Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

M1/M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors Control Long-Term, but Not Short-Term Plasticity at the Mossy Fiber – CA3 Pyramidal Cell Synapse in Mouse Hippocampus

Altmetrics

Downloads

304

Views

58

Comments

1

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

This version is not peer-reviewed

Submitted:

13 July 2023

Posted:

14 July 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are well-known for their crucial involvement in hippocampus-dependent learning and memory, but the exact roles of the various receptor subtypes (M1-M5) are still not fully understood. Here, we studied how M1 and M3 receptors affect plasticity at the mossy fiber (MF)-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse. In hippocampal slices from M1/M3 receptor double knockout (M1/M3-dKO) mice, the signature short-term plasticity of the MF-CA3 synapse was not significantly affected. However, the rather unique, NMDA receptor-independent and presynaptic form of long-term potentiation (LTP) of this synapse was much larger in M1/M3-deficient slices compared to wild type slices, in both field potential and whole-cell recordings. Consistent with its presynaptic origin, induction of MF-LTP strongly enhanced the excitatory drive onto single CA3 pyramidal cells, with the effect being more pronounced in M1/M3-dKO cells. In an earlier study [1], we found that deletion of M2 receptors in mice disinhibits MF-LTP in a similar fashion, suggesting that endogenous acetylcholine employs both M1/M3 and M2 receptors to constrain MF-LTP. Importantly, such synergism was not observed for MF long-term depression (LTD). Low-frequency stimulation, which reliably induced LTD of MF synapses in control slices, failed to do so in M1/M3-dKO slices and gave rise to LTP instead. In striking contrast, loss of M2 augmented LTD when compared to control slices. Taken together, our data demonstrate convergence of M1/M3 and M2 receptors on MF-LTP, but functional divergence on MF-LTD, the net effect being well-balanced bidirectional plasticity of the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Neuroscience and Neurology

1. Introduction

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) have been long recognized as essential players in cognitive functions [2,3,4,5,6], yet the particular roles of the five mAChR subtypes (M1-M5) are still not sufficiently resolved. Based on their downstream signaling pathways, mAChRs fall in two groups. The unevenly numbered receptors (M1, M3, M5) couple to Gq/11 (M1-type receptors), whereas the evenly numbered receptors (M2, M4) signal via Gi/o (M2-type receptors) [4,7,8]. In the absence of highly subtype-specific pharmacological tools, the advent of knockout (KO) mice lacking one or two mAChRs substantially advanced the field, enabling a more detailed analysis of muscarinic effects on cognitive performance [9,10,11]. For example, M2-KO, but not M4-KO mice exhibit deficits in hippocampus-dependent learning tasks [12,13,14,15]. Likewise, global and hippocampal-specific deletion of M3 receptors impairs learning and memory [16,17], whereas M1-KO mice show only selective deficits in tasks involving hippocampal-cortical interplay [18,19].
As long-term synaptic plasticity is widely accepted as a neurobiological substrate of learning and memory, an obvious question is whether the cognitive deficits of mAChR-KO mice can be attributed to impaired plasticity at the synaptic level. Indeed, for M2-KO mice, we found a significant decline in NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation (LTP) in the hippocampal slices, both at the Schaffer collateral (SC)-CA1 synapse and the associational/commissural fiber (A/C)-CA3 synapse [1,13]. Less clear effects on LTP at the SC-CA1 synapse were observed in the hippocampal slices from M1- and M3-KO mice. Lack of M3 receptors did not alter LTP [20], whereas lack of M1 receptors led to either normal or reduced LTP, depending on the induction protocol [19,20,21]. Interestingly, we reported earlier that lack of M2 receptors diminished LTP at the A/C-CA3 pyramidal cells (v.s.), enhanced NMDA receptor-independent LTP at the mossy fiber (MF)-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse [1], suggesting that M2 receptors can regulate the strength of the two main projections onto CA3 pyramidal cells in an opposite, input-specific fashion.
Like other excitatory synapses, MF-CA3 synapses undergo long-term depression (LTD) following prolonged low-frequency stimulation (LFS) [22]. LTD is the counterpart of LTP, and its importance for cognitive processes is increasingly appreciated [23,24]. Like LTP, LTD at MF-CA3 synapses is predominantly NMDA receptor-independent and presynaptic in origin [22,25,26]. Since CA3 and dentate gyrus (DG) express appreciable levels of M1 and M3 receptors, but not M5 receptors [2,27,28], we took advantage of M1/M3 double KO (M1/M3-dKO) mice to explore how M1-type receptors shape lasting upward and downward changes in synaptic strength at the MF-CA3 synapse. Our data demonstrate that, in hippocampal slices from M1/M3-dKO mice, LTP is enhanced at the expense of LTD, which is abrogated. By contrast, elimination of M2 receptors augmented both LTP and LTD. Taken together, our data demonstrate that M1- and M2-type receptors regulate LTP and LTD at the MF-CA3 synapse in a synergistic and antagonistic fashion, respectively.

2. Materials and Methods

M1/M3-dKO mice (genetic background 129J1 × CF1) were generated as previously described [29]. In some experiments, homozygous M2 single KO (M2-KO) mice [30] were used for comparison. For each knockout strain, age-matched wild type (wt) mice of the matching genetic background were used in parallel as controls. Mice were housed under standard conditions. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Animal Protection Law of Germany and the European Communities Council Directive of November 1986 /86/609/EEC), and with approval of local Franconian government.
Transverse hippocampal slices (350 µm thick) were prepared from adult male or female mice (3-7 month-old, anesthetized with sevoflurane) and maintained as described previously [1,31]. The slices were then kept in modified artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) containing (in mM) 125 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 3 MgCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3 and 10 d-glucose at room temperature for at least 2 h before being used. Individual slices were transferred to a submerged chamber perfused with normal aCSF with 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 2.5 mM CaCl2 at 31 ± 1 ºC, unless otherwise stated. All solutions were constantly gassed with 95 % O2 - 5 % CO2. Signals were filtered at 2 kHz and sampled at 20 kHz using a Multiclamp 700B amplifier together with Digidata 1440A interface and pClamp10 software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). MiniDigi 1A and AxoScope 10 were used for low-resolution scope recording, sampled at 1 kHz. Drugs and chemicals were obtained from Tocris Bioscience (Bio-techne GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany) and Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Steinheim, Germany).
Whole-cell recordings of visualized CA3 pyramidal cells in dorsal hippocampal slices were performed in voltage-clamp mode with patch pipettes filled with (in mM) 135 K-gluconate, 5 HEPES, 3 MgCl2, 5 EGTA, 2 Na2ATP, 0.3 Na3GTP, 4 NaCl (pH 7.3, adjusted by 1 mM KOH). Cells were held at -70 mV and all potentials were corrected for liquid junction potential (15 mV). Series resistance in whole-cell configuration was 5-20 MΩ and compensated by 60-80%. To monitor the excitatory synaptic drive onto CA3 pyramidal cells, spontaneously occurring excitatory postsynaptic currents (spEPSCs) were collected in the presence of the GABAA-receptor antagonist picrotoxin (100 µM). In some cases, tetrodotoxin (TTX, 1 µM) was introduced to the perfusing solution to block action potential discharge, yielding miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs). To elevate the level of ambient acetylcholine in the slice tissue, acetylcholinesterase activity was inhibited by eserine (10 µM).
Constant-current pulses (width 0.1 ms) were delivered to a bipolar tungsten electrode located in the hilus to activate mossy fiber (MF) projection. The evoked MF EPSCs were monitored at 0.1 Hz. Stimuli were carefully adjusted at low intensities to minimize polysynaptic and/or A/C pathway activation of CA3 pyramidal cells. MF responses were characterized by their prominent feature of strong facilitation during short trains of repetitive stimulation [26]. LTP of MF-CA3 synapses was induced by high-frequency stimulation (HFS) at 100 Hz for 1 s, repeated 3 times at an interval of 10 s. Long-term depression (LTD) of MF EPSCs was induced by low-frequency stimulation (LFS) at 1 Hz for 15 min. The stimulation intensity during LTP/LTD induction protocol was kept consistent with that of individual baseline. As long-term plasticity of A/C synapses is NMDA receptor-dependent, the NMDA receptor antagonist d-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (d-AP5, 50 μM) was present in all experiments on MF synaptic plasticity to prevent contamination from A/C responses. Peak amplitude of evoked EPSC was measured, a threshold of 5 pA was set to define the events as failure or response. Given the highly dynamic amplitudes of evoked MF EPSCs [26,32,33,34], the magnitude of LTP/LTD was expressed as changes in: (i) failure rate, calculated by counting failures among the total events during baseline (pre-tetanus) or post-tetanus (1-20 min), and (ii) averaged peak amplitude of evoked EPSCs (without failure) before and 16-20 min after tetanus. Data were included only when the peak amplitude of evoked EPSCs was reduced > 90% by the group II metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist DCG IV (2.5 μM) at the end of the experiment.
MF-LTP experiments were also performed using extracellular recording in CA3 stratum lucidum, with aCSF containing high divalent ion concentration (4 mM CaCl2 and 4 mM MgCl2) to reduce polysynaptic recruitment contamination [32,33,34]. The recording pipette for field postsynaptic potentials (fPSPs) was filled with modified aCSF, in which NaHCO3 was replaced by HEPES to avoid pH change. LTP of CA3 MF fPSPs was induced by tetanic stimulation at 25 Hz for 5 s, in the presence of d-AP5 (50 µM) [31].
Data analysis was performed off-line with Clampfit 10.6 (Molecular Devices, CA, USA). Peak amplitudes of evoked MF-responses were measured and averaged over 30 s (for fPSPs) or 60 s (for EPSCs). Spontaneous events were detected using an automated event detection algorithm with an amplitude threshold set as 4* σnoise. In addition to the frequency of synaptic inputs, the amplitude and the kinetics of sp/mEPSCs were measured from averaged events, which were selected only if no other event occurred during rise and decay. Rise time was measured from 10% to 90% of the peak response. The decay of averaged currents was fitted with single exponential functions using the Levenberg-Marquardt nonlinear least-squares algorithm. Tau reflects the time required for spontaneous events to decay to 37% of its peak value.
Data were expressed as means ± SEM. Origin Pro 2018G (Origin Lab Corporation, MA, USA) was used for statistics and figures. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normality of data distribution, and the null hypothesis was accepted when P-value was larger than 0.05. Statistical comparisons were performed using unpaired or paired Student’s t-test, one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test, as appropriate. Significance was assumed for P < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. M1/M3 double KO reduces excitatory synaptic drive onto CA3 pyramidal cells

Firstly, we examined whether genetic disruption of M1/M3 receptors affects basal excitatory neurotransmission in the CA3 region using whole-cell recordings of pharmacologically isolated EPSCs from CA3 pyramidal cells voltage-clamped at -70 mV. As illustrated in Figure 1A, spontaneously occurring EPSCs (spEPSCs) in control slices exhibited a frequency of 4.49 ± 0.53 Hz (n = 24 from 10 wt mice; Figure 1B), with an averaged peak amplitude of 44.49 ± 3.38 pA (Figure 1C). M1/M3-dKO led to a significant reduction in both frequency (n = 34 from 13 mice, 3.30 ± 0.31 Hz; p = 0.042) and peak amplitude (32.51 ± 1.87 pA; p = 0.004) of spEPSCs, whereas spEPSC kinetics remained unchanged (Figure 1A–C). Thus, loss of M1/M3 receptors brought about a strong attenuation of the overall excitatory synaptic drive onto CA3 pyramidal cells. Notably, the remarkable change in synaptic input in our mutant preparations was not accompanied by significant alterations in intrinsic electrophysiological properties of the CA3 pyramidal cells (wt, n = 24; M1/M3-dKO, n = 34), such as input resistance (wt, 256.46 ± 21.24 MΩ vs M1/M3-dKO, 236.47 ± 17.62 MΩ, p = 0.471) and membrane capacitance (wt, 109.04 ± 5.36 pF vs. M1/M3-dKO, 97.62 ± 3.59 pF, p = 0.071).
We next used TTX (1 µM) to silence network activity and abrogate firing-driven glutamate release. Under this condition, we observed a pronounced decrease in the frequency of the remaining miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs) in wt CA3 pyramidal cells compared to the frequency of spEPSCs before TTX was added to the bathing solution (n = 5, from 4.89 ± 1.17 Hz spEPSC to 2.11 ± 0.53 Hz mEPSCs; paired t-test, p = 0.016). To elucidate the effect of ambient acetylcholine on mEPSCs frequency and the role of M1/M3 receptors therein, we performed recordings with the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor eserine (10 µM) and the M2-type-preferring antagonist gallamine (20 µM) [35,36] in the bath, in addition to TTX and GABAA receptor antagonist picrotoxin. We also included the GABAB receptor antagonist CGP 55845 (1 µM) to rule out putative indirect effects of GABAB receptors at the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse [37]. Application of eserine for 1-3 min enhanced both mEPSC frequency (n = 6, from 2.75 ± 0.50 Hz to 4.66 ± 1.01 Hz, paired t-test, p = 0.020; i.e., 163.70 ±10.79 % of control) and peak amplitude (from 43.47 ± 4.73 pA to 48.32 ± 3.68 pA, paired t-test, p = 0.049) (Figure 1D–F), without changes in mEPSC kinetics (10-90% rise time: 0.86 ± 0.04 ms vs. 0.88 ± 0.04, paired t-test, p = 0.540; decay tau: 5.02 ± 0.39 ms vs. 5.32 ± 0.24 ms, paired t-test, p = 0.139). As illustrated in Figure 1D, the eserine-induced enhancement of mEPSCs was reversible upon wash-out (2.60 ± 0.58 Hz, p = 0.507 vs. values before eserine). To examine whether the facilitation of synaptic transmission following the eserine-induced elevation of ambient acetylcholine levels is mediated solely by M1-type receptors, we further added the nonselective nicotinic AChR (nAChR) antagonist mecamylamine (10 µM) [38] to the above cocktail of blockers. With nAChRs suppressed, eserine still caused a significant enhancement of mEPSC frequency (n = 7; from 2.80 ± 0.57 Hz to 3.48 ± 0.74 Hz, paired t-test, p = 0.009) and peak amplitude (from 38.86 ± 2.22 pA to 43.56 ± 2.65 pA, paired t-test, p = 0.029) (Figure 1E,F), without a change in mEPSC kinetics. However, since the relative increase in mEPSC frequency in the presence of mecamylamine amounted to only 123.51 ± 3.00 % of control), which was significantly lower than in the absence of this inhibitor (p = 0.003), M1-type receptors and nicotinic receptors appear to jointly promote firing-independent vesicular glutamate release.

3.2. M1/M3-dKO facilitates LTP of mossy fiber-CA3 synapses

Whereas the above recordings provided new information regarding the overall impact of M1-type receptors on the spontaneous excitatory drive experienced by CA3 pyramidal cells, they did not differentiate the synaptic events with respect to their origin, be it mossy fibers, A/C fibers or perforant path. To focus on the MF input and examine how its rather unique plastic changes are modulated by mAChR subtypes, we placed a stimulation electrode into the MF pathway and monitored evoked EPSCs by means of whole-cell recordings from voltage-clamped CA3 pyramidal cells. Suppression of EPSCs after application of the metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist DCG IV at the end of the experiment served to confirm selective activation of the MF pathway (Figure 2C). MF-evoked EPSCs are distinct from other excitatory synaptic responses in that they show a very strong facilitation upon short, repetitive stimulation at relative high frequency (e.g., 4 stimuli at 20 Hz; Figure 2A, inset)—a stimulus paradigm which partially mimics firing patterns of DG granule cells in vivo [39]. To quantify this signature facilitation between genotypes, we normalized the subsequent EPSC peak amplitudes to that of the first response in the train. As summarized in Figure 2A (wt, n = 20 from 8 mice; M1/M3-dKO, n = 20 from 8 mice), the strong facilitation during the four-stimuli trains was not affected by the absence or presence of M1/M3 receptors. Likewise, another prominent feature of MF synapses, namely frequency facilitation (Nicoll and Schmitz, 2005), defined as strong facilitation during sustained low-frequency stimulation (Figure 2B), remained unchanged in the absence of M1/3 receptors (wt, n = 8 from 6 mice; M1/M3-dKO, n = 8 from 5 mice). The mean increase of evoked MF-EPSCs at 1 min of stimulation was 347.93 ± 51.33 % in wt cells and 280.14 ± 25.45 % in M1/M3-dKO cells (p = 0.256).
In striking contrast to short-term and frequency facilitation which were M1/M3 receptor-independent, these receptors came into play when we examined long-term plasticity at the MF-CA3 synapse. For induction of LTP, we used a high-frequency stimulation protocol (HFS at 100 Hz for 1 s, repeated 3 times with 10 s intervals). Lack of M1/M3 receptors led to a much larger potentiation of the evoked responses after HFS compared to the relatively modest potentiation observed in wt hippocampi (Figure 2C–F). As illustrated in Figure 2C,D, responses of MF-CA3 synapses to a given stimulus varied in size, with failure rates (ratio of non-responsive stimuli vs. total stimuli during baseline) depending on stimulation intensity in individual slices. HFS engendered a massive reduction in failure rate in both groups (wt, n = 7 from 5 mice, from 24.90 ± 6.55 % to 4.36 ± 1.85 % over 20 min after HFS, paired t-test, p = 0.020; M1/M3-dKO, n = 8 from 5 mice, from 19.37 ± 6.39 % to 1.01 ± 0.73 % over 20 min after HFS, paired t-test, p = 0.018) (Figure 2C–E). In control hippocampi, HFS enhanced the averaged amplitudes of evoked MF-EPSCs by 143.73 ± 5.91 % (n = 7), measured over 16-20 min post HFS (Figure 2F). By contrast, the mean potentiation of MF-EPSCs in M1/M3-dKO hippocampi at the same time period reached 287.03 ± 32.33 % (n = 8; unpaired t-test, p = 0.001 vs wt), which was significantly different from wt hippocampi [two-way- ANOVA, factor genotype F(1, 279) = 5,770, p = 0.000; factor time for 1-20 min F(19, 279) = 2.221, p = 0.004; Figure 2F]. Since we observed a similar pronounced increase in LTP for the same synapse in M2-deficient hippocampi [1], both M1/M3 and M2 receptors appear to constrain MF LTP.
Consistent with the presynaptic site of MF-LTP [26], we observed a strong rise of spontaneous synaptic events between the three HFS stimulus trains and immediately after them (Figure 3A). Specifically, the frequency of spEPSCs in wt pyramidal cells (n = 7) increased by 242.21 ± 29.55 % [Figure 3B; from 2.28 ± 0.46 Hz to 4.72 ± 0.96 Hz within 30 s after HFS, then decayed quickly to 3.11 ± 0.58 Hz in the next 30 s; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test, F(1, 7) = 29.39, p = 0.001], accompanied by an increase in peak amplitude [Figure 3C; from 23.80 ± 2.27 pA to 31.01 ± 4.24 pA within 30 s after HFS, i.e., 128.65 ± 9.50 % of control; one-way ANOVA, F(1, 7) = 75.57, p = 5.34e-5]. In M1/M3-deficient slices, the HFS-associated rise in the number of spontaneous events sky-rocketed to 1035.00 ± 215.30 % of control (1.10 ± 0.17 Hz, n = 8), with a concomitant enhancement of spEPSC amplitude (184.11 ± 15.75 % of control value 15.18 ± 1.38 pA) (Figure 3B,C). The massive impact of M1/M3-deficiency on the responsiveness of CA3 spEPSCs to MF tetanus was evident from plots of the relative changes immediately after HFS (Figure 3B,C, right; two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test, with factor 1—genotype and factor 2—time), for both frequency [F(1, 28) = 21.22, p = 8.11e-5] and peak amplitude [F(1, 28) = 21.74, p = 6.98e-4].
We asked next how the synaptic effects of M1/M3 receptors observed in single, voltage-clamped CA3 pyramidal cells would influence the collective neuronal behavior in a network with intact GABAergic inhibition. To address this issue, we performed field potential recordings in CA3 stratum lucidum in the absence of any blockers. Electrical stimulation of MFs evoked a characteristic biphasic response, in which a fiber volley (FV, reflecting synchronized action potential firing in the MF pathway) was followed by a field postsynaptic potential (fPSP, Figure 4A, inset). Again, suppression of fPSP by the metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist DCG IV demonstrated selective activation of the MF pathway. As we have previously reported [31], tetanic stimulation of MFs at 25 Hz for 5 s produced robust LTP in control slices, with peak fPSP amplitudes at 26-30 min post-tetanus rising to 144.22 ± 7.80 % of control (0.24 ± 0.02 mV, n = 9 from 6 wt mice; Figure 4A,B). In M1/M3-dKO slices, the same protocol enhanced fPSP amplitude to 190.18 ± 22.29 % of control (0.18 ± 0.02 mV, n = 6 from mutant mice), which was significantly stronger than in the wt counterparts (p = 0.037vs wt hippocampi; Figure 4B). In line with the corresponding whole-cell recordings (Figure 2A,B), fPSP recordings did not reveal significant differences between the genotypes regarding quadruple-pulse facilitation and frequency facilitation (Figure 4C,D).

3.3. M1/M3-dKO turns LTD into LTP

Like many other glutamatergic synapses in the CNS, MF synapses onto CA3 pyramidal cells undergo LTD after prolonged low-frequency stimulation (LFS at 1 Hz for 15 min). To study and compare muscarinic modulation of MF-LTD vs. -LTP at the same cellular level, we went back to whole-cell recordings of pharmacologically isolated MF-evoked EPSCs. Since MF-LTD is presynaptic in origin, as is MF-LTP, the whole-cell configuration should not interfere with either form of long-term plasticity at this particular synapse, in particular since NMDA receptors were blocked again with d-APV (see Methods). A typical example of MF-LTD in wt hippocampus is illustrated in Figure 5A. When determined 16-20 min after LFS, the averaged EPSC amplitude was reduced to 64.46 ± 9.57 % of control in wt hippocampi (n = 7 slices from 5 mice; Figure 5D), accompanied by enhanced failure rates. (Figure 5C). Note that in LTD experiments, control stimulation intensity before LFS was adjusted to obtain a low failure rate (4.31 ± 1.66 % in wt slices, n = 7). This enabled appropriate capture of the higher failure rates after LFS-induced LTD, which were significantly increased to 16.44 ± 4.81 % (paired t-test, p = 0.030; Figure 5C). In striking contrast, application of the very same stimulation protocol not only abrogated LTD in M1/M3-dKO hippocampi, but even induced LTP, with MF-EPSC amplitudes increasing to 120.74 ± 5.38 % of control value 16-20 min after LFS (n = 5 from 4 mice, p = 0.001 vs. wt; Figure 5B,D).
Given that LTP of the MF-CA3 synapse in the hippocampus of M2-KO mice was augmented in a fashion strongly resembling that reported here for M1/M3-dKO mice [1], we wondered whether such synergism between M1- and M2-type receptors also holds for MF-LTD. To our surprise, we obtained the opposite finding: the extent of LTD in M2-KO slices was significantly enhanced, amounting to 58.40 ± 6.99 % reduction (n = 6 slices from 4 M2-KO mice), compared to 28.01 ± 6.98 % in wt slices (n = 5 from 4 mice; p = 0.031) (Figure 5E,F). LFS-induced LTD was also accompanied by higher failure rate in the mutant cells (wt, from 5.84 ± 1.69 % to 13.44 ± 4.55 %, paired t-test, p = 0.107; M2-KO, from 1.42 ± 0.90 % to 21.02 ± 6.98 %, paired t-test, p = 0.026). Thus, M1/M3 and M2 receptors exert opposite effects on LTD at the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse.

4. Discussion

Muscarinic depression of LTP at the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse has been reported first by Williams and Johnston in 1988 (see also Maeda et al., 1993) [40,41]. Since then, the peculiar electrophysiological properties of this rather unique hippocampal synapse have been studied in great detail and related to learning and memory tasks involving pattern separation and/or completion [26]. In view of the wealth of data accumulated on the many uncommon features and functions of the MF-CA3 synapse within the hippocampal circuitry and in behavioral readouts, it is quite surprising that we still know relatively little about how and for what purposes this synapse is modulated by acetylcholine.
In view of the lack of muscarinic agonists and antagonists with pronounced subtype selectivity [36], the generation of subtype-specific mAChR-KO mice was a major step towards delineating the physiological functions of the M1-M5 receptors [9,42]. Nevertheless, one might ask whether the fact that these mice all have global mAChR-KOs, altering muscarinic effects in many tissues and organs including the brain, might compromise firm conclusions on the role of the respective mAChR subtype, as compared to a conditional KO. In the context of our study, we are aware of only one mAChR-KO with remote impact on hippocampal neurophysiology, which was reported from M5-deficient mice [43]. Although expression of M5 receptors in CA3 and DG is negligible [27], CA3 pyramidal cells showed a significant reduction of spEPSC frequency in that study. This seemingly paradox finding has been attributed to the fact that M5-KO mice suffer from constitutive constriction of cerebral arteries, leading to neuronal atrophy and impaired synaptic connectivity in hippocampus and elsewhere in the brain [43].
We report here the unexpected finding that in hippocampi of M1/M3-dKO mice, MF-LTP is significantly augmented when compared to wt hippocampi. This finding is corroborated by the fact that we observed anomalously enhanced MF-LTP in M1/M3-dKO hippocampi using two independent experimental settings with distinct induction protocols, namely (i) field potential recordings from hippocampal slices exhibiting intact network activity, and (ii) whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings from CA3 pyramidal cells, in which the GABAA receptor blocker picrotoxin was routinely added to the bathing solution to obtain unambiguous measurements of EPSCs. These experiments strongly suggest that activation of M1-type mAChRs serves to curtail MF-LTP.
Although quite obvious from the experimental evidence, this conclusion seems counterintuitive for two reasons. Firstly, as noted already by Williams and Johnston in their 1988 paper [40], muscarinic depression of MF-LTP would not have been predicted on the basis of the widely documented essential role of the cholinergic system in facilitating cognitive functions including hippocampus-dependent learning and memory. Common wisdom links a decline in LTP to impaired cognitive performance. This relationship holds indeed for M2-deficient mice, whose memory deficits were attributed to reduced plasticity at the Schaffer collateral–CA1 synapse [13]. The second reason, why the above conclusion is puzzling, is based on the observations that hippocampi from both M1/M3-deficient and M2-deficient mice exhibit a strikingly similar increase in MF-LTP, as demonstrated here and in an earlier study [1], respectively. How might signaling pathways as different as those of M2-type receptors, which couple to Gi/o proteins, and those of M1-type receptors, which couple to Gq/11 proteins, functionally converge on inhibition of MF-LTP?
In the hippocampus, M1 and M3 receptors are mainly located postsynaptically [2], where they target various ion conductances to enhance cell excitability and promote firing. Mechanisms include suppression of K+ currents such as M-current (Im) and a slow Ca2+-activated K+ current (IAHP), and increase of depolarizing cation currents such as the hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) and a Ca2+-dependent nonspecific cation conductance (Icat) [44,45,46]. Using mice lacking M1 receptors, Fisahn et al. demonstrated that M1 receptor activation depolarizes CA3 pyramidal cells by increasing Ih and Icat [47]. Thus, reduced muscarinic excitation of presynaptic granule cells and CA3 neurons most likely accounts for the diminished spEPSC frequency that we measured in CA3 neurons from M1/M3-dKO hippocampi.
Do M1-type receptors have also a presynaptic site of action to regulate glutamate release directly? We addressed this issue by monitoring mEPSCs in the presence of TTX and pharmacological suppression of GABAA, GABAB, M2-type und nicotinic receptors. When we enhanced the level of ambient acetylcholine with the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor eserine, we observed a significant increase in mEPSC frequency, most likely mediated by presynaptic M1 receptors. In support of this notion, M1 receptors have been found indeed to distribute along mossy fibers, albeit with lower density compared to those in dendrites and spines [48]. Note that, although MF-LTP is presynaptic, M1 receptor does not necessarily have to reside on terminals to regulate the strength of synaptic potentiation. An attractive candidate pathway to account for the apparent disinhibition of MF-LTP in the absence of M1/M3 receptors involves retrograde endocannabinoid signaling. Activation of postsynaptic M1 and M3 receptors during strong synaptic use may trigger release of endocannabinoids from the postsynaptic site [49] which in turn bind to presynaptic CB1 receptors to suppress transmitter release [50].
Whereas it remains to be determined in future studies how postsynaptic and/or presynaptic M1/M3 receptor signaling contains MF-LTP, explaining how M2 receptor activation results in the same outcome seems more straightforward. The canonical pathway of MF-LTP comprises the following sequence [26]: Ca2+ influx through presynaptic voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels → activation of Ca2+-sensitive adenylyl cyclase 1 → elevation of cAMP levels → activation of PKA → persistent increase in transmitter release. As discussed in more detail before, presynaptic M2 heteroreceptors on MF terminals may interfere with LTP induction through inhibition of presynaptic Ca2+ channels and/or attenuation of adenylyl cyclase activity [1].
While M1 and M2 receptors seem to use different routes to curtail MF-LTP, our study also reveals some commonalities in the way they act. Firstly, with GABAA receptors routinely blocked in our whole-cell recordings, elimination of neither mAChR subtype should have disinhibited MF-LTP through a GABAergic mechanism, where activation of presynaptic GABAA receptors facilitates MF-CA3 synaptic plasticity [51]. Secondly, in both field potential and whole-cell recordings, we employed robust stimulation protocols to induce presynaptic MF-LTP, instead of weak stimulation protocols, which induce an unorthodox postsynaptic and NMDA receptor-mediated form of MF-LTP [52,53]. Thus, M1 and M2 subtypes should both have a presynaptic site of action to regulate LTP (including also retrograde signaling, vs.). Thirdly, both mAChR types not only inhibit MF-LTP, they also have in common that they do not affect the unique hallmarks of MF short-term plasticity, namely quadruple-pulse facilitation and frequency facilitation.
Endowed with the latter features, MF synapses can act as a “conditional detonator” [54]. This particular property allows the MF synapse to assume a role as unsupervised “teacher” synapse triggering plastic changes in the connectivity pattern of CA3 neurons. In the case of place cells, such formed ensembles of CA3 pyramidal cells are important for storage and recall of spatial information [54]. Put simply, muscarinic inhibition of MF-LTP might thus be envisioned as a means to preserve the integrity of the “conditional detonator”, which might blow up unintentionally when synaptic potentiation is not properly controlled.
Whereas MF-LTP is synergistically capped by activation of M1- and M2- type receptors, our study demonstrates that the two receptor types exert e opposite effects on MF-LTD. In M1/M3-dKO, LTD was abrogated and LFS produced even a small potentiation, whereas loss of M2 receptors augmented LTD (Figure 6). Interestingly, a very similar shift from LTD to LTP following LFS was observed in visual cortex slices from M1/M3-dKO mice [55]. Unlike MF synapses in the hippocampus, the excitatory synapses examined in the visual cortex preparation display postsynaptic, NMDA receptor-dependent long-term plasticity. It is remarkable that, although the sites and mechanisms of induction of LTP and LTD differ substantially between hippocampal MF synapses and the synapses in visual cortex, both synapses rely on M1/M3 activation to prevent the paradoxical conversion of LTD to LTP following LFS.
Our data obtained with wt hippocampal preparations suggest that, under physiological conditions, the opposing forces that act on MF-LTD, namely M1/M3 receptor-mediated augmentation vs. M2 receptor-mediated inhibition, are matched to enable a degree LTD that is capable of counterbalancing LTP. We found indeed that long-term plasticity of the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse extends almost equally in both directions, with a rather small bias in favor of LTP over LTD (Figure 6). For several reasons, it has been postulated that in a network, where synapses undergo LTP, LTD is a necessary counterweight to enhance the overall performance in information processing, storage and recall [56]. First and foremost, LTD counteracts the saturating effects that would ensue from potentiation alone. Furthermore, LTD facilitates the grouping of potentiated synapses that constitute a memory trace by suppressing synapses that do not participate in encoding this particular trace. Finally, LTD enables behavioral flexibility by weakening previously learned information that would interfere with the acquisition of new information in a changing environment.
This latter conclusion resulted from work with transgenic mice in which NMDA-dependent LTD of the Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapse was selectively disrupted [57]. A similar approach to decipher the functional role of MF-LTD has not been reported yet. However, valuable insights come from field potential recordings in freely behaving rats demonstrating that LTD in the CA3 region encodes different aspects of a novel environment in an input-specific fashion: MF-LTD is associated with exploration of landmark objects, whereas exploration of discrete positional features of the environment facilitates A/C-LTD [58]. Whereas the full behavioral implications of MF-LTP and -LTD are only beginning to be understood, our study shows that muscarinic receptor activation confers a properly balanced bidirectional plasticity on the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse, which should be important for optimal functionality and flexibility in learning and memory tasks.
The Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro (BCM) theory of synapse modification has become an influential concept to model and predict bidirectional synaptic plasticity at excitatory synapses [59]. Originally developed to account for synaptic modifications in the visual cortex of kittens following monocular deprivation [60], BCM theory was later extended to provide a formal description of the relationship between “classical” (NMDA receptor-mediated) LTD and LTP in hippocampus and elsewhere. It remains to be examined, though, whether BCM theory is also applicable to the rather unique properties of MF-plasticity. Central to the BCM model is the biphasic plasticity induction function φ, which calculates the likelihood that afferent synaptic activity induces either LTD or LTP, based on the correlated postsynaptic activity. Plotting the change in synaptic weight as a function of postsynaptic activity yields a characteristic curve, where LTD first waxes and wanes as postsynaptic activity gradually increases. Then, the curve crosses baseline and the synaptic weight change grows in the opposite direction (LTP), until saturation. The intersection of the curve with the baseline, where the sign of synaptic plasticity reverses polarity, is termed synaptic modification threshold, θm. Importantly, BCM theory sets θm as a sliding threshold, thereby introducing a homeostatic mechanism, according to the following metaplastic rule: In a neuron with a prior history of strong firing, θm will be elevated, impeding LTP and facilitating LTD; conversely, θm is lowered following a period of weak postsynaptic activity, now favoring LTP over LTD. Proposals on the mechanisms underlying the sliding θm all comprise postsynaptic effects, including changes in NMDA receptor subunit composition [61], in CaMKII levels [62], in Ca2+ release from intracellular stores [63], and in H-current activity [64].
To make our findings fit BCM theory, several points need to be considered. Although we did not vary MF stimulation systematically over a wide frequency range, it seems plausible to assume that MF-LTD and -LTP exhibit a relationship to presynaptic activity that can be described by a BCM-like curve. We further assume that the synaptic modification at the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse displays a sliding threshold θm analogous to conventional synapses, but with a presynaptic mechanism, possibly involving the cAMP/PKA cascade [26,65]. Our data predict that activation of mAChRs is capable of moving θm towards higher values of presynaptic activity. This rightward shift of θm makes LTP more difficult, but, in contrast to the conventional BMC model, it also impedes LTD. Thus, application of a modified BMC theory to model muscarinic regulation of MF-plasticity seems feasible, provided that the above issues are addressed.

5. Conclusions

For a synapse like the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse, which operates as a conditional detonator, it is essential to prevent runaway potentiation when plasticity-inducing stimulation is repeated over time. We propose that the dense cholinergic innervation of the CA3 region is intimately involved in curtailing uncontrolled potentiation. In fact, acetylcholine secures this objective by recruiting mAChRs from both subtype families, underscoring its functional significance. In the framework of a modified BCM theory, the muscarinic effect on long-term MF-plasticity can be understood as a recalibration of the synaptic modification threshold θm, independent from metaplasticity. Notably, mAChR activation leaves intact the characteristic short-term plasticity of the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse, as this feature appears indispensable to maintain its full operability within the hippocampal network. In summary, our study adds a missing piece to the greater picture of how the cholinergic system tunes the many neural properties of the hippocampus to promote cognitive functions.

Author Contributions

J.W. generated and provided the M1/M3-dKO and the M2-KO mice used in this study; F.Z. performed experiments and analyzed data; F.Z. and C.A. designed the research, interpreted results and wrote the manuscript, with contributions from J.W.

Acknowledgements

We thank Didier Gremelle for technical assistance. This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant AL 294/9-1 (to CA). J.W. received funding from the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK, NIH).

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

Abbreviations

aCSF, artificial cerebrospinal fluid; A/C, associational/commissural fiber; DG, dentate gyrus; EPSC, excitatory postsynaptic current; FV, fiber volley; fPSP, field postsynaptic potential; HFS, high-frequency stimulation; LFS, low-frequency stimulation; LTD, long-term depression; LTP, long-term potentiation; MF, mossy fiber; mAChR, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor; nAChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; SC, Schaffer collateral; STP, short-term plasticity; TTX, tetrodotoxin

References

  1. Zheng, F.; Wess, J.; Alzheimer, C. M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors regulate long-term potentiation at hippocampal CA3 pyramidal cell synapses in an input-specific fashion. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 10, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Levey, A.I. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor expression in memory circuits: implications for treatment of Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 13541–13546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hasselmo, M.E. The role of acetylcholine in learning and memory. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006, 16, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Thiele, A. Muscarinic signaling in the brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 36, 271–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Haam, J.; Yakel, J.L. Cholinergic modulation of the hippocampal region and memory function. J. Neurochem. 2017, 142 (Suppl 2), 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ananth, M.R.; Rajebhosale, P.; Kim, R.; Talmage, D.A.; Role, L.W. Basal forebrain cholinergic signalling: development, connectivity and roles in cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2023, 24, 233–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Felder, C.C. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: signal transduction through multiple effectors. FASEB J. 1995, 9, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wess, J. Molecular biology of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 1996, 10, 69–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bymaster, F.P.; McKinzie, D.L.; Felder, C.C.; Wess, J. Use of M1-M5 muscarinic receptor knockout mice as novel tools to delineate the physiological roles of the muscarinic cholinergic system. Neurochem. Res. 2003, 28, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wess, J.; Eglen, R.M.; Gautam, D. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: mutant mice provide new insights for drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 721–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thomsen, M.; Sørensen, G.; Dencker, D. Physiological roles of CNS muscarinic receptors gained from knockout mice. Neuropharmacology 2018, 136(Pt C), 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tzavara, E.T.; Bymaster, F.P.; Felder, C.C.; Wade, M.; Gomeza, J.; Wess, J.; McKinzie, D.L.; Nomikos, G.G. Dysregulated hippocampal acetylcholine neurotransmission and impaired cognition in M2, M4 and M2/M4 muscarinic receptor knockout mice. Mol. Psychiatry 2003, 8, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Seeger, T.; Fedorova, I.; Zheng, F.; Miyakawa, T.; Koustova, E.; Gomeza, J.; Basile, A.S.; Alzheimer, C.; Wess, J. M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor knock-out mice show deficits in behavioral flexibility, working memory, and hippocampal plasticity. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 10117–10127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bainbridge, N.K.; Koselke, L.R.; Jeon, J.; Bailey, K.R.; Wess, J.; Crawley, J.N.; Wrenn, C.C. Learning and memory impairments in a congenic C57BL/6 strain of mice that lacks the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype. Behav. Brain Res. 2008, 190, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Romberg, C.; Bartko, S.; Wess, J.; Saksida, L.M.; Bussey, T.J. Impaired object-location learning and recognition memory but enhanced sustained attention in M2 muscarinic receptor-deficient mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2018, 235, 3495–3508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Poulin, B.; Butcher, A.; McWilliams, P.; Bourgognon, J.M.; Pawlak, R.; Kong, K.C.; Bottrill, A.; Mistry, S.; Wess, J.; Rosethorne, E.M.; Charlton, S.J.; Tobin, A.B. The M3-muscarinic receptor regulates learning and memory in a receptor phosphorylation/arrestin-dependent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9440–9445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Leaderbrand, K.; Chen, H.J.; Corcoran, K.A.; Guedea, A.L.; Jovasevic, V.; Wess, J.; Radulovic, J. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors act in synergy to facilitate learning and memory. Learn. Mem. 2016, 23, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Miyakawa, T.; Yamada, M.; Duttaroy, A.; Wess, J. Hyperactivity and intact hippocampus-dependent learning in mice lacking the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21, 5239–5250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anagnostaras, S.G.; Murphy, G.G.; Hamilton, S.E.; Mitchell, S.L.; Rahnama, N.P.; Nathanson, N.M.; Silva, A.J. Selective cognitive dysfunction in acetylcholine M1 muscarinic receptor mutant mice. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shinoe, T.; Matsui, M.; Taketo, M.M.; Manabe, T. Modulation of synaptic plasticity by physiological activation of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the mouse hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 11194–11200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kamsler, A.; McHugh, T.J.; Gerber, D.; Huang, S.Y.; Tonegawa, S. Presynaptic m1 muscarinic receptors are necessary for mGluR long-term depression in the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 1618–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kobayashi, K.; Manabe, T.; Takahashi, T. Presynaptic long-term depression at the hippocampal mossy fiber-CA3 synapse. Science 1996, 273, 648–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kemp, A.; Manahan-Vaughan, D. Hippocampal long-term depression: master or minion in declarative memory processes? Trends Neurosci. 2007, 30, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Connor, S.A.; Wang, Y.T. A place at the Table: LTD as a Mediator of Memory Genesis. Neuroscientist 2016, 22, 359–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Manabe, T. Two forms of hippocampal long-term depression, the counterpart of long-term potentiation. Rev. Neurosci. 1997, 8, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nicoll, R.A.; Schmitz, D. Synaptic plasticity at hippocampal mossy fibre synapses. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 863–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vilaró, M.T.; Palacios, J.M.; Mengod, G. Localization of m5 muscarinic receptor mRNA in rat brain examined by in situ hybridization histochemistry. Neurosci. Lett. 1990, 14, 14,154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Levey, A.I.; Kitt, C.A.; Simonds, W.F.; Price, D.; Brann, M.R. Identification and localization of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor proteins in brain with subtype-specific antibodies. J. Neurosci. 1991, 11, 3218–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gautam, D.; Heard, T.S.; Cui, Y.; Miller, G.; Bloodworth, L.; Wess, J. Cholinergic stimulation of salivary secretion studied with M1 and M3 muscarinic receptor single- and double-knockout mice. Mol. Pharmacol. 2004, 66, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gomeza, J.; Shannon, H.; Kostenis, E.; Felder, C.; Zhang, L.; Brodkin, J.; Grinberg, A.; Sheng, H.; Wess, J. Pronounced pharmacologic deficits in M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor knockout mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 1692–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sydow, A.; Van der Jeugd, A.; Zheng, F.; Ahmed, T.; Balschun, D.; Petrova, O.; Drexler, D.; Zhou, L.; Rune, G.; Mandelkow, E.; D’Hooge, R.; Alzheimer, C.; Mandelkow, E.M. Tau-induced defects in synaptic plasticity, learning and memory are reversible in transgenic mice after switching off the toxic Tau mutant. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 2511–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xiang, Z.; Brown, T.H. Complex synaptic current waveforms evoked in hippocampal pyramidal neurons by extracellular stimulation of dentate gyrus. J. Neurophysiol. 1998, 79, 2475–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Henze, D.A.; Urban, N.N.; Barrionuevo, G. The multifarious hippocampal mossy fiber pathway: a review. Neuroscience 2000, 98, 407–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Langdon, R.B. , Johnson, J.W.; Barrionuevo, G. Asynchrony of mossy fibre inputs and excitatory postsynaptic currents in rat hippocampus. J. Physiol. 1993, 472, 157–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Burke, R.E. Gallamine binding to muscarinic M1 and M2 receptors, studied by inhibition of [3H]pirenzepine and [3H]quinuclidinylbenzilate binding to rat brain membranes. Mol. Pharmacol. 1986, 30, 58–68. [Google Scholar]
  36. Caulfield, M.P.; Birdsall, N.J. International Union of Pharmacology. XVII. Classification of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 1998, 50, 279–290. [Google Scholar]
  37. Vogt, K.E.; Regehr, W.G. Cholinergic modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission in the CA3 area of the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bacher, I.; Wu, B.; Shytle, D.R.; George, T.P. Mecamylamine—a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist with potential for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2009, 20, 2709–2721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pernía-Andrade, A.J.; Jonas, P. Theta-gamma-modulated synaptic currents in hippocampal granule cells in vivo define a mechanism for network oscillations. Neuron 2014, 81, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Williams, S.; Johnston, D. Muscarinic depression of long-term potentiation in CA3 hippocampal neurons. Science 1988, 242, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maeda, T.; Kaneko, S.; Satoh, M. Bidirectional modulation of long-term potentiation by carbachol via M1 and M2 muscarinic receptors in guinea pig hippocampal mossy fiber-CA3 synapses. Brain Res. 1993, 619, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gautam, D.; Duttaroy, A.; Cui, Y.; Han, S.J.; Deng, C.; Seeger, T.; Alzheimer, C.; Wess, J. M1-M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-deficient mice: novel phenotypes. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2006, 30, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Araya, R,; Noguchi, T.; Yuhki, M.; Kitamura, N.; Higuchi, M.; Saido, T.C.; Seki, K.; Itohara, S.; Kawano, M.; Tanemura, K.; Takashima, A.; Yamada, K.; Kondoh, Y.; Kanno, I.; Wess, J.; Yamada, M. Loss of M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors leads to cerebrovascular and neuronal abnormalities and cognitive deficits in mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 2006, 24, 334–344. [CrossRef]
  44. Halliwell, J.V.; Adams, P.R. Voltage-clamp analysis of muscarinic excitation in hippocampal neurons. Brain Res. 1982, 250, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Madison, D.V.; Lancaster, B.; Nicoll, R.A. Voltage clamp analysis of cholinergic action in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 1987, 7, 733–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Colino, A.; Halliwell, J.V. Carbachol potentiates Q current and activates a calcium-dependent non-specific conductance in rat hippocampus in vitro. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1993, 5, 1198–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fisahn, A.; Yamada, M.; Duttaroy, A.; Gan, J.W.; Deng, C.X.; McBain, C.J.; Wess, J. Muscarinic induction of hippocampal gamma oscillations requires coupling of the M1 receptor to two mixed cation currents. Neuron 2002, 33, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Martinello, K.; Huang, Z.; Lujan, R.; Tran, B.; Watanabe, M.; Cooper, E.C.; Brown, D.A.; Shah, M.M. Cholinergic afferent stimulation induces axonal function plasticity in adult hippocampal granule cells. Neuron 2015, 85, 346–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ohno-Shosaku, T.; Matsui, M. , Fukudome, Y; Shosaku, J.; Tsubokawa, H.; Taketo, M.M.; Manabe, T.; Kano, M. Postsynaptic M1 and M3 receptors are responsible for the muscarinic enhancement of retrograde endocannabinoid signalling in the hippocampus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 18, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Straiker, A.; Mackie, K. Depolarization-induced suppression of excitation in murine autaptic hippocampal neurons. J. Physiol. 2005, 569, 501–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ruiz, A.; Campanac, E.; Scott, R.S.; Rusakov, D.A.; Kullmann, D.M. Presynaptic GABAA receptors enhance transmission and LTP induction at hippocampal mossy fiber synapses. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kwon, H.B.; Castillo, P.E. Long-term potentiation selectively expressed by NMDA receptors at hippocampal mossy fiber synapses. Neuron 2008, 57, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rebola, N.; Lujan, R.; Cunha, R.A.; Mulle, C. Adenosine A2A receptors are essential for long-term potentiation of NMDA-EPSCs at hippocampal mossy fiber synapses. Neuron 2008, 57, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bischofberger, J.; Engel, D.; Frotscher, M.; Jonas, P. Timing and efficacy of transmitter release at mossy fiber synapses in the hippocampal network. Pflug. Arch. 2006, 453, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Origlia, N.; Kuczewski, N.; Aztiria, E.; Gautam, D.; Wess, J.; Domenici, L. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor knockout mice show distinct synaptic plasticity impairments in the visual cortex. J. Physiol. 2006, 577(Pt 3) Pt 3, 829–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rosenzweig, E.S.; Barnes, C.A.; McNaughton, B.L. Making room for new memories. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5, 6–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nicholls, R.E.; Alarcon, J.M.; Malleret, G.; Carroll, R.C.; Grody, M.; Vronskaya, S.; Kandel, E.R. Transgenic mice lacking NMDAR-dependent LTD exhibit deficits in behavioral flexibility. Neuron 2008, 58, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hagena, H.; Manahan-Vaughan, D. Learning-facilitated synaptic plasticity at CA3 mossy fiber and commissural-associational synapses reveals different roles in information processing. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21, 2442–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cooper, L.N.; Bear, M.F. The BCM theory of synapse modification at 30: interaction of theory with experiment. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13, 798–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bienenstock, E.L.; Cooper, L.N.; Munro, P.W. Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 1982, 2, 32–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Philpot, B.D.; Sekhar, A.K.; Shouval, H.Z.; Bear, M.F. Visual experience and deprivation bidirectionally modify the composition and function of NMDA receptors in visual cortex. Neuron 2001, 29, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Mayford, M.; Wang, J.; Kandel, E.R.; O’Dell, T.J. CaMKII regulates the frequency-response func-tion of hippocampal synapses for the production of both LTD and LTP. Cell 1995, 81, 891–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hulme, S.R.; Jones, O.D.; Ireland, D.R.; Abraham, W.C. Calcium-dependent but action potential-independent BCM-like metaplasticity in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci 2012, 32, 6785–6794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Narayanan R, Johnston D. The h current is a candidate mechanism for regulating the sliding modification threshold in a BCM-like synaptic learning rule. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 104, 1020–1033. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Fukaya, R.; Hirai, H.; Sakamoto, H.; Hashimotodani, Y.; Hirose, K.; Sakaba, T. Increased vesicle fusion competence underlies long-term potentiation at hippocampal mossy fiber synapses. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadd3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Preprints 79403 g001
Figure 1. M1/M3-dKO reduces excitatory synaptic drive onto CA3 pyramidal cells. (A) Representative spEPSC recordings from wt neuron (black trace) and mutant neuron (red trace), respectively. Insets depict averaged synaptic events from respective cells. (B-C) Comparison of frequency and peak amplitude (B), and kinetics (C) of spEPSCs between the two genotypes. Numbers in columns indicate sample size. (D-F) Reversible increase in mEPSC frequency and amplitude during application of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor eserine (10 µM) in wt slices superfused with gallamine (20 µM) alone or in combination with mecamylamine (10 µM), in the presence of TTX (1 µM), picrotoxin (100 µM) and CGP 55845 (1 µM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1. M1/M3-dKO reduces excitatory synaptic drive onto CA3 pyramidal cells. (A) Representative spEPSC recordings from wt neuron (black trace) and mutant neuron (red trace), respectively. Insets depict averaged synaptic events from respective cells. (B-C) Comparison of frequency and peak amplitude (B), and kinetics (C) of spEPSCs between the two genotypes. Numbers in columns indicate sample size. (D-F) Reversible increase in mEPSC frequency and amplitude during application of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor eserine (10 µM) in wt slices superfused with gallamine (20 µM) alone or in combination with mecamylamine (10 µM), in the presence of TTX (1 µM), picrotoxin (100 µM) and CGP 55845 (1 µM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Preprints 79403 g001
Preprints 79403 g002
Figure 2. M1/M3-dKO does not alter STP, but strongly facilitates LTP of the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse. (A-B) No significant change in short-term plasticity (STP) in M1/M3-dKO preparation. Top current trace in A from wt slice illustrates massive synaptic facilitation during quadruple-pulse stimulation with 55 µA. Diagram below summarizes EPSC amplitudes normalized to that of 1st EPSC. (B) Frequency facilitation after switching from 0.1 Hz to 1 Hz stimulation. EPSC amplitudes were normalized for comparison. Inset shows EPSC traces from a wt cell before and 1 min post 1 Hz stimulation. (C-D) Scatter plots of EPSC responses before and after HFS in wt pyramidal cell (C) and mutant pyramidal cell (D). (E) Drop in failure rates after HFS in both genotypes. (F) Comparison of HFS-induced LTP in wt cells (black symbols) and mutant cells (red symbols). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 2. M1/M3-dKO does not alter STP, but strongly facilitates LTP of the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse. (A-B) No significant change in short-term plasticity (STP) in M1/M3-dKO preparation. Top current trace in A from wt slice illustrates massive synaptic facilitation during quadruple-pulse stimulation with 55 µA. Diagram below summarizes EPSC amplitudes normalized to that of 1st EPSC. (B) Frequency facilitation after switching from 0.1 Hz to 1 Hz stimulation. EPSC amplitudes were normalized for comparison. Inset shows EPSC traces from a wt cell before and 1 min post 1 Hz stimulation. (C-D) Scatter plots of EPSC responses before and after HFS in wt pyramidal cell (C) and mutant pyramidal cell (D). (E) Drop in failure rates after HFS in both genotypes. (F) Comparison of HFS-induced LTP in wt cells (black symbols) and mutant cells (red symbols). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Preprints 79403 g002
Preprints 79403 g003
Figure 3. M1/M3-dKO augments spEPSC after HFS of MF pathway. (A) Current traces from wt und M1/M3-dKO pyramidal cells before, during and after three HFS trains (arrows) to induce MF-LTP. Arrowheads indicate evoked EPSCs at 0.1 Hz. (B-C) HFS-induced changes in spEPSC frequency (B) and amplitude (C), quantified every 30 s. Statistical comparisons were conducted using one-way (left panels) or two-way (right panels) ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test at alpha = 0.05. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3. M1/M3-dKO augments spEPSC after HFS of MF pathway. (A) Current traces from wt und M1/M3-dKO pyramidal cells before, during and after three HFS trains (arrows) to induce MF-LTP. Arrowheads indicate evoked EPSCs at 0.1 Hz. (B-C) HFS-induced changes in spEPSC frequency (B) and amplitude (C), quantified every 30 s. Statistical comparisons were conducted using one-way (left panels) or two-way (right panels) ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test at alpha = 0.05. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Preprints 79403 g003
Preprints 79403 g004
Figure 4. M1/M3-dKO promotes MF-LTP in extracellular recordings from CA3 stratum lucidum. (A) Trajectory of fPSPs before and after LTP-inducing stimulation (25 Hz for 5 s) in wt slice. Inset above depicts fPSP traces from like-numbered time points in trajectory. Stimulus artifacts were removed from fPSP traces. Arrowhead indicates fiber volley. (B) Comparison of normalized LTP trajectories between genotypes. Two-way ANOVA for 1-30 min post-tetanus: factor genotype, F(1,840) = 189.53, p = 4.94e-39. (C-D) M1/M3-dKO did affect neither quadruple-pulse facilitation (C) nor frequency facilitation (D) of fPSPs. * p < 0.05.
Figure 4. M1/M3-dKO promotes MF-LTP in extracellular recordings from CA3 stratum lucidum. (A) Trajectory of fPSPs before and after LTP-inducing stimulation (25 Hz for 5 s) in wt slice. Inset above depicts fPSP traces from like-numbered time points in trajectory. Stimulus artifacts were removed from fPSP traces. Arrowhead indicates fiber volley. (B) Comparison of normalized LTP trajectories between genotypes. Two-way ANOVA for 1-30 min post-tetanus: factor genotype, F(1,840) = 189.53, p = 4.94e-39. (C-D) M1/M3-dKO did affect neither quadruple-pulse facilitation (C) nor frequency facilitation (D) of fPSPs. * p < 0.05.
Preprints 79403 g004
Preprints 79403 g005
Figure 5. M1/M3-dKO converts LFS-induced LTD into LTP of the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse. (A-B) Scatter plots of EPSCs before and after LFS in wt pyramidal cell (A) and M1/M3-dKO pyramidal cell (B). Insets above illustrate averaged EPSC traces from like-numbered time points. (C-D) Summary of changes in failure rates (C) and amplitudes (D) of EPSCs after LFS for either genotype. (E) Scatter plot of EPSCs before and after LFS in M2-KO preparation. (F) Comparison of LFS-induced MF-LTD between wt and M2-KO hippocampi, using normalized EPSC responses. Two-way ANOVA for 1-20 min post-LFS: factor genotype, F(1,218) = 134.99, p = 1.33e-24 (D); F(1,199) = 36.36, p = 7.83e-9 (F). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 5. M1/M3-dKO converts LFS-induced LTD into LTP of the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse. (A-B) Scatter plots of EPSCs before and after LFS in wt pyramidal cell (A) and M1/M3-dKO pyramidal cell (B). Insets above illustrate averaged EPSC traces from like-numbered time points. (C-D) Summary of changes in failure rates (C) and amplitudes (D) of EPSCs after LFS for either genotype. (E) Scatter plot of EPSCs before and after LFS in M2-KO preparation. (F) Comparison of LFS-induced MF-LTD between wt and M2-KO hippocampi, using normalized EPSC responses. Two-way ANOVA for 1-20 min post-LFS: factor genotype, F(1,218) = 134.99, p = 1.33e-24 (D); F(1,199) = 36.36, p = 7.83e-9 (F). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Preprints 79403 g005
Preprints 79403 g006
Figure 6. Synopsis of how mAChRs shape bidirectional plasticity at the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse. See text for details.
Figure 6. Synopsis of how mAChRs shape bidirectional plasticity at the MF-CA3 pyramidal cell synapse. See text for details.
Preprints 79403 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated