3.1. Energetic Stability of the Complexes
The complexes analyzed are depicted in
Figure 1. They correspond to the stable conformations of TCDD and TCDF molecules adsorbed on a h-BNC model surface composed by a carbon nanodisk of ninety-six carbon atoms (C96) surrounded by a string of borazine rings. This model of h-BNC will be denoted as BNC96 and present a lower symmetry (D
3h) than the C96 carbon nanodisk (D
6h). In previous studies, where the interaction energies of aromatic molecules with carbon nanodisks of increasing size were compared [
88,
102], the C96 carbon structure was shown to provide interaction energies close to those found between an infinite graphene sheet and molecules of similar size to TCDD and TCDF. It must be also noted that the BNC96 structure was fully relaxed during the calculations of the adsorption complexes, giving rise to a significant bending of its structure.
The interaction energy and its different components are shown in
Table 1 for the complexes shown in
Figure 1. For the sake of comparison, the same data obtained previously for complexes formed by TCDD and TCDF adsorbed on a “pure” C96 carbon nanodisk are included in
Table 1 [
86]. As it can be observed from these data, the external borazine rings have a little influence on the interaction of the pollutants with the internal carbon nanodisk. Thus, neither the total interaction energy nor its components display significant differences between C96 and BNC96. The most important contribution to the formation of these complexes is by far the dispersion energy. Accordingly, the pollutants and the surfaces adopt stacking conformations with a molecule–surface distance inversely proportional to the magnitude of the interaction (3.2 and 3.3 Å for TCDD and TCDF, respectively). Moreover, the slightly lower interaction energy of the complexes formed with BNC96 with respect to C96 might be related to the bent structure adopted by the former, providing a more favourable balance between first order energies (electrostatic and Pauli) since the polarization energy (induction + dispersion) is practically the same in both surfaces.
3.2. Static Raman Spectra
Raman spectra obtained at static conditions for the isolated molecules and for the molecules adsorbed on BNC96 are shown in
Figure 2. The spectrum of the isolated TCDD is dominated by five peaks at 1302, 1323, 1554, 1661 and 1679 cm
-1. Vibrations associated with these peaks correspond to ring vibrations parallel to the molecular plane. It can be observed that these frequencies are slightly shifted in the BNC96-TCDD complex. A deeper analysis of these vibrational modes in the complex denotes an important contribution of the surface atoms, with weights of 57% and 34% for the most intense peaks at 1302 and 1679 cm
-1, respectively. Due to this large vibrational coupling with the surface, the Raman activity of these modes is enhanced in the complex, reaching an enhancement factor of 10 for the signal at 1679 cm
-1, even when the resonance mechanisms (electromagnetic and charge transfer) are omitted.
The spectrum of the isolated TCDF is dominated by four peaks at 1327, 1350, 1528 and 1727 cm
-1, which correspond to ring vibrations similar to those observed in TCDD. Due to the partial loss of symmetry in TCDF (C
2v) with respect to the centrosymmetric TCDD (D
2h), the Raman activities of the active modes in the isolated molecule are larger than in TCDD, and consequently the Raman intensities in the spectrum. Interestingly, the Raman activities of all the active modes, except one (1685 cm
-1), lessen when TCDF is adsorbed on BNC96. It can be observed in
Figure 2 that the peak at 1685 cm
-1, which shows a low intensity in the spectrum for the isolated molecule, is largely enhanced in the spectrum of the complex. It can be also extracted from these spectra that the intense peak in the complex correspond to the superposition of two vibrational modes with a scarce activity in the isolated molecule. The reason of the significant Raman enhancement of these modes in the complex is, as in the case of TCDD, the large vibrational coupling with the surface, with contributions of 62% and 42% of the surface atoms, respectively. As mentioned above, the Raman activity of the rest of modes decreases in the complex with respect to the isolated molecule, in these cases the vibrational coupling is much lower with contributions from the surface atoms that in no case exceed 5%.
In previous works, the static Raman spectra of aromatic molecules was found to be consistent with the electric polarizability changes experienced upon stacking interaction with a carbon surface [
74,
75]. Therefore, leaving out the two modes with a strong vibrational coupling with the surface, the decrease of the Raman activity in TCDF should stem from a decrease in the polarizability of the molecule in the complex. In order to confirm that, the polarizability tensor and the isotropic polarizability of the molecules isolated and adsorbed on BNC96 have been calculated and compared in
Table 2.
The results in
Table 2 confirm that the important decrease of the Raman activity of TCDF upon adsorption on BNC96 can be mainly associated with a decrease in its polarizability along the in-plane directions (
and
). These are the relevant components of the polarizability due to the in-plane character of the modes (ring vibrations) observed in the spectrum. In addition, one can see that despite the increase of the polarizability along the perpendicular direction (
), the isotropic polarizability is still significantly smaller in the complex. A nice pictorial view of this result is provided by
Figure 3 with the representation of the Hirshfeld-based total and interacting intrinsic polarizabilities of TCDD and TCDF. Considering first the isolated molecules (
Figure 3a and 3c), it is obvious the most polarizable regions, represented by orange lobes, are systematically centered on chlorine atoms due to several factors: they occupy peripheral positions and are singly bonded to one atom uniquely, in contrast with the carbon atoms; their electron density, coming presumably from electron lone pairs, can be more expanded and accessible to the effect of an electric field; and, finally, they are larger than the rest of atoms according to the atomic radius scale. The second most polarizable regions are centered on oxygen atoms, since they also accumulate an important fraction of electron density at lone pairs, as chlorine atoms, but are considerably smaller. Less polarizable regions are centered on carbon atoms, due to absence of electron lone pairs, their smaller atomic size and the fact that they are normally positively charged, in contrast to more electronegative atoms as oxygen and chlorine. The plots also reflect polarizability density distributed uniformly along the rings, characteristic of multicenter electron delocalization in aromatic systems. Regarding the molecules interacting with BNC96 (
Figure 3b and 3d), the most polarizable regions previously commented (corresponding to lone pairs of chlorine and oxygen atoms) are systematically the regions with larger reduction of the polarizability (in gray) in contrast with bonded regions, such as C−Cl, C−O or C−C. Curiously, this effect is highly localized, since multicenter electron delocalization seems to be affected negatively in view of the gray lobes found inside the rings. Therefore, the interaction with the surface can locally boost the aforementioned bonds to the detriment of reducing lone pairs and the multicenter electron delocalization of the molecule.
Summarizing, the results obtained here for TCDD and TCDF reflect the molecule-surface vibrational coupling is a key factor to interpret the static Raman spectra, provoking a significant Raman enhancement in those vibrational modes with a large contribution of the surface atoms. In contrast, the strong stacking interaction with the surface leads to a general decrease of the polarizability of the adsorbed molecules, which is reflected on a reduction of the Raman activity as long as the molecule-surface vibrational coupling is small, as already observed in previous works for different carbon allotropes [
74,
75].
3.3. Raman Spectra Under Pre-resonance Conditions and Laser Wavelengths
The characterization of the electronic transitions from the ground to the different excited states in the adsorption complexes is the first step to simulate pre-resonance Raman spectra. Subsequently, excitation wavelengths near those corresponding to the most intense transitions are included in the calculation of frequency-dependent polarizabilities and the corresponding Raman activities. In this case, the electronic absorption spectra for the isolated BNC96 structure and for the complexes of
Figure 1 were simulated using the results obtained from TDDFT calculations (see
Figure S1 in the Supplementary Material). The spectrum of BNC96 shows a very intense band around 513.6 nm, corresponding to two degenerate electronic transitions, x-polarized and y-polarized, respectively, with oscillator strengths of 2.560. These transitions are significantly stronger than those found for C96, where the oscillator strength was found to be 1.864 [
74,
75]. In addition, the absorption band in BNC96 is red-shifted with respect to C96 (457 nm) [
74,
75], making this band closer to the most employed laser source in SERS experiments (532 nm). In the complexes, this band is even more red-shifted to 518.8 nm and 518.0 nm for BNC96-TCDD and BCN96-TCDF, respectively, and corresponds, due to the loss of symmetry with respect to the isolated surface, to two quasi-degenerate electronic transitions with oscillator strengths of 2.368 and 2.313 for BNC96-TCDD and 2.364 and 2.286 for BNC96-TCDF.
The analysis of the DDs for the electronic transitions engaged in these bands allows discarding a significant charge transfer between surface and molecule, confirming that the excitations involve mainly electrons of the surface. The DDs obtained for the x-polarized electronic excitation in C96-TCDD and BNC96-TCDD complexes are represented in
Figure 4. Differences between the DD distribution in C96 and BNC96 are related to the different symmetry of the surface models, D
6h and D
3h, respectively. As it can be observed, the optical response is mainly located on the carbon nanodisk with a residual contribution from the borazine rings. This confinement of the optical response within the carbon structures in h-BNCs was previously observed and investigated at theoretical level [
81,
84]. Thus, the number of BN strings necessary to confine the optical response in a phenyl ring embedded within a h-BNC nanodisk of D
3h symmetry was found to be only two (a single string of borazine rings) [
81], so that enlarging our surface model BNC96 with more strings of borazine rings is not expected to modify significantly its optical response. The y-polarized excitation in BNC96-TCDD and excitations in BNC96-TCDF complex provide identical information and can be seen in
Figure S2 of the Supplementary Material.
On the other hand, the TDs for the same electronic excitations represented in
Figure 4 are shown in
Figure 5. Notice that the distribution of the TD reflects the polarization of the electronic mode (see the differences between x-polarized and y-polarized excitations in
Figure S3 of the Supplementary Material). The plots of
Figure 5 denote a highly polarized electronic mode strongly localized within the carbon structure. This high polarization is a characteristic feature of collective electronic excitations such as those involved in molecular plasmons, where a large transition dipole moment spans the entire system. On the other hand, a weak local polarization within each individual ring at the molecule-surface interacting region can be also observed. This local polarization opposes the global polarization of the mode. Furthermore, TD plots in the BNC96 complexes also reflect the low participation of the borazine rings and the molecule in the optical response, confirming its local confinement within the carbon nanodisk.
As aforementioned above, the dominant ground to excited state electronic transitions in BNC96-TCDD and BNC96-TCDF complexes are centered at 518.8 nm and 518.0 nm, respectively, involving electrons localized on the carbon nanodisk. These wavelengths might be used as reference to simulate the Raman spectra under pre-resonance conditions. However, the computational cost of these calculations forces the use of a lower basis set, as mentioned in the computational details section. TDDFT calculations show that the dominant ground to excited state electronic transitions are slightly blue-shifted with the lower basis set to 514.0 nm and 514.2 nm for BNC96-TCDD and BNC96-TCDF complexes, respectively. The oscillator strengths for these excitations are very similar to those obtained with the larger basis set. In order to avoid numerical problems when solving the CPDFT equations at resonance conditions, a detuning of ~2 nm in the excitation wavelength with respect to the resonance wavelength was applied to simulate pre-resonance Raman spectra [
103]. In addition, Raman spectra were also simulated using, as electromagnetic perturbations, typical laser wavelengths (488 nm and 532 nm) employed in SERS experiments. These are the most interesting spectra, as they give us a more realistic prediction of the expected Raman enhancement under experimental conditions.
The spectra obtained under incident wavelengths blue-shifted by 2 nm with respect to resonance are shown in
Figure 6. These spectra are represented using the same scale for the Raman activity as in the static spectra, only changing the multiplicative factors indicated next to the axis. Comparing the factors of pre-resonance spectra with those of the static spectra, it can be observed that the Raman enhancement in TCDD and TCDF complexes reaches 10
8 and 10
7, respectively. Practically the same enhancements are observed under incident wavelengths red-shifted 2 nm with respect to resonance (see
Figure S6).
Since the electromagnetic response is mainly located on the surface, those vibrational modes from the molecules with the largest vibrational couplings with the surface atoms are expected to display the largest Raman enhancements. It can be observed that, effectively, the largest Raman enhancements are found for signals which were already enhanced in the static spectra: for TCDD at 1302 and 1679 cm-1 and for TCDF at 1685 cm-1, which are precisely those vibrational modes with the highest vibrational coupling with the surface. On the other hand, noticeable enhancements are also found at 1248 cm-1 and 1350 cm-1 for BNC96-TCDF, which correspond to signals associated with vibrational modes with a small vibrational coupling with the surface, with a weight of the surface atoms of 1.4% and 0.4%, respectively).
Raman spectra obtained under an excitation wavelength of 532 nm are shown in
Figure 7. The spectra obtained under an excitation wavelength of 488 nm are shown in
Figure S7 of the Supplementary Material. Both lead to the same conclusions, so that only the results obtained with 532 nm will be discussed here. In this case, the hypothetical spectra obtained by neglecting the contribution to the Raman activity of the surface atoms or the contribution of the molecule are also shown. They provide a pictorial view of the effect of the molecule-surface vibrational coupling on the Raman spectra of the pollutants.
There are clear similarities between the pre-resonance Raman spectra discussed above and those shown in
Figure 7. Thus, the shape of the spectra is quite similar with the same enhanced peaks. Since the laser wavelength is significantly red-shifted with respect to resonance (around 18 nm) the Raman enhancement decreases with respect to pre-resonance spectra, although it is still large, with enhancements around 10
4 for both molecules, being slightly larger in TCDD. As it can be extracted from the molecule-surface decomposition of the Raman spectrum of BNC96-TCDD, the largest enhancement comes from the surface contribution. The enhancement associated with the molecule lies in a lower scale, so that no signals can be observed in
Figure 7c. On the contrary, in the BNC96-TCDF spectrum (
Figure 7b) both the molecule and the surface contributions lie in the same scale and depending on the vibrational mode the enhancement is mainly due to one or the other (see
Figure 7d and 7f). For instance, the contribution of the molecule is clearly dominant at 1727 cm
-1. This is due to the fact that, in this complex, the molecule-surface vibrational coupling of some modes is significantly lower than in the TCDD complex. Anyway, the enhancement of the most intense peak of the spectrum, located at 1685 cm
-1, is mainly due to the contribution of the surface atoms (
Figure 7f). As mentioned in the previous section, this signal is already enhanced in the static spectrum because of the large vibrational coupling with the surface atoms of the modes associated with it.