Preprint
Brief Report

The Putative Neurotransmitter Transporter Blot Regulates F-actin Organization in Drosophila

Altmetrics

Downloads

155

Views

46

Comments

0

  # These authors contribute equally.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

26 April 2023

Posted:

29 April 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Solute carrier (SLC) proteins transport a wide range of substrates across biological membranes and more than 400 proteins are considered as SLCs based on its sequence. Despite it has important potential applications in drug development, the SLC superfamily is still understudied. Drosophila blot, an orphan SLC protein, regulates F-actin organization in the syncytial blastoderm and the Malpighian tubules. However, the molecular mechanism was unknown. In this study, we found Blot was localized at the furrow canal, the front of the invaginating membrane during cellularization process. Blot is required for maintaining proper morphology of furrow canal and cellularization process. By affinity purification and mass spectrometry we identified RhoGEF ELMO/DOCK complex was required for Blot-mediated F-actin organization and cellularization. Further analysis revealed that ELMO localization depends on Blot. Taken together, we propose Blot plays a role in F-actin organization as an upstream factor of ELMO by recruiting ELMO to the target membrane compartments.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Cell and Developmental Biology
# These authors contribute equally.

1. Introduction

The Solute carrier (SLC) transporters comprise a superfamily of hundreds of trans-membrane proteins that facilitate the transport of a variety of molecules including sugars, amino acids, and external chemicals such as drugs across membranes by using the ionic gradient [1,2]. Although the relevance for drug development is increasingly being recognized, the SLC transporters are highly understudied, and at least 30% are still considered entirely orphans in terms of knowledge of their substrate and biological function [3].
bloated tubules (blot) was identified as an orphan SLC involved in cortical F-actin organization of Malpighian tubules and early embryos of Drosophila melanogaster [4]. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that blot belonged to SLC6, which was characterized as a family of Na+ and Cl- dependent neurotransmitter transporters [4,5]. It has been proposed that the substrate transported by Blot is required for F-actin polymerization[4]. Nevertheless, such substrate has not been determined yet.
In the first 2 hours, Drosophila embryo develops as a syncytial blastoderm. After 13 continuous nuclear division, cellularization occurs at the interphase of cycle 14, converting the one-cell syncytium to a multicellular blastoderm. The process of cellularization is well documented [6]. Briefly, the plasma membranes between adjacent nuclei invaginate, and the membranes at the invaginating front form furrow canals, where F-actin and its associated proteins such as myosin, anillin are enriched. At the end of cellularization, furrow canals widen, and fuse with the neighbors, enclosing the individual nuclei.
The successful initiation and progression of cellularization depend on the tight regulation of F-actin. Maternally depleting F-actin regulator, such as Dia [7,8,9], Arp2/3 [10], Scar [11], and Slam [12,13], results in the failure of cellularization. In this study, we uncovered Blot was required during cellularization, and localized at the membrane with the enrichment at furrow canals. Further, we identified a Blot-binding partner, the unconventional RhoGEF ELMO/DOCK, which is required for Blot-mediated F-actin organization and cellularization. We observed that Malpighian tubules were widened in the absence of ELMO, resembling the reported blot phenotype [4]. Blot and ELMO interact physically, and colocalize at the furrow canal in cellularizing embryo. Moreover, we found that localization of ELMO depended on Blot. Our study thus reveals that instead of being a neurotransmitter transporter, Blot regulates F-actin organization by recruiting ELMO to the cell membrane during development.

2. Results

Cellularization in Drosophila embryogenesis is an ideal model to investigate the interaction between cell membrane and F-actin [6]. The invaginating membranes between adjacent nuclei and the cortical F-actin collectively enclose the nuclei and form the monolayer epithelial cells (Figure 1A).
To determine whether Blot is involved in cellularization, we recorded the embryonic development of the embryos from females with germline clones of blot (hereafter called blot embryo) using differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope (Figure 1B). The front of membrane invagination is visible in DIC as indicated by yellow arrowhead. The membranes invaginated to 45 µm in 36 min in wildtype embryo, whereas the cellularization process was delayed dramatically, albeit the furrow canals were visible in blot embryo. Next, we fixed and immuno-stained for Slam, which localizes at furrow canal exclusively. A large population of the embryos showed the incomplete cellularization (Figure 1C, arrowhead). We also noticed that the furrow canals in blot embryo were wider (Figure 1D, arrowhead). Further, we utilized two independent RNAi lines against blot, crossing with 67,15-Gal4, a maternal Gal4 line, to reduce the blot gene expression level. We observed a consistent phenotype in RNAi embryos as in blot germline clone embryos using DIC and immuno-staining (Supp. Figure), confirming that Blot is necessary for cellularization.
To further study the function of Blot, we generated transgenic flies expressing Blot-GFP under the control of UAS. Surprisingly, overexpression of Blot maternally induced embryonic lethality. DIC recordings revealed that the cellularization process was disrupted, similar with the one in blot germline clone embryos. A small fraction of the embryos overexpressing Blot-GFP remained normal structure. In such embryos, we found Blot-GFP localized along the plasma membrane with an enrichment at furrow canal during cellularization, overlapped with F-actin distribution (Figure 1E).
Our data, together with previous study[4], imply that Blot is involved in F-actin organization. Blot belongs to SLC6 family, which transports neurotransmitter and amino acids. How is a transporter protein required for F-actin organization? To address this question, we performed GFP pulldown– mass spectrometry experiments using the lysates from embryos overexpressing Blot-GFP as a bait (Figure 2A). On the list of the binding partners, ELMO is of particular interest since it is a subunit of an unconventional RhoGEF ELMO/DOCK180 complex [14,15]. We purified a fragment of ELMO (aa240–aa480) and immunized mouse to generate the polyclonal antibodies. Interestingly, ELMO was found enriched at the furrow canals by immunostaining, sharing a similar subcellular localization to Blot (Figure 2B).
To test whether ELMO and Blot binds directly, we preformed GFP-pulldown assay using HEK293 cells co-transfected Blot-HA and ELMO-GFP. However, only a very small fraction of cells was able to express Blot after transfection, making it difficult to detect by western blot. To circumvent this problem, we transfected the soluble fractions of Blot, i.e., N- and C-terminal regions rather than the full-length which contains 12 transmembrane regions to the HEK293 cells. Following expression of ELMO-GFP and Blot-N/C-HA in HEK293 cells and immunoprecipitation with GFP antibodies, Blot-N and -C terminal cytoplasmic domains were detected in the bound fraction (Figure 2C). To confirm the interaction of Blot and ELMO is specific, we co-transfected the transcriptional factor E2F3-HA and ELMO-GFP and precipitated by GFP-nanobodies. In the bound fraction, we could not detect E2F3 (Figure 2D), implying a specific interaction of Blot and ELMO.
ELMO is required for proper cortical F-actin formation [16] and adherens junction assembly [15]. We asked whether ELMO was also required for cellularization. DIC time lapse images from ELMO germline clone embryos showed that the membrane invagination was impaired dramatically, which is reminiscent of blot embryos (Figure 2E).
Next, we checked the localization of ELMO in blot embryo. Strikingly, furrow canal localization of ELMO was disappeared in the absence of Blot, albeit the furrow canal structure was present in blot embryos as Slam signal indicated (Figure 2F).
Based on our data, we propose that Blot functions as an F-actin regulator by recruiting RhoGEF ELMO/DOCK180 complex to the membrane, rather than transporting unknown substrates as a neurotransmitter transporter. We then asked whether this was true in other contexts. It has been reported that the Malpighian tubules display bloated appearance in blot mutant larvae [4]. We dissected the Malpighian tubules from ELMO heterozygous third instar larvae, since the homozygote cannot develop to larvae stage. The morphology of the ELMO Malpighian tubules was indistinguishable from the one of blot, and both were wider than wildtype (Figure 2G and H), implying that Blot regulates F-actin via recruiting ELMO is not restricted to the cellularization process.

3. Discussion

SLC proteins transport sugars, proteins, metabolic waste, and neurotransmitters, playing an important role in homeostatic control, making them being often considered to be therapeutic targets in the field of drug development. However, SLCs are relatively understudied compared to other gene families with similar status[3,17].
In this study, we investigated the biological function of an orphan SLC, Blot, during Drosophila embryo cellularization process. blot was identified as a novel gene expressing in the Malpighian tubules by P-element enhancer trap [4]. The Malpighian tubules are wider in the absence of blot (hence the name bloated tubules) and the cortical F-actin is ill-structured in blot embryo [4]. Blot is clustered in SLC6 family based on its sequence [4,5]. It was proposed that the potential molecules transported by Blot was vital for F-actin polymerization [4]. Nevertheless, no substrate of Blot has been identified yet. Blot contains relative larger cytoplasmic domains compared to other members in SLC6 family [5], which provides potential sites for post-translational modification and interaction with other proteins.
By GFP-pulldown and mass spectrometry we identified that ELMO bound Blot in Drosophila embryo lysate. ELMO was first identified in C.elegans as an essential gene for engulfment of the apoptotic cells with the name of ced-12 [18]. Molecular cloning and characterization showed Ced-12 functioned as an upstream factor of Ced-10, Rac in C.elegans [19]. At the same time, the homolog of ced-12 in human was identified, and renamed as ELMO (engulfment and cell motility) [20]. ELMO has no intrinsic catalytic activity and instead binds to DOCK180, forming a functional complex with RhoGEF activity [21,22]. It has been reported that ELMO and Sponge (the ortholog of DOCK180 in Drosophila) are essential for cortical F-actin organization in syncytial blastoderm [16,23]. Although PH domain of ELMO might be involved in the interaction with phosphatidylinositol lipids, the experiments in C.elengas have shown that PH domain is not sufficient for its membrane localization [19]. How ELMO/Sponge complex is activated or recruited remained unknown.
Unexpectedly, we uncovered the transmembrane protein Blot recruited ELMO to the membrane. Blot binds to ELMO physically via its N- and C-terminal cytoplasmic regions. ELMO is not able to localize at the furrow canal when Blot is depleted.
We propose Blot plays a role in F-actin organization as an upstream factor of ELMO by recruiting ELMO to the target membrane compartments. Yet we were not able to exclude the contribution of transport activities from Blot, which needs to be further investigations.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Drosophila Genetics

Flies were kept at 25 °C under standard conditions. The following fly lines were used:
Drosophila genotype Resource or Reference
y w maintained in the lab
blot[MI05046]/TM3 BDSC: 38188
w; ELMO[367]/CyO [15]
67,15-Gal4 maintained in the lab
hs-flp; ovoD[3L] Frt3L/TM3 maintained in the lab
hs-flp; ovoD[2L] Frt2L/CyO maintained in the lab
vas-int; attPZH-86Fb BDSC: 24749
UASp-blot-GFP/TM3, Sb made in this study
To get the blot germline clone females, blot[MI05046]/TM3 was recombined with Frt3L, crossed with hs-flp; ovoD[3L] Frt3L/TM3, then the F1 larvae were heat shocked at 37℃ for 2 h in two consecutive days. The eggs from the blot[MI05046] Frt3L/ovoD[3L] Frt3L females were regarded as the eggs without Blot protein or its mRNA supplied maternally. ELMO germline clone females were obtained in the same way.
Genotypes by figure:
Figure 1B (upper panel), C (upper panel) and D (upper panel): y w
Figure 1B (lower panel), C (lower panel) and D (lower panel): embryos from blot[MI05046] Frt3L/ovoD[3L] Frt3L females
Figure 1E: embryos from 67-Gal4/+; 15-Gal4/UASp- blot-GFP females
Figure 2A: embryos from 67-Gal4/+; 15-Gal4/UASp- blot-GFP females
Figure 2B: y w
Figure 2E (upper panel), F (left panel) and G (left panel): y w
Figure 2E (lower panel): embryo from ELMO[367] Frt2L/ovoD[2L] Frt2L females
Figure 2F (left panel): embryos from blot[MI05046] Frt3L/ovoD[3L] Frt3L females
Figure 2G (middle panel): ELMO[367] /CyO
Figure 2G (right panel): blot[MI05046]/TM3
Supplementary figure: the embryos from 67-Gal4/+; 15-Gal4/ UAS-blot-RNAi

4.2. Antibody Generation

The ELMO antibody was generated in mice after immunization with a purified recombinant ELMO fragment (aa240–aa480) with 6xHis tag. The serum from each mouse was collected and tested by immnostaining.

4.3. DIC Live Imaging

The staged embryos were collected and dechorionated with 50% hypochlorite bleach for 90 s, washed thoroughly, aligned on coverslips, covered with halocarbon oil. DIC images were acquired on an inverted microscopy (ZEISS Axiovert 5) with a time interval of 1 min/frame. The Malpighian tubules were dissected from the third instar larvae. The debris were removed by rinsing the Malpighian tubules in PBS and the images were taken on an inverted microscopy (ZEISS Axiovert 5) as soon as possible. Images were edited using Fiji [24].

4.4. Histology and Microscopy

The dechorionated embryos were fixed by 4% formaldehyde in PBS/heptane for 20 min at room temperature. The vitelline membranes were manually removed. Fixed embryos were stained in PBST (PBS with 0.1% Tween-20) consecutively with primary antibodies, fluorescent secondary antibodies/ Phalloidin, DNA dyes and mounted in Aqua polymount (Polysciences). Antibodies against the following antigens were used: Slam (rabbit, 1:5000, gift from Grosshans lab), ELMO (mouse, 1:1000, made in this study). Secondary antibodies were labeled with Alexa dyes (Invitrogen, 5 μg/mL). Phalloidin-Alexa 555 (Invitrogen) stained F-actin. GFP was stained by a nanobody labeled with ATTO 488 dye (GFP-Booster, chromotek). DNA was stained by DAPI (Sigma).
Confocal images were acquired on ZEISS LSM 900, 63 oil objective (Carl Zeiss, ×63/oil, NA1.4). Images were edited using Fiji [24].

4.5. GFP-pulldown and mass spectrometry

2-4 hours aged embryos (0.1 gram, roughly 10,000 embryos) for each sample were collected. The genotypes of the fly females were yw (control) and 67-Gal4/+; 15-Gal4/UAS-Blot-GFP (Blot-GFP maternal overexpression). The embryos were dechorionated, weighted, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, transferred in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris/Cl pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; 0.5 mM EDTA; 0.5% NP-40, supplemented with protease inhibitor (Roche, 11697498001), 0.1 gram embryos in 1 mL lysis buffer) and crushed by Dounce homogenizer 5~10 times on ice. The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C to remove the debris. The clear supernatants were incubated with rinsed GFP-trap magnetic agarose resin (Chromotek, gtma) at 4°C for 2 hours, rinsed 3x and resuspended in 2x Laemmli buffer without bromophenol blue.
Protein samples were further purified on 12% SDS-PAGE and treated with in-gel trypsin digestion. Peptides were harvested analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) with a Q-Exactive Mass Spectrometer.
The spectra were searched against UniProt Drosophila melanogaster database by Mascot2.2 with the following parameter: Dynamical modifications: Oxidation (M); Fixed modifications: Carbamidomethyl (C); Max Missed Cleavages: 2; ProteomicsTools: 3.1.6; Filter by score ≥ 20

4.6. Cell culture, immunoprecipitation and Western blotting

HEK293T cells were cultured followed standard protocol. Lipo3000 liposome transfection system was used for transfection. The transfected cells were collected after 2 days transfection, and lysed in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris/Cl pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; 0.5 mM EDTA; 0.5% NP-40, supplemented with protease inhibitor (Roche, 11697498001). Co-immunoprecipitation was performed using GFP-trap magnetic beads (ChromoTek, gtma), following the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, the lysates were incubated with the rinsed GFP-trap beads at 4°C for 2 hours, rinsed 3x and resuspended in 2x Laemmli buffer. Protein sample were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, blotted to PVDF membranes by wet transfer (100 mA per mini gel, 3 hours). The PVDF membranes were blocked with 5% fat-free milk in PBST (PBS with 0.1% Tween-20), incubated with the primary antibodies [rabbit-anti-GFP (1:2000, 2956T, CST), rabbit-anti-HA (1:4000, 3724T, CST)] for 2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. After rinsed 3x15 min, the PVDF were incubated with the secondary antibody [Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (1:2000, HS101-01, TRANS)] for 1 hour, and detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Advansta, Menlo Park, CA, USA).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Y. and Z.L.; methodology, G.W., Z.Z, C.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Y.; writing—review and editing, Z.L.; supervision, Z.L.; funding acquisition, Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 32070786, the Young Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province, grant number qnts20191090155.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. Raw data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jörg Großhans for Slam antibodies; Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center for fly stocks; Bo Dong for supporting the HEK293 cell culture.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lin, L., et al., SLC transporters as therapeutic targets: emerging opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2015. 14(8): p. 543-60. [CrossRef]
  2. Colas, C., P.M. Ung, and A. Schlessinger, SLC Transporters: Structure, Function, and Drug Discovery. Medchemcomm, 2016. 7(6): p. 1069-1081. [CrossRef]
  3. Cesar-Razquin, A., et al., A Call for Systematic Research on Solute Carriers. Cell, 2015. 162(3): p. 478-87. [CrossRef]
  4. Johnson, K., E. Knust, and H. Skaer, bloated tubules (blot) encodes a Drosophila member of the neurotransmitter transporter family required for organisation of the apical cytocortex. Dev Biol, 1999. 212(2): p. 440-54.
  5. Thimgan, M.S., J.S. Berg, and A.E. Stuart, Comparative sequence analysis and tissue localization of members of the SLC6 family of transporters in adult Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol, 2006. 209(Pt 17): p. 3383-404. [CrossRef]
  6. Sokac, A.M., N. Biel, and S. De Renzis, Membrane-actin interactions in morphogenesis: Lessons learned from Drosophila cellularization. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2023. 133: p. 107-122. [CrossRef]
  7. Grosshans, J., et al., RhoGEF2 and the formin Dia control the formation of the furrow canal by directed actin assembly during Drosophila cellularisation. Development, 2005. 132(5): p. 1009-20.
  8. Afshar, K., B. Stuart, and S.A. Wasserman, Functional analysis of the Drosophila diaphanous FH protein in early embryonic development. Development, 2000. 127(9): p. 1887-97. [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, S., et al., The F-BAR protein Cip4/Toca-1 antagonizes the formin Diaphanous in membrane stabilization and compartmentalization. J Cell Sci, 2013. 126(Pt 8): p. 1796-805.
  10. Stevenson, V., et al., Arp2/3-dependent pseudocleavage [correction of psuedocleavage] furrow assembly in syncytial Drosophila embryos. Curr Biol, 2002. 12(9): p. 705-11.
  11. Zallen, J.A., et al., SCAR is a primary regulator of Arp2/3-dependent morphological events in Drosophila. J Cell Biol, 2002. 156(4): p. 689-701.
  12. Acharya, S., et al., Function and dynamics of slam in furrow formation in early Drosophila embryo. Dev Biol, 2014. 386(2): p. 371-84. [CrossRef]
  13. Lecuit, T., R. Samanta, and E. Wieschaus, slam encodes a developmental regulator of polarized membrane growth during cleavage of the Drosophila embryo. Dev Cell, 2002. 2(4): p. 425-36. [CrossRef]
  14. Geisbrecht, E.R., et al., Drosophila ELMO/CED-12 interacts with Myoblast city to direct myoblast fusion and ommatidial organization. Dev Biol, 2008. 314(1): p. 137-49. [CrossRef]
  15. Schmidt, A., Z. Lv, and J. Grosshans, ELMO and Sponge specify subapical restriction of Canoe and formation of the subapical domain in early Drosophila embryos. Development, 2018. 145(2). [CrossRef]
  16. Winkler, F., et al., Fluctuation Analysis of Centrosomes Reveals a Cortical Function of Kinesin-1. Biophys J, 2015. 109(5): p. 856-68. [CrossRef]
  17. Hediger, M.A., et al., The ABCs of membrane transporters in health and disease (SLC series): introduction. Mol Aspects Med, 2013. 34(2-3): p. 95-107. [CrossRef]
  18. Ellis, R.E., D.M. Jacobson, and H.R. Horvitz, Genes required for the engulfment of cell corpses during programmed cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 1991. 129(1): p. 79-94. [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, Z., et al., The C. elegans PH domain protein CED-12 regulates cytoskeletal reorganization via a Rho/Rac GTPase signaling pathway. Dev Cell, 2001. 1(4): p. 477-89. [CrossRef]
  20. Gumienny, T.L., et al., CED-12/ELMO, a novel member of the CrkII/Dock180/Rac pathway, is required for phagocytosis and cell migration. Cell, 2001. 107(1): p. 27-41.
  21. Cote, J.F. and K. Vuori, GEF what? Dock180 and related proteins help Rac to polarize cells in new ways. Trends Cell Biol, 2007. 17(8): p. 383-93. [CrossRef]
  22. Biersmith, B., et al., The DOCK protein sponge binds to ELMO and functions in Drosophila embryonic CNS development. PLoS One, 2011. 6(1): p. e16120. [CrossRef]
  23. Postner, M.A., K.G. Miller, and E.F. Wieschaus, Maternal effect mutations of the sponge locus affect actin cytoskeletal rearrangements in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. J Cell Biol, 1992. 119(5): p. 1205-18. [CrossRef]
  24. Schindelin, J., et al., Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods, 2012. 9(7): p. 676-82. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Blot is required for cellularization and localized at the tip of invaginating membrane. A. Schematic illustration of Drosophila embryo cellularization. B. The snapshots from time lapse DIC movies of wildtype and blot embryo. Yellow arrowheads show the furrow ingression front. The cellularization process is failed in blot embryo. C, D. Confocal images of cellularizing embryos. C is the cross-section in sagittal plane., and D is the top view of the embryo surface. Slam labels the furrow canal, representing the front of furrow. The yellow arrowheads show the defects during cellularization. E. confocal images show that Blot protein is colocalized with F-actin and enriched at the furrow canal.
Figure 1. Blot is required for cellularization and localized at the tip of invaginating membrane. A. Schematic illustration of Drosophila embryo cellularization. B. The snapshots from time lapse DIC movies of wildtype and blot embryo. Yellow arrowheads show the furrow ingression front. The cellularization process is failed in blot embryo. C, D. Confocal images of cellularizing embryos. C is the cross-section in sagittal plane., and D is the top view of the embryo surface. Slam labels the furrow canal, representing the front of furrow. The yellow arrowheads show the defects during cellularization. E. confocal images show that Blot protein is colocalized with F-actin and enriched at the furrow canal.
Preprints 71944 g001
Figure 2. Blot interacts with ELMO and recruits ELMO to the membrane. A. GFP pulldown-mass spectrometry using embryos overexpressing the Blot-GFP fusion protein. B. Immunostaining of ELMO in wildtype embryo. ELMO is enriched at the furrow canals. C, D. Blot N- and C-terminal cytoplasmic regions bind to ELMO. E2F3 is negative control. E. The snapshots from time lapse DIC movies of wildtype and ELMO embryo. Yellow arrowheads show the furrow ingression front. ELMO embryos showed a phenotype similar to that of the blot embryo. F. ELMO localization on furrow canal depends on Blot. G, H. Malpighian tubules of wildtype, blot and ELMO.
Figure 2. Blot interacts with ELMO and recruits ELMO to the membrane. A. GFP pulldown-mass spectrometry using embryos overexpressing the Blot-GFP fusion protein. B. Immunostaining of ELMO in wildtype embryo. ELMO is enriched at the furrow canals. C, D. Blot N- and C-terminal cytoplasmic regions bind to ELMO. E2F3 is negative control. E. The snapshots from time lapse DIC movies of wildtype and ELMO embryo. Yellow arrowheads show the furrow ingression front. ELMO embryos showed a phenotype similar to that of the blot embryo. F. ELMO localization on furrow canal depends on Blot. G, H. Malpighian tubules of wildtype, blot and ELMO.
Preprints 71944 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated