Preprint
Article

Factors Associated with Atopic Dermatitis among Children Aged 6 To 14 Years in Alimosho Local Government, Lagos, Nigeria

Altmetrics

Downloads

118

Views

42

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

12 April 2023

Posted:

13 April 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
There has been a rise in the prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) globally especially in low-and middle-income countries such as Nigeria. The condition has been linked to genetic predisposes, living conditions, and environmental factors. Environmental factors are considered a significant contributor to AD in low- and middle-income countries. This study determined the prevalence of AD in southwestern Nigeria and identified risk factors in home and school environments that children aged 6 to 14 years are exposed to. A cross-sectional study was adopted, and the total sample size was 349. Four randomly selected health facilities were used for the study. A questionnaire was used to determine the risk factors in the population. Data analysis was done using the latest version of Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). The prevalence of atopic dermatitis in this study is 25%. Atopic dermatitis was found to be common in females ( 27%). Children who lived where trucks pass on the street almost daily had the highest cases of atopic dermatitis (28%). Children with rugs in their houses and those whose houses are surrounded by bushes also had higher cases of atopic dermatitis at 26% and 26% respectively. Children who played on school grass, attended creche with rubber toys, and attended a school where wooden chairs and chalkboards were used had higher numbers of AD cases at 26%, 26%, 28%, and 27% respectively. This study identified home and school exposure that predisposes children to AD. It is envisaged that the study will serve as a basis for possible research on evidence-based treatment options.
Keywords: 
Subject: Public Health and Healthcare  -   Public, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent, most common chronic skin condition in children. It is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterised by pruritus and common in pediatric dermatology clinics [1,2,3,4]. AD has a significant impact on the quality of life amongst children while indirectly affecting their families [5,6]. The physical impact of this condition on children includes irritability, excessive crying, and sleep disturbances while its social impact include stigma due to visible skin condition [7]. This worldwide skin condition burden is treatable and preventable. Preventing the occurrence of this disease would help reduce its physical, social and economic impact [8]. Scientific evidence further shows that a combination of genetic and environmental factors are contributory factors towards the development of AD [9].
Several cross-sectional studies have identified the association between environmental factors and AD but only few factors like air pollution and keeping of pets were discovered [10,11]. A study carried out in Abuja; Nigeria also noted that AD was associated with dry season [12]. With respect to the burden of AD, there are more environmental factors yet to be identified. A study in 2019 also identified this gap and noted that further studies are required to identify other environmental factors [13]. One of the identified gaps is that guardians and parents have little knowledge on the causes of atopic dermatitis [14]. However, it is reported that some are aware of the hereditary component of this skin disease but believe that other factors are the main triggers not all the children from the same family bloodline develop the disease [15]. Thomsen and colleagues noted that there is a sevenfold increased risk of AD in affected twin of identical twins unlike a threefold risk in second twin of fraternal twins [16]. Children whose parents have allergies are more likely to develop atopic dermatitis than children of parents without allergic conditions [17,18]. Despite this clear genetic predisposition for AD, evidence suggests that environmental factors contribute significantly in the development of the disease [19].
Identification of the factors triggering this disease, in the home and school environments as well as educating parents and guardians on these will help them take caution while caring for their children during infancy and childhood [20]. Direct medical costs, direct family care costs and indirect costs associated with loss of productivity of parents may also be reduced [21].
The diagnosis of atopic dermatitis is made using the Hanifin and Rajka criteria. This requires that the individual presents with a pruritic rash and three or more of the following features: history of rash in the skin creases (fold of the elbow, behind the knees, front of the ankles and around the neck), a personal or family history of asthma and hay fever, history of generalized dry skin (xerosis), onset before the age of 2 years and visible flexural dermatitis [22]. In 2004 Nnoruka, noted that the symptoms these children present with varies according to ethnicity [23]. However, the internationally acceptable criteria remain the Hanifin and Rajka criteria and will be used in making a diagnosis of AD in this study.
Atopic dermatitis has proven to be a dermatological disease of public health importance due to its rising prevalence over the years. The literature review showed that despite genetic factors being associated with atopic dermatitis, there seems to be environmental factors that triggers the onset of the disease. To our knowledge, there are limited studies have been done in Nigeria especially in the southwestern part to identify these factors, hence the need for this study which determined the prevalence, identified home related and school related risk factors of atopic dermatitis. It also determined the association between these factors and atopic dermatitis. The aim of the study was to determine environmental factors associated with atopic dermatitis amongst children aged 6 to 14 years in Alimosho Local Government, Lagos, Nigeria. While the specific objectives of the study were to:
  • to determine the prevalence of AD among children aged 6 to 14 years;
  • to determine household risk factors of AD amongst study participants;
  • to determine school-related risk factors of AD amongst study participants; and
  • to establish the association between AD and risk factors in the study population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

An observational cross sectional study design was adopted for this research project. The study was conducted over a period of 3 months.

2.2. Study Population

This study was conducted at four private health facilities in Alimosho Local Government of Lagos State, Nigeria. Alimosho is a Local Government Area in the Ikeja Division of Lagos State, Nigeria. It is the largest local government in Lagos, with over two million inhabitants. The study population consisted of children aged 6 to 14 years who attended the health facilities chosen for the study. The ISAAC phase three study on atopic dermatitis was within the same age group. Any child less than 6years or greater than 14years was excluded from this study. The study only included children aged 6 to 14years diagnosed with atopic dermatitis and other dermatological conditions, whose parents gave consent and children whose parents did not give consent was excluded.

2.3. Sampling Approach

There were 12 private health facilities in Alimosho local government targeted as a study site. However, the researcher allocated numbers from one to twelve. Thereafter three facilities were drawn by choosing every third facility on the list. While the participants were purposively selected, once they were diagnosed. The practicing physician gave information about the study to the caregiver of any child aged 6 to 14 diagnosed with AD and other dermatological conditions during the period of the study. The physician also identified those with atopic dermatitis by giving them a paper as ‘A’ while those who was managed for other dermatological conditions other than atopic dermatitis as ‘B’. They approached us for participation in the study after being referred by their physician. The participants selection process was repeated until the desired sample size was reached. The sample size was determined using EPI INFO 7.2 (Centre for Disease Control and Prevention). The following parameters were used when calculating the sample; the confidence level as 95%, power as 95%, prevalence in general population (unexposed) as 8.5%, prevalence in exposed as 30.4% [23]. Therefore, the total sample size calculated is 290. To compensate for non-respondent and invalid forms, the calculated sample size was increased by 20% to get the final sample size for the study which is 349

2.5. Data Analysis

The variables analysed include sociodemographic factors, factors in the home and factors in the school environment. Cross tabulations were used to determine the prevalence and identify risk factors in home and school environments. This data was analysed using SPSS version 28. Specific data analysis by objectives were conducted as follows:
Objective i: frequency distribution was used to quantify the prevalence of atopic dermatitis among children aged 6 to 14 years in Alimosho Local Government, Lagos, Nigeria. Tables and graphs were used to summarize the data.
Objective ii: frequency distributions, cross tabulations, binary and multivariate logistic regressions models were used to explore the relationship between atopic dermatitis among children aged 6 to 14 years in Alimosho Local Government, Lagos Nigeria, and socio-demographic factors. P-values (0.05) was used to test if the relationship is statistically significant.
Objective iii: frequency distributions, cross tabulations, binary and multivariate logistic regressions models were used to explore the relationship between atopic dermatitis among children aged 6 to 14 years in Alimosho Local Government, Lagos Nigeria, and risk factors in home environment. P-values (0.05) was used to test if the relationship is statistically significant.
Objective iv: frequency distributions, cross tabulations, binary and multivariate logistic regressions models were used to explore the relationship between atopic dermatitis among children aged 6 to 14 years in Alimosho Local Government, Lagos Nigeria, and risk factors in school environment. P-values (0.05) as used to test if the relationship is statistically significant.

3. Results

These results are presented according to the objectives of the study, and these include: to determine the prevalence, household risk factors and school-related risk factors of AD among children aged 6 to 14 years in Alimosho Local Government, Lagos, Nigeria. Lastly, it presents the association between AD and risk factors in the study population. There were 86 (25%) participants that had AD, while there were 263 (75%) of participants without AD. Therefore, the prevalence of AD in this study was 25% as shown in Figure 1.

3.1. Participants’ characteristics

As presented in the Table 1 below, the age group 9-11years had the highest cases of atopic dermatitis which is 27% (n=31). More cases [28% (n=44)] of AD occurred in females unlike in males with 22% (n=42) of cases. The statistical comparison between the characsteristics of study participants was not significant, however; the income of mothers representing cases was significantly different to the referent group (p< .048).

3.2. Household Related Risk Factors

Children whose parents have no specific fuel for cooking have the highest number of cases at 27% (n=27). Also, children who live where trucks pass on their street almost every day showed the highest number of cases at 28% (n=26). Those children who do not have cats and dogs in their home have the highest number of cases at 27% (n=44) and 26% (n=42) respectively. Those whose mothers/female guardian do not smoke have the highest number of cases at 29% (n=51) while there was no difference in percentage between children of fathers/male guardian who smokes [25% (n=45)]. Children who live in houses with bushes around have higher percentage at 26% (n=44). Children who do not use cleaning agents like JIK in their homes have higher percentage at 25% (n=42). Children who did not have rubber toys in their house have higher number of AD cases at 25% (n=43). Children who use rug in their house have higher number of AD cases at 26% (n=48). Children who took seafood and nuts about 4-6 times in a week have the highest percentage at 33% (n=30) and 27% (n=22) respectively. Children who ate meat, vegetables, butter and egg more than 6times in a week have the highest percentage at 29% (n=25), 26% (n=27), 25% (n=22) and 28% (n=26) respectively. Children who took cereal and milk about 1-3 times in a week also have the highest percentage of AD cases at 34% (n=29) and 29% (n=28). Children who did not take fruits pasta, rice, butter, margarine and potatoes have the highest percentage at 33% (n=32), 28% (n=26), 28% (n=26), 25% (24), 30% (27), and 34% (n=32) respectively.

3.3. School Related Risk Factors

From the Table 2 below, it can be deduced that children who played on school grass, attended creche with rubber toys, attended school where wooden chairs, chalkboard were used have higher number of AD cases at 26% (n=40), 26% (n=51), 28% (n=52), 28% (n=48) respectively. On the other hand, children who did not attend school surrounded by bushes and who did not attend school surrounded by stagnant water also have higher percentage of AD cases at 26% (n=45) and 28% (n=51) respectively.

3.4. Association Between Atopic Dermatitis And Risk Factors

From Table 3 below, it can be inferred that the odds of having atopic dermatitis was 2.6 more higher among children who took fruits 4-6 times in a week than those who did not take fruits at all [AOR (2.60), 95%CI (1.14, 5.91)]. Also, children who ate potatoes 4-6times a week were 4.5 times likely to report atopic dermatitis than those who did not eat potatoes at all [AOR (4.49), 95% CI (1.88, 10.70)].

4. Discussion

The study's objectives were to determine the prevalence of atopic dermatitis and identify home. School related risk factors that predispose children in Alimosho Local Government, Lagos, Nigeria to atopic dermatitis and the association of these risk factors to the disease under study. A total of 349 participants were included in the study, 86 participants had atopic dermatitis while 263 participants did not have atopic dermatitis. The prevalence of atopic dermatitis in this study was 25%. The finding is higher than other studies conducted in Nigeria, which reported a prevalence of 13% and 9%, in Northern and Southern Nigeria, respectively [49]. However, it was lower than in a South African study that reported 60.1% prevalence [34]. This study was conducted during the dry season and might have brought about the increased prevalence noted in this study. A study in Abuja, Nigeria noted that there is an increased risk of developing AD during dry season [12].
The study shows that atopic dermatitis was common amongst females (27.5%) compared to males (22.2%) with ratio of 0.8 (male) to 1 (female). The study findings were similar to a local study conducted elsewhere in Nigeria among children aged 0-16 years that showed a preponderance ratio to females [24]. While another local study conducted in northern Nigeria showed that AD was common in males compared to females [25]. This might be due to the culture difference that permits male to move freely unlike females in the Northern part of the country, therefore males could report in hospital more than females.
Children who live where trucks pass almost every day on the street had higher number of AD cases 28% (n=26). Previous studies have linked frequent truck movement to air pollution in untarred roads in residential areas [26]. Consequently, air pollution is a known risk factor AD [27]. He also argued that air pollutants appear to be one of the risk factors for developing AD. Furthermore, air pollutants exposure can lead to imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants thereby culminating in oxidative stress on the skin that presents as features of AD [28]. Children who live in houses surrounded by bushes also had a higher percentage of AD 26% (n=44). Elsewhere, Montealegre and colleagues noted that patients with AD showed positive skin reactions to animal, plant and fungal allergens [29]. The exposure to these allergens due to environmental surroundings could contribute to triggering allergic reactions that results in exacerbate AD [29].
Children who played on school grass, attended creche with rubber toys, attended school where wooden chairs, chalkboard had higher prevalence at 26.3%, 26.3%, 27.7%, 26.7% respectively. Werner and colleagues argued that grass pollen is one of the factors that predisposes an individual to developing AD as his study revealed worsening of AD when participants were exposed to grass pollen [30]. also noted that rubber materials such as rubber toys contain latex [31]. A Bolivian case study reported that wood is capable of causing allergies as it contains allergen such as quinones, stilbenes, phenols, and terpenes [32]. He reported that the allergens found in the wood led to the case developing chronic dermatitis [32]. Lastly, metals in blackboard chalk are likely to trigger AD due to allergic reaction [33].
Mother’s employment status (p=0.038 was found to be associated with AD. In addition, mother’s monthly income [AOR=3.66, 95%CI (1.67, 7.80] was associated with AD as children of mothers who are paid between 50,000naira and 100,000naira are 3.66times at risk of developing AD. This shows that AD is associated with higher maternal socio-economic status [30]. Similar to the findings from a study conducted in the city of Tehran among children aged 6 to 14 years old, socioeconomic was a risk factor to AD [34]. It might be that people with high socioeconomic status are able to purchase more materials and food that exposes the child to several allergens.

5. Strength and limitations

This study was conducted at four private health facilities in Alimosho Local Government, Lagos state and focuses on children attending the health facilities and it also concentrated on one state out of the thirty-six states in Nigeria, therefore generalizing the results to other states and countries might bring doubts. If this study was conducted in public hospitals and in rural areas, more predisposing factors might have been identified. Children spend most of their times at home and in school, hence this study identified risk factors in the home and school environment that predisposes children to developing atopic dermatitis. It would help policy makers make policies that would reduce exposure of children to these factors. Parents would be enlightened on these risk factors and would be advised to reduce or prevent exposure of their children to them. School owners would be educated and enlightened on how some factors in the school environment can predispose a child to this chronic skin disease and its possible physical, social, and mental impacts on such children. Policy makers would be advised to make policies on what the school environment should look like. Clinicians would benefit by having a focused treatment plan on atopic dermatitis.

6. Conclusions

The study has drawn attention to the factors around the home environment like trucks passing in the street and bushes around the house as they are more likely to lead to atopic dermatitis compared to those within the home environment. It also drawn attention to some food like meat, vegetables, butter and egg which showed high prevalence in these children. Factors in the school environment like grass, wooden chairs, chalkboard and rubber toys in creche were also identified as risk factors for atopic dermatitis. There is a need to address the general public to look outward and pay attention to the surroundings where they live in other to reduce the incidence of atopic dermatitis. Schools also need advancement in their technology by using markets, plastic chairs and tables and ensuring a tidy environment. Further studies need to be carried out at a larger scale and that will include several local governments in the state.

Author Contributions

“Conceptualization, O.K. and T.P. ; methodology, O.K. and T.P.; validation O.K. and T.P..; formal analysis, O.K.; investigation, O.K.; resources, O.K.; data curation, O.K.; writing—original draft preparation, O.K.; writing—review and editing, C.M.; P.C. R. and T.P.; visualization, T.P; supervision, T.P.; project administration, O.K. “All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

“The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (Research Ethics Committee); University of Johannesburg Research Ethics Committee (REC-1684-2022,23/08/2022), Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (IRB/22/052, 24/11/2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study can be made available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The researchers acknowledge the participants and their parents for volunteering taking part in the study. We also, acknowledge the medical practitioner who assisted with the referrals—a special acknowledgement to the institutions that granted us with scientific and ethical approval.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Waidyatillake NT, Dharmage SC, Allen KJ, Bowatte G, Boyle RJ, Burgess JA, et al. Association between the age of solid food introduction and eczema: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Allergy [Internet]. 2018 Aug 23;48(8):1000–15. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cea.13140.
  2. Kapur S, Watson W, Carr S. Atopic dermatitis. Allergy, Asthma Clin Immunol [Internet]. 2018 Sep 12;14(S2):52. Available from. [CrossRef]
  3. Özcan, C. Atopic march in children with early-onset atopic dermatitis: A retrospective study. Rev Fr Allergol [Internet]. 2022 Dec;62(8):695–9. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877032022003499.
  4. Chan C, Law B, Liu Y-H, Ambrocio A, Au N, Jiang M, et al. The Association between Maternal Stress and Childhood Eczema: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2018 Feb 25;15(3):395. Available from: http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/3/395.
  5. Ali F, Vyas J, Finlay A. Counting the Burden: Atopic Dermatitis and Health-related Quality of Life. Acta Derm Venereol [Internet]. 2020;100(12):adv00161. Available from: https://medicaljournalssweden.se/actadv/article/view/1692.
  6. Sendrasoa FA, Razafimaharo TI, Ramarozatovo LS, Rapelanoro Rabenja F. Quality of life in children with atopic dermatitis seen in the department of dermatology at the university hospital, Antananarivo Madagascar. JAAD Int [Internet]. 2023 Mar;10:57–8. Available from. [CrossRef]
  7. Gochnauer H, Valdes-Rodriguez R, Cardwell L, Anolik RB. The Psychosocial Impact of Atopic Dermatitis. In: Fortson E, Feldman S, Strowd L, editors. Advances in experimental medicine and biology [Internet]. Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2017. p. 57–69. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-64804-0_6.
  8. Serra-Baldrich E, de Frutos JO, Jáuregui I, Armario-Hita JC, Silvestre JF, Herraez L, et al. Changing perspectives in atopic dermatitis. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) [Internet]. 2018 Jul;46(4):397–412. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301054617301222.
  9. Nedoszytko B, Reszka E, Gutowska-Owsiak D, Trzeciak M, Lange M, Jarczak J, et al. Genetic and Epigenetic Aspects of Atopic Dermatitis. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2020 Sep 4;21(18):6484. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/18/6484.
  10. Pelucchi C, Galeone C, Bach J-F, La Vecchia C, Chatenoud L. Pet exposure and risk of atopic dermatitis at the pediatric age: A meta-analysis of birth cohort studies. J Allergy Clin Immunol [Internet]. 2013 Sep;132(3):616-622.e7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091674913006003.
  11. Park SK, Kim JS, Seo H-M. Exposure to air pollution and incidence of atopic dermatitis in the general population: A national population-based retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol [Internet]. 2022 Dec;87(6):1321–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0190962221020661.
  12. Ibekwe PU, Ukonu BA. Impact of Weather Conditions on Atopic Dermatitis Prevalence in Abuja, Nigeria. J Natl Med Assoc [Internet]. 2019 Feb;111(1):88–93. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0027968418300336.
  13. Bonamonte D, Filoni A, Vestita M, Romita P, Foti C, Angelini G. The Role of the Environmental Risk Factors in the Pathogenesis and Clinical Outcome of Atopic Dermatitis. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2019 Apr 21;2019:1–11. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2019/2450605/.
  14. Reljić V, Gazibara T, Nikolić M, Zarić M, Maksimović N. Parental knowledge, attitude, and behavior toward children with atopic dermatitis. Int J Dermatol [Internet]. 2017 Mar;56(3):314–23. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijd.13529.
  15. Narla S, Silverberg JI. The Role of Environmental Exposures in Atopic Dermatitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep [Internet]. 2020 Dec 12;20(12):74. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11882-020-00971-z.
  16. Thomsen SF, Ulrik CS, Kyvik KO, Hjelmborg J v B, Skadhauge LR, Steffensen I, et al. Importance of genetic factors in the etiology of atopic dermatitis: A twin study. Allergy Asthma Proc [Internet]. 2007 Sep 1;28(5):535–9. Available from: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/10.2500/aap2007.28.3041.
  17. Carson, CG. Risk factors for developing atopic dermatitis. Dan Med J [Internet]. 2013 Jul;60(7):B4687. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23809981.
  18. Walker S, Wing A. Allergies in Children. Pediatr Patient Educ [Internet]. 2021 Jan 1;20(1):24–6. Available from: https://publications.aap.org/patiented/article/doi/10.1542/peo_document004/79914.
  19. Thorsteinsdottir S, Stokholm J, Thyssen JP, Nørgaard S, Thorsen J, Chawes BL, et al. Genetic, Clinical, and Environmental Factors Associated With Persistent Atopic Dermatitis in Childhood. JAMA Dermatology [Internet]. 2019 Jan 1;155(1):50. Available from: http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4061.
  20. Grillo M, Gassner L, Marshman G, Dunn S, Hudson P. Pediatric Atopic Eczema: The Impact of an Educational Intervention. Pediatr Dermatol [Internet]. 2006 Sep;23(5):428–36. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1525-1470.2006.00277.x.
  21. Myers EM, Perche PO, Jorizzo JL, Feldman SR. Reducing costs in atopic dermatitis. Dermatol Ther [Internet]. 2022 Nov 9;35(11):1–8. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dth.15849.
  22. Puddicombe OT, Odusote OA, Lesi FEA, Ayanlowo AO. Impact of atopic dermatitis on the quality of life of Nigerian children: A hospital-based cross-sectional study. South African J Child Heal [Internet]. 2018 Dec 14;12(4):137. Available from: http://www.sajch.org.za/index.php/sajch/article/view/1463.
  23. Nnoruka, EN. Current epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in south-eastern Nigeria. Int J Dermatol [Internet]. 2004 Oct;43(10):739–44. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02360.x.
  24. Altraide D, George I, Frank-Briggs A. Prevalence of Skin Diseases in Nigerian Children: - (The University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital) Experience. Niger J Med [Internet]. 2008 Nov 11;17(4):417–9. Available from: http://www.ajol.info/index.php/njm/article/view/37424. 3742.
  25. Wey GD, Adefemi SA, Amao EA. Prevalence and Pattern of Atopic Dermatitis among Children Aged 6 Months to 14 Years seen in General Out-Patient Clinic of Federal Medical Centre, Bida. West Afr J Med [Internet]. 2020;37(2):124–30. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150630.
  26. Zhang K, Batterman S. Air pollution and health risks due to vehicle traffic. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2013 Apr;450–451:307–16. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969713001290.
  27. Woo YR, Park S-Y, Choi K, Hong ES, Kim S, Kim HS. Air Pollution and Atopic Dermatitis (AD): The Impact of Particulate Matter (PM10) on an AD Mouse-Model. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2020 Aug 24;21(17):1–22. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32846909.
  28. Ahn, K. The role of air pollutants in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol [Internet]. 2014 Nov;134(5):993–9. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091674914013578.
  29. Montealegre F, Villa J, Vargas W, Hart B, Bayona M. Risk factors for atopic dermatitis in southern Puerto Rico. P R Health Sci J [Internet]. 2007 Jun;26(2):109–18. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17722423.
  30. Werner S, Buser K, Kapp A, Werfel T. The incidence of atopic dermatitis in school entrants is associated with individual life-style factors but not with local environmental factors in Hannover, Germany. Br J Dermatol [Internet]. 2002 Jul;147(1):95–104. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/bjd/article/147/1/95/6634974.
  31. Kim JP, Chao LX, Simpson EL, Silverberg JI. Persistence of atopic dermatitis (AD): A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol [Internet]. 2016 Oct;75(4):681-687.e11. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0190962216303097.
  32. Correale CE, Marks JG. Contact dermatitis in a woodworker. Am J Contact Dermat [Internet]. 2002;13(1):42–4. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046199X02608267.
  33. Corazza M, Zauli S, Pagnoni A, Virgili A. Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Metals in Blackboard Chalk: A Case Report. Acta Derm Venereol [Internet]. 2012;92(4):436–7. Available from: https://medicaljournalssweden.se/actadv/article/view/8903.
  34. Torfi Y, Bitarafan N, Rajabi M. Impact of socioeconomic and environmental factors on atopic eczema and allergic rhinitis: a cross sectional study. EXCLI J [Internet]. 2015;14:1040–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27004049.
  35. Skypala IJ, Bartra J, Ebo DG, Antje Faber M, Fernández-Rivas M, Gomez F, et al. The diagnosis and management of allergic reactions in patients sensitized to non-specific lipid transfer proteins. Allergy [Internet]. 2021 Aug 27;76(8):2433–46. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/all.14797.
  36. Cudowska B, Marcinkiewicz S, Kaczmarski M. Sensitization to cereal allergens in children with atopic dermatitis. Postep Dermatologii i Alergol [Internet]. 2011;28(3):181–6. Available from: https://www.termedia.pl/Original-paper-Sensitization-to-cereal-allergens-in-children-with-atopic-dermatitis,7,16917,1,1.html.
Figure 1. Shows the percentage of cases and control in the study.
Figure 1. Shows the percentage of cases and control in the study.
Preprints 70908 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants.
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants.
Variable Total
N(%)
Cases
N(%)
Control
N(%)
p-value
Age
6-8 Years 131 (38%) 32 (24%) 99 (76%) 0.773
9-11 Years 116 (33%) 31 (27%) 85 (73%)
12-14 Years 102 (29%) 23 (23%) 79 (77%)
Gender
Male 189 (54%) 42 (22%) 147 (78%) 0.254
Female 160 (46%) 44 (28%) 116 (72%)
Maternal educational status
No education 57 (16%) 14 (25%) 43 (75%) 0.172
Primary level 77 (22%) 19 (25%) 58 (75%)
Secondary 78 (22%) 13 (17%) 65 (83%)
Tertiary 66 (19%) 23 (35%) 43 (65%)
Post-Tertiary 71 (20%) 17 (24%) 54 (76%)
Paternal educational status
No education 56 (16%) 15 (27%) 41 (73%) 0.169
Primary level 63 (18%) 9 (14%) 54 (86%)
Secondary 83 (24%) 18 (22%) 65 (78%)
Tertiary 72 (21%) 21 (29%) 51 (71%)
Post-Tertiary 75 (22%) 23 (31%) 52 (69%)
Maternal employment status
Employed 115 (33%) 31 (27%) 84 (73%) 0.235
Self-employed 123 (35%) 37 (30%) 86 (70%)
Not employed 111 (32%) 18 (16%) 93 (84%)
Paternal employment status
Employed 122 (35%) 32 (26%) 90 (74%) 0.235
Self-employed 104 (30%) 30 (29%) 74 (71%)
Not employed 123 (35%) 24 (19%) 99 (81%)
Mother’s monthly income
<10,000 90 (26%) 28 (31%) 62 (69%) 0.048*
10,000-50,000 84 (24%) 25 (30%) 59 (70%)
>50,000-100,000 93 (27%) 14 (15%) 79 (85%)
>100,000 82 (24%) 19 (23%) 63 (77%)
Father’s monthly income
<10,000 88 (25%) 17 (19%) 71 (81%) 0.485
10,000-50,000 83 (24%) 23 (28%) 60 (72%)
>50,000-100,000 77 (22%) 22 (29%) 55 (71%)
>100,000 101 (29%) 24 (24%) 77 (76%)
Position of child in the family
First 101 (29%) 27 (27%) 74 (73%) 0.837
Intermediate 124 (36%) 30 (24%) 94 (76%)
Last 124 (36%) 29 (23%) 95 (77%)
* Statically significance at 0.050.
Table 2. School Related Risk Factors.
Table 2. School Related Risk Factors.
Variable Total
N(%)
Cases
N(%)
Control
N(%)
p-value
School grass
Yes 152 (44%) 40 (26%) 112 (74%) 0.524
No 197 (56%) 46 (23%) 151 (77%)
Surrounding bushes
Yes 175 (50%) 41 (23%) 134 (77%) 0.598
No 174 (50%) 45 (26%) 129 (74%)
Stagnant water
Yes 166 (48%) 35 (21%) 131 (79%) 0.142
No 183 (52%) 51 (28%) 132 (72%)
Rubber toys
Yes 194 (56%) 51 (26%) 143 (74%) 0.424
No 155 (44%) 35 (23%) 120 (77%)
Wooden chairs
Yes 188 (54%) 52 (28%) 136 (72%) 0.157
No 161 (46%) 34 (21%) 127 (79%)
Chalkboard
Yes 180 (52%) 48 (27%) 132 (73%) 0.365
No 169 (48%) 38 (23%) 131 (77%)
Table 3. Multivariate logistics analysis between atopic dermatitis and risk factors.
Table 3. Multivariate logistics analysis between atopic dermatitis and risk factors.
Risk Factor Crude Odds Ratios P-Value 95% Confidence Intervals Adjusted Odds Ratios P-Value 95% Confidence Intervals
Lower Higher Lower Higher
Weekly fruit consumption
Less than 1 Reference
1-3 1.71 0.11 0.88 3.32 1.64 0.22 0.74 3.66
4-6 1.92 0.06 0.98 3.75 2.60 0.02* 1.14 5.91
>6 1.91 0.06 0.97 3.78 2.05 0.07 0.94 4.48
Weekly cereal consumption
Less than 1 Reference
1-3 0.53 0.06 2.73 1.03 0.45 0.04* 0.20 0.99
4-6 0.78 0.51 0.38 1.62 0.77 0.56 0.31 1.88
>6 1.14 0.72 0.56 2.30 1.26 0.58 0.55 2.88
Weekly potatoes consumption
Less than 1 Reference
1-3 1.27 0.45 0.68 2.38 1.23 0.59 0.58 2.59
4-6 3.62 <0.001 1.69 7.78 4.49 <0.001* 1.88 10.73
>6 1.94 0.06 0.98 3.86 1.96 0.11 0.86 4.46
* Statistically significant (0.005).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated