Preprint
Article

Assessment of Influencing Factors on Consumer Behavior using the AHP Model

Altmetrics

Downloads

253

Views

146

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

19 May 2023

Posted:

31 May 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
The influence of numerous factors determines and changes the daily behavior of consumers. This paper aims to estimate and rank the weight of cultural, social, personal, and psychological factors that change the buying habits of individuals. The research was conducted on a sample of 559 re-spondents. Data from the survey were used to create a hierarchical model structure. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a decision-making method was used in the analysis to estimate and rank the factors that influence consumer habits. An analysis of results showed that the personal and psychological factors have the principal influence on consumer habits. Personal budget, as the dominant criterion in a group of set criteria, contributed to the fact that the personal factors have the dominant influence on consumer habits. The work showed that the choice of the method used is relevant to the results and that the analysis of the impact on consumer habits can be expanded by including several factors.
Keywords: 
Subject: Business, Economics and Management  -   Marketing

1. Introduction

Today, we are living a time of great changes. The COVID-19 pandemic, wars, natural disasters, technological developments, and financial crises have changed the whole world and the way of thinking. Consumption gradually becomes a very important part of ensuring an individual’s happiness [1]. Consumer habits are changing each day due to a complex interplay of technological, economic, social, cultural, environmental, and health and safety factors. Businesses that understand these factors and adapt to changing consumer habits are more likely to succeed and thrive in the long run. Research on consumer behavior is essential for developing effective marketing strategies, increasing business performance, informing public policy, advancing consumer welfare, and academic advancements. By understanding consumer behavior, businesses and policymakers can make informed decisions that can improve the lives of consumers and promote economic growth.
With the development of technology, the evolution of individual awareness, and societal changes, the nature of consumer behavior becomes different, which complicates marketing planning [2]. Perception varies from individual to individual and not all consumers have the same attitudes about the same product, therefore they behave differently. [3]. Consumers appreciate the social responsibility of companies in terms of sustainable development [4].
Consumer habits are greatly influenced by internal and external factors. Internal factors comprise of economic conditions and psychological factors while external ones comprise of social and cultural factors. [5]. The consumer habits are subject to constant environmental influences. There are daily influences of family, friends, the Internet, social networks, famous public life personalities, and the media on purchase decision-making. Even small things affect the consumer perception, ranging from the way of buying and delivering products, to insurance and complaints, after-sales services, and everything that can be classified in the category of marketing mix (product, price, distribution, and promotion).
While it is difficult to predict exactly how consumers will behave in all situations, research on consumer behavior can provide insights into their decision-making processes, needs, and motivations. The lifestyle, habits, trends, wishes, and needs of consumers are changing daily, while consumer behavior is often unpredictable. Marketers needs to study consumer behavior constantly to meet the needs of consumers while ensuring mutual satisfaction. It is important to note that not all consumers are the same, and individual differences can impact their behavior.
This study is a continuation of an existing consumer behavior research of Šostar, et. al. [6] where the focus on factors influencing consumer behavior has been expanded to include other areas of influence. This research has shown the significant influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on consumer attitudes as an important psychological factor. With this expanded study, the sample size over which the research is conducted has increased, and the impact of all factors (social, cultural, personal, and psychological) has been analyzed. This paper analyzes the scientific literature examining factors influencing consumer behavior. The aim of the paper is to determine whether all the factors affect consumer behavior equally or whether some of them have more dominant influence. The source of the data is secondary research as well as primary research conducted in Republic of Croatia (survey of consumers using a sample as well as the Analytic Hierarchy Process - AHP method) applied to determine the mentioned impacts.
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method has proven to be an excellent tool for managers. This method applies to all management activities. It helps managers in decision-making. A decision is a problem-solving process that does not have to be focused only on deciding, but the point is that the problem must be solved. Performance of tasks and problem-solving in business are management challenges. Therefore, it is relevant to consider the circumstances and factors that affect the business process. The impact of individual factors cannot always be predicted. Such elements have a stochastic character and require more complex decision-making processes. Therefore, we will use the AHP method to analyze the impact on consumer habits. The implementation of the AHP model is carried out through a clear hierarchical structure: (1) the problem is defined and analyzed, (2) possible solution variants are proposed, and (3) one variant is selected according to specific criteria [7]. Such an approach will allow us to evaluate factors according to the degree of influence on consumer habits. Also, managers will have the opportunity to manage consumer habits by relying on the ranking of factors that influence the consumer habits. In this study, we first want to rank the variants of influence on consumer habits and then choose the best variant, based on the set criteria, using the AHP method. The data used will be taken from a sample of 559 surveys.
This paper is organized as follows: Section 1 introduces theoretical framework of consumer behavior and the proposed approach to select right consumer behavior influencing factors. It also provides hypotheses and the analytic hierarchy process as a multicriteria decision-making method. Section 2 presents materials and methods used in research process. Section 3 presents results and a discussion. Section 4 discusses the conclusions.

1.1. Problem Statement

This study aims to determine how consumers in Republic of Croatia behave in the market due to internal and external factors. There is existing research on these influences, but most of them are not sufficiently focused on the challenges of modern times, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine, natural disasters, and the like. This study aims to cover proposed influential factors, determining how much and in what way they affect consumer behavior in Republic of Croatia.

1.2. Significance of the Study

Consumer behavior is the study of how individuals or groups select, buy, use, and dispose of products, services, ideas, or experiences to satisfy their needs and wants. It is a crucial aspect of marketing as understanding consumer behavior can help organizations create effective marketing strategies and make informed business decisions.
Research on influential factors on consumer behavior is essential because it helps businesses to identify and understand the various factors that affect consumer decision-making processes. By understanding the factors that influence consumer behavior, organizations can better design their products and services, develop targeted marketing campaigns, and tailor their customer experiences to meet the needs and preferences of their target audience.
The contribution of this research is in the development of the product itself, crafting better marketing strategies and approaches to the consumer, creating a stronger connection with consumers, and creating a competitive advantage. This research will assist companies in better understanding the needs of their customers and organizations in developing more effective communication and sales channels.
The COVID-19 pandemic, war in Ukraine and many other influences have had a significant impact on consumer behavior. Both events have changed the foundations of functioning people and economies, leading to changes in buying habits. The primary benefit of this study is to determine the impacts of modern age to consumer behavior. There are numerous studies on the influential factors on consumer behavior, but most of the research was conducted before or during the COVID-19 pandemic and war in Ukraine. These events have significantly changed consumer attitudes and behavior, making this research important in understanding the changes that have occurred.
Finally, research on influential factors on consumer behavior is crucial for businesses to make informed decisions about product development, marketing, and customer experience. It helps organizations to identify the needs and preferences of their customers, develop effective marketing strategies, and ultimately improve sales and revenue.

1.3. Literature Review

Communication in everyday life, including in sales, is the key to satisfaction and success. Communication can be verbal or non-verbal. Non-verbal communication has a significant impact on the success of any business. It ranges from the behavior towards employees, partners, and co-workers to the relationship with potential customers buying a particular product or service [8].
Consumer behavior demonstrates how individuals, groups, and organizations behave, how they buy goods and services, and how this satisfies their desires and needs. [9]. “We can also define it as the behavior that consumers exhibit when searching for, purchasing, evaluating, and disposing of products that to some extent meet their needs”. [10].
The market where customers appear can be divided into individuals and households who purchase products and services for personal consumption. The business entity market purchases goods and services for further processing, refinement, and sale [11].
Consumer behavior affects individual behavior in the process of procuring, using, and disposing of products. Every day, consumers make a series of decisions regarding the aforementioned processes, often unconsciously, so that the process is interactive and most often routine [6].
Consumer behavior is the key to success. As the Pareto principle states that 20% of customers contribute to 80% of sales, the goal is to retain the existing customers. Finding new markets and new customers is an expensive and long-lasting process. To satisfy consumers and create long-term purchases, marketers must invest considerable efforts in the market research and product development. According to Solomon, et. al. [12], customer satisfaction is measurement of experience of the consumer after purchasing products or using the services. Research of Fruth, et. al. [13] point out that some consumers rely on their own knowledge and experience to make quick buying decisions, but others may need more information and involvement. Therefore, the level of involvement reflects the consumer interest and use of a given product, but also the amount of information they need to decide. Consumers often behave unpredictably, and consumer behavior may differ from person to person, even though we are talking about the same product. For this reason, it is necessary to do consumer and market segmentation to research, in the most efficient way, what a particular group of consumers needs and how to offer them what they need.
Figure 1 shows a model of consumer behavior where it can be seen that under the influence of the 4 Ps (product, price, distribution, and promotion), as well as other influential factors, there is a change in consumer behavior and, in the end, a decision about purchasing is made. In their research, Schiffman, et. al. indicated that characteristics of the consumer have impact on how he or she reacts to the stimulants, the consumer decision-making process itself affects the consumers behavior, as shown in the model of buyer behavior as marketing and other stimulants entering the consumer’s black box and producing certain responses. [14].
“The term consumer buying behavior refers to consumers’ attitudes, preferences, intentions, and choices when purchasing products or services. This behavior is related to consumers behavior in the market. Purchase decisions are influenced by many factors including personal, psychological, and social factors” [15].
Figure 2 shows that the influences affecting consumers may be arranged into groups as cultural, social, personal, and psychological factors. Marketers cannot control these factors for the most part, but they must take them into account [16].
Cultural differences play an important role in consumer behavior. Culture is an essential part of every person and determines what they are like, what values and habits they have in life. Culture varies from country to country and geographic area. When that region is large enough, then companies devise specialized marketing approaches in communicating with consumers. [17]. A key finding of Al Ghaswyneh, et. al. [1] shows that consumer behavior due to cultural identity can have an exceptionally strong and positive impact on creating a connection with a product that is adapted to these cultural differences.
“Reference groups are considered a social influence in consumer purchasing because they are often groups that consumers will look up to while making purchasing decisions” [18]. Reference groups are those that have a direct or indirect influence on consumers’ buying habits. Groups that have a direct impact relate to those in which someone is a member or to which they belong, such as family and friends, while the indirect ones are those we either want or do not want to belong to [17]. Opinion leaders are people whose advice and suggestions are respected by consumers and the consumers come under influence of the opinion leaders when deciding to buy a product. These are most often well-known figures from public life. “Social factors depend on income, social class, and education level. Consumer buying behavior is the selection, purchase and consumption of goods and services for the satisfaction of their wants” [5]. Family and status symbols play a significant role in consumer behavior. Another research from Danish, et. al. [19] suggest that consumers don’t buy eco-friendly products just for functionality but also for their symbolism and acceptance of the product in society. Consumers are satisfied when they buy green products that reduce negative impacts on the environment.
Personal factors will also be influenced by other factors such as age, gender, background, culture, and personal issues in the course of the decision-making process concerning online purchases [20]. Personal factors that influence consumer behavior are one’s age, life cycle stage, occupation, economic circumstances, personality, lifestyle, and value system. Any reduction or increase of one’s personal budget, inflation, or job loss are of big importance here. The study of Liu, et. al. [21] shows that “demand motivation, the anchor, the product message, the live medium, and consumer attitudes are the main factors that affect the depth of consumers’ engagement and purchase behaviors”.
“Psychological considerations include understanding of needs or circumstances, capacity of a person to absorb or interpret knowledge, as well as the person’s mood. This is when a consumer reacts to the marketing adversity available around him or her based on personal impressions about specific goods or services” [22]. Among the psychological factors, perception is extremely important, while other psychological factors are motives and motivation, learning, personality traits, memory, and knowledge. It is necessary to mention pandemics, wars, natural disasters, social networks, and media as psychological influences that are always associated with similar or the same consumer behavior patterns over time. “Emotional marketing comes from the emotional needs of consumers; it can induce an emotional resonance in consumers and integrate emotions into marketing. In the era of emotional consumption, consumers not only care about the quantity, quality and price of products, but also need emotional satisfaction and psychological identification when shopping” [23].
In their study, Nawi, et. al. [24] conclude that respondents are influenced to make an online purchase when the researchers realize that the most influential factor of habitual behavior is the desire to find a particular product useful, and actual buying habits highly influence intention towards making an online purchase. Research of Al-Ghaswyneh [1] analyzed the perception of prices, rewards, social network posts, and online reviews as consumer behavior influences, where they proved that rewards have the greatest influence on purchases. Studies conducted by Chowhury, et. al; Khaniwale, et. al.; Lai, et. al.; Sangroya, et.al. [25,26,27,28] on consumer buying behavior in less developed economies show that consumers are always considering price, religious orientation, and culture in the context of their buying behavior.
Studies of Al-Salamin, et. al.; Aschemann-Witzel, et. al.; Waheed, et. al. [29,30,31] have demonstrated the effect of prices on consumer behavior, where consumers were in a position to bargain for a price and decide on which product to buy considering the price and quality of the product. Svatosova [32] stated in her research that consumers are mostly facing challenges which will affect them emotionally and psychologically. Bezzaoua, et. al. [8] found out in their study that there was no relationship between perceived cultures and concrete personality traits. The study conducted by Kwajaffa [34] confirms that there are positive and significant relationships between one’s motivation and consumer buying behavior, between prices and consumer behavior, and between one’s perceived cultural importance and consumer buying behavior. Also, there are positive and significant relationships between one’s perceived cultural importance and religious orientation, and between prices and one’s religious orientation.
In their research, Al-Ghaswyneh; Lawan, et. al.; Nawawi, et. al. [1,35,36] indicated that cultural factors have a significant effect on one’s buying decision. The study of Etuk, et. al. [37] indicates that that family, reference groups, and culture have a significant positive influence on the decision-making process regarding purchases.
Sonwaney, et. al. [38], in their research explains “that aimed to discover the elements that influence online customer purchasing behavior, they concluded that psychological and demographic characteristics have a major influence on consumer purchasing choices”. Research of Šostar, et. al.; Zwanka, et. al. [8,39] “investigated the potential impact of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic on global consumer traits, buying patterns, global interconnectedness and psychographic behavior, and other marketing activities and finally their paper found long term behavioral shifts due to the COVID-19 pandemic which resulted in shifts in consumer behavior”. In their study Hall, et. al. [40] illustrate that different countries and regions have similar behavior in terms of panic buying during the COVID 19 pandemic. The influence of a product’s brand and trust in it is associated with ethical behavior. [41].
Findings of Etuk, et. al. [37] indicated that the most significant influence on consumer buying behavior in Egypt came from the personal factors while, the culture was the least influential factor. In Saudi Arabia, the economic factor was the most significant factor of consumer buying behavior and the culture was the least influential factor. Research of Ayaviri-Nina, et. al. [42] “reveals that emotions, feelings, and motivation are the factors that are significantly related to consumer attitudes toward purchases”. The study of Victor, et. al. [43] “confirms that, when consumers purchase durable items, personal characteristics such as their age, employment, economic position, lifestyle, and personality have a substantial impact on their purchasing decisions”.

1.4. Research objectives and hypothesis

Research objective of this study is to determine the impact of consumer behavior influencing factors. The challenge (existing problem) is that it is very difficult to monitor consumer behavior, which is highly unpredictable due to internal and external influences. We determine four (4) main impacts that influence consumer behavior: cultural factors, social factors, personal factors, and psychological factors.
In this study, we set up hypotheses to test whether all the factors influencing consumer behavior have an equal impact or whether some of them dominate. For this purpose, three hypotheses were tested: H1: All factors equally affect consumer behavior, H2: Personal factors dominantly affect consumer behavior, and H3: An individual’s income plays a key role in purchasing habits.

2. Materials and Methods

The methodology of research is crucial because it provides a systematic and structured approach to investigating a research question or hypothesis. A well-designed methodology ensures that the research is conducted in a rigorous, systematic, and objective manner, increasing the validity and reliability of the results. By providing a structured framework for data analysis, facilitating replication and peer review, and enhancing the generalizability and relevance of the research, a well-designed methodology supports the advancement of knowledge and understanding in the field of consumer behavior.
The methodology used in this research refers to the collection of primary and secondary data. The secondary data was collected through an analysis of existing relevant literature (scientific studies, scientific papers, books/textbooks, analyses, and statistical data). A questionnaire survey was also conducted as a research method and responses were statistically processed later. The obtained data were used in the analysis using the AHP method. In the paper, artificial intelligence was used to a small extent as one of the tools to achieve higher quality of the work.
The questionnaire survey was conducted on a sample of 559 respondents in Republic of Croatia. The study actively involved 559 participants. The survey questionnaire was sent to 1127 potential participants, of which 559 responded to the survey. The relevance of a sample of 559 people in consumer behavior research depends on several factors, such as the research objectives, the level of accuracy required, and the characteristics of the population being studied. In general, a sample size of 559 people is a moderately large sample size, which can provide reliable and generalizable results. A sample of this size can also provide adequate statistical power to detect meaningful differences or relationships between variables. The respondents were consumers of all age groups selected at random. Choosing a random sample of the population in a survey is significant in researching consumer behavior for several reasons:
• Representativeness: A random sample provides a representative sample of the population being studied, ensuring that the results are generalizable to the larger population. This helps to minimize bias and increase the validity and reliability of the research.
• Avoidance of Sampling Bias: A random sample can help to avoid sampling bias, where certain groups or individuals are overrepresented or underrepresented in the sample. This can result in biased results and can limit the generalizability of the findings.
• Increased Precision: A random sample can increase the precision of the results, reducing the margin of error and increasing the accuracy of the research. This helps to ensure that the findings are robust and reliable.
• Ethical Considerations: Selecting a random sample helps to ensure that all individuals in the population have an equal chance of being included in the study. This helps to ensure that the study is conducted ethically and respects the rights of all participants.
• Improved Generalizability: The use of a random sample helps to ensure that the findings are generalizable to the larger population, making the results more applicable to real-world situations. This is essential for informing business decisions and developing effective marketing strategies.
The questionnaire survey was conducted in 2023 using the Google forms tool. The survey questionnaire link was sent to the respondents via e-mail, through social networks and mobile applications.
A demographic analysis of the respondents showed that more women than men responded to the questionnaire. Most of the respondents were in the 36–45 age group, while the fewest were 56 and older. Most of the respondents are employed and married. Statistical processing shows that most respondents have a monthly income above 1,099 euro, while the group earning up to 499 euro per month is the least numerous. It is important to note that the sample participating in the research was chosen by random selection without any intention of directing or prompting respondents’ answers. As the field of consumer behavior is broad and encompasses various gender and age groups, as well as differences among them with respect to certain characteristics, the respondents had to be covered by a wider research area.
These materials clearly show that numerous influences define customer behavior. It’s often hard to define all of them. It is even more difficult to classify them into only four groups of influences that we have analyzed in this paper. If they were to ask for a list of criteria, it would be very long and it would be difficult to assess all the influences on consumer behavior individually. So, there is a lack of research on the impact on consumer habits at the operational level due to the potentially numerous and varied influences in practice. Therefore, this study proposes a multi-criteria decision-making model (MCDM) based on the weight calculated from the AHP method tool to obtain a ranking of the various influences on consumer behavior.
The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is a method of evaluating multiple conflicting criteria to determine the best one among different variants [44]. In this method, according to Rao [45], several different variants/alternatives are examined based on the constraints, preferences, and priorities of the decision-makers. According to Jurik [7] decision-making is an activity that (1) defines and analyzes a decision-making problem, (2) proposes possible variants of solutions, and (3) chooses one of the variants according to certain criteria. In this study, we use the AHP method, which is applied to numerous decision-making problems for decades. It is a decision-making method based on subjective evaluations of certain criteria and variants. The tools of the AHP method are used to assign pairs of weights to rank the variables/criteria to make the correct decision. It is the preferred tool for assigning pairs of weights to rank variables/criteria to make the right decision. The advantage of the AHP model decades ago is reflected in its numerous capabilities and in its flexibility. Decision-making, ranking, and prioritization of problems allow managers to manage and formulate a hierarchical model according to their situation.
It enables the preparation of effective decisions and speeds up the decision-making process. The logical concept of problem structuring is adaptable and functional. Such a concept enables the quantification of the relationship between components (goals, criteria, and variants). Furthermore, it facilitates the evaluation of alternative solutions, then their ranking, and, in the end, the selection of the best variant. The application of the AHP method is widespread and used in many different areas. As we can see from the studies of Canco, et. al; Gago, et. al.; Lacurezeanu, et. al.; Khan, et. al.; Xi, et. al.; Costa, et. al.; Chang, et. al.; Tošović-Stevanović, et. al.; Amzat, et. al.; Elvis, et. al., the solutions obtained by the AHP method have led to a series of helpful decisions in economics [46], energy [47], management [48], environment [49,50], health [51], transportation [52], agriculture [53], education [54], and industry [55]. Through numerous iterations of problem-solving, which are carried out through a hierarchical algorithm, the decision maker directs his actions within the AHP model to increase the quality and efficiency of all his decisions [56]. Saaty [57] emphasized that to reach the right decision, it is necessary to decompose the decision into several iterations: defining the problem, defining the hierarchy structure, creating matrices for pairwise comparisons, and making prioritization. All of the above indicates that the AHP is one of the most preferred methods in multiple decision-making. Figure 5 summarizes the advantages of the AHP method for problem-solving and decision-making.
The basic concept of the AHP method consists of three principles of analytical thinking. Within the framework of the principle of structuring the hierarchy, a logical structure of interconnected components is created, as shown in Figure 6 [7]. A detailed explanation of the use of AHP methods and results through iterations can be found in the article [53]. The principle of prioritization implies a mutual comparison of all evaluation levels. Pairwise comparisons are created according to numerical scale. The resulting numerical values allow experts to create a new matrix. The principle of logical consistency includes measuring the intensity of consistency between objectives, criteria, and variants. Also, study of Ristanović, et. al. [59] emphasizes, the hierarchical structure of the AHP method first calculates the priority of the criteria according to the given problem; then the priority of the alternatives for the specified criteria is calculated; and finally, the priorities of the alternatives according to the defined problem. A pairwise comparison is made within the matrix. Weight vectors for each level are obtained. In the last step, all results are ranked according to the size of the calculated weight. The highest values give the best solution to choose. Based on this, a final decision is made on the influence of factors on consumer habits.
Unlike many researchers who before us presented the application of the AHP method through basic steps, we will present the basic concept of the AHP method in more detail, through a series of the following smaller steps:
  • Determine the aim, criteria, and variants of the decision problem – to compile the hierarchical structure. This process is often referred to as problem decomposition into a hierarchical tree.
  • Select experts whose will generate a pairwise comparison matrix (P = n×n)
To make pairwise comparison of the elements, the method of eigenvalues is used, by which the weight vectors of the entered elements are determined through a linear system (equation 1):
A * ω = λ * ω ,   e T = 1
, where A is the comparison matrix of the dimension nxn, ω the eigenvalue vector, λ the eigenvalue, and e is the unit vector.
The experts carried out the process of weighting the criteria and variants. Experts come from the academic community, business bodies, and research centers. The weighting process meant that each expert analyzed the answers to the questions from the completed questionnaires, namely those that directly related to the criteria (customs, morals, influence of famous people, environment, lifestyle, budget, COVID-19, social networks), and then and on variants (social, cultural, personal, and psychological factors). For the weighting process, the experts used the Saaty scale (see also [59,60]).
3.
Using Saati’s [56] scale, the relative importance of two criteria is calculated
n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
R.I. 0 0 0.58 0.89 1.11 1.25 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.49 1.51 1.48 1.56 1.57
4.
The weights of the relative criteria are obtained after the matrix is previously normalized.
5.
The distribution of the criteria should be specified.
6.
Calculate the criteria weight vector.
7.
The score matrix (S) is obtained from the option score matrix (n×m).
C I = λ m a x n n 1
, where λmax is the main eigenvalue of the matrix S, CI is the consistency index.
8.
The options are ranked from the score matrix.
The last phase in the AHP method’s hierarchy structure is the calculation of the consistency ratio (CR). This is an essential rating because it shows how consistent the ratings were across the samples. If the CR is much higher than 0.1, the estimates are unreliable, and the procedure must be repeated. The equation for calculating the consistency ratio is as follows (equation 3):
C R = C I R I
, where CR is the consistency ratio, CI is the consistency index, and RI is the random consistency index. According to Saaty [57], if the value of CR is less or equal to 0.1, it represents an acceptable range. (Statistical data are available on request: pairwise comparison, standardized matrix, and CR and CI worksheets).

3. Results and discussion

Through statistical data processing of the survey questionnaire, we have summarized the analysis into four categories of influential factors on consumer behavior. The survey results show us the attitudes of respondents related to the influences on their behavior. The results provide a significant basis for further research and investigations through different models. The results give us insights into future perspectives of approaching consumers in the market and timely adapting to their needs. The research results have provided us with a foundation for understanding consumer behavior, as well as an excellent basis for expanding and continuing the research.
Figure 7 shows that most respondents agree that their shopping habits have changed over time, indicating that some of the listed factors played a role in the behavior of the surveyed consumers. The respondents mostly answered that their shopping habits change over time, which is logical. Shopping habits can change over time due to a complex interplay of technological, economic, social, cultural, environmental, and health and safety factors. As consumers’ needs, preferences, and motivations change, businesses must adapt their marketing strategies, product offerings, and customer service to meet the evolving needs of their customers. As an individual grows and progresses through learning and experience, their attitudes also change. Everyone is different, and these influences change in different ways and at different times. It depends on the individual which influencing factor they are more susceptible to in their behavior.
Figure 8 shows the impact of personal factors on consumer behavior, where a significant impact of personal budget, price increases, and job loss on consumer behavior is visible.
Psychological factors play a crucial role in shaping consumer behavior by affecting individuals’ perceptions, motivations, and decision-making processes. Perception of products is influenced by personal experiences, beliefs, and attitudes, while motivation drives the desire to fulfill specific needs or wants. Decision-making processes involve factors such as problem recognition, information search, and evaluation of alternatives. Marketers need to consider these psychological factors to create targeted campaigns that resonate with consumers’ needs, emotions, and thought processes. Figure 9 shows the impact of psychological factors on consumer behavior, where the war in Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic as significant events in the recent past have a significant impact on the market situation, which is reflected in consumer behavior. This includes product shortages, price increases, increased online shopping, and product delivery delays. There are also many other psychological factors that influence consumer to behave like this: financial crisis, crisis on the oil and gas market, and many other.
Cultural factors have impact on consumer behavior by influencing preferences, purchasing decisions, and consumption patterns. Values and beliefs shape attitudes towards products, while norms and customs guide behavior within a culture. Social class affects preferences for specific brands, and language and communication styles determine how marketing messages are perceived. To effectively target consumers, businesses must consider these cultural elements and tailor their marketing strategies accordingly. Figure 10 shows the impact of cultural factors on consumer behavior, which exists but is not as dominant as the impact of personal and psychological factors. However, the influence of life values, habits, and historical heritage has a certain role in consumer behavior.
Figure 11 shows the impact of social factors on consumer behavior, where the impact is negligible, and the respondents are indifferent to social status, the influence of family, friends, or acquaintances.
The results of the questionnaire survey conducted on the sample of consumers to determine the influencing factors on consumer behavior can be seen below (Table 2). They unequivocally show that intensity of all the factors that influence consumer habits is not uniform. Thus, we rejected the first hypothesis of the model (H1). By evaluating the presented alternatives, the results showed the dominance of personal factors in the creation of consumer habits, compared to other factors. This confirms the second hypothesis of the model (H2). The evaluation of the criteria showed that the budget, among other criteria, plays a key role in purchasing habits, thus confirming the third hypothesis of the model (H3).
Note: SC – social factors, CF – cultural factors, PF – personal factors, PsF – psychological factors, C – customs, M – morals, FP – influence of famous people, E – environment, LS – lifestyle, B – budget, C-19 – COVID-19, SN – social networks.
Based on the analyzed expert evaluations and the results of the survey conducted through direct interviews with the respondents, we came to results that unequivocally show the influence of various factors and determinant consumer habits: (i) personal and psychological factors dominate, while (ii) the key criteria for the consumer are the budget and lifestyle. Table 3 shows the results of the AHP model. The following criteria, which are specific to the Republic of Croatia, were selected for analysis: Criterion 1 – customs, Criterion 2 – morals, Criterion 3 – influence of famous people, Criterion 4 – environment, Criterion 5 – lifestyle, Criterion 6 – budget, Criterion 7 – COVID-19, Criterion 8 – social networks. The results of the AHP method show that, according to the rank, two criteria dominate: budget (score 0.26) and lifestyle (score 0.22). Four variants were analyzed (Variant 1 – social factors, Variant 2 – cultural factors, Variant 3 – personal factors, Variant 4 – psychological factors) and the following results were obtained: The dominant factors influencing consumer habits are personal influences (0.40) and psychological factors (0.34).
Verification of all steps in the hierarchical structure of the AHP method was carried out through a common table of all weight vectors. In the final table (Table 2), the last field in the lower right corner reflects the sum of all alternative values (the last column), which corresponds to the sum of all criteria values (the last row). That identity is equal to 1. In other words, it is a confirmation that the whole process was carried out methodologically correctly.
The results obtained by the model show the dominance of the influence of personal and psychological characteristics of a person when purchasing. The customer is primarily guided by his inner state when he evaluates the need for the product, the choice of satisfaction, and personal mood. The key elements influencing the purchase are lifestyle, knowledge, and motivation, mainly related to salary and available budget. All these obtained model results correspond to the previously highlighted conclusions from Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11.
The main limitation in assessing the impact on consumer behavior stems from the large number of impacts that are difficult to measure. Even those impacts that can be measured are not always comparable, like emotions, feelings, belonging, acceptance, etc. The number of publications applying consumer neuroscience research is gradually increasing [21]. This includes highly complex functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based research on consumer decision-making and emotion-specific brain regions, and consumer studies based on machine learning models to optimize decision-making. Chaudhary, et al. [61] used Machine mathematical modelling based on learning for prediction of social media behavior using big data analytics. We can find studies in the field of cultural, personal, social, and psychological factors that influence consumer behavior. In their research, Al Hamli, et al.; Rojhe; Rozy, et al.; Santosa, et al.; Shamri, et al. [62,63,64,65,66] conclude that cultural, social, personal and psychological factors have significant impact on consumer behavior. Ahmadi [67] shows the importance of publicizing the pandemic’s penetration among the population and the visible impact it has on stockpiling products by customers. Furthermore, this varies from culture to culture and the impact is not the same on everyone. The study of Li, et. al. [68] “investigated the relationship between the pandemic severity, sense of fear, sense of control, and conformity consumer behavior in the context of COVID-19. The results show that sense of fear plays a mediating role in the impact of the pandemic severity on conformity consumer behavior, while sense of control does not play a moderating role in the impact of the pandemic severity on sense of fear, and in the impact of sense of fear on conformity consumer behavior”. The results of the research of Danish, et. al. [19] “suggested that functional value price, functional value quality, social value identity, social value responsibility, emotional value, and conditional value have a significant and positive effect on consumer choice behavior”.
Study of Jia, et. al. [69] point out that in the hotel industry, social influence is dominant if the consumer’s attitude towards the brand is to be maintained. The results of Kumar, et. al. [70] showed that ethical obligations drive consumers’ green purchase intention and highlight that they are important for marketers and policy makers. Research of Yang, et. al. [71] showed that trust, habit, and intention for e-shopping significantly influence consumers’ e-shopping behavior. They particularly highlighted personal factors, innovation, ease of payment, habit, risk, prices, hedonic motivation, service quality, and trust. The impact of social networks on consumer behavior was measured by Muller-Perez, et. al. [72]. Like our results, they found a positive impact of social networks on consumers, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. Ali, et. al. [68] showed that the behavior of milk consumers can be predicted through raw milk prices.

8. Conclusions

Consumer behavior is changing due to the accelerated pace of life, changes in lifestyle, life values, and the influence of external and internal stimuli on the human body. Also, consumer attitudes and perceptions change due to financial crises, natural disasters, wars, and pandemics. For the above reasons, it is necessary to monitor the behavior of consumers and adapt the offer on the market to their needs.
In the paper, an analysis of the impact of various factors on consumer decisions among respondents in Croatia was carried out using the multi-criteria AHP decision-making model. The results show that personal factors dominate over other factors, such as psychological, social, and cultural. Also, personal budget has a dominant role for consumers compared to other criteria (COVID-19, lifestyle, habits, social networks, etc.).
The use of the AHP model proved to be an excellent tool for evaluating multi-criteria problems in assessing the impact on the consumer. It is proved, again, that the AHP method is the most widely used in the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) process.
This study provides valuable new insights into the growing consumer perception literature. Future research should conduct a more detailed analysis of underlying consumer influence factors, identify new influence factors, and examine the significance of expanding consumer influence, including the undoubted differences between nations and regions.
In our research, it has been proven that influential factors on consumer behavior have different levels of impact. The greatest influence comes from personal factors as well as an individual’s income and financial capabilities. An individual’s financial capabilities and income affect what they can afford, which directly influences their purchases. A person with higher income is more likely to buy expensive and luxury products, while one with lower income will be forced to shop rationally. Personal factors significantly influence decision-making regarding purchases. For instance, if someone cares about ecology, they will certainly buy eco-friendly products. The motives and motivation of an individual for buying a product are very important, and the influences on motivation are varied.
There are several reasons why there may not be enough research in the field of consumer behavior:
• Complexity of Consumer Behavior: Consumer behavior is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that involves various psychological, social, personal and cultural factors. Studying all these factors can be challenging and requires a significant amount of time, resources, and expertise.
• Rapidly Changing Consumer Trends: Consumer behavior is continually evolving, and new trends are emerging at a fast pace. Keeping up with these changes can be difficult for researchers, and it may be challenging to capture the nuances of consumer behavior accurately.
• Limited Funding: Conducting research in the field of consumer behavior can be expensive, and securing funding can be challenging. This can limit the number of studies that can be conducted, and researchers may have to prioritize certain areas of research over others.
• Lack of Collaboration: Collaboration among researchers, businesses, and policymakers can be essential in advancing research in the field of consumer behavior. However, there may be a lack of collaboration among these stakeholders, which can limit the scope and impact of research in this field.
• Ethical Considerations: Research involving human subjects must adhere to strict ethical guidelines, which can be time-consuming and costly. These guidelines can also limit the scope of research in some areas.
• Sample Size: The size of the sample can significantly impact the generalizability of the findings. Small sample sizes may not be representative of the population, while large sample sizes may be difficult and expensive to obtain.
• Time Constraints: Conducting longitudinal studies can provide valuable insights into consumer behavior over time, but they can be time-consuming and expensive. Researchers may face challenges in securing funding for long-term research projects.
• Limited Access to Data: Access to data can be a significant limitation in consumer behavior research. Some data, such as sales data or customer data, may be proprietary and difficult to obtain. Additionally, data privacy laws and regulations may limit the use of certain types of data.
• Influence of Social Desirability Bias: Social desirability bias occurs when participants respond in a way they believe is socially acceptable rather than their true feelings or behaviors. This can be a limitation in self-reported studies, and researchers must take measures to reduce the impact of this bias.
Future research on consumer behavior may face limitations related to sample size, time constraints, ethical considerations, limited access to data, the influence of social desirability bias, and the complexity of consumer behavior. Researchers must be aware of these limitations and take steps to mitigate their impact on the validity and generalizability of their findings. The complex nature of consumer behavior, rapidly changing trends, limited funding, lack of collaboration, and ethical considerations can all contribute to a shortage of research in the field of consumer behavior. However, understanding consumer behavior is crucial for businesses and policymakers to develop effective strategies and policies, and more research in this area is necessary.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Marko Šostar; methodology, Vladimir Ristanović and Marko Šostar;.; formal analysis, Vladimir Ristanović and Marko Šostar ; investigation, Marko Šostar; resources, Vladimir Ristanović and Marko Šostar; data curation Vladimir Ristanović; writing—original draft preparation, Vladimir Ristanović and Marko Šostar; writing—review and editing, Marko Šostar; supervision Vladimir Ristanović.; project administration Marko Šostar.; funding acquisition; Marko Šostar. All authors have agreed to publish this version of manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external finance.

Informed Consent Statement

All authors have approved the manuscript and agree its submission to Sustainability.

Data Availability Statement

We confirm that neither the manuscript nor any parts of its content are currently under consideration or published in another journal.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Al-Ghaswyneh, O.F.M. Factors Affecting the Consumers Decision Behavior of Buying Green Products. ESIC Mark. Econ. Bus. J. 2019, 50, 389–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Qazzafi, S. Factor affecting consumer buying behavior: A conceptual study. International Journal for Scientific Research & Development 2020, 8, 45–57. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nosi, C.; Zollo, L.; Rialti, R.; Ciappei, C. Sustainable consumption in organic food buying behavior: the case of quinoa. Br. Food J. 2020, 122, 976–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dias, A.; Sousa, B.; Santos, V.; Ramos, P.; Madeira, A. Wine Tourism and Sustainability Awareness: A Consumer Behavior Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ramya, N. , & Ali, S. M. Factors affecting consumer buying behavior. International journal of applied research 2016, 2, 76–80. [Google Scholar]
  6. ostar, M. , Ramanathan, N. H., Serzhanov, V. The Impact of COVID 19 Pandemic on Consumer Behavior. Telematique 2023, 22, 617–622. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jurík, L.; Horňáková, N.; Šantavá, E.; Cagáňová, D.; Sablik, J. Application of AHP method for project selection in the context of sustainable development. Wireless Networks. 2020, 28, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. ostar, M. , Chandrasekharan, H. A. Importance of Nonverbal Communication in Sales. Proceedings of 8th International Conference “Vallis Aurea: Focus on Tourism & Rural Development. Polytechnic in Pozega, DAAM Vienna. 2022, 451-460.
  9. Michman D., R. , Mazze M. E., & Greco J. A. Lifestyle Marketing: Reaching the New American Consumer. ABC-CLIO, United States. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  10. Blackwell R., D. , Miniard P. W. and Engel J. F. Consumer Behavior. Dryden Press, Harcourt College Publishers, Ft. Worth, Texas. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  11. Etim, S. N. , Ebitu, T. E. Comparative Analysis of Business and Consumer Buying Behavior and Decisions: Opportunities and Challenges in Nigeria, British Journal of Marketing Studies (BJMS), 2019, 7(5), 72-86.
  12. Solomon, R. M. Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being, Global Edition, 12th edition. Pearson. 2017.
  13. Fruth, A. , & Neacsu, M. Online Consumer Reviews as Marketing Instrument. Knowledge Horizons. Economics. 2014, 6(3), 128–131. [Google Scholar]
  14. Schiffman, L. G. & Kanuk, L. L. Consumer behavior, 6th Edition. Upper saddle River, N. J. Prentice Hall. United Kingdom. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  15. Suroto, K.S.S.K.S. Factors influencing consumer’s purchase decision of formula milk in Malang City. IOSR J. Bus. Manag. 2013, 9, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kotler, P. , Wong, V., Saunders, J. & Armstrong G. Principles of Marketing. Mate d.o.o., Croatia. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kotler, P. , Keller, L. K. Marketing Management. 14th Edition, Pearson Education. USA. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shareef, M.A.; Mukerji, B.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Rana, N.P.; Islam, R. Social media marketing: Comparative effect of advertisement sources. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 46, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Danish, M.; Ali, S.; Ahmad, M.A.; Zahid, H. The Influencing Factors on Choice Behavior Regarding Green Electronic Products: Based on the Green Perceived Value Model. Economies 2019, 7, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cao, Y.; Ajjan, H.; Hong, P. Post-purchase shipping and customer service experiences in online shopping and their impact on customer satisfaction. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2018, 30, 400–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, C.; Sun, K.; Liu, L. The Formation and Transformation Mechanisms of Deep Consumer Engagement and Purchase Behavior in E-Commerce Live Streaming. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Malhotra, N. , Nunan, D., & Birks, D. Marketing Research: An Applied Approach. 5th Edition. Pearson. Available online: https://crispindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Marketing-research-An-applied-approach.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  23. Bin, S. Social Network Emotional Marketing Influence Model of Consumers’ Purchase Behavior. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nawi, M. C. A. A. N. C, Ismail, L. N., Rashidi, M. A. Z. N, Aziz, N. F. N. N. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chowdhury, A.; Shil, N.C. Public Sector Reforms and New Public Management: Exploratory Evidence from Australian Public Sector. Asian Dev. Policy Rev. 2017, 5, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Khaniwale, M. Consumer buying behavior, International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research. 2017, 14 (2), 278-286.
  27. Lai, C.-F. Tariff, Consumption Home Bias and Macroeconomic Dynamics. Asian Econ. Financial Rev. 2016, 6, 425–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sangroya, D. & Nayak, J.K. Factors influencing buying behavior of green energy consumer. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019, 151, 393–405. [Google Scholar]
  29. Al-Salamin, H. & Al-Hassan, E. The Impact of pricing on consumer buying behavior in Saudi Arabia: Ah-Hassa case Study. European Journal of Business and Management 2013, 8, 62–73. [Google Scholar]
  30. Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Jensen, J.H.; Jensen, M.H.; Kulikovskaja, V. Consumer behaviour towards price-reduced suboptimal foods in the supermarket and the relation to food waste in households. Appetite 2017, 116, 246–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Waheed, A.; Yang, J.; Ahmed, Z.; Rafique, K.; Ashfaq, M. Is Marketing Limited to Promotional Activities? The Concept of Marketing: A Concise Review of the Literatur. Asian Dev. Policy Rev. 2017, 5, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Svatosova, V. Motivation of Online Buyer Behavior. J. Competitiveness 2013, 5, 14–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bezzaoua, M. & Janta, A.R.. The relationship between cultural values and consumer motivations for purchasing luxury brands. Ecoforum Journal. 2016, 5(1), 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kwajaffa, F. B. Determinants Factors on Consumer Buying Behavior in Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria. Gusau International Journal of Management and Social Science. 2022, 5(1), 85–100. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lawan, L.; Zanna, R. Evaluation of Socio-Cultural Factors Influencing Consumer Buying Behaviour of Clothes in Borno State, Nigeria. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2013, 1, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nawawi, M.T. Factors of Consumer Behavior That Affect Purchasing Decisions on Blackberry Smartphone. Winners 2016, 17, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Etuk, A.; Anyadighibe, J.A.; James, E.E.; Ukpe, M.U. SOCIOLOGICAL FACTORS AND CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOUR TOWARDS FASHION CLOTHING. Int. J. Appl. Res. Soc. Sci. 2022, 4, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sonwaney, V. & Chincholkar, S. Identifying the Factors Impacting Online Consumer Buying Behavior. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research. 2019, 8(8), 445-456. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 2019, 8, 445–456. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zwanka, R.J.; Buff, C. COVID-19 Generation: A Conceptual Framework of the Consumer Behavioral Shifts to Be Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2020, 33, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hall, C.M.; Fieger, P.; Prayag, G.; Dyason, D. Panic Buying and Consumption Displacement during COVID-19: Evidence from New Zealand. Economies 2021, 9, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Singh, P.; Arora, L.; Choudhry, A. Consumer Behavior in the Service Industry: An Integrative Literature Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability 2022, 15, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ayaviri-Nina, D. V, Jaramillo-Quinzo, S. N., Quisepe-Fernandez, M. G., Mahmud, I., Alasqah, I., Alharibi, F. A. T., Alqarawi, N., Carrascosa, C., Saraiva, A., Alfheeaid, A. H. & Raposo, A. Consumer Behavior and Attitude towards the Purchase of Organic Products in Riobamba, Ecuador. Foods 2022, 11, 28–49.
  43. Victor, S. M. & Viswanadham, N. The Influence of Personal Factors on Consumer Purchasing Decisions of Selected Durable Goods in Mwanza city. Direct Research Journal of Management and Strategic Studies 2022, 3(4), 70–77. [CrossRef]
  44. Ozdemir, S.; Sahin, G. Multi-criteria decision-making in the location selection for a solar PV power plant using AHP. Measurement 2018, 129, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rao, R.V. Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Canco, I.; Kruja, D.; Iancu, T. AHP, a Reliable Method for Quality Decision Making: A Case Study in Business. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gago, D.; Mendes, P.; Murta, P.; Cabrita, N.; Teixeira, M.R. Stakeholders’ Perceptions of New Digital Energy Management Platform in Municipality of Loulé, Southern Portugal: A SWOT-AHP Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lacurezeanu, R.; Chis, A.; Bresfelean, V.P. Integrated Management Solution for a Sustainable SME—Selection Proposal Using AHP. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Khan, K.; Depczyńska, K.S.; Dembińska, I.; Ioppolo, G. Most Relevant Sustainability Criteria for Urban Infrastructure Projects—AHP Analysis for the Gulf States. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xi, X.; Poh, K.L. A Novel Integrated Decision Support Tool for Sustainable Water Resources Management in Singapore: Synergies Between System Dynamics and Analytic Hierarchy Process. Water Resour. Manag. 2014, 29, 1329–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Costa, W.S.; Pinheiro, P.R.; dos Santos, N.M.; Cabral, L.d.A.F. Aligning the Goals Hybrid Model for the Diagnosis of Mental Health Quality. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Dong, S. Comprehensive Sustainability Evaluation of High-Speed Railway (HSR) Construction Projects Based on Unascertained Measure and Analytic Hierarchy Process. Sustainability 2018, 10, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tošović-Stevanović, A.; Ristanović, V.; Ćalović, D.; Lalić, G.; Žuža, M.; Cvijanović, G. Small Farm Business Analysis Using the AHP Model for Efficient Assessment of Distribution Channels. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Amzat, I.H.; Najimdeen, A.H.A.; Walters, L.M.; Yusuf, B.; Padilla-Valdez, N. Determining Service Quality Indicators to Recruit and Retain International Students in Malaysia Higher Education Institutions: Global Issues and Local Challenges. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Elvis, N.T.; Cheng, H.; Providence, B.I. Exploring the Optimistic Approaches and Directives of Cameroon’s Textile Sector for Reliable Development. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Saaty, T.L. How to make a decision: The analytic decision process. European Journal of Operational Research. 1990, 48, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Saaty, T.L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 2008, 1, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Saaty, T. L. Decision making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. USA. 2012.
  59. Ristanović, V.; Primorac, D.; Kozina, G. Operational Risk Management Using Multi-Criteria Assessment (AHP Model). Teh. Vjesn. - Tech. Gaz. 2021, 28, 678–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ristanović, V.; Tošović-Stevanović, A.; Maican, S.; Muntean, A. Economic overview of the distribution channels used by Eastern European small farms for their agricultural products. Agric. Econ. 2022, 68, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chaudhary, K.; Alam, M.; Al-Rakhami, M.S.; Gumaei, A. Machine learning-based mathematical modelling for prediction of social media consumer behavior using big data analytics. J. Big Data 2021, 8, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Al Hamli, S.S.; Sobaih, A.E.E. Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior towards Online Shopping in Saudi Arabia Amid COVID-19: Implications for E-Businesses Post Pandemic. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2023, 16, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rojhe, K. Review Paper on Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior. Test Engineering and Management. 2020, 83. 7059. [Google Scholar]
  64. Rozy, F. , Fauzi, A., Silalahi, S. A. The Influence of Cultural, Social, Personal, and Psychological Factors on the Process of Making Decision to Buy Toyota in Auto2000, Binjai Branch Office. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM). 2019. [Google Scholar]
  65. Santosa, R. The Influence of Cultural Factors, Social Factors, and Personal Factors against Customer Purchase Decisions in Using Wedding Services Organizer in Surabaya. Int. J. Rev. Manag. Bus. Entrep. (RMBE) 2021, 1, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shamri, S.N.; Suhaimi, N.A.M.; Alwi@Ali, A. The Factors Affecting the Consumer Buying Behaviour Towards Local Brand of Food Product in Selangor. J. Agrobiotechnology 2021, 12, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ahmadi, I.; Habel, J.; Jia, M.; Lee, N.; Wei, S. Consumer Stockpiling Across Cultures During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Int. Mark. 2021, 30, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, J.; Jin, X.; Zhao, T.; Ma, T. Conformity Consumer Behavior and External Threats: An Empirical Analysis in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic. SAGE Open 2021, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jia, T.; Iqbal, S.; Ayub, A.; Fatima, T.; Rasool, Z. Promoting Responsible Sustainable Consumer Behavior through Sustainability Marketing: The Boundary Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Brand Image. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kumar, R.; Kumar, K.; Singh, R.; Sá, J.C.; Carvalho, S.; Santos, G. Modeling Environmentally Conscious Purchase Behavior: Examining the Role of Ethical Obligation and Green Self-Identity. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yang, H.; Luo, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Zou, J.; Masukujjaman, M.; Ibrahim, A.M. Modeling the Enablers of Consumers’ E-Shopping Behavior: A Multi-Analytic Approach. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Müller-Pérez, J.; Acevedo-Duque, A.; Rettig, P.V.; García-Salirrosas, E.E.; Fernández-Mantilla, M.M.; Izquierdo-Marín, S.S.; Álvarez-Becerra, R. Consumer Behavior after COVID-19: Interpersonal Influences, eWOM and Digital Lifestyles in More Diverse Youths. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Model of consumer behavior.
Figure 1. Model of consumer behavior.
Preprints 74158 g001
Figure 2. Factors influencing consumer behavior.
Figure 2. Factors influencing consumer behavior.
Preprints 74158 g002
Figure 3. Hypotheses of the study.
Figure 3. Hypotheses of the study.
Preprints 74158 g003
Figure 4. Research design.
Figure 4. Research design.
Preprints 74158 g004
Figure 5. Advantages of AHP method. [58].
Figure 5. Advantages of AHP method. [58].
Preprints 74158 g005
Figure 6. The hierarchy structure of the AHP method. [7].
Figure 6. The hierarchy structure of the AHP method. [7].
Preprints 74158 g006
Figure 7. Consumer behavior during time.
Figure 7. Consumer behavior during time.
Preprints 74158 g007
Figure 8. Impact of personal factors on consumer behavior.
Figure 8. Impact of personal factors on consumer behavior.
Preprints 74158 g008
Figure 9. Impact of psychological factors on consumer behavior.
Figure 9. Impact of psychological factors on consumer behavior.
Preprints 74158 g009
Figure 10. Impact of cultural factors on consumer behavior.
Figure 10. Impact of cultural factors on consumer behavior.
Preprints 74158 g010
Figure 11. Impact of social factors on consumer behavior.
Figure 11. Impact of social factors on consumer behavior.
Preprints 74158 g011
Table 1. Respondent demographic data.
Table 1. Respondent demographic data.
Gender Number
Male 201
Female 358
Age Number
18–25 134
26–35 117
36–45 173
46–55 79
56+ 56
Employment status Number
Unemployed 148
Employed 411
Marital status Number
Not married 241
Married 318
Monthly income Number
Up to 499 euro 127
500–799 euro 83
800–1099 euro 153
Above 1099 euro 196
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated