Preprint
Article

Discovering Doily in PG(2,5)

Altmetrics

Downloads

117

Views

35

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

17 April 2023

Posted:

17 April 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
W. L. Edge proved that the internal points of a conic in PG(2,5), together with the collinear triples on the non-secant lines, form the Desargues configuration. M. Saniga showed an intimate connection between Desargues configurations and the generalized quadrangles of order two, GQ(2,2), whose representation has been dubbed “the doily” by Stan Payne in 1973. In this paper we prove that the external points of a conic in PG(2,5), together with the collinear and non-collinear triples on the non-tangent lines, form the generalized quadrangle of order two.
Keywords: 
Subject: Computer Science and Mathematics  -   Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics

1. Introduction and Motivation

W. L. Edge [2] proved that the internal points of a conic in PG(2,5) together with the non-secant lines form a Desargues configuration. M. Saniga [7] showed an intimate connection between Desargues configurations and the generalized quadrangle of order two, GD(2,2). The two results motivate the writing of this note. By using the Singer representation of PG(2,5), we provide a short proof of W. L. Edge result and, believing it is novel, we prove that the external points of a conic of PG(2,5) define the generalized quadrangle of order two, GD(2,2). The reason for deciding to conduct a detailed investigation of this special case is the charm of small projective planes, cf. [1,3,5,6,9,10].

2. The Singer Representation of PG(2,5)

Let ω be a primitive element of F 5 3 over F5 and let f x = a 0 a 1 x a 2 x 2 + x 3 be its minimal polynomial over F5. The companion matrix C f of f is given by
C f = 0 1 0 0 0 1 a 0 a 1 a 2
and it induces a Singer cycle γ of PG(2,5), cf. [8]. Let’s us consider the minimal polynomial f(x)=4+4x+x3 over F5. The companion matrix C f of f
C f = 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0
gives the 31 points of this plane as follows, cf. [4]. If the first point is ω 0 = x 0 , x 1 , x 2 = 1 0 0 , we get
ω 1 = ω 0 T =   1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 = 0 1 0 ;
ω 2 = ω 0 T 2 = ω 1 T   0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 = 0 0 1 ;
ω 3 = ω 0 T 3 = ω 2 T   0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 = 1 1 0 ;
ω0=(1,0,0)
ω1=(0,1,0) ω2=(0,0,1) ω3=(1,1,0) ω4=(0,1,1) ω5=(1,1,4) ω6=(1,2,1)
ω7=(1,0,3) ω8=(1,4,0) ω9=(0,1,4) ω10=(1,1,1) ω11=(1,0,4) ω12=(1,2,0)
ω13=(0,1,2) ω14=(1,1,2) ω15=(1,3,2) ω16=(1,3,1) ω17=(1,0,2) ω18=(1,3,0)
ω19=(0,1,3) ω20=(1,1,3) ω21=(1,4,3) ω22=(1,4,2) ω23=(1,3,3) ω24=(1,4,4)
ω25=(1,2,4) ω26=(1,2,2) ω27=(1,3,4) ω28=(1,2,3) ω29=(1,4,1) ω30=(1,0,1)
Let us denote the points represented by ω i simply by i. So, the Singer group is isomorphic to the additive group Z 31 , the integers modulo 31. Now select any line: for example, we choose the line x1=x2, which contains the points: l0={0,4,10,23,24,26}. The remaining lines of the plane are found by adding 1 to each point of the preceding line beginning with l0 and using addition modulo 31. For convenience, we represent the projective plane of order 5 as a set of orthogonal arrays of the affine plane of order 5 with the intersection point of the member of each parallel class indicated to the right of the row array and at the bottom of the column array. We do this by using the Singer difference set defining PG(2,5) as the line at infinity, designated by l. Thus, let l={0,4,10,23,24,26}. The remaining lines of the plane are found by adding 1 to each point of the preceding line beginning with l as l0 and using addition modulo 31. The pencil of lines on the point 4 is then intersected by the pencil of lines on the point 0 to form the first array. Thus, each row (column) plus its point at infinity represents a line of the plane. Now, let us take into account the Singer representation
Preprints 71165 i001
Preprints 71165 i002
Moreover, by the Singer representation, since all conics in PG(2,5) are projectively equivalent, see [4], let us consider the conic C=−l={−0,−4,−10,−23,−24,−26}={0,5,7,8,21,27},
Preprints 71165 i003
by taking into account the points not on C and not on the tangent lines, we get the 10−set I of the internal points of the conic I={1,12,13,17,19,22,25,28,29,30}. Now, taking into account the triples on the external lines
Preprints 71165 i004
Preprints 71165 i005
We get {{1,13,19},{1,17,22},{1,29,30},{12,13,30},{12,19,29},{12,25,28},{13,22,28},{17,19,28}, {17,25,29},{22,25,30}}. Let us now consider the point-line incidence geometry (I,T) where the point-set I is the 10−set of the internal points of the conic I={1,12,13,17,19,22,25,28,29,30}, and the line-set T is the union of the triples of collinear points on the external lines:
T={{1,13,19},{1,17,22},{1,29,30},{12,13,30},{12,19,29},{12,25,28},{13,22,28},{17,19,28}, {17,25,29},{22,25,30}}
Preprints 71165 i006
A brief inspection of the above Figure confirms that the geometry (I,T) is the Desargues configuration, as W. L. Edge proved in [2].
Now, by taking into account the points non on C, but on the tangent lines,
Preprints 71165 i007
Preprints 71165 i008
We get the 15−set of external points of the conic E={2,3,4,6,9,10,11,14,15,16,18,20,23,24,26}, cf. [4]. Now, taking into account the triples on the external lines and the triples of non-collinear points of the triangles of the 2-lines:
Preprints 71165 i009
We get the sets T1={{2,4,9},{2,6,26},{3,9,23},{3,16,24},{4,18,20},{6,10,16},{10,11,18}, {11,14,23},{14,15,26},{15,20,24}} and T2={{2,11,24},{3,18,26},{4,14,16},{6,20,23},{9,10,15}}
Preprints 71165 i010
Let us now construct the point-line incidence geometry (E,L) where the point-set E is the 15−set of the external points of the conic, and the line-set L=T1T2
A brief inspection of the under Figure confirms that this geometry is isomorphic to GD(2,2).
Preprints 71165 i011

3. Conclusion

This note confirms the intimate connection between Desargues configurations and the generalized quadrangles of order two.

References

  1. Beutelspacher, A., A defense of the honour of an unjustly neglected little geometry or a combinatorial approach to the projective plane of order five. J. Geom. 30, 182-195 (1987). [CrossRef]
  2. Edge, W. L., 31-point Geometry, Math. Gaz. 39 (1955), 113-121.
  3. Havlicek, H., Lenz, H. Another simple proof for the existence of the small Witt design. Elem. Math. 56 89-94 (2001). [CrossRef]
  4. Hirschfeld, J. W. P., Projective geometries over finite fields, Clarendon Press, Oxford, Second Edition, 1998.
  5. Innamorati, S., Tondini, D., The yin-yang structure of the affine plane of order four, Ars Combin. 110 (2013), 193-197.
  6. Mancini, C., Zannetti, M., 21=9+12: PG(2,4)=AG(2,3)+DAG(2,3), Ars Combin. 135 (2017), 103-108.
  7. Saniga, M., Geometric Hyperplanes: Desargues Encodes Doily, HAL, Volume 2010, (2010) n. 0. http://gdmltest.u-ga.fr/item/hal-00550447/.
  8. Singer, J., A theorem in finite projective geometry and some applications to number theory, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 43 (1938), 377-385.
  9. Tondini, D., An excursion in finite geometry, J. Interdiscip. Math. 22 (8) (2019), 1589-1595. [CrossRef]
  10. Tondini, D., The type of a point and a characterization of the set of external points of a conic in PG(2,q), q odd, J. Discrete Math. Sci. Cryptogr. 23 (5) (2020), 1077-1083. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated