Ni, Mn, and Zn, as a catalyst for the redox process of LiPSs. As shown in Figure 14a, the Metal Organic Framework-74(MOF -74) precursor was subjected to rapid CTS reduction to obtain single-phase HEA-NPs, about 7 nm, uniformly distributed on the porous carbon matrix. The test results showed that the capacity retention of LSBs assembled with nano-HEA modified separator was 83.3% (500 cycles at 2 C rate). Due to the strong affinity of nano-HEA with LiPSs, the activity of adsorbed LiPSs around the electrodes was more than 17 times higher than that of the control sample (without the addition of nano-HEA), which significantly reduced the concentration polarization (Figure 14b).
Wang et al. [96] synthesized the introduction of Fe0.24Co0.26Ni0.10Cu0.15Mn0.25 HEA as core catalytic hosts to activate the electrochemical performance of S cathode in LSBs. To further exploit the advantages of HEA in catalysis, Fe0.24Co0.26Ni0.10Cu0.15Mn0.25 high entropy nanocrystals distributed on nitrogen-doped carbon (NC) with good electrical conductivity and affinity for LiPSs were prepared (Figure 14c). As expected, the prepared S/HEA-NC cathode was used to assemble LSBs with excellent rate performance.
Zheng et al. [97] prepared a typical cubic rock salt HEO containing Ni, Mg, Cu, Zu, and Co elements for LSBs application by mechanical ball milling method combined with 1000 °C heat treatment(Figure 15a). The high dispersion of metal species in HEMO-1 favors the exposure of active sites, which undoubtedly facilitates the limitation of LiPSs during charge and discharge. Both platforms of HEMO-1 cells are prolonged compared to KB/S cells, indicating the promotion of LiPSs conversion. The irregular shape of the prepared HEO volume and the low surface activity may not be conducive to load sulfur efficiently. In view of these issues, the future development of HEO materials with regular nanostructures is necessary.
HEO nanofibers (Mg0.2Mn0.2Co0.2Ni0.2Zn0.2)Fe2O4 were prepared by electrospinning method using a mixture of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and metal salts by Tian et al [98]. They applied the HEO nanofibers as catalytic hosts for sulfur in LSBs to promote the conversion of soluble LiPSs. The porous one-dimensional nanostructures synergistically interacted with multiple metal cations in a single spinel structure, which not only provided an ideal pathway to promote Li+ diffusion, but also provided abundant active sites for chemically anchored LiPSs and catalytic LiPSs conversion. The results show that the S/HEO composites can achieve fast kinetics and good cycling stability (Figure 15b).
Colombo et al. [89] designed and synthesized HEO materials ((CoCuMgNiZn)O) by microwave radiation (Figure 15c). Overall, the electrochemical stability of the material and the uniformity and consistency of the composition during charge and discharge ensure efficient and stable operation of the LSBs with a coulombic efficiency of 98.7% over 500 cycles of 0.2 C. Therefore, these low-cost and simple HEO/S cathode preparation techniques can build better and cheaper LSBs, and open up new avenues for the application of HEMs in energy conversion and storage devices.

4. Conclusion and perspectives

LSBs are currently only in the basic research stage and have not been commercialized, which is mainly affected by the insulation of sulfur/lithium sulfide (S/Li2S), the fatal shuttle effect of LiPSs, as well as volume expansion effect [99]. The tunable atomic species of HEMs and the highly heterogeneous of atomic surfaces, which provides diverse active sites to adsorb and react LiPSs. The use of HEMs electrocatalysts is deemed to be an effective key to inhibiting the shuttle effect and accelerating sulfur reaction kinetics. The well-defined design principle and extensive catalytic mechanism explorations with respect to HEMs have provided valuable guidelines to the construction of high-efficiency and long-lifespan LSBs. Nevertheless, there are still many spaces for persistent explorations in HEMs promoters.
(a) The HEMs with high electrocatalytic activity need to be further evolved. A large number of research results have been achieved in the preparation process and tissue properties of HEMs with different compositions, while the compositions of HEMs are complex and variable. The structure-properties relationship of HEMs is still not perfect. Conventional preparation methods require harsh conditions and high temperatures to overcome the reaction energy barrier, making it hard to precisely control the structure of catalytic materials; or produce nanomaterials with large sizes unsuitable for catalysis. Currently, finding a low-temperature method to precisely prepare high entropy nanomaterials with controllable structure and composition is a difficult problem in the field of HEMs. A breakthrough in the difficulty of the preparation method of HEMs will contribute to carry out the next step of catalytic performance research. It is expected that HEMs will shine in the electrochemical energy storage represented by LSBs.
(b) The electrocatalytic mechanism of HEMs needs to be deeply revealed. A clear electrocatalytic mechanism understanding is beneficial to constructing HEMs with high electrocatalytic activity. The synergistic interaction (e.g. metallic bond, d-p orbital hybridization, electron spin states, Jahn-Teller effect) largely influences the surface state and the distribution of active sites in HEMs. In addition, metal-sulfur bonding also seriously affects the adsorption of HEMs with polysulfides. It is significant to find out the different bonding mechanisms, which helps to understand the catalytic mechanism of HEMs applied to LSBs, and to design specific HEMs.
(c) Advanced in-situ characterization techniques need to be extensively developed [100].
The shuttle problem is one of the most important reactions in LSBs. However, the essential catalysts to overcome its sluggish reaction kinetic always undergo a complex dynamic evolution in the actual catalytic process, and the concomitant intermediates and catalytic products also occur continuous conversion and reconstruction. This makes them difficult to be accurately captured, making the elucidation of catalytic mechanisms difficult. Thus, it is necessary to use extensive in-situ characterization techniques such as XRD, X-ray absorption (XAS) and Raman spectroscopies to proceed the real-time reaction process during charging and discharging of LSBs.
In total, the use of HEMs promoters indeed serves as an effective strategy to optimize the electrochemical reaction approach and design high-energy density and long-lifespan LSBs. However, a multitude of challenges with regard to advanced Li–S system construction is still expected to be addressed throughout persistent efforts from both experimental and theoretical explorations. The real application of LSBs is expected to be further promoted by active HEMs electrocatalysts. The actual application atmospheres, pertaining to high sulfur loading, lean electrolyte usage and flexibility, cause relatively intricate sulfur reaction process, leading to inferior electrochemical performances of LSBs. High-performance LSBs systems toward future commercial application might be realized by applying active HEMs electrocatalysts.

Author Contributions

Yikun Yao: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Jiajun Chen: Writing - review & editing, Drawing of figures. Rong Niu: Writing - review & editing, Drawing of figures. Zhenxin Zhao: Validation, Methodology, Review, Formal analysis. Xiaomin Wang: Resources, Conceptualization, Validation, Writing - review & editing, Visualization.

Funding

The authors appreciate the support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52072256), Key R & D program of Shanxi Province (202102030201006), ShanXi Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 20201101016 and 20181102019).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. Li, H.; Di, S.; Niu, P.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Li, L. A durable half-metallic diatomic catalyst for efficient oxygen reduction. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 1601–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, C.; Xu, D.; Weng, J.; Zhou, S.; Li, W.; Wan, Y.; Jiang, S.; Zhou, D.; Wang, J.; Huang, Q. Phase Change Materials Application in Battery Thermal Management System: A Review. Materials 2020, 13, 4622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xu, D.; Huang, G.; Guo, L.; Chen, Y.; Ding, C.; Liu, C. Enhancement of catalytic combustion and thermolysis for treating polyethylene plastic waste. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022, 5, 113–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Qin, J.; Liu, C.; Huang, Q. Simulation on fire emergency evacuation in special subway station based on Pathfinder. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2020, 21, 100677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yao, X.; Guo, C.; Song, C.; Lu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Ding, H.-M.; Chen, Y.; Li, S.-L.; Lan, Y.-Q. In Situ Interweaved High Sulfur Loading Li–S Cathode by Catalytically Active Metalloporphyrin Based Organic Polymer Binders. Adv. Mater. 2022, 35, 2208846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, Z.; Yi, Z.; Li, H.; Pathak, R.; Cheng, X.; Zhou, J.; Wang, X.; Qiao, Q. Understanding the modulation effect and surface chemistry in a heteroatom incorporated graphene-like matrix toward high-rate lithium-sulfur batteries. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 14777–14784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, Y.; Wang, T.; Tian, H.; Su, D.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, G. Advances in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: From Academic Research to Commercial Viability. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2003666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, J.; Yu, M.; Zhu, J.; Li, W.; Gong, W.; Qiu, H. Enhanced anchoring and catalytic conversion of polysulfides by iron phthalocyanine for graphene-based Li–S batteries. Ionics 2021, 27, 3007–3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Shang, C. The construction of quasi-solid state electrolyte with introduction of Li6. 4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12 to suppress lithium polysulfides’ shuttle effect in Li-S batteries. Mater. Lett. 2023, 336, 133874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Di, S.; Chen, S.; Chang, C.; Wang, S.; Choi, J.; Li, L. Enhancement of polysulfide trapping induced by faceted ferroelectric for high-performance Li-S batteries. Scr. Mater. 2023, 226, 115218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, Z.; Pathak, R.; Wang, X.; Yang, Z.; Li, H.; Qiao, Q. Sulfiphilic FeP/rGO as a highly efficient sulfur host for propelling redox kinetics toward stable lithium-sulfur battery. Electrochimica Acta. 2020, 364, 137117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xie, F.; Xu, C.; Song, Y.; Liang, Q.; Ji, J.; Wang, S. 2D-2D heterostructure of ionic liquid-exfoliated MoS2/MXene as lithium polysulfide barrier for Li-S batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 636, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, C.; Huang, Q.; Zheng, K.; Qin, J.; Zhou, D.; Wang, J. Impact of Lithium Salts on the Combustion Characteristics of Electrolyte under Diverse Pressures. Energies 2020, 13, 5373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yao, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Ren, R.; Wang, X. Tailoring nickel–cobalt bimetallic alloy as highly effective catalyst in modified separators for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 945, 169242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Deng, N.; Peng, Z.; Tian, X.; Li, Y.; Yan, J.; Liu, Y.; Kang, W. Yttrium trifluoride doped polyacrylonitrile based carbon nanofibers as separator coating layer for high performance lithium-metal batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 634, 949–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Shan, J.; Yue, L.; Wang, W.; Li, Y. Conductive few-layered 1T-MoSe2/MXene as a highly-efficient catalyst for accelerating bidirectional sulfur redox kinetics in Li-S batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 936, 168250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, Z.; Duan, Y.; Chen, F.; Tian, Z.; Pathak, R.; Elam, J.W.; Yi, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. Multifunctional transitional metal-based phosphide nanoparticles towards improved polysulfide confinement and redox kinetics for highly stable lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 138310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hua, W.; Xia, J.; Hu, Z.; Li, H.; Lv, W.; Yang, Q.-H. Bimetallic Compound Catalysts with Multiple Active Centers for Accelerated Polysulfide Conversion in Li-S Batteries. J. Electrochem. 2022, 0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, Y.; Lin, L.; Zhang, C.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Qiao, Z.; Lin, J.; Wei, Q.; Wang, L.; Xie, Q.; et al. Recent Advances and Strategies toward Polysulfides Shuttle Inhibition for High-Performance Li-S Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, e2106004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xiao, R.; Luo, D.; Wang, J.; Lu, H.; Ma, H.; Akinoglu, E.; Jin, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z. Oxidation States Regulation of Cobalt Active Sites through Crystal Surface Engineering for Enhanced Polysulfide Conversion in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2202352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ren, R.; Zhao, Z.; Meng, Z.; Wang, X. Hollow heterostructure design enables self-cleaning surface for enhanced polysulfides conversion in advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 608, 1576–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wu, Z.-P.; Caracciolo, D.; Maswadeh, Y.; Wen, J.; Kong, Z.; Shan, S.; Vargas, J.; Yan, S.; Hopkins, E.; Park, K.; et al. Alloying–realloying enabled high durability for Pt–Pd-3d-transition metal nanoparticle fuel cell catalysts. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, T.; Yao, Y.; Huang, Z.; Xie, P.; Liu, Z.; Yang, M.; Gao, J.; Zeng, K.; Brozena, A.; Pastel, G.; et al. Denary oxide nanoparticles as highly stable catalysts for methane combustion. Nat. Catal. 2021, 4, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Guo, W.; Li, D.; Qin, W.; Wu, H.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, L. 3D Anisotropic Au@Pt–Pd Hemispherical Nanostructures as Efficient Electrocatalysts for Methanol, Ethanol, and Formic Acid Oxidation Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2100713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Koo, W.-T.; Millstone, J.; Weiss, P.; Kim, I.-D. The Design and Science of Polyelemental Nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2020, 14, 6407–6413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yeh, J.-W.; Chen, S.-K.; Lin, S.-J.; Gan, J.-Y.; Chin, T.-S.; Shun, T.-T.; Tsau, C.-H.; Chang, S.-Y. Nanostructured High-Entropy Alloys with Multiple Principal Elements: Novel Alloy Design Concepts and Outcomes. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2004, 6, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cantor, B.; Chang, I.; Knight, P.; Vincent, A. Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2004, 375–377, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, H.; Hu, R.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, H.; Zhu, Q.; Shang, J.; Yang, S.; Li, B. Nano high-entropy alloy with strong affinity driving fast polysulfide conversion towards stable lithium sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 43, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tsai, M.-H.; Yeh, J.-W. High-Entropy Alloys: A Critical Review. Mater. Res. Lett. 2014, 2, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xin, Y.; Li, S.; Qian, Y.; Zhu, W.; Yuan, H.; Jiang, P.; Guo, R.; Wang, L. High-Entropy Alloys as a Platform for Catalysis: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 11280–11306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, B.; Wang, C.; Yu, X.; Cao, Y.; Gao, L.; Wu, C.; Yao, Y.; Lin, Z.; Zou, Z. General synthesis of high-entropy alloy and ceramic nanoparticles in nanoseconds. Nat. Synth. 2022, 1, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lei, Z.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Wu, Y.; Jiang, S.; Lu, Z. Development of advanced materials via entropy engineering. Scr. Mater. 2019, 165, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Liu, N.; Zheng, L.; Shi, W.; Wang, X. Polyoxometalate Cluster-Incorporated High Entropy Oxide Sub-1 nm Nanowires. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 23191–23197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oses, C.; Toher, C.; Curtarolo, S. High-entropy ceramics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xiang, H.; Xing, Y.; Dai, F.; Wang, H.; Su, L.; Miao, L.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Y.; Qi, X.; Yao, L.; et al. High-entropy ceramics: Present status, challenges, and a look forward. J. Adv. Ceram. 2021, 10, 385–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yao, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xie, P.; Huang, Z.; Li, T.; Morris, D.; Finfrock, Z.; Zhou, J.; Jiao, M.; Gao, J.; et al. Computationally aided, entropy-driven synthesis of highly efficient and durable multi-elemental alloy catalysts. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaz0510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Okejiri, F.; Yang, S.; Zhou, S.; Dai, S. Entropy-Maximized Synthesis of Multimetallic Nanoparticle Catalysts via a Ultrasonication-Assisted Wet Chemistry Method under Ambient Conditions. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2019, 6, 1900015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nandan, R.; Raj, G.; Nanda, K. FeCoNiMnCr High-Entropy Alloy Nanoparticle-Grafted NCNTs with Promising Performance in the Ohmic Polarization Region of Fuel Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022, 14, 16108–16116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, P.; Cao, Q.; Yi, W.; Hao, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, B.; Huang, L.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, B.; et al. Facile and General Method to Synthesize Pt-Based High-Entropy-Alloy Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 14017–14028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhan, C.; Bu, L.; Sun, H.; Huang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, T.; Ma, H.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Geng, H.; et al. Medium/High-Entropy Amalgamated Core/Shell Nanoplate Achieves Efficient Formic Acid Catalysis for Direct Formic Acid Fuel Cell. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed Engl. 2023, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qiu, H.-J.; Fang, G.; Wen, Y.; Liu, P.; Xie, G.; Liu, X.; Sun, S. Nanoporous high-entropy alloys for highly stable and efficient catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019, 7, 6499–6506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yusenko, K.; Riva, S.; Carvalho, P.; Yusenko, M.; Arnaboldi, S.; Sukhikh, A.; Hanfland, M.; Gromilov, S. First hexagonal close packed high-entropy alloy with outstanding stability under extreme conditions and electrocatalytic activity for methanol oxidation. Scr. Mater. 2017, 138, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, X.; Duan, Y.; Guo, Y.; Pang, H.; Li, Z.; Sun, X.; Wang, T. Microstructure Design of High-Entropy Alloys Through a Multistage Mechanical Alloying Strategy for Temperature-Stable Megahertz Electromagnetic Absorption. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Akrami, S.; Edalati, P.; Fuji, M.; Edalati, K. High-entropy ceramics: Review of principles, production and applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2021, 146, 100644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pedersen, J.; Batchelor, T.; Bagger, A.; Rossmeisl, J. High-Entropy Alloys as Catalysts for the CO2 and CO Reduction Reactions. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 2169–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Batchelor, T.; Pedersen, J.; Winther, S.; Castelli, I.; Jacobsen, K.; Rossmeisl, J. High-Entropy Alloys as a Discovery Platform for Electrocatalysis. Joule 2019, 3, 834–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nagy, P.; Rohbeck, N.; Roussely, G.; Sortais, P.; Lábár, J.; Gubicza, J.; Michler, J.; Pethö, L. Processing and characterization of a multibeam sputtered nanocrystalline CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloy film. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2020, 386, 125465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xie, P.; Yao, Y.; Huang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, T.; Wang, G.; Shahbazian-Yassar, R.; Hu, L.; Wang, C. Highly efficient decomposition of ammonia using high-entropy alloy catalysts. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, K.; Liu, Z.; Yu, H.; Zhong, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z. Improved efficiency for preparing hard magnetic Sm2Fe17NX powders by plasma assisted ball milling followed by nitriding. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020, 500, 166383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shah, D.; Sharma, A.; Sharma, V.; Vishwakarma, V.; Sudhakar, A.; Shrivastav, P.; Varma, R. Microcrystalline Cellulose Decorated with Fe3O4 Nanoparticle Catalysts for the Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Thioglyoxamides. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023. [CrossRef]
  51. Li, T.; Luo, G.; Liu, K.; Li, X.; Sun, D.; Xu, L.; Li, Y.; Tang, Y. Encapsulation of Ni3Fe Nanoparticles in N-Doped Carbon Nanotube–Grafted Carbon Nanofibers as High-Efficiency Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysts. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1805828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, W.; Nam, J.; Park, J.; Lee, G.; Ahn, S.; Kim, K.; Lee, J.-O.; Choi, C.-J.; Hwang, J. Single process of pulsed wire discharge for defect healing and reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 2023, 201, 1184–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, X.; Huang, Z.; Yao, Y.; Qiao, H.; Zhong, G.; Pei, Y.; Zheng, C.; Kline, D.; Xia, Q.; Lin, Z.; et al. Continuous 2000 K droplet-to-particle synthesis. Mater. Today. 2020, 35, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chen, Y.-W.; Ruan, J.-J.; Ting, J.-M.; Su, Y.-H.; Chang, K.-S. Solution-based fabrication of high-entropy Ba(Ti,Hf,Zr,Fe,Sn)O3 films on fluorine-doped tin oxide substrates and their piezoelectric responses. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 11451–11458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sarkar, A.; Djenadic, R.; Usharani, N.; Sanghvi, K.; Chakravadhanula, V.; Gandhi, A.; Hahn, H.; Bhattacharya, S. Nanocrystalline multicomponent entropy stabilised transition metal oxides. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dąbrowa, J.; Stygar, M.; Miku, A.; Knapik, A.; Mroczka, K.; Tejchman, W.; Danielewski, M.; Martin, M. Synthesis and microstructure of the (Co,Cr,Fe,Mn,Ni)3O4 high entropy oxide characterized by spinel structure. Mater. Lett. 2018, 216, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jiang, Q.; Gu, J.; Zhang, L.; Liu, K.; Huang, M.; Liu, P.; Zuo, S.; Wang, Y.; Ma, P.; Fu, Z. A Highly Efficient High-Entropy Metal Hydroxymethylate Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 453, 139510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wu, D.; Kusada, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Toriyama, T.; Matsumura, S.; Kawaguchi, S.; Kubota, Y.; Kitagawa, H. Platinum-Group-Metal High-Entropy-Alloy Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 13833–13838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Broge, N.; Bondesgaard, M.; Søndergaard-Pedersen, F.; Roelsgaard, M.; Iversen, B. Autocatalytic Formation of High-Entropy Alloy Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 22104–22108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Grzesik, Z.; Smoła, G.; Miszczak, M.; Stygar, M.; Dąbrowa, J.; Zajusz, M.; Świerczek, K.; Danielewski, M. Defect structure and transport properties of (Co,Cr,Fe,Mn,Ni)3O4 spinel-structured high entropy oxide. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 835–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vinnik, D.; Trofimov, E.; Zhivulin, V.; Zaitseva, O.; Zherebtsov, D.; Starikov, A.; Sherstyuk, D.; Gudkova, S.; Taskaev, S. The new extremely substituted high entropy (Ba,Sr,Ca,La)Fe6-x(Al,Ti,Cr,Ga,In,Cu,W)xO19 microcrystals with magnetoplumbite structure. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 9656–9660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. High-entropy fluorite oxides. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38, 3578–3584. [CrossRef]
  63. Rekha, M.; Mallik, N.; Srivastava, C. First Report on High Entropy Alloy Nanoparticle Decorated Graphene. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jin, T.; Sang, X.; Unocic, R.; Kinch, R.; Liu, X.; Hu, J.; Liu, H.; Dai, S. Mechanochemical-Assisted Synthesis of High-Entropy Metal Nitride via a Soft Urea Strategy. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1707512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Prasad, H.; Singh, S.; Panigrahi, B. Mechanical activated synthesis of alumina dispersed FeNiCoCrAlMn high entropy alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 692, 720–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fritze, S.; Koller, C.; von Fieandt, L.; Malinovskis, P.; Johansson, K.; Lewin, E.; Mayrhofer, P.; Jansson, U. Influence of Deposition Temperature on the Phase Evolution of HfNbTiVZr High-Entropy Thin Films. Materials. 2019, 12, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, Y.; Yan, X.-H.; Liao, W.-B.; Zhao, K. Effects of Nitrogen Content on the Structure and Mechanical Properties of (Al0.5CrFeNiTi0.25)Nx High-Entropy Films by Reactive Sputtering. Entropy 2018, 20, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Manoj, T.; Perumal, H.; Paikaray, B.; Haldar, A.; Sinha, J.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Murapaka, C. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in a sputter deposited nanocrystalline high entropy alloy thin film. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 930, 167337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. He, L.; Liu, C.; Zhao, S.; Shu, C.; Yang, J.; Liu, H.; Zhang, W.; Lin, J.; Long, J.; Chang, H. Microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties of high hardness TiVZrCrAl HEA coatings prepared by magnetron sputtering. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 441, 128532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Löffler, T.; Meyer, H.; Savan, A.; Wilde, P.; Manjón, A.G.; Chen, Y.-T.; Ventosa, E.; Scheu, C.; Ludwig, A.; Schuhmann, W. Discovery of a Multinary Noble Metal–Free Oxygen Reduction Catalyst. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1802269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Meyer, H.; Meischein, M.; Ludwig, A. Rapid Assessment of Sputtered Nanoparticle Ionic Liquid Combinations. ACS Comb. Sci. 2018, 20, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yao, Y.; Huang, Z.; Xie, P.; Lacey, S.; Jacob, R.; Xie, H.; Chen, F.; Nie, A.; Pu, T.; Rehwoldt, M.; et al. Carbothermal shock synthesis of high-entropy-alloy nanoparticles. Science 2018, 359, 1489–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yang, Y.; Song, B.; Ke, X.; Xu, F.; Bozhilov, K.; Hu, L.; Shahbazian-Yassar, R.; Zachariah, M. Aerosol Synthesis of High Entropy Alloy Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2020, 36, 1985–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lacey, S.; Dong, Q.; Huang, Z.; Luo, J.; Xie, H.; Lin, Z.; Kirsch, D.; Vattipalli, V.; Povinelli, C.; Fan, W.; et al. Stable Multimetallic Nanoparticles for Oxygen Electrocatalysis. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 5149–5158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wu, Y.; Lei, Z.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Lu, Z. Eight in one: high-entropy-alloy nanoparticles synthesized by carbothermal shock. Sci. Bull. 2018, 63, 737–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yao, Y.; Huang, Z.; Xie, P.; Lacey, S.; Jacob, R.; Xie, H.; Chen, F.; Nie, A.; Pu, T.; Rehwoldt, M.; et al. Carbothermal shock synthesis of high-entropy-alloy nanoparticles. Science 2018, 359, 1489–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wu, H.; Lu, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Jiang, R.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, X.; Han, X.; Zhao, N.; et al. Rapid Joule-Heating Synthesis for Manufacturing High-Entropy Oxides as Efficient Electrocatalysts. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 6492–6500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xing, Y.; Dan, W.; Fan, Y.; Li, X. Low temperature synthesis of high-entropy (Y0.2Yb0.2Sm0.2Eu0.2Er0.2)2O3 nanofibers by a novel electrospinning method. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 103, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, Z.; Zhou, F.; Xu, B.; Guo, D. Characterization of novel high-entropy (La0.2Nd0.2Sm0.2Dy0.2Yb0.2)2Zr2O7 electrospun ceramic nanofibers. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 12074–12078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhu, H.; Zhu, Z.; Hao, J.; Sun, S.; Lu, S.; Wang, C.; Ma, P.; Dong, W.; Du, M. High-entropy alloy stabilized active Ir for highly efficient acidic oxygen evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 133251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Qiao, H.; Wang, X.; Dong, Q.; Zheng, H.; Chen, G.; Hong, M.; Yang, C.-P.; Wu, M.; He, K.; Hu, L. A high-entropy phosphate catalyst for oxygen evolution reaction. Nano Energy 2021, 86, 106029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. De Marco, M.; Baaziz, W.; Sharna, S.; Devred, F.; Poleunis, C.; Chevillot-Biraud, A.; Nowak, S.; Haddad, R.; Odziomek, M.; Boissière, C.; et al. High-Entropy-Alloy Nanocrystal Based Macro- and Mesoporous Materials. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 15837–15849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wang, X.; Dong, Q.; Qiao, H.; Huang, Z.; Saray, M.; Zhong, G.; Lin, Z.; Cui, M.; Brozena, A.; Hong, M.; et al. Continuous Synthesis of Hollow High-Entropy Nanoparticles for Energy and Catalysis Applications. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e2002853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kappe, C. Controlled Microwave Heating in Modern Organic Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6250–6284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, D.; Dai, R.; Zhang, X.; Liu, L.; Zhuang, H.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liao, Y.; Nian, Q. Scalable and controlled creation of nanoholes in graphene by microwave-assisted chemical etching for improved electrochemical properties. Carbon 2020, 161, 880–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tian, Y.; Sarwar, S.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, S.; Guo, Q.; Luo, J.; Zhang, X. Ultrafast microwave manufacturing of MoP/MoO2/carbon nanotube arrays for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2020, 24, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Huang, H.; Zhou, S.; Yu, C.; Huang, H.; Zhao, J.; Dai, L.; Qiu, J. Rapid and energy-efficient microwave pyrolysis for high-yield production of highly-active bifunctional electrocatalysts for water splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Qiao, H.; Saray, M.; Wang, X.; Xu, S.; Chen, G.; Huang, Z.; Chen, C.; Zhong, G.; Dong, Q.; Hong, M.; et al. Scalable Synthesis of High Entropy Alloy Nanoparticles by Microwave Heating. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 14928–14937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Colombo, R.; Garino, N.; Versaci, D.; Amici, J.; Para, M.; Quartarone, E.; Francia, C.; Bella, F.; Bodoardo, S. Designing a double-coated cathode with high entropy oxides by microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis for highly stable Li–S batteries. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 15690–15704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kheradmandfard, M.; Minouei, H.; Tsvetkov, N.; Vayghan, A.; Kashani-Bozorg, S.; Kim, G.; Hong, S.; Kim, D.-E. Ultrafast green microwave-assisted synthesis of high-entropy oxide nanoparticles for Li-ion battery applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 262, 124265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chang, S.-Q.; Cheng, C.-C.; Cheng, P.-Y.; Huang, C.-L.; Lu, S.-Y. Pulse electrodeposited FeCoNiMnW high entropy alloys as efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalysts for acidic water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Li, C. Activating multisite high-entropy alloy nanocrystals via enriching M–pyridinic N–C bonds for superior electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Sci. Bull. 2022, 67, 1890–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Marques, F.; Balcerzak, M.; Winkelmann, F.; Zepon, G.; Felderhoff, M. Review and outlook on high-entropy alloys for hydrogen storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 5191–5227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wu, J.; Ye, T.; Wang, Y.; Yang, P.; Wang, Q.; Kuang, W.; Chen, X.; Duan, G.; Yu, L.; Jin, Z.; et al. Understanding the Catalytic Kinetics of Polysulfide Redox Reactions on Transition Metal Compounds in Li–S Batteries. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 15734–15759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhao, Z.; Yi, Z.; Li, H.; Pathak, R.; Yang, Z.; Wang, X.; Qiao, Q. Synergetic effect of spatially separated dual co-catalyst for accelerating multiple conversion reaction in advanced lithium sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 2021, 81, 105621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, Z.; Ge, H.; Liu, S.; Li, G.; Gao, X. High–Entropy Alloys to Activate the Sulfur Cathode for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Energy Environ. Mater. 2022, eem2.12358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zheng, Y.; Yi, Y.; Fan, M.; Liu, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, R.; Li, M.; Qiao, Z.-A. A high-entropy metal oxide as chemical anchor of polysulfide for lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 23, 678–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Tian, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, S.; Li, G.; Gao, X. High-Entropy Spinel Oxide Nanofibers as Catalytic Sulfur Hosts Promise the High Gravimetric and Volumetric Capacities for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Energy Environ. Mater. 2022, 5, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kang, X.; Jin, Z.; Peng, H.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, L.; Li, X.; Xie, L.; Zhang, J.; Dong, Y. The role of selenium vacancies functionalized mediator of bimetal (Co, Fe) selenide for high-energy–density lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 637, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhao, J.; Lian, J.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J. A Review of In-Situ Techniques for Probing Active Sites and Mechanisms of Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Reactions. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 69234 g001
Figure 1. An overview of the main components of LSBs, the key pathways for limiting LiPSs, and the material changes during charging and discharging.
Figure 1. An overview of the main components of LSBs, the key pathways for limiting LiPSs, and the material changes during charging and discharging.
Preprints 69234 g001
Preprints 69234 g002
Figure 2. Four effects of high entropy materials.
Figure 2. Four effects of high entropy materials.
Preprints 69234 g002
Preprints 69234 g003
Figure 3. Six catalytic reaction progress of HEA-NPs. The six catalytic applications include: The NH3 decomposition reaction [36], Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) [37], Lithium−sulfur Batteries( LSBs), Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) [38], Methane Oxidation Reaction (MOR) [39], Formic Acid Oxidation Reaction (FAOR) [40].
Figure 3. Six catalytic reaction progress of HEA-NPs. The six catalytic applications include: The NH3 decomposition reaction [36], Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) [37], Lithium−sulfur Batteries( LSBs), Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) [38], Methane Oxidation Reaction (MOR) [39], Formic Acid Oxidation Reaction (FAOR) [40].
Preprints 69234 g003
Preprints 69234 g006
Figure 6. (a) Schematic diagram of mechanical alloying principle. (b) Representative compositional mapping result obtained from a nanoparticle. [63] (c) Two-step synthetic strategy and XRD patterns of HEMNs pyrolyzed at 600, 700, 800 (HEMN-1), and 900°C, respectively. [64].
Figure 6. (a) Schematic diagram of mechanical alloying principle. (b) Representative compositional mapping result obtained from a nanoparticle. [63] (c) Two-step synthetic strategy and XRD patterns of HEMNs pyrolyzed at 600, 700, 800 (HEMN-1), and 900°C, respectively. [64].
Preprints 69234 g006
Preprints 69234 g007
Figure 7. (a) Principle of sputtering deposition [67]. (b) Cross-sectional FE-SEM image of the ASD film. [68] (c) XRD patterns of the TiVZrCrAl coatings at different deposition temperatures, SAED pattern of the TiVZrCrAl coating deposited at 300 °C, cross sectional HRTEM image of the TiVZrCrAl coating, [69] (d) Preparation of HEA NPs by combined ionic liquid co-sputtering [70].
Figure 7. (a) Principle of sputtering deposition [67]. (b) Cross-sectional FE-SEM image of the ASD film. [68] (c) XRD patterns of the TiVZrCrAl coatings at different deposition temperatures, SAED pattern of the TiVZrCrAl coating deposited at 300 °C, cross sectional HRTEM image of the TiVZrCrAl coating, [69] (d) Preparation of HEA NPs by combined ionic liquid co-sputtering [70].
Preprints 69234 g007
Preprints 69234 g008
Figure 8. (a) Schematic representation of the process and capabilities of the CTS synthesis method. [74] (b) The synthesis route of nanoscale HEAs by making mixture of many elements. [75] (c)Kinetic formation simulation of MEA-NPs. (The hybrid Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics (MC-MD) approach.MD-MC simulation approach for the formation of an Ru-5 MEA-NP at 1500 K. The high temperature promotes the uniform mixing, while the high entropy stabilizes the structure). [36] (d) STEM based elemental maps of the HEA-Co25Mo45 nanoparticles at low- (upper panel) and high- (lower panel) resolutions. [48]
Figure 8. (a) Schematic representation of the process and capabilities of the CTS synthesis method. [74] (b) The synthesis route of nanoscale HEAs by making mixture of many elements. [75] (c)Kinetic formation simulation of MEA-NPs. (The hybrid Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics (MC-MD) approach.MD-MC simulation approach for the formation of an Ru-5 MEA-NP at 1500 K. The high temperature promotes the uniform mixing, while the high entropy stabilizes the structure). [36] (d) STEM based elemental maps of the HEA-Co25Mo45 nanoparticles at low- (upper panel) and high- (lower panel) resolutions. [48]
Preprints 69234 g008
Preprints 69234 g009
Figure 9. (a) Schematic diagram of electrospinning, SEM image of precursor of (Y0.2Yb0.2Sm0.2Eu0.2Er0.2)2O3 nanofibers and after 500°C calcination, and EDS images. [78](b) Typical nanofibers and composition spectra of HE-RE2Zr2O7 nanofibers sintered without insulation at 1000℃. [79](c)XPS spectra of FeCoNiIrRu/CNFs [80].
Figure 9. (a) Schematic diagram of electrospinning, SEM image of precursor of (Y0.2Yb0.2Sm0.2Eu0.2Er0.2)2O3 nanofibers and after 500°C calcination, and EDS images. [78](b) Typical nanofibers and composition spectra of HE-RE2Zr2O7 nanofibers sintered without insulation at 1000℃. [79](c)XPS spectra of FeCoNiIrRu/CNFs [80].
Preprints 69234 g009
Preprints 69234 g010
Figure 10. (a) Schematic illustration of the HEPi particles formation process [81]. (b) Schematic of the evolution of aerosol droplets during the high-temperature treatment [73]. (c) Scheme of the fabrication process of porous HEA-based particles by aerosol synthesis followed by thermal annealing [82] (d) HAADF-STEM image and HAADF-EDS elemental maps of an individual octonary CrMnFeCoNiPdRuIr hollow HEA nanoparticle. Scale bar: 100 nm. [83]
Figure 10. (a) Schematic illustration of the HEPi particles formation process [81]. (b) Schematic of the evolution of aerosol droplets during the high-temperature treatment [73]. (c) Scheme of the fabrication process of porous HEA-based particles by aerosol synthesis followed by thermal annealing [82] (d) HAADF-STEM image and HAADF-EDS elemental maps of an individual octonary CrMnFeCoNiPdRuIr hollow HEA nanoparticle. Scale bar: 100 nm. [83]
Preprints 69234 g010
Preprints 69234 g011
Figure 11. (a) Schematic illustration of the formation of HEA-NPs on rGO by microwave heating, HAADF-STEM image and STEM-EDS elemental mapping of a PtPdFeCoNi HEA-NPs. [88] (b) SEM image and EDS elemental mapping of (CoCuMgNiZn)O powder [89]. (c) Schematic diagram of microwave assisted synthesis. [90]
Figure 11. (a) Schematic illustration of the formation of HEA-NPs on rGO by microwave heating, HAADF-STEM image and STEM-EDS elemental mapping of a PtPdFeCoNi HEA-NPs. [88] (b) SEM image and EDS elemental mapping of (CoCuMgNiZn)O powder [89]. (c) Schematic diagram of microwave assisted synthesis. [90]
Preprints 69234 g011
Preprints 69234 g012
Figure 12. (a) Schematic diagram of preparation of H-FeCoNiMnW. (b) SEM image of H-FeCoNiMnW deposited on carbon paper. (c) TEM/EDX element mapping of H-FeCoNiMnW. [91]
Figure 12. (a) Schematic diagram of preparation of H-FeCoNiMnW. (b) SEM image of H-FeCoNiMnW deposited on carbon paper. (c) TEM/EDX element mapping of H-FeCoNiMnW. [91]
Preprints 69234 g012
Preprints 69234 g013
Figure 13. (a) The rate performance of several HEMs used in LSBs. (b) The charging -discharging voltage plateaus of the cathode and the corresponding products in LSBs. [94] (c) Schematic diagram of high entropy catalysts to reduce the polarization of LSBs.
Figure 13. (a) The rate performance of several HEMs used in LSBs. (b) The charging -discharging voltage plateaus of the cathode and the corresponding products in LSBs. [94] (c) Schematic diagram of high entropy catalysts to reduce the polarization of LSBs.
Preprints 69234 g013
Preprints 69234 g014
Figure 14. (a) Preparation schematic diagram, morphological characterization and (b) Electrochemical performance of assembled LSBs [28]. (c) Schematic illustration of the preparation of HEA–NC and acceleration for the conversion between LiPSs and Li2S2/Li2S on HEA–NC catalytic host and Rate capability. [96].
Figure 14. (a) Preparation schematic diagram, morphological characterization and (b) Electrochemical performance of assembled LSBs [28]. (c) Schematic illustration of the preparation of HEA–NC and acceleration for the conversion between LiPSs and Li2S2/Li2S on HEA–NC catalytic host and Rate capability. [96].
Preprints 69234 g014
Preprints 69234 g015
Figure 15. (a) Schematic illustration of cell configuration using HEMO-1 as chemical anchor of polysulfide in cathode for enhancing performance of LSBs. Geometry configuration of Li2S6 binding to HEMO-1. (The oxygen, nickel, magnesium, zinc, copper, cobalt, lithium and sulfur atoms are marked with red, white, orange, green, blue, purple, luminous yellow and light green, respectively. 2.276 Å and 1.842 Å are simulative bond distances of S-Ni and Li-O, respectively.). [97](b) XRD pattern, SEM images, Potentiostatic discharge profile at 2.05 V, and potentiostatic charge profile at 2.4 V. [98](c) Schematic diagram of microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis and electrochemical performance. [89].
Figure 15. (a) Schematic illustration of cell configuration using HEMO-1 as chemical anchor of polysulfide in cathode for enhancing performance of LSBs. Geometry configuration of Li2S6 binding to HEMO-1. (The oxygen, nickel, magnesium, zinc, copper, cobalt, lithium and sulfur atoms are marked with red, white, orange, green, blue, purple, luminous yellow and light green, respectively. 2.276 Å and 1.842 Å are simulative bond distances of S-Ni and Li-O, respectively.). [97](b) XRD pattern, SEM images, Potentiostatic discharge profile at 2.05 V, and potentiostatic charge profile at 2.4 V. [98](c) Schematic diagram of microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis and electrochemical performance. [89].
Preprints 69234 g015
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Sustainable Synthesis of Sulfur-Single Walled Carbon Nanohorns Composite for Long Cycle Life Lithium-Sulfur Battery

Eleonora Venezia

et al.

,

2022

Fe3C Decorated Folic Acid-Derived Graphene-Like Carbon as Polysulfide Catalyst for High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Battery

Zenghui Lin

et al.

,

2023

Optimization of Lithium Metal Anode Performance: Investigating the Interfacial Dynamics and Reductive Mechanism of Asymmetric Sulfonylimide Salts

Shuang Feng

et al.

,

2024

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated