3. Discussion
The central findings of the present study are that chronic administration of rostafuroxin – which was initially described as an antihypertensive drug with an inhibitory effect on the (Na
++K
+)ATPase from the kidney medulla of hypertensive rats [
2] – modulates blood pressure, food/energy intake, protein metabolism, body Na
+ handling, fluid balance and the Na
+-transporting ATPases resident in renal proximal tubule cells of male rats, in a way that depends on the nutritional status.
We induced chronic undernutrition from weaning until a rat juvenile age [
18] by offering ad libitum a multideficient diet, RBD, which mimics those widely used in countries and regions where undernutrition is endemic [
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15]. The content of proteins is very low (
Table 1), and their quality is poor because their sources are beans and jerked beef. Additionally, vitamins supplementation also does not exist. These are the reasons by which the rats body mass has markedly decreased (
Figure 1), and compensatory mechanisms, likely involving neuronal circuits in the central nervous system [
21,
22,
23] culminated with increased food and energy intake (
Figure 2A,B). This neuronal network appears to be activated by rostafuroxin, and the stimulatory effect could involve steps in which the (Na
++K
+)ATPase participates [
24,
25] being modulated by endogenous ouabain in association with tissular Na
+ levels [
3,
26].
At this point, it is relevant to note that rostafuroxin-treated CTRL and RBD rats consume a significantly higher amount of Na
+ (
Figure 3A) and, since there was an accentuated lower [Na
+]
pls in the undernourished group (minus ~20 mequiv/l) (
Figure 6), it could be postulated that higher Na
+ is present – in a greater amount in RBD rats – in silent non-osmotic tissular compartments, which have been hypothesized some years ago [
27,
28] and recently revisited [
29]. The results found in rats given rostafuroxin are compatible with the mobilization of Na
+ from these deposits by the drug in a more accentuated way in RBD rats.
Somewhat different results regarding the potential effects of endogenous ouabain on body mass, food intake, and Na
+ intake were reported more than two decades ago [
30,
31,
32]. The chronic infusion of ouabain in rats increased body mass and had no effect on food or Na
+ ingestion [
30]; however, these observations can be explained because ouabain of external origin and endogenous ouabain seems not to be the same compounds or, in other words, that endogenous digitalis did not represent authentic ouabain [
31,
32]. Additionally, rostafuroxin could activate other structures beyond the central nervous system, e.g., the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which stimulates the secretion of glucocorticoids that augment appetite and food intake [
33,
34]. Other novel metabolic effects of rostafuroxin reported in the present study are those encountered in [albumin]
pls: decrease in RBD rats without influence in the CTRL group (
Figure 2C). It could be that the drug's effect on liver protein metabolism depends on the upregulation of the AMP kinase-mediated cellular energy metabolism sensing in the liver, an organ in which AMP kinase plays a central regulatory role [
35,
36].
The antihypertensive effect of rostafuroxin was described as not associated with diuretic effects, despite its accentuated natriuretic action [
2,
37] and has not the usual side effects of diuretics in humans, as demonstrated in clinical trials [
38]. We investigated whether rostafuroxin modified water balance in rats as the result of induced modifications in water intake and urinary volume and if – as in the case of food/energy intake – there was an influence of the nutrition status. The increased ingestion of water by RBD rats when compared to CTRL animals (
Figure 3B) possibly represents a regulatory response facing the high ingestion of food (solutes) (
Figure 2A). In contrast with that found in the case of food/energy intake, however, no rostafuroxin-induced polydipsia was found in both groups of animals, a result suggesting that hypothalamic circuits at the forebrain [
39] which control thirst, have not (Na
++K
+)ATPase as central signaling machinery, even though the intravenous injection of ouabain decreases water intake in rats [
40].
When the urinary volume in 24 h is examined, one can demonstrate that rostafuroxin had an evident diuretic influence only in RBD but not in CTRL rats (
Figure 4A). This observation allows us to conclude that, again, the nutritional status of the animals influences one important effect of endogenous ouabain. Since the pioneering studies mentioned above were carried out with normonourished rats [
2,
37], the lack of diuretic action may only occur in properly nourished animals. This idea receives support from the observation that neither urinary volume nor water intake was modified by rostafuroxin administration in CTRL rats (
Figure 3B and
Figure 4A). The diuretic effect of rostafuroxin in RBD rats led to the normalization of water balance to CTRL levels (
Figure 5B); only the untreated RBD continued with a positive water balance (
Figure 5B), possibly as the result of the presence of elevated levels of circulating endogenous ouabain, which has been implicated in water retention [
30].
Rostafuroxin-induced natriuresis was one of the more noticeable effects described early [
2,
37]. This action was attributed to a counteracting influence on circulating endogenous ouabain on renal (Na
++K
+)ATPase, principally that localized in the external medulla [
2], because of the role of the (Na
++K
+)ATPase resident in the basolateral membranes of the thick ascending segment of Henle loop in the final control of Na
+ excretion in physiological and pathological conditions [
41]. This picture was confirmed in the case of CTRL rats, which presented with increased [Na
+]
ur and Na
+ excretion in 24 h when submitted to a chronic administration of rostafuroxin. However, a contrasting effect was encountered in RBD rats: their diminished [Na
+]
ur and Na
+ excretion in 24 h was further decreased by rostafuroxin (
Figure 4B,C). As proposed above, the undernourished rats may present with augmented endogenous ouabain production in the central nervous system that could cause increased nerve renal activity, thus eliciting an antinatriuretic response [
42]. In this condition, abnormal activation of the renal nerve could be the underlying basis of the opposite, strong antinatriuretic influence of rostafuroxin, which actions are dose-dependent and also dependent on the ouabain levels when this drug is infused [
43].
The results regarding [Na
+]
ur and Na
+ excretion in 24 h presented in
Figure 4B,C reverberate in the bodily Na
+ balance depicted in
Figure 5A where, in which, as expected, the influence of nutritional status clearly appears. The untreated CTRL rats had an overall Na
+ balance that approached zero, as usually occurs with part of the rat population hosted in metabolic cages for a short period [
44]. When rostafuroxin was given to these animals, a significantly negative daily balance (~0.6 mequiv Na
+ per 100 g BM in 24 h) was found, despite the unmodified Na
+ intake (
Figure 3A). This trend also suggests that rostafuroxin mobilizes the ion from a so-called non-osmotically active “spooky” compartment [
45], transiently passing through a plasma compartment slightly concentrated with Na
+ as seen in
Figure 6. If we apply this reasoning to RBD rats, the daily positive balance means a cumulative Na
+ storage along the experimental period of the assay (62 days). This positive balance doubled in the rats that received rostafuroxin, likely due to an abnormal renal response to the drug in a condition of probably elevated endogenous ouabain, mimicking the experimental antinatriuretic conditions established by Lim et al. [
42].
In a recent study [
17] and here (
Figure 7A,B) we demonstrated that chronic undernutrition provoked by the continued administration of RBD to male rats downregulates the ouabain-sensitive (Na
++K
+)ATPase and upregulates the ouabain-resistant Na
+-ATPase, the two Na+-transporting ATPases that are responsible for the proximal renal reabsorption of more than 70% of the Na
+ filtered in the glomeruli [
46,
47]. Even though the hydrolytic activity of (Na
++K
+)ATPase in membrane preparations does not quantitatively reflect the transport stoichiometry in intact cells, it is possible to propose that less bulk Na
+ is reabsorbed in these tubules in undernourished rats because the lower transport demand in lower-sized animals. Conversely, upregulation of the one order of magnitude lower ouabain-resistant ATPase means that the fine-tuned Na
+ reabsorption across the proximal epithelium mediated by this enzyme is increased, possibly contributing to the progressive genesis of arterial hypertension [
48]. Concerning rostafuroxin, the influence of the drug on (Na
++K
+)ATPase (
Figure 7A) matches the Na
+ balance in CTRL rats, and also that effect of the drug on the medullary (Na
++K
+)ATPase [
2]. In the case of RBD rats, there is a total dissociation between Na
+ balance and (Na
++K
+)ATPase in both untreated and untreated animals (compare
Figure 5A and
Figure 7A). The results with undernourished rats are compatible with the idea that migration of the (Na
++K
+)ATPase from the membrane and abnormal anchoring to cytoskeletal proteins has occurred, thus downregulating this pump [
32]. The opposite is true when we look at the ouabain-resistant Na
+-ATPase (
Figure 7B), which its influence on the Na
+ balance – despite its importance in body Na
+ handling – is not evident due to its lower activity (compare ordinates in
Figure 7A,B).
Finally, one last question deserves discussion: is there any diet-modulated effect of rostafuroxin on the systolic blood pressure encountered in undernourished rats?
Figure 8 shows that the drug completely normalized the arterial pressure in the RBD group without influence in CTRL rats and these facts could be discussed on the basis of three ideas: (i) the structural and functional undernutrition-induced abnormalities proposed to occur in renal tissue on the basis of the Lim et al. [
42] hypothesis above discussed – which alter the responses of the two Na
+-transporting ATPases to rostafuroxin (
Figure 7A,B) – are not present in arteries such as thoracic aorta and mesenteric arteries; (ii) rostafuroxin seems to act on these vessels only when a “pro hypertensive environment” has developed [
49] such as described in hypertensive rats [2,49,50, and this study]; (iii) removal of silent Na
+ promoted by rostafuroxin from the water-free stores represented by glycosaminoglycans from the endothelial surface and from the perivascular interstitium [
51,
52] could also underpin the antihypertensive effect of rostafuroxin in undernourished rats.
In one type of spontaneously hypertensive rats with high levels of endogenous ouabain, rostafuroxin did not interact with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) [
2] and, therefore, the antihypertensive actions of the drug seem not to antagonize RAAS to prevent the genesis of hypertension. In the case of RBD undernourished rats, the cortical renal tubulointerstitium has more than four times the number of angiotensin II-positive cells found in CTRL rats [
53], evidence of an increased tissular RAAS activity. Moreover, rostafuroxin-sensitive hypertension they develop (
Figure 8) is also completely normalized by the administration of losartan, an antagonist of type 1 angiotensin II receptors [
17]. In terms of vascular actions in vessels (such as the thoracic aorta and mesenteric arteries), rostafuroxin appears to have opposite effects and the same final targets as RAAS. It has been proposed that endogenous ouabain is regulated by type 2 angiotensin II receptors [
3,
54,
55] which initiate the branch of RAAS that antagonizes the type 1 angiotensin II pathway [
56]. Thus, the cross-talk between rostafuroxin-associated signaling pathways and RAAS deserves further studies.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.P-A., J.P.V-S, H.M-F., and A.V.; methodology, A.P-A., J.P.M.V-S; D.A.B., G.C-S., H.M.F., an A.V.; validation, A.P-A., J.P.M.V-S., D.A-B., G-C-S., H.M.F., and A.V.; formal analysis, A.P-A., J.P.M.V-S.,H.M-F., and A.V.; investigation, A.P-A., J.P.M.V-S., D.A-B., G-C-S., H. M-F., and A.V.; resources, A.P-A., J.P.M.V-S., D.A-B., G-C-S., H. M-F., and A.V.; data curation, A.P-A., J.P.M.V-S., H. M-F., and A.V.; writing—original draft preparation, A.P-A, J.P.M V-S., H.M-F, and A.V.; writing—review and editing, A.P-A., J.P.M.V-S., D.A-B., G-C-S., H. M-F., and A.V.; visualization, A.P-A., J.P.M.V-S., D.A-B., G-C-S., H. M-F., and A.V.; supervision, A.P-A., and A.V.; project administration, A.PA., and A.V.; funding acquisition, A.P-A., H.M-F., and A.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.