Appendix A
Topology optimization is defined as making macroscopic changes between one or more materials. One of the materials can be considered void. In other words, in topology optimization, by defining the appropriate objective function and constraints, the material distribution in the specimen is optimized. In this method, the specimen is divided into elements and the density of the material is defined as a design variable. Then the properties of the elements are calculated. Some elements are removed and some take the properties of the material.
Figure A1 (a) shows a schematic of the solution to the problem in a discrete design. In this design each color corresponds to a material. Design variable in discrete design can be 0 or 1.
Figure A1.
The topology optimization including (a) discrete design and (b) continuous design (Note: White color is Material 1 and the black one is Material 2.) [
59].
Figure A1.
The topology optimization including (a) discrete design and (b) continuous design (Note: White color is Material 1 and the black one is Material 2.) [
59].
The optimization problem in the discrete design is defined according to Equation A1, as follows [
59],
In this equation, minimizing Ф is the goal of the problem, which includes C, which is a function of the variable of the problem design and is calculated according to Equation A2. C is an interpolation function that determines the properties of each element. These properties can express different physical values such as material stiffness, cost, etc.
is volume of the element (
) is the unit cell total volume, f is the volume fraction limit,
is the problem limit and
is the limit. The relationship of K(ρ)Ui = Fi also represents the finite element analysis for loading cases.
In this equation, C2 and C1 are the material tensors of the two components. If
=0, the element of the properties of the first material, and if
=1, the element of the properties of the second material is taken, and thus a discrete design is obtained. This design, it brings problems such as creating a design and geometric details that are very delicate and unmanufacturable. One of the ways to solve this problem is to use geometric constraints. In addition, the use of continuous variables is also suggested. In this method, design variables include any value between 0 and 1. As a result, the discrete optimization problem becomes a continuous problem according to
Figure A1 (b). This method is called the gray scheme [
60].
In continuous mode, the optimization problem is defined according to equation A3 [
59].
In this method, there is a possibility that the answers will end up in the middle values of the design variables. Therefore, to avoid this problem, different penalty plans are used. For example, it is possible to use the Solid Isotropic Material with a Penalization (SIMP) approach, where the design variable reaches the power of the penalty factor (p>1) and directs the solution toward the discrete values 0 and 1. In fact, despite continuous variables, it performs discrete solutions. In this case, the interpolator function is defined as Equation A4.
If the optimization of only one material is considered, the above relation can be replaced with Equation A5 [
61].
This relationship is used when one of the two materials in question is void. And if the optimization of two types of materials with the void is considered, equation A6 is used [
62].
Equation A4 can be extended to three materials [
63]:
In recent years, another interpolator function according to Equation A8 is used, which is called the modified SIMP method. In this method, the elastic modulus of the cavity is not considered zero to avoid the singularity of the stiffness matrix. One of the advantages of this method is that the elastic modulus and the penalty number is not dependent on each other. In this regard,
is the elastic modulus of the cavity [
64].
If the interpolator function C is related to the stiffness of the material, it depends on the young modulus and Poisson ratio of the material. In the case that the Poisson ratio is independent of the material density and this tensor is supposed to correspond to a composite material made of empty space and the given material with real density, the bulk modulus (K) and the shear modulus (μ) of the tensor (C) should cover the Hashin-ShtrikMan range.
For two-phase materials, one phase of which is void. This range is shown in Equation A9 [
61].
In this regard,
and
are the bulk modulus and shear modulus of the material in question. In this case, Equation A10 is calculated for the elastic modulus.
According to Equation A5, it can be written:
Equation A11 is true if and only if p is greater than 3. However, in the SIMP model, the Poisson ratio is assumed to be independent of density. In this case, according to the definitions of young modulus and shear modulus shown in Equation A12, the Hashin-Shtrikman range is rewritten as Equation A13:
From the above relationship, a condition for calculating the value of p according to Equation A14 is obtained.
For example, the p factor for materials with different Poisson ratios is shown in Equation A15.
In the 3D case, the Hashin-Shtrikman range leads to Equation A16:
In this case, for example, the number p is calculated as follows:
In general, the larger the p number, the better it is to remove average densities. But the solution time increases [
65]. Considering that the Poisson’s ratio for the materials used in this research is 1/3, therefore, the penalty number of 3 is also considered in the analyses carried out in this research.
In the optimization process, the impact of each design variable on the final response is important. For this reason, sensitivity analysis is performed to find out which variable has the greatest effect on the response. In sensitivity analysis, the effect of that parameter is calculated with the derivative of the desired parameter with respect to the design variable. The high importance of a parameter causes the solution to have more changes depending on the input variables.