You are currently viewing a beta version of our website. If you spot anything unusual, kindly let us know.
Altmetrics
Downloads
161
Views
27
Comments
0
A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.
This version is not peer-reviewed
Cylindrical Conventional梅Group 1a 梅(sample number) | ISQ ( mean for each implant) | IT (Ncm) | RT (Ncm) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 49.5 | 20 | 10 |
2 | 51.5 | 15 | 10 |
3 | 54 | 30 | 20 |
4 | 50.5 | 15 | 5 |
5 | 46 | 10 | 5 |
6 | 49.5 | 20 | 10 |
7 | 44 | 10 | 5 |
8 | 44.5 | 15 | 5 |
9 | 46 | 15 | 5 |
10 | 50 | 15 | 10 |
Cylindrical OD梅Group 1b梅(sample number) | ISQ (mean value for each implant) | IT (Ncm) | RT (Ncm) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 45.5 | 15 | 10 |
2 | 55 | 40 | 40 |
3 | 55.5 | 45 | 40 |
4 | 50 | 25 | 25 |
5 | 51 | 10 | 5 |
6 | 50.5 | 30 | 25 |
7 | 52 | 30 | 20 |
8 | 48.5 | 20 | 15 |
9 | 49 | 15 | 10 |
10 | 51 | 30 | 25 |
Conical Conventional梅Group 2a梅(sample number) | ISQ (mean value for each implant) | IT (Ncm) | RT (Ncm) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 50 | 15 | 10 |
2 | 50 | 20 | 15 |
3 | 51 | 10 | 5 |
4 | 56.5 | 15 | 10 |
5 | 55.5 | 30 | 25 |
6 | 56 | 30 | 20 |
7 | 50.5 | 10 | 5 |
8 | 54.5 | 45 | 40 |
9 | 54.5 | 40 | 30 |
10 | 53 | 30 | 25 |
Conical OD梅Group 2b梅(sample number) | ISQ (mean value for each implant) | IT (Ncm) | RT (Ncm) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 53.5 | 20 | 15 |
2 | 54.5 | 15 | 10 |
3 | 57.5 | 30 | 25 |
4 | 52 | 20 | 20 |
5 | 54 | 25 | 20 |
6 | 54.5 | 30 | 35 |
7 | 51.5 | 20 | 15 |
8 | 55.5 | 40 | 45 |
9 | 58.5 | 45 | 50 |
10 | 61.5 | 60 | 65 |
Parameter | Group | Mean ± SD | Median ± IQR | Minimum | Maximum | ANOVA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P-Value | |||||||
ISQ | 1a | Cylindrical conventional | 48.6 ± 3.3 | 49.5 ± 4.4 | 44.0 | 54.0 | 0.0001 |
1b | Cylindrical OD | 50.8 ± 3.0 | 50.8 ± 2.5 | 45.5 | 55.5 | ||
2a | Conical conventional | 53.2 ± 2.6 | 53.8 ± 4.6 | 50.0 | 56.5 | ||
2b | Conical OD | 55.3 ± 3.1 | 54.5 ± 3.5 | 51.5 | 61.5 | ||
IT | 1a | Cylindrical conventional | 16.5 ± 5.8 | 15.0 ± 3.8 | 10.0 | 30.0 | 0.0619 |
1b | Cylindrical OD | 26.0 ± 11.3 | 27.5 ± 13.8 | 10.0 | 45.0 | ||
2a | Conical conventional | 24.5 ± 12.4 | 25.0 ± 15.0 | 10.0 | 45.0 | ||
2b | Conical OD | 30.5 ± 14.0 | 27.5 ± 17.5 | 15.0 | 60.0 | ||
RT | 1a | Cylindrical conventional | 8.5 ± 4.7 | 7.5 ± 5.0 | 5.0 | 20.0 | 0.0017 |
1b | Cylindrical OD | 21.5 ± 12.0 | 22.5 ± 13.8 | 5.0 | 40.0 | ||
2a | Conical conventional | 18.5 ± 11.6 | 17.5 ± 15.0 | 5.0 | 40.0 | ||
2b | Conical OD | 30.0 ± 18.1 | 22.5 ± 26.3 | 10.0 | 65.0 |
Comparison | ISQ* | IT* | RT** | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean Diff. | P_Value | Mean Diff. | P_Value | Mean Diff. | P_Value | |||
1a vs 2a | -4.6 | 0.008 | -8.0 | 0.400 | -10.0 | 0.105 | ||
1a vs 1b | -2.3 | 0.346 | -9.5 | 0.254 | -13.0 | 0.035 | ||
1a vs 2b | -6.8 | 0.000 | -14.0 | 0.062 | -21.5 | 0.019 | ||
2a vs 1b | -2.4 | 0.309 | 1.5 | 0.991 | 3.0 | 0.940 | ||
2a vs 2b | -2.2 | 0.378 | -6.0 | 0.638 | -11.5 | 0.360 | ||
1b vs 2b | -4.5 | 0.009 | -4.5 | 0.809 | -8.5 | 0.614 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Submitted:
05 May 2023
Posted:
09 May 2023
You are already at the latest version
A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.
This version is not peer-reviewed
Submitted:
05 May 2023
Posted:
09 May 2023
You are already at the latest version
Cylindrical Conventional梅Group 1a 梅(sample number) | ISQ ( mean for each implant) | IT (Ncm) | RT (Ncm) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 49.5 | 20 | 10 |
2 | 51.5 | 15 | 10 |
3 | 54 | 30 | 20 |
4 | 50.5 | 15 | 5 |
5 | 46 | 10 | 5 |
6 | 49.5 | 20 | 10 |
7 | 44 | 10 | 5 |
8 | 44.5 | 15 | 5 |
9 | 46 | 15 | 5 |
10 | 50 | 15 | 10 |
Cylindrical OD梅Group 1b梅(sample number) | ISQ (mean value for each implant) | IT (Ncm) | RT (Ncm) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 45.5 | 15 | 10 |
2 | 55 | 40 | 40 |
3 | 55.5 | 45 | 40 |
4 | 50 | 25 | 25 |
5 | 51 | 10 | 5 |
6 | 50.5 | 30 | 25 |
7 | 52 | 30 | 20 |
8 | 48.5 | 20 | 15 |
9 | 49 | 15 | 10 |
10 | 51 | 30 | 25 |
Conical Conventional梅Group 2a梅(sample number) | ISQ (mean value for each implant) | IT (Ncm) | RT (Ncm) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 50 | 15 | 10 |
2 | 50 | 20 | 15 |
3 | 51 | 10 | 5 |
4 | 56.5 | 15 | 10 |
5 | 55.5 | 30 | 25 |
6 | 56 | 30 | 20 |
7 | 50.5 | 10 | 5 |
8 | 54.5 | 45 | 40 |
9 | 54.5 | 40 | 30 |
10 | 53 | 30 | 25 |
Conical OD梅Group 2b梅(sample number) | ISQ (mean value for each implant) | IT (Ncm) | RT (Ncm) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 53.5 | 20 | 15 |
2 | 54.5 | 15 | 10 |
3 | 57.5 | 30 | 25 |
4 | 52 | 20 | 20 |
5 | 54 | 25 | 20 |
6 | 54.5 | 30 | 35 |
7 | 51.5 | 20 | 15 |
8 | 55.5 | 40 | 45 |
9 | 58.5 | 45 | 50 |
10 | 61.5 | 60 | 65 |
Parameter | Group | Mean ± SD | Median ± IQR | Minimum | Maximum | ANOVA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P-Value | |||||||
ISQ | 1a | Cylindrical conventional | 48.6 ± 3.3 | 49.5 ± 4.4 | 44.0 | 54.0 | 0.0001 |
1b | Cylindrical OD | 50.8 ± 3.0 | 50.8 ± 2.5 | 45.5 | 55.5 | ||
2a | Conical conventional | 53.2 ± 2.6 | 53.8 ± 4.6 | 50.0 | 56.5 | ||
2b | Conical OD | 55.3 ± 3.1 | 54.5 ± 3.5 | 51.5 | 61.5 | ||
IT | 1a | Cylindrical conventional | 16.5 ± 5.8 | 15.0 ± 3.8 | 10.0 | 30.0 | 0.0619 |
1b | Cylindrical OD | 26.0 ± 11.3 | 27.5 ± 13.8 | 10.0 | 45.0 | ||
2a | Conical conventional | 24.5 ± 12.4 | 25.0 ± 15.0 | 10.0 | 45.0 | ||
2b | Conical OD | 30.5 ± 14.0 | 27.5 ± 17.5 | 15.0 | 60.0 | ||
RT | 1a | Cylindrical conventional | 8.5 ± 4.7 | 7.5 ± 5.0 | 5.0 | 20.0 | 0.0017 |
1b | Cylindrical OD | 21.5 ± 12.0 | 22.5 ± 13.8 | 5.0 | 40.0 | ||
2a | Conical conventional | 18.5 ± 11.6 | 17.5 ± 15.0 | 5.0 | 40.0 | ||
2b | Conical OD | 30.0 ± 18.1 | 22.5 ± 26.3 | 10.0 | 65.0 |
Comparison | ISQ* | IT* | RT** | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean Diff. | P_Value | Mean Diff. | P_Value | Mean Diff. | P_Value | |||
1a vs 2a | -4.6 | 0.008 | -8.0 | 0.400 | -10.0 | 0.105 | ||
1a vs 1b | -2.3 | 0.346 | -9.5 | 0.254 | -13.0 | 0.035 | ||
1a vs 2b | -6.8 | 0.000 | -14.0 | 0.062 | -21.5 | 0.019 | ||
2a vs 1b | -2.4 | 0.309 | 1.5 | 0.991 | 3.0 | 0.940 | ||
2a vs 2b | -2.2 | 0.378 | -6.0 | 0.638 | -11.5 | 0.360 | ||
1b vs 2b | -4.5 | 0.009 | -4.5 | 0.809 | -8.5 | 0.614 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Alessandro Antonelli
et al.
Applied Sciences,
2020
Rafael Mello-Machado
et al.
Applied Sciences,
2021
Amanda de Carvalho Silva Leocádio
et al.
Materials,
2020
© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated