Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

(E)-2-Benzylidenecyclanones: Part XVIII.[1] Study the Possible Link Between Glutathione Reactivity and Cancer Cell Cytotoxic Effects of Some Cyclic Chalcone Analogs. A Comparison of the Reactivity of the Open-Chain and the Seven-Membered Homologs

Altmetrics

Downloads

144

Views

54

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

supplementary.pdf (399.55KB )

Submitted:

20 April 2023

Posted:

21 April 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Non-enzymatic thiol addition into α,ß-unsaturated carbonyl system is associated with several biological effects. In vivo, the reactions can form small-molecule thiol (e.g., glutathione) or protein thiol adducts. The reaction of two synthetic (4’-methyl- and 4’-methoxy substituted) cyclic chalcone analogs with glutathione and N-acetylcysteine was studied by HPLC-UV method. The selected compounds displayed in vitro cancer cell cytotoxicity (IC50) of different orders of magnitude. The structure of the formed adducts was confirmed by HPLC-MS. The incubations were performed under three different pH conditions (pH 3.5/3.8, 6.3/6.7, and 8.0/7.4). The chalcones intrinsically reacted with both thiols under all incubation conditions. The initial rates and compositions of the final mixtures depended on the substitution and the pH. The frontier molecular orbitals and the Fukui function were carried out to investigate the effects on open-chain and seven-membered cyclic analogs. Furthermore, machine learning protocols were used to provide more insights into physicochemical properties and to support the different thiol-reactivity. HPLC analysis indicated diastereoselectivity of the reactions. The observed reactivities do not directly relate to the different in vitro cancer cell cytotoxicity of the compounds.
Keywords: 
Subject: Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Organic Chemistry

1. Introduction

Chalcones (I) are natural products, the biosynthetic precursors of flavonoids, a large family of plant phenolic secondary metabolites [2]. Because of the wide range of beneficial biological actions of the natural chalcones, several analogs have been syn-thesized and – among others - tested for their antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiprotozo-al, antiulcer, antihistaminic, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, anticancer and also neu-roprotective activities [3,4,5,6]. The molecular mechanisms of the published biologi-cal/pharmacological effects can be associated with their (a) non-covalent interactions with biological macromolecules and (b) covalent modification of preferably the soft nucleophilic thiol function(s) of amino acids, peptides, and proteins [7,8,9].
The chalcone structure can be devided into three different structural units; the aromatic rings A and B and the propenone linker (Figure 1). Modifying any of them can tune the main feature of interactions of the synthetic chalcones towards the non-covalent or the covalent pathway. In our previous studies, we have investigated how the substitution of the B-ring and the ring size of some cyclic chalcone analogs af-fect the cancer cell cytotoxic effect of more than 120 derivatives [10,11,12]. While com-paring the average IC50 values of the series, the benzosuberone (II) analogs displayed the most prosperous data against P388, L1210, Molt 4/C8, and CEM cells, as well as a panel of human tumor cell lines. In particular, the (E)-2-(4-methoxyphenylmethylene)-1-benzosuberone (II c) had the most remarkable cytotoxicity, possessing 11 times the potency of the reference drug melphalan when all five screens were considered [10,11].
In consecutive publications, we have performed cell cycle analysis of Jurkat cells exposed to IIc and its methyl-substituted counterpart IIb. It was demonstrated that equitoxic doses of the two cyclic chalcone analogs have different effects on the cell cy-cle progression of the investigated Jurkat cells. Compound IIc showed to cause an im-mediate G1 lift and G2/M arrest, followed by hypoploidity and aneuploidy. The re-markable effect of IIb on the G1 and G2 checkpoints could not be observed [13,14]. TLC and HPLC analysis showed the compounds to have intrinsic reactivity towards GSH [13,15]. However, the two compounds had different effects on the thiol status of the cells. Compound IIc significantly increased the oxidized glutathione (GSSG) level. On the contrary, IIb increased the GSH level, indicating enhanced cellular antioxidant potency [16].
In its reduced and oxidized forms (GSH, GSSG), glutathione is ubiquitous in mammalian cells ranging in 1–10 mM concentrations [17]. Under physiological condi-tions, more than 98% of total GSH occurs in reduced form [18,19]. The GSH/GSSG re-dox system is crucially participating and has a vital role in maintaining the environ-ment of the intracellular redox system, antioxidant defense system, and cellular sig-naling processes [20]. Furthermore, it is one of the endogenous substances involved in the metabolism of endogenous (e.g., estrogens, leukotrienes, prostaglandins) and ex-ogenous compounds (e.g., drugs, non-energy-producing xenobiotics) [21].
Covalent bond formation of GSH with electrophilic species affects the half-cell reduction potential of the GSSG/2GSH redox system. The GSH/GSSG ratio is a critical mechanism for cell survival; in fact, it is known that it varies in association with pro-liferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [22,23]. In our earlier publication [24], we re-ported on the thiol reactivity of two open-chain chalcones (Ib and IIc) with different cancer cell cytotoxicities [25]. We could not find a direct correlation of the thiol (GSH and NAC)) reactivities and the previously published biological (cancer cell cytotoxic) effects of the two chalcones. Continuing the previous studies on the molecular mecha-nism of the cancer cell cytotoxic and cell cycle modulating effects of IIb and IIc, we report on a comparative HPLC study on their intrinsic reactivity towards GSH and NAC. Compound IIc showed IC50 values towards most investigated cancer cell lines close to two magnitudes lower than the 4-methyl analog IIb (Table 2). Thus, the dif-ferences in the reactivities could reflect the differences in their previously published biological activities.
Table 1. IC50 (μM) data of selected E-2-(4’-X-benzylidene)-1-benzosuberones (II).
Table 1. IC50 (μM) data of selected E-2-(4’-X-benzylidene)-1-benzosuberones (II).
Compound P388 L1210 Molt 4/C8 CEM Human tumor cells
IIa 12.7 106.0 42.7 28.9 18.6
IIb 11.8 25.0 21.3 11.4 11.2
IIc 1.6 0.34 0.47 0.35 0.27
Similar to the previous publication [24], the reactions were studied under three conditions with different pH: (a) pH 8.0/7.4, (b) pH 6.3/6.8, and (c) pH 3.2/3.7. The first pH values indicate the pH of the aqueous solution of the thiols before starting the incubations. The second pH values indicate the virtual pH of the incubation mixtures, which contained 75.5% v/v methanol (MeOH). The basic pH was selected because such conditions mimic that of the GST-catalyzed reactions; the ionization of the GSH thiol-moiety is increased due to its interaction with the basic imidazole N-atom in the active site of the enzyme [26]. The slightly acidic pH (pH 6.3) resembles the slightly acidic pH of the cancer cells [27]. The strong acid conditions (pH 3.2) were selected to compare the reactivity of the protonated and the ionized forms of the thiols function of the two compounds. The pKa of GSH and NAC was reported to be 8.83 and 9.52, respectively. Accordingly, the thiol function of both compounds exists exclusively in the protonated (neutral) form [28].
Preprints 71455 g001
Figure 1. Structure and numbering of 4-X-chalcones (I) and (E)-2-(4’-X-phenylmethylene-1-benzosuberones (II).
Figure 1. Structure and numbering of 4-X-chalcones (I) and (E)-2-(4’-X-phenylmethylene-1-benzosuberones (II).
Preprints 71455 g001
The thiol additions to enones are reported to be reversible, resulting in an equilib-rium mixture's formation. To qualitatively characterize the progress of the reactions, the composition of the incubation mixtures was analyzed at the 15, 45, 75, 105, 135, 165, 195, 225, 255, 285, and 315 min time points by HPLC-UV-VIS. Furthermore, den-sity functional theory (DFT) calculations and machine learning (ML) protocols were used to analyze the stability and regioselectivity of chalcone analogs on a structural basis. In the analyses, methanethiol (CH3SH) and its deprotonated form (CH3S-) were used as model thiols.

2. Results

2.1. Reactions under Slightly Basic (pH 8.0/7.4) Conditions

Initially, we investigated the reactions of IIb and IIc under basic conditions. Considering the pKa values of GSH (8.83) and NAC (9.52), about 3.6% of the GSH and 0.75% of the NAC molecules are under pH 7.4 conditions. The reaction with GSH (Figure 2) and NAC (Figure 3) of both cyclic chalcones have intrinsic reactivity with the investigated thiols. By the end of the incubation period (315 min) with GSH, the initial area of the HPLC peak corresponding to the parent compounds IIb and IIc reduced by 43.5% and 26.3 %, respectively (Table 1). While the compounds were incubated with NAC, the respective figures were 7.9% and 7.6% (Table 2). Changes in the chromatographic peak areas of the starting chalcones as a function of the incubation time indicated that the compositions reflect the equilibrium only in the case of the NAC incubation (Figure 3).
As a result of the addition reactions, two new chiral centers are formed. Considering the inherent chirality of the two thiols, the formation of four diastereomeric adducts was expected. However, only two separate peaks could be detected under the present chromatographic conditions. The analysis showed a slight excess of the less polar diastereomers in both cases. The structure of the parent chalcones and their GSH and NAC conjugates were verified by HPLC-MS (Figures S1-S6).
Table 2. Retention times (tR)1 and integrated peak areas (A) of the investigated cyclic chalcone analogs (IIb and IIc) and their GSH adducts2.
Table 2. Retention times (tR)1 and integrated peak areas (A) of the investigated cyclic chalcone analogs (IIb and IIc) and their GSH adducts2.
pH 3 Compound tR
(E)-Chalcone		 Area Ratio 4
A315/A0 		tR
(Z)-Chalcone		 Area
(Z)-Chalcone		 tR
GSH–1		 Area
GSH–1		 tR
GSH–2		 Area
GSH–2
3.2 IIb 17.1 0.89 16.8 55.1 14.85 74.9 15.25 111.5
3.2 IIc 16.6 0.95 16.3 136.1 ND5 - ND5 -
6.3 IIb 17.0 0.84 16.7 446.6 14.6 297.2 15.1 331.8
6.3 IIc 16.9 0.91 16.7 513.4 14.2 233.6 14.8 256.4
8.0 IIb 17.4 0.57 17.1 302.8 15.0 2847.0 15.4 3216.3
8.0 IIc 16.8 0.74 16.5 412.0 13.9 2584.9 14.6 2785.0
1 Retention times in minutes; 2 data refer to the average of two independent measurements at the 315 min time point; 3 pH value of the aqueous thiol solution; 4 ratios of peak areas measured at 0 and 315 min; 5 not detectable.
The time course of increase of the two separated peaks, GSH-1 and GSH-2, and NAC-1 and NAC-2 showed some characteristic differences. In the case of the GSH adducts of IIb and IIc, the peak areas almost linearly increased over time. The progression curves of formation of the adducts, however, showed somewhat different slopes, especially from the 105-minute timepoint. In the case of the NAC-adducts, the progression curves deviate from linearity. The curvatures of the concave curves are different from the 75-minute timepoint. By the end of the incubation period (315 min), the ratio of the two peaks of the GSH incubations remained close to unity (1.13 and 1.08 for IIb and IIc, respectively). In the case of the NAC incubations, the respective ratios were 1.91 and 1.80 (Table 2 and Table 3). The formation of (Z)-chalcones could be detected in all four incubations. In the case of the NAC incubations, the area of the (Z)-peaks is comparable with those of the chalcone-NAC adducts (Table 2 and Table 3).
Table 3. Retention times (tr)1 and integrated peak areas (A) of the investigated cyclic chalcone analogs (IIb and IIc) and their NAC adducts2.
Table 3. Retention times (tr)1 and integrated peak areas (A) of the investigated cyclic chalcone analogs (IIb and IIc) and their NAC adducts2.
pH 3 Compound tR
(E)-Chalcone		 Area Ratio 4
A315/A0 		tR
(Z)-Chalcone		 Area
(Z)-Chalcone		 tR
NAC–1		 Area
NAC–1		 tR
NAC–2		 Area
NAC–2
3.2 IIb 17.1 0.76 16.8 124.1 N/D5 - N/D5 -
3.2 IIc 16.6 0.88 16.3 126.9 N/D5 - N/D5 -
6.3 IIb 17.5 0.93 17.2 118.9 16.3 60.0 16.5 513.9
6.3 IIc 16.7 0.91 16.4 184.5 15.3 61.8 15.6 392.1
8.0 IIb 17.5 0.92 17.2 467.5 16.3 477.7 16.5 913.4
8.0 IIc 17.0 0.92 16.8 541.9 15.7 347.5 15.9 624.2
1 Retention times in minutes; 2 data refer to the average of two independent measurements at the 315 min time point; 3 pH value of the aqueous thiol solution; 4 ratios of peak areas measured at 0 and 315 min, 5 not detectable.
Preprints 71455 g004
Figure 4. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 1 of IIb and IIc in the chalcone-GSH incubations at pH 8.0/7.4.
Figure 4. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 1 of IIb and IIc in the chalcone-GSH incubations at pH 8.0/7.4.
Preprints 71455 g004
Preprints 71455 g005
Figure 5. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 2 of IIb and IIc in the chalcone-GSH incubations at pH 8.0/7.4.
Figure 5. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 2 of IIb and IIc in the chalcone-GSH incubations at pH 8.0/7.4.
Preprints 71455 g005
Preprints 71455 g006
Figure 6. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 1 of IIb and IIc in the chalcone-NAC incubations at pH 8.0/7.4.
Figure 6. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 1 of IIb and IIc in the chalcone-NAC incubations at pH 8.0/7.4.
Preprints 71455 g006
Preprints 71455 g007
Figure 7. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 2 of IIb and IIc in the chalcone-NAC incubations at pH 8.0/7.4.
Figure 7. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 2 of IIb and IIc in the chalcone-NAC incubations at pH 8.0/7.4.
Preprints 71455 g007

2.2. Reaction under Slightly Acidic (pH 6.3/6.8) Conditions

The reaction of the cyclic chalcones with the two thiols under slightly acidic conditions (virtual pH 6.8) mimics the cellular milieu of the cancer cells [27]. Under such conditions, about 0.9% of the GSH molecules and 0.2% of the NAC molecules exist in the more reactive thiolate form. The change in the concentration (chromatographic peak areas) of the starting chalcones IIb and IIc show parallelism in both reactions (Figure 8 and Figure 9). By the end of the incubation period (315 min) with GSH, the initial area of the HPLC peak of IIa and IIb was reduced by 16.1% and 9.1%, respectively. While the compounds were incubated with NAC, the respective figures were 8.9% and 7.1%. These latter figures are very close to those obtained under slightly basic conditions (Table 2 and Table 3).
In the GSH incubations, the separated HPLC peak areas of the IIb-GSH and IIc-GSH diastereomers increased closely parallel over time (Figures S7 and S8). At the end of the incubation period, the ratio of the area of two separated peaks of the chalcone-GSH adducts is close to unity (1.12 and 1.10 for IIb and IIc, respectively) (Table 4). A similar tendency could be observed for the NAC-2 peak (peak with the higher retention time) area of IIb and IIc (Figure S10). At the same time, the chromatographic peak area of the NAC-1 peak of IIc remained practically unchanged, but that of IIb slightly increased (Figure S9). As a result, the ratio of the NAC-2/NAC-1 areas at the 315 timepoint was 8.57 and 6.34 for IIb and IIc, respectively (Table 4). In all four incubations, the peak areas of the (Z)-chalcones are comparable to those of the formed adducts (Table 4). Since the only source of the (Z) isomers under the experimental conditions is the retro-Michael reactions, it is reasonable to presume that the observed diastereomeric distributions do not reflect the results of the kinetics-controlled reactions.

2.3. Reaction under Acid (pH 3.2/3.8) Conditions

Under stronger acidic conditions, the thiol function of both GSH and NAC exists exclusively in protonated (neutral) form. Although the protonated thiols can act as nucleophilic reagents, their reactivity is much lower than that of their deprotonated (negatively charged) counterparts [29]. In the chalcone-GSH incubations, progression curves of the reactions (reduction of the initial area of the chalcones) showed a very slight downhill linear shape (Figure S11). At the end of the incubations, the initial values of the peak areas of IIb and IIc were reduced by 10.6% and 5.3%, respectively. At the same time, a linear increase in the peak area of the IIb-GSH adduct /peak 1 and peak 2) could be observed in parallel (Figures S12 and S13). The peaks corresponding to the respective IIc-GSH adducts could not be detected. The ratio of the IIb-GSH isomeric peaks (315 min timepoint) was 1.48. The areas of the respective (Z) isomers were much lower than in the pH 8.0 and pH 6.3 incubations (Table 2).
In the chalcone-NAC incubations, the reduction of the initial area of the chalcones showed a very slight downhill linear shape with somewhat different slopes (Figure S14). The initial peak area of IIb and IIc was reduced by 23.7% and 12.1% by the 315 min timepoint (Table 3). However, no II-NAC peaks could be identified. HPLV-UV analysis of the incubates showed the formation of several small peaks; more polar than the parent IIb and IIc. HPLC-MS investigations indicated the expected adduct formation, but it was impossible to identify them in the HPLC-UV chromatograms (Figures S15 and S16). In both incubations, the formation of the (Z) isomers could be seen (Table 3).

2.4. Molecular modeling analysis

Table 5 shows the calculated values for molecular properties of Ia, IIa, methanethiol (CH3SH), and deprotonated methanethiol [CH3S-]. The highest occupied molecular orbital energy (EHOMO) reflects the ability of a molecule to donate electrons, the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy (ELUMO) demonstrates the ability to accept electrons (see Figure 10), and the gap energies (ΔELUMO-HOMO) are related with the chemical stability of molecules.
The chemical potential, chemical hardness, and electrophilicity are defined as ( μ = ∂ E ∂ N υ ), ( η = 1 2 ∂ 2 E ∂ N 2 υ ), and ( ω = μ 2 2 η ), respectively. η indicates the resistance of the molecule to alter its electronic density distribution and is higher for IIa. On the other hand, μ indicates the change in free energy when electrons are added or removed from the molecule. At the same time, ω is a measure of a molecule's tendency to act as an electrophile. The value of ω increased for Ia, and μ decreased when compared to IIa.
Figure 11 shows the isosurfaces of the Fukui function (obtained from electron density) for the molecules Ia, IIa, and CH3SH, with focus on atoms that can undergo nucleophilic attack ( f + = ∂ ρ r / ∂ N υ r + , ). The positive and negative regions of the Fukui function are represented by the green and blue isosurfaces, respectively.
In order to depict the distribution of electric charge on the molecular surface, a molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) map was generated (Figure 12). The red spots on the MEP surface represent the electron-rich sites and are susceptible to electrophilic attack. In contrast, the blue spots represent the electron-depleted regions and are sites susceptible to nucleophilic attack. For CH3S-, the MEP is reddish due to the −1 negative charge resulting from deprotonation.
The kOH rate constants were calculated for chalcone compounds, and the results indicate that the compounds with the highest kOH values point to greater reactivity. The order of reactivity potential was observed as CH3SH (9.15×109x M−1 s−1) Ia (9.01×109x M−1 s−1) > IIa (7.85×109x M−1 s−1) > CH3S- (5.48×109x M−1 s−1).

3. Discussion

Our experiment showed that both cyclic chalcone analogs (IIb and IIc) have intrinsic reactivity with GSH and NAC under all three experimental conditions. The results strengthen the results of our previous studies obtained by TLC analysis of similar incubations with GSH of the two compounds [13]. Considering the pKa values of GSH (8.83) and NAC (9.52) thiols, it can be seen that the fraction of the stronger nucleophile thiolate form of GSH is higher than that of NAC under each experimental condition. Under the slightly basic conditions (pH 8.0/7.4), the rate of reduction of the HPLC peak area of the starting chalcones showed a linear decrease. Since the area is based on the absorbance (logarithmic function of the concentration) of the compounds, the reactions follow pseudo-first-order kinetics. In the case of both thiols, relatively high amounts of (Z)-chalcone isomers could be detected in the incubations (Table 2 and Table 3). Since the reaction mixtures were incubated in the dark, the corresponding retro-Michael reactions are the only source of the (Z)-isomer formations. Accordingly, the progression curves of the incubations (Figure 2 and Figure 3) reflect the disappearance of the starting compounds due to the net change of the reversible reactions. Similar levels of the respective (Z)-isomers could be detected in the incubations performed under slightly acidic (pH 6.3/6.7) conditions (Table 2 and Table 3). On the contrary, the reactions of the respective open-chain chalcones (Ib and Ic) performed under identical conditions did not result in a detectable level of (Z)-isomers in the GSH or the NAC incubations [24].
The results obtained in the pH 6.3/6.7 incubations are similar to those of the pH 8.0/7.4 ones (Table 2 and Table 3). Under such conditions, however, the composition of both incubations represents equilibrium mixtures. Similar to the pH 8.0/7.4 incubations, the conversion of IIb is somewhat higher in the case of both thiols. The observation further strengthens the previously suggested view that the different reactivities can be (at least partly) the result of the different stability of the thiol adducts [24,30]. Similar to the results obtained under identical conditions with the respective open-chain chalcones (I), the 4-methyl-substituted derivative (IIb) forms the more stable adducts.
Comparing the compositions of the 315 min incubation mixtures of the two series (I and II), it can be seen that the conversions of the 4-CH3- and 4-OCH3-substituted chalcones (Ib and Ic) are much higher than those of the IIb and IIc (Table 6). 13C NMR shifts, indicating the electron density around the particular nucleus, of the β-carbon atom of IIb (138.0 ppm) and IIc (137.7 ppm), were reported to be similar. A similar slight (0.3 ppm) difference was observed in the case of the respective open-chain chalcones Ib and Ic [31]. Since the nature of thiols and the aromatic substituents are the same, the ring structure can explain the observed differences in reactivities of the two series.
Amslinger et al. investigated the thiol reactivity of chalcones with various substituents in their α-position. The kinetics of thiol reactivities of the derivatives were correlated with some of their biological effects directly connected to their Michael acceptor ability [32,33]. For example, α-methyl substitution of 2',3,4,4’-tetramethoxychalcone (TMC) decreased, α-cyano substitution substantially increased the thiol reactivity of the nonsubstituted TMC [34]. Based on these earlier observations, it is reasonable to suppose that the reduced reactivity of the benzosuberone derivatives IIb and IIc is the consequence of added effects of the α-alkyl substitution and the conformational strain caused by the cyclic structure of the starting enone and the reaction intermediate. Further research is needed to characterize the electronic and stereochemical effects of ring numerically.
As a result of the addition reactions, the formation of four diastereomeric adducts is possible. Because of the inherent chirality of GSH and NAC, two cis adducts and two trans adducts are expected to be formed. Earlier, Armstrong et al. reported on the stereochemistry of the GSTM 4-4-catalyzed reaction of GSH and the open-chain chalcone analog (E)-(4’-X-phenyl)-3-butene-2-ones (PBO). In the reactions, a higher amount of the more polar adducts were formed [35]. Based on the results of HPLC separation of the diastereomeric pairs of the PBO-GSH [35] and the I-GSH [24] adducts, we can presume that the two separated peaks formed in the present reactions correspond to the diastereomeric cis and trans adducts.
The ratio of the area of the two separated peaks in the GSH incubates (315 min timepoint) was close to the unity for IIb and IIc under both pH (pH 8.0/7.4 and 6.3/6.8) conditions (Table 2). Similar to our previous results, higher peak areas of the least polar adducts were observed in each case. On the contrary, HPLC analysis of the reactions of IIb and IIc with NAC showed different (1.8-8.57 times) excess of the least polar diastereomer (Table 3). Similar to the previous results obtained with the open-chain chalcones (Ib and Ic) [24], the observed diastereoselectivity was affected by the nature of the 4-substituent and the pH. Thus, the methyl–substituted IIb showed higher diastereoselectivity at both pH values. Diastereoselectivity was increased as the pH was reduced (Table 3). It is worth mentioning, however, that the observed diastereoselectivities do not reflect the diastereoselectivity of the addition reactions. Under both conditions (pH 8.0/7.4 and 6.3/6.8), the peak areas of the (Z)-isomers and the adducts are comparable (Table 3). Since the retro-Michael reaction is the only source of formation of the (Z)-isomers, the observed ratios reflect the actual balance of the kinetic and thermodynamic controls.
Under the acid conditions (pH 3.2/3.8), the formation of the respective conjugates is exclusively due to the nucleophilic addition of the protonated thiol forms onto the polarized carbon-carbon double bounds. In comparison of the respective compositions of the GSH incubates with those of the previously reported (open chain) chalcones (Ib and Ic) [24], the derivatives with the same substituent showed similar GSH reactivities (Table 2). However, different results were obtained in the case of the reactions with NAC. The 315-minute percent conversion was found to be higher for IIb (23.7%) and IIc (12.1%) than those of the corresponding open-chain chalcones Ib and Ic (10.9% and 1.5%, respectively) (Table 5). However, no II-NAC adducts could be identified in the HPLC-UV chromatograms. Instead, several small, unidentified peaks appeared (Figures S15 and S16). HPLC-MS analysis could identify the expected conjugates. The structural characterization of the other products is out of the scope of the present work.
To obtain physicochemical properties insights into different reactivities of chalcones (I) [24] and their seven-membered cyclic analogs (II), HOMO and LUMO molecular orbital energy and some electrophilic reactivity parameters of Ia, IIa, - and as model thiols –CH3SH and CH3S- were calculated (Table 5). According to the Hard and Soft, Acids and Bases (HSAB) theory [36], nucleophilic-electrophilic reactions occur preferably between electrophiles and nucleophiles of similar hardness or softness. In the case of the α,ß-unsaturated ketone, the carbonyl oxygen atom withdraws electrons from the C2=C10 bond – generating an electron deficiency at C10 – the most likely site to receive nucleophilic attacks. In methanethiol, the nucleophilic attacks can occur at the sulfur atom. In compounds Ia and IIa, the carbonyl O has a high negative charge density, indicating its Lewis base behavior. On the other hand, regions of lower charge density, which appear in blue, indicate the Lewis acid behavior of the molecules.
The LUMO energy showed that Ia (-35.98 kcal/mol) is more acidic than IIa (-28.44 kcal/mol. The LUMO energy of CH3SH is (-2.979 kcal/mol), which increases to (77.99 kcal/mol) in its deprotonated form (CH3S-). These characters are also reflected by all the other determined parameters (Table 5). Therefore, molecular orbital calculations provided data to support the experimental findings. The equilibrium (close-to-equilibrium) compositions of Ib and Ic show a higher product ratio than the cyclic chalcone analog IIb and IIc.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Chalcones IIb and IIc were synthesized as previously published [10]. Their structures were characterized by IR and NMR spectroscopy [37]. The purity and structures of the investigated samples were verified by HPLC-MS (Figures S1 and S2). Reduced l-glutathione, N-acetyl l-cysteine, HPLC, and MS-grade methanol solvent were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Budapest, Hungary). Trifluoroacetic acid HiperSolve CHROMANORM and formic acid were obtained from VWR (Budapest, Hungary) and Fischer Chemicals, respectively. Deionized water for use in HPLC and HPLC-MS measurements was purified by Millipore Direct-QTM at the Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry (University of Pécs). Mobile phases used for HPLC measurements were degassed by an ultrasonic water bath before use.

4.2. Preparation of Solutions

The thiol solutions (reduced glutathione (GSH) and N-acetylcysteine (NAC)) preparation were as follows: 2.0 × 10−1 mol·L−1 (0.3 mmol) of the respective thiol was dissolved in water, and the pH was set to either 3.2, 6.3, or 8.0 using 1M NaOH solution to a final volume of 1.5 mL (solution-1). The chalcone solution consisted of 6.5 × 10−3 mol·L−1 (0.03 mmol) chalcone analog dissolved in 4.6 mL HPLC-grade methanol (solution-2). Solution-1 and solution-2 were mixed to give a final volume of 6.1 mL. The molar ratio of thiol to chalcone in the mixture was 10:1. The mixture was kept in the dark, 37 °C water bath for 315 minutes. The first sample was taken at 15 minutes, and onward samples were taken at every 30 minutes time points (11 samples in total).
To evaluate the initial (0 min) peak area of chalcones 1 and 2, solution-2 was prepared without any change, while solution-1 was prepared without the thiol component. Before mixing, the solutions were pre-incubated at 37 °C for 30 min to mimic the incubation conditions. To compare the products of the previously proven light-initiated E/Z isomerization of the parent compounds [27] with those of the non-light (retro-Michael addition)-initiated isomerization, solution-2 of the respective chalcones were prepared and exposed to the unscattered laboratory light for 1 week. The solutions were analyzed by HPLC-UV-VIS and HPLC-MS. (Figures S17 and S18).

4.3. RP-HPLC-UV-VIS Measurements

UV–VIS detector coupled Agilent 1100 HPLC system analyzed the samples at 260 nm wavelength. The separation system was a reversed-phase chromatographic system, and the column Zorbax Eclipse XBD-C8 (150 mm × 4.6 mm, particle size 5 µm; Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) was used. The oven temperature was set to 25 °C to avoid room temperature fluctuations. The injection volume was 10 µL. At a 1.2 mL/min flow rate, gradient elution was performed by (A) water and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and (B) methanol and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The elution profile consisted of 8 min of 40% isocratically, an increase to 60% B in 4 min, and a further linear increase of eluent B to 90% in 3 minutes. The elution gradient remained constant for 5 min period. Then it was linearly decreased to the initial 40% in 2 min, followed by a 3 min constant of 40% of eluent B for equilibration of the column.

4.4. HPLC-MS Measurements

HPLC ESI-MS analyses were performed on an Ultimate 3000 liquid chromatograph (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) coupled with a Thermo Q Exactive Focus quadrupole-Orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The scan monitored m/z values ranging from 100 to 1000 Da. Data acquisition was carried out using Q Exactive Focus 2.1 and Xcalibur 4.2 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Analysis of compounds and adducts was performed in HESI positive and negative ionization modes with the following parameters: spray voltage, 3500 V; vaporizer temperature, 300 °C; capillary temperature, 350 °C; spray and auxiliary gas flows, 30 and 10 arbitrary units, respectively; resolution, 35,000 at 200 m/z; and fragmentation, 20 eV.
HPLC separation was performed on an Accucore C18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, particle size 2.6 µm), and an Accucore C18 guard column (5 mm × 2.1 mm, particle size 2.6 µm) was also used. The injection volume was 5 µL; the flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. Data analysis and evaluations were performed using Xcalibur 4.2 and FreeStyle 1.7 software. A binary gradient of eluents was used, consisting of mobile phases A and B.
The gradient parameters in chalcones were (A) water and 0.1% formic acid and (B) methanol and 0.1% formic acid. The gradient elution was as follows: isocratic elution for 1 min to 20% eluent B, continued by a linear gradient to 100% in 9 min, followed by an isocratic plateau for 2 min. Then, the column was equilibrated back to 20% in 0.5 min and continued isocratically for 2.5 min. The sampler was at room temperature, and the column oven was at 40 °C.
The parameters of the gradient in the case of adducts were (A) water and 0.1% formic acid and (B) methanol and 0.1% formic acid. The gradient elution was as follows: isocratic elution for 1 min to 10% eluent B, continued by a linear gradient to 95% in 13 min, followed by an isocratic plateau for 3 min. Finally, the column was equilibrated to 10% in 0.1 min and continued isocratically for 2.9 min. The sampler was at room temperature, and the column oven was at 40 °C. The diode array detector was also set at 260 nm wavelength alongside MS analysis.

4.5. Molecular modeling analysis

The structures Ia, IIa, CH3SH, and CH3S- were constructed using the Gaussview 6.0 software. Theoretical calculations were performed by DFT [38,39], implemented in the G16 [40] software package. The molecules were optimized using the hybrid exchange and correlation functional with long-range correction, M06-2X [41], combined with the basis set 6-311++G(d,p) in the gas phase. Frontier molecular orbitals (FMO) [42] were obtained. Molecular electrostatic potential maps contributed to the global electrophilicity analysis through their electronic isodensity surfaces. MEP [43] maps provide a visual representation of the electrostatic potential on the surface of a molecule, which can reveal regions of high and low electron density. The electrostatic potential V(r) [44] at point r is defined as.
V r = ∑ α Z A r α − r A − ∫ ρ ( r ) r α − r d r
where ZAis the charge of nuclei α at point r α and ρ ( r ) is the charge density at point r. The local electrophilicity of the molecules was determined by the Fukui function [45,46], and then it was possible to predict the molecular site selectivity.
f r = ∂ ρ r ∂ N v ,
where N is the number of electrons in the system, and the constant term v in the partial derivative is external potential. Multiwfn 3.6 program [47] was used to calculate the Fukui. In addition, the pySiRC [48] – a machine-learning computational platform, a machine-learning computational platform, was used to simulate oxidation reactions facilitated by free-radical compounds. To imitate the oxidation impact induced by a radical attack, the hydroxyl radical (˙OH) was chosen as the archetype system of degradation reactions. The reaction rate constant of the oxidative attack caused by the hydroxyl radical on chalcones compounds was predicted using the XGBoost ML algorithm and the MACCS fingerprint was employed as a structural descriptor.

5. Conclusions

The present work investigated the instantaneous GSH- and NAC-reactivity of two cyclic chalcones analogs (IIb and IIc) with different cancer cell cytotoxicities. The reactivity of the two compounds was investigated under three different acid-base conditions. The progress of the reactions, disappearance of the parent compounds, and appearance of the thiol-conjugates were monitored by the HPLC-UV method. Comparison of the reactivities of IIb and IIc with those of the respective open-chain chalcones showed the cyclic analogs to be less reactive under each investigated condition. In both series, the 4-CH3 substituted derivatives displayed higher reactivities. The substituent effect could be rationalized by the higher electron-donating power of the 4-OCH3 substituent. The alkyl substitution of the α-carbon atom and the cyclic structure can explain the lower reactivities of IIb and IIc compared to the open-chain counterparts (Ib and Ic). The theoretical calculations of orbital energies and electrophilic reactivity parameters provided evidence that supports the experimental findings – the open chalcone exhibits higher electronegativity and reactivity than its cyclic counterpart.
Cytotoxicity and cell cycle modulating effects of IIb and IIc showed characteristic differences. The present results do not indicate a direct correlation with the cancer cell cytotoxicity of the two derivatives, which are of two orders of magnitude different against most of the investigated cell lines. The anticancer potential of chalcones is correlated with their ability to act on various molecular targets such as ABCG2, tubulin, activated nuclear B cell growth (NF-κB), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tyrosine kinase receptor (EGFR), mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET), 5-α reductase, ACP-reductase, histone deacetylase, p53, CDC25B (protein tyrosine phosphatase), retinoic acid receptors, estrogenic topoisomerase receptors and MDM2 [9]. Considering the present and our previous results [10,11,12,13,14,15,16], it is reasonable to suppose that the molecular basis of the different biological effects of IIb and IIc is related to the non-covalent interactions of the compounds [49].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org. Figure S1. High-resolution, positive-mode HESI MS spectrum of IIb. Figure S2. High-resolution, positive-mode HESI MS spectrum of IIc. Figure S3. High-resolution, positive-mode HESI MS spectrum of IIb–GSH conjugate. Figure S4. High-resolution, negative-mode HESI MS spectrum of IIb–NAC conjugate. Figure S5. High-resolution, positive-mode HESI MS spectrum of IIc–GSH conjugate. Figure S6. High-resolution, negative-mode HESI MS spectrum of IIc–NAC conjugate. Figure S7. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 1 of II b and II c in the chalcone–GSH incubations at pH 6.3/6.8. Figure S8. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 2 of IIb and IIc in the chalcone–GSH incubations at pH 6.3/6.8. Figure S9. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 1 of IIb and IIc in the chalcone–NAC incubations at pH 6.3/6.8. Figure S10. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 2 of IIb and IIc in the chalcone–NAC incubations at pH 6.3/6.8. Figure S11. Change in the chromatographic peak area of IIb and IIc in the chalcone–GSH incubations at pH 3.2/3.7. Figure S12. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 1 of IIb in the chalcone–GSH incubations at pH 3.2/3.7. Figure S13. Change in the chromatographic peak area of adduct 2 of IIb in the chalcone–GSH incubations at pH 3.2/3.7. Figure S14. Change in the chromatographic peak area of IIb and IIc in the chalcone–NAC incubations at pH 3.2/3.7. Figure S16. HPLC-UV chromatogram of pH 3.2/3.7 incubation (315 min time point) of IIc and NAC. Figure S17. HPLC-UV spectrum of (E)(tR 17.21 min)/(Z)(tr 16.97 min) isomeric mixture of IIb. Figure S18. HPLC-UV-VIS spectrum of (E)(tR 16.89 min)/(Z)(tr 16.675 min) isomeric mixture of IIc.

Author Contributions

Fatemeh Kenari: Writing initial draft, writing review, investigation, data curation; Szilárd Molnár: Writing-review, investigation, data curation; Igor D. Borges: Writing initial draft, writing review, investigation, data curation, Hamilton B. Napolitano: Conceptualization, writing initial draft, writing review and editing; Pál Perjési: Project administration, conceptualization, writing initial draft, writing-review, and editing.

Funding

This study was supported by the European Union and co-financed by the European Social Fund (EFOP-3.6.1.-16-2016-00004). The financial support is highly appreciated. The authors are grateful to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Goiás (FAPEG). Theoretical calculations were performed in the High-Performance Computing Center of the Universidade Estadual de Goiás.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds I and II are available from the authors.

References

  1. Kenari, F.; Molnár, S.; Pintér, Z.; Bitaraf, S.; Perjési, P. (E)-2-Benzylidenecyclanones: Part XVII. An LC-MS Study of Microsomal Transformation Reactions of (E)-2-[(4’-Methoxyphenyl)Methylene]-Benzosuberon-1-One: A Cyclic Chalcone Analog. J. Pharm. Biopharm. Res. 2023, 4, 326–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rozmer, Z.; Perjési, P. Naturally Occurring Chalcones and Their Biological Activities. Phytochemistry Reviews 2016, 15, 87–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. K. Sahu, N.; S. Balbhadra, S.; Choudhary, J.; V. Kohli, D. Exploring Pharmacological Significance of Chalcone Scaffold: A Review. CMC 2012, 19, 209–225. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Singh, P.; Anand, A.; Kumar, V. Recent Developments in Biological Activities of Chalcones: A Mini Review. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2014, 85, 758–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhou, B. Diverse Molecular Targets for Chalcones with Varied Bioactivities. Med chem 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhuang, C.; Zhang, W.; Sheng, C.; Zhang, W.; Xing, C.; Miao, Z. Chalcone: A Privileged Structure in Medicinal Chemistry. Chemical reviews 2017, 117, 7762–7810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karthikeyan, C.; Narayana Moorthy, N.S.H.; Ramasamy, S.; Vanam, U.; Manivannan, E.; Karunagaran, D.; Trivedi, P. Advances in Chalcones with Anticancer Activities. PRA 2014, 10, 97–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gomes, M.; Muratov, E.; Pereira, M.; Peixoto, J.; Rosseto, L.; Cravo, P.; Andrade, C.; Neves, B. Chalcone Derivatives: Promising Starting Points for Drug Design. Molecules 2017, 22, 1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Constantinescu, T.; Mihis, A.G. Two Important Anticancer Mechanisms of Natural and Synthetic Chalcones. IJMS 2022, 23, 11595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dimmock, J.R.; Kandepu, N.M.; Nazarali, A.J.; Kowalchuk, T.P.; Motaganahalli, N.; Quail, J.W.; Mykytiuk, P.A.; Audette, G.F.; Prasad, L.; Perjési, P.; et al. Conformational and Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship Study of Cytotoxic 2-Arylidenebenzocycloalkanones. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 1358–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dimmock, J.R.; Zello, G.A.; Oloo, E.O.; Quail, J.W.; Kraatz, H.-B.; Perjési, P.; Aradi, F.; Takács-Novák, K.; Allen, T.M.; Santos, C.L.; et al. Correlations between Cytotoxicity and Topography of Some 2-Arylidenebenzocycloalkanones Determined by X-Ray Crystallography. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 3103–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Perjési, P.; Das, U.; De Clercq, E.; Balzarini, J.; Kawase, M.; Sakagami, H.; Stables, J.P.; Lorand, T.; Rozmer, Z.; Dimmock, J.R. Design, Synthesis and Antiproliferative Activity of Some 3-Benzylidene-2,3-Dihydro-1-Benzopyran-4-Ones Which Display Selective Toxicity for Malignant Cells. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2008, 43, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rozmer, Z.; Berki, T.; Perjési, P. Different Effects of Two Cyclic Chalcone Analogues on Cell Cycle of Jurkat T Cells. Toxicology in Vitro 2006, 20, 1354–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pilatova, M.; Varinska, L.; Perjesi, P.; Sarissky, M.; Mirossay, L.; Solar, P.; Ostro, A.; Mojzis, J. In Vitro Antiproliferative and Antiangiogenic Effects of Synthetic Chalcone Analogues. Toxicology in Vitro 2010, 24, 1347–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Perjési, P.; Maász, G.; Reisch, R.; Benkő, A. (E)-2-Benzylidenebenzocyclanones: Part VII. Investigation of the Conjugation Reaction of Two Cytotoxic Cyclic Chalcone Analogues with Glutathione: An HPLC–MS Study. Monatsh Chem 2012, 143, 1107–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rozmer, Z.; Berki, T.; Maász, G.; Perjési, P. Different Effects of Two Cyclic Chalcone Analogues on Redox Status of Jurkat T Cells. Toxicology in Vitro 2014, 28, 1359–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lu, S.C. Glutathione Synthesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects 2013, 1830, 3143–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ballatori, N.; Krance, S.M.; Notenboom, S.; Shi, S.; Tieu, K.; Hammond, C.L. Glutathione Dysregulation and the Etiology and Progression of Human Diseases. bchm 2009, 390, 191–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Forman, H.J.; Zhang, H.; Rinna, A. Glutathione: Overview of Its Protective Roles, Measurement, and Biosynthesis. Molecular Aspects of Medicine 2009, 30, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jones, D.P. [11] Redox Potential of GSH/GSSG Couple: Assay and Biological Significance. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier, 2002; Volume 348, pp. 93–112. ISBN 978-0-12-182251-4. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dickinson, D.A.; Forman, H.J. Cellular Glutathione and Thiols Metabolism. Biochemical Pharmacology 2002, 64, 1019–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Moran, L.; Gutteridge, J.; Quinlan, G. Thiols in Cellular Redox Signalling and Control. CMC 2001, 8, 763–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Aw, T.Y. Cellular Redox: A Modulator of Intestinal Epithelial Cell Proliferation. Physiology 2003, 18, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kenari, F.; Molnár, S.; Perjési, P. Reaction of Chalcones with Cellular Thiols. The Effect of the 4-Substitution of Chalcones and Protonation State of the Thiols on the Addition Process. Diastereoselective Thiol Addition. Molecules 2021, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Drutovic, D.; Chripkova, M.; Pilatova, M.; Kruzliak, P.; Perjesi, P.; Sarissky, M.; Lupi, M.; Damia, G.; Broggini, M.; Mojzis, J. Benzylidenetetralones, Cyclic Chalcone Analogues, Induce Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis in HCT116 Colorectal Cancer Cells. Tumor Biol. 2014, 35, 9967–9975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Caccuri, A.M.; Antonini, G.; Board, P.G.; Parker, M.W.; Nicotra, M.; Bello, M.L.; Federici, G.; Ricci, G. Proton Release on Binding of Glutathione to Alpha, Mu and Delta Class Glutathione Transferases. Biochemical Journal 1999, 344, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rohani, N.; Hao, L.; Alexis, M.S.; Joughin, B.A.; Krismer, K.; Moufarrej, M.N.; Soltis, A.R.; Lauffenburger, D.A.; Yaffe, M.B.; Burge, C.B.; et al. Acidification of Tumor at Stromal Boundaries Drives Transcriptome Alterations Associated with Aggressive Phenotypes. Cancer Research 2019, 79, 1952–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aldini, G.; Altomare, A.; Baron, G.; Vistoli, G.; Carini, M.; Borsani, L.; Sergio, F. N-Acetylcysteine as an Antioxidant and Disulphide Breaking Agent: The Reasons Why. Free Radical Research 2018, 52, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. LoPachin, R.M.; Gavin, T. Reactions of Electrophiles with Nucleophilic Thiolate Sites: Relevance to Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Remediation. Free Radical Research 2016, 50, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. d’Oliveira, G.D.C.; Custodio, J.M.F.; Moura, A.F.; Napolitano, H.B.; Pérez, C.N.; Moraes, M.O.; Prókai, L.; Perjési, P. Different Reactivity to Glutathione but Similar Tumor Celltoxicity of Chalcones and Their Quinolinone Analogues. Medicinal Chemistry Research 2019, 28, 1448–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Perjési, P.; Linnanto, J.; Kolehmainen, E.; Ősz, E.; Virtanen, E. E-2-Benzylidenebenzocycloalkanones. IV. Studies on Transmission of Substituent Effects on 13C NMR Chemical Shifts of E-2-(X-Benzylidene)-1-Tetralones, and -Benzosuberones. Comparison with the 13C NMR Data of Chalcones and E-2-(X-Benzylidene)-1-Indanones. Journal of Molecular Structure 2005, 740, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Amslinger, S. The Tunable Functionality of α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds Enables Their Differential Application in Biological Systems. ChemMedChem 2010, 5, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Amslinger, S.; Al-Rifai, N.; Winter, K.; Wörmann, K.; Scholz, R.; Baumeister, P.; Wild, M. Reactivity Assessment of Chalcones by a Kinetic Thiol Assay. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Al-Rifai, N.; Rücker, H.; Amslinger, S. Opening or Closing the Lock? When Reactivity Is the Key to Biological Activity. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 15384–15395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Armstrong, R.N. Glutathione S-Transferases: Reaction Mechanism, Structure, and Function. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1991, 4, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. LoPachin, R.M.; Gavin, T.; DeCaprio, A.; Barber, D.S. Application of the Hard and Soft, Acids and Bases (HSAB) Theory to Toxicant–Target Interactions. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012, 25, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Perjési, P.; Nusser, T.; Tarczay, Gy.; Sohár, P. E-2-Benzylidenebenzocycloalkanones. Stereostructure and NMR Spectroscopic Investigation. Journal of Molecular Structure 1999, 479, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Physical Review 1964, 136, B864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kohn, W.; Sham, L.J. Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Physical Review 1965, 140, A1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Frisch, M.; Trucks, G.; Schlegel, H.; Scuseria, G.; Robb, M.; Cheeseman, J.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.; Nakatsuji, H. Gaussian 16 Revision C. 01. 2016; Gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT 2016, 421. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D.G. The M06 Suite of Density Functionals for Main Group Thermochemistry, Thermochemical Kinetics, Non-covalent Interactions, Excited States, and Transition Elements: Two New Functionals and Systematic Testing of Four M06-Class Functionals and 12 Other Functionals. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 2008, 120, 215–241. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang, G.; Musgrave, C.B. Comparison of DFT Methods for Molecular Orbital Eigenvalue Calculations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2007, 111, 1554–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Weiner, P.K.; Langridge, R.; Blaney, J.M.; Schaefer, R.; Kollman, P.A. Electrostatic Potential Molecular Surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1982, 79, 3754–3758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Naray-Szabo, G.; Ferenczy, G.G. Molecular Electrostatics. Chemical Reviews 1995, 95, 829–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fukui, K. The Role of Frontier Orbitals in Chemical Reactions (Nobel Lecture). Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English 1982, 21, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fukui, K. Role of Frontier Orbitals in Chemical Reactions. Science 1982, 218, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lu, T. Multiwfn. Software Manual. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sanches-Neto, F.O.; Dias-Silva, J.R.; Keng Queiroz Junior, L.H.; Carvalho-Silva, V.H. "Py SiRC": Machine Learning Combined with Molecular Fingerprints to Predict the Reaction Rate Constant of the Radical-Based Oxidation Processes of Aqueous Organic Contaminants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 12437–12448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kozurkova, M.; Tomeckova, V. V. Interaction of Chalcone Derivatives with Important Biomacromolecules. In Chalcones and Their Synthetic Analogs; Nova Science Publisher: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 95–133. ISBN 978-1-5361-8709-0. [Google Scholar]
Preprints 71455 g002
Figure 2. Change in the chromatographic peak area of chalcones IIb and IIc in the chalcone-GSH incubations at pH 8.0/7.4.
Figure 2. Change in the chromatographic peak area of chalcones IIb and IIc in the chalcone-GSH incubations at pH 8.0/7.4.
Preprints 71455 g002
Preprints 71455 g003
Figure 3. Change in the chromatographic peak area of chalcones IIb and IIc in the chalcone–NAC incubations at pH 8.0/7.4.
Figure 3. Change in the chromatographic peak area of chalcones IIb and IIc in the chalcone–NAC incubations at pH 8.0/7.4.
Preprints 71455 g003
Preprints 71455 g008
Figure 8. Change in the chromatographic peak area of chalcones IIb and IIc in the chalcone–GSH incubations at pH 6.3/6.8.
Figure 8. Change in the chromatographic peak area of chalcones IIb and IIc in the chalcone–GSH incubations at pH 6.3/6.8.
Preprints 71455 g008
Preprints 71455 g009
Figure 9. Change in the chromatographic peak area of chalcones IIb and IIc in the chalcone–NAC incubations at pH 6.3/6.8.
Figure 9. Change in the chromatographic peak area of chalcones IIb and IIc in the chalcone–NAC incubations at pH 6.3/6.8.
Preprints 71455 g009
Preprints 71455 g010
Figure 10. HOMO and LUMO plots for Ia, IIa CH3SH, and CH3S- calculated at the M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory.
Figure 10. HOMO and LUMO plots for Ia, IIa CH3SH, and CH3S- calculated at the M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory.
Preprints 71455 g010
Preprints 71455 g011
Figure 11. Isosurfaces of the Fukui f + Function, calculated at a proper value of 0.08 for the molecules Ia, IIa, CH3SH, and CH3S-.
Figure 11. Isosurfaces of the Fukui f + Function, calculated at a proper value of 0.08 for the molecules Ia, IIa, CH3SH, and CH3S-.
Preprints 71455 g011
Preprints 71455 g012
Figure 12. MEP surface contour of the total SCF electronic density for molecules Ia, IIa, CH3SH, and CH3S- at the M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory.
Figure 12. MEP surface contour of the total SCF electronic density for molecules Ia, IIa, CH3SH, and CH3S- at the M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory.
Preprints 71455 g012
Table 4. HPLC-UV areas of the (Z) isomers and the diastereomeric NAC-1 and NAC-2 peaks in the NAC-incubation of IIb and IIc under slightly acidic (pH 6.3/6.7) conditions.
Table 4. HPLC-UV areas of the (Z) isomers and the diastereomeric NAC-1 and NAC-2 peaks in the NAC-incubation of IIb and IIc under slightly acidic (pH 6.3/6.7) conditions.
Compound Time
(minute)		 Area
Z-Chalcone 		Area
NAC-1		 Area
NAC-2		 Ratio
Area NAC-2/NAC-1
IIb 75 91.8 35.3 224.1 6.3
165 107.2 52.7 349.7 6.6
255 114.9 56.8 448.3 7.9
315 118.9 60.0 513.9 8.6
IIc 75 136.5 54.0 148.9 2.8
165 159.4 59.5 249.3 4.2
255 175.3 58.4 333.2 5.7
315 184.5 61.8 392.1 6.3
Table 5. Reactivity indices were obtained for Ia, IIa, CH3SH, and CH3S- at the M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory.
Table 5. Reactivity indices were obtained for Ia, IIa, CH3SH, and CH3S- at the M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory.
Descriptors Ia
kcal.mol-1 		IIa
kcal.mol-1 		CH3SH
kcal.mol-1 		CH3S-
kcal.mol-1
EHOMO -183.24 -180.38 -183.240 -173.453
ELUMO -35.98 -28.44 -2.979 77.998
ΔEHOMO-LUMO 147.27 151.94 180.261 251.451
Chemical Potential ( μ ) -109.608 -104.405 -93.109 -47.728
Chemical Hardness ( η ) 147.264 151.930 180.261 251.451
Electrophilicity Index ( ω ) 40.791 35.873 24.047 4.530
Table 6. Percent reduction of initial chalcone HPLC-UV peaks in the 315-minute GSH and NAC incubation mixtures of the series I and II.
Table 6. Percent reduction of initial chalcone HPLC-UV peaks in the 315-minute GSH and NAC incubation mixtures of the series I and II.
Compound pH Reagent thiol Reduction of initial peak area at the 315 min timepoint (%) Reagent thiol Reduction of initial peak area at the 315 min timepoint (%)
Ib 8.0/7.4 GSH 96.3* NAC 94.8*
IIb 8.0/7.4 GSH 43.5 NAC 7.6
Ic 8.0/7.4 GSH 92.1* NAC 90.2*
IIc 8.0/7.4 GSH 26.3 NAC 7.9
Ib 6.3/6.7 GSH 90.6* NAC 75.6*
IIb 6.3/6.7 GSH 16.1 NAC 7.1
Ic 6.3/6.7 GSH 78.3* NAC 53.3*
IIc 6.3/6.7 GSH 9.1 NAC 9.0
Ib 3.2/3.7 GSH 19.3* NAC 10.9*
IIb 3.2/3.7 GSH 10.6 NAC 23.7
Ic 3.2/3.7 GSH 4.2* NAC 1.5*
IIc 3.2/3.7 GSH 5.3 NAC 12.1
*Calculated on the bases of data published in [24].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated