Preprint
Article

Climate Change Impacts on Frost and Thaw Considerations: Case Study of Airport Pavement Design in Canada

Altmetrics

Downloads

134

Views

37

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

05 May 2023

Posted:

05 May 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Rising temperatures due to the climate change can significantly impact the frost/thaw condition of airport pavements in cold regions. This case study investigates the implications of the the warming temperatures on frost/thaw penetration and frost-heave of pavements for critical airports across Canada. To this end, different methods were used in the quantification process through climate change simulations considering the emission scenario RCP8.5 in a 20- and 40-year time horizon. The results show that climate change would have different design implications for airport pavements depending on their location. The predictions suggest a shallower frost penetration depth and possibly less frost-heave for the airports not underlain by permafrost, while airports over permafrost areas might experience an increase in thickness of the active layer ranging from 41 to 57 percent by 2061. Among the different methods used in this study, it was observed that some methods performed the best in predicting frost depth of fine soils, while others worked better with the frost depth prediction of coarse soils. The results indicate the need for more mechanistic models to provide a more realistic prediction of frost/thaw penetration as compared to the existing empirical models.
Keywords: 
Subject: Engineering  -   Civil Engineering

1. Introduction

Canada’s Changing Climate Report published in 2019 presents several crucial facts that can affect the life cycle of airport and road pavements. According to the report, the annual average temperature in Canada has increased by 1.7 °C between 1948 to 2019, however, the most drastic change can be noticed over the winter seasons, found to be warmer by 3.3 °C [1]. Further to the average temperature changes, an increase in temperature can lead to changes in the timing and duration of winter freezing and spring thawing in cold regions, directly impacting the frost and thaw penetration depths [2].
Sias et al. used an ensemble of climate models to forecast how climate change might affect freezing and thawing processes beneath roadways in Minnesota in the United States [3]. The results of the study showed that the duration for which the pavement cross section remains frozen will be significantly shortened over the next 30 years, and that shallower frost depths are projected for the end of the century. Figure 1 shows the predicted frost depth in different sites in Minnesota, demonstrating that projected frost depths under emission scenario RCP 8.5 can become shallower at a greater rate than the emission scenario RCP 4.5 after 2040. The results also suggested larger changes over time and larger differences between the low- and high-emission scenarios at the end of the century for the sites with deeper frost penetration.
Similarly, Canadian pavement conditions will also get impacted by the warming climate. With shorter freezing season lengths in Canada, not only frost penetration depth decreases but also does the minimum pavement thickness requirements to cope with frost penetration. While the latter may possibly lower the initial cost of construction, areas underlain by permafrost may suffer from pavement bearing capacity reduction due to melting of the frozen layers.
Permafrost temperature in Canada has increased over the past three to four decades. Regional observations have shown warming rates of about 0.1 °C per decade in the central Mackenzie Valley and 0.3 °C to 0.5 °C per decade in the high Arctic. Such increments might seem modest; however, permafrost layers can be highly vulnerable to thawing since the soil temperature in these regions are already close to zero [1]. Melting of the permafrost soil will increase the seasonal active layer thickness, that is, the upper part of the ground that freezes and thaws each year. For instance, the seasonal active layer thickness in the Mackenzie Valley has increased by approximately 10% since 2000 [1], making these areas more prone to deformations and distresses caused by freeze-thaw cycling.
Knowing how climate change can impact airport pavements frost/thaw condition is essential for better planning the future transportation infrastructure projects in Canada. However, available studies are scarce, if any, in the existing literature to inform decision making in this area. To this end, the aim of this study is to analyze how climate change can affect frost/thaw penetration and frost heave in several locations across Canada. First, frost depth calculations from three methods were compared to the field data with the goal of evaluating the accuracy of the methodologies. Then, frost/thaw depths and frost heave predictions for the high emission scenario RCP8.5 in a 20- and 40-year time horizon were made.

2. Background

2.1. Frost penetration and heave

There are several methods to calculate frost penetration depth, where almost all these methods are related to the freezing index (FI), which is a measure of the severity of freezing condition during the winter season. FI is calculated as the summation of daily average air temperatures over the freezing period [4]. Figure 2 shows an example of the calculation of the FI over the winter of 1996/1997 in Beatrice, ON.
According to the Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) manual of pavement structural design ASG-19, the frost protection depth should be calculated using a minimum 10-year average freezing index [4]. Site air freezing index measures should be available from airfield data records, based on meteorological observations. If not available, Transport Canada allows an estimation to be made from a map of freezing indexes provided at the ASG-19 manual.
Limiting the depth of frost action into the subgrade soils can limit the potential for frost heave and thaw weakening. This is achieved by defining a minimum pavement thickness and by excavating the soil susceptible to frost penetration preferably to the full depth. However, when the latter approach is not possible, ASG-19 advises that at least 1 m should be excavated [4]. To identify whether a soil is frost susceptible or not, TCCA relies on the soil gradation, where the subgrade soil is non-frost-susceptible if it has less than 10 percent passing the 0.075 mm sieve. TCCA uses an empirical equation to calculate frost penetration depth. The method is based on the results published by Argue & Denyes [5], which has evaluated 39 sites and 93 observations to predict frost depth in asphalt surfaced pavements. The calculation of the frost penetration depth in asphalt surfaced pavements according to the Pavement Structural Design Manual ATR-021 proposed by TCCA is presented in Equation (1) [6].
T m i n = 61 + 6.8 F
where, T m i n is the minimum thickness of the pavement structure (cm) and F is the average annual air freezing index ( ° C d a y s ).
Another available method to classify the soil frost susceptibility is the Chamberlain Method, used by the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO) [7]. This method defines the soil according to the material proportions of sand, silt, and clay as, acceptable, borderline or unacceptable material. To calculate the frost penetration depth, the MTO uses the empirical curve presented in Equation (2).
P = 32.8 + 5.78 F
where, P is the frost penetration depth (cm) and F is the freezing index ( ° C d a y s ) .
On the other hand, Ministère des Transports du Québec’s (MTQ) proposes a mechanistic approach to predict frost depth and frost heave as a function of climate, subgrade soil properties and pavement thickness. This analysis method requires more detailed site investigation than other methods, but it has shown through validation procedures to yield good results in predicting frost penetration depth [8].
MTQ approach is based on the SSR model developed in Finland [9], in which the calculation of the frost depth is based on the heat balance at the frost front. The method accounts for the segregation potential, which is a measure of the susceptibility of a soil to frost action, that could be measured in the laboratory or estimated through empirical equations. Material properties variables such as dry density, particle mineralogy, water content and specific surface area are some of the inputs, providing the basis for calculation of thermal conductivities, latent heat, and other important material-dependent parameters. This model is utilized in i3C-me, a mechanistic software for pavement design and performance prediction, where a specific module is available to predict frost penetration and frost heave as a function of climate, subgrade soil properties and pavement design [8,10].
In order to calculate frost depth and frost heave, the air-surface transfer coefficient (n-factor) also needs to be defined. The n-factor is defined as the ratio between the surface temperature in freezing conditions and the air temperature in freezing conditions. This value depends on the atmospheric conditions (hours of sunshine, cloud cover, wind, humidity, pollution, etc.), the absorption capacity of the surface layer (e.g., albedo, colour, texture, sun exposure, inclination, orientation, etc.) and the thermal regime below the surface. Andersland and Ladanyi proposed typical values for the n-factor according to the surface conditions. The authors suggested that for asphalt pavements n-value most probably ranges from 0.9 to 0.95, while for concrete pavements this range would be between 0.7 to 0.9 [11].
Lastly, when predicting the frost penetration through the MTQ methodology, the rigorous frost index (FIr) needs to be defined. FIr represents an incremented frost index that accounts for colder than average winters. The i3c-me software offers two options for determining this value. The first option uses an estimate that represents a winter that would correspond to the average of the three coldest winters over a 30-year period, according to Equation (3). The second option follows a probabilistic approach that considers the history of winters for a given period over which the standard deviation and average of the freezing index distribution need to be calculated.
F I r = 1.143 F I n + 220
where, F I r is the rigorous freezing index ( ° C d a y s ) and F I n is the normal freezing index ( ° C d a y s ) or just freezing index, as previously defined.
In the first analysis presented in the current study, MTQ prediction was compared with field data from a specific year, where the rigorous freezing index was considered to be the same as the normal freezing index. In the second analysis, in which MTQ prediction model was used to evaluate the climate change scenarios, the rigorous freezing index was used, and its value was determined through Equation (3).

2.2. Permafrost Thawing

While southern areas of Canada may benefit from the shortening of the winter season, northern provinces will likely suffer with increased differential thaw settlement, frost heave, and a decrease in the overall pavement strength due to permafrost thawing and higher number of freeze-thaw cycles. Figure 3 shows a Canadian map that provides the classification of permafrost based on the proportion of land that is underlain by frozen layers within a given area. The southern areas in Canada are not underlain by permafrost, while northern areas are underlain by discontinuous or continuous permafrost layers.
The thawing of previously permanent frozen layers can cause serious damage to pavement structures due to settlement. Soil strength from ice bonding will be reduced as the ground water thaws, and this will lead to ground instability and higher incidence of slope failure in pavements [12]. The effects of a rise in number of freeze-thaw cycles, on the other hand, include accelerated degradation of asphalt concrete materials [13], decrease in asphalt concrete structural capacity such as Marshall Stability [14] and decrease in tensile strength ratio of the asphalt mixture as a result of moisture-induced damages [15].
TCCA affirms that an optimum approach for designing pavements over permafrost areas is to provide a pavement and embankment thickness such that thawing does not reach the existing in-situ subgrade material. Whenever this alternative becomes uneconomical, the airport pavement design should be based on the bearing strength of the thawed subgrade soil. Therefore, thaw depth plays an important role in design and performance of pavements located over permafrost areas. A study published by Argue and Denyes recorded observations of thaw penetration depth in gravel runways in Canada [5]. Based on the observations, a relationship between the depth of thaw and the thawing index in gravel runways was stablished according to Equation (4) [6].
X = 81.3 + 9.5 I
where, X is the depth of thaw penetration (cm) and I is the thawing index (°C-days), calculated as the summation of daily average air temperatures over the thawing period [4]. This equation was used in the current study to predict the thaw penetration depths in several airports over the northern regions of Canada.
Figure 3. Permafrost zones of the Canadian permafrost region [12].
Figure 3. Permafrost zones of the Canadian permafrost region [12].
Preprints 72759 g003

3. Methodology

Two main analyses are performed in this research. First, the frost/thaw depths were predicted by applying MTO, MTQ, and TCCA methods and the results are compared with the actual recorded frost depths measured from the field. In the next step, the analysis is used to evaluate the implications of these climate change projections in terms of frost penetration, frost heave, and thaw depth for several Airports in Canada as well as the USA. The field data was obtained mainly from the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) database and includes nine cities located in Canada and the United States. Among the evaluated cases under the first analysis, only one case (i.e., St. Célestin, QC) was not obtained from the LTPP database, rather through the published data from Boutonnet & St-Laurent, 2003 [16]. The field data was then compared to the frost penetration depths calculated according to each site’s freezing index, in the case of the MTO and TCCA, and soil characteristics, in the case of the MTQ.
In the second analysis, a total of ten Canadian airports were evaluated. The selected locations represent different climate scenarios within the country and compare how differently climate change can impact frost/thaw penetration depth in those cities. Table 1 shows the locations evaluated in each analysis.

4. Results

4.1. Analysis I: Comparison of Different Methods

The field data includes four cities located in Canada and five cities located in the USA. Table 2 shows the field data, including the section ID according to the LTPP database, the year in which the frost depth data was collected, the closest city to the data collection point and the maximum frost penetration depth recorded in the referred year. The last two columns of the table include the Annual Mean Temperature (AMT, °C) and the Air Freezing Index (FI, °C∗days), for which the raw data was obtained through Environment Canada [17] for the cases in Canada and the National Solar Radiation Database (NSRDB) [18] for the cases in the USA. The AMT values were calculated considering the annual mean temperature from the two years referenced in column 2 of Table 2.
All locations shown in Table 2 are asphalt concrete surfaced pavements, and the n-factor was assumed to be 0.9 for all pavements. The frost penetration varies from 71 to 178 cm, Hamlin having the smallest whereas Winnipeg had the highest frost penetration depth. Hamlin also showed the smallest Freezing Index among all the cities, while the highest FI was attributed to Viscount. Table 3 presents the pavement structures for each site, subgrade soil description, and soil classification according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS).
The complete dataset used for frost depth calculation for St. Célestin site can be found at Boutonnet & St-Laurent, 2003 [16], and hence is not repeated in the current paper. Figure 4 compares the frost depths obtained from field data with those predicted using the MTO, MTQ and TCCA methods. The subgrade soil classification is indicated under each city’s name in this bar chart. The difference between the predicted frost depths from each method and those measured from the field data is shown on top of the each bar in percentage, indicating the accuracy of these models to predict the frost depth for different regions and soil types.
Looking at the fine-grained soils, the results indicate that MTO’s method overestimates the frost depth penetration by 18% for the fat clay (CH) soil type, while it results in about 6% and 10% underestimation in the Sandy Silt (ML) and Silty Clay (CL) cases, respectively. The method also underestimates frost depth by 17% in the case of the poorly graded gravel (GM) and overestimates by 28%, 12%, and 37% in the cases of Silty Sands (SP and SM) in different regions. For the poorly graded sand soil type, MTO’s method overestimated frost depth prediction by 24% in the Great Falls site but could almost perfectly predict the value for the case of Bemidji in Minnesota.
Comparing the results obtained from the TCCA and MTO methods, it can be concluded that regardless of the soil type, the two methods consistently provide either an overestimation or underestimation of the frost penetration depth, which can be considered relatively similar to each other. More specifically, TCAA method overestimated the frost depth penetration by 27% for the CL soil, underestimated it by 4% and 12% in the ML and CL. In the case of the poorly graded sands available in Bemidji and Great Falls sites, TCCA overestimated frost depth by 5% and 17%, respectively, while for the poorly graded gravel in New Haven site it underestimated this value by 15%. Furthermore, the TCCA results exhibited overestimation in predicting the frost depth in the range 19% to 48% in the cases of the Silty Sands in Hamlin and Virden. Although both underestimation and overestimation of the frost penetration depths can affect the pavement design to some extent, an underestimation can be especially critical in the case of frost susceptible soil types that are prone to the frost action and can lead to premature pavement failures.
Finally, MTQ method showed either close to field data or more conservative protection depths in most cases. The only case among those evaluated where the method underestimated frost depth is the GM soil from New Haven, Vermont (-7%). The MTQ method showed the best results within clays, silt, and gravel, with a difference of 3%, -1%, and -3% in cases of the fat clay, sandy silt, and silty clay soil types, which can all be considered relatively very close to the actual measured depths in the field. In terms of the difference in magnitude between the predicted and measured field frost depths, the worst case scenarios were regarding the sites with silty sands and poorly graded sands, with values being overestimated in the range of 15% to 44% higher than the field measured data. While this is still on the safe side for the purpose of frost protection, such overestimation can lead to overdesigned sections and consequently resulting in unnecessary increase in the pavement construction costs. Nevertheless, the results indicate that MTQ method provides better estimation of the required frost protection for the case studies investigated in this research.
Table 4 provides a general comparison between the accuracy of the predictions from the three methods investigated in this research, along with their maximum and minimum differences when compared with the data measured from the field, as well as the average difference and the standard deviation, considering all values as positive.
From Table 4 it is evident that all the methods provided more accurate results when predicting frost depth of the fine soils. Under the fine soil scenario, the MTQ had the smallest average difference (2%), and a small standard deviation (1%). On the other hand, for the coarse-grained soil scenario, MTO method led to the smallest average difference among the methods (20%); however, the TCCA method was not far behind (21%). Regardless of the magnitude differences, the MTQ method provided the most prudent results in terms of rarely underpredicting the frost depth for all the evaluated scenarios.

4.2. Climate Change Scenarios (Analysis II)

In order to consider the implications of climate change scenarios for airport runway pavement design analysis II focused on 20-yr and 40-yr time horizons. To this end, the required parameters included the average annual air temperature (aka Annual Mean Temperature or AMT), the air Freezing Index (FI) and Thawing Index (TI), soil geotechnical inputs, soil thermal conductivity inputs and the air-surface transfer coefficient. These parameters were gathered for the sites of interest as summarized by Table 5 and Table 6.
The historical values for the annual mean temperature and the air freezing/thawing indexes were calculated from data available at the Government of Canada website, considering the years from 2012 to 2021 (10-year average) [17]. The climate predictions for the year of 2041 and 2061 were obtained through the Climate Atlas of Canada website [19]. The primary source of Climate Atlas of Canada models is the Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium (PCIC), which has projections of daily temperature data from an ensemble of 24 climate models using two carbon emission scenarios, a “Low Carbon” (i.e., RCP 4.5) and a “High Carbon” (i.e., RCP 8.5) future scenario. This research considered the ensemble mean of emission scenario RCP 8.5, to perform the climate change simulations.
There is a large amount of uncertainty in climate model projections because the future concentration of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere are not fully known or predictable in a deterministic manner. For this reason, Canada’s Changing Climate Report requires that no likelihoods should be ascribed to the RCP scenarios, as they are all deemed plausible [1]. The historical and predicted temperature records and freezing indices are presented in Table 5.
It is noticeable that the northern cities such as Yellowknife, Iqaluit (YFB), Baker Lake (YBK) and Cambridge Bay have higher predicted temperature changes, Cambridge Bay presenting the worst-case scenario with a temperature increase of 5 °C in 2061. To evaluate frost penetration using MTQ methodology, the soil classification and properties need to be known. Therefore, two soils were chosen: a Clay (CL) and a Clayey Silt (ML, ML-CL) soil to represent the dominant soil types in those regions. Table 6 presents the parameters defined for the Clay and Clayey Silt soils.
Table 5. Average annual air temperature and air freezing index.
Table 5. Average annual air temperature and air freezing index.
Airport AMTΨ AMT 2041 AMT 2061 FI/*TI FI/*TI 2041 FI/*TI 2061 Temp. Change 2041 Temp. Change 2061
Toronto (YYZ) 9 11 12 426 252 166 2 3
Montreal (YUL) 8 9 10 758 551 420 1 2
Quebec (YQB) 5 6 8 1144 818 642 1 3
Calgary (YYC) 5 6 7 857 754 675 1 2
Regina (YQR) 3 5 6 1560 1231 1105 2 3
Winnipeg (YWG) 3 5 7 1674 1317 1133 2 4
Yellowknife (YZF) -4 -1 0 1860* 2099* 3273* 3 4
Iqaluit (YFB) -8 -6 -4 666* 1015* 1355* 2 4
Baker Lake (YBK) -10 -7 -6 986* 1474* 1639* 3 4
Cambridge Bay (YCB) -13 -10 -8 683* 1035* 1310* 3 5
Ψ AMT—Annual Mean Temperature (°C), FI—Freezing Index (°C∗days)
*TI—Thawing Index (°C-days), Temp. Change—Temperature Change (°C)
Table 6. Geotechnical and thermal conductivity parameters assumed in the simulations in this study [20].
Table 6. Geotechnical and thermal conductivity parameters assumed in the simulations in this study [20].
Soil Geotechnical parameters Thermal conductivity parameters
ρS (kg/m3) ρd (kg/m3) w (%) SS (m2/g) kS (W/m·°C) χ (W/m·°C) η k u k f a (MPa−1) SP0 (mm2/°K·H)
CL 2750 1300 34 60 2.9 1.7 1.8 1.9 0.9 7.0 5.0
ML 2700 1450 30 40 2.9 1.7 1.8 1.9 0.9 7.0 8.0
where, ρ S = density of soil solids (kg/m3), ρ d = dry density (kg/m3), w = water content (%), and S S = specific surface area of fine particles (m2/g), k S = thermal conductivity of soil solid particles (W/m· ° C ), χ = material parameter that considers the effect of the particle shape (W/m· ° C ), η = material parameter that considers the effect of the particle shape (no unit), k u = granularity factor for unfrozen thermal conductivity, k f = granularity factor for frozen thermal conductivity, a = overload coefficient (MPa−1), and SP0 = segregation potential without vertical load (mm2/°K·H). The geotechnical and thermal conductivity parameters are used to calculate the degree of saturation (Sr), latent heat of fusion (Lf), unfrozen and frozen thermal conductivity (ku and kf).

4.2.1. TCCA and MTO methods

TCCA manual requires the frost penetration of asphalt surfaced pavements to be calculated using Equation (1), while the penetration of thaw in permafrost areas should be calculated using Equation (4). A summary of the results of frost depth and thaw penetration predictions using the TCCA model for different Canadian regions in this study can be seen in Figure 5 and Figure 6 for the areas not underlain by permafrost and underlain by permafrost, respectively.
It can be realized that the historical frost penetration depths range from 79 cm to 217 cm, with Toronto having the smallest and Winnipeg exhibiting the deepest frost penetration. In addition to the depth of frost penetration, it is important to evaluate the potential changes in the future frost depth penetration over these regions. Therefore, the results from Analysis I indicate that the maximum percentage of expected variation in the climate change scenarios would happen in Toronto (i.e., -41% and -66%) while it is predicted that Calgary would experience the least level of changes (i.e., -9% and -16%) over the time horizons of 2041 and 2061, respectively.
Furthermore, the results of historical thaw penetration for the analysed cities were found to range from 164 cm to 328 cm, with Iqaluit having the smallest and Yellowknife experiencing the deepest thaw penetration. Therefore, the results of the climate change scenarios indicate that all the investigated cities would undergo an increase in thawing penetration, where Iqaluit is predicted to get affected the most with 35% and 64% increase in the thawing depth at the time horizons 2041 and 2061, respectively. For the areas underlain by permafrost, such increase translates to a thicker active layer which can strongly affect the load bearing capacity of the infrastructure (to be) built in those areas.
Figure 5. Frost Penetration - TCCA.
Figure 5. Frost Penetration - TCCA.
Preprints 72759 g005
Figure 6. Thaw Penetration Depth - TCCA.
Figure 6. Thaw Penetration Depth - TCCA.
Preprints 72759 g006
It is important to note that among the airports underlain by permafrost, Cambridge Bay and Baker Lake Airports are constituted of gravel runways, while Iqaluit and Yellowknife airports have asphalt surfaced runways. The TCCA equation for thawing depth was derived from experiments in gravel runways. While TCCA does not specify the application of its model to a certain type of pavement, the analysis of Iqaluit and Yellowknife can be affected by generalization of a method applicability that was developed based on the gravel surface data.
On the other hand, MTO’s methodology can also be used to predict the frost and thaw penetration depths in the regions investigated in this study. In terms of frost penetration, the results are presented in Figure 7 using the MTO methodology, where it can be recognized that the historical frost penetration for the analysed cities range from 87 cm to 204 cm, with Toronto having the smallest and Winnipeg the highest frost penetration depth. This is similar to the predictions obtained through the TCCA method. Figure 7 indicates that Calgary exhibited the smallest decrease in frost penetration depth under both climate change scenarios with a projected reduction of 8 and 14%, while Toronto had the largest projected frost penetration reduction (i.e., a reduction of 32% and 52% at 2041 and 2061, respectively).

4.2.2. MTQ Method

Further to the two empirical methods discussed so far, the more mechanistic based method utilized by MTQ was used to evaluate the climate change scenarios at the two time horizons of 2041 and 2061 for different soil types and locations. The results of the frost penetration depth and frost heave for the Clayey soil were calculated using the i3Cme tool and are presented in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively.
Figure 8 shows that the historical frost penetration depth calculated through MTQ method ranges from 92 cm to 181 cm. The rankings of the regions with the smallest (i.e., Toronto) and deepest (i.e., Winnipeg) frost penetration remains consistent with the MTO and TCCA methods when analysing the results using MTQ, while the magnitude of the predicted frost penetration depths varies from a method to another. Similarly, Calgary was found to have the smallest percentage of decrease in frost penetration depth in both climate change scenarios (-6% and -12%), while Toronto had the greatest (-19% and -29%). On the other hand, in terms of frost heave predictions, the historical values calculated for the selected locations in this study range from 17 to 26 cm as shown in Figure 9. Similar to frost penetration depth calculations, Toronto showed the smallest and Winnipeg showed the highest frost heave values. Furthermore, the climate change scenarios suggest that Calgary may experience the smallest percent decrease in frost heave (-4% and -7%) while Toronto may undergo the highest rate of changes (-12% and -20%). The results of frost penetration depth and frost heave for the Clayey Silt (ML, ML-CL) soils are presented in Figure 10 and Figure 11, respectively.
Again, Calgary had the smallest percent decrease in frost penetration depth in both climate change scenarios (-4% and -7%), while Toronto had the greatest (-13% and -21%). Figure 11 shows that the frost heave that was calculated based on historical data ranges from 28 to 44 cm. The climate change scenarios show that the pavement design implications are not consistently negative throughout all the regions. To this end, while there might be slight differences for Calgary which had the smallest percentage of decrease in frost heave (-4% and -7%), the change may alleviate some frost heave related issues in case of Toronto with the largest reduction in the heave values (i.e., -13% and -21%). Nevertheless, this observation is focused only on low temperature extreme of the pavements performance while climate change scenarios may have pronounced adverse impacts with respect to the high temperature behaviour, that needs to be further studies and is out of the scope of the current research. Figure 12 compares the frost heave calculations for the Clay and a Clayey Silt soil in the historical scenario.
When comparing frost heave from the clay to the clayey silt soil it is possible to note a great difference. The frost heave calculated for the clayey silt was in average 69% higher than what was calculated for the CL soil. This can be attributed to the fact that silty soils are considerably more susceptible to frost heave than clays, in general.

5. Discussion

It can be recognized from comparing the different frost depth calculation methods in this study that all of them yield better accuracy when predicting frost depth of fine soil types such as clays and silts. Under the fine soil scenario, the MTQ method matched the field data the best; however, it resulted in a considerable overestimation of the frost penetration for the case of the coarse soil scenarios. This can be attributed to the fact that the method’s accuracy strongly depends on the material properties as the model inputs. The segregation potential of the subgrade is crucial for determining the frost penetration depth, and the results can be highly biased if incorrect values are used. The authors of this research believe that availability of laboratory data regarding the materials could have improved the accuracy of the results for the coarse materials.
Both the MTO and TCCA methods are primarily empirical approaches. Comparing the two methods, MTO performed better than the TCCA model. The results from MTO analysis also had better accuracy when predicting frost depth of fine soils. As previously explained, the equation used by MTO to estimate frost penetration depth is based on an empirical method and was established through observations made for several highways across Ontario. Consequently, this model is more representative of the frost penetration through the soils that are present in the region [21]. Nevertheless, due to the empirical nature of both MTO and TCCA models, the method’s applicability to various soil types may be limited since they do not account for the specific soil properties. However, both are still very practical approaches to estimate the frost penetration when no information is available about the soil properties.
The climate change predictions for the next 40 years, considering emission scenario RCP8.5, show an increase of up to 5 °C in the annual mean temperature and a noticeable decrease in the freezing index for the cities evaluated in this research. The results from all the methods indicate that there will be a decrease in frost penetration depth due to climate change that ranges from 12% up to 66%. Frost heave will most likely decrease in all areas not underlain by permafrost, with decline rates that range from 7% to 30%. On the other hand, the thaw penetration projection results show that the cities underlain by permafrost will suffer from an increase in the seasonal active layers depth, since thawing depth will likely increase within a range of 41% to 57% in 2061. It should be emphasized that although such increments might seem modest, soil temperatures in permafrost layers are already close to zero and hence can be highly vulnerable to thawing. In other words, it is important to note that temperature fluctuations around 0 °C—as typical freezing temperature for water—could increase the frequency of freeze/thaw cycles and potentially pose further issues with respect to bound pavement materials durability as well.

6. Conclusions

The implications of the shortening of winter seasons for frost and thaw penetration depths and frost heave in Canadian Airports is presented in this research. Three commonly used methodologies proposed by the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO), the Ministère des Transports du Québec’s (MTQ) and Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) were evaluated. The following conclusions can be drawn based on the results of this case study:
From comparing the frost penetration predictions with the actual field measurements, it can be concluded that both the empirical (i.e., MTO and TCCA) and mechanistic (i.e., MTQ) models performed considerably better in case of finer grained soil types, rather than coarse subgrade soils. MTQ model resulted in the highest accuracy that can attributed to its mechanistic-based approach that accounts for materials properties.
The climate change simulation using RCP8.5 for horizon times 2041 and 2061 shows that the warming climate impacts on areas underlain by permafrost should be considered differently than those not-underlain by permafrost since changes to the active layer thickness becomes the main concern due to the projected thaw penetration in the former case.
Both MTO and TCCA methods provide consistent trends of frost penetration prediction for the airport sites investigated in this study when compared with the measured field data. However, due to the climate change impacts and the empirical nature of these methods, moving towards more mechanistic approaches that can account for actual soil properties would be a necessity to avoid overdesigning pavements in non-permafrost areas or under-designing in case of the airports underlain by permafrost.
It is suggested that future research on this matter broaden the number of sites evaluated to include more divers soil types and climate regimes outside North America and simulate more climate change scenarios. The results of this study also indicate the need for including more specific soil properties and ideally utilizing measured values to enhance the reliability of climate change impacts projection through the use of mechanistic models.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.B., P.T. and S.T.; methodology, P.B. and P.T; software, P.B.; validation, P.T. and P.B.; formal analysis, P.B.; investigation, P.B. and P.T.; data curation, P.B. and P.T.; writing—original draft preparation, P.B.; writing—review and editing, P.B., P.T., and S.T.; visualization, P.B. and P.T.; supervision, P.T and S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Environmnet and Climate Change Canada. Canada’s Changing Climate Report. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Daniel, J.S.; Jacobs, J.M.; Miller, H.; Stoner, A.; Crowley, J.; Khalkhali, M.; Thomas, A. Climate change: potential impacts on frost–thaw conditions and seasonal load restriction timing for low-volume roadways. Road Materials and Pavement Design 2018, 1126–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jo Sias, D.; Jacobs, J.M.; Miller, H.; Stoner, A.; Crowley, J.; Khalkhali, M.; Thomas, A. Climate change: potential impacts on frost–thaw conditions and seasonal load restriction timing for low-volume roadways. Road Materials and Pavement Design 2018, 1126–1146. [Google Scholar]
  4. TCCA. Manual of Pavement Structural Design ASG-19. Transport Canada Civil Aviation, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  5. Argue, G.H.; Denyes, B.B. Estimating the depth of pavement frost and thaw penetrations. Transportation Research Record, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  6. TCCA. Pavement Structural Design Training Manual, ATR-021, AK-77-68-300. Public Works & Government Services Canada, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chamberlain, E.J. Frost susceptibility of soil, review of index tests. Cold Regions Research and Engineering Lab Hanover NH, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  8. St-Laurent, D. Routine mechanistic pavement design against frost heave. Cold Regions Engineering 2012: Sustainable Infrastructure Development in a Changing Cold Environment. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. Saarelainen, S. Modelling frost heaving and frost penetration in soils at some observation sites in Finland: the SSR model. 1992. [Google Scholar]
  10. Grellet, D.; Richard, C.; Pérez-González, E.L. Mechanistic-Empirical Flexible Pavement Design software: i3c-me. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Andersland, O.B.; Ladanyi, B. Frozen ground engineering. John Wiley & Sons, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith, S.L.; Burgess, M.M. Sensitivity of permafrost to climate warming in Canada. [Online]. 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abreu, E.A. Impacts of Climate Change on Canadian Airport Pavements. University of Waterloo, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Özgan, E.; Serin, S. Investigation of certain engineering characteristics of asphalt concrete exposed to freeze–thaw cycles. Cold Regions Science and Technology 2013, 85, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Feng, D.; et al. Impact of salt and freeze–thaw cycles on performance of asphalt mixtures in coastal frozen region of China. Cold Regions Science and Technology 2010, 62, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Boutonnet, M.; Savard, Y.; Lerat, P.; St-Laurent, D.; Pouliot, N. Thermal aspect of frost-thaw pavement dimensioning: in situ measurement and numerical modeling. Transportation Research Record 2003, 1821, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Government of Canada. Historical Climate Data. 25 November 2021. [Online]. Available online: https://climate.weather.gc.ca/ (accessed on 4 February 2022).
  18. National Solar Radiation Database (NSRDB). NSRDB Data Viewer. [Online]. Available online: https://nsrdb.nrel.gov/ (accessed on 16 February 2022).
  19. Prairie Climate Centre. Climate Atlas of Canada. [Online]. Available online: https://climateatlas.ca/ (accessed on 4 November 2021).
  20. Doré, G.; Grellet, D.; Richard, C.; Bilodeau, J.P.; Pérez-González, E.L.; Barón, H.M.F. Mechanistic-Empirical Flexible Pavement Design software: i3c-me User`s Manual. Québec City, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ministry of Transportation of Ontario. Pavement Design and Rehabilitation Manual. Materials Engineering and Research Office, 2013. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The projected maximum frost depths using actual pavement cross-sections. Adapted from [3].
Figure 1. The projected maximum frost depths using actual pavement cross-sections. Adapted from [3].
Preprints 72759 g001
Figure 2. Determination of the freezing index for Beatrice, Ontario, over the winter of 1996/1997.
Figure 2. Determination of the freezing index for Beatrice, Ontario, over the winter of 1996/1997.
Preprints 72759 g002
Figure 4. Comparison between frost depth field data and prediction methods.
Figure 4. Comparison between frost depth field data and prediction methods.
Preprints 72759 g004
Figure 7. Frost Penetration Depth - MTO.
Figure 7. Frost Penetration Depth - MTO.
Preprints 72759 g007
Figure 8. Frost Penetration Depth – MTQ, Clay.
Figure 8. Frost Penetration Depth – MTQ, Clay.
Preprints 72759 g008
Figure 9. Frost Heave – MTQ, Clay.
Figure 9. Frost Heave – MTQ, Clay.
Preprints 72759 g009
Figure 10. Frost Penetration Depth for Clayey Silt - MTQ.
Figure 10. Frost Penetration Depth for Clayey Silt - MTQ.
Preprints 72759 g010
Figure 11. Frost Heave - MTQ, Clayey Silt.
Figure 11. Frost Heave - MTQ, Clayey Silt.
Preprints 72759 g011
Figure 12. Frost heave predictions for a Clay and a Clayey Silt soil.
Figure 12. Frost heave predictions for a Clay and a Clayey Silt soil.
Preprints 72759 g012
Table 1. Locations Evaluated in Analysis I and II.
Table 1. Locations Evaluated in Analysis I and II.
Analysis I Analysis II
Canada:
  • Winnipeg, MB
  • Viscount, SK
  • Beatrice, ON
  • St. Célestin, QC
Not underlain by permafrost
  • Toronto Airport (YYZ)
  • Montréal International Airport (YUL)
  • Québec City International Airport (YQB)
  • Calgary International Airport (YYC)
  • Regina International Airport (YQR)
  • Winnipeg International Airport (YWG)
USA
  • New Haven, VT
  • Bemidji, MN
  • Great Falls, MT
  • Hamlin, NY
  • Virden, MB
Underlain by Permafrost
  • Yellowknife Airport (YZF)
  • Iqaluit International Airport (YFB)
  • Baker Lake Airport (YBK)
  • Cambridge Bay Airport (YCB)
Table 2. Summary of Recorded Field Data for the Selected Sites in this Study.
Table 2. Summary of Recorded Field Data for the Selected Sites in this Study.
ID Year Soil Description Closest City Frost Depth (cm) AMT (°C) FI °C∗days
83_3802 93/94 Fat Inorganic Clay Winnipeg, MB 178 2.60 1775
87_1622 96/97 Sandy Silt Beatrice, ON 152 4.78 921
- 98/99 Silty Clay St. Célestin, QC 130 5.10 666
50_1002 02/03 Poorly Graded Gravel with Silt & Sand New Haven, VT 177 11.00 963
27_6251 02/03 Poorly Graded Sand with Silt Bemidji, MN 178 4.58 1339
30_0114 03/04 Poorly Graded Sand with Silt Great Falls, MT 76 8.25 486
36_0801 03/04 Silty Sand Hamlin, NY 71 4.25 1170
83_1801 02/03 Silty Sand Virden, MB 178 9.08 461
90_6405 95/96 Fat Inorganic Clay Viscount, SK 177 2.75 1607
Table 3. Pavement Structures and Subgrade Soil Classification per USCS.
Table 3. Pavement Structures and Subgrade Soil Classification per USCS.
Closest City Pavement Structure: Material (thickness in cm) Soil Type Soil Class
Winnipeg, MB AC (15.24) Concrete (24.89) Granular (12.446) Granular (14.986) Fat Inorganic Clay (CH) CH
Beatrice, ON AC (14.48) AC (11.68) Granular (17.02) Granular (66.80) Sandy Silt (ML) ML
St. Célestin, QC AC (18) Granular (30) Granular (42) Silty Clay (CL) CL
New Haven, VT AC (7.62) AC (13.97) Granular (65.53) Poorly Graded Gravel with Silt and Sand (GM) GM
Bemidji, MN AC (8.64) AC (14.73) Granular (25.91) Poorly Graded Sand with Silt (SP) SP
Great Falls, MT AC (19.05) Granular (31.50) Poorly Graded Sand with Silt (SP)
Hamlin, NY AC (3.05) AC (9.65) Granular (21.34) Silty Sand (SM) SM
Virden, MB AC (11.18) Granular (14.22) granular (33.53) Silty Sand (SM)
Viscount, SK AC (15.49) Granular (22.86) Sand Asphalt (6.35) Silty Sand (SM)
Table 4. Comparison between methods with reference to the measured field data.
Table 4. Comparison between methods with reference to the measured field data.
Soil Type Coarse Fine
Method MTO MTQ TCCA MTO MTQ TCCA
Min. 0% 7% 5% 6% 1% 4%
Max. 28% 44% 20% 18% 3% 27%
Standard Deviation 10% 13% 5% 6% 1% 11%
Average Difference 20% 28% 21% 12% 2% 14%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated