1. Introduction
Chilean strawberry (Fragaria chiloensis) is a native wild species from Chile that produces a fruit which is highly appreciated for its good organoleptic qualities such as aroma and taste, its exotic white color and remarkable biotic stress tolerance [1-3]. Albeit those extraordinary properties, the fruit softens very fast and intensively during ripening that reduces its postharvest shelf-life.
The Chilean strawberry fruit ripens with a non-climacteric pattern. Ripening is a complex process, during which a fruit develops into a fleshy, colorful and tasty fruit. For these biochemical and physiological changes a series of metabolic pathways are switched on, such as degradation of chlorophyll and starch, biosynthesis of pigments and volatile compounds, accumulation of sugars and organic acids [
4]. It is important to highlight that the perfect coordination of those metabolic pathways is needed to develop a fruit of good quality. In climacteric fruits most of those metabolic pathways are regulated and coordinated by the hormone ethylene, however in non-climacteric fruit ethylene does not have the same effect [
5]. Several hormones have been analyzed as master ripening regulators in non-climacteric fruit, including abscisic acid (ABA) and auxins.
Hormones play essential roles in the control and coordination of several physiological events, including fruit ripening. In strawberry, hormonal changes include the rise of ABA levels along the ripening development, and this increment coincides with the drop of auxins [
6]. Several reports have shown that ABA promotes the ripening of strawberry fruit. It has been documented in different species of
Fragaria that the treatment of turning or ripe strawberry fruits with ABA promotes a full ripe phenotype [7-11]. Treatments of fruit with ABA at the green stage and still attached to the plant, also promotes ripening [
12]. On the other hand, auxins seem to delay ripening of non-climacteric fruit. This has been proven by the exogenous application of auxins that delays ripening development of strawberry fruit, and by the removal of the endogenous source of auxins (the achenes) that promotes the ripening of
F. x ananassa fruit [
13]. Recently, it has been shown in
F. vesca that even if auxins levels are relatively low and stable in advanced ripening fruit stages, the expression of genes related to auxin signal transduction and down-stream responses are reduced in receptacles as ABA increases [
14]. Therefore, although the ABA/auxins ratio has been proposed as the coordination of fruit development and ripening in strawberry fruit [
5,
9], new evidences suggest that ABA could be the master regulator hormone and a key controller of gene expression during strawberry ripening [
10,
11].
ABA is a sesquiterpenoid hormone synthesized through the carotenoid pathway, also known as the ‘indirect pathway’ [
15]. This pathway, widely reviewed by [
16,
17], initiates in plasmids with the conversion of zeaxanthin into trans-violaxanthin, a C40 precursor, by zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP); at this point the pathway diverges in two ways, leading to the conversion of 9′-cis-neoxanthin or 9′-cis-violaxanthin, which are then converted into xanthoxin (C15 intermediate) through an oxidative cleavage by the 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED); then an alcohol dehydrogenase at cytosol converts xanthoxin into abscisic aldehyde; finally the abscisic aldehyde is oxidized to ABA by an abscisic aldehyde oxidase (AAO). On the other hand, ABA catabolism is mediated by CYP707A, a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase that converts ABA into phaseic acid (PA) through a catalytic hydroxylation [
18]. The second form of catabolism is the conjugation of ABA by a UDP-glucosyltransferase (UGT) to form ABA-glucose ester (ABA-GE), which is an inactive form of ABA that is stored in vacuoles and the endoplasmic reticulum [
19,
20]. ABA-GE can be reversibly transformed into ABA by β-glucosidases and released from the endoplasmic reticulum and vacuole [
21]. Therefore, ABA levels in the fruit are controlled through the balance between its biosynthesis (
NCED) and its catabolism (
CYP707A) [
22].
ABA cellular responses are mediated by a group of soluble proteins named pyrabactin resistant (PYR) and PYR-like (PYL) receptors (reviewed by [
15]). The activation of these receptors by ABA induces the formation of a complex with the protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C), and in consequence PP2C releases SNF1-related kinases (SnRK). Then SnRK can phosphorylate targets such as transcription factors, ion channels, Raf-like MAPKKKs signaling pathway and other mediators of ABA response (reviewed by [
23]). It has been described that PYLs such as AtPYL4-6 and AtPYL8-10 act as monomers and have higher ABA binding affinity, interacting with PP2Cs in an ABA-enhanced manner; meanwhile PYLs such as AtPYR1 and AtPYL1-2 act as dimers and have lower ABA binding affinity, interacting with PP2Cs in an ABA-dependent manner [
24].
ABA homeostasis and ABA perception have been mainly investigated in
F. x ananassa and
F. vesca. The key role of NCED on ABA biosynthesis in strawberry fruit was demonstrated on transgenic
FaNCED1 RNAi fruit [
12] that provides transgenic fruit with reduced ABA levels compared to control fruit. In addition, the fruit remains uncolored, however the exogenous application of ABA recovered the normal red color of the fruit. During development of strawberry fruit, the expression of
FaNCED1 and
FaNCED2 rises as the levels of ABA levels increases, meanwhile the expression of
FaCYP707A1 increases from green to white fruit, then decreases until the final stages of ripening [
25]. On the other hand, nine members of the
FaPYR/PYL gene family have been identified in
F. x ananassa, and reports indicate that
FaPYL2 may play a major role in ripening [
26]. In
F. vesca ABA homoeostasis involves the regulation of ABA catabolism and biosynthesis by feedback and feedforward loops which are linked to the repression of
CYP707A expression and promotion of
NCED expression at the onset of ripening [
27]. In addition, the transient silencing of
FveCYP707A4a, that increases the expression of
FveNCED5 and rises the levels of ABA, induces the expression of genes related to fruit softening (
FvePL) [
27].
FvePYL2 transcripts reached a relatively high expression level at the red fruit stage, while other
FvePYLs have diversified expression patterns [
14].
In
F. chiloensis several evidences confirm that ABA is involved in its ripening as it can induces the transcriptional changes required for fruit softening and color development [5,10,11,28-30]. As ABA seems to have a key participation in ripening stimulation of
F. chiloensis fruit, the molecular network involved in ABA metabolism in ripening fruit was analyzed. Currently, there are some evidences of the participation of
NCEDs on
F. chiloensis fruit [
11], but none for
PYR/PYLs. Therefore, the expression level of genes involved in ABA biosynthesis and ABA perception were quantified in
F. chiloensis fruit as a way to provide further molecular evidences of the participation of ABA on the ripening development of this fruit. As several
NCEDs and
PYR/PYLs family members have been identified in fruit species but only few of them seems to participate during fruit ripening, this work pretends to identify those members involved in the ripening of this non-climacteric fruit.
3. Discussion
Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases (CCDs) are a family of enzymes that catalyzes the cleavage of carotenoids into smaller apocarotenoids, molecules with relevant properties including pigments, flavor and aroma compounds, and plant growth regulators such as vitamin A, ABA and strigolactone [
35,
36]. The CCD gene family comprises CCD and NCED subfamilies. Importantly, NCED can catalyze the cleavage of 11, 12 double bond of violaxanthin (C40) or neoxanthin (C40) to form xanthoxin (C15), the precursor of ABA. The reaction carried out by NCED is considered the rate-limiting step in ABA biosynthesis.
In
Fragaria chiloensis two
NCEDs and two
CCDs were identified within the transcriptome prepared from fruit samples [
37]. In general, the number of
CCD genes identified in the genome of different fruit species is reduced compared to the number described in non-fruit species (30 in oilseed rape, 19 in tobacco) [
35]. In the genome of watermelon (
Cucumis lanatus), melon (
C. melo) and cucumber (
C. sativus) a recent report indicated the existence of 10, 9 and 9
NCED/CCD protein sequences, respectively [
35]. In all these cucurbitaceae species there are 4
NCED sequences and 5 or 6
CCDs. In litchi (
Litchi chinensis), 15
LcCCO genes were identified in its genome, 3
NCEDs and 12
CCDs [
36]. In tomato, 7
CCD sequences have been described within its genome [
38]. In comparison, in Arabidopsis a total of 9 members of the
CCD family have been reported, divided into 4
CCDs and 5
NCEDs [
39]. Therefore, the number of
CCD members in
F. chiloensis is reduced compared to other fruit species, but as the search has been restricted to a fruit transcriptome there may be other sequences waiting to be discovered.
Several studies suggested that different
CCD subfamilies exhibit different roles within the plant kingdom. For example,
CCD1 plays important roles in aroma and flavor of horticultural products as catalyzes the formation of α-ionone, β-ionone and geranylacetone [
40,
41].
CCD4 contributes to color formation in flower petals and fruit peel, and also aroma production [42-48].
CCD7 and
CCD8 seem to participate in the biosynthesis of the hormone strigolactone, which could control shoot branching, reproductive development and plant responses to drought and salt stress [49-52]. Finally,
NCED subfamily is involved in ABA biosynthesis, and closely involved in fruit development and ripening. In commercial strawberry
FaNCED1 has been demonstrated to be crucial for ABA biosynthesis, as RNAi constructs promoted a dramatic reduction in ABA content that reduced development of red color [
12], and the phenotype was reverted by the application of exogenous ABA. Similarly in grape [
53], sweet cherry [
54] and litchi fruit [
55] ABA accelerated the accumulation of anthocyanins by increasing the expression of
NCED.
In litchi
LcCCD4s,
LcCCD1,
LcNCED1 and
LcNCED2 might participate in postharvest storage of the fruit and peel coloration [
36]. The expression of
LcNCED1 in fruits was consistent with the accumulation of ABA during the ripening of litchi [
56]. In peach and grape fruits
PpNCED1 and
VvNCED1 transcripts increase at early stages of ripening, which initiates ABA biosynthesis and ABA accumulation [
57]. In
Citrus clementina, the expression of
CcNCED5 increases at color break and remains high at the ripe stage in parallel to ABA levels, suggesting a role in the ripening of mandarin fruit [
58].
In melon the expression of
CmCCD1 was upregulated during development of the fruit and seems to participate in aroma formation [
59]. In addition,
CmCCD1 was upregulated by ABA, and other stress conditions such as drought and salt [
35]. The expression of
CmNCED3 was upregulated in melon leaves under a series of abiotic stress (salt, cold, drought), indicating that plays an important role in stress [
35]. Finally,
CmNCED5s are highly expressed in flowers and play crucial roles in flower growth and development [
35].
From the FcNCED/CCD sequences identified in F. chiloensis, all of them were detected in fruit tissues, albeit with different profiles. This is not surprising as the sequences were obtained from a fruit transcriptome. Only FcNCED1 and FcCCD1 were detected in vegetative tissues: FcNCED1 in roots and runners, and FcCCD1 mostly in flowers.
The phylogenetic analysis grouped
FcNCED1 in the same branch with
FaNCED1 and
FvNCED1. Our data indicates that the expression level of
FcNCED1 increases as the ripening of the fruit is taking place. This also correlates with the increment in ABA observed in the fruit during development. Interestingly this gene is mainly expressed in fruit tissues, with low expression level in roots. All these evidences indicates that
FcNCED1 is the orthologous of
FaNCED1, a gene which has been demonstrated to be involved in ABA biosynthesis during ripening of
F. x ananassa fruit whose repression by RNAi avoided the biosynthesis of ABA [
12]. Importantly, the expression of
FcNCED1 has been reported to be induced in fruit by ABA treatment [
11].
The alignment of deduced amino acid sequences indicated that FcNCEDs and FcCCDs share important domains related to activity. The amino acid residues identified as part of cleavage domains are mostly conserved. Two amino acids seems to discriminate between NCED and CCD proteins: L95 and V403 from ZmVP14. The corresponding residues in FcNCED3 and FcCCD1 are in agreement with hypothetic differentiation for activity, however in the case of FcNCED1 and FcCCD4 the residue at location 95 is not the expected. FcNCED1 contains a Phe instead of the expected Leu, and FcCCD4 contains a Leu instead of Trp. Nevertheless, the changes in amino acids do not interfere with their character, as Phe, Leu and Trp are nonpolar hydrophobic residues. Interestingly, the same Phe identified in FcNCED1 exists in FvNCED1 and AtNCED3, and in the case of FcCCD4 the Leu in position 95 also exists in FvCCD4, RrCCD4, PaCCD4 and MdCCD4. Therefore the discrimination between these two activities requires further studies.
The search for ABA receptor sequences within the
F. chiloensis fruit transcriptome provided the identification of one
PYR and five
PYLs sequences. The translated amino acid sequences displayed the connecting loops required for the interaction with ABA, and most of the residues involved in ABA and PP2C binding. The phylogenetic analysis grouped them into three subfamilies that correlates well with the number of subfamilies reported in many species. As in Arabidopsis, subfamily II includes FcPYL4 in one clade and FcPYL12 in another. Interestingly this second clade is missing in monocot species, and also in some dicots such as tomato and citrus [
32], but it is present in
F. chiloensis, a Rosaceae species. The three PYR/PYL families have arisen during evolution; the latest to emerge is subfamily III which is present only in angiosperms [
40]. Subfamilies I and II are composed of monomeric receptors, with high basal activity, and require only a low level of ABA to induce PP2C inhibition, while subfamily III receptors are dimeric in solution and have low basal activity [
60].
All FcPYR/PYLs were expressed in F. chiloensis fruit tissues, and all of them except for FcPYR1 were expressed in vegetative tissues. FcPYL8 was the most expressed gene in vegetative tissues. Different expression profiles were obtained for FcPYR/PYLs in ripening fruit. Of interest is the expression of FcPYL2 and FcPYL4 along the ripening progress, as their expression followed the increment in ABA level reported in the fruit, suggesting their participation in ABA perception. Nevertheless, FcPYL2 does not contain CL2 which is crucial for ABA interaction.
The expression of PYR/PYL gene family has been analyzed during ripening in different fruits species. In cucumber,
CsPYL2 was expressed at high level during fruit ripening, with a peak of expression between turning and ripe stages, coincident with the highest level of ABA content in the fruit, suggesting its participation in ABA perception during fruit ripening [
61]. In Chinese white pear, from the eleven
PbrPYL genes identified in its genome, seven of them, which were distributed within the three subfamilies, were expressed in ripe fruit (
PbrPYL1/4/5/6/7/8/9) [
61]. In grapes (
Vitis vinifera), from the eight PYL genes identified in the genome, two of them have a particular expression profile of interest for fruit ripening, as
VvPYL1 and
VvPYL8 significantly increased from fruit set till the ripening stage [
62]. Those two genes can be classified in subfamily I.
In citrus genome, 11
PYL sequences have been identified [
32]. Expression analysis in fruit performed in only 6
CsPYLs shown that
CsPYL9 belonging to subfamily I was the most expressed during sweet orange development and ripening [
63].
In tomato, a climacteric fruit, two of the fourteen
SlPYL genes identified displayed an expression peak at breaker stages, when ripening is starting, and reported as candidates to regulate fruit ripening [
64]. These two genes belong to subfamilies I and II according to our nomenclature. A recent study, confirm that among the 14
SlPYLs, the expression level of
SlPYL1 was the highest, and the expression patterns of
SlPYL1,
SlPYL4, and
SlPYL9 agreed with the ABA accumulation in fruit during development [
65]. Interestingly,
SlPYL9 which is closest to monomeric
AtPYL4 and therefore belongs to subfamily II, seems to have a specific role in fruit development and ripening. The overexpression of
SlPYL9 accelerated the ripening of the fruit, meanwhile RNAi lines showed a delay in ripening [
65].
It has been proposed that PYR/PYL genes grouped into the same subfamily may perform similar functions, however as described, members of the three subfamilies have been identified with a role during ripening in several fruit species (F. chiloensis, tomato, Chinese pear, grapes and citrus), and therefore, this statement is not fully true in the case of fruit ripening.
In conclusion, FcNCED1 is expressed with an increasing pattern during ripening of F. chiloensis fruit which correlates with the ABA levels reported for the fruit. In addition, the gene also increments its expression in response to ABA. On the other hand, FcPYL4 from subfamily II displays an expression profile which may explain ABA perception. These two genes, FcNCED1 and FcPYL4, might be in charge of ABA biosynthesis and ABA perception during the ripening of F. chiloensis fruit.
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic analysis of FcNCEDs and FcCCDs proteins. Different
F. chiloensis sequences (4) were aligned with 21 sequences from
F. x ananassa (3),
M. domestica (4),
R. chinensis (1),
R. rugosa (2),
P. avium (1),
F. vesca (5) and
A. thaliana (5). The phylogenic tree was built using the Neighbor-Joining method with bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 5000 replicates. The list of protein sequences employed in the analysis, including Genbank accession numbers, is shown in
Table S1.
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic analysis of FcNCEDs and FcCCDs proteins. Different
F. chiloensis sequences (4) were aligned with 21 sequences from
F. x ananassa (3),
M. domestica (4),
R. chinensis (1),
R. rugosa (2),
P. avium (1),
F. vesca (5) and
A. thaliana (5). The phylogenic tree was built using the Neighbor-Joining method with bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 5000 replicates. The list of protein sequences employed in the analysis, including Genbank accession numbers, is shown in
Table S1.
Figure 2.
Alignment of deduced full-length amino acid sequences of FcNCED/CCD family. Amino acid sequences of FcNCED/CCDs and ZmVP14, an NCED-like protein (PDB code: 3NPE), were aligned using ESPript: gaps are indicated by dots, letters with red background are identical amino acids, and red letters are similar amino acids. The two cleavage sites (CV1-CV2) are indicated in boxes and correspond to two antiparallel α-helix regions. Red arrows indicate the binding site for 9-cis-violaxanthin at 9-cis bond and the near methylcyclohexane; light-blue arrows indicate binding site for Fe
2+; blue arrows indicate amino acids helding the histidines which binds Fe; green arrows indicate binding site for 9-cis-violaxanthin at isoprene chain; orange arrows indicate binding site for 9-cis-violaxanthin at methylcyclohexane; purple arrow indicates binding site for 9-cis-violaxanthin at carotenoid section between C9-C15; black arrows indicate amino acids which interact with cell membrane; asterisks indicate amino acids that differentiate NCED and CCD (information obtained from [
31]). Sequences were aligned using MAFFT version 7.
Figure 2.
Alignment of deduced full-length amino acid sequences of FcNCED/CCD family. Amino acid sequences of FcNCED/CCDs and ZmVP14, an NCED-like protein (PDB code: 3NPE), were aligned using ESPript: gaps are indicated by dots, letters with red background are identical amino acids, and red letters are similar amino acids. The two cleavage sites (CV1-CV2) are indicated in boxes and correspond to two antiparallel α-helix regions. Red arrows indicate the binding site for 9-cis-violaxanthin at 9-cis bond and the near methylcyclohexane; light-blue arrows indicate binding site for Fe
2+; blue arrows indicate amino acids helding the histidines which binds Fe; green arrows indicate binding site for 9-cis-violaxanthin at isoprene chain; orange arrows indicate binding site for 9-cis-violaxanthin at methylcyclohexane; purple arrow indicates binding site for 9-cis-violaxanthin at carotenoid section between C9-C15; black arrows indicate amino acids which interact with cell membrane; asterisks indicate amino acids that differentiate NCED and CCD (information obtained from [
31]). Sequences were aligned using MAFFT version 7.
Figure 3.
Phylogenetic analysis of
FcPYR and
FcPYLs proteins. Different
F. chiloensis sequences (6) were aligned with other 23 sequences from
F. x ananassa (1),
M. domestica (5),
R. chinensis (5),
P. persica (6) and
F. vesca (6). The phylogenic tree was built using the Neighbor-Joining method with bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 5000 replicates. The list of protein sequences employed in the analysis, including Genbank accession numbers, is shown in
Table S2.
Figure 3.
Phylogenetic analysis of
FcPYR and
FcPYLs proteins. Different
F. chiloensis sequences (6) were aligned with other 23 sequences from
F. x ananassa (1),
M. domestica (5),
R. chinensis (5),
P. persica (6) and
F. vesca (6). The phylogenic tree was built using the Neighbor-Joining method with bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 5000 replicates. The list of protein sequences employed in the analysis, including Genbank accession numbers, is shown in
Table S2.
Figure 4.
Alignment of deduced full-length amino acid sequences of FcPYR/PYL family
. Amino acid sequences of FcPYR/PYLs and AtPYL2 (PDB code: 3KAZ) were aligned using ESPript: gaps are indicated by dots, letters with red background are identical amino acids, and red letters are similar amino acids. The four connecting loops (CL1-CL4) are indicated in boxes and correspond to interaction domains with ABA. Red arrows indicate the binding site for carboxyl group of ABA, blue arrows indicate hydrogen bonds with the carboxyl group of ABA, green arrows indicate binding site for methyl group of ABA, yellow arrows indicate binding site for dimethyl group of ABA, asterisks indicate amino acids present in the hydrophobic pocket, and the orange arrow indicates the binding site for PP2C protein (information captured from [
33,
34]). Sequences were aligned using MAFFT version 7.
Figure 4.
Alignment of deduced full-length amino acid sequences of FcPYR/PYL family
. Amino acid sequences of FcPYR/PYLs and AtPYL2 (PDB code: 3KAZ) were aligned using ESPript: gaps are indicated by dots, letters with red background are identical amino acids, and red letters are similar amino acids. The four connecting loops (CL1-CL4) are indicated in boxes and correspond to interaction domains with ABA. Red arrows indicate the binding site for carboxyl group of ABA, blue arrows indicate hydrogen bonds with the carboxyl group of ABA, green arrows indicate binding site for methyl group of ABA, yellow arrows indicate binding site for dimethyl group of ABA, asterisks indicate amino acids present in the hydrophobic pocket, and the orange arrow indicates the binding site for PP2C protein (information captured from [
33,
34]). Sequences were aligned using MAFFT version 7.
Figure 5.
Relative expression levels of FcNCED/CCDs in several F. chiloensis vegetative tissues. Expression levels of FcNCED1 (A) and FcCCD1 (B) were determined by RT-qPCR. Values were first normalized against the expression data of FcDBP, and then calibrated against stem tissue in the case of FcNCED1 and root tissue in the case of FcCCD1, with a nominal value of 1. Each value corresponds to the mean ± SE of three independent RNA extractions and qPCR analysis using three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared to calibrated tissue (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, or ****p< 0.0001; One-way ANOVA with Dunnet correction post-hoc). .
Figure 5.
Relative expression levels of FcNCED/CCDs in several F. chiloensis vegetative tissues. Expression levels of FcNCED1 (A) and FcCCD1 (B) were determined by RT-qPCR. Values were first normalized against the expression data of FcDBP, and then calibrated against stem tissue in the case of FcNCED1 and root tissue in the case of FcCCD1, with a nominal value of 1. Each value corresponds to the mean ± SE of three independent RNA extractions and qPCR analysis using three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared to calibrated tissue (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, or ****p< 0.0001; One-way ANOVA with Dunnet correction post-hoc). .
Figure 6.
Relative expression levels of FcNCED/CCDs in F. chiloensis developing fruit. Expression levels were determined by RT-qPCR: (A) FcNCED1, (B) FcNCED3, (C) FcCCD1 and (D) FcCCD4. Values were first normalized against the expression data of FcDBP, and then calibrated against the expression of C1 stage with a nominal value of 1 or C3 in the case of FcCCD4. Each value corresponds to the mean ± SE of three independent RNA extractions and three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared to C1 stage (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001; One-way ANOVA with Dunnet correction post-hoc). .
Figure 6.
Relative expression levels of FcNCED/CCDs in F. chiloensis developing fruit. Expression levels were determined by RT-qPCR: (A) FcNCED1, (B) FcNCED3, (C) FcCCD1 and (D) FcCCD4. Values were first normalized against the expression data of FcDBP, and then calibrated against the expression of C1 stage with a nominal value of 1 or C3 in the case of FcCCD4. Each value corresponds to the mean ± SE of three independent RNA extractions and three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared to C1 stage (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001; One-way ANOVA with Dunnet correction post-hoc). .
Figure 7.
Heatmap analysis of FcNCED/CCD transcripts, clustered in based of their accumulation profile and tissue specificity. The columns of the heatmap represent genes and the rows correspond to samples. Each cell is colorized based on the expression level of a particular gene in a certain sample. The values used in the analysis correspond to the expression level of each FcNCED/CCD gene without calibration.
Figure 7.
Heatmap analysis of FcNCED/CCD transcripts, clustered in based of their accumulation profile and tissue specificity. The columns of the heatmap represent genes and the rows correspond to samples. Each cell is colorized based on the expression level of a particular gene in a certain sample. The values used in the analysis correspond to the expression level of each FcNCED/CCD gene without calibration.
Figure 8.
Relative expression levels of FcPYR/PYLs in several F. chiloensis vegetative tissues. Expression analyses were performed by RT-qPCR. Values were initially normalized against the expression data of FcDBP, and then calibrated against a selected tissue (stem in A and B; leaf in C and D; runner in E) with a nominal value of 1. Each value corresponds to the mean ± SE of three independent RNA extractions and three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared to calibration tissue (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001; One-way ANOVA with Dunnet correction post-hoc).
Figure 8.
Relative expression levels of FcPYR/PYLs in several F. chiloensis vegetative tissues. Expression analyses were performed by RT-qPCR. Values were initially normalized against the expression data of FcDBP, and then calibrated against a selected tissue (stem in A and B; leaf in C and D; runner in E) with a nominal value of 1. Each value corresponds to the mean ± SE of three independent RNA extractions and three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared to calibration tissue (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001; One-way ANOVA with Dunnet correction post-hoc).
Figure 9.
Heatmap analysis of FcPYR/PYL transcripts, clustered in based of their accumulation profile and tissue specificity. The columns of the heatmap represent genes and the rows correspond to samples. Each cell is colorized based on the expression level of each gene in a particular sample. The values used in the analysis correspond to expression values of FcPYR/PYLs without calibration.
Figure 9.
Heatmap analysis of FcPYR/PYL transcripts, clustered in based of their accumulation profile and tissue specificity. The columns of the heatmap represent genes and the rows correspond to samples. Each cell is colorized based on the expression level of each gene in a particular sample. The values used in the analysis correspond to expression values of FcPYR/PYLs without calibration.
Figure 10.
Relative expression levels of FcPYR/PYLs in F. chiloensis developing fruit. Expression analyses were performed by RT-qPCR. Values were first normalized against the expression data of FcDBP, and then calibrated against the expression of C1 stage with a nominal value of 1 or C2 in the case of FcPYR1. Each value corresponds to the mean ± SE of three independent RNA extractions and three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared to C1 stage (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, or ****p< 0.0001; One-way ANOVA with Dunnet correction post-hoc).
Figure 10.
Relative expression levels of FcPYR/PYLs in F. chiloensis developing fruit. Expression analyses were performed by RT-qPCR. Values were first normalized against the expression data of FcDBP, and then calibrated against the expression of C1 stage with a nominal value of 1 or C2 in the case of FcPYR1. Each value corresponds to the mean ± SE of three independent RNA extractions and three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared to C1 stage (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, or ****p< 0.0001; One-way ANOVA with Dunnet correction post-hoc).
Figure 11.
Pearson correlation analysis between ABA levels during fruit development, ABA biosynthesis genes and ABA receptor genes. Raw expression values of each gene and ABA level data from the four development and ripening stages of F. chiloensis fruit were analyzed in order to find correlations.
Figure 11.
Pearson correlation analysis between ABA levels during fruit development, ABA biosynthesis genes and ABA receptor genes. Raw expression values of each gene and ABA level data from the four development and ripening stages of F. chiloensis fruit were analyzed in order to find correlations.
Table 1.
Analysis of functional domains of deduced FcNCED/CCD amino acid sequences using PFAM database.
Table 1.
Analysis of functional domains of deduced FcNCED/CCD amino acid sequences using PFAM database.
Gene |
Transcript ID |
Domain Type |
Seq Length (aa) |
FcNCED1 |
comp919_c0_seq1 |
Retinal pigment epithelial membrane protein |
501 |
FcNCED3 |
comp27198_c0_seq1 |
Retinal pigment epithelial membrane protein |
392 |
FcCCD1 |
comp799_c0_seq1 |
Retinal pigment epithelial membrane protein |
568 |
FcCCD4 |
comp503_c0_seq1 |
Retinal pigment epithelial membrane protein |
581 |
Table 2.
Analysis of functional domains of deduced FcPYR/PYL amino acid sequences using PFAM database.
Table 2.
Analysis of functional domains of deduced FcPYR/PYL amino acid sequences using PFAM database.
Gene |
Transcript ID |
Domain Type |
Seq Length (aa) |
FcPYR1 |
comp13086_c0_seq1 |
Polyketide cyclase/dehydrase and lipid transport |
216 |
FcPYL2 |
comp7632_c0_seq1 |
ND |
93 |
FcPYL4 |
comp22550_c0_seq1 |
Polyketide cyclase/dehydrase and lipid transport |
218 |
FcPYL8 |
comp2447_c0_seq3 |
Polyketide cyclase/dehydrase and lipid transport |
189 |
FcPYL9 |
comp3997_c0_seq2 |
Polyketide cyclase/dehydrase and lipid transport |
121 |
FcPYL12 |
comp2932_c0_seq1 |
Polyketide cyclase/dehydrase and lipid transport |
167 |
Table 3.
Nucleotide sequence of the primers used in the qPCR analyses (Tm of 60 °C).
Table 3.
Nucleotide sequence of the primers used in the qPCR analyses (Tm of 60 °C).
Gene |
Sequence (5’ → 3’) |
Efficiency |
FcNCED1 |
Fw |
GATCTACCTTGGCGAAACCA |
90.0% |
|
Rv |
GAGGCGGATCATGTGAACTT |
|
FcNCED3 |
Fw |
ACGACTTCGCCATTACCG |
92.1% |
|
Rv |
AGCATCGCTCGATTCT |
|
FcCCD1 |
Fw |
GCCAAGCATATGACACTCCTC |
98.0% |
|
Rv |
TCCTCGTTAGAAGGCCTGAA |
|
FcCCD4 |
Fw |
CATTCCCGACCAAGATAGGA |
94.3% |
|
Rv |
GCCGTCCTTTGAGTAAACC |
|
FcPYL2 |
Fw |
GCCATGGTGGTCAACTGTTA |
100.5% |
Rv |
CTGGGATTCTGGGGTACAC |
FcPYL4 |
Fw |
ATGCCTCCCAACCCACCCAA |
104.0% |
Rv |
CGCTGCTGCTGCTGCTTCTT |
FcPYL8 |
Fw |
TGAAGCTTCCGAGCTTTCAT |
92.1% |
Rv |
GGTCCTTAAACTTTGACGGAAG |
FcPYL9 |
Fw |
GATGCACCTGCTAACAAAAGG |
90.1% |
Rv |
CAATCGTGTTTCTCATTTGTGC |
FcPYL11 |
Fw |
GAAAGGATGGCTGGTAATTGA |
91.0% |
Rv |
CGCTACAACAAGAAGTCAAGAA |
FcPYL12 |
Fw |
TTTCCTATCCTGCTGCTGCT |
96.1% |
Rv |
GCTTAGAATCCGAAACGGACTA |
FcPYR1 |
Fw |
GCTACCCAAATTGCTGAACC |
99.3% |
Rv |
GAATGACGAAAATGTCCTTGG |