Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

Environmentally Friendly New Catalyst Using Waste Alkaline Solution from Aluminum Production for the Synthesis of Biodiesel in Aqueous Medium

Altmetrics

Downloads

131

Views

46

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

04 May 2023

Posted:

06 May 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Red mud (RM) is composed of a waste alkaline solution (pH = 13.3) obtained from the production of alumina. It contains high concentrations of soluble hematite (Fe2O3), goetite (FeOOH), gibisite [Al(OH)3], a boemite (AlOOH), anatase (Tetragonal - TiO2), rutile (Ditetragonal dipyramidal - TiO2), hydrogarnets [Ca3Al2(SiO4)3−x(OH)4x], and perovskite (CaTiO3). It was shown to be an excellent catalytic mixture for biodiesel production. To demonstrate the value of RM, an environmentally friendly process of transesterification in aqueous medium using waste cooking oil (WCO), MeOH and waste alkaline solution (WAS) obtained from aluminum production was proposed. Triglycerides of WCO reacted with MeOH at 60 oC to yield mixtures of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) in the presence of 0.019% (w/w) WAS/WCO using the WAS (0.204 mol L-1, predetermined by potentiometric titration) from aluminum production by the Bayer process. The use of the new catalyst (WAS) resulted in a high yield of the products (greater than 99% yield).
Keywords: 
Subject: Chemistry and Materials Science  -   Applied Chemistry

1. Introduction

Waste alkaline solution (WAS) and red mud (RM) (bauxite residue, bauxite tailings, red sludge, or alumina refinery residues) are industrial wastes generated during the processing of bauxite into alumina using the Bayer process (over 95% of the alumina is produced globally through the Bayer process). With every tonne of alumina produced, approximately 1 to 1.5 tonnes of RM are also produced. Annual production of alumina in 2020 was over 133 million tonnes, resulting in the generation of over 175 million tonnes of RM [1]. Because of this large production and the material's high alkalinity (pH of 10.5-12.5), caused by an elevated Na content and high concentrations of potentially toxic metals [2,3]. and potential leaching (groundwater, surface waters, soils and ocean ecosystems), it can pose a significant environmental hazard if not stored properly. Its storage is a critical environmental problem [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. This material is typically stored in dams, which demands prior preparation of the disposal area and includes monitoring and maintenance during the storage period [12].
A small residual amount of the sodium hydroxide used in the process remains with the residue. Various stages in the solid/liquid separation process have been introduced to recycle as much hydroxide as possible from the residue back into the Bayer Process to make the process as efficient as possible and reduce production costs. These modifications also lower the final alkalinity of the residue, making it easier and safer to handle and store [13].
The present study discusses the technical viability of RM valorization. The authors proposed the utilization of residual WAS from the aluminum industry for the first time as a catalyst in the transesterification reaction in aqueous medium for the production of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME).
FAME or biodiesel, according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and European standards (EN), is a fuel consisting of “long chain fatty acids of mono-alkyl esters derived from renewable fatty raw material such as animal fats or vegetable oils” [14]. FAME content needs to be higher than 96.5 wt.%. The total glycerol, including bound glycerol (in glycerides such as monoglycerides (MGs), diglycerides (DGs) and triglycerides (TGs) and unbound glycerol (free glycerol), needs to be limited to 0.24 and 0.25 wt.% by ASTM and EN standards, respectively.
In the search for an environmentally friendly method for biodiesel synthesis by transesterification of TGs, several alternatives for catalysis have been explored. In general, catalysts that can be used for producing biodiesel are divided into three categories: acidic, alkaline and biocatalysts. Acidic and alkaline catalysts are classified into two groups: homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts.
Catalysts play a vital role in the transesterification process. Both the amount and type of catalyst affect the rate of reaction and conversion efficiency. Homogeneous catalysts function in the same phase as the reactants and can be categorized into homogeneous base catalysts and homogeneous acid catalysts. Currently, most FAMEs are produced by the base-catalyzed transesterification reaction because of its high conversion rate, negligible side reactions, and short reaction time. It is a low-pressure and low-temperature process, which occurs without the formation of intermediate substances. Despite these advantages, homogeneous base catalysts have some weaknesses. The production of biodiesel from feedstocks with a high free fatty acid (FFA) content is limited. It was reported by some researchers that homogeneous base catalysts are only effective for the FAME production via the transesterification process using the feedstocks with a FFA content of less than 2 wt % [15]. When FFA content is >2%, the catalyst reacts with FFA to produce soap and water. The soap inhibits the separation of FAME and glycerin, and the water can hydrolyze the esters in a reaction that competes with the transesterification.
In transesterification reactions of TGs catalyzed by homogeneous bases, FAME and glycerol are produced. Zhang, Stanciulescu, and Ikura (2009) demonstrated that the use of phase transfer agents (PTA) greatly increased the rate of the base-catalyzed transesterification reaction [16]. A product containing 96.5 wt% was obtained after only 15 min of rapid reaction at 60 oC in the presence of tetrabutylammonium hydroxide or acetate. The reaction was performed in the presence of MeOH, glycerol, refined and bleached soybean oil and the basic catalyst, without the presence of water.
Recently, we also studied the acid-catalyzed transesterification reaction using WCO and a solid acidic catalyst (SiO2-SO3H) in the presence of quaternary ammonium salts as co-catalysts in toluene and DMSO [17]. We decided to study the transesterification reaction in a medium containing WAS. This study sought to utilize the industrial residues (RM; WAS) to increase their value and decrease the environmental problems resulting from the storage of these residues.

2. Experimental

2.1. Raw Materials and Chemicals

RM containing WAS was collected from ALCOA (Juruti, PA, Brazil). WCO (soybean) was donated by the university restaurant, and it was filtered through silica gel, which removed any fatty acids (FA) and polar and polymeric substances prior to use. The physical parameters determined for the yellow oil were the viscosity (41.2 mPa) and the density (0.883 g.mL-1). MeOH (analytical grade) was supplied by Vetec, São Paulo, Brazil.

2.2. Typical Procedures

2.2.1. Standardization of the WAS Generated during the Processing of Bauxite into Alumina using the Bayer Process

WAS (1.60 mL) was diluted to 100 mL. Subsequently, an aliquot of 1.00 mL was removed and diluted again to 100 mL. A 25 mL aliquot was collected from this solution and titrated with a 0.0017 M HCl solution using 0.48 mL of HCl solution. Titration was accomplished using a SI Analytics Titrator TitroLine® 7000 potentiometric titrator. The concentration of WAS determined was 0.204 mol L-1.

2.2.2. Elemental Analysis based on Energy-Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) of WAS (Chemical or Elemental Composition of WAS)

The pH value of the original WAS from RM was 13.3. The WAS sample was previously dried for 24 h in a muffle furnace at 150 °C. The equipment used in this procedure was an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer, model EDX 720 (Shimadzu®; Kyoto; Japan), equipped with an x-ray tube and the use of liquid nitrogen for cooling. The software used was PCEDX, version 1.11 Shimadzu®. Energy scattering X-ray fluorescence is a non-destructive multi-element analytical technique capable of identifying elements with higher atomic number Z or equal to 12. When the electrons of the innermost layer of the atom (for example, K and L) interact with photons in the X-ray region, then these electrons are ejected, creating a vacancy. To promote the stability, the electronic vacancies are immediately filled by electrons from the closest layers (Kα, Kβ or Lα, Lβ), resulting in an excess of energy in the process, which is manifested in the form of the emission of X-rays characteristic of each atom present in the sample.
The EDXRF is an apparatus used for the quantitative and quali-quantitative determination of chemical elements in a wide range of samples. The analyses carried out in this work used qualitative and quantitative determination, with only the pre-calibration of the equipment (Al ≥ 80% and the detection of Sn and Cu), using only atmospheric air, and restricting the detection of metals included between 13Al and 92U. The samples were placed in sample holders made of polypropylene film and the analysis conditions were as follows: 10 mm collimator, scans with voltages of 0-40 KeV (Ti-U) and 0-20 KeV (Na-Sc) with a time of 100 seconds for each sample.
In this method, the material to be analyzed is hit with an X-ray beam that interacts with the atoms of the sample causing the ionization of the innermost layers of the atoms. The filling of the resulting vacancies, by more peripheral electrons, induces the emission of X-rays characteristic of the constituent elements of the sample. The elemental composition of WAS analyzed by EDXRF was (in wt.%): Al, 54.58; Si, 39.54; K, 1.99; V, 1.88; Ga, 0.95; Cs, 0.33; Cr, 0,174, Fe, 0.142, Br, 0.089, Cu, 0.079, Mo, 0.069, Tl, 0.064, Ag 0.064 and Zr, 0.047. EDXRF was used as a method for semi-quantitative elemental analysis, and the titanium derivates were not quantified. Their concentrations were lower than the quantification limit. However, their presence was clearly observed in the powder XRD spectra.

2.2.3. Experimental X-ray Diffraction of Dehydrated WAS. Characterization of the Material by Powder XRD

The measurements were carried out using a Shimadzu model XRD-6000 diffractometer using CuKα monochromatic radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm - 40 kV and 30 mA) at a scan rate of 2.0 degrees.s−1 covering the 2θ scale from 10-80°.
The measurements were carried out using a Shimadzu model XRD-6000 diffractometer using CuKα monochromatic radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm - 40 kV and 30 mA) at a scan rate of 2.0 degrees.s−1 covering the 2θ scale from 10-80°.
WAS was dried at 150 °C before experimental X-ray diffraction. The XRD patterns of the dehydrated WAS (200 °C) are shown in Figure 1. The most common mineral phases present in the WAS were hematite (Fe2O3), goetite (FeOOH), gibisite (Al(OH)3), a boemite (AlOOH), titanium mineral as anatase (Tetragonal - TiO2), and rutile (Ditetragonal dipyramidal - TiO2), the hydrogarnets group [Ca3Al2(SiO4)3−x(OH)4x], such as Fe3Al2(SiO4)3, and perovskite (CaTiO3). The WAS composition agrees with that of the EDXRF identification, in which aluminosilicate was confirmed to be the principal component, with traces of iron, chromium and cupper that can act as active species in the catalysis or in a synergic catalysis process with potassium [18,19].

2.2.4. Thermal Gravimetric (TG) Analysis Technology of Dehydrated WAS

WAS had been dried at 150 °C before thermogravimetric analysis. The TG curve (Figure 2, red) of the WAS indicates intense mass loss between the initial heating phase, 30 ºC up to 253 ºC, i.e., 76%, with a corresponding endotherm displayed by the simultaneous DTA curve (Figure 2, black), which is equivalent to removal of moisture from the sample. The highlighted photos show the crucible containing the sample before (upper left) and after (upper right) the analysis. Note the presence of a white solid residue representing 24% of the sample.
Preprints 72749 g002
Figure 1. Thermal analysis WAS.
Figure 1. Thermal analysis WAS.
Preprints 72749 g002

2.2.5. Reacting the TGs from WCO with MeOH using WAS as Catalyst

The procedure utilized for the transesterification reaction was based on various trials to determine the optimum conditions for this reaction. A 150-mL round bottom flask containing WAS (0.204 molL-1; 0.090 mL, 1,84x10-5 mol NaOH, or 0.019% w/w of WCO or 0.0040 mol/mol of WCO) with MeOH (3.75 mL, 2.9738 g, 0.0928 mol; or 1:18 molar ratio of WCO/MeOH) was stirred for 20 min at room temperature.
WCO (4.4170 g, 5.0 mL; 5.0510-3 mol) and MeOH (3.75 mL, 2.9738 g, 0.0928 mol) or 1:18 molar ratio of WCO/MeOH) were mixed in a second 150-mL round bottom flask equipped with a reflux condenser, and the mixture was refluxed for 60 min. at 60 oC. The addition of the contents of the first flask to the mixture containing WCO and MeOH was recorded as time zero. The mixture was heated under reflux at 60 oC for one hour. The mixture was cooled and transferred to a separatory funnel, where the biofuel-containing upper phase was separated from the lower phase containing glycerol by decantation. The MeOH was removed from the biodiesel phase on a rotary evaporator, purified by distillation and used in new reaction processes within this study. The recovered glycerol was stored for future treatments. The biofuel phase was dissolved in hexane (20 mL), extracted with 20 mL of a saturated solution of NaCl, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated.

2.3. WCO and Biodiesel Analysis

The official methods proposed by ISO 12966 were used to determine the compositional profile by gas chromatography using a flame ionization detector (GC-FID) (Shimadzu GC-2010). The chromatographic system used to separate and identify FFAs (wt%) included a cross-bound polyethylene glycol capillary column (Supelco SP 2560, 100 m x 0.25 mm x 20 µm). The initial temperature was 60 °C for 2 minutes; the temperature increased to 220 °C at 10 °C.min-1, and finally, to 240 °C at 5 °C.min-1, where it was held for 7 min. The injector and detector temperatures were 350 °C, and the sample (0.5 µL injected) was dissolved in 99% iso-octane.
The EN 14103 and the Brazilian Technical Standards Association (ABNT NBR 15908) were used to quantify FAMEs and remaining mono-, di- and triglycerides (MG, DG, TG) in the FAME (biodiesel). For quantification of FAMEs, a Thermo Trace GC-Ultra chromatograph was used, equipped with a flame ionization detector and a Thermo Scientific TR-BD (FAME) Capillary GC Column (L × I.D. 30 m × 0.25 mm, df 0.25 μm) containing a polyethylene glycol stationary phase, according to the EN 14103 analytical procedure. Pure methyl nonadecanoate (C19:0, Sigma-Aldrich) was used as an internal standard to normalize the peak areas of the chromatograms. The integration was achieved from the methyl hexanoate (C6:0) peak to that of the methyl nervonate (C24:1), including all the peaks identified as FAMEs. To analyze the FAME samples, approximately 100 mg (accuracy ± 0.1 mg) of homogenized sample and approximately 100 mg (accuracy ± 0.1 mg) of nonadecanoic acid methyl ester were weighed in a 10 mL vial and diluted with 10 mL of toluene before injection into the equipment. All the samples were prepared in duplicate. Chromatographic conditions are described as follows: (a) column temperature: 60 °C held for 2 min, programmed at 10 °C.min-1 to 200 °C, then programmed at 5 °C.min-1 to 240 °C; the final temperature was held for 7 min; (b) injector and detector temperature: 250 °C; (c) helium carrier gas flow rate: 1-2 mL.min-1, a minimum flow rate of 1 mL.min-1 was warranted when operating at the maximum temperature; (d) injected volume: 1 μL and (e) split flow: 100 mL.min-1.
For the quantification of the glycerides (MG, DG, and TG), a Shimadzu GC2010 chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector was used according to the ASTM D6584 analytical procedure. The chromatographic system was configured to separate and identify MG, DG and TG with a CrossbondTM 5% Phenyl/95% dimethylpolysiloxane capillary column (Zebron ZB-5HT, 30 m x 0.32 mm x 0.1 mm - Phenomenex, Torrence, CA) with on-column injection. The initial temperature in the capillary column was 50 ºC (1 min); the temperature increased to 180 ºC at 15 ºC min-, to 230 ºC at 7 ºC.min-1, and finally to 380 ºC at 20 ºC.min-1, where it was held for 10 min. The injector and detector temperatures were 380 ºC, and the sample (0.5 mL injected) was prepared using heptane 99%. 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance 400 and Avance 500 spectrometers. These data are included in the supplementary material.

2.3.1. Thermogravimetry Analysis

The thermal behavior of FAME was evaluated by Thermogravimetry (TG), and the data were treated simultaneously in the first derivative, Thermogravimetry derivative (DTG) and Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA). TG/DTA curves were obtained on a DTG60H Shimadzu thermobalance; the heating rate was 10 ºC.min-1 and the temperature range was 25-350 ºC under a controlled nitrogen atmosphere at 50 mL.min-1 and under oxidizing conditions (synthetic air). An open alumina crucible with sample mass accurately weighed about 20 mg. The derivative curve was obtained by T.A. data software.

3. Results and Discussion

The compositional profile analysis of the WCO used in this work is described in Table 1. The main fatty acids (FAs) in that WCO were linoleic (C18:2) and oleic acids (C18:1); accordingly, the mean molecular weight (MW) of the FAs was determined to be 277.41 g.mol-1, and the mean molecular mass (MM) of the TGs was 873.22 g.mol-1. The composition of the WCO was very similar to that of soybean oil (SO) described in the literature [20]. This profile was considered for calculating the molar ratio of WCO: MeOH for the transesterification reaction.
Sodium methoxide (MeONa), is formed by the deprotonation of MeOH and is frequently prepared by treating MeOH with metallic sodium [21]:
2 Na + 2 CH3OH → 2 CH3ONa + H2
The resulting solution, MeONa/MeOH, which is colorless, is often used as a source of MeONa. The MeONa absorbs CO2 from the air to form MeOH and Na2CO3, thereby diminishing the alkalinity of the base.
CH3ONa + CO2 + H2O → 2 CH3OH + Na2CO3
MeONa is highly basic and reacts with water to give MeOH and NaOH. In this work, we used a solution of WAS (0.204 mol/L, determined by potentiometric titration) which leads to a very low concentration of MeONa. Thus, we believe that the reaction did not occur as a result of a nucleophilic attack by MeONa on the ester carbonyl groups of TGs, DGs and MGs.
In an unprecedented process, biodiesel was produced by catalysis using a WAS obtained from the aluminum industry for the transesterification reaction of WCO. The WAS-catalyzed transesterification is a rapid reaction at both initial and final reaction stages because it is not limited by mass transfer between the polar water/MeOH/glycerol phase and the non-polar MGs, DGs and TGs phase.
Zhang, Stanciulescu, and Ikura (2009) used a total OH-/oil molar ratio of 0.22 [22]. In this study, we believe that the low molar concentration of hydroxide (0.019% w/w of WCO or 0.0040 mol/mol of WCO) is related to gibisite (Al(OH)3), and the fact that the hematite(Fe2O3) contained in WAS forms an anionic iron species in the presence of hydroxide ion. According to Ishikawa, Yoshioka, Sato and Okuwaki (1997), hematite in the presence of sodium hydroxide leads to the formation of NaFeO2 (FeO2-) [23].
Fe2O3(s) + 2NaOH(aq) → 2FeO2- + 2Na+ + H2O
Species like FeO2- might facilitate the formation of the nucleophilic species MeO- in a medium containing MeOH. Wang et al. (2022) have shown that the NaFeO2-Fe3O4 composite from blast furnace dust acts as an efficient catalyst for the production of biodiesel [24]. They obtained the catalyst by treatment of the blast furnace dust with different proportions of sodium carbonate and calcining the mixture. The catalyst was recycled, and high yields were still obtained (Na2CO3⋅H2O@BFD300), 93.00 wt% at the eighth use (NaHCO3@BFD300) and 96.16 wt% at the seventh use (Na2CO3⋅10H2O@BFDun). The highest yields for sustainable biodiesel production were obtained with Na2CO3⋅H2O@BFD300 catalyst as a result of the reaction of impregnated Na2CO3 with Fe2O3 in the blast furnace dust to produce stable and active nanocomponents of NaFeO2 (32.42 nm) and a magnetic nanocomponent of Fe3O4 (3.14 nm and Ms of 6.16 Am2/kg). Blast furnace dust was a suitable raw material for catalyst synthesis to produce soybean biodiesel by the transesterification reaction in a non-aqueous medium. This composite would also be formed in the residue from aluminum production and would explain the high yield of biodiesel obtained even though the free hydroxide concentration was very low.
Liu et al. [25] and Wang et al. [26] reported that the alkaline content of the material from the Bayer process includes soluble NaOH, Na2CO3, NaAlO2, Na2SiO3, and sodium aluminosilicate hydrate (Na2O.Al2O3.xSiO2.mH2O; zeolite) generated from the reaction between the bauxite and the highly alkaline solution. Pampararo and Debecker [27] observed that sodium aluminate (NaAlO2) was an effective catalyst for the preparation of biodiesel from refined sunflower oil in a moisture-free process. The catalyst was calcined to remove any moisture because the material was hygroscopic. The oil was also heated to remove any moisture. They showed that the activity of the catalyst was a function of its basicity. The waste material utilized in our study contained 54.581% aluminum [gibisite (Al(OH)3), a boemite (AlOOH), and hydrogarnets Ca3Al2(SiO4)3−x(OH)4x], and one would expect that this component would be the principal agent responsible for the catalysis of the transesterification reaction, either directly or indirectly via the equilibrium with the hematite (Fe2O3), goetite (FeOOH), anatase (tetragonal - TiO2), rutile (ditetragonal dipyramidal - TiO2), and perovskite (CaTiO3). The solution was used directly in the form that it was produced by the industry. No calcination was performed. The activity of WAS was slightly higher than that of the NaFeO2-Fe3O4, Na2CO3⋅H2O@BFD300), and Na2CO3⋅10H2O@BFDun described above.

3.1. Transesterification of TGs from WCO with MeOH using WAS

In this study, a excess of MeOH was mixed with standardized WAS, and WCO and refluxed at 60 oC. The progress of the reaction was monitored using thin layer chromatography (TLC). The total consumption of TGs occurred after 60 minutes. The FAMEs and glycerides (MG, DG, and TG) contained in the biodiesel phase were confirmed by GC-FID using the methods defined in EN 14103 and ASTM D6584. The composition of the products (FAMEs and glycerides) is presented in Table 2; they represent the average values of five different measurements.
The composition of the products (FAMEs and glycerides) after 10.0 minutes of reaction is presented in Table 2; they represent the average values of five different measurements. The yields for completed transesterification reactions are presented in Table 3.

3.2. Thermogravimetry Analysis of FAME

Under inert conditions (N2 atmosphere), FAME ignites at 140 ºC, as seen in the TG curve (top Figure 3, red) involving two overlapping thermal decomposition mechanisms, as seen in the dotted highlight of the DTG curve (top Figure 3, pink). In the thermal decomposition range, 140 - 295 °C, a broad endothermic event occurs, as seen in the DTA curve (top Figure 3, black), characteristic of this phenomenon. Biodiesel burned almost entirely, with 98.6% loss in mass. The photos in the detail of Figure 3, top, show the alumina crucible containing the sample, before ignition and after firing up to 350 ºC.
Under oxidizing conditions (under an atmosphere of synthetic air), biodiesel undergoes ignition from 124 ºC, as observed in the TG curve (Figure 1, bottom, red), that is, at a lower temperature than under inert conditions because the supply of oxygen favors the combustion process. The DTG curve (Figure 3, bottom, pink) indicates some inflections of the TG curve, as seen in dotted details, showing the complexity of the mechanisms of thermal decomposition of biodiesel under an oxidizing condition. This phenomenon is also marked by a broad endothermic curve (DTA curve, Figure 3, bottom, black) over the full range of decomposition (124 - 307°C). Biodiesel is burned almost entirely, with 98.6% mass loss. The photos in the detail of Figure 3, top, show the alumina crucible containing the sample before ignition and after firing up to 350 ºC. Note the carbonization intensity of the sample, consistent with the oxidizing condition.

4. Conclusions

The transesterification reaction of TGs from WCO catalyzed by WAS {containing soluble hematite (Fe2O3), goetite (FeOOH), gibisite (Al(OH)3), a boemite (AlOOH), anatase (Tetragonal - TiO2), rutile (Ditetragonal dipyramidal - TiO2), hydrogarnets [Ca3Al2(SiO4)3−x(OH)4x], and perovskite (CaTiO3)}. The WAS (catalytic red mud solution) was used successfully for the transesterification of TGs from WCO with MeOH. Analysis of the quantities of TGs, DGs, MGs and FAMEs in the products indicated excellent catalytic behavior of the WAS. The WAS-catalyzed transesterification rate was indicated by the high FAME yield obtained after only 30 min of reaction. The observed rapid transesterification can be explained by the fact that WAS can facilitate ion transfer between the polar water/MeOH/glycerol phase and non-polar WCO phase, overcome mass transfer limitations and speed up reaction rates. Product analyses showed that a FAME content higher than 99.5 wt.% was achieved after only 30 min of rapid transesterification. Free and total glycerol contents in the final products after 30 min of transesterification were lower than the maximum legal limits in standard specifications for FAME. WAS from RM contained Fe2O3, FeOOH, Al(OH)3, AlOOH, TiO2, Ca3Al2(SiO4)3−x(OH)4x, and CaTiO3. The catalyst was suitable for the synthesis of FAME from WCO by the transesterification reaction in aqueous medium.
This method employing WAS as a catalyst could enable recycling of the waste alkaline solution from the bauxite process, minimize contaminants, and reduce the cost of the catalyst. This highly efficient and low-cost WAS catalyst could make the process of FAME production more economical. In addition to FAME production, such environmentally friendly WAS catalysts should find application in a wide range of other important base-catalysed organic reactions, such as the Michael reaction or Michael 1,4 addition.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support by the SENAI CIMATEC and PRPPG/UFVJM in response to Resolução 15/2019 and the Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais - FAPEMIG (Chamada Universal), 0004022 code.

References

  1. Evans K., "The History, Challenges and new developments in the management and use of Bauxite Residue", J. Sustain Metall. May 2016. [CrossRef]
  2. Wang L., Sun N., Tang H., Sun W. A review on comprehensive utilization of red mud and prospect analysis. Minerals 9 (2019) 362. [CrossRef]
  3. Chao X., Zhang TA., Lv G., Chen Y., Li X., Yang X. Comprehensive application technology of bauxite residue treatment in the ecological environment: a review. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 109 (2022) 209-214. [CrossRef]
  4. Bray AW., Stewart DI., Courtney R., Rout SP., Humphreys N., Mayes WM., Burke IT. Sustained Bauxite Residue Rehabilitation with Gypsum and Organic Matter 16 years after Initial Treatment, Environmental Science & Technology 52 (2018) 152-161.
  5. Burke IT, Mayes WM., Peacock CL., Brown AP., Jarvis AP., Gruiz K., Speciation of Arsenic, Chromium, and Vanadium in Red Mud Samples from the Ajka Spill Site, Hungary, Environmental Science & Technology 46 (2012) 3085-3092.
  6. Burke IT., Peacock CL., Lockwood CL., Stewart DI., Mortimer RJG., Ward MB., Renforth P., Gruiz K., Mayes WM. Behavior of Aluminum, Arsenic, and Vanadium during the Neutralization of Red Mud Leachate by HCl, Gypsum, or Seawater, Environmental Science & Technology 47 (2013) 6527-6535.
  7. Gelencsér A., Kováts N., Turóczi B., Rostási Á., Hoffer Á., Imre K., Nyirő-Kósa I., Csákberényi-Malasics D., Tóth Á., Czitrovszky A., Nagy A., Nagy S., Ács A., Kovács A., Ferincz Á., Hartyáni Z., Pósfai M. The Red Mud Accident in Ajka (Hungary): Characterization and Potential Health Effects of Fugitive Dust, Environmental Science & Technology 45 (2011) 1608-1615.
  8. Gupta, VK., Sharma, S. Removal of Cadmium and Zinc from Aqueous Solutions Using Red Mud, Environmental Science & Technology 36 (2002) 3612-3617.
  9. Ruyters S., Mertens J., Vassilieva E., Dehandschutter B., Poffijn A., Smolders E. The Red Mud Accident in Ajka (Hungary): Plant Toxicity and Trace Metal Bioavailability in Red Mud Contaminated Soil, Environmental Science & Technology 45 (2011) 1616-1622.
  10. Santini TC., Fey MV. Spontaneous Vegetation Encroachment upon Bauxite Residue (Red Mud) As an Indicator and Facilitator of In Situ Remediation Processes, Environmental Science & Technology 47 (2013) 12089-12096.
  11. De Resende EC., Gissane G., Nicol R., Heck RJ., Guerreiro MC., Coelho JV., de Oliveira LCA., Palmisano P., Berruti F., Briens C., Schlaf M. Synergistic co-processing of Red Mud waste from the Bayer process and a crude untreated waste stream from bio-diesel production, Green Chemistry 15 (2013) 496-510.
  12. Silveira NCG., Martins MLF., Bezerra ACS., Araújo FGS. Red Mud from the Aluminium Industry: Production, Characteristics, and Alternative Applications in Construction Materials-A Review. Sustainability 13 (2021) 12741. [CrossRef]
  13. Chandra, S. "Red Mud Utilization". Waste materials used in concrete manufacturing. (1996) 292-295. ISBN 978-0-8155-1393-3.
  14. ASTM D6751-20a; License Agreement, Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels. ASTM: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2020.
  15. Patel RL., Sankhavara C. Biodiesel production from Karanja oil and its use in diesel engine: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 71 (2017) 464-474.
  16. Zhang Y., Stanciulescu M, Ikura M. Rapid transesterification of soybean oil with phase transfer catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General 366 (2009) 176-183.
  17. Barbosa SL., Rocha ACP., Nelson DL., Freitas MS., Mestre AAPF., Klein SI., Clososki GC., Caires FJ., Flumignan DL., Santos LK., Wentz AP, Pasa VMD. and Rios RDF. Catalytic Transformation of Triglycerides to Biodiesel with SiO2-SO3H and Quaternary Ammonium Salts in Toluene or DMSO. Molecules 27 (2022) 953. [CrossRef]
  18. Thangaraj B, Solomon PR, Muniyandi B, Ranganathan S, Lin L. Catalysis in biodiesel production-a review. Clean Energy 3(1) (2020) 2-23. [CrossRef]
  19. Botti RF, Innocentini MDM, Faleiros TA, Mello MF, Flumignan DL, Santos LK, Franchin G, Colombo P. Biodiesel Processing Using Sodium and Potassium Geopolymer Powders as Heterogeneous Catalysts. Molecules 25 (2020) 2839. [CrossRef]
  20. Martínez G., Sánchez N., Encinar J.M., González J.F. Fuel properties of biodiesel from vegetable oils and oil mixtures. Influence of methyl esters distribution. Biomass Bioenergy. 63 (2014) 22-32.
  21. Zhang Y., Stanciulescu M, Ikura M. Rapid transesterification of soybean oil with phase transfer catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General 366 (2009) 176-183.
  22. Chandran K., Kamruddin M., Ajikumar P.K., et al. "Kinetics of thermal decomposition of sodium methoxide and ethoxide". Journal of Nuclear Materials. 358(2-3) (2006) 111-128. Bibcode:2006JNuM. 358.111C. ISSN 0022-3115. [CrossRef]
  23. Ishikawa K., Yoshioka T., Sato T., Okuwaki A. “Solubility of hematite in LiOH, NaOH and KOH solutions”. Hydrometallurgy 45 (1997) 129-135.
  24. Wang X-M., Zeng Y-N., Jiang Li-Q., Wang Yi-T., Li J-G., Kang Le-Le, Ji R., Gao D., Wang F-P., Yu Q., Wang Ya-J., Ji A-M., Fang Z. Highly stable NaFeO2-Fe3O4 composite catalyst from blast furnace dust for efficient production of biodiesel at low temperature. Industrial Crops & Products 182 (2022) 114937. [CrossRef]
  25. Liu Y., Lin CX., Wu Y.G. Characterization of red mud derived from a combined Bayer process and bauxite calcinations method. J. Hazard Mater. 146 (2007) 255e261. [CrossRef]
  26. Wang Z, Han MF, Zhang YH, Zhou FS. Study on the dealkalization technics of Bayer process red mud with CO2 by carbonation. Bull Chin Ceramic Soc 32(9) (2013) 1851-1855 (in Chinese).
  27. Pampararo G, Debecker D. Sodium aluminate-catalyzed synthesis of biodiesel. ChemRxiv. Cambridge: Cambridge Open Engage; 2023; This content is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed.
Preprints 72749 g001
Figure 1. PXRD (X-ray diffraction patterns) of dehydrated WAS (dry solid).
Figure 1. PXRD (X-ray diffraction patterns) of dehydrated WAS (dry solid).
Preprints 72749 g001
Preprints 72749 g003
Figure 3. Thermal behavior of biodiesel in inert (N2) conditions (upper graph), and oxidant (air) conditions (bottom graph).
Figure 3. Thermal behavior of biodiesel in inert (N2) conditions (upper graph), and oxidant (air) conditions (bottom graph).
Preprints 72749 g003
Table 1. FAs composition of the WCO used in this study.
Table 1. FAs composition of the WCO used in this study.
FA MW (g.mol-1) wt%
Linoleic acid (C18:2) 280.45 51.66
Oleic acid (C18:1) 282.46 26.52
Palmitic acid (C16:0) 256.43 10.41
Linolenic acid (C18:3) 278.43 5.55
Stearic acid (C18:0) 284.48 3.91
Others - 1.95
Average MW of FAs (g.mol-1) 277.41
MM of TGs (g.mol-1) 873.22
Lit [17]: Palmitic acid, 11.6%; stearic acid, 3.22%; oleic acid, 25.09%; linoleic acid, 52.93%; linolenic acid, 5.95%; others, 1.08%.
Table 2. Composition of the WCO feedstock and the product mixture using refluxing MeOH.
Table 2. Composition of the WCO feedstock and the product mixture using refluxing MeOH.
Products WCO (wt%) New Mixture Catalyst WAS
Triacylglycerides (%) 96.2± 5.9±
Diacylglycerides (%) 2.80± 11.0±
Monoacylglycerides (%) 1.0± 22.9±
FAME (%) 0 60.2±
Table 2. Numerical data for Figure 2.
Table 3. Composition of the WCO feedstock and the product of transesterification of TGs from WCO with MeOH using WAS as the catalyst.
Table 3. Composition of the WCO feedstock and the product of transesterification of TGs from WCO with MeOH using WAS as the catalyst.
New Mixture Catalyst WAS
Assay Result
(% w/w)		 Standard Deviation
FAME 99.52± 2.94
Free glycerol (FG) 0.01 0.01
Total glycerol (TG) 0.07 0.07
MG 0.26 0.26
DG 0.06 0.12
TG 0.01 0.25
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated