Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Review

Categorizing Critical Factors of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Implementation Globally

Altmetrics

Downloads

139

Views

61

Comments

0

Submitted:

09 June 2023

Posted:

12 June 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
This paper presents a systematic literature review that identifies critical factors impacting the implementation of advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) worldwide. The study utilizes two databases, ProQuest and Compendex, as well as Google Scholar. The study identified eight dimensions that illustrate the critical factors of AMT adoption and implementation: education, planning, top management know-how, technical know-how, business, economic impact, regulations, and social impact. The results highlight a research gap in understanding the need for effective integration among these eight dimensions in developed and developing economies. Consequently, the study recommends the adoption of a broader perspective that considers the role of integration and interaction between critical factors in each category and their impact on AMT implementation. The systematic literature review conducted in this study reviews several critical factors related to the adoption and implementation of AMT.
Keywords: 
Subject: Engineering  -   Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. Introduction

Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT) refers to the adoption of various hard and soft technologies developed to improve manufacturing capabilities [1]. Different types of AMT are used for specific manufacturing purposes and are functionally classified. The practical applications of AMT contribute to the rapid growth of the global industrial sector. However, the rapidly changing technology presents both opportunities and risks. It is crucial to adopt and implement AMT correctly to add value to the industry, optimize output, and avoid uncertainties [2,3].
The adoption of AMT plays a pivotal role in driving industrial transformation in any country. However, it is challenging due to the complexities associated with the implementation process [4]. The critical factors impacting AMT adoption in one area of the industry can also be applicable to other areas reliant on technology. From a broader perspective, AMT adoption is closely tied to the rapid growth of technology [5], encompassing various types of manufacturing and industry applications.
Currently, substantial investments are directed towards adopting new AMT for different manufacturing purposes to achieve competitive excellence [6]. However, uncertainties associated with AMT adoption and implementation pose challenges to industrial development [7]. Uncovering these uncertainties is crucial for research and development efforts to ensure a healthy and competitive industrial sector. To better understand the potential of AMT implementation, this study conducted a systematic literature review of published studies using the PRISMA approach to categorize the critical factors impacting AMT implementation.

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review utilizes the research contained in the ProQuest and Compendex databases, as well as the Google Scholar search engine. The search was conducted using specific keywords, as shown in Table 1, to minimize potential bias and enhance the overall quality of the review. The search encompassed studies published between 1985 and 2022. In the screening process, inclusion criteria were applied to assess the content of the studies, resulting in a final set of 109 studies. The studies were then analyzed to identify their coverage of the eight dimensions of AMT implementation, which include education, planning, top management know-how, technical know-how, business, economic impact, regulations, and social impact.
As a result, a total of 1,282 studies from the ProQuest database, 864 studies from the Compendex database, and 1,822 studies from the Google Scholar search engine were identified. The inclusion criteria for this phase included documents published between 1985 and 2022. In the second phase, additional keywords were added to narrow down the search results, resulting in a total of 679 screened documents. In the third phase, inclusion criteria were applied to assess the content of the studies from the previous phase, resulting in a total of 457 studies. The inclusion criteria included studies written in English, peer-reviewed, book chapters, and official governmental reports.
In the second phase, a detailed assessment of the full text of the studies was conducted to ensure that each study addressed one or more of the specified eight dimensions of AMT implementation, namely education, planning, top management know-how, technical know-how, business, economic impact, regulations, and social impact. At the end of this phase, a total of 109 studies were included, with 41 studies from ProQuest, 33 studies from Compendex, and 35 studies from Google Scholar.
Preprints 76177 g001
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart of the review process.
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart of the review process.
Preprints 76177 g001

3. Results

This systematic review identified 109 published studies that examined the critical factors of implementing AMT, as shown in Table 2 and Figure 2. These studies were analyzed in relation to the eight dimensions of AMT implementation. A significant number of studies (n = 32; 29%) focused on the top management dimension. The economy dimension had a similar number of studies (n = 13; 12%) as the technology dimension (n = 13; 12%). The education and regulations dimensions each had five studies (5%) associated with them. Additionally, there were 12 studies (11%) categorized under the business dimension, 10 studies (9%) under the social dimension, and 6 studies (6%) under the planning dimension. The remaining studies addressed critical factors that spanned multiple dimensions and were categorized as an additional mixed category, which comprised 13 studies (12%).
The studies included in this literature review covered a wide range of countries globally. Categorizing the studies based on demography involved assigning each study to a country based on the location where the research was conducted, as shown in Table 3. The studies covered a total of twenty-eight countries. The United States had the largest number of published articles, with thirty-four studies representing thirty-one of the studies included in this literature review. The significant number of studies conducted in the US highlights the crucial role of educational and research institutes in generating high-quality research on AMT, as well as the substantial number of companies involved in AMT applications in the country. Furthermore, a comparison between the number of studies conducted in developed and developing countries reveals that developed countries have a much higher number of published studies than developing countries. Developed countries accounted for sixty-seven percent of the published articles, while developing countries represented thirty-two percent of the studies included in this literature review.
This systematic literature review analyzed a total of one hundred and nine studies that were published from 1985 to 2022 and are non-uniformly distributed in time (Figure 3). Except for a few notable spikes in the number of studies published in 1992 and 2009, there is no obvious pattern or trend in the information available. The fact that the number of studies published increased between 1992 and 2009 may indicate that there were significant developments or breakthroughs in advanced manufacturing technology during those years, which caused an increase in interest and activity in the field. Furthermore, the number of published studies at a specific time might vary according to different circumstances, such as the dominant manufacturing technology of each period.

4. Discussion

The main focus of this study was to categorize the critical factors that impact AMT implementation based on specific dimensions: education, planning, top management know-how, technical know-how, business, economic impact, regulations, and social impact. Below, we discuss each category in relation to AMT adoption and implementation, as represented in Figure 4.
Education and training play a crucial role in advancing the manufacturing process, particularly in complex sectors that require the establishment of global education and training centers [8]. Access to appropriate training and education enables any economy to compete in the industrial field effectively. Education is essential not only for familiarizing workers with industrial technology but also for overall development [9]. Training also helps overcome barriers between workers and technology, leading to maximum productivity [10]. Moreover, education lays the foundation for the fundamental skills and knowledge required to operate AMT [11]. Additionally, research and development are vital for the effective implementation and adoption of AMT. Continuous innovation in technology through research and development ensures the ongoing improvement of AMT's effectiveness. Table 4 presents the critical factors of AMT implementation from an educational perspective.
Successful implementation of advanced manufacturing technology requires careful planning. Developing workable and reliable plans, as well as focusing on specific areas of AMT execution to maintain competitive advantages, represent the most challenging phase of the planning process [4]. In addition to having a suitable operational strategy, selecting an AMT that aligns with short- and long-term operational goals is crucial [43]. Proper planning is necessary to choose and implement the appropriate AMT, considering its integration with other essential elements such as operational, manufacturing, and business strategies. Selecting the right manufacturing technology is essential to ensure that businesses benefit from the continually evolving technological landscape [11]. The manufacturing strategy plays a significant role in selecting the appropriate AMT at the right time and continuously updating the plan to incorporate new technologies [44]. Additionally, the success or failure of AMT implementation efforts heavily relies on the business strategy [45]. Therefore, the planning timeline is a crucial consideration during the AMT selection process and can indicate the success of the procedure [46]. Table 5 showcases the critical factors of AMT implementation from a planning perspective.
The adoption of advanced industrial technology is highly dependent on effective management approaches [64]. Thus, top management plays a pivotal role in the adoption and implementation of AMT, as it ensures the internal alignment necessary to achieve this goal. Implementing AMT can be risky if management lacks fundamental knowledge of manufacturing technology [64]. Organizational design is equally crucial to the success of AMT adoption, as it provides the necessary flexibility to accommodate new technologies [36]. Implementing new AMT requires a transaction process that carries risks for the organization, necessitating an adequate organizational structure to manage any changes [47]. It is the responsibility of top management to maintain a positive organizational culture during the changes resulting from AMT implementation [9]. Management support and commitment are crucial when adopting AMT [65]. Integrating various managerial aspects is necessary to ensure successful AMT adoption and implementation [12]. Likewise, the management's dedication and discipline will inspire workers throughout the organization to complete tasks correctly each time they interact with AMT [66]. Table 6 shows critical factors of AMT implementation from a management perspective.
Improved performance is often driven by a strong technological capacity, which motivates organizations to continually enhance their technical skills. During the AMT selection phase, it is crucial to assess the organization's workforce capabilities and their ability to manage modern technology effectively [12]. Therefore, the technical strategy must address all technical aspects of implementation while identifying the necessary technological prerequisites for AMT approval [67]. Additionally, conducting a technical justification is crucial in evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of AMT during the selection process [79]. Collaboration between the AMT supplier and user at the early stages of implementation can also play a crucial role [56]. Furthermore, creating a knowledge base that outlines the required technical qualifications and abilities of workers operating the implemented AMT is essential [11]. Reliability, productivity, flexibility, and monitoring are further critical technical attributes for successful AMT implementation. Table 7 presents the critical factors of AMT implementation from a technical perspective.
The implementation of AMT is a crucial element that helps manufacturing organizations worldwide in reducing manufacturing costs, improving output quality, and enhancing desired results and production flexibility. When implementing new manufacturing technology, organizations are primarily driven by the potential financial gains, which has led to the widespread adoption and growth of AMT in recent decades, contributing to the stability and expansion of the technology itself [51]. However, organizations also face the challenge of producing more with fewer resources while improving their products and bringing them to market faster than competitors through AMT implementation [87]. From a business perspective, the availability of financial resources directly influences AMT implementation [67]. Additionally, product feasibility and investment justification are critical factors in the decision-making process for AMT adoption and implementation. Similarly, cost allocation is a major objective pursued by industrial organizations through AMT implementation, as it aligns with resource allocation [82]. Table 8 illustrates the critical factors of AMT implementation from a business perspective.
Advanced industry plays a vital role in driving significant economic growth for nations. When it comes to adopting and implementing AMT processes, the economic situation can act as either a driver or a barrier [25]. Therefore, the implementation of AMT should be oriented towards maximizing economic benefits through proper economic justification [79]. However, realizing the economic advantages of AMT adoption and implementation requires government support [5]. The collaboration between the government and the private sector contributes to the development of thriving economic and industrial infrastructure, which is advantageous for AMT adoption in these countries [39]. Additionally, the availability of an ecosystem and resources is critical for enabling both local and international competitive advantages of AMT. Table 9 illustrates the critical factors of AMT implementation from a technical perspective.
The effectiveness of any technological advancement is primarily evaluated through human-technology interaction. It is crucial to consider social impact as it can either hinder or facilitate industrial changes related to manufacturing technologies [76]. In terms of social impact, worker resistance is a critical factor influencing AMT implementation [4]. Workers tend to resist any modifications that reduce the reliance on human labor in the industrial process [105]. On the other hand, the user-supplier relationship plays a key role in the successful implementation of AMT [69]. To avoid conflicts between technological and human components of the manufacturing process, human resources development must align with the adopted AMT [56]. Furthermore, worker behavior towards these manufacturing technologies influences social conformity [92]. Table 10 outlines the critical factors of AMT implementation from a social perspective.
To maintain a healthy industrial environment, a set of rules and regulations must govern industrial activities and provide necessary adjustments. Governments and their agencies are responsible for creating and revising these laws and regulations. The success of AMT adoption is influenced by regulations that foster an environment conducive to achieving the goals of manufacturing technology [7]. Therefore, governments have the responsibility of establishing a solid foundation of laws and rules that encourage the adoption and implementation of AMT. Government agencies play a crucial role in establishing regulations and laws related to AMT implementation [15]. It is essential for government and organizational regulations to align with each other. Additionally, environmental regulations have become a global concern and influence the adoption and implementation of AMT (González-Torre, Alvarez et al. 2010). Table 11 presents the critical factors of AMT implementation from a regulatory perspective.
As for the limitations of this systematic review, we acknowledge that not all studies relevant to our evaluation may have been included in this review. Despite using closely relevant keywords during the scanning phase, the limited number of keywords used might have hindered the identification of specific appropriate papers. Furthermore, the language restriction may have resulted in the omission of relevant studies published in other languages. Additionally, certain relevant studies may have been overlooked during the screening stage due to the databases not indexing every relevant study or the search terms being too specific. Moreover, inconsistencies in the applied inclusion criteria could limit the conclusions drawn from the review of studies. Finally, the availability of specific bibliographic databases might restrict the scope of finding records.

5. Conclusions

The adoption and implementation of AMT are complex endeavors, regardless of the beliefs of organizations and governments. Implementing AMT carries inherent risks due to its sensitive nature. It is crucial to identify and regulate the critical factors associated with its implementation to ensure successful deployment. Therefore, highlighting the critical factors of AMT from different dimensions is essential to provide decision-makers with a comprehensive understanding of potential issues that may hinder successful implementation. Categorizing critical implementation factors into different dimensions can help identify the root causes of obstacles and address them at the early stages. Furthermore, considering these critical factors before implementation can help reveal and address implementation-related challenges. Therefore, conducting an in-depth review of prior studies on AMT implementation is an effective way to assess the impact of critical factors. Additionally, we recommend that researchers adopt a broader perspective that encompasses the integration and interaction between critical factors in each category and their impact on AMT implementation.

Author Contributions

AAF conducted the literature search and prepared the initial draft of the paper. WK conceived the study conception and supervised all aspects of manuscript preparations, revisions, editing, and final intellectual content.

Funding

This research received no external funding

References

  1. Chung, W.; Swink, M. Patterns of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Utilization and Manufacturing Capabilities. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2009, 18, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, I.; Small, M. Implementing advanced manufacturing technology: An integrated planning model. Omega 1994, 22, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Raj, T.; Shankar, R.; Suhaib, M. A review of some issues and identification of some barriers in the implementation of FMS. Int. J. Flex. Manuf. Syst. 2007, 19, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Millen, R.; Sohal, A.S. Planning processes for advanced manufacturing technology by large American manufacturers. Technovation 1998, 18, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Löfsten, H. and P. Lindelöf (2002). "Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms—academic-industry links, innovation and markets." Research policy 31(6): 859-876. [CrossRef]
  6. Chan, F.; Chan, M.; Lau, H.; Ip, R. Investment appraisal techniques for advanced manufacturing technology (AMT): a literature review. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 2001, 12, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gertler, M.S. "Being There": Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies. Econ. Geogr. 1995, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Small, M.H.; Yasin, M.M. Advanced manufacturing technology: Implementation policy and performance. J. Oper. Manag. 1997, 15, 349–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Udoka, S.J.; Nazemetz, J.W. An empirically based analysis of the requirements for successful implementation of advanced manufacturing technology (AMT). Comput. Ind. Eng. 1990, 19, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lyu, J.; Gunasekaran, A. Implementation of advanced manufacturing technology through industry-government-university co-operation in Taiwan. Comput. Ind. 1993, 22, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kumar, R.; Singh, H.; Chandel, R. Exploring the key success factors of advanced manufacturing technology implementation in Indian manufacturing industry. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2018, 29, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. 12. Chan, F., et al. (2015). Barriers to advanced manufacturing technology in small-medium enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia. 2015 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET), IEEE.
  13. Yu, N., et al. (2011). "Drivers and barriers for implementing advanced manufacturing technology in China's furniture industry: An exploratory study." Forest Products Journal 61(1): 83-91. [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, H. and J. Khamba (2009). "Evolving the barriers for enhancing the utilization level of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMTs) in Indian manufacturing industry." International Journal of Advanced Operations Management 1(2-3): 135-150. [CrossRef]
  15. Efstathiades, A.; A Tassou, S.; Oxinos, G.; Antoniou, A. Advanced manufacturing technology transfer and implementation in developing countries: The case of the Cypriot manufacturing industry. Technovation 2000, 20, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, H.; Co, H.C. Adoption and implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Singapore. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 1997, 48, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marri, H. B., et al. (2007). "Implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Pakistani small and medium enterprises: an empirical analysis." Journal of Enterprise Information Management 20(6): 726-739.
  18. Castrillón, I.D.; Cantorna, A.I.S. The effect of the implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies on training in the manufacturing sector. J. Eur. Ind. Train. 2005, 29, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sanchez, A.M. Adopting advanced manufacturing technologies: Experience from Spain. J. Manuf. Syst. 1996, 15, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stock, G. N. and C. M. McDermott (2000). "Implementing advanced manufacturing technology: The role of organizational culture." Production & Inventory Management Journal 41(3): 66-66. [CrossRef]
  21. Singh, H.; Khamba, J. An empirical examination for enhancing the utilization level of advanced manufacturing technologies in India. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 2010, 7, 112–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Singh, H. and J. Khamba (2010). "Research Methodology for Effective Utilization of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies in Northern India Manufacturing Industry." IUP Journal of Operations Management 9.
  23. Small, M.H.; Yasin, M.M. Developing a framework for the effective planning and implementation of advanced manufacturing technology. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 1997, 17, 468–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lewis, M.; Åhlström, P.; Yalabik, B.; Mårtensson, P. Implementing advanced service technology in the public sector: an exploratory study of the relevance and limitations of insights from private sector manufacturing technology implementation. Prod. Plan. Control. 2012, 24, 916–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saberi, S.; Yusuff, R.M. Neural network application in predicting advanced manufacturing technology implementation performance. Neural Comput. Appl. 2010, 21, 1191–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Efstathiades, A.; Tassou, S.; Antoniou, A. Strategic planning, transfer and implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMT). Development of an integrated process plan. Technovation 2002, 22, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hofmann, C.; Orr, S. Advanced manufacturing technology adoption—the German experience. Technovation 2005, 25, 711–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thomas, A.J.; A Barton, R. Characterizing SME migration towards advanced manufacturing technologies. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 2011, 226, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Narkhede, B. E. (2017). "Advance manufacturing strategy and firm performance: An empirical study in a developing environment of small-and medium-sized firms." Benchmarking: An International Journal 24(1): 62-101.
  30. Shani, A. (.; Grant, R.M.; Krishnan, R.; Thompson, E. Advanced Manufacturing Systems and Organizational Choice: Sociotechnical System Approach. Calif. Manag. Rev. 1992, 34, 91–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pao-Long, C. and S. S. Lung (2002). "Organizational changes for advanced manufacturing technology infusion: An empirical study." International Journal of Management 19(2): 206.
  32. Tesar, A. (1995). Advanced manufacturing: Technology and international competitiveness, Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States).
  33. Khorsheed, M.S.; A Al-Fawzan, M. Fostering university–industry collaboration in Saudi Arabia through technology innovation centers. Innovation 2014, 16, 224–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yu, N., et al. (2011). "Drivers and barriers for implementing advanced manufacturing technology in China's furniture industry: An exploratory study." Forest Products Journal 61(1): 83-91. [CrossRef]
  35. Bessant, J. The integration barrier; problems in the implementation of advanced manufacturing technology. Robotica 1985, 3, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rhodes, E. and D. Wield (1994). Implementing new technologies: innovation and the management of technology, Wiley Blackwell.
  37. Dimnik, T.; Johnston, D. Manufacturing managers and the adoption of advanced manufacturing technology. Omega 1993, 21, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, H., et al. (2001). "Evaluating advanced manufacturing technology in Chinese state-owned enterprises: a survey and case studies." The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 18(7): 528-536. [CrossRef]
  39. Swamidass, P.M.; Winch, G.W. Exploratory study of the adoption of manufacturing technology innovations in the USA and the UK. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2002, 40, 2677–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Putterill, M.; Maguire, W.; Sohal, A.S. Advanced manufacturing technology investment: criteria for organizational choice and appraisal. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 1996, 7, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kapitsyn, V.M.; Gerasimenko, O.A.; Andronova, L.N. Analysis of the status and trends of applications of advanced manufacturing technologies in Russia. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 2017, 28, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bourke, J., & Roper, S. (2016). AMT adoption and innovation: An investigation of dynamic and complementary effects. Technovation, 55, 42-55. [CrossRef]
  43. Saberi, S.; Yusu, R.M.; Zulkifli, N.; Ahma, M.M. Effective Factors on Advanced Manufacturing Technology Implementation Performance: A Review. J. Appl. Sci. 2010, 10, 1229–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cardoso, R.d.R.; de Lima, E.P.; da Costa, S.E.G. Identifying organizational requirements for the implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMT). J. Manuf. Syst. 2012, 31, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chang, T.-H.; Wang, T.-C. Measuring the success possibility of implementing advanced manufacturing technology by utilizing the consistent fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 4313–4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, I. J. and M. H. Small (1996). "Planning for advanced manufacturing technology: a research framework." International Journal of Operations & Production Management 16(5): 4-24.
  47. da Costa, S.G.; de Lima, E.P. Advanced manufacturing technology adoption: an integrated approach. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2008, 20, 74–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dangayach, G. and S. Deshmukh (2005). "Advanced manufacturing technology implementation: evidence from Indian small and medium enterprises (SMEs)." Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 16(5): 483-496.
  49. Osola, J. Advanced manufacturing technology—the challenge. Comput. Eng. J. 1986, 3, 75–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Eid, R. (2009). "Factors affecting the success of world class manufacturing implementation in less developed countries: The case of Egypt." Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 20(7): 989-1008. [CrossRef]
  51. Chung, K. Deriving advantages from advanced manufacturing technology — an organizing paradigm. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 1991, 25, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Teoi, A.Y.; Anholon, R.; da Silva, D.; Quelhas, O.L.G. Critical factors for the dimensional management system (DMS) implementation in manufacturing industries. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 88, 1053–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sambasivarao, K. and S. Deshmukh (1995). "Selection and implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies: classification and literature review of issues." International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15(10): 43-62.
  54. Park, Y.-T. National systems of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT): hierarchical classification scheme and policy formulation process. Technovation 2000, 20, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sohal, A.S. A longitudinal study of planning and implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 1997, 10, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Suwannapirom, S. and S. Lertputtarak (2008). "Across the boundary of advanced manufacturing technology transfer in auto-parts industry in Thailand." Universitatii Bucuresti. Analele. Seria Stiinte Economice si Administrative 2: 113.
  57. Percival, J.C. Complementarities Between Advanced Manufacturing Technologies. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2009, 56, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hynek, J., et al. (2009). "Problems associated with investment in advanced manufacturing technology from the management point of view." WSEAS Transactions on Systems 8(6): 753-762.
  59. Banakar, Z. and F. Tahriri (2010). "Justification and classification of issues for the selection and implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies." World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 65: 341-349.
  60. Sharma, A.; Dangayach, G.; Pathak, S. Implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies: experiences of Indian manufacturing companies. Int. J. Bus. Syst. Res. 2008, 2, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sohal Amrik, S. (1992). "Implementing Advanced Manufacturing Technology: Factors Critical to Success." Logistics Information Management 5(1): 39-46.
  62. Storto, C.L. A double-DEA framework to support decision-making in the choice of advanced manufacturing technologies. Manag. Decis. 2018, 56, 488–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Teng, K. L. L. and A. Seetharaman (2003). "Towards a better manufacturing sector: a perspective on the implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Malaysia." International Journal of Management 20(4): 490.
  64. Leonard-Barton, D.; Deschamps, I. Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology. Manag. Sci. 1988, 34, 1252–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lewis, M.; Åhlström, P.; Yalabik, B.; Mårtensson, P. Implementing advanced service technology in the public sector: an exploratory study of the relevance and limitations of insights from private sector manufacturing technology implementation. Prod. Plan. Control. 2012, 24, 916–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Beatty, C. Implementing advanced manufacturing technologies: Rules of the road. Long Range Plan. 1993, 26, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dawson, P. Advanced technology design, people and organization: experience of Australian industrial collaboration. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 1996, 7, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zammuto, R. F. and E. J. O'Connor (1992). "Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies' benefits: The roles of organization design and culture." Academy of Management Review 17(4): 701-728. [CrossRef]
  69. Hayes, R.H.; Jaikumar, R. Requirements for successful implementation of new manufacturing technologies. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 1991, 7, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gupta, A.; Chen, I.; Chiang, D. Determining organizational structure choices in advanced manufacturing technology management. Omega 1997, 25, 511–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. McDermott, C.M.; Stock, G.N. Organizational culture and advanced manufacturing technology implementation. J. Oper. Manag. 1999, 17, 521–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chung, C.A. Human issues influencing the successful implementation of advanced manufacturing technology. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 1996, 13, 283–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Beaumont, N. , et al. (2002). "Do foreign-owned firms manage advanced manufacturing technology better?" International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22(7): 759-771.
  74. Gupta, A.; Prinzinger, J.; Messerschmidt, D.C. Role of organizational commitment in advanced manufacturing technology and performance relationship. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 1998, 9, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sukathong, S.; Suksawang, P.; Naenna, T. Analyzing the importance of critical success factors for the adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 2021, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gupta, Y.P. ; Yakimchuk Impact of advanced manufacturing technology on industrial relations: A comparative study. Eng. Manag. Int. 1989, 5, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. González-Torre, P.; Álvarez, M.; Sarkis, J.; Adenso-Díaz, B. Barriers to the Implementation of Environmentally Oriented Reverse Logistics: Evidence from the Automotive Industry Sector. Br. J. Manag. 2010, 21, 889–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Small, M.H.; Yasin, M. Advanced manufacturing technology adoption and performance: the role of management information systems departments. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 2003, 14, 409–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Son, Y.K. A Comprehensive Bibliography on Justification of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies. Eng. Econ. 1992, 38, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. du Preez, W. B. and D. J. De Beer (2015). "Implementing the South African additive manufacturing technology roadmap-the role of an additive manufacturing centre of competence." South African Journal of Industrial Engineering 26(2): 85-92. [CrossRef]
  81. Ghobakhloo, M. Determinants of information and digital technology implementation for smart manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 58, 2384–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Udo, G. J. and I. C. Ehie (1996). "Advanced manufacturing technologies: Determinants of implementation success." International Journal of Operations & Production Management 16(12): 6-26.
  83. Youssef, M.A.; Zairi, M. Benchmarking supplier partnerships in the context of advanced manufacturing technology implementation. Benchmarking Qual. Manag. Technol. 1996, 3, 4–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zairi, M. Supplier partnerships for effective advanced manufacturing technology implementation: a proposed model. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 1998, 9, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Alvarado, A. (2013). "Problems in the implementation process of advanced manufacturing technologies." The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 64(1-4): 123-131. [CrossRef]
  86. Co, H. C., et al. (1998). "The human factor in advanced manufacturing technology adoption: an empirical analysis." International Journal of Operations & Production Management 18(1): 87-106.
  87. Khan, A. and K. Nasser (2016). "Advanced manufacturing technologies for smart and competitive businesses." IUP Journal of Operations Management 15(3): 7.
  88. Szalavetz, A. The Environmental Impact of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies: Examples from Hungary. Central Eur. Bus. Rev. 2017, 6, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Singh, H. and J. Khamba (2008). "Evaluating the Barriers for Enhancing the Utilization Level of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMTs) in Indian Manufacturing Industry." training 4: 22.
  90. Brandyberry, A.; Rai, A.; White, G.P. Intermediate Performance Impacts of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Systems: An Empirical Investigation*. Decis. Sci. 1999, 30, 993–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jonsson, P. (2000). "An empirical taxonomy of advanced manufacturing technology." International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20(12): 1446-1474. [CrossRef]
  92. Wall, T.D.; Corbett, J.M.; Clegg, C.W.; Jackson, P.R.; Martin, R. Advanced manufacturing technology and work design: Towards a theoretical framework. J. Organ. Behav. 1990, 11, 201–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lu, Y., & Cecil, J. (2016). An Internet of Things (IoT)-based collaborative framework for advanced manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 84, 1141-1152.
  94. Hottenstein, M.P.; Dean, J.W. Managing Risk in Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Calif. Manag. Rev. 1992, 34, 112–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Deshpande, A. (2018). "Relationships between advanced manufacturing technologies, absorptive capacity, mass customization, time to market and financial and market performance: An empirical investigation." Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration 10(1): 2-20.
  96. Teng, K. L. L. and A. Seetharaman (2004). "The selection and management of cost justification techniques among advanced manufacturing technology companies in Malaysia." International Journal of Management 21(1): 45.
  97. Ghobakhloo, M.; Azar, A. Business excellence via advanced manufacturing technology and lean-agile manufacturing. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2018, 29, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Small, M.H. Planning, justifying and installing advanced manufacturing technology: a managerial framework. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2007, 18, 513–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nyori, G. M., & Ogola, J. M. (2015). Advanced manufacturing technology adoption in manufacturing companies in Kenya.
  100. Cheng, Y.; Matthiesen, R.; Farooq, S.; Johansen, J.; Hu, H.; Ma, L. The evolution of investment patterns on advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) in manufacturing operations: A longitudinal analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 203, 239–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Saliba, M. A., et al. (2017). "A study on the use of advanced manufacturing technologies by manufacturing firms in a small, geographically isolated, developed economy: the case of Malta." The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 89(9-12): 3691-3707. [CrossRef]
  102. Dean Jr, J. W., et al. (1990). "Technical, economic and political factors in advanced manufacturing technology implementation." Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 7(2): 129-144. [CrossRef]
  103. Reynolds, E.B.; Uygun, Y. Strengthening advanced manufacturing innovation ecosystems: The case of Massachusetts. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 136, 178–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ranjan, S.; Jha, V.K.; Pal, P. Application of emerging technologies in ERP implementation in Indian manufacturing enterprises: an exploratory analysis of strategic benefits. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 88, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. (Majchrzak, A. (1988). The human side of factory automation: Managerial and human resource strategies for making automation succeed, Jossey-Bass.
  106. Abd Rahman, A. and D. Bennett (2009). "Advanced manufacturing technology adoption in developing countries: The role of buyer-supplier relationships." Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 20(8): 1099-1118. [CrossRef]
  107. Siegel, D.; Waldman, D.; Youngdahl, W. The adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies: human resource management implications. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 1997, 44, 288–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Nkuika, G.L.F.N.; Yiqun, X. Quantitative Evaluation and Optimization Path of Advanced Manufacturing Development Policy Based on the PMC–AE Index Model. Int. J. Glob. Bus. Competitiveness 2022, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kong, T.; Feng, T.; Ye, C. Advanced Manufacturing Technologies and Green Innovation: The Role of Internal Environmental Collaboration. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jin, M.; Tang, R.; Ji, Y.; Liu, F.; Gao, L.; Huisingh, D. Impact of advanced manufacturing on sustainability: An overview of the special volume on advanced manufacturing for sustainability and low fossil carbon emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 161, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Preprints 76177 g002
Figure 2. Distribution of studies among categories.
Figure 2. Distribution of studies among categories.
Preprints 76177 g002
Preprints 76177 g003
Figure 3. Temporal distribution of studies.
Figure 3. Temporal distribution of studies.
Preprints 76177 g003
Preprints 76177 g004
Figure 4. Classification of critical factors in included papers.
Figure 4. Classification of critical factors in included papers.
Preprints 76177 g004
Table 1. Systematic review search, keywords, and results.
Table 1. Systematic review search, keywords, and results.
Search Phase ProQuest Compendex Google Scholar Total
All articles contain at least one of the following keywords in their abstract or title: AMT AND Critical factors, AMT AND Challenges, AMT AND Barriers, AMT AND Adoption, and AMT AND Implementation. 1,282 864 1,822
All articles contain at least one of the additional keywords in their abstract or title: country, economy, company, organization, sector, and industry. 206 127 346
All articles with substantively relevant text (fit for purpose) 122 104 231
All articles with effectively relevant text (fit for purpose) 41 33 35 109
Table 2. Number of studies per category.
Table 2. Number of studies per category.
Category Number of studies Percentage
Education 5 5%
Planning 6 6%
Management 32 29%
Technology 13 12%
Business 12 11%
Economy 13 12%
Regulations 5 5%
Social 10 9%
Mix 13 12%
Total 109
Table 3. Number of studies per Country.
Table 3. Number of studies per Country.
Country Number of studies
Australia 3
Brazil 3
Canada 3
China 3
Cyprus 2
Czech Republic 1
Egypt 1
Germany 1
Hong Kong 2
Hungary 1
India 11
Iran 2
Italy 1
Kenya 1
Malaysia 7
Malta 1
Mexico 1
New Zealand 1
Pakistan 2
Russia 1
Saudi Arabia 3
Singapore 3
South Africa 1
South Korea 1
Spain 3
Sweden 3
Taiwan 3
Thailand 3
UK 8
USA 34
Table 4. Critical factors of the education dimension.
Table 4. Critical factors of the education dimension.
Critical Factor References
Training programs [6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]
Research and development [12,14,17,18,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]
Innovation [3,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]
Educational institutions involvement [10,33]
Table 5. Critical factors of the planning dimension.
Table 5. Critical factors of the planning dimension.
Critical Factor References
Selection Plan [2,4,6,16,23,26,35,43,44,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]
Manufacturing Strategy [2,9,11,36,43,44,51,53,54,55,56,57]
Business Strategy [2,23,40,45,49,50,51,55,58,59,60,61]
Planning Timeframe [4,12,23,46,47,62]
Overall Justification [2,4,12,44,58,63]
Table 6. Critical factors of the management dimension.
Table 6. Critical factors of the management dimension.
Critical Factor References
Organizational Design [11,24,36,47,63,67,68]
Organizational Structure [11,12,13,16,22,31,44,47,64,69,70]
Organizational Culture [9,13,17,20,25,58,68,71]
Management Support [2,3,9,16,17,19,24,28,50,52,55,56,59,61,64,67,69,71,72,73,74,75,85]
Integration [12,59,66,76]
Information System [9,29,30,38,77,78]
Table 7. Critical factors of the technical dimension.
Table 7. Critical factors of the technical dimension.
Critical Factor References
Technological Capability [1,3,9,12,23,35,50,67]
Technical Justification [2,22,24,25,43,49,59,62,63,79,80,81]
Supplier Technical Support [12,15,45,56,67,73,82,83,84]
Reliability [2,3,9,16,17,19,24,28,50,52,55,56,59,61,64,67,69,71,72,73,74,75,85]
Productivity [13,37,51,58,59,63,72,86,87,88]
Flexibility [2,14,18,22,23,26,59,71,72,76,86,89,90]
Monitoring [2,23,25,26,29,38,43,60,62,69,70,74,90,91,92,93,98]
Table 8. Critical factors of the business dimension.
Table 8. Critical factors of the business dimension.
Critical Factor References
Market Competitiveness [9,26,27,32,37,48,49,55,58,59,60,71,87,90,94,95,96,97]
Financial Resources Availability [12,16,38,48,56,67]
Products Feasibility [3,4,39,44,48,49,62,82,95,96]
Investment Justification [5,6,39,44,55,58,63,67,69,85,96,98,99,100]
Cost Allocation [3,12,13,53,58,77,82,96]
Table 9. Critical factors of the economic dimension.
Table 9. Critical factors of the economic dimension.
Critical Factor References
Economic Feasibility [25,32,63,79,80,101]
Government Support [5,10,12,32,101,102]
Infrastructure Availability [5,12,14,15,22,39,43,46,53,54,85,91]
Resources Availability [5,17,60,85,88,102]
Ecosystem Availability [39,50,60,67,80,103,104]
Table 10. Critical factors of the social dimension.
Table 10. Critical factors of the social dimension.
Critical Factor References
Workers Resistance [3,4,9,12,13,14,17,43,44,45,55,66,72,76,105]
User–Supplier Relationship [7,9,15,26,45,46,61,67,69,73,83,84,85,106]
Human Resources Development [11,15,17,18,22,25,43,56,59,61,67,72,98,107]
Social Conformity [3,59,71,76,92,102,105]
Table 11. Critical factors of the regulation dimension.
Table 11. Critical factors of the regulation dimension.
Critical Factor References
Governmental Policies [7,23,54,59,108]
Organizational Policies [7,15,23,26,54,56]
Environmental Regulations [5,77,109,110]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated