Preprint
Article

Rational Design of Multifunctional Ferulic Acid Derivatives Aimed for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases

Altmetrics

Downloads

244

Views

42

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

03 May 2023

Posted:

04 May 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Ferulic acid has numerous beneficial effects for human health, which are frequently attributed to its antioxidant behavior. In this report many of them are reviewed and 185 new ferulic acid derivatives are computationally designed, using the CADMA-Chem protocol. For the later, the chemical space was sampled and evaluated. To that purpose selection and elimination scores were used, which are built from a set of descriptors accounting for ADME properties, toxicity, and synthetic accessibility. After the first screening, 12 derivatives were selected and further investigated. Their potential role as antioxidants was predicted from reactivity indexes, directed related with the formal hydrogen atom transfer and the single electron transfer mechanisms. The best performing molecules were identified by comparisons with the parent molecule and two references: Trolox and alpha-tocopherol. Their potential as polygenic neuroprotectors was investigated through the interactions with enzymes directed related with the etiologies of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases. They are acetylcholinesterase, catechol-O-methyltransferase, and monoamine oxidase B. Based on the obtained results, the most promising candidates (FA-26, FA-118, and FA-138) are proposed as multifunctional antioxidants with potential neuroprotective effects. The findings derived from this investigation are encouraging and might promote further investigations on these molecules.
Keywords: 
Subject: Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Physical Chemistry

1. Introduction

Oxidative stress (OS) is a harmful multifaceted phenomenon. It is often referred to as the “chemical silent killer” since no manifest symptoms are associated with it. Till today, there is no available test to detect it. Thus its damaging effects can evolve without any advice to the affected person. Currently, OS represents a major concern linked to the onset and development of hundred illnesses, including neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s[1-20] and Parkinson’s[1, 19, 21-34] diseases. OS arises from the imbalance between the production and consumption of oxidants in living organisms. Free radicals, in particular reactive oxygen species (ROS) became toxic in high concentrations and are likely to react with important biomolecules jeopardizing its chemical integrity and functions.
Among the strategies to lessen OS risks to human health, chemical protection by antioxidant molecules is one of the most effective and studied approaches. Antioxidants can be seen as sacrifice compounds that prevent oxidants from reaching biomolecules. In fact, numerous reports have been devoted to these compounds and their capacity to ameliorate the harmful effects of OS.[28, 35-80] Recently, multifunctional antioxidants have arisen as promising candidates to deal with OS-related complex diseases. This kind of antioxidants can scavenge free radicals, chelate metals and inhibit the OH production, repair oxidatively damaged biomolecules, and inhibit enzymes involved in the development of health disorders.[81-83]
Antioxidants are produced endogenously by the human body and can be acquired through the intake of food and diet supplements. Phytochemicals have been proven to be beneficial in the treatment of several diseases.[84-110] Phenolic compounds, in particular, which are highly abundant in nature, have attracted great deal of interest due to their diverse health benefits and its proficiency to reduce OS effects.[111-129]
Ferulic acid (4-hydroxy-3-methoxy cinnamic acid, FA, Scheme 1) is one of these valuable molecules. It is found in whole grains, grapes, parsley, rhubarb, spinach, cereal seeds, artichoke, and coffee, among many other natural sources.[130] It is a versatile molecule. There are numerous reports on its antioxidant activity [131-143] as well as on its anti-inflammatory,[144, 145] antibacterial,[146-149] antiviral,[150] anti-thrombotic,[151, 152] anti-ageing, [153-155] and antitumoral effects.[156-170] It also acts as cardio protector,[171-177] neuroprotector,[178-188] antihypertensive,[189-192] antidepressant, [180, 193-198] hepatoprotector,[199-210] and has beneficial effects on diabetes[211-217] and gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity.[218]
Thus, it is not surprising that many efforts have been devoted to develop FA derivatives.[150, 156, 158, 219-264] Some of their relevant structural modification and properties are summarized in Table 1. Their bioactivities are diverse including antioxidant, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective effects. According to the gathered data, it becomes evident that the ferulic acid molecular framework is a promising choice for developing new molecules with health benefits.
In this work, a systematic and rational search for FA derivatives is presented. To that purpose a computer-assisted protocol, known as CADMA-Chem,[81] was used. The aim of the search is to find candidates that behave as multifunctional antioxidants, with potential as neuroprotectors against Parkinson’s and Alzheimer diseases. In pursuit this goal, the FA framework was modified through the inclusion of different functional groups at all R1 to R5 sites (Scheme 1). Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) properties were evaluated, as well as toxicity and synthetic accessibility (SA). Antioxidant activity trough electron and H donation was predicted. The polygenic protection was explored by the interaction with enzymes linked to the target diseases. Namely: acetylcholinesterase (AChE), monoamine oxidase type B (MAOB), and cathecol-O-methyltranferase (COMT). The inhibition of the first one has been shown to help with Alzheimer’s,[265-267] while the inhibition of the other two is beneficial for Parkinson’s.[268-275] The obtained results are encouraging and might promote further investigations on the molecules identified as the most promising candidates.

2. Computational Details

2.1. Molecular Properties

For all the designed ferulic acid derivatives (Table S1), physicochemical parameters related to absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) were evaluated (Table S2) with the Molinspiration Property Calculation Service[276] and DruLiTo software.[277] The computed parameters are employed to confirm if the designed derivatives satisfy the Lipinski’s, Ghose’s, and Veber rules.[278-280] Compounds violating more than one of Lipinski’s or Veber’s rules are assumed to have difficulties with bioavailability, while those violating Ghose’s may present absorption problems or low permeation. Viable medical drugs need also to fulfill other vital requirements, such as synthetic accessibility (SA) and safety. The SA of the designed compounds was determined with the SYLVIA-XT 1.4 program (Molecular Networks, Erlangen, Germany).[281, 282] It estimate a value between 1 and 10. The smaller the value, the more easier to synthesize is the compound. LD50 and Ames mutagenicity (M) were employed to assess the toxicity of FA and its derivatives. The Toxicity Estimation Software Tool (T.E.S.T.), version 4.1,[283] was employed to that purpose. Selection and elimination scores (Tables S2 and S3), expressed in terms of toxicity, manufacturability and ADME properties were used for sampling the molecular space. A reference set of molecules, which have been used (to some extent) as neuroprotectors was used for comparison purposes (Table S4).

2.2. Reactivity Indexes

Gaussian 09 package of programs was employed for electronic structure calculations.[284] The M05-2X/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory was used for geometry optimizations and frequency calculations. The solvation model density (SMD)[285] was used for solvent effects, using water as solvent. Local minima were identified by the absence of imaginary frequencies and unrestricted calculations were used for open shell systems. M05-2X is a wide-spectrum functional with good performance for noncovalent interactions, thermochemistry and kinetics.[286] In addition, it has been recommended for modeling open-shell systems.[287] M05-2X functional has also been successfully used to estimate bond dissociation energies (BDE), pKa values, and the free radical scavenging activity of diverse antioxidants.[288-292].
The electron propagator theory (EPT)[293, 294] was used to calculate ionization energies (IE) and electron affinities (EA). The partial third-order quasiparticle theory (P3)112 was chosen, within the EPT framework, because it produces lower mean errors than other approaches.[295] Pole strength (PS) values were checked to larger than 0.80-0.85 (Table S5), which validates the obtained results.[296]
For the estimation of BDEs, all sites likely to act as H atom donors were considered, i.e., the -CH3 in the ether moiety of FA, and the phenolic OH (sites a and b, Scheme 1) and the new groups arising from functionalization of R1 to R5 sites.
Acid constants, expressed as pKa, were calculated with the Marvin suite.[297] This property is of crucial importance for medical drugs since it governs the proportion of neutral species at a particular pH, and these are the species most likely to passively cross biological barriers.

2.3. Enzymatic Interactions

The structures of COMT (PDB ID: 3S68), MAO-B (PDB ID: 2V5Z) and AChE (PDB ID: 4EY7) co-crystallized with recognized neuroprotector drugs, tolcapone, safinamide and donepezil, respectively, were obtained from protein data bank.[298-300] Missing loop regions were fixed using Modeller web service.[301] Water molecules, and species without biological interest were removed with Discovery Studio software.[302] All structures were modelled considering pH=7.4. For ligands, atomic charges estimated by NBO protocol as single point calculations with DFT (M05-2X/6-311+G(d,p)) methodology. Docking simulations were carried out using AutoDock Vina software.[303] A gradient optimization algorithm was performed inside of the active site centered at x: -13.50, y: 37.69, z: 61.63 and grid size of 15 x 15 x 15 Å3 for COMT, x: 51.81, y: 156.34, z: 28.15 and grid size of 13 x 13 x 13 Å3 for MAO-B and x: -18.80, y: -43.83, z: 27.67 and grid size of 17 x 13 x 13 Å3 for AChE. Docking scores (DGBW) were reported for the best docked pose and weighted according to the abundance (molar fraction) of the acid-base species at physiological pH. The best conformation was analyzed and drawn with Pymol 2.5.4 software.[304]
The redocking RMSD values 1.8, 1.6 and 2.8 Å respectively and redocking scores (7.65, 10.10 and 10.86 kcal/mol) founded for tolcapone (COMT), safinamide (MAO-B) and donepezil (AChE) respectively, agrees with experimental findings. These results confirm the suitability of docking methodology. Redocking conformations are obtained with Chimera software[305] and they can be founded in Figure S1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Derivatives and Properties

By inserting -OH, -NH2, -SH and -COOH groups in sites R1 to R5, 185 new FA derivatives were built (Table S1). Twenty of them with one functional group, 160 with any possible combination of two functional groups, and 5 with three functional groups. The latter were constructed from the most promising bi-functionalized species.
A selection score (SS) was computed. It is meant to identify the FA derivatives with the most likely drug-like behavior and corresponds to that included in the CADMA-Chem protocol.[81-83, 306-308] The associated equations are provided in Table S6. The higher the value of SS the more likely the drug-like behavior. SS takes into account eight ADME properties: water/octanol partition coefficient (logP), topological polar surface area (PSA), number of heavy atoms (XAt), molecular weight (MW), number of H-bond acceptors (HBA), number of H-bond donors (HBD), rotatable bonds (RB), and molar refractivity (MR); two toxicity descriptors: oral rat 50 percent lethal dose (LD50) and Ames’ mutagenicity (M); and the synthetic accessibility (SA).
The SS for all the designed FA derivatives is presented in Figure 1. The parent molecule and the average SS value for the reference set are included for comparison purposes. The individual values of all the FA derivatives are reported in Table S2, together with those of the above-mentioned descriptors. Higher values of SS suggest better drug-like behavior, lower toxicity, and easier synthesis. The first screening was based on this score, and twelve FA derivatives were selected. However, before moving them forward to the next stage of the investigation (Scheme 2) a double-check analysis was performed using exclusion scores (SE), which allows verifying if any of the selected molecules significantly deviates (in any of its properties) from the average value of the reference set.
Four exclusion scores were analyzed (SE,ADME2, SE,ADME8, SE,ADMET and SE,ADMETSA). Their equations are provided Table S7. SE,ADME8, SE,ADMET and SE,ADMETSA are extensions of the well-known SE,ADME2, based on two descriptors (logP and MW).[309, 310] SE,ADME8 uses the same kind of strategy as SE,ADME2, but includes six additional terms (PSA, XAt, HBA, HBD, RB, and MR). SE,ADMET and SE,ADMETSA also include toxicity (LD50 and M) and synthetic accessibility (SA) descriptors.
SE,ADME2 values were previously estimated to be between 1.2 and 1.5 for 1791, 152 and 35 oral drugs.[309, 310] For the 12 selected FA derivatives the average SE,ADME2 value was found to be 1.06, with individual values ranging from 0.56 to 1.42 (Table S4). The estimated average values for the other elimination scores were found to be: SE,ADME8 = 4.86 (ranging from 2.59 to 7.34). SE,ADMET = 8.13 ( ranging from 4.53 to 11.54), and SE,ADMETSA = 9.59 (ranging from 5.50 to 12.52). It seems worthwhile mentioning that high values of the exclusion scores might result from either worse or better behavior than the average of the reference drugs. Thus, a detailed analysis is required to determine if any particular candidate should be removed from the selection or not.
According to the gathered results (Figure 2), toxicity is responsible for the largest deviation. Regarding ADME, the six additional descriptors lead to largest deviation than logP and MW. Synthetic accessibility also has rather small influence on the deviations from the reference molecules. A more detailed examination, considering the individual contribution of all the investigated descriptors is presented in Figure 3.
The more important deviations arise from LD50, followed by M, PSA and HBD. the FA derivatives with the largest LD50 deviations from the reference set are FA, FA-173, FA-175 and FA-26. However, they correspond to a lower toxicity to rats than the reference average (LD50 = 960.8), with values 4742.7, 4471.9, 4040.7, and 3635.2, respectively. Regarding Ames mutagenicity, a similar trend was found. The FA derivatives predicted as the least mutagenic are just those that deviate the most from the reference set average (M = 0.41). They are FA-88, FA-106, FA-115 and FA-142, all with M = 0.01. Thus, these deviations imply that the above-mentioned derivatives have a more desirable behavior than that of the reference set. Accordingly, they were not excluded from the chosen subset.
The largest PSA deviation were found for FA-41, FA-26, FA-88 and FA-173 (124.3, 113.0, 104.1 and 104.1 Å2, respectively). However, their PSA values are all below the Veber’s limit: 140 Å2. Thus, these derivatives were also kept in the chosen subset. The largest deviations for HBD correspond to FA-26 with HBD = 5 and FA-8, FA-41 and FA-138 with HBD = 4. Since they do not represent violations of the Lipinski’s rule, these candidates were not eliminated.
After carefully examining elimination scores for the 12 FA derivatives with the highest SS values, none of them were excluded from the selection. Thus, they move forward to the next stage, which is the investigation of the antioxidant capacity through electron and H-atom donation. This detailed analysis is important since it allows interpreting deviations for all the used descriptors, and prevents from excluding suitable candidates for no good reason.

3.2. pKa and Antioxidant Activity

As previously mentioned, acid-base equilibria are crucial for medical drugs intended to passively cross biological barriers. The pKa values and molar fractions (Mf), at physiological pH, were estimated for the 12 FA derivatives chosen in the first stage of the investigation as those with the best drug-like behavior (Table 2). Additionally, the corresponding deprotonation routes and distribution diagrams are provided in Figures S2 and S3.
The calculated molar fractions (Table 2) revealed that 7 of the 12 derivatives, selected based on the SS value, would have negligible population (<10-4) at physiological pH, i.e., at pH=7.4. Thus, they were excluded as viable candidates. Albeit the Mf(0) for other 3 (FA-26, FA-118, and FA-175) are rather small, they are very similar to that of FA. Since there is abundant data on the biological activities of FA (Table 1), it can be inferred that such fractions are enough. Consequently, 5 derivatives (FA-8, FA-26, FA-118, FA-138, and FA-175) were further investigated. Among the studied derivatives, FA-138 is the only one that is predicted to have similar fractions of neutral (q= 0) and anionic (q= -1) species. This feature might be relevant to its possible use as multifunctional antioxidant. The rather large neutral fraction (59.0%) is expected to promote passive crossing through biological membranes, while the anionic fraction (40.3%) is likely to be the key one for the free radical scavenging activity as it is the case for many phenolic compounds.
The ionization energies (IE), electron affinities (EA), and the lowest bond dissociation energies (BDE) for the acid-base species with non-negligible population (Mf(q) ≥ 10-4) of FA and its derivatives, at pH=7.4, are reported in Table 3. The complete set of BDEs, i.e., considering all viable H-donating sites, is provided as Supplementary Materials (Table S8). IE and BDE reactivity indexes are related to the viability of electron and H atom donation. Thus, they were used to compare the efficiency of the derivatives with that of reference antioxidants, as free radical scavengers via single electron transfer (SET) and formal hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) mechanisms, respectively.
IE and BDE values were used to build the electron and hydrogen donating ability map for antioxidants (eH-DAMA, Figure 4). This graphical tool has been recently proposed to simultaneously accounting for the likeliness of molecules as H donors (formal HAT reaction route) and electron donors (SET reaction route).92,93 The dominant acid-base species of the investigated FA derivatives, at physiological pH, were included in this map; as well as two antioxidant references (Trolox and α-tocopherol), the parent molecule, and the H2O2/O2•−. This pair represents the potential oxidant target. The best radical scavengers are expected to be located at the bottom left, i.e., lower IE and lower BDE. The species in this region are likely to simultaneously act as electron and H-atom donors.
Based on the eH-DAMA (Figure 4) it is predicted that the five FA derivatives included in it should be efficient for scavenging peroxyl radicals through both mechanisms, SET and f-HAT. Their efficient for that purpose is expected to surpass that of α-tocopherol and ferulic acid. On the contrary, only the anionic form of FA-138 is predicted to be more efficient than Trolox for that purpose. FA-8 may be better electron donor than Trolox, but not as good for donating H-atoms. However, further investigation dealing with other aspects of antioxidant activity, kinetics in particular, are still needed to confirm of refute the foreseen trends.

3.3. Polygenic Activity

The possible neuroprotection activity of the ferulic acid derivatives was investigated using molecular docking studies. Only the compounds with a significant molar fraction of the neutral specie, at physiological pH, were studied. To evaluate the general neuroprotection activity, a polygenic score (SP) was developed. SP is a measure of the tested compounds capacity to bind to the enzymes compared with natural substrates (COMT: dopamine (dopa), MAO-B phenylethylamine (pea) and AChE: acetylcholine (ACh). It was defined according to our previously reports [81, 82] as:
S P = G B ,   C O M T W G B ,   d o p a + G B , M A O B W G B , p e a + G B ,   A C h E W G B ,   A C h
The scoring values are presented in the Table 4. When the values of SP are examined, it can be predicted that the compounds exhibit neuroprotection activity since their scores are higher than the those of the corresponding natural substrates (SP= 3.00), i.e., the investigated ferulic acid derivatives may present stronger affinities towards the enzymes. Among the studied compounds, the FA-26 analog is expected to have the best neuroprotection activity. Interestingly, according with the docking results, the parent molecule (ferulic acid) is also likely act as a neuroprotector.
The examination of individual DGBW values reveals that the studied compounds could be better inhibitors for AChE and MAO-B than they are for the COMT enzyme. Negative values of COMT (blue fragment of the bars, in Figure 5) indicates that this enzyme forms more stable complexes with dopamine than with the tested FA derivatives. Only FA-118 shows a slightly higher score than dopamine. Interestingly, this compound has a catechol moiety, which is recognized to exhibit effective COMT inhibition potential.[311] FA-175 presents almost the same score as dopamine (log DGWB/DGB,sub= - 0.001). On the other hand, for MAO-B and AChE (green and red fragments, respectively, Figure 5), the neuroprotection behavior of FA derivatives was evidenced by their positive values. Between these two enzymes, the inhibitor potential of the studied derivatives is expected to be stronger for AChE, which suggests an improved activity against acetylcholine degradation. The complete set of binding energies can be founded in Table S9, Supplementary Materials.
The main interactions for the complexes with the highest SP are shown in Figure 6. They are FA-26 with AChE (left), FA-26 with MAO-B (middle), and FA-118 with COMT (right). For all of them FA-26 is in its anionic form, which is the most abundant species at physiological pH (X~0.97). To understand the interactions formed in the protein-ligand complexes, it is important to know the architecture of the enzymes and the function of the key residues. AChE has a highly specialized structure, which allows it to be one of the fastest known enzymes. The catalytic triad (H447, E334 and S203) is founded at the bottom of the enzyme and surrounded by 14 well conserved aromatic residue.[312] Among them, W83 plays an essential role since it forms a substrate union site, while Y70, Y121, and W279 conform the anionic peripheric site.[312] Additionally, AChE has a high dipole moment with the axis oriented towards the substrate entry site. It has been suggested that this moment may serve to pull down the cationic substrate of AChE. This dipole is controlled mainly by residues D71, E199, and E443.[313]
FA-26 has several H-bond donors and acceptors, and an aromatic ring that contribute to generate intermolecular connections with the AChE key amino acids. In fact, complex FA-26:AChE is formed by several interactions, mainly hydrogen bonds and p-interactions. This derivative is bonded to the active site of AChE through four hydrogen bonds (D71, Y121, F292, and Y338), one p-stacking interaction (Y334) and one p-alkyl interaction (W83). The observed interactions suggest that FA-26, although not bonded to the catalytic triad, can inhibit the ACh degradation, blocking the entry and union sites.
MAO-B function involves two hydrophobic pockets, an entry pocket and an active site pocket with I199 acting as a gatekeeper between two cavities. The catalytic reaction site comprises a redox cofactor, flavin adenosin dinuleotide (FAD). The active site is completed by residues Y398 and Y435, orienting the substrate to the proper position.[314]
Four H-bonds involving Q206, L171, and FAD; a p-stacking (F343); and non-conventional C-H bonds stabilize the complex formation. An important feature of the conformation adopted by FA-26 in the complex is the formation of an H-bond with N5 in the FAD moiety. This atom is required for the redox activity of the cofactor[314] and, hence, for the catalytic function of the enzyme. This conformation could not be achieved without the orientation promoted by the L171 and Y398 residues, which suggests that FA-26 could inhibit some enzymes with the same mechanism of action as MAO (type A) or other flavoenzymes as lactate oxidase.[315] According to these findings, FA-26 is predicted to act as a reversible or non-covalent MAO-B inhibitor as Safinamide o Moclobemide,[299, 316], which are recognized antidepressant drugs. This way of inhibition is preferable since it has been proven to be associated with less toxicity than others.[317]
COMT is a selective enzyme that catalyzes the transfer of methyl groups to the 3-OH position of catecholamines. COMT is a Mg-dependent enzyme, with the metal bound to D141, D169, and N170 residues. This enzyme uses the Mg atom to bind the substrate and make it more easily ionizable.[318] The methyl group is transferred by S-Adenosylmethionine cofactor. The binding substrate site is completed with several hydrophobic residues M40, L198, W143, and the gatekeepers W38 and P174.[318].
FA-118 has a catechol moiety that binds the Mg atom, according to the docking simulations by two metal-donor unions. A hard acid-base interaction (Mg-O) stabilizes the formation of this adduct. In addition, H-bonds between the catechol fragment and the residues K144 and N170 also contribute to the binding energy. Finally, several hydrophobic interactions with key residues of the active site (M40 and P174) complete the stabilization of the FA-118:COMT complex. Such an arrangement explains the good score obtained in the simulations and suggests that FA-118 can be efficient as a COMT inhibitor.
The docking simulations indicate that while all the investigated FA derivatives can act as neuroprotectors of acetylcholine and phenylethylamine (with FA-26 being predicted as the best one for that purpose), only FA-118 would be able to protect dopamine against COMT-induced degradation. Accordingly, FA-118 is proposed as a promising candidate in the context of Alzheimer’s and/or anti-anxiety disorders, while FA-26 was identified as the best candidate (among the studied molecule) for Parkinson´s. All of them certainly deserve further investigations related to their potential as neuroprotectors.

4. Conclusions

A total of 185 ferulic acid (FA) derivatives were built through a rational in silico design, using the CADMA-Chem protocol. The chemical space was sampled using a selection score (SS) that considers ADME properties, toxicity and synthetic accessibility descriptors. Based on the estimated SS values, 12 FA derivatives were identified as the candidates with the best drug-like behavior. For this subset, some reactivity indices were computed, as well as their pKa values. According to eH-DAMA results, that takes into account the free radical scavenging behavior through single electron transfer (SET) and formal hydrogen transfer (HAT) mechanisms, FA-138 seems to be the best candidate to scavenge free radicals. However, FA-8, FA-26, FA-118, and FA-175 derivatives are predicted to be better for that purpose than α-tocopherol and the parent molecule.
On the other hand, docking studies suggest that ferulic acid and some of its derivatives can act as inhibitors of AChE and MAO-B enzymes. FA-26 is predicted as the most efficient one for that purpose. This compound is bounded preferably to the entry site of AChE and to the catalytic site of MAO-B, acting as a reversible inhibitor for the latter. On the contrary, FA-118 was the only compound identified as a viable candidate to efficiently inhibit COMT. Accordingly, FA-26 is proposed as the best candidate in the context of Alzheimer’s and/or anti-anxiety disorders, and FA-118 for Parkinson’s. At least these two compounds certainly deserve further investigation regarding their potential role as neuroprotectors.
Considering the gathered data altogether the FA derivatives proposed to further investigations are FA-26, FA-118, and FA-138.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: FA derivatives designed in this work. Table S2: Values of the ADME properties, toxicity descriptors, synthetic accessibility, and selection score (SS) for all designed derivatives. Table S3: Elimination scores for the subset of ferulic acid derivatives chosen as the most promising, according to SS. Table S4: Reference set of molecules, with some neuroprotective effects. Table S5: Pole strength values for the EPT approximation (P3) used to calculated ionization energies and electron affinities. Table S6: Equations concerning SS construction. Table S7: Exclusion scores (SE) equations. Table S8: Complete set of BDEs for ferulic acid and its derivatives. Table S9: Complete set of the binding energies for ferulic acid and its derivatives. Figure S1: Redocking simulation: tolcapone in COMT, Safrinamide in MAO-B, and Donopezil in AChE. Figure S2: Deprotonation routes for the subset of ferulic acid derivatives chosen as the most promising, from their drug-like behavior. Figure S3: Distribution diagram of the acid-base species of ferulic acid derivatives.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G.; Investigation, E.G.G-G., M.R., L.F.H-A.; Formal Analysis, E.G.G-G., M.R., L.F.H-A. and A.G.; Methodology, E.G.G-G., M.R., L.F.H-A. and A.G.; Project Administration, A.G.; Supervision, A.G.; Validation, E.G.G-G., M.R., L.F.H-A.; Visualization, E.G.G-G., M.R., L.F.H-A. and A.G.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, E.G.G-G., M.R., L.F.H-A.; Writing – Review & Editing, A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank to the Laboratorio de Visualización y Cómputo Paralelo at Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa for computing time. E.G.G.L. acknowledges CONACyT for Doctoral fellowship. L.F.H.A thanks to Estancias Posdoctorales por México (2022) CONACyT program for postdoctoral grant.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aborode, A.T.; Pustake, M.; Awuah, W.A.; Alwerdani, M.; Shah, P.; Yarlagadda, R.; Ahmad, S.; Silva Correia, I.F.; Chandra, A.; Nansubuga, E.P.; Abdul-Rahman, T.; Mehta, A.; Ali, O.; Amaka, S.O.; Zuñiga, Y.M.H.; Shkodina, A.D.; Inya, O.C.; Shen, B.; Alexiou, A. , Targeting Oxidative Stress Mechanisms to Treat Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease: A Critical Review. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 7934442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Allan Butterfield, D.; Boyd-Kimball, D. , Mitochondrial oxidative and nitrosative stress and Alzheimer disease. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Anwar, M.M. , Oxidative stress-A direct bridge to central nervous system homeostatic dysfunction and Alzheimer's disease. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2022, 40, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Beura, S.K.; Dhapola, R.; Panigrahi, A.R.; Yadav, P.; Reddy, D.H.; Singh, S.K. , Redefining oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease: Targeting platelet reactive oxygen species for novel therapeutic options. Life Sci. 2022, 306, 120855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bhatia, V.; Sharma, S. , Role of mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress and autophagy in progression of Alzheimer's disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 2021, 421, 117253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Butterfield, D.A.; Halliwell, B. , Oxidative stress, dysfunctional glucose metabolism and Alzheimer disease. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2019, 20, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cassidy, L.; Fernandez, F.; Johnson, J.B.; Naiker, M.; Owoola, A.G.; Broszczak, D.A. , Oxidative stress in alzheimer's disease: A review on emergent natural polyphenolic therapeutics. Complement. Ther. Med. 2020, 49, 102294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cheignon, C.; Tomas, M.; Bonnefont-Rousselot, D.; Faller, P.; Hureau, C.; Collin, F. , Oxidative stress and the amyloid beta peptide in Alzheimer's disease. Redox Biol. 2018, 14, 450–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cioffi, F.; Adam, R.H.I.; Bansal, R.; Broersen, K. , A review of oxidative stress products and related genes in early alzheimer's disease. J. Alzheimer's Dis. 2021, 83, 977–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cioffi, F.; Adam, R.H.I.; Broersen, K. , Molecular Mechanisms and Genetics of Oxidative Stress in Alzheimer's Disease. J. Alzheimer's Dis. 2019, 72, 981–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ionescu-Tucker, A.; Cotman, C.W. , Emerging roles of oxidative stress in brain aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2021, 107, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Juszczyk, G.; Mikulska, J.; Kasperek, K.; Pietrzak, D.; Mrozek, W.; Herbet, M. , Chronic stress and oxidative stress as common factors of the pathogenesis of depression and alzheimer’s disease; the role of antioxidants in prevention and treatment. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kowalska, M.; Wize, K.; Prendecki, M.; Lianeri, M.; Kozubski, W.; Dorszewska, J. , Genetic variants and oxidative stress in alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2020, 17, 208–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Misrani, A.; Tabassum, S.; Yang, L. , Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021, 13, 617588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rummel, N.G.; Butterfield, D.A. , Altered Metabolism in Alzheimer Disease Brain: Role of Oxidative Stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2022, 36, 1289–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shabbir, U.; Tyagi, A.; Elahi, F.; Aloo, S.O.; Oh, D.H. , The potential role of polyphenols in oxidative stress and inflammation induced by gut microbiota in alzheimer’s disease. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sharma, C.; Kim, S.R. , Linking oxidative stress and proteinopathy in alzheimer’s disease. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Simunkova, M.; Alwasel, S.H.; Alhazza, I.M.; Jomova, K.; Kollar, V.; Rusko, M.; Valko, M. , Management of oxidative stress and other pathologies in Alzheimer’s disease. Arch. Toxicol. 2019, 93, 2491–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tchekalarova, J.; Tzoneva, R. , Oxidative Stress and Aging as Risk Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease: The Role of the Antioxidant Melatonin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhao, Z. , Iron and oxidizing species in oxidative stress and Alzheimer's disease. Aging Med. 2019, 2, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chang, K.H.; Chen, C.M. , The role of oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dionísio, P.A.; Amaral, J.D.; Rodrigues, C.M.P. , Oxidative stress and regulated cell death in Parkinson's disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 2021, 67, 101263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dorszewska, J.; Kowalska, M.; Prendecki, M.; Piekut, T.; Kozłowska, J.; Kozubski, W. , Oxidative stress factors in Parkinson's disease. Neural Regen. Res. 2021, 16, 1383–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Guo, J.D.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Li, G.R.; Liu, X.L. , Damage to dopaminergic neurons by oxidative stress in Parkinson's disease (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 41, 1817–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hassanzadeh, K.; Rahimmi, A. , Oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in the story of Parkinson’s disease: Could targeting these pathways write a good ending? J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 234, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hor, S.L.; Teoh, S.L.; Lim, W.L. , Plant polyphenols as neuroprotective agents in parkinson’s disease targeting oxidative stress. Curr. Drug Targets 2020, 21, 458–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Monzani, E.; Nicolis, S.; Dell'Acqua, S.; Capucciati, A.; Bacchella, C.; Zucca, F.A.; Mosharov, E.V.; Sulzer, D.; Zecca, L.; Casella, L. , Dopamine, Oxidative Stress and Protein–Quinone Modifications in Parkinson's and Other Neurodegenerative Diseases. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2019, 58, 6512–6527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Percário, S.; Da Silva Barbosa, A.; Varela, E.L.P.; Gomes, A.R.Q.; Ferreira, M.E.S.; De Nazaré Araújo Moreira, T.; Dolabela, M.F. , Oxidative Stress in Parkinson's Disease: Potential Benefits of Antioxidant Supplementation. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 2360872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Puspita, L.; Chung, S.Y.; Shim, J.W. , Oxidative stress and cellular pathologies in Parkinson's disease. Mol. Brain 2017, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pyatha, S.; Kim, H.; Lee, D.; Kim, K. , Association between Heavy Metal Exposure and Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of the Mechanisms Related to Oxidative Stress. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rizor, A.; Pajarillo, E.; Johnson, J.; Aschner, M.; Lee, E. , Astrocytic oxidative/nitrosative stress contributes to parkinson’s disease pathogenesis: The dual role of reactive astrocytes. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Trist, B.G.; Hare, D.J.; Double, K.L. , Oxidative stress in the aging substantia nigra and the etiology of Parkinson's disease. Aging Cell 2019, 18, e13031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vallée, A.; Lecarpentier, Y.; Guillevin, R.; Vallée, J.N. , Circadian rhythms, Neuroinflammation and Oxidative Stress in the Story of Parkinson's Disease. Cells 2020, 9, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wei, Z.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Cheng, Y. , Oxidative Stress in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2018, 11, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Adhikari, R.; Shiwakoti, S.; Ko, J.Y.; Dhakal, B.; Park, S.H.; Choi, I.J.; Kim, H.J.; Oak, M.H. , Oxidative Stress in Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis: Protective Role of Natural Antioxidants. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Amponsah-Offeh, M.; Diaba-Nuhoho, P.; Speier, S.; Morawietz, H. , Oxidative Stress, Antioxidants and Hypertension. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Baboo, K.; Chen, Z.Y.; Zhang, X.M. , Role of oxidative stress and antioxidant therapies in endometriosis. Reprod. Dev. Med. 2019, 3, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Berríos-Cárcamo, P.; Quezada, M.; Quintanilla, M.E.; Morales, P.; Ezquer, M.; Herrera-Marschitz, M.; Israel, Y.; Ezquer, F. , Oxidative stress and neuroinflammation as a pivot in drug abuse. A focus on the therapeutic potential of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agents and biomolecules. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Black, H.S. , A Synopsis of the Associations of Oxidative Stress, ROS, and Antioxidants with Diabetes Mellitus. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bouyahya, A.; Menyiy, N.E.; Oumeslakht, L.; Allam, A.E.; Balahbib, A.; Rauf, A.; Muhammad, N.; Kuznetsova, E.; Derkho, M.; Thiruvengadam, M.; Shariati, M.A.; Omari, N.E. , Preclinical and clinical antioxidant effects of natural compounds against oxidative stress-induced epigenetic instability in tumor cells. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. De Luca, M.N.; Colone, M.; Gambioli, R.; Stringaro, A.; Unfer, V. , Oxidative stress and male fertility: Role of antioxidants and inositols. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Deng, L.; Du, C.; Song, P.; Chen, T.; Rui, S.; Armstrong, D.G.; Deng, W. , The Role of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Diabetic Wound Healing. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 8852759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dong, C.; Zhang, N.J.; Zhang, L.J. , Oxidative stress in leukemia and antioxidant treatment. Chin. Med. J. 2021, 134, 1897–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Engwa, G.A.; Nweke, F.N.; Nkeh-Chungag, B.N. , Free Radicals, Oxidative Stress-Related Diseases and Antioxidant Supplementation. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2022, 28, 144–128. [Google Scholar]
  45. Forman, H.J.; Zhang, H. , Targeting oxidative stress in disease: promise and limitations of antioxidant therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 689–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gomes, A.R.Q.; Cunha, N.; Varela, E.L.P.; Brígido, H.P.C.; Vale, V.V.; Dolabela, M.F.; de Carvalho, E.P.; Percário, S. , Oxidative Stress in Malaria: Potential Benefits of Antioxidant Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Han, M.; Lee, D.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, T.H. , Oxidative stress and antioxidant pathway in allergic rhinitis. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hou, T.Y.; Wu, S.B.; Kau, H.C.; Tsai, C.C. , The role of oxidative stress and therapeutic potential of antioxidants in graves’ ophthalmopathy. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hsueh, Y.J.; Chen, Y.N.; Tsao, Y.T.; Cheng, C.M.; Wu, W.C.; Chen, H.C. , The Pathomechanism, Antioxidant Biomarkers, and Treatment of Oxidative Stress-Related Eye Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hu, X.; Dong, D.; Xia, M.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Su, J.; Sun, L.; Yu, H. , Oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity: Development and prospects. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 11405–11419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hussain, T.; Murtaza, G.; Metwally, E.; Kalhoro, D.H.; Kalhoro, M.S.; Rahu, B.A.; Sahito, R.G.A.; Yin, Y.; Yang, H.; Chughtai, M.I.; Tan, B. , The Role of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Balance in Pregnancy. Mediators Inflamm. 2021, 2021, 9962860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Iakovou, E.; Kourti, M. , A Comprehensive Overview of the Complex Role of Oxidative Stress in Aging, The Contributing Environmental Stressors and Emerging Antioxidant Therapeutic Interventions. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 14, 827900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kishimoto-Urata, M.; Urata, S.; Fujimoto, C.; Yamasoba, T. , Role of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Acquired Inner Ear Disorders. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kumar, H.; Bhardwaj, K.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuča, K.; Dhanjal, D.S.; Bhardwaj, S.; Bhatia, S.K.; Verma, R.; Kumar, D. , Antioxidant functionalized nanoparticles: A combat against oxidative stress. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kumar, S.; Saxena, J.; Srivastava, V.K.; Kaushik, S.; Singh, H.; Abo-El-Sooud, K.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Jyoti, A.; Saluja, R. , The Interplay of Oxidative Stress and ROS Scavenging: Antioxidants as a Therapeutic Potential in Sepsis. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Liu, P.; Li, Y.; Wang, R.; Ren, F.; Wang, X. , Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Nanotherapeutic Approaches for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Biomedicines 2021, 10, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Macvanin, M.T.; Gluvic, Z.; Zafirovic, S.; Gao, X.; Essack, M.; Isenovic, E.R. , The protective role of nutritional antioxidants against oxidative stress in thyroid disorders. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2023, 13, 1092837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Marcucci, G.; Domazetovic, V.; Nediani, C.; Ruzzolini, J.; Favre, C.; Brandi, M.L. , Oxidative Stress and Natural Antioxidants in Osteoporosis: Novel Preventive and Therapeutic Approaches. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Meli, R.; Monnolo, A.; Annunziata, C.; Pirozzi, C.; Ferrante, M.C. , Oxidative stress and BPA toxicity: An antioxidant approach for male and female reproductive dysfunction. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Meulmeester, F.L.; Luo, J.; Martens, L.G.; Mills, K.; van Heemst, D.; Noordam, R. , Antioxidant Supplementation in Oxidative Stress-Related Diseases: What Have We Learned from Studies on Alpha-Tocopherol? Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nandi, S.; Ahmed, S.; Saxena, A.K. , Exploring the Role of Antioxidants to Combat Oxidative Stress in Malaria Parasites. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2022, 22, 2029–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nantachai, G.; Vasupanrajit, A.; Tunvirachaisakul, C.; Solmi, M.; Maes, M. , Oxidative stress and antioxidant defenses in mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 2022, 79, 101639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Olufunmilayo, E.O.; Gerke-Duncan, M.B.; Holsinger, R.M.D. , Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Neurodegenerative Disorders. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pisoschi, A.M.; Pop, A.; Iordache, F.; Stanca, L.; Predoi, G.; Serban, A.I. , Oxidative stress mitigation by antioxidants - An overview on their chemistry and influences on health status. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 209, 112891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Poznyak, A.V.; Grechko, A.V.; Orekhova, V.A.; Chegodaev, Y.S.; Wu, W.K.; Orekhov, A.N. , Oxidative stress and antioxidants in atherosclerosis development and treatment. Biology 2020, 9, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rajoka, M.S.R.; Thirumdas, R.; Mehwish, H.M.; Umair, M.; Khurshid, M.; Hayat, H.F.; Phimolsiripol, Y.; Pallarés, N.; Martí-Quijal, F.J.; Barba, F.J. , Role of food antioxidants in modulating gut microbial communities: Novel understandings in intestinal oxidative stress damage and their impact on host health. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rana, K.; Gautam, P. , A Review on Antioxidants as Therapeutic in Use of Oxidative Stress and Neurodegenerative Disease. Int. J. Pharm. Qual. Assur. 2022, 13, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
  68. Rivas-Arancibia, S.; Hernández-Orozco, E.; Rodríguez-Martínez, E.; Valdés-Fuentes, M.; Cornejo-Trejo, V.; Pérez-Pacheco, N.; Dorado-Martínez, C.; Zequeida-Carmona, D.; Espinosa-Caleti, I. , Ozone Pollution, Oxidative Stress, Regulatory T Cells and Antioxidants. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shohag, S.; Akhter, S.; Islam, S.; Sarker, T.; Sifat, M.K.; Rahman, M.M.; Islam, M.R.; Sharma, R. , Perspectives on the Molecular Mediators of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Strategies in the Context of Neuroprotection and Neurolongevity: An Extensive Review. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 7743705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Taherkhani, S.; Valaei, K.; Arazi, H.; Suzuki, K. , An overview of physical exercise and antioxidant supplementation influences on skeletal muscle oxidative stress. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tai, J.; Shin, J.M.; Park, J.; Han, M.; Kim, T.H. , Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tain, Y.L.; Hsu, C.N. , Oxidative Stress-Induced Hypertension of Developmental Origins: Preventive Aspects of Antioxidant Therapy. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Theofanous, T.; Kourti, M. , Abrogating Oxidative Stress as a Therapeutic Strategy Against Parkinson’s Disease: A Mini Review of the Recent Advances on Natural Therapeutic Antioxidant and Neuroprotective Agents. Med. Chem. 2022, 18, 772–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tsermpini, E.E.; Plemenitaš Ilješ, A.; Dolžan, V. , Alcohol-Induced Oxidative Stress and the Role of Antioxidants in Alcohol Use Disorder: A Systematic Review. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Varesi, A.; Chirumbolo, S.; Campagnoli, L.I.M.; Pierella, E.; Piccini, G.B.; Carrara, A.; Ricevuti, G.; Scassellati, C.; Bonvicini, C.; Pascale, A. , The Role of Antioxidants in the Interplay between Oxidative Stress and Senescence. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Vona, R.; Sposi, N.M.; Mattia, L.; Gambardella, L.; Straface, E.; Pietraforte, D. , Sickle cell disease: Role of oxidative stress and antioxidant therapy. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, W.; Kang, P.M. , Oxidative stress and antioxidant treatments in cardiovascular diseases. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xing, Y.; Miao, C.; Zhao, Y.; Chang, X.; Zhang, Q. , The Role of Oxidative Stress and Natural Antioxidants in Ovarian Aging. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 11, 617843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, N.; Guan, Q.W.; Chen, F.H.; Xia, Q.X.; Yin, X.X.; Zhou, H.H.; Mao, X.Y. , Antioxidants targeting mitochondrial oxidative stress: Promising neuroprotectants for epilepsy. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 6687185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zafar, M.S.; Quarta, A.; Marradi, M.; Ragusa, A. , Recent developments in the reduction of oxidative stress through antioxidant polymeric formulations. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Guzman-Lopez, E.G.; Reina, M.; Perez-Gonzalez, A.; Francisco-Marquez, M.; Hernandez-Ayala, L.F.; Castañeda-Arriaga, R.; Galano, A. , CADMA-Chem: A Computational Protocol Based on Chemical Properties Aimed to Design Multifunctional Antioxidants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pérez-González, A.; Castañeda-Arriaga, R.; Guzmán-López, E.G.; Hernández-Ayala, L.F.; Galano, A. , Chalcone Derivatives with a High Potential as Multifunctional Antioxidant Neuroprotectors. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 38254–38268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Reina, M.; Guzmán-López, E.G.; Galano, A. , Computational design of rasagiline derivatives: Searching for enhanced antioxidant capability. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2023, 123, e27011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ahmad, S.S.; Khalid, M.; Kamal, M.A.; Younis, K. , Study of Nutraceuticals and Phytochemicals for the Management of Alzheimer's Disease: A Review. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2021, 19, 1884–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Bachheti, R.K.; Worku, L.A.; Gonfa, Y.H.; Zebeaman, M.; Deepti; Pandey, D. P.; Bachheti, A., Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases with Plant Phytochemicals: A Review. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2022, 2022, 5741198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bakrim, S.; Aboulaghras, S.; El Menyiy, N.; El Omari, N.; Assaggaf, H.; Lee, L.H.; Montesano, D.; Gallo, M.; Zengin, G.; AlDhaheri, Y.; Bouyahya, A. , Phytochemical Compounds and Nanoparticles as Phytochemical Delivery Systems for Alzheimer’s Disease Management. Molecules 2022, 27, 9043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Balakrishnan, R.; Azam, S.; Cho, D.Y.; Su-Kim, I.; Choi, D.K. , Natural Phytochemicals as Novel Therapeutic Strategies to Prevent and Treat Parkinson's Disease: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 6680935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Behl, T.; Rana, T.; Sehgal, A.; Makeen, H.A.; Albratty, M.; Alhazmi, H.A.; Meraya, A.M.; Bhatia, S.; Sachdeva, M. , Phytochemicals targeting nitric oxide signaling in neurodegenerative diseases. Nitric Oxide - Biol. Chem. 2023, 130, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bungau, S.; Vesa, C.M.; Abid, A.; Behl, T.; Tit, D.M.; Purza, A.L.; Pasca, B.; Todan, L.M.; Endres, L. , Withaferin a—a promising phytochemical compound with multiple results in dermatological diseases. Molecules 2021, 26, 2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cheng, X.; Chen, Q.; Sun, P. , Natural phytochemicals that affect autophagy in the treatment of oral diseases and infections: A review. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 970596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dsouza, V.L.; Shivakumar, A.B.; Kulal, N.; Gangadharan, G.; Kumar, D.; Kabekkodu, S.P. , Phytochemical based Modulation of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Alzheimer's Disease. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2022, 22, 1880–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Eilam, Y.; Pintel, N.; Khattib, H.; Shagug, N.; Taha, R.; Avni, D. , Regulation of Cholesterol Metabolism by Phytochemicals Derived from Algae and Edible Mushrooms in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Forni, C.; Facchiano, F.; Bartoli, M.; Pieretti, S.; Facchiano, A.; D'Arcangelo, D.; Norelli, S.; Valle, G.; Nisini, R.; Beninati, S.; Tabolacci, C.; Jadeja, R.N. , Beneficial role of phytochemicals on oxidative stress and age-related diseases. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 8748253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ganesan, K.; Quiles, J.L.; Daglia, M.; Xiao, J.; Xu, B. , Dietary phytochemicals modulate intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Food Front. 2021, 2, 357–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. He, W.J.; Lv, C.H.; Chen, Z.; Shi, M.; Zeng, C.X.; Hou, D.X.; Qin, S. , The Regulatory Effect of Phytochemicals on Chronic Diseases by Targeting Nrf2-ARE Signaling Pathway. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Hossen, I.; Hua, W.; Ting, L.; Mehmood, A.; Jingyi, S.; Duoxia, X.; Yanping, C.; Hongqing, W.; Zhipeng, G.; Kaiqi, Z.; Fang, Y.; Junsong, X. , Phytochemicals and inflammatory bowel disease: a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 1321–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Islam, S.U.; Ahmed, M.B.; Ahsan, H.; Lee, Y.S. , Recent molecular mechanisms and beneficial effects of phytochemicals and plant-based whole foods in reducing ldl-c and preventing cardiovascular disease. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jaiswal, V.; Lee, H.J. , Pharmacological Activities of Mogrol: Potential Phytochemical against Different Diseases. Life 2023, 13, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Laurindo, L.F.; de Maio, M.C.; Minniti, G.; de Góes Corrêa, N.; Barbalho, S.M.; Quesada, K.; Guiguer, E.L.; Sloan, K.P.; Detregiachi, C.R.P.; Araújo, A.C.; de Alvares Goulart, R. , Effects of Medicinal Plants and Phytochemicals in Nrf2 Pathways during Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Related Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Metabolites 2023, 13, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Liu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, A.; Liu, R.; Yang, H.; Xia, X. , The Phytochemical Potential for Brain Disease Therapy and the Possible Nanodelivery Solutions for Brain Access. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 936054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Naoi, M.; Maruyama, W.; Shamoto-Nagai, M. , Disease-modifying treatment of Parkinson’s disease by phytochemicals: targeting multiple pathogenic factors. J. Neural Transm. 2022, 129, 737–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Nistor, M.; Pop, R.; Daescu, A.; Pintea, A.; Socaciu, C.; Rugina, D. , Anthocyanins as Key Phytochemicals Acting for the Prevention of Metabolic Diseases: An Overview. Molecules 2022, 27, 4254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Rahman, M.A.; Rahman, M.H.; Biswas, P.; Hossain, M.S.; Islam, R.; Hannan, M.A.; Uddin, M.J.; Rhim, H. , Potential therapeutic role of phytochemicals to mitigate mitochondrial dysfunctions in Alzheimer’s disease. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sharma, S.; Naura, A.S. , Potential of phytochemicals as immune-regulatory compounds in atopic diseases: A review. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020, 173, 113790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Shirsath, N.R.; Goswami, A.K. , Natural phytochemicals and their therapeutic role in management of several diseases: A review. Curr. Tradit. Med. 2020, 6, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Subedi, L.; Lee, S.E.; Madiha, S.; Gaire, B.P.; Jin, M.; Yumnam, S.; Kim, S.Y. , Phytochemicals against TNFα-mediated neuroinflammatory diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Wang, Y.; Wu, S.; Li, Q.; Lang, W.; Li, W.; Jiang, X.; Wan, Z.; Chen, J.; Wang, H. , Epigallocatechin-3-gallate: A phytochemical as a promising drug candidate for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 977521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Xu, T.; Lu, B. , The effects of phytochemicals on circadian rhythm and related diseases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yang, S.H.; Tao, G.; Yang, L.; Wu, X.; Liu, J.W.; Dagher, F.; Ou, S.Y.; Song, Y.; Huang, J.Q. , Dietary phytochemical and metabolic disease prevention: Focus on plant proteins. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1089487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zahedipour, F.; Hosseini, S.; Henney, N.; Barreto, G.; Sahebkar, A. , Phytochemicals as inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor alpha and neuroinflammatory responses in neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regen. Res. 2022, 17, 1675–1684. [Google Scholar]
  111. Bahadori, M.B.; Kirkan, B.; Sarikurkcu, C. , Phenolic ingredients and therapeutic potential of Stachys cretica subsp. smyrnaea for the management of oxidative stress, Alzheimer's disease, hyperglycemia, and melasma. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 127, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Barakat, A.Z.; Bassuiny, R.I.; Abdel-Aty, A.M.; Mohamed, S.A. , Diabetic complications and oxidative stress: The role of phenolic-rich extracts of saw palmetto and date palm seeds. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, e13416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Callcott, E.T.; Blanchard, C.L.; Oli, P.; Santhakumar, A.B. , Pigmented Rice-Derived Phenolic Compounds Reduce Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, 1800840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Carballeda Sangiao, N.; Chamorro, S.; de Pascual-Teresa, S.; Goya, L. , Aqueous extract of cocoa phenolic compounds protects differentiated neuroblastoma sh-sy5y cells from oxidative stress. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Castaneda-Arriaga, R.; Pérez-González, A.; Reina, M.; Alvarez-Idaboy, J.R.; Galano, A. , Comprehensive Investigation of the Antioxidant and Pro-oxidant Effects of Phenolic Compounds: A Double-Edged Sword in the Context of Oxidative Stress? J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 6198–6214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Gabbia, D.; Carpi, S.; Sarcognato, S.; Zanotto, I.; Sayaf, K.; Colognesi, M.; Polini, B.; Digiacomo, M.; Macchia, M.; Nieri, P.; Carrara, M.; Cazzagon, N.; Russo, F.P.; Guido, M.; De Martin, S. , The phenolic compounds tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol counteract liver fibrogenesis via the transcriptional modulation of NADPH oxidases and oxidative stress-related miRNAs. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 157, 114014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Hanafy, D.M.; Burrows, G.E.; Prenzler, P.D.; Hill, R.A. , Potential role of phenolic extracts of mentha in managing oxidative stress and alzheimer’s disease. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Hu, J.; Tong, C.; Zhou, J.; Gao, C.; Olatunji, O.J. , Protective Effects of Shorea roxburghii Phenolic Extract on Nephrotoxicity Induced by Cyclophosphamide: Impact on Oxidative Stress, Biochemical and Histopathological Alterations. Chem. Biodivers. 2022, 19, e202200053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Katsinas, N.; Rodríguez-Rojo, S.; Enríquez-De-salamanca, A. , Olive pomace phenolic compounds and extracts can inhibit inflammatory-and oxidative-related diseases of human ocular surface epithelium. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Kruk, J.; Aboul-Enein, B.H.; Duchnik, E.; Marchlewicz, M. , Antioxidative properties of phenolic compounds and their effect on oxidative stress induced by severe physical exercise. J. Physiol. Sci. 2022, 72, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lion, Q.; Pichette, A.; Mihoub, M.; Mshvildadze, V.; Legault, J. , Phenolic extract from aralia nudicaulis L. rhizomes inhibits cellular oxidative stresses. Molecules 2021, 26, 4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Liu, C.; Guo, H.; DaSilva, N.A.; Li, D.; Zhang, K.; Wan, Y.; Gao, X.H.; Chen, H.D.; Seeram, N.P.; Ma, H. , Pomegranate (Punica granatum) phenolics ameliorate hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress and cytotoxicity in human keratinocytes. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 54, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Oršolić, N.; Kunštić, M.; Kukolj, M.; Odeh, D.; Ančić, D. , Natural phenolic acid, product of the honey bee, for the control of oxidative stress, peritoneal angiogenesis, and tumor growth in mice. Molecules 2020, 25, 5583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ramli, I.; Posadino, A.M.; Zerizer, S.; Spissu, Y.; Barberis, A.; Djeghim, H.; Azara, E.; Bensouici, C.; Kabouche, Z.; Rebbas, K.; D'Hallewin, G.; Sechi, L.A.; Pintus, G. , Low concentrations of Ambrosia maritima L. phenolic extract protect endothelial cells from oxidative cell death induced by H2O2 and sera from Crohn's disease patients. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2023, 300, 115722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ren, Y.; Sun-Waterhouse, D.; Ouyang, F.; Tan, X.; Li, D.; Xu, L.; Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, F. , Apple phenolic extracts ameliorate lead-induced cognitive impairment and depression- and anxiety-like behavior in mice by abating oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis via the miR-22-3p/SIRT1 axis. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 2647–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sahu, R.; Dua, T.K.; Das, S.; De Feo, V.; Dewanjee, S. , Wheat phenolics suppress doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity via inhibition of oxidative stress, MAP kinase activation, NF-κB pathway, PI3K/Akt/mTOR impairment, and cardiac apoptosis. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 125, 503–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Sánchez-Medina, A.; Redondo-Puente, M.; Dupak, R.; Bravo-Clemente, L.; Goya, L.; Sarriá, B. , Colonic Coffee Phenols Metabolites, Dihydrocaffeic, Dihydroferulic, and Hydroxyhippuric Acids Protect Hepatic Cells from TNF-α-Induced Inflammation and Oxidative Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Winarsi, H.; Septiana, A.T. , Improving oxidative stress and inflammation status of obese women with metabolic syndrome using phenolic-rich red kidney bean sprout milk yogurt. Int. Food Res. J. 2022, 29, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Yener, I.; Kocakaya, S.O.; Ertas, A.; Erhan, B.; Kaplaner, E.; Oral, E.V.; Yilmaz-Ozden, T.; Yilmaz, M.A.; Ozturk, M.; Kolak, U. , Selective in vitro and in silico enzymes inhibitory activities of phenolic acids and flavonoids of food plants: Relations with oxidative stress. Food Chem. 2020, 327, 127045–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kumar, N.; Pruthi, V. , Potential applications of ferulic acid from natural sources. Biotechnol. Rep. 2014, 4, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. León-Carmona, J.R.; Alvarez-Idaboy, J.R.; Galano, A. , On the peroxyl scavenging activity of hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives: Mechanisms, kinetics, and importance of the acid-base equilibrium. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 12534–12543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, D.; Yu, B.; Huang, Z. , Dietary ferulic acid supplementation improves intestinal antioxidant capacity and intestinal barrier function in weaned piglets. Anim. Biotechnol. 2022, 33, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Han, H.; Dye, L.; Mackie, A. , The impact of processing on the release and antioxidant capacity of ferulic acid from wheat: A systematic review. Food Res. Int. 2023, 164, 112371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Horbury, M.D.; Baker, L.A.; Quan, W.D.; Greenough, S.E.; Stavros, V.G. , Photodynamics of potent antioxidants: Ferulic and caffeic acids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 17691–17697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Hwang, H.J.; Lee, S.R.; Yoon, J.G.; Moon, H.R.; Zhang, J.; Park, E.; Yoon, S.I.; Cho, J.A. , Ferulic Acid as a Protective Antioxidant of Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Itagaki, S.; Kurokawa, T.; Nakata, C.; Saito, Y.; Oikawa, S.; Kobayashi, M.; Hirano, T.; Iseki, K. , In vitro and in vivo antioxidant properties of ferulic acid: A comparative study with other natural oxidation inhibitors. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Lima, Â.C. O.; Dias, E.R.; Reis, I.M.A.; Carneiro, K.O.; Pinheiro, A.M.; Nascimento, A.S.; Silva, S.M.P.C.; Carvalho, C.A.L.; Mendonça, A.V.R.; Vieira, I.J.C.; Braz Filho, R.; Branco, A. , Ferulic acid as major antioxidant phenolic compound of the Tetragonisca angustula honey collected in Vera Cruz-Itaparica Island, Bahia, Brazil. Braz. J. Biol. 2022, 84, e253599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Rampelotto, C.R.; Pereira, V.G.; da Silva Silveira, L.; Rossato, A.; Machado, A.K.; Sagrillo, M.R.; Gündel, A.; Burger, M.E.; Schaffazick, S.R.; de Bona da Silva, C. , Ferulic acid-loaded nanocapsules: Evaluation of mucosal interaction, safety and antioxidant activity in human mononucleated cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 2022, 78, 105259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Srinivasan, M.; Sudheer, A.R.; Menon, V.P. , Ferulic acid: Therapeutic potential through its antioxidant property. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2007, 40, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Truong, D.H.; Nhung, N.T.A.; Dao, D.Q. , Iron ions chelation-based antioxidant potential vs. pro-oxidant risk of ferulic acid: A DFT study in aqueous phase. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2020, 1185, 112905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wagle, S.; Sim, H.J.; Bhattarai, G.; Choi, K.C.; Kook, S.H.; Lee, J.C.; Jeon, Y.M. , Supplemental ferulic acid inhibits total body irradiation-mediated bone marrow damage, bone mass loss, stem cell senescence, and hematopoietic defect in mice by enhancing antioxidant defense systems. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Yildiztugay, E.; Ozfidan-Konakci, C.; Karahan, H.; Kucukoduk, M.; Turkan, I. , Ferulic acid confers tolerance against excess boron by regulating ROS levels and inducing antioxidant system in wheat leaves (Triticum aestivum). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zduńska, K.; Dana, A.; Kolodziejczak, A.; Rotsztejn, H. , Antioxidant properties of ferulic acid and its possible application. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 2018, 31, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Mir, S.M.; Ravuri, H.G.; Pradhan, R.K.; Narra, S.; Kumar, J.M.; Kuncha, M.; Kanjilal, S.; Sistla, R. , Ferulic acid protects lipopolysaccharide-induced acute kidney injury by suppressing inflammatory events and upregulating antioxidant defenses in Balb/c mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 100, 304–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Yin, Z.N.; Wu, W.J.; Sun, C.Z.; Liu, H.F.; Chen, W.B.; Zhan, Q.P.; Lei, Z.G.; Xin, X.; Ma, J.J.; Yao, K.; Min, T.; Zhang, M.M.; Wu, H. , Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Capacity of Ferulic Acid Released from Wheat Bran by Solid-state Fermentation of Aspergillus niger. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2019, 32, 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  146. Amani, F.; Rezaei, A.; Kharazmi, M.S.; Jafari, S.M. , Loading ferulic acid into β-cyclodextrin nanosponges; antibacterial activity, controlled release and application in pomegranate juice as a copigment agent. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2022, 649, 129454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Borges, A.; Ferreira, C.; Saavedra, M.J.; Simões, M. , Antibacterial activity and mode of action of ferulic and gallic acids against pathogenic bacteria. Microb. Drug Resist. 2013, 19, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Ordoñez, R.; Atarés, L.; Chiralt, A. , Antibacterial properties of cinnamic and ferulic acids incorporated to starch and PLA monolayer and multilayer films. Food Control 2022, 136, 108878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Tu, Q.B.; Shi, H.C.; Li, P.; Sheng, S.; Wu, F.A. , Antibacterial Activity of Ferulic Acid Ester against Ralstonia solanacearum and Its Synergy with Essential Oils. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2022, 14, 16348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Antonopoulou, I.; Sapountzaki, E.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P. , Ferulic Acid From Plant Biomass: A Phytochemical With Promising Antiviral Properties. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 777576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Choi, J.H.; Park, J.K.; Kim, K.M.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, S. , In vitro and in vivo antithrombotic and cytotoxicity effects of ferulic acid. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2018, 32, 22004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hong, Q.; Ma, Z.C.; Huang, H.; Wang, Y.G.; Tan, H.L.; Xiao, C.R.; Liang, Q.D.; Zhang, H.T.; Gao, Y. , Antithrombotic activities of ferulic acid via intracellular cyclic nucleotide signaling. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 777, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Zduńska-Pęciak, K.; Kołodziejczak, A.; Rotsztejn, H. , Two superior antioxidants: Ferulic acid and ascorbic acid in reducing signs of photoaging—A split-face comparative study. Dermatol. Ther. 2022, 35, e15254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Fukuda, T.; Kuroda, T.; Kono, M.; Hyoguchi, M.; Tanaka, M.; Matsui, T. , Augmentation of ferulic acid-induced vasorelaxation with aging and its structure importance in thoracic aorta of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 2015, 388, 1113–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Yang, H.; Qu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Huo, L.; Gao, J.; Gao, W. , Ferulic acid ameliorates memory impairment in d-galactose-induced aging mouse model. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 67, 806–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Kumar, N.; Kumar, S.; Abbat, S.; Nikhil, K.; Sondhi, S.M.; Bharatam, P.V.; Roy, P.; Pruthi, V. , Ferulic acid amide derivatives as anticancer and antioxidant agents: synthesis, thermal, biological and computational studies. Med. Chem. Res. 2016, 25, 1175–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Ani, G.; Tanya, T.Y.; Reneta, T. , Antitumor and apoptogenic effects of ferulic acid on cervical carcinoma cells. Res. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 16, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  158. Bakholdina, L.A.; Markova, A.A.; Khlebnikov, A.I.; Sevodin, V.P. , Cytotoxicity of New Ferulic-Acid Derivatives on Human Colon Carcinoma (HCT116) Cells. Pharm. Chem. J. 2019, 53, 516–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Cao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Tang, J.; Wang, R. , Ferulic Acid Mitigates Growth and Invasion of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma through Inducing Ferroptotic Cell Death. Dis. Markers 2022, 2022, 4607966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Cui, K.; Wu, H.; Fan, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, H.; Guo, H.; Yang, R.; Li, Z. , The Mixture of Ferulic Acid and P-Coumaric Acid Suppresses Colorectal Cancer through lncRNA 495810/PKM2 Mediated Aerobic Glycolysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Damasceno, S.S.; Dantas, B.B.; Ribeiro-Filho, J.; Araújo, D.A.M.; Da Costa, J.G.M. , Chemical properties of caffeic and ferulic acids in biological system: Implications in cancer therapy. A review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 3015–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Dodurga, Y.; Eroğlu, C.; Seçme, M.; Elmas, L.; Avcı, Ç.B.; Şatıroğlu-Tufan, N.L. , Anti-proliferative and anti-invasive effects of ferulic acid in TT medullary thyroid cancer cells interacting with URG4/URGCP. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 1933–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. El-Gogary, R.I.; Nasr, M.; Rahsed, L.A.; Hamzawy, M.A. , Ferulic acid nanocapsules as a promising treatment modality for colorectal cancer: Preparation and in vitro/in vivo appraisal. Life Sci. 2022, 298, 120500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. ElKhazendar, M.; Chalak, J.; El-Huneidi, W.; Vinod, A.; Abdel-Rahman, W.M.; Abu-Gharbieh, E. , Antiproliferative and proapoptotic activities of ferulic acid in breast and liver cancer cell lines. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2019, 18, 2571–2576. [Google Scholar]
  165. Eroğlu, C.; Seçme, M.; Bağcı, G.; Dodurga, Y. , Assessment of the anticancer mechanism of ferulic acid via cell cycle and apoptotic pathways in human prostate cancer cell lines. Tumor Biol. 2015, 36, 9437–9446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Fahrioğlu, U.; Dodurga, Y.; Elmas, L.; Seçme, M. , Ferulic acid decreases cell viability and colony formation while inhibiting migration of MIA PaCa-2 human pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. Gene 2016, 576, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Gao, J.; Yu, H.; Guo, W.; Kong, Y.; Gu; Li, Q. ; Yang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y., The anticancer effects of ferulic acid is associated with induction of cell cycle arrest and autophagy in cervical cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2018, 18, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Gupta, A.; Singh, A.K.; Loka, M.; Pandey, A.K.; Bishayee, A. , Ferulic acid-mediated modulation of apoptotic signaling pathways in cancer. In Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol., 2021; Vol. 125, pp 215-257.
  169. Luo, L.; Zhu, S.; Tong, Y.; Peng, S. , Ferulic acid induces apoptosis of HeLa and caski cervical carcinoma cells by down-regulating the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling pathway. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e920095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zhang, X.; Lin, D.; Jiang, R.; Li, H.; Wan, J.; Li, H. , Ferulic acid exerts antitumor activity and inhibits metastasis in breast cancer cells by regulating epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 36, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Alam, M.A.; Sernia, C.; Brown, L. , Ferulic acid improves cardiovascular and kidney structure and function in hypertensive rats. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2013, 61, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Li, C.; Chen, L.; Song, M.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Coffie, J.W.; Zhang, L.; Ma, L.; Wang, Q.; Yang, W.; Fang, L.; Wang, S.; Gao, X.; Wang, H. , Ferulic acid protects cardiomyocytes from TNF-α/cycloheximide-induced apoptosis by regulating autophagy. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2020, 43, 863–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Monceaux, K.; Gressette, M.; Karoui, A.; Pires Da Silva, J.; Piquereau, J.; Ventura-Clapier, R.; Garnier, A.; Mericskay, M.; Lemaire, C. , Ferulic Acid, Pterostilbene, and Tyrosol Protect the Heart from ER-Stress-Induced Injury by Activating SIRT1-Dependent Deacetylation of eIF2α. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Neto-Neves, E.M.; Filho, C.D.S.M.B.; Dejani, N.N.; de Sousa, D.P. , Ferulic acid and cardiovascular health: Therapeutic and preventive potential. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 1625–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Pandi, A.; Raghu, M.H.; Chandrashekar, N.; Kalappan, V.M. , Cardioprotective effects of Ferulic acid against various drugs and toxic agents. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2022, 11, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Salau, V.F.; Erukainure, O.L.; Olofinsan, K.A.; Msomi, N.Z.; Ijomone, O.K.; Islam, M.S. , Ferulic acid mitigates diabetic cardiomyopathy via modulation of metabolic abnormalities in cardiac tissues of diabetic rats. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2023, 37, 44–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Zhang, X.X.; Zhao, D.S.; Wang, J.; Zhou, H.; Wang, L.; Mao, J.L.; He, J.X. , The treatment of cardiovascular diseases: A review of ferulic acid and its derivatives. Pharmazie 2021, 76, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  178. Ren, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, R.; Li, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yang, H. , Ferulic acid exerts neuroprotective effects against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury via antioxidant and anti-apoptotic mechanisms in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 40, 1444–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Di Giacomo, S.; Percaccio, E.; Gullì, M.; Romano, A.; Vitalone, A.; Mazzanti, G.; Gaetani, S.; Di Sotto, A. , Recent Advances in the Neuroprotective Properties of Ferulic Acid in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Dong, X.; Huang, R. , Ferulic acid: An extraordinarily neuroprotective phenolic acid with anti-depressive properties. Phytomedicine 2022, 105, 154355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Hassanzadeh, P.; Arbabi, E.; Atyabi, F.; Dinarvand, R. , Ferulic acid, a phenolic compound with therapeutic effects in neuropsychiatric disorders, stimulates the production of nerve growth factor and endocannabinoids in rat brain. Physiol. Pharmacol. (Iran) 2017, 21, 279–294. [Google Scholar]
  182. Liu, G.; Nie, Y.; Huang, C.; Zhu, G.; Zhang, X.; Hu, C.; Li, Z.; Gao, Y.; Ma, Z. , Ferulic acid produces neuroprotection against radiation-induced neuroinflammation by affecting NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Int. J. Radia. Biol. 2022, 98, 1442–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Liu, Y.M.; Shen, J.D.; Xu, L.P.; Li, H.B.; Li, Y.C.; Yi, L.T. , Ferulic acid inhibits neuro-inflammation in mice exposed to chronic unpredictable mild stress. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 45, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Long, T.; Wu, Q.; Wei, J.; Tang, Y.; He, Y.N.; He, C.L.; Chen, X.; Yu, L.; Yu, C.L.; Law, B.Y.; Wu, J.M.; Qin, D.L.; Wu, A.G.; Zhou, X.G. , Ferulic Acid Exerts Neuroprotective Effects via Autophagy Induction in C. elegans and Cellular Models of Parkinson’s Disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 3723567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Ojha, S.; Javed, H.; Azimullah, S.; Khair, S.B.A.; Haque, M.E. , Neuroprotective potential of ferulic acid in the rotenone model of Parkinson’s disease. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2015, 9, 5499–5510. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  186. Singh, S.; Arthur, R.; Upadhayay, S.; Kumar, P. , Ferulic acid ameliorates neurodegeneration via the Nrf2/ARE signalling pathway: A Review. Pharmacol. Res. - Modern Chinese Med. 2022, 5, 100190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Thapliyal, S.; Singh, T.; Handu, S.; Bisht, M.; Kumari, P.; Arya, P.; Srivastava, P.; Gandham, R. , A Review on Potential Footprints of Ferulic Acid for Treatment of Neurological Disorders. Neurochem. Res. 2021, 46, 1043–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Yin, C.L.; Lu, R.G.; Zhu, J.F.; Huang, H.M.; Liu, X.; Li, Q.F.; Mo, Y.Y.; Zhu, H.J.; Chin, B.; Wu, J.X.; Liu, X.W.; Cheng, B.; Ruan, J.X.; Liang, Y.H.; Song, H.; Guo, H.W.; Su, Z.H.; Zheng, H. , The study of neuroprotective effect of ferulic acid based on cell metabolomics. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 864, 172694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Alam, M.A. , Anti-hypertensive Effect of Cereal Antioxidant Ferulic Acid and Its Mechanism of Action. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Ardiansyah; Ohsaki, Y. ; Shirakawa, H.; Koseki, T.; Komai, M., Novel effects of a single administration of ferulic acid on the regulation of blood pressure and the hepatic lipid metabolic profile in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 2825–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. El-Bassossy, H.; Badawy, D.; Neamatallah, T.; Fahmy, A. , Ferulic acid, a natural polyphenol, alleviates insulin resistance and hypertension in fructose fed rats: Effect on endothelial-dependent relaxation. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2016, 254, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Suzuki, A.; Yamamoto, M.; Jokura, H.; Fujii, A.; Tokimitsu, I.; Hase, T.; Saito, I. , Ferulic Acid Restores Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation in Aortas of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Am. J. Hypertens. 2007, 20, 508–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Lenzi, J.; Rodrigues, A.F.; Rós, A.S.; de Castro, B.B.; de Lima, D.D.; Magro, D.D.D.; Zeni, A.L.B. , Ferulic acid chronic treatment exerts antidepressant-like effect: role of antioxidant defense system. Metab. Brain Dis. 2015, 30, 1453–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Chen, J.; Lin, D.; Zhang, C.; Li, G.; Zhang, N.; Ruan, L.; Yan, Q.; Li, J.; Yu, X.; Xie, X.; Pang, C.; Cao, L.; Pan, J.; Xu, Y. , Antidepressant-like effects of ferulic acid: involvement of serotonergic and norepinergic systems. Metab. Brain Dis. 2015, 30, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Deng, L.; Zhou, X.; Tao, G.; Hao, W.; Wang, L.; Lan, Z.; Song, Y.; Wu, M.; Huang, J.Q. , Ferulic acid and feruloylated oligosaccharides alleviate anxiety and depression symptom via regulating gut microbiome and microbial metabolism. Food Res. Int. 2022, 162, 111887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Sasaki, K.; Iwata, N.; Ferdousi, F.; Isoda, H. , Antidepressant-Like Effect of Ferulic Acid via Promotion of Energy Metabolism Activity. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2019, 63, e1900327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Singh, T.; Kaur, T.; Goel, R.K. , Ferulic Acid Supplementation for Management of Depression in Epilepsy. Neurochem. Res. 2017, 42, 2940–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Zheng, X.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yue, Y.; Li, Y.; Xia, S.; Li, Y.; Deng, H.; Zhang, J.; Cao, Y. , Ferulic acid improves depressive-like behavior in prenatally-stressed offspring rats via anti-inflammatory activity and HPA axis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Krishnan, D.N.; Prasanna, N.; Sabina, E.P.; Rasool, M.K. , Hepatoprotective and antioxidant potential of ferulic acid against acetaminophen-induced liver damage in mice. Comp. Clin. Path. 2013, 22, 1177–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Esmat, M.A.; Osman, A.; Hassan, R.E.; Hagag, S.A.; El-maghraby, T.K. , Hepatoprotective effect of ferulic acid and/or low doses of γ-irradiation against cisplatin-induced liver injury in rats. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2022, 41, 9603271221136205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Gerin, F.; Erman, H.; Erboga, M.; Sener, U.; Yilmaz, A.; Seyhan, H.; Gurel, A. , The Effects of Ferulic Acid Against Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Formaldehyde-Induced Hepatotoxicity. Inflammation 2016, 39, 1377–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Hussein, R.M.; Anwar, M.M.; Farghaly, H.S.; Kandeil, M.A. , Gallic acid and ferulic acid protect the liver from thioacetamide-induced fibrosis in rats via differential expression of miR-21, miR-30 and miR-200 and impact on TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2020, 324, 109098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Luo, Z.; Li, M.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, F.; Gong, L.; Han, L.; Wang, M. , Ferulic Acid Prevents Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease by Promoting Fatty Acid Oxidation and Energy Expenditure in C57BL/6 Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Ma, Y.; Chen, K.; Lv, L.; Wu, S.; Guo, Z. , Ferulic acid ameliorates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and modulates the gut microbiota composition in high-fat diet fed ApoE −/− mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 113, 108753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Mahmoud, A.M.; Hussein, O.E.; Hozayen, W.G.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Abd El-Twab, S.M. , Ferulic acid prevents oxidative stress, inflammation, and liver injury via upregulation of Nrf2/HO-1 signaling in methotrexate-induced rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 7910–7921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Roghani, M.; Kalantari, H.; Khodayar, M.J.; Khorsandi, L.; Kalantar, M.; Goudarzi, M.; Kalantar, H. , Alleviation of liver dysfunction, oxidative stress and inflammation underlies the protective effect of ferulic acid in methotrexate-induced hepatotoxicity. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2020, 14, 1933–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Tawfik, M.S.; Saif-Elnasr, M.; Elkady, A.A.; Alkady, M.M.; Hawas, A.M. , Protective role of ferulic acid against the damaging effect induced by electromagnetic waves on rat liver and intestine tissues. Int. J. Radiat. Res. 2018, 16, 421–430. [Google Scholar]
  208. Wu, J.; Xue, X.; Fan, G.; Gu, Y.; Zhou, F.; Zheng, Q.; Liu, R.; Li, Y.; Ma, B.; Li, S.; Huang, G.; Ma, L.; Li, X. , Ferulic Acid Ameliorates Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrotic Liver Injury by Inhibiting PTP1B Activity and Subsequent Promoting AMPK Phosphorylation. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 754976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Wu, J.; Zhou, F.; Fan, G.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Xue, X.; Lyu, X.; Lin, S.; Li, X. , Ferulic acid ameliorates acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury by promoting AMPK-mediated protective autophagy. IUBMB Life 2022, 74, 880–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Xu, T.; Song, Q.; Zhou, L.; Yang, W.; Wu, X.; Qian, Q.; Chai, H.; Han, Q.; Pan, H.; Dou, X.; Li, S. , Ferulic acid alleviates lipotoxicity-induced hepatocellular death through the SIRT1-regulated autophagy pathway and independently of AMPK and Akt in AML-12 hepatocytes. Nutr. Metab. 2021, 18, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Bairagi, U.; Mittal, P.; Singh, J.; Mishra, B. , Preparation, characterization, and in vivo evaluation of nano formulations of ferulic acid in diabetic wound healing. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2018, 44, 1783–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Ghosh, S.; Chowdhury, S.; Sarkar, P.; Sil, P.C. , Ameliorative role of ferulic acid against diabetes associated oxidative stress induced spleen damage. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 118, 272–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Li, J.; Bai, L.; Ma, H.; Guo, H. , Ferulic acid alleviates diabetic cardiomyopathy in mice via decreasing blood glucose, reducing inflammation and down-regulating TLR-4/NF-κB pathway. Lat. Am. J. Pharm. 2021, 40, 1445–1450. [Google Scholar]
  214. Li, X.; Wu, J.; Xu, F.; Chu, C.; Li, X.; Shi, X.; Zheng, W.; Wang, Z.; Jia, Y.; Xiao, W. , Use of Ferulic Acid in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications. Molecules 2022, 27, 6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Panwar, R.; Raghuwanshi, N.; Srivastava, A.K.; Sharma, A.K.; Pruthi, V. , In-vivo sustained release of nanoencapsulated ferulic acid and its impact in induced diabetes. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2018, 92, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Salau, V.F.; Erukainure, O.L.; Olofinsan, K.O.; Bharuth, V.; Ijomone, O.M.; Islam, M.S. , Ferulic acid improves glucose homeostasis by modulation of key diabetogenic activities and restoration of pancreatic architecture in diabetic rats. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2023, 37, 324–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Zhao, J.; Gao, J.; Li, H. , Ferulic acid confers protection on islet β cells and placental tissues of rats with gestational diabetes mellitus. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2020, 66, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Hasanvand, A.; Kharazmkia, A.; Mir, S.; Khorramabadi, R.M.; Darabi, S. , Ameliorative effect of ferulic acid on gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in a rat model; role of antioxidant effects. J. Ren. Inj. Prev. 2018, 7, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Adeyemi, O.S.; Atolani, O.; Banerjee, P.; Arolasafe, G.; Preissner, R.; Etukudoh, P.; Ibraheem, O. , Computational and experimental validation of antioxidant properties of synthesized bioactive ferulic acid derivatives. Int. J. Food Prop. 2018, 21, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Adeyemi, O.S.; Awakan, O.J.; Atolani, O.; Iyeye, C.O.; Oweibo, O.O.; Adejumo, O.J.; Ibrahim, A.; Batiha, G.E.S. , New ferulic acid derivatives protect against carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury in rats. Open Biochem. J. 2019, 13, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Bautista-Aguilera, O.M.; Alonso, J.M.; Catto, M.; Iriepa, I.; Knez, D.; Gobec, S.; Marco-Contelles, J. , N-Hydroxy-N-Propargylamide Derivatives of Ferulic Acid: Inhibitors of Cholinesterases and Monoamine Oxidases. Molecules 2022, 27, 7437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Borgohain, R.; Handique, J.G.; Guha, A.K.; Pratihar, S. , A theoretical study on antioxidant activity of ferulic acid and its ester derivatives. J. Theor. Comput. Chem. 2016, 15, 1650028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Cui, M.Y.; Xiao, M.W.; Xu, L.J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, A.L.; Ye, J.; Hu, A.X. , Bioassay of ferulic acid derivatives as influenza neuraminidase inhibitors. Arch. Pharm. 2020, 353, e1900174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. de Paiva, L.B.; Goldbeck, R.; dos Santos, W.D.; Squina, F.M. , Ferulic acid and derivatives: Molecules with potential application in the pharmaceutical field. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 49, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Drăgan, M.; Stan, C.D.; Iacob, A.; Profire, L. , Assessment of in vitro antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of new azetidin-2-one derivatives of ferulic acid. Farmacia 2016, 64, 717–721. [Google Scholar]
  226. Drăgan, M.; Stan, C.D.; Iacob, A.T.; Dragostin, O.M.; Boancă, M.; Lupuşoru, C.E.; Zamfir, C.L.; Profire, L. , Biological evaluation of azetidine-2-one derivatives of ferulic acid as promising anti-inflammatory agents. Processes 2020, 8, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Ekowati, J.; Diyah, N.W.; Nofianti, K.A.; Hamid, I.S. ; Siswandono, Molecular docking of ferulic acid derivatives on P2Y12 receptor and their ADMET prediction. J. Math. Fundam. Sci. 2018, 50, 203–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Hernández-García, L.; Sandoval-Lira, J.; Rosete-Luna, S.; Niño-Medina, G.; Sanchez, M. , Theoretical study of ferulic acid dimer derivatives: bond dissociation enthalpy, spin density, and HOMO-LUMO analysis. Struct. Chem. 2018, 29, 1265–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Jung, J.S.; Yan, J.J.; Li, H.M.; Sultan, M.T.; Yu, J.; Lee, H.S.; Shin, K.J.; Song, D.K. , Protective effects of a dimeric derivative of ferulic acid in animal models of Alzheimer's disease. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 782, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Khatkar, A.; Nanda, A.; Kumar, P.; Narasimhan, B. , Synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of ferulic acid derivatives. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2015, 41, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Kikugawa, M.; Tsutsuki, H.; Ida, T.; Nakajima, H.; Ihara, H.; Sakamoto, T. , Water-soluble ferulic acid derivatives improve amyloid-β-induced neuronal cell death and dysmnesia through inhibition of amyloid-β aggregation. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2016, 80, 547–553A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Kolaj, I.; Wang, Y.; Ye, K.; Meek, A.; Liyanage, S.I.; Santos, C.; Weaver, D.F. , Ferulic acid amide derivatives with varying inhibition of amyloid-β oligomerization and fibrillization. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2021, 43, 116247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Kumar, N.; Goel, N.; Chand Yadav, T.; Pruthi, V. , Quantum chemical, ADMET and molecular docking studies of ferulic acid amide derivatives with a novel anticancer drug target. Med. Chem. Res. 2017, 26, 1822–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Lan, J.S.; Zeng, R.F.; Jiang, X.Y.; Hou, J.W.; Liu, Y.; Hu, Z.H.; Li, H.X.; Li, Y.; Xie, S.S.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, T. , Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel ferulic acid derivatives as multi-target-directed ligands for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 94, 103413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Li, D.; Rui, Y.X.; Guo, S.D.; Luan, F.; Liu, R.; Zeng, N. , Ferulic acid: A review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and derivatives. Life Sci. 2021, 284, 119921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Li, W.; Li, N.; Tang, Y.; Li, B.; Liu, L.; Zhang, X.; Fu, H.; Duan, J.A. , Biological activity evaluation and structure-activity relationships analysis of ferulic acid and caffeic acid derivatives for anticancer. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 6085–6088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Liang, Y.; Xi, X.; Liu, Q.; Huang, P.; Li, J.; Lin, Q. , Research progress on the physiological activity and application of ferulic acid and its derivatives. J. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 37, 449–454. [Google Scholar]
  238. Malik, S.A.; Ali, K.F.; Dawood, A.H. , Synthesis, Characterization, and Preliminary Evaluation of Ferulic Acid Derivatives Containing Heterocyclic Moiety. J. Med. Chem. Sci. 2023, 6, 1444–1456. [Google Scholar]
  239. Montaser, A.; Huttunen, J.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Huttunen, K.M. , Astrocyte-Targeted Transporter-Utilizing Derivatives of Ferulic Acid Can Have Multifunctional Effects Ameliorating Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in the Brain. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 3528148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Pasquereau, S.; Galais, M.; Bellefroid, M.; Pachón Angona, I.; Morot-Bizot, S.; Ismaili, L.; Van Lint, C.; Herbein, G. , Ferulic acid derivatives block coronaviruses HCoV-229E and SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 20309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Phadke, A.V.; Tayade, A.A.; Khambete, M.P. , Therapeutic potential of ferulic acid and its derivatives in Alzheimer’s disease—A systematic review. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2021, 98, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Pinheiro, P.; Santiago, G.; Da Silva, F.; De Araujo, A.; De Oliveira, C.; Freitas, P.; Rocha, J.; De Araujo Neto, J.; Da Silva, M.; Tintino, S.; De Menezes, I.; Coutinho, H.; Da Costa, J. , Antibacterial activity and inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus NorA efflux pump by ferulic acid and its esterified derivatives. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2021, 11, 405–413. [Google Scholar]
  243. Pinheiro, P.G.; Santiago, G.M.P.; da Silva, F.E.F.; de Araújo, A.C.J.; de Oliveira, C.R.T.; Freitas, P.R.; Rocha, J.E.; Neto, J.B.D.A.; da Silva, M.M.C.; Tintino, S.R.; Siyadatpanah, A.; Norouzi, R.; Dashti, S.; Wilairatana, P.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; da Costa, J.G.M. , Ferulic acid derivatives inhibiting Staphylococcus aureus tetK and MsrA efflux pumps. Biotechnol. Rep. 2022, 34, e00717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Sang, Z.; Pan, W.; Wang, K.; Ma, Q.; Yu, L.; Yang, Y.; Bai, P.; Leng, C.; Xu, Q.; Li, X.; Tan, Z.; Liu, W. , Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel ferulic acid-O-alkylamine derivatives as potential multifunctional agents for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 130, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Sang, Z.; Wang, K.; Han, X.; Cao, M.; Tan, Z.; Liu, W. , Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel Ferulic Acid Derivatives as Multi-Target-Directed Ligands for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 1008–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Senthil, R.; Sakthivel, M.; Usha, S. , Structure-based drug design of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma inhibitors: ferulic acid and derivatives. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 39, 1295–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Serafim, T.L.; Carvalho, F.S.; Marques, M.P.M.; Calheiros, R.; Silva, T.; Garrido, J.; Milhazes, N.; Borges, F.; Roleira, F.; Silva, E.T.; Holy, J.; Oliveira, P.J. , Lipophilic caffeic and ferulic acid derivatives presenting cytotoxicity against human breast cancer cells. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2011, 24, 763–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Shi, Y.; Chen, X.; Qiang, S.; Su, J.; Li, J. , Anti-oxidation and anti-inflammatory potency evaluation of ferulic acid derivatives obtained through virtual screening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Wang, D.; Guo, D.; Tang, Y.; Qi, M.; Fang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chai, Y.; Cao, Y.; Lv, D. , A multi-omics study of the anti-cancer effect of a ferulic acid derivative FA-30. Mol. Omics 2022, 18, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Wang, F.; Yang, L.; Huang, K.; Li, X.; Hao, X.; Stöckigt, J.; Zhao, Y. , Preparation of ferulic acid derivatives and evaluation of their xanthine oxidase inhibition activity. Nat. Prod. Res. 2007, 21 (3), 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Wang, Z.; Xie, D.; Gan, X.; Zeng, S.; Zhang, A.; Yin, L.; Song, B.; Jin, L.; Hu, D. , Synthesis, antiviral activity, and molecular docking study of trans-ferulic acid derivatives containing acylhydrazone moiety. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 4096–4100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Wu, J.; Yin, W.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, H.; Li, Y.; Tian, J.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y. , Design and synthesis of the ring-opened derivative of 3-n-butylphthalide-ferulic acid-glucose trihybrids as potential anti-ischemic agents. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 1881–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Wu, Y.; Shi, Y.G.; Zheng, X.L.; Dang, Y.L.; Zhu, C.M.; Zhang, R.R.; Fu, Y.Y.; Zhou, T.Y.; Li, J.H. , Lipophilic ferulic acid derivatives protect PC12 cells against oxidative damage: Via modulating β-amyloid aggregation and activating Nrf2 enzymes. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 4707–4718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Wu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Pan, J.; Zhao, L.; Liu, D.; Zhang, A.; Chen, J.; Hu, D.; Song, B. , Design, synthesis, antiviral bioactivity and three-dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship study of novel ferulic acid ester derivatives containing quinazoline moiety. Pest Manage. Sci. 2017, 73, 2079–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Xie, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, J.; Zheng, L. , Synthesis of mitochondria-targeted ferulic acid amide derivatives with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory activities and inducing mitophagy. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 127, 106037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Yuan, T.; Wang, Z.; Lan, S.; Gan, X. , Design, synthesis, antiviral activity, and mechanisms of novel ferulic acid derivatives containing amide moiety. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 128, 106054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Yuan, T.; Wang, Z.; Liu, D.; Zeng, H.; Liang, J.; Hu, D.; Gan, X. , Ferulic acid derivatives with piperazine moiety as potential antiviral agents. Pest Manage. Sci. 2022, 78, 1749–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. Yue, S.J.; Zhang, P.X.; Zhu, Y.; Li, N.G.; Chen, Y.Y.; Li, J.J.; Zhang, S.; Jin, R.Y.; Yan, H.; Shi, X.Q.; Tang, Y.P.; Duan, J.A. , A ferulic acid derivative FXS-3 inhibits proliferation and metastasis of human lung cancer A549 cells via positive JNK signaling pathway and negative ERK/p38, AKt/mTOR and MEK/ERK signaling pathways. Molecules 2019, 24, 2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. Zhang, P.X.; Lin, H.; Qu, C.; Tang, Y.P.; Li, N.G.; Kai, J.; Shang, G.; Li, B.; Zhang, L.; Yan, H.; Liu, P.; Duan, J.A. , Design, synthesis, and in vitro antiplatelet aggregation activities of ferulic acid derivatives. J. Chem. 2015, 2015, 376527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Kong, H.; Fu, X.; Chang, X.; Ding, Z.; Yu, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, R.; Shan, Y.; Ding, S. , The ester derivatives of ferulic acid exhibit strong inhibitory effect on the growth of Alternaria alternata in vitro and in vivo. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2023, 196, 112158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Pellerito, C.; Emanuele, S.; Ferrante, F.; Celesia, A.; Giuliano, M.; Fiore, T. , Tributyltin(IV) ferulate, a novel synthetic ferulic acid derivative, induces autophagic cell death in colon cancer cells: From chemical synthesis to biochemical effects. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2020, 205, 110999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Wang, F.; Peng, Q.; Liu, J.; Alolga, R.N.; Zhou, W. , A novel ferulic acid derivative attenuates myocardial cell hypoxia reoxygenation injury through a succinate dehydrogenase dependent antioxidant mechanism. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 856, 172417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Gan, X.; Zhang, W.; Lan, S.; Hu, D. , Novel Cyclized Derivatives of Ferulic Acid as Potential Antiviral Agents through Activation of Photosynthesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 1369–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Machado, K.C.; Oliveira, G.L.S.; Islam, M.T.; Junior, A.L.G.; De Sousa, D.P.; Freitas, R.M. , Anticonvulsant and behavioral effects observed in mice following treatment with an ester derivative of ferulic acid: Isopentyl ferulate. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2015, 242, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Marucci, G.; Buccioni, M.; Ben, D.D.; Lambertucci, C.; Volpini, R.; Amenta, F. , Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropharmacology 2021, 190, 108352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Moreta, M.P.G.; Burgos-Alonso, N.; Torrecilla, M.; Marco-Contelles, J.; Bruzos-Cidón, C. , Efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors on cognitive function in alzheimer’s disease. Review of reviews. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Uddin, M.S.; Al Mamun, A.; Kabir, M.T.; Ashraf, G.M.; Bin-Jumah, M.N.; Abdel-Daim, M.M. , Multi-Target Drug Candidates for Multifactorial Alzheimer’s Disease: AChE and NMDAR as Molecular Targets. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021, 58, 281–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Finberg, J.P.M. , Inhibitors of MAO-B and COMT: their effects on brain dopamine levels and uses in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm. 2019, 126, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Jost, W.H. , A critical appraisal of MAO-B inhibitors in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm. 2022, 129, 723–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Özdemir, Z.; Alagöz, M.A.; Bahçecioğlu, Ö.F.; Gök, S. , Monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors in the treatment of alzheimer’s and parkinson’s disease. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, 28, 6045–6065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  271. Parambi, D.G.T. , Treatment of parkinson’s disease by MAO-B inhibitors, new therapies and future challenges - A mini-review. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2020, 23, 847–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Müller, T. , Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors in Parkinson's disease. Drugs 2015, 75, 157–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Nakamagoe, K.; Tsuji, H.; Ishii, K.; Tamaoka, A. , Remarkable clinical responses of non-fluctuating Parkinson’s disease (PD) after alternating catechol O-methyltransferase inhibitors: case series switching from entacapone 200 ~ 300 mg/day to opicapone 25 mg/day. Neurol. Sci. 2021, 42, 4813–4814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Fabbri, M.; Ferreira, J.J.; Rascol, O. , COMT Inhibitors in the Management of Parkinson’s Disease. CNS Drugs 2022, 36, 261–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. St. Onge, E.; Vanderhoof, M.; Miller, S., Opicapone (Ongentys): A New COMT Inhibitor for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. Ann. Pharmacother. 2021, 55, 1159–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Calculation of molecular properties and bioactivity score. https://www.molinspiration.com/cgibin/ properties (2021).
  277. Drug Likeness Tool (DruLiTo 1). http://www.niper.gov.in/pi_dev_tools/DruLiToWeb/DruLiTo_index.html (February 8, 2020).
  278. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. , Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001, 46, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Ghose, A.K.; Viswanadhan, V.N.; Wendoloski, J.J. , A Knowledge-Based Approach in Designing Combinatorial or Medicinal Chemistry Libraries for Drug Discovery. 1. A Qualitative and Quantitative Characterization of Known Drug Databases. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Veber, D.F.; Johnson, S.R.; Cheng, H.Y.; Smith, B.R.; Ward, K.W.; Kopple, K.D. , Molecular Properties That Influence the Oral Bioavailability of Drug Candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2615–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Boda, K.; Seidel, T.; Gasteiger, J. , Structure and reaction based evaluation of synthetic accessibility. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2007, 21, 311–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Bonnet, P. , Is chemical synthetic accessibility computationally predictable for drug and lead-like molecules? A comparative assessment between medicinal and computational chemists. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 54, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Zhu, H.; Tropsha, A.; Fourches, D.; Varnek, A.; Papa, E.; Gramatica, P.; Öberg, T.; Dao, P.; Cherkasov, A.; Tetko, I.V. , Combinatorial QSAR Modeling of Chemical Toxicants Tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis. J. Chem. Inf. Mode. 2008, 48, 766–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Li, X.; Caricato, M.; Marenich, A.V.; Bloino, J.; Janesko, B.G.; Gomperts, R.; Mennucci, B.; Hratchian, H.P.; Ortiz, J.V.; Izmaylov, A.F.; Sonnenberg, J.L. ; Williams; Ding, F.; Lipparini, F.; Egidi, F.; Goings, J.; Peng, B.; Petrone, A.; Henderson, T.; Ranasinghe, D.; Zakrzewski, V.G.; Gao, J.; Rega, N.; Zheng, G.; Liang, W.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Throssell, K.; Montgomery Jr., J.A.; Peralta, J.E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M.J.; Heyd, J.J.; Brothers, E.N.; Kudin, K.N.; Staroverov, V.N.; Keith, T.A.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A.P.; Burant, J.C.; Iyengar, S.S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.; Millam, J.M.; Klene, M.; Adamo, C.; Cammi, R.; Ochterski, J.W.; Martin, R.L.; Morokuma, K.; Farkas, O.; Foresman, J.B.; Fox, D.J. Gaussian 16 Rev. C.01 Wallingford, CT, 2016.
  285. Marenich, A.V.; Cramer, C.J.; Truhlar, D.G. , Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 6378–6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. Zhao, Y.; Schultz, N.E.; Truhlar, D.G. , Design of Density Functionals by Combining the Method of Constraint Satisfaction with Parametrization for Thermochemistry, Thermochemical Kinetics, and Noncovalent Interactions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2006, 2, 364–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Wu, W. h.; Lei, P.; Liu, Q.; Hu, J.; Gunn, A.P.; Chen, M. s.; Rui, Y. f.; Su, X. y.; Xie, Z. p.; Zhao, Y.F. , Sequestration of Copper from β-Amyloid Promotes Selective Lysis by Cyclen-Hybrid Cleavage Agents. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 31657–31664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Milenković, D.; Dorović, J.; Jeremić, S.; Dimitrić Marković, J.M.; Avdović, E.H.; Marković, Z. , Free Radical Scavenging Potency of Dihydroxybenzoic Acids. J. Chem. 2017, 2017, 5936239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Amić, A.; Marković, Z.; Dimitrić Marković, J.M.; Lučić, B.; Stepanić, V.; Amić, D. , The 2H+/2e- free radical scavenging mechanisms of uric acid: Thermodynamics of N-H bond cleavage. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2016, 1077, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Dorović, J.; Marković, J.M.D.; Stepanić, V.; Begović, N.; Amić, D.; Marković, Z. , Influence of different free radicals on scavenging potency of gallic acid. J. Mol. Model. 2014, 20, 2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Marković, Z.; Crossed, D.; Signorović, J.; Dekić, M.; Radulović, M.; Marković, S.; Ilić, M. , DFT study of free radical scavenging activity of erodiol. Chem. Pap. 2013, 67, 1453–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Galano, A.; Alvarez-Idaboy, J.R.; Francisco-Márquez, M. , Physicochemical Insights on the Free Radical Scavenging Activity of Sesamol: Importance of the Acid/Base Equilibrium. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 13101–13109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Ortiz, J.V. , Toward an Exact One-Electron Picture of Chemical Bonding. In Advances in Quantum Chemistry, Academic Press Inc.: 1999; Vol. 35, pp 33-52.
  294. Ortiz, J.V. , Electron propagator theory: an approach to prediction and interpretation in quantum chemistry. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2013, 3, 123–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Pérez-González, A.; Galano, A.; Ortiz, J.V. , Vertical ionization energies of free radicals and electron detachment energies of their anions: a comparison of direct and indirect methods versus experiment. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 6125–6131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Ortiz, J.V. , The Electron Propagator Picture of Molecular Electronic Structure. In Computational Chemistry: Reviews of Current Trends, WORLD SCIENTIFIC: 1997; Vol. Volume 2, pp 1-61.
  297. Marvin, 23.4.0; Chemaxon Ltd.: 2023.
  298. Ellermann, M.; Lerner, C.; Burgy, G.; Ehler, A.; Bissantz, C.; Jakob-Roetne, R.; Paulini, R.; Allemann, O.; Tissot, H.; Grünstein, D.; Stihle, M.; Diederich, F.; Rudolph, M.G. , Catechol-O-methyltransferase in complex with substituted 3́-deoxyribose bisubstrate inhibitors. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 2012, 68, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Binda, C.; Wang, J.; Pisani, L.; Caccia, C.; Carotti, A.; Salvati, P.; Edmondson, D.E.; Mattevi, A. , Structures of human monoamine oxidase B complexes with selective noncovalent inhibitors: Safinamide and coumarin analogs. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 5848–5852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  300. Cheung, J.; Rudolph, M.J.; Burshteyn, F.; Cassidy, M.S.; Gary, E.N.; Love, J.; Franklin, M.C.; Height, J.J. , Structures of human acetylcholinesterase in complex with pharmacologically important ligands. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 10282–10286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  301. Šali, A.; Blundell, T.L. , Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 234, 779–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  302. BIOVIA. https://www.3ds.com/products-services/biovia/ (02/2023),.
  303. Trott, O.; Olson, A.J. , AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, 2.0; Schrödinger, LLC: 2015.
  305. Pettersen, E.F.; Goddard, T.D.; Huang, C.C.; Couch, G.S.; Greenblatt, D.M.; Meng, E.C.; Ferrin, T.E. , UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Reina, M.; Guzmán-López, E.G.; Romeo, I.; Marino, T.; Russo, N.; Galano, A. , Computationally designed: P -coumaric acid analogs: Searching for neuroprotective antioxidants. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 14369–14380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Castro-González, L.M.; Alvarez-Idaboy, J.R.; Galano, A. , Computationally Designed Sesamol Derivatives Proposed as Potent Antioxidants. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 9566–9575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Reina, M.; Castañeda-Arriaga, R.; Pérez-González, A.; Guzmán-López, E.G.; Tan, D.X.; Reiter, R.; Galano, A. , A computer-assisted systematic search for melatonin derivatives with high potential as antioxidants. Melatonin Res. 2018, 1, 27–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Gleeson, M.P.; Hersey, A.; Montanari, D.; Overington, J. , Probing the links between in vitro potency, ADMET and physicochemical parameters. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2011, 10, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Zhong, H.; Mashinson, V.; Woolman, T.; Zha, M. , Understanding the molecular properties and metabolism of top prescribed drugs. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 1290–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Kiss, L.E.; Soares-Da-Silva, P. , Medicinal chemistry of catechol O -methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors and their therapeutic utility. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 8692–8717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Shafferman, A.; Kronman, C.; Flashner, Y.; Leitner, M.; Grosfeld, H.; Ordentlich, A.; Gozes, Y.; Cohen, S.; Ariel, N.; Barak, D.; Harel, M.; Silman, I.; Sussman, J.L.; Velan, B. , Mutagenesis of human acetylcholinesterase. Identification of residues involved in catalytic activity and in polypeptide folding. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 17640–17648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  313. Felder, C.E.; Botti, S.A.; Lifson, S.; Silman, I.; Sussman, J.L. , External and internal electrostatic potentials of cholinesterase models. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 1997, 15, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  314. Edmondson, D.E.; Mattevi, A.; Binda, C.; Li, M.; Hubálek, F. , Structure and mechanism of monoamine oxidase. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 1983–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Massey, V.; Ghisla, S.; Kieschke, K. , Studies on the reaction mechanism of lactate oxidase. Formation of two covalent flavin-substrate adducts on reaction with glycollate. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255, 2796–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  316. Korn, A.; Eichler, H.G.; Fischbach, R.; Gasic, S. , Moclobemide, a new reversible MAO inhibitor - interaction with tyramine and tricyclic antidepressants in healthy volunteers and depressive patients. Psychopharmacology 1986, 88, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  317. Fowler, J.S.; Logan, J.; Azzaro, A.J.; Fielding, R.M.; Zhu, W.; Poshusta, A.K.; Burch, D.; Brand, B.; Free, J.; Asgharnejad, M.; Wang, G.J.; Telang, F.; Hubbard, B.; Jayne, M.; King, P.; Carter, P.; Carter, S.; Xu, Y.; Shea, C.; Muench, L.; Alexoff, D.; Shumay, E.; Schueller, M.; Warner, D.; Apelskog-Torres, K. , Reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase-A (RIMAs): Robust, reversible inhibition of human brain MAO-A by CX157. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010, 35, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Ma, Z.; Liu, H.; Wu, B. , Structure-based drug design of catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors for CNS disorders. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2014, 77, 410–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Ferulic acid (FA) structure and site numbering used in this work.
Scheme 1. Ferulic acid (FA) structure and site numbering used in this work.
Preprints 72585 sch001
Figure 1. Selection score (SS) for the FA derivatives designed in this work. Vertical lines mark the arithmetic mean of the reference set (red) and the value for the parent molecule (FA, green).
Figure 1. Selection score (SS) for the FA derivatives designed in this work. Vertical lines mark the arithmetic mean of the reference set (red) and the value for the parent molecule (FA, green).
Preprints 72585 g001
Scheme 2. Structure and SS values of FA and the derivatives selected for the next stage of the investigation.
Scheme 2. Structure and SS values of FA and the derivatives selected for the next stage of the investigation.
Preprints 72585 sch002
Figure 2. Elimination score (SE) for the most promising FA derivatives, according to SS. Columns are divided to show the influence of the new contributions included in each score, with respect to the previous one.
Figure 2. Elimination score (SE) for the most promising FA derivatives, according to SS. Columns are divided to show the influence of the new contributions included in each score, with respect to the previous one.
Preprints 72585 g002
Figure 3. Individual contributions to the elimination score (SE), for the most promising FA derivatives.
Figure 3. Individual contributions to the elimination score (SE), for the most promising FA derivatives.
Preprints 72585 g003
Figure 4. The electron and hydrogen donating ability map for antioxidants (eH-DAMA), including the dominant acid-base species of FA derivatives, the parent molecule, Trolox, α-tocopherol, and the H2O2/O2•− oxidant pair.
Figure 4. The electron and hydrogen donating ability map for antioxidants (eH-DAMA), including the dominant acid-base species of FA derivatives, the parent molecule, Trolox, α-tocopherol, and the H2O2/O2•− oxidant pair.
Preprints 72585 g004
Figure 5. Polygenic scores of the ferulic acid and its derivatives.
Figure 5. Polygenic scores of the ferulic acid and its derivatives.
Preprints 72585 g005
Figure 6. Interactions in FA-26:AChE (left), FA-26:MAOB (middle) and FA-118:COMT complexes. FA-26 and FA-118 are shown using the ball and stick model. Interactions are presented as dotted lines: conventional hydrogen bonds (green), p-stacking (red), p-alkyl (magenta), and C-H non-conventional bond (cyan).
Figure 6. Interactions in FA-26:AChE (left), FA-26:MAOB (middle) and FA-118:COMT complexes. FA-26 and FA-118 are shown using the ball and stick model. Interactions are presented as dotted lines: conventional hydrogen bonds (green), p-stacking (red), p-alkyl (magenta), and C-H non-conventional bond (cyan).
Preprints 72585 g006
Table 1. Structural modifications and properties of some FA derivatives.
Table 1. Structural modifications and properties of some FA derivatives.
Functionalization Bioactivity Ref.
3-n-butylphthalide + glucose Anti-ischemic. [252]
Alkyl esters β-amyloid aggregation inhibition. [253]
Amide Antiviral [256]
Amide Antioxidant, inflammatory, mitophagy enhancing. [255]
Amide β-amyloid oligomerization and fibrillization inhibition. [232]
Amide Antioxidant, anticancer. [156]
Amide + pyrazole Antioxidant, and myocardial cell hypoxia reoxygenation. [262]
Amino acid Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant. [239]
Aniline Antimicrobial. [230]
Azetidine-2-one Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant. [225, 226]
Benzyl, and phenylethyl esters Anticancer. [158]
Benzylamino, and carbamyl β-amyloid aggregation inhibition, antioxidant, AChE inhibition. [234]
Cyclized Antiviral. [263]
Different rings Improvement of scopolamine-induced memory deficit in mice. [245]
Dimer Neuroprotection. [229]
Dimethylthiazol + diphenyltetrazolium bromide Anticancer. [258]
Ester Antibacterial. [242, 243]
Ester Antifungal. [260]
Ester Antithrombotic. [259]
Ester Anticancer. [236]
Ester Xanthine oxidase inhibition. [250]
Ester, and amide Anticancer. [247]
Ester and amide Antioxidant. [219]
Glycerol, and diglycerol β-amyloid aggregation inhibition. [231]
Heterocyclic Anticancer. [238]
Isopentyl Anticonvulsant. [264]
N-Hydroxy-N-Propargylamide Free radical scavenging, AChE inhibition, Cu(II) quelation. [221]
O-alkylamines Antioxidant, butyrylcholinesterase inhibition. [244]
OH + OMe group + amide Neuraminidase inhibition. [223]
Phthalate, and maleate Hepatoprotection. [220]
Piperazine Antiviral. [257]
Tributyltin(IV) Anticancer. [261]
Table 2. Estimated pKa values and molar fractions, Mf(q), at pH=7.4. The (q) in the acronym represents the charge of the acid base species.
Table 2. Estimated pKa values and molar fractions, Mf(q), at pH=7.4. The (q) in the acronym represents the charge of the acid base species.
pKa1 pKa2 pKa3 pKa4 Mf(+1) Mf(0) Mf(-1) Mf(-2) Mf(-3) Mf(-4)
FA 4.0 10.0 - - - 4×10-4 0.997 0.003 - -
FA-8 3.1 4.4 5.8 10.8 <10-4 0.023 0.976 4×10-4 - -
FA-12 3.7 5.6 10.3 11.3 - <10-4 0.015 0.984 0.001 <10-4
FA-26 2.5 3.9 10.1 11.8 <10-4 3×10-4 0.998 0.002 <10-4 -
FA-41 2.7 4.4 9.7 11.1 - <10-4 0.001 0.994 0.005 <10-4
FA-88 1.9 5.2 5.9 10.5 - <10-4 2×10-4 0.033 0.966 0.001
FA-106 3.7 5.7 10.3 11.2 - <10-4 0.019 0.980 0.001 <10-4
FA-115 3.8 5.8 8.6 10.9 - <10-4 0.023 0.918 0.059 <10-4
FA-118 3.6 8.5 9.5 13.0 - 1×10-4 0.921 0.078 0.001 <10-4
FA-138 4.0 7.6 9.9 - 2×10-4 0.596 0.403 0.001 - -
FA-142 3.1 5.8 10.4 12.2 - <10-4 0.022 0.977 0.001 <10-4
FA-173 3.6 4.2 10.0 - - <10-4 0.001 0.997 0.003 -
FA-175 3.8 9.6 11.0 - - 3×10-4 0.994 0.006 <10-4 -
Table 3. First ionization energy (IE, eV), electron affinities (EA, eV), and lowest bond dissociation energies (BDE, kcal/mol) for FA and the selected subset of derivatives.
Table 3. First ionization energy (IE, eV), electron affinities (EA, eV), and lowest bond dissociation energies (BDE, kcal/mol) for FA and the selected subset of derivatives.
IE EA BDE BDE-site*
q= 1
FA-138 11.64 3.54 89.30 b (OH)
q= 0
FA 8.36 -0.28 85.15 b (OH)
FA-8 8.75 -0.13 80.24 R5 (SH)
FA-26 8.35 0.34 83.06 R1 (OH)
FA-118 8.31 -0.95 80.18 b (OH)
FA-138 8.58 0.29 83.97 b (OH)
FA-175 8.12 -0.23 80.09 R2 (OH)
q= -1
FA 4.85 -2.95 82.48 b (OH)
FA-8 3.75 -2.95 77.44 R5 (SH)
FA-26 4.33 -3.12 77.29 R1 (OH)
FA-118 4.43 -2.98 78.79 b (OH)
FA-138 3.89 -3.11 74.88 b (OH)
FA-175 4.66 -3.05 78.54 b (OH)
q= -2
FA -0.06 -6.00 96.96 a (OCH3)
FA-8 0.20 -5.58 82.04 b (OH)
FA-26 -0.34 -6.04 71.30 b (OH)
FA-118 -1.09 -4.97 74.87 b (OH)
FA-138 -0.55 -5.77 97.02 a (OCH3)
FA-175 -0.31 -5.32 75.90 b (OH)
q= -3
FA-118 -3.78 -7.59 71.01 b (OH)
*The labels correspond to those shown in Scheme 1.
Table 4. Polygenic score (SP) values for ferulic acid and its derivatives.
Table 4. Polygenic score (SP) values for ferulic acid and its derivatives.
Compound DGBW (kcal/mol) SP
COMT MAO-B AChE
Ferulic Acid -5.28 -7.19 -7.37 3.78
FA-9 -5.14 -6.91 -6.43 3.50
FA-26 -5.09 -7.63 -7.88 3.93
FA-118 -5.90 -7.09 -6.95 3.79
FA-138 -5.12 -7.17 -7.40 3.76
FA-175 -5.42 -7.02 -7.01 3.70
DGB, dopa= -5.44 kcal/mol in COMT; DGB, pea= -6.01 kcal/mol in MAO-B; DGB, ACh= 4.56 kcal/mol in AChE. For natural substrates SP=3.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated