1. Introduction
Ascorbic acid (AA) is a vital biomolecule that is present in a variety of naturally occurring sources, including fruits and vegetables, and functions as a nutrient and antioxidant [
1]. It is essential to numerous bodily metabolic activities including activating the immune system, aiding in wound healing, helping with the absorption of iron, and protecting against damage to bones and teeth [
2]. Additionally, AA serves as a cofactor during the synthesis of collagen and carnitine [
3]. In addition, AA has been demonstrated to provide protective effects against oxidative illnesses like heart disease, several cancers, AIDS, the common cold, etc. [
4]. However, there is no AA produced by the human body and it can only be obtained through the consumption of foods and medicines [
5]. AA is a crucial ingredient in dietary and pharmaceutical supplements [
6]. Human blood serum typically contains between 28.5 and 85.2 µM of AA, and the amount of AA in blood serum can provide information about a person's general state of health [
7]. Scurvy and anemia can result from an AA deficit in blood serum, while an excess of AA can lead to gastric irritation or diarrhea [
8]. Therefore, it is crucial to have precise and efficient techniques for figuring out how much AA is present in foods, medications, and blood serum.
Direct titration [
9], chromatography [
10], spectrophotometry [
11], and solid-phase spectrophotometry [
12] are currently used methods for AA measurement. However, such methods are costly and require skilled personnel as well as challenging analytical measures for multi-sample preparation. Such techniques also require challenging analytical measures in multiple-sample preparations. To address these issues, researchers are working to develop efficient and cost-effective methods for real-time and in-situ AA determination. The advantages of electrochemical detection include quicker measurements, reduced sample size, reduced costs, and an absence of pre-concentration processes, making them handy, portable, and simple to use with miniaturized electrodes [
13]. However, due to its irreversible nature and high over-potential requirements, the electrochemical AA oxidation at a bare electrode might have negative effects on selectivity, electrode fouling, and repeatability. Therefore, it is indispensable to fabricate an electrode surface that enables efficient AA detection with less over-potential. In recent years, to detect AA, researchers have proposed several sensors including electrodes modified with metals and metal oxides [
14], alkylimidazolium salt [
15], graphene derivatives [
16], carbon nanotubes [
14], and polymers [
17].
Due to their potential technological uses and intriguing optical and structural characteristics, semiconducting doped nanostructured materials comprised of transition metal oxides have drawn a lot of attention. Because of their size, shape, and surface, these materials have distinct physical and chemical properties that make them relevant in a variety of study fields and applications for industry. In particular, metal oxide-based sensors have been explored for their diverse uses in areas such as the protection of the environment, chemical process management, personal security, healthcare, and military [
18,
19,
20]. These sensors have several advantages, including their compact size, affordable price, less power consumption, straightforward processing, and good stability [
21]. Previous researchers have investigated various types of metal oxides, such as CuO [
22,
23], MnO
2 [
24], NiO [
25], Fe
2O
3 [
26], and ZnO [
27], as electron mediators for sensing applications. Additionally, doped metal oxides such as NiO.CoO nanocomposites [
28], CdO.SnO
2.V
2O
5 [
29], CuO.In
2O
3 [
30], CuO.Nd
2O
5 [
31], CuO.NiO [
32], CuO.ZnO [
33] have been studied as efficient sensing materials with higher sensitivity, small detection limits, wide linear dynamic ranges, and quick response times. CuO, a
p-type semiconductor, has shown particularly good performance as an electrocatalyst in sensing applications [
34]. To improve the performance of CuO, researchers have also investigated using other semiconductor metal oxides such as In
2O
3 [
30], Nd
2O
5 [
31], NiO [
32], TiO
2 [
35], SnO
2 [
36] in combination with CuO as bimetallic oxide pairs. Yb
2O
3 has also been explored for use in sensing applications [
37,
38,
39,
40].
A lot of research has been done on the applicability of carbonaceous nanomaterials for sensing applications, including reduced graphene oxide, activated carbon, mesoporous carbon, and carbon nanotubes. In particular, graphene, a sheet of sp
2-bonded carbon atoms, with a particular surface area, low density, outstanding electrical conductivity, and great mechanical properties, has drawn a lot of interest [
41,
42]. Graphene-based 3D nanomaterials have also generated huge interest due to their high surface area, lower density, better electrical conductivity, and exceptional mechanical properties [
43,
44]. Composite materials made of metal oxides and graphene have recently been explored for their stability, long-term storage, and photo-catalytic capabilities [
45,
46]. Many graphene based nanomaterials have been studied in sensing applications [
47,
48,
49]. However, rare earth oxide-transition metal oxide-reduced graphene nanocomposite has hardly been studied in sensing applications. Hence, in this work, we developed and examined Yb
2O
3.CuO@rGO nanocomposite as the active sensing material for AA detection.
Inspired by previous works available in the literature, we synthesized Yb2O3-doped CuO nanoparticles to improve stability, sensitivity, and selectivity, and then used a simple sonication technique to synthesize the Yb2O3.CuO@rGO nanocomposite sensing material. This study presents a simple method for preparing an electrochemical AA sensor using Yb2O3.CuO@rGO nanocomposite that offered improved selectivity and sensitivity. To the extent that we are aware, this will be the maiden article utilizing Yb2O3.CuO@rGO nanocomposite to develop an enzymeless AA electrochemical sensor.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
All of the necessary chemicals, including ascorbic acid, copper (II) nitrate, ytterbium (III) nitrate, sodium hydroxide, reduced graphene oxide, NaH2PO4, Na2HPO4, citric acid, glucose, uric acid, dopamine, sodium chloride, and calcium nitrate, were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and utilized exactly as they were given. All solutions were made using double-distilled water. The XPS investigation of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO was performed using a MgKα spectrometer (JEOL, JPS 9200) in the subsequent circumstances: pass energy = 50 eV (wide-scan) and 30 eV (narrow-scan), Voltage = 10 kV, Current = 20 mA. A PANalytical X-ray diffractometer was used to acquire X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra with Cu Kα1/2, λα1 = 154.060 p.m., λα2 = 154.439 p.m. radiation. A "Raman station 400 (Perkin Elmer)" spectrometer was used to acquire the Raman spectra. A FE-SEM (JEOL-6300F, 5 kV) was used to analyze the morphology and structural characteristics of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO. EDS (JEOL, Japan) was used to investigate the elemental composition of the Yb2O3.CuO@rGO. A JEOL JEM-2100F-UHR field emission apparatus fitted with a Gatan GIF 2001 energy filter and a 1 k-CCD camera was used to capture Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs at 200 kV. Electrochemical measurements were conducted using a Zahner Zennium potentiostat (German).
2.2. Synthesis of CuO, Yb2O3, Yb2O3.CuO, and Yb2O3.CuO@rGO nanocomposite
To synthesize the CuO, Yb
2O
3, Yb
2O
3.CuO, and Yb
2O
3.CuO@rGO nanocomposites, the following process was followed: First, equimolar Cu(NO
3)
2 and Yb(NO
3)
3 solutions were mixed in a beaker and stirred for half an hour at 70°C. This mixture was then combined with NaOH and stirred vigorously at 80°C for 8 hours. Afterwards the ensuing dark precipitate was cleaned with distilled water and ethanol to get rid of contaminants and the resulting black precipitate was dried at 80°C. This as-grown Yb
2O
3.CuO nanoparticle (NP) was then calcined by heating it for six hours at 500°C in a furnace. During this synthesis process, the following chemical reactions occurred:
Precursors, Yb3+ and Cu2+ ions are soluble in NaOH solution, where NaOH keeps the pH constant during the reaction and continuously releases OH-. The development of the Cu(OH)2 nucleus starts when the ionic product of Cu2+ and OH- exceeds the Ksp value. Similarly, Yb(OH)3 was also produced. Cu2+ ions easily incorporate themselves into the Yb2O3 lattice because of the similar ionic radii. On heating, hydroxides decompose to produce respective oxides. Similarly CuO and Yb2O3 NPs were also synthesized.
To synthesize the Yb2O3.CuO@rGO nanocomposite, 0.5 g Yb2O3.CuO NPs and 0.025 g reduced graphene oxide (rGO) were mixed followed by 40 minutes of sonication in 80 ml distilled water. This resulting mixture was then filtered and had 12 hours of drying in an oven at 70°C.
2.3. GCE modification using Yb2O3.CuO@rGO nanocomposite
GCEs were first cleaned by using a 1 µm diamond and then a 0.05 µm alumina. Next, the GCE was fabricated utilizing Yb2O3.CuO@rGO nanocomposite using a Nafion solution. During the fabrication process, 4.0 mg of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO was uniformly mixed with 0.05 ml Nafion and 0.45 ml propan-2-ol, and then 2 µl of this suspension was carefully applied to a pre-cleaned GCE and dried at 60°C for 20 minutes. Such a fabricated GCE was labeled as the Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE. Control experiments were also conducted, in which CuO/GCE, Yb2O3/GCE, rGO/GCE, and Yb2O3.CuO/GCE were fabricated using similar procedures. The electrochemical investigations of AA (0.5 – 1744 µM) were carried out in a typical three-electrode electrochemical cell at ambient conditions in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0), a Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE, Ag/AgCl, and a platinum spiral were served as the working, reference, and counter electrodes, respectively.
Figure 1.
(a) Survey XPS spectrum of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO NC, (b) Deconvoluted spectra of Yb4d, (c) Cu2p, (d) O1s, and (e) C1s of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO nanocomposite.
Figure 1.
(a) Survey XPS spectrum of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO NC, (b) Deconvoluted spectra of Yb4d, (c) Cu2p, (d) O1s, and (e) C1s of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO nanocomposite.
Figure 2.
(a) XRD patterns and (b) Raman spectra of CuO, Yb2O3, and Yb2O3.CuO@rGO NC.
Figure 2.
(a) XRD patterns and (b) Raman spectra of CuO, Yb2O3, and Yb2O3.CuO@rGO NC.
Figure 3.
FESEM image: (a) CuO, (b) Yb2O3, (c) Yb2O3.CuO, (d) Yb2O3.CuO@rGO, (e) EDS spectrum of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO; TEM micrograph from (f) CuO, (g) Yb2O3, (h) Yb2O3.CuO, (i) Yb2O3.CuO@rGO; (j) HR-TEM image, and (k) SAED patterns of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO nanocomposite.
Figure 3.
FESEM image: (a) CuO, (b) Yb2O3, (c) Yb2O3.CuO, (d) Yb2O3.CuO@rGO, (e) EDS spectrum of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO; TEM micrograph from (f) CuO, (g) Yb2O3, (h) Yb2O3.CuO, (i) Yb2O3.CuO@rGO; (j) HR-TEM image, and (k) SAED patterns of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO nanocomposite.
Figure 4.
CVs recorded at scan rate 0.05 Vs-1 in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0) (a) CVs from bare GCE, CuO/GCE, Yb2O3/GCE, rGO/GCE , Yb2O3.CuO/GCE, Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE with 40 µM AA, (b) CVs from the Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE with 40 µM AA and without AA, and (c) EIS Nyquist plots acquired using various electrodes in 1.0 mM [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- in 0.1 M KCl at +0.50 V, at signal amplitude 10 mV and frequency ranging from 0.1 Hz to 100 KHz with a relevant equivalent circuit in the inset.
Figure 4.
CVs recorded at scan rate 0.05 Vs-1 in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0) (a) CVs from bare GCE, CuO/GCE, Yb2O3/GCE, rGO/GCE , Yb2O3.CuO/GCE, Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE with 40 µM AA, (b) CVs from the Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE with 40 µM AA and without AA, and (c) EIS Nyquist plots acquired using various electrodes in 1.0 mM [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- in 0.1 M KCl at +0.50 V, at signal amplitude 10 mV and frequency ranging from 0.1 Hz to 100 KHz with a relevant equivalent circuit in the inset.
Figure 5.
(a) CVs recorded using 40 µM AA in 0.1 M PBS at varying pH (6.0 – 8.0) at 0.05 Vs-1 scan rate, (b) Ipa vs. pH, and (c) Epa vs. pH.
Figure 5.
(a) CVs recorded using 40 µM AA in 0.1 M PBS at varying pH (6.0 – 8.0) at 0.05 Vs-1 scan rate, (b) Ipa vs. pH, and (c) Epa vs. pH.
Figure 6.
Investigation of scan rate effect of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE sensor: (a) CVs recorded at different scan rates (20 - 200 mVs-1) with 40 µM AA in 0.1 M PBS (b) Ipa vs. ʋ, (c) Ipa vs. , (d) log(Ipa) vs log(ʋ), and (e) Epa vs. log(ʋ).
Figure 6.
Investigation of scan rate effect of Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE sensor: (a) CVs recorded at different scan rates (20 - 200 mVs-1) with 40 µM AA in 0.1 M PBS (b) Ipa vs. ʋ, (c) Ipa vs. , (d) log(Ipa) vs log(ʋ), and (e) Epa vs. log(ʋ).
Figure 7.
(a) Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE sensor's amperometric response for AA (0.5 - 1744 M) at +0.3 V potential, and (b) related calibration plot.
Figure 7.
(a) Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE sensor's amperometric response for AA (0.5 - 1744 M) at +0.3 V potential, and (b) related calibration plot.
Figure 8.
(a) Amperometric (i-t) response at +0.3 V from Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE sensor upon successive additions of 90 µM of AA, UA, Glc, CA, DA, Cl-, NO3- and AA, (b) repeatability, (c) reproducibility, and (d) stability investigations.
Figure 8.
(a) Amperometric (i-t) response at +0.3 V from Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE sensor upon successive additions of 90 µM of AA, UA, Glc, CA, DA, Cl-, NO3- and AA, (b) repeatability, (c) reproducibility, and (d) stability investigations.
Scheme 1.
Schematic representation for Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE-based ascorbic acid sensor.
Scheme 1.
Schematic representation for Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE-based ascorbic acid sensor.
Table 1.
Comparative ascorbic acid sensor performance employing various electrodes.
Table 1.
Comparative ascorbic acid sensor performance employing various electrodes.
Electrode |
Technique |
LDR/ μM |
LOD/ µM |
Sensitivity/ μAμM-1cm-2
|
Applied potential/V |
Ref. |
PSi-MC/GCE |
Amp |
0.5–2473 |
0.03 |
0.1982 |
+0.7 |
[13] |
Poly(Py-oPD)/PGE |
SWV |
1-1000 |
0.026 |
- |
- |
[17] |
GO-IL/GCE |
Amp |
10-4000 |
3.33 |
- |
+0.8 |
[39] |
DMA/GCE |
Amp |
25-1650 |
- |
0.178 |
+0.35 |
[65] |
PoPDoAP/GCE |
DPV |
100-1000 |
36.4 |
0.0306 μAμM-1
|
- |
[66] |
NFG/Ag/PANI |
Amp |
10-11460 |
8.0 |
- |
+1.2 |
[67] |
PG/GCE |
Amp |
9.0-2314 |
6.45 |
0.0667 μAμM-1
|
-0.01 |
[68] |
ZnO/GCE |
Amp |
1-800 |
0.27 |
0.1156 μAμM-1
|
+0.36 |
[69] |
ERGO/GCE |
DPV |
500-2000 |
150 |
0.0054 μAμM-1
|
- |
[70] |
PMES/RGO/GCE |
DPV |
30-100 |
0.43 |
- |
- |
[71] |
NPG |
Amp |
10-1100 |
2.0 |
0.0021 μAμM-1
|
+0.3 |
[72] |
GCE/Au@Pd-RGO |
DPV |
0.01–100 |
0.002 |
- |
- |
[73] |
Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE |
Amp |
0.5–1571 |
0.062 |
0.4341 |
+0.25 |
This work |
Table 2.
AA Detection from commercial vitamin C tablets and blood serums (BS1 & BS2) using the Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE sensor.
Table 2.
AA Detection from commercial vitamin C tablets and blood serums (BS1 & BS2) using the Yb2O3.CuO@rGO/GCE sensor.
Real samples |
Added std. AA (µM) |
Total AA measured (µM) |
AA measured in real samples (µM) |
Recovery (%) |
RSD (%) (n = 3) |
BS1 |
48.8 |
96.2 |
46.2 |
102.4 |
4.52 |
97.6 |
147.4 |
103.7 |
BS2 |
48.8 |
88.1 |
36.5 |
105.7 |
4.13 |
97.6 |
137.0 |
103.0 |
Vit-C |
98.0 |
176.6 |
82.4 |
96.1 |
4.37 |
194.2 |
271.1 |
97.2 |