Preprint
Article

Risk Factors for Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Non-HIV Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Case-Control Study

Altmetrics

Downloads

185

Views

70

Comments

0

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

05 August 2023

Posted:

07 August 2023

You are already at the latest version

Alerts
Abstract
Background Very few cases of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) have been reported in COVID-19 so far, mostly in patients with concomitant HIV infection or in solid organ transplant recipients. Despite COVID-19 is associated with lymphopenia and use of steroids, there are no studies specifically aimed to investigate risk factors for PCP in COVID-19 Methods retrospective case-control study in a cohort of patients with confirmed COVID-19. Direct immunofluorescence assay on respiratory samples was used to diagnose PCP. Results We enrolled 54 patients. Patients with PCP had significant lower median lymphocyte values (p=0.033), longer COVID-19 disease duration (p=0.014), higher cumulative dose of steroid received (p=0.026), higher CRP values (p=0.005) and lower SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rate than controls (p=0.029). Cumulative steroid dose (p=0.042) and the highest CRP value during the stay (p=0.012) were identified as risk factor for PCP, while SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with one (p=0.029) and two doses (p=0.049) as a protective factor for PCP, although not independently associated. Conclusions PCP develops in COVID-19 patients regardless of immunosuppressive conditions. However, a higher rate of PCP is significantly associated with the cumulative steroidal dose, high CRP values and lack of vaccination.
Keywords: 
Subject: Biology and Life Sciences  -   Virology

Background

Coronavirus Infectious Disease 19 (COVID-19) is the diseases caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), characterized by a clinical picture ranging from pauci-symptomatic illness to interstitial pneumonia leading to respiratory failure and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.[1]
Differently from influenza pandemics, respiratory co-infections and superinfections are not very common in COVID-19 patients: according to a 2020 meta-analysis by Lansbury and colleagues, in fact, bacterial co-infections account for a 7% of COVID-19 overall, with only sporadically reported fungal infections.[2]
On the other hand, a most recent meta-analysis by Kurra and colleagues, published in 2022, has shown that the pooled prevalence of opportunistic infections in COVID-19 patients is 16%, with the highest prevalence of secondary infections among viruses at 33%, 16% among the bacteria subgroup and 6% among the fungi subgroup.[3]
Thus, invasive fungal infections (IFIs), are a not-negligible complications of COVID-19, especially among critically ill patients, and are also associated with a significant higher mortality: 53% in patients with fungal diseases and 31% in patients without fungal diseases (p = 0.0387).[3]
The most common IFIs complicating the course of COVID-19 are invasive candidiasis [4] and pulmonary aspergillosis, with the latter that became a specific clinical syndrome: the COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), defined by the 2020 ECMM/ISHAM consensus criteria.[5]The cumulative incidence of CAPA in the ICU ranged from 1.0% to 39.1%, with 33.0% of deaths attributed to CAPA, according to a large retrospective cohort of 2020.[6] Another non negligible and severe IFI has emerged as complication of COVID-19, especially in India: the COVID-19 Associated Mucormicosis (CAM). CAM is a destructive and potential life-threatening IFI responsible for 7% of deaths in affected patients. It may also occur 4-6 weeks after COVID-19 onset, and it is highly influenced by decompensated glycemic status in diabetic patients.[7]
Other IFIs, such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), are only sporadically reported, almost exclusively in case series and case reports, and mainly in previously immunocompromised hosts (concomitant HIV infection or solid organ transplant recipients).[8,9] Unfortunately, no definite consensus about COVID-associated PJP, nor any definite diagnostic criteria have been published, so far, and the existence of the PJP associated with COVID-19 has been questioned by the scientific community. While the diagnostic criteria for IFIs published by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSGERC), which are designed for immunocompromised hosts, have been modified to permit the diagnosis of CAPA also in immunocompetent patients, the same has never been done for PJP.[10]
In fact, it is difficult to establish a true incidence of PJP among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, according to the published studies, since not all the available reports adopt standardized diagnostic criteria for PJP definition and most of them are based on molecular detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii on respiratory samples instead of direct detection of the fungus with immunofluorescence assay or direct staining. In fact, the two largest and most recent systematic reviews aimed to describe clinical features and risk factors for PJP in COVID-19, both published between the end of January and the beginning of February 2023, consider a different number of cases: specifically, Amstutz et al. describe 69 cases of PJP in COVID-19 in 29 articles, while Sasani et al. 30 cases.[11,12]Moreover, no study in literature is available to specifically assess risk factors for PJP development in COVID-19, using rigorous diagnostic criteria for case definition. Accordingly, we conducted a case-control study to identify risk factors for PJP in HIV-negative patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at our institution.

Methods

Study design

The study was conducted in “Federico II” University Hospital, located in Naples, Italy: the largest University Hospital of Southern Italy and the referral center for COVID-19 in pregnancy for the Campania Region.
We retrospectively evaluated clinical data of all the patients admitted for COVID-19 at Infectious Disease ward and Intensive Care Unit of “Federico II” University Hospital from 1st November 2021 to 30th September 2022 and diagnosed with PJP during hospital stay, according to the diagnostic criteria reported below. Controls were selected among patients admitted for COVID-19 in the same period who did not received diagnosis of PJP. For each case, two controls were matched, based on age+10 years. All the possible controls were stratified according to the following variables: i) absence of any previous immunosuppressive conditions; ii) presence of solid organ transplantation (SOT); iii) presence of hematological malignancies; iv) setting of PJP development (ICU vs. non-ICU). To reduce the selection bias of comparing patients with different pre-existing risk factors for PJP, the controls matching cases’ age+10 years were selected with a simple randomization after such stratification.

Definitions

The diagnosis of PJP was considered according to the EORTC/MSGERC criteria: “proven” if P. jirovecii was detected with direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) on respiratory samples; “probable” in the presence of host factors, clinical features and microbiological evidence; “possible” in the presence of host and clinical features with the absence of microbiological evidence.[10] According to EORTC/MSGERC criteria, host factors were defined as: receipt of therapeutic doses of corticosteroids for at least 2 weeks within the past 60 days; antineoplastic, anti-inflammatory, or immunosuppressive treatment; and low CD4 lymphocyte counts due to a medical condition, included, but not limited, to patients with primary immuno-deficiencies, hematologic malignancies, SOTs, and allogeneic HSCT recipients.[10]
Clinical features were considered as follows: any consistent radiographic features, particularly bilateral ground glass opacities, consolidations, small nodules or unilateral infiltrates lobar in-filtrate, nodular infiltrate with or without cavitation, multifocal infiltrates, miliary pattern and/or respiratory symptoms with cough, dyspnea, and hypoxemia accompanying radiographic abnormalities including consolidations, small nodules, unilateral infiltrates, pleural effusions, or cystic lesions on chest X-ray or computed tomography scan.[10]
Microbiological evidence was defined as: detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in a respiratory tract specimen or Beta-D-glucan ≥80 ng/L (pg/mL) detection in ≥2 consecutive serum samples provided other etiologies have been excluded.[10]
PJP severity was classified according to the 1996 classification by Miller at al. in mild, moderate and severe, based on clinical features, peripheral oxygen saturation, chest radiology and arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) on room air.[13] Cut-off for arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) at rest, room air were: >11.0 kPa (>82.5 mmHg) for mild disease; 8.1–11.0 kPa (60.75–82.5 mmHg) for moderate disease and <8.0 kPa (<60 mmHg) for severe disease.[13]
Charlson Comorbidity Index comorbidities were calculated to evaluate patient’s comorbidity.[14] Steroid dose was calculated as equivalent to dexamethasone, since dexamethasone was the most frequently used steroid drug in the studied population. Chronic steroidal treatment was defined as a daily dose > 0.3 mg/kg of prednisone or equivalent for >2 weeks taken by the patient in the past 60 days, according to the EORTC/MSGERC criteria for host factors.[10]
COVID-19 severity was assessed with the World Health Organization 9-point severity scale as follows: 0: no clinical or virological evidence of infection; 1: ambulatory, no activity limitation; 2: ambulatory, activity limitation; 3: hospitalized, no oxygen therapy; 4: hospitalized, oxygen mask or nasal prongs; 5: hospitalized, noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC); 6: hospitalized, intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV); 7: hospitalized, IMV + additional support such as pressors or extracardiac membranous oxygenation (ECMO); 8: death.[15]

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL). Continuous variables were reported as median and interquartile range and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Categorial variables were confronted with Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test, when appropriate. Continuous variables were confronted with Mann-Whitney U test. A significance level of 0.05 was set for the interpretation of the results. The confidence interval was set at 95% for the interpretation of the results. An univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) between the development of PJP and the following demographic and clinical variables: age; sex; pregnancy; Charleson Comorbidity Index; SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; use of Pneumocystis prophylaxis; length of stay; COVID-19 disease duration; use of immunosuppressive treatment; type of immunosuppressive condition; length and dose of steroid and O2 therapy; worst recorded WHO grade and PaO2/FiO2 ratio; lowest absolute lymphocyte value and highest LDH, CRP and D-Dimer value.. A forward stepwise logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors of PJP out of the variables resulted significant at univariate analysis. At each step, variables were added according to their contribution to the model’s R2 and the p-value threshold of 0.05 was sed to set a limit on the total number of variables included in the final model.

Results

We enrolled 54 patients (18 cases and 36 matched controls) on a total of 380 patients admitted during the study period (14%). The median age of the included patients was 60 years (95% IQR 51-68), with 34.5% of females and 12.7% of pregnant women and a median Charlson index of 3 (95% IQR 1-5). The largest part of the patients (60%) had received at least one dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and stayed at hospital for a median of 16 days (95% IQR 12-34). During hospital stay, the patients received a median of 85 mg (95% IQR 55-180) cumulative dexamethasone dose for a median of 15 days (95% IQR 12-27) and only 6 out of 54 of them (11%) received immunomodulatory therapies for COVID-19, in detail: 4 baricitinib and 2 tocilizumab. Half of the studied population (53%) was immunocompromised for hematologic malignancies, with the most common condition represented by non-Hodgkin lymphoma. (Table 1)
Among 18 cases of PJP, 16 were diagnosed as “proven”, of which 10 were diagnosed with DFA on BAL, while 6 with DFA on non-bronchoscopic obtained lower respiratory tract samples (bronchial aspiration or mini-BAL). Regarding the two patients diagnosed as having “possible” PJP, they presented both host and radiological factors and no minor microbiological criteria (PCR on respiratory samples or serum BDG). Seven of the 18 cases were immunocompromised, of which 5 (27.8%) for hematologic conditions and 2 (11%) for SOT, while the other patients had no previous immunological impairment. Nine out of 18 cases of PJP required ICU admission; among them, 4 were diagnosed before ICU admission and 5 during ICU stay.
All patients but one were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe course of PJP according to Miller criteria and treated with intravenous trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) at the dose of 15-20 mg/kg divided in 3-4 daily doses for 21 days (with switch to oral drug whenever it was feasible after reaching clinical improvement) plus prednisone 40 mg (or dexamethasone at equivalent dose) twice daily for the first 5 days, followed by 40 mg daily for 5 days and 20 mg daily for the remaining 11 days. One patient presented with mild disease and was treated with oral TMP-SMX 2 double strength tabs three times daily for 21 days with no adjunctive steroids. Only one patient diagnosed with PJP had detectable serum BDG in two samples obtained in different days (>523 pg/mL in both determinations). The patient had follicular lymphoma treated with rituximab, a severe course of PJP requiring ICU admission and died 22 days after PJP diagnosis; he didn’t develop any concurrent IFIs during hospital stay, to our knowledge. Conversely, two patients developed concurrent IFIs, namely one case of Aspergillus tracheobronchitis and one case of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. They were both pregnant patients in their early thirties, both requiring ICU admission and both died. No patients developed drug adverse reaction that required cessation of the therapy with TMP-SMX and 6 of them (33%) died.
Patient diagnosed with PJP had similar comorbidity index, WHO grade, and number of days of highest O2 support received than controls; conversely, length of stay, mortality and ICU admission were higher in cases compared to controls, although non-significantly. Also, the nadir of lymphocyte count and of PaO2/FiO2 ratio recorded were lower in PJP patients compared to controls. (Table 1)
Compared to controls, patients with PJP had significant lower median lymphocyte values (540 vs. 780 cells/mm3, p=0.033), longer COVID-19 disease duration (25 vs. 16 days, p=0.014), higher cumulative dose of steroid received (178.5 vs. 78 mg, p=0.026), higher CRP values (14.4 vs. 6.3 mg/dL, p=0.005) and lower SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rate than controls (7 patients with at least one dose vs. 26 patients with no history of vaccination, p=0.029). (Table 1)
At the univariate analysis, cumulative steroid dose received during hospital stay (OR 1.004, 95%CI 1-1.008, p=0.042) and the highest CRP value recorded during the hospitalization (OR 1.076, 95%CI 1.016-1.140, p=0.012) were identified as risk factor for PJP, while SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with one (OR 0.269, 95%CI 0.083-0.877, p=0.029) and two doses (OR 0.304, 95%CI 0.093-0.994, p=0.049) as a protective factor for PJP. In order to identify factors that may predict the development of PJP, a forward multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted by simultaneously entering cumulative steroid dose received, highest CRP value and vaccination with at least one dose into the model. The results indicated that the model accounted for a significant amount of variance in success (likelihood ratio: chi-squared = 5.24, p=0.022). However, out of all the predictors in the model, only cumulative steroidal dose resulted to be an independent predictor of PJP development (b=0.04, SE=0.02, OR=1.004, 95%CI=1-1.008, p=0.042), after controlling for SARS-Cov-2 vaccination and CRP value.
By considering the clinical differences between vaccinated (at least one dose) and unvaccinated patients, unvaccinated patients had significant lower recorded P/F ratio (p=0.015) and received significantly higher dose of steroids (p=0.031) than vaccinated (Table 2).

Discussion

Compared to controls, patients with PJP have significant lower median lymphocyte values, longer COVID-19 disease duration, higher cumulative dose of steroid received, higher CRP values and lower SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rate than controls, although only cumulative steroid dose received resulted to be independently associated with the risk of developing PJP.
As we know from years of study about PJP, the main risk factors for its development are: HIV infection with CD4+ lymphocyte count <200 cells/mm3 and high HIV viral loads; certain hematologic conditions (graft versus host diseases, use of prolonged lymphopenia in the context of other hematologic malignancies, use of lymphocyte-depleting agents for lymphomas or lymphoblastic leukemia etc.); autoimmune conditions treated with lymphocyte-depleting agents; high and prolonged doses of steroids (≥0.3 mg/kg prednisone equivalent for ≥2 weeks in the past 60 days); solid organ transplantation, especially if lung or small bowel or complicated by lymphopenia or use of anti-thymocyte agents.[16,17,18]
On the other hand, it is well described how the occurrence of a severe acute respiratory illness (SARI), especially when it ends up in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring ICU admission, become an ideal breeding ground for PJP development due to lung damage, sepsis-induced immune-paralysis and iatrogenic immunosuppression in otherwise immunocompetent hosts, as reported by Beumer and colleagues during the influenza A epidemic of 2015, when 2% of non-ICU and 7% of ICU patients developed PJP as a complication of viral infection.[19]
Similar mechanisms have been called upon the development of IFIs in COVID-19 patients, together with the use of corticosteroids and immunomodulatory agents as part of therapy and with the absolute and CD4+ lymphopenia associated with COVID-19, which level correlate with disease severity and poor prognosis.[20,21,22]
According to these considerations, patients with COVID-19, even if previously immunocompetent, may develop de novo risk factors for PJP, such as severe lymphopenia, use of high dose of steroids or other immunomodulating drugs, together with COVID-19-associated pathological mechanisms (i.e., lung epithelial barrier damage and immune system dysregulation).[23]
In fact, considering the results of the systematic reviews by Amstutz and Sasani, only half of the patients from the included studies were found to have at least one immunosuppressive condition before COVID-19 onset that predispose them to PJP, most commonly HIV infection, while the remaining patients had no classic risk factors for PJP development, meaning that COVID-19 itself and its treatment are a novel risk factor for PJP to be addressed.[11,12]
Moreover, Amstutz and colleagues have found that 45% of patients with PJP received long term corticosteroids before and during COVID-19 and discovered a median absolute lymphocyte count (IQR) of 610 (280–920) cells/mm3 (n = 23) and CD4 count (IQR) of 66 (33–291.5) cells/mm3 (n = 20) in the studied population.[11]
In light of the abovementioned considerations, the results of our study enforce the hypothesis that also immunocompetent patient can acquire de novo risk factors for PJP. In fact, in these patients, the amount of received steroids is the main risk factor for PJP development. It is noteworthy that the other known risk factors of PJP resulted to be non-significant in our study (i.e.; severity of COVID-19, lymphopenia, chronic immunosuppression, ICU stay). Notably, in the cohort of patients of our study that developed PJP, the median length of steroid administration was 15 (IQR 12-20) days, i.e. within the range of two weeks established by EORT/MSGERC for host factors.[10]
Moreover, it must be noted that, according to previous data from the literature, there is a wide variability among healthy subjects in lymphocyte response to corticosteroid (-6.7% to 99.7%) and that also an intermittent use of high dose of corticosteroids, not followed by daily administration, as it happens in chemotherapy regimen for lymphoma, is associated with risk of developing PJP.[24,25] Thus, in COVID-19 patients, also the intermittent use of high dose of glucocorticoids can become an ideal breeding ground for PJP, as demonstrated by our results.
The underlying mechanism behind the role of corticosteroids in increasing the risk of PJP has been explained by some experiments on rats carried in the late 90s. In fact, the administration of corticosteroids has been used for decades for inducing PJP in experimental rats.[26] In rats with corticosteroid induced PJP, researchers have observed a depletion of T helper cells in blood, and a fall in T helper (Th) cells and a rise in T suppressor (Ts) cells in lungs, with normal subpopulation in thymus, spleen and bone marrow.[27] When corticosteroids were withdrawn, the rats gained weight, cleared P. jirovecii from the lungs, and regenerated their lymphoid tissues; the lymphocyte subpopulations exhibited variation in their frequencies at different body sites, but gradually returned to baseline levels.[27]It would be interesting to know with ad hoc studies if the length or the cumulative steroid dose can also have an impact on COVID-associated PJP outcome, shown for example in the ANSWER Cohort Study by Shiba and colleagues in patients with rheumatoid arthritis that developed PJP, in which baseline higher dose of chronic steroid at the time of PJP diagnoses was associated with higher mortality.[28]
It must be highlighted that most patients in our cohort developed PJP during the first waves of the pandemic (at the beginning of vaccination campaign), when most of them haven’t completed vaccination cycle; it was a time in which general practitioners in Italy used to prescribe prolonged corticosteroids therapy at COVID-19 symptoms onset irrespective of the need of oxygen supplementation. This could be the reason why in our cohort, lack of vaccination and higher CRP resulted non-independently associated with PJP, together with steroid use: unvaccinated patients had more severe disease than vaccinated, as we demonstrated in Table 2 and, probably because of that, reached higher value of CRP than vaccinated and received higher steroid doses.
Despite the findings of our study, we speculate that also other elements, independent from the universally accepted risk factors, must be considered to explain the development of PJP in COVD-19 patients, especially given the fact that some clinical center have never diagnosed a single case of PJP in COVID-19.
One of them could be the presence of prior colonization of the respiratory tract by Pneumocystis jirovecii spores before hospitalization or the airborne transmission from infected patients to susceptible ones, as it occurred in the past with PJP outbreaks in transplantation hospital units.[29,30] The clustering transmission of Pneumocystis jirovecii in the hospital setting can explain why the report of PJP cases are so heterogeneous in literature, with some centers like ours reporting higher numbers of cases than others, but such hypothesis must be confirmed with ad-hoc studies.
PCR for P. jirovecii on respiratory samples, also noninvasively obtained, such as sputum, tracheal aspirate or oral washing, have a promising role in identifying colonized patients at risk of developing PJP, even though we think that DFA should be preferred over PCR for the diagnosis of PJP, given the low efficacy of PCR in discriminate between colonization and infection.[31]
Surprisingly, despite all but two patients in our cohort received a “proven” diagnosis of PJP and only two a “possible” diagnosis, no patient but one had detectable BDG on repeated serum samples, in line with the findings of Amstutz and colleagues, which report a positive BDG only in 66.7% of patients in the studied included in their meta-analysis.[11] This findings are apparently in contrast to the high negative predictive value of BDG to rule out the diagnosis of PJP, reported in several studies.[32]. Nonetheless, according to the meta-analysis published in 2020 by Del Corpo and colleagues, the BDG test is more sensitive in patients with HIV than in those without (94% versus 86%) and a negative BDG is only associated with a low post-test probability of PJP (≤5%) when the pre-test probability was low to intermediate (≤20% in non-HIV and ≤50% in HIV).[33] The low rate of BDG positivity in COVID-19 patients can be related to a lower fungal burden in such population, compared to HIV patients, but this hypothesis need to be confirmed with specific studies.
As for indications for PJP primary chemoprophylaxis, no definite rules exist for non-HIV patients and no studies have been ever conducted in patients with COVID-19. The 5th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-5) established that main indications of PJP prophylaxis are acute lymphoid leukemia, allogeneic HSCT, treatment with alemtuzumab, fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab combinations, >4 weeks of treatment with corticosteroids and well-defined primary immune deficiencies in children.[34] On the other hand, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommends PJP prophylaxis in patients treated with daily doses >15–30 mg of prednisolone or equivalent for >2–4 weeks.[35]
Surprisingly, in our study, neither PJP prophylaxis result as a protective factor for PJP development (OR 0.252, 95%CI=0.029-2.226, p=0.215), nor chronic steroid therapy, SOT and malignancies resulted as risk factors. Thus, it is very difficult to early identify COVID-19 patients at risk of developing PJP that may benefit of a chemoprophylaxis. Generalizing our results, despite we couldn’t find any particular subgroup of COVID-19 patients that is at high risk of PJP development, we can say that PJP can occur in any COVID-19 patient who received corticosteroids for at least 2 weeks, regardless of previous immune status. Thus, it is important to suspect PJP in patients who present with persistence, worsening of relapse of SARI, even if they achieved virological clearance from SARS-CoV-2.
It is also important to identify on admission patients for which PJP prophylaxis is indicated independently from COVID-19 and prescribe chemoprophylaxis during hospital stay and after discharge, if needed, especially they are expected to receive corticosteroids for COVID-19 for a period longer than 2 weeks.
The present study has several limitations: the retrospective design; the small number of subject involved, given the rarity of the disease; data collection from a single center in a limited period of time; potential selection bias.

Conclusions

PJP develops in COVID-19 patients regardless of previous immunosuppressive conditions. High corticosteroid dose received before and during hospital admission is the independently associate risk factor for PJP development in this population. BDG assay seems to have a poor performance in ruling out PJP in COVID-19 patients, therefore, bronchoscopy must not be withheld in case of high suspicion of pulmonary super-infection or co-infection, especially in patients who received high dose of corticosteroids
Further studies are needed to establish the incidence and risk factor of Pneumocystis jirovecii colonization among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and the risks for the development of symptomatic infection among colonized hosts, also aiming to identify high-risk patients that might benefit from PJP chemoprophylaxis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Giulio Viceconte, Antonio Riccardo Buonomo and Ivan Gentile; Data curation, Maria Foggia; Formal analysis, Riccardo Scotto; Investigation, Alessia D'Agostino, Antonio di Fusco, Carmine Iacovazzo, Luca Fanasca, Gaetana Messina and Francesco Cacciatore; Methodology, Luca Fanasca and Paola Salvatore; Resources, Maria Foggia; Supervision, Biagio Pinchera, Paola Salvatore and Ivan Gentile; Writing – original draft, Giulio Viceconte and Alessia D'Agostino; Writing – review & editing, Antonio Riccardo Buonomo and Ivan Gentile.

Funding

This research was supported by EU funding within the NextGenerationEU-MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (Project no. PE00000007, INF-ACT) and POR Campania FESR 2014-2020 - Asse 1 - Obiettivo Specifico 1.3. - Azione 1.3.1.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Naples Federico II (protocol n. 180/21).

Consent for publication

Patient consent was waived because the research involves materials (data, documents, records, or specimens) that have been collected solely for non-research purposes (medical treatment or diagnosis). The data are recorded by the investigators in an anonymous manner such that subjects cannot be identified directly or through identifiers linked to the subject.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available Federico II University Hospital, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Federico II University Hospital.

Acknowledgments

**Federico II COVID-team: Luigi Ametrano, Francesco Beguinot, Anna Borrelli, Giuseppe Castaldo, Letizia Cattaneo, Mariarosaria Cotugno, Alessia d’Agostino, Luca Cianfrano, Giovanni Di Filippo, Isabella Di Filippo, Antonio Di Fusco, Nunzia Esposito, Mariarosaria Faella, Lidia Festa, Maria Foggia, Maria Elisabetta Forte, Ludovica Fusco, Antonella Gallicchio, Ivan Gentile, Agnese Giaccone, Carmela Iervolino, Irene Iorio, Antonio Iuliano, Amedeo Lanzardo, Federica Licciardi, Giuseppe Longo, Matteo Lorito, Simona Mercinelli, Fulvio Minervini, Giuseppina Muto, Mariano Nobile, Biagio Pinchera, Giuseppe Portella, Laura Reynaud, Alessia Sardanelli, Marina Sarno, Nicola Schiano Moriello, Maria Michela Scirocco, Fabrizio Scordino, Riccardo Scotto, Stefano Mario Susini, Anastasia Tanzillo, Grazia Tosone, Maria Triassi, Emilia Trucillo, Annapaola Truono, Ilaria Vecchietti, Giulio Viceconte, Riccardo Villari, Emanuela Zappulo, Irene Zotta, Giulia Zumbo.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest with respect to the main topic of the paper.

References

  1. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA [Internet]. 2020 Feb 7 [cited 2020 Feb 10]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32031570.
  2. Lansbury L, Lim B, Baskaran V, Lim WS. Co-infections in people with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Infection [Internet]. 2020 Aug 1 [cited 2022 Feb 15];81(2):266–75. Available from: http://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163445320303236/fulltext.
  3. Kurra N, Woodard PI, Gandrakota N, Gandhi H, Polisetty SR, Ang SP, et al. Opportunistic Infections in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2022 Mar 31; 2022.
  4. Díaz-García J, Mesquida A, Machado M, Sánchez-Carrillo C, Muñoz P, Escribano P, et al. Yeasts from blood cultures in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care hospital: Shift in species epidemiology, steady low antifungal resistance and full in vitro ibrexafungerp activity. Med Mycol. 2023 Jul 6;61(7).
  5. Koehler P, Bassetti M, Chakrabarti A, Chen SCA, Colombo AL, Hoenigl M, et al. Defining and managing COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: the 2020 ECMM/ISHAM consensus criteria for research and clinical guidance [Internet]. Vol. 0, The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Lancet Publishing Group; 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 13]. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/article/S1473309920308471/fulltext.
  6. Salmanton-García J, Sprute R, Stemler J, Bartoletti M, Dupont D, Valerio M, et al. COVID-19–Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis, March–August 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(4):1077–86.
  7. Satija A, Anand T, Mukherjee A, Velamuri PS, Singh KhJ, Das M, et al. Satellite Epidemic of Covid-19 Associated Mucormycosis in India: A Multi-Site Observational Study. Mycopathologia. 2023.
  8. Abdoli A, Falahi S, Kenarkoohi A. COVID-19-associated opportunistic infections: a snapshot on the current reports. Clinical and Experimental Medicine 2021 22:3. 2021 Aug 23;22(3):327–46.
  9. Alsayed AR, Al-Dulaimi A, Alkhatib M, Maqbali M Al, Al-Najjar MAA, Al-Rshaidat MMD. A comprehensive clinical guide for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a missing therapeutic target in HIV-uninfected patients. Expert Rev Respir Med [Internet]. 2022;16(11–12):1167–90. [CrossRef]
  10. Peter Donnelly J, Chen SC, Kauffman CA, Steinbach WJ, Baddley JW, Verweij PE, et al. Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clinical Infectious Diseases [Internet]. 2020 Sep 12 [cited 2023 Feb 6];71(6):1367–76. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/71/6/1367/5645434. 1367.
  11. Amstutz P, Bahr NC, Snyder K, Shoemaker DM. Pneumocystis jirovecii Infections Among COVID-19 Patients: A Case Series and Literature Review. Open Forum Infect Dis [Internet]. 2023 Feb 1;10(2):ofad043. [CrossRef]
  12. Sasani E, Bahrami F, Salehi M, Aala F, Bakhtiari R, Abdollahi A, et al. Pneumocystis pneumonia in COVID-19 patients: A comprehensive review. Heliyon [Internet]. 2023 Feb 1;9(2). [CrossRef]
  13. Miller RF, Noury J Le, Corbett EL, Mark Felton J, De Cock KM. Pneumocystis carinii infection: current treatment and prevention. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy [Internet]. 1996 May 1[cited 2023 Feb 6];37(suppl_B):33–53. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jac/article/37/suppl_B/33/740773.
  14. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.
  15. WHO R&D Blueprint novel Coronavirus COVID-19 Therapeutic Trial Synopsis [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Feb 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/blueprint/priority-diseases/key-action/COVID-19_Treatment_Trial_Design_Master_Protocol_synopsis_Final_18022020.
  16. de Boer MGJ, Kroon FP, le Cessie S, de Fijter JW, van Dissel JT. Risk factors for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients and appraisal of strategies for selective use of chemoprophylaxis. Transplant Infectious Disease. 2011 Dec 1;13(6):559–69.
  17. Maertens J, Cesaro S, Maschmeyer G, Einsele H, Donnelly JP, Alanio A, et al. ECIL guidelines for preventing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with haematological malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2016 Sep 1;71(9):2397–404.
  18. Wolfe RM, Peacock JE. Pneumocystis Pneumonia and the Rheumatologist: Which Patients Are At Risk and How Can PCP Be Prevented? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017;19(6):35.
  19. Beumer MC, Koch RM, van Beuningen D, OudeLashof AM, van de Veerdonk FL, Kolwijck E, et al. Influenza virus and factors that are associated with ICU admission, pulmonary co-infections and ICU mortality. J Crit Care. 2019;50:59–65.
  20. The Recovery Collaborative Group. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 — Preliminary Report. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020.
  21. Sun HB, Zhang YM, Huang LG, Lai QN, Mo Q, Ye XZ, et al. The changes of the peripheral CD4+ lymphocytes and inflammatory cytokines in Patients with COVID-19. Rout N, editor. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 25;15(9):e0239532.
  22. Nasim S, Kumar S, Azim D, Ashraf Z, Azeem Q. Corticosteroid use for 2019-nCoV infection: A double-edged sword. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 1;41(10):1244–5.
  23. White PL, Dhillon R, Cordey A, Hughes H, Faggian F, Soni S, et al. A National Strategy to Diagnose Coronavirus Disease 2019–Associated Invasive Fungal Disease in the Intensive Care Unit. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e1634–44.
  24. Hearing SD, Norman M, Smyth C, Foy C, Dayan CM. Wide Variation in Lymphocyte Steroid Sensitivity Among Healthy Human Volunteers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Nov;84(11):4149–54.
  25. Calero-Bernal ML, Martin-Garrido I, Donazar-Ezcurra M, Limper AH, Carmona EM. Intermittent Courses of Corticosteroids Also Present a Risk for Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Non-HIV Patients. Can Respir J. 2016;2016:1–7.
  26. Boylan CJ, Current WL. Improved rat model of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: induced laboratory infections in Pneumocystis-free animals. Infect Immun. 1992 Apr;60(4):1589–97.
  27. Walzer PD, LaBine M, Redington TJ, Cushion MT. Lymphocyte changes during chronic administration of and withdrawal from corticosteroids: relation to Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. The Journal of Immunology. 1984 Nov 1;133(5):2502–8.
  28. Shiba H, Kotani T, Nagai K, Hata K, Yamamoto W, Yoshikawa A, et al. Prognostic Factors Affecting Death in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Complicated by Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia and One-Year Clinical Course: The ANSWER Cohort Study. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2023;24(8). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/8/7399.
  29. Hosseini-Moghaddam SM, Dufresne PJ, Hunter Gutierrez E, Dufresne SF, House AA, Humar A, et al. Long-lasting cluster of nosocomial pneumonia with a single Pneumocystis jirovecii genotype involving different organ allograft recipients. Clin Transplant. 2020 Dec 1;34(12):e14108.
  30. Le Gal S, Damiani C, Rouillé A, Grall A, Tréguer L, Virmaux M, et al. A Cluster of Pneumocystis Infections Among Renal Transplant Recipients: Molecular Evidence of Colonized Patients as Potential Infectious Sources of Pneumocystis jirovecii. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2012 Apr 1;54(7):e62–71.
  31. Alsayed AR, Talib W, Al-Dulaimi A, Daoud S, Al Maqbali M. The first detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii in asthmatic patients post COVID-19 in Jordan. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2022.
  32. Karageorgopoulos DE, Qu JM, Korbila IP, Zhu YG, Vasileiou VA, Falagas ME. Accuracy of β -D-glucan for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2013 Jan;19(1):39–49.
  33. Del Corpo O, Butler-Laporte G, Sheppard DC, Cheng MP, McDonald EG, Lee TC. Diagnostic accuracy of serum (1-3)-β-D-glucan for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection [Internet]. 2020 Sep 1 [cited 2022 Jan 17];26(9):1137–43. Available from: http://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198743X20303013/fulltext.
  34. Maertens J, Cesaro S, Maschmeyer G, Einsele H, Donnelly JP, Alanio A, et al. ECIL guidelines for preventing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with haematological malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2016 Sep 1;71(9):2397–404.
  35. Fragoulis GE, Nikiphorou E, Dey M, Zhao SS, Courvoisier DS, Arnaud L, et al. 2022 EULAR recommendations for screening and prophylaxis of chronic and opportunistic infections in adults with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis [Internet]. 2023 Jun 1;82(6):742. Available from: http://ard.bmj.com/content/82/6/742.abstract.
Table 1. Overall demographic and clinical characteristics of the population, group comparison, univariate and multivariate analysis. ICU: intensive care unit; CRP: C-reactive protein.
Table 1. Overall demographic and clinical characteristics of the population, group comparison, univariate and multivariate analysis. ICU: intensive care unit; CRP: C-reactive protein.
Overall
N=54
Cases
n=18
Controls
n=36
p-value OR (95%CI), p-value p-value
Age, years, median (IQR) 60 (51-68) 60 (49.75-70) 60 (49-78) 0.98 0.994 (0.995-1.034) 0.754
Females, n (%) 19 (34.5) 7 (39) 12 (32) 0.764 0.754 (0.234-2.433) 0.637
Pregnant, n (%) 7 (12.7) 4 (22) 3 (8) 0.2 3.2 (064-16.32) 0.155
Charlson Comorbidity Index, median (IQR) 3 (1-5) 3 (0.75-5) 3 (1-5) 0.389 0.876 (0.685-1.12) 0.291
Deaths, n (%) 14 (25.5) 6 (33) 8 (21.6) 0.51 - -
ICU admission, n (%) 20 (37) 9 (50) 11(30) 0.232 - -
SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, n (%)
1 dose 33 (60) 7 (39) 26 (70) 0.027 0.269 (0.083-0.877) 0.029
2 doses 29 (52) 6 (33) 23 (62) 0.042 0.304 (0.093-0.994) 0.049
3 doses 16 (29) 3 (16.7) 13 (35) 0.135 0.369 (0.9-1.5) 0.166
4 doses 2 (3.6) 0 (0) 2 (5.4) 1 0 (0-0) -
Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis recipients, n (%) 8 (14.5) 1 (5.6) 7 (19) 0.25 0.252 (0.029-2.226) 0.215
Length of stay, days, median (IQR) 16 (12-34) 20.5 (14.5-50.25) 15 (10.5-27) 0.058 1.033 (0.998-1.068) 0.062
Days of SARS-Cov-2 positivity, median (IQR) 20 (14-26) 25 (20-37) 16 (13-23) 0.014 1.141 (0.993-1.322) 0.062
Use of immunomodulatory drug for COVID-19, n (%) 6 (11) 3 (16.7) 3 (8) 0.381 2.267 (0.0409-12.5) 0.349
Hematologic malignancy, n (%) 29 (53) 5 (27.8) 10 (27) 0.39 0.564 (0.166-1.915) 0.359
Use of anti-CD20, n (%) 6 (11) 3 (16.7) 3 (8) 0.381 2.267 (0.409-12.5) 0.349
Chronic steroidal treatment, n (%) 8 (14.5) 3 (16.7) 5 (13.5) 1 1.28 (0.270-6) 0.756
Solid organ transplant recipients, n (%) 6 (11) 2 (11) 4 (10.8) 1 1.031 (0.171-6.23) 0.973
Cumulative steroid dose during hospital stay, milligrams, median (IQR) 84 (55-190) 178.5 (68-513) 78 (46-158) 0.026 1.004 (1-1.008) 0.042
Number of days of steroid, median (IQR) 15 (12-27) 15 (12-20) 16.5 (12-29.25) 0.718 0.984 (0.929-1.043) 0.596
Worst WHO grade, median (IQR) 4 (4-6) 5 (4-6) 4 (4-6.5) 0.434 1.287 (0.7-2.378) 0.421
Lowest PaO2/FiO2 ratio, median (IQR) 135 (89-235) 100 (65-191) 150 (100-269) 0.081 0.995 (0.988-1.002) 0.13
Days of highest O2, n (%) 7 (5-10) 7 (5-10) 6 (4.75-10) 0.849 0.965 (0.873-1.068) 0.5
Lowest lymphocyte value, cells/mm3, median (IQR) 620 (320-1480) 540 (217-772) 780 (415-2313) 0.033 1 (0.999-1) 0.732
Highest CRP value, mg/dL, median (IQR) 10 (2.9-20) 14.4 (10-28.6) 6.3 (2.3-15) 0.005 1.076 (1.016-1.140) 0.012
Highest LDH value, IU/mL, median (IQR) 384 (289-524) 368 (289-452) 384 (258-533) 0.788 0.999 (0.996-1.002) 0.4
Ferritin on admission, median (IQR) 595 (246-1335) 740 (279-1342) 520 (205-1073) 0.332 1 (0.999-1.001) 0.588
Highest D-dimer value, median (IQR) 765 (533-1524) 761 (497-1392) 1051 (570-1526) 0.554 1 (1) 0.641
Table 2. Differences in vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients in variables associated with COVID-19 severity.
Table 2. Differences in vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients in variables associated with COVID-19 severity.
Vaccinated
N=32
Non-vaccinated
N=22
p-value
Cumulative steroid dose during admission, milligrams, median (IQR) 78 (50-163) 168.5 (80-568) 0.031
Highest CRP value, mg/dL, median (IQR) 8.26 (2.34-21.59) 12.36 (3.33-17.37) 0.223
Worst WHO grade, median (IQR) 5 (5-6.5) 6 (5-7) 0.089
Lowest PaO2/FiO2 ratio, median (IQR) 183 (100-275) 100 (75-140) 0.015
Days of highest O2, n (%) 6.5 (4.25-9.75) 7 (5-10) 0.739
Highest LDH value, IU/mL, median (IQR) 348 (221-528) 390 (305-505) 0.460
Lowest lymphocyte value, cells/mm3, median (IQR) 600 (315-1635) 680 (355-1065) 0.945
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

© 2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated