Preprint
Article

Bibliometric Study of Authorship Pattern Literature

Altmetrics

Downloads

131

Views

44

Comments

0

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

06 April 2023

Posted:

07 April 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of scholarly publications of Authorship Pattern. The present study covers 1723 research papers published in the area of authorship pattern and indexed in Scopus database from the year 2013 to 2022. These research publications considered for the present study have been analysed based on their year wise growth, pattern of authorship, times citations, type of publication, most productive publication source as well as countries and institutions. The study shows the positive growth of the literatures with collaborative authorship pattern and good citation status. This original research paper will be helpful to the researchers of library and information science, especially who are working in the area of bibliometrics studies.
Keywords: 
Subject: Social Sciences  -   Library and Information Sciences

Introduction

Authorship study is a type of bibliometric analysis that focuses on examining the patterns and characteristics of authorship in scholarly publications (Khaparde & Pawar, 2013). This includes analysing the number of authors per publication, author affiliations, author collaborations, author productivity, and author impact (Mahapatra, 2002). In authorship studies, bibliometric techniques are used to analyse large datasets of scholarly publications to identify patterns and trends related to authorship (Bandyopadhyay, 2001). In recent years, most of the research has been conducted jointly for the overall growth of information communication technology worldwide (Patra, Bhattacharya & Verma, 2006; Kirtania, 2021). This collaboration pattern may have one to multiple authors, and may involve domestic or international researchers from any organization in the country, starting with colleagues from the same organization (Kirtania & Chakrabarti, 2018). In recent times, there has been a lot of work on authorship patterns, but the current status of existing publications on authorship pattern, growth, times cited, core publication source should be analyzed. This is done in the present paper, with the help of bibliometric analysis, as bibliometric analysis is a quantitative research method that involves the use of statistical and computational techniques to analyze the characteristics and patterns of scholarly publications (Patra, Bhattacharya & Verma, 2006).

Objectives

The objectives of this study are:
  • to examine the year wise growth of the publications. and their citations.
  • to trace out the authorship pattern of these publications and
  • to analyse the citation count, type of publications, most productive affiliated institutes and country of the publications.

Methodology

Scope & Coverage: This study covers 1723 research publications on “authorship pattern” and indexed in Scopus database from 2013 to 2022.
Method Used: First, the Scopus database was searched for publications using the term “authorship pattern,” and then the papers from the ten-year period of 2013 to 2022 were retrieved by applying data filtering to the results. As a result of the query and filtering, 1723 papers on authorship pattern were found and selected for the present study. Each publication was then assessed for bibliographic data collection, such as year of publication, number of authors, affiliated country and institute, times cited, and type of publication. The raw data were collected, stored, organized, and presented separately in MS-Excel. The data were then tabulated, analysed and interpreted to draw final conclusions.

Data Analysis and Findings

Literature Growth: Table 1 describes the year-wise distribution of publications related to authorship patterns. It can be seen that a total of 1723 research papers have been published on authorship patterns in the ten years from 2013 to 2022, which is statistically significant. Looking at the year-on-year publication growth (Figure 1), it is easy to see a positive trend (y = 15.618x + 86.4). In terms of individual year-wise publications, 310 articles were published in 2021, followed by 2020, 2019, and 2022, respectively. Although the publication trend is positive, the number of research papers published in 2022 has decreased slightly, which does not follow this trend line.
Authorship Patten & Degree of Collaboration: Table 2 describes the authorship pattern of the publications. It can be seen that only 18.75% of all published articles were written by single authors, while the majority were written by joint or collaborative authors. Among the collaborative research works, the number of articles published by two authors is the highest at 30.18%, followed by three authors (21.76%) and four authors (13.87%). The degree of collaboration indicates the trend of collaborative authorship pattern among the authors for publishing papers (Subramanyam, 1983). The average degree of collaboration is 0.81, which clearly indicates a slight dominance of joint authors in the field of authorship pattern.” Degree of Collaboration is calculated by simple formula that is (DC) = N m N m + N s where Nm is the number of multi-authored papers, and Ns is number of single authored papers (Subramanyam, 1983).
Citation Status: Table 3 presents the citation count for the publications, and it shows that three-quarters of the 1723 papers have received at least one citation, which is quite impressive. Furthermore, 420 articles have been cited 10 or more times, representing about 24% of all publications, which is a significant statistic in terms of citations. Analyzing the citation behavior from this table, it can be concluded that the articles on this topic are of high quality, which is why they have received a considerable number of citations.
Publication Source:Table 4 shows the top ten sources of publication, and it can be seen that papers on authorship patterns are published in reputed journals all over the world, indicating that these papers are of very good quality. Among the publication sources, Library Philosophy and Practice occupied the first place with 21.71% of the total publications, followed by Scientometrics (82), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, and others.
Most productive countries:Table 5 describes of the publications by country shows that India tops the list with 504 articles published, followed by the United States (302) and the United Kingdom (98). In addition, countries such as China, Spain, Canada, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, Germany, and Pakistan have also made significant contributions to the research on authorship patterns.
Productive Institutions: An analysis of the institutional affiliations (Table 6) of the authors shows that prestigious educational institutions from around the world are associated with these research publications. Periyar University has occupied the number one position in the list by publishing 30 articles, followed by other reputed institutes such as Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (29), Alagappa University (24), and Banaras Hindu University (22), among others.
Type of Publication: From the above table it can be seen that out of the total papers, research articles are the most published type of publication, thereafter conference paper, review, book chapter and conference review respectively have been published. A variety of topics have been published on authorship patterns, which can be considered a very significant finding of this present study.

Conclusion

Currently, researchers are working on various topics ranging from domestic to national and international levels. In this context, the aim of authorship studies is to analyse all the parameters associated with publications in any research field. Authorship studies have been conducted on various subjects, from science to humanities and social sciences in the past. Analysing the current state of research publications on authorship studies was essential and the main objective of this work. This study shows that the publication growth trend of authorship patterns has been very positive, with joint authorship patterns found in these publications, and high-quality sources of publication. Additionally, the citations of the papers indicate that publications on this topic are highly cited, which is significant. Analysing these parameters suggests that more quantitative research should be conducted in the future by applying authorship studies to other disciplines.

References

  1. Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2001). Authorship pattern in different disciplines. Annals of library and information studies, 48(4), 139-147.
  2. Khaparde, V., & Pawar, S. (2013). Authorship pattern and degree of collaboration in Information Technology. Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 1(1), 46-54.
  3. Kirtania, D. K. (2021). Authorship Pattern of Library Philosophy and Practice Journal: A Bibliometrics Analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 6021.
  4. Kirtania, D. K., & Chakrabarti, B. (2018). Authorship pattern of open access social science journals published in India. Journal of Information Management, 5(1), 1-6. (. [CrossRef]
  5. Mahapatra, G. (2000). Bibliometric Studies: On Indian Library & Information Science Literature. Delhi: Crest Publishing.
  6. Patra, S. K., Bhattacharya, P., & Verma, N. (2006). Bibliometric study of literature on bibliometrics. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology, 26(1), 27-32. [CrossRef]
  7. Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33-38. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Publication Growth of the Authorship Pattern.
Figure 1. Publication Growth of the Authorship Pattern.
Preprints 70624 g001
Table 1. Year wise distribution of publications.
Table 1. Year wise distribution of publications.
Year Documents Percentage % Change
2013 114 6.62 N/A
2014 118 6.85 3.39
2015 129 7.49 8.53
2016 158 9.17 18.35
2017 139 8.07 -13.67
2018 156 9.05 10.90
2019 197 11.43 20.81
2020 212 12.30 7.08
2021 310 17.99 31.61
2022 190 11.03 -63.16
Total 1723 100.00 N/A
Table 2. Authorship pattern of the papers.
Table 2. Authorship pattern of the papers.
Number of Author Number of Papers Percentage
One 323 18.75
Two 520 30.18
Three 375 21.76
Four 239 13.87
Five 125 7.25
More than five 141 8.18
Total 1723 100.00
Table 3. Time Cited of the publications.
Table 3. Time Cited of the publications.
Time Cited Number of Papers Percentage
0 459 26.64
1 226 13.12
2 148 8.59
3 108 6.27
4 87 5.05
5 73 4.24
6 69 4.00
7 49 2.84
8 41 2.38
9 43 2.50
10 29 1.68
>10 391 22.69
Total 1723 100.00
Table 4. Top Ten Source of Publication.
Table 4. Top Ten Source of Publication.
Publication Source Number of Papers Percentage Rank
Library Philosophy and Practice 374 21.71 1
Scientometrics 82 4.76 2
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 45 2.61 3
DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology 34 1.97 4
Plos One 31 1.80 5
Journal Of Informetrics 18 1.04 6
Annals Of Library and Information Studies 15 0.87 7
Current Science 12 0.70 8
Ceur Workshop Proceedings 9 0.52 9
International Journal of Information Science and Management 9 0.52 9
Science And Technology Libraries 8 0.46 10
Table 5. Most productive countries.
Table 5. Most productive countries.
Country Number of Papers Percentage
India 504 29.25
United States 302 17.53
United Kingdom 98 5.69
China 95 5.51
Spain 95 5.51
Canada 58 3.37
Brazil 56 3.25
Saudi Arabia 56 3.25
Germany 55 3.19
Pakistan 55 3.19
Table 6. Top Ten Most Productive Institution.
Table 6. Top Ten Most Productive Institution.
Institution Name Number of Papers Percentage Rank
Periyar University 30 1.74 1
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University 29 1.68 2
Alagappa University 24 1.39 3
Banaras Hindu University 22 1.28 4
Universitat de València 19 1.10 5
Annamalai University 17 0.99 6
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences 17 0.99 6
Universidade de São Paulo 16 0.93 7
University of Kashmir 15 0.87 8
University of Delhi 15 0.87 8
Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology, Bhubaneswar 14 0.81 9
Prince Sultan University 13 0.75
Chinese Academy of Sciences 13 0.75
Mizoram University 13 0.75
Table 7. Type of Publication.
Table 7. Type of Publication.
Type of publication Number of Papers Percentage
Article 1315 76.32
Conference Paper 205 11.90
Review 111 6.44
Book Chapter 35 2.03
Conference Review 21 1.22
Erratum 15 0.87
Book 8 0.46
Note 6 0.35
Letter 3 0.17
Short Survey 2 0.12
Editorial 1 0.06
Retracted 1 0.06
Total 1723 100
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated