COVID-19 is an acute infectious disease caused by the RNA-based SARS-CoV-2 virion of the genus Betacoronavirus. The first cases of COVID-19 were registered in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. By March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) had officially declared COVID-19 a global pandemic [
1,
2,
3]. As do most viral infections, COVID-19 begins with the virus entering the cell via interactions between viral proteins and complementary receptors on host cellular membranes. SARS-CoV-2 has two ways of entering cells, either through membrane fusion or viral particle uptake. This can activate various innate immune PRRs depending on the mode of entry. For membrane fusion to occur, the cellular receptors ACE2, TMPRSS2, and sometimes NRP1 are necessary. Once fusion happens, the virus's genetic material is released into the host cell's cytoplasm. In COVID-19, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE 2) receptor usually acts as the major entry point for the virus. It is widely represented in human cells: pneumocytes, enterocytes, vascular endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and even glia [
4,
5,
6].
Most SARS-CoV-2 target cells are located in the upper and lower parts of the respiratory system. In addition to inflammation caused by interactions between viral spike protein (S protein) and the ACE 2 receptor, there is also the subsequent inhibition of this receptor. This leads to the enhanced expressions of genes responsible for angiotensin II secretion. In turn, angiotensin II binds to Toll-like receptors (type II), which activates inflammatory transcription factors (IRF, IkBɑ, NF-kB). Due to the nuances of COVID-19, such conditions can lead to enhanced inflammation which can potentially activate a so-called ‘cytokine storm’.
2.2. Changes in MDC/CCL22 concentrations in COVID-19 in vitro and in vivo
Adequate regulation of the immune response is the key factor in disease severity. As COVID-19 progresses, it is often accompanied by immunity dysregulation, from both cellular and humoral links of the immune responses. Therefore, studying regulatory molecules (cytokines, chemokines) included in this process is vital for understanding COVID-19 immunity.
Within our work, we have studied both cytokines and chemokines in COVID-19, and we also took different approaches to experimental design and data analysis. As the pandemic progressed, newer points of interest emerged: for instance, we investigated the value of cytokine profiling in acute infection and persisting patterns in convalescent patients [
16]. We also explored predictors of disease severity among cytokines/chemokines [
17], and suggested a model for prognosis of the disease outcome. However, as the virus changed, we have realized that the immunological landscape went through certain changes as well. Therefore, our study group decided to pay closer attention to the role of viral genetics in COVID-19 immunity [
18].
Among the biological substances highlighted in our previous studies (CCL2/MCP-1, CCL3/MIP-1α, CCL4/MIP-1β, CCL7/MCP-3, CCL11/Eotaxin, CCL22/MDC, CXCL1/GROα, CXCL8/IL-8, CXCL9/MIG, CXCL10/IP-10, and CX3CL1/Fractalkine, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-9, IL-12 (p40), IL-12 (p70), IL-13, IL-15, IL-17A/CTLA8, IL-18, IL-22, IL-27, IFNα2, IFNγ, TNFα, TNFβ/Lymphotoxin-α (LTA), IL-1ra, IL-10, EGF, FGF-2/FGF-basic, Flt3 Ligand, G-CSF, M-CSF, GM-CSF, PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB/BB, TGF-α, and VEGF-A), the most prominent and unexpected role belongs to one of the CC chemokines, macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC/CCL22). Specifically, significantly lower MDC/CCL22 concentrations were seen in COVID-19 patient plasma, independent of SARS-CoV-2 genetic variant (original Wuhan strain, Alpha, Delta or Omicron variant). This finding was especially interesting in comparison to other chemokines, as their concentrations showed a tendency to rise in the blood plasma of COVID-19 patients in comparison with healthy donors (HD). A shortened version of our original study comparing four genetic variants of SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan strain, Alpha, Delta, Omicron variants) in terms of MDC/CCL22 concentration is presented in
Figure 2 [
18].
At early stages of the pandemic, when we studied patterns of cytokine profiling in acute phase patients and convalescents, we discovered a note-worthy tendency concerning MDC/CCL22 levels. Interestingly, convalescents of the original Wuhan viral strain had significantly lower MDC/CCL22 concentrations, not only compared to healthy donors, but also in comparison with those in the acute phase of infection. The results of previous studies on the matter are presented in
Figure 3 [
16].
As seen, the levels of MDC/CCL22 have been observed to decrease in patients with acute COVID-19, and surprisingly, they remain low in convalescents as well. This notion suggests that the impact of the virus on the immune system may be more profound than previously thought. It is unclear whether this decrease is solely due to the virus's effects on DCs. However, recent studies indicate that MDC/CCL22 may be crucial for regulating immune responses and preventing excessive inflammation by recruiting regulatory T cells. Thus, the deficiency of MDC/CCL22 in COVID-19 patients may contribute to immune dysregulation and severe pulmonary pathology. Further research is necessary to fully comprehend the complex interactions between MDC/CCL22, DCs, platelets, and immune regulation in COVID-19.
The observed concentration dynamics can be explained by a possible ‘depletion’ of MDC/CCL22 production, even in the next few months after recovery. It is worth mentioning that, in other studies concerning other inflammation prone illnesses, MDC/CCL22 rarely shows such a decrease, even in diseases affecting the respiratory tract. Therefore, such consistently lower concentrations may be specific to COVID-19 and require thorough investigation.
Our previous studies showed that COVID-19 recovery is often associated with decreases in several cytokines, MDC/CCL22 being only one of them [
16,
17,
18]. Such a depletion and dysregulation in the cytokine branch has been described by other researchers in works concerning the first 8 months since the recovery [
19,
20]. At the same time, we noted changes affecting cellular immunity [
21] even more than 6 months after recovery: for instance, decrease in CD8+ effector subsets and higher frequencies of CD8+ T cell subsets expressing lung tissue and mucosal tissue homing molecules (Tc2, Tc17, and Tc17.1). This finding was confirmed by other researchers [
22,
23]. It therefore proves that COVID-19 has a certain effect on immune cells and their mediators even after recovery.
In the study by Ling et al., a statistically significant decrease in MDC/CCL22 was noted not only during acute COVID-19, but also a year after the infection [
24]. This data overlaps with our own findings: in convalescent patients we noted a statistically significant decrease of MDC/CCL22 between 30 and 100 days since the onset of the disease. Tufa et al. confirmed our finding concerning lower levels of MDC/CCL22 in patients with COVID-19, as their study highlighted the same tendency [
23]. Noteworthy is the fact that they reported negative correlation between MDC/CCL22 and the severity of COVID-19.
Recent research has suggested that the deficiency of MDC/CCL22, a protein that plays a crucial role in regulating inflammation, could potentially contribute to the persistent lymphopenia observed in COVID-19 patients. This phenomenon has been reported to persist even after patients have recovered from the virus [
24,
25]. Several in vitro studies have shown the importance of MDC/CCL22 in regulation of inflammation [
9,
26,
27]. Its presence complemented regulatory T cell activation and restricted enhanced inflammation with type I helper T cells. Therefore, MDC/CCL22 plays the role of ambivalent inflammation regulator, from both activating and inhibiting standpoints.
Such findings provide grounds for discussing changes in immunity both in acute phase infection and in COVID-19 convalescents. In 2022, the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) registered a new diagnosis of 'post-COVID syndrome', which included a wide spectrum of symptoms noticeable long after COVID-19 recovery [
27]. These symptoms include fatigue, shortness of breath and chronic cough, muscle and joint pains, heart palpitations, persistent vascular changes, i.e. recurrent thrombosis, and mental health issues (anxiety, depression, memory and concentration loss). The reasons behind these symptoms are yet to be investigated.
Studying post-COVID is a new challenge brought by the pandemic, and this challenge has yet to be overcome by global scientific efforts. As the consequences and complications of this novel phenomenon are being discovered, the mechanisms behind post-COVID are still unknown. Even now, however, it is clear that cytokines (and chemokines) play a pivotal role in the immune responses behind this process. Keeping in mind the knowledge already collected and described in the past, we may presume that MDC/CCL22 plays a bigger role in post-COVID than currently understood.
2.6. Possible mechanisms behind the decrease in MDC/CCL22 concentrations in COVID-19
We believe that the drop in MDC/CCL22 concentration in COVID-19 patients is worthy of attention. Since the reasons behind this occurence are yet unclear, we present hypothetical explanations for the phenomenon in question in
Figure 4.
Our hypothesis implies two possible mechanisms for lower MDC/CCL22 concentrations in COVID-19.
The first mechanism implies possible binding of SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins with MDC/CCL22 due to potential affinity with, or mimicry of, MDC/CCL22's main ligands. In such cases, MDC/CCL22 production by producer cells (i.e., DCs and macrophages) is unperturbed. Yet, the selective binding of this chemokine makes it undetectable for commercial kits as it changes its antigenic structure. Moreover, it is possible that its functional activity reduces due to this process. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that other cytokines and chemokines, produced by DCs and macrophages, show enhanced expression when compared to healthy donors [
9,
10,
11,
12,
19,
40]. The infectious agent requires mechanisms of evading the immune responses, and one of the potential ways is to block chemoattraction by inactivating chemokines [
41]. Although the concept of chemokine binding proteins is not entirely new, the nature of these peptides or proteins and their specific properties are yet to be discovered, and the whole concept of protein-based binding in COVID-19 requires in vitro experiments. Proteomics studies concerning cytokine dysregulation in presence of SARS-CoV-2 proteins have been previously performed [
42], yet there is no information covering potential interactions between MDC/CCL2 and viral proteins. Among known proteins, ORF (open reading frame) 8 is known to bind with the dendritic cells and alternate cytokine expression [
43]. At the same time, S protein of SARS-CoV-2 was shown to play a part in activation of several proinflammatory cytokines [
44]. Within the same study, no such inflammatory response was observed in response to membrane (M), envelope (E), and nucleocapsid (N) proteins. However, S protein is known to be less conservative [
45]: it undergoes changes in its structure with each genetic change in the virion proteins’ structure. N-protein structure is believed to be more stable, and as MDC/CCL22 shows stable concentrations independent of the genetic variant, it is more likely to be a target for MDC/CCL22 binding. In the study by López-Muñoz it is shown that N-protein binds chemokines through its GAG-binding domain and inhibits in vitro chemokine-mediated leukocyte migration [
46]. In other viral infections such binding of chemokines to viral proteins is well-known and previously described [
47].
There is, however, an opposite hypothesis, implying that COVID-19 can actually affect functional activity of macrophage-derived chemokine producer cells. Specifically, researchers highlighted a significant shortage of DCs in COVID-19 patients, both in acute and post-recovery periods [
49,
50,
51]. Such shortage is seen not only in quantitative, but also in qualitative way: specifically, in vitro studies showed depletion of functional activity in dendritic cells [
52]. Moreover, other studies have highlighted the relationship between disease severity and dendritic cell properties, both quantitative and qualitative. This, however, for some reason does not affect other cytokines and chemokines, produced by DCs (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-7, IL-12 (p35 and p40), IL-15, IL-18, TNF-α, TGF-β, macrophage CSF, and granulocyte-macrophage CSF, but not IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IFN-γ transcripts) [
53]. In our studies, some of these cytokines showed a typical pro-inflammatory profile and an actual increase in concentrations [
10,
11,
12]. Other studies exploring the role of DCs in coronavirus infections highlight their participation in viral dissemination [
54]. Notably, not only in SARS-CoV-2 associated diseases, but also in SARS and MERS [
55], DCs are named ‘the missing link’ between antiviral innate and adaptive responses. As SARS-CoV-2 induces activation of specific plasmacytoid IFN-producing cells (pDCs) [
56], it may be possible that this subpopulation of DCs displaces conventional DCs (cDCs) and monocyte-derived DCs (MoDCs) [
57,
58]. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells are characterized by CD123+CD303+ phenotype, their main role is enabling type I IFN expression. Moreover, the severity of the disease correlates with the responsiveness of pDCs [
59]. Although there is little information on pDCs ability to produce MDC/CCL22, there is a possibility that it is not as prominent as in other types of dendritic cells (e.g., MoDCs). If this assumption is correct and pDCs production of MDC/CCL22 is in any way impaired, this may explain differences in chemokine production associated with the coronavirus infection.
Theoretically, this phenomenon may explain a defect in MDC/CCL22 production and its deficiency in the blood plasma of COVID-19 patients in comparison with healthy donors. While the precise mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 suppresses DC function and MDC/CCL22 production are not yet fully understood, the deficiency of MDC/CCL22 in the blood plasma of COVID-19 patients compared to healthy donors suggests that this chemokine may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the complex interactions between SARS-CoV-2, DCs, and MDC/CCL22, with the ultimate goal of developing new therapeutic strategies to combat COVID-19 and other infectious diseases.
In any case, both hypotheses prove the role of the SARS-CoV-2 infectious process in the suppression of DCs. Potential mechanisms for inflammatory dysfunction in patients with lower MDC/CCL22 are presented in
Figure 5.